Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--extensive collection
--easy to navigate; helpful user interface
--attractive models (and lots of them)
--artistic approach to the shoots |
| Cons: |
--lacks diversity (both in terms of models and shoots)
--videos tend to be unambitious and predictable
--the sheer volume of material can be a bit overwhelming |
| Bottom Line: |
I can only subscribe to a few sites a year, and Met Art is always on the list. Unlike ALS, these are artistic shoots with an erotic bent -- nothing extreme here. But like ALS, many models are on the younger (legal) side, so if you're seeking out a new model, you can't go wrong here. Honestly, sometimes the youth concerns me -- some of the younger models look out of their element, as if they're not yet entirely comfortable with their sexuality. But most models look entirely comfortable, and the fact that so many of them have returned to do follow-up shoots speaks to their comfort level with the site and its producers.
The photo shoots have a quality about them that can transport you to an Eden-like place where beauty roams the countryside in all its natural splendor. (Outdoor shoots aren't uncommon.) And the models seem to be enjoying the experience. And OH, what beauties they attract: Lorena B (singled out by Standard in his review, and rightly so), Katie A, Lily C, Mia D, Nikia A, and Niemira (who apparently needs no last initial) are merely a few of the models who consistently grace this site with their beauty, and the shoots are always respectful and revealing.
When I do sign up for a one-month membership, I also like to search for models (like Nastya E) who are no longer posing for shoots but whose archives are available. All models are easy to locate, and each shoot is rated by members to help guide you (if interested). There are treasures to be mined on Met Art if you devote yourself.
On the downside, I'll echo what my fellow reviewers have offered: you don't find much diversity on the site. Most of the models have similar features, and depending on the model, shoots can become rather predictable (even though the site uses an impressive aray of photogs). The beauty and artistry, for me, is enough to overcome such a flaw, but it's there, which means that after you've spent some time on the site, you might find yourself needing a break.
Finally, the shoots are, as I mentioned, revealing but never too revealing. Parted labia may represent the most extreme content on Met Art. :-) Those expecting more may be disappointed; or they may come away from the site appreciating the female form as art. Whether that gets them off is another question entirely. |
|
01-08-17 01:14pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
2
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--attractive models, usually
--high-quality photo techniques
--decent collection of models |
| Cons: |
--more clinical than erotic
--the site emphasizes youthful (legal) females, which means lots of pigtails and the like, which is silly at times |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit it: I've never understood why guys go gaga over this site. Yeah, I know the girls look younger and cuter, and they're willing to push the limits, but too often this site turns models into sideshow freaks, using odd contraptions and (occasionally) human assistants to show us just how far a vagina can be stretched. So hot. Not. Future gynecologists probably benefit from the site, but this isn't erotica, folks. In fact, in most photos, the models look anything but turned on: they're amused or speechless or bewildered. Similarly, I'm speechless and bewildered, too -- by the over-the-top reviews of ALS. |
|
01-07-17 12:14pm
Replies (5)
|
|
