Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Brutal Castings
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Fetish Network of I believe 52 sites.
Some variety ethnically but all the models are very young.
I normally would avoid a site with the word "brutal" in the title, but these scenes are not brutal at all. Some are even arousing and fun to watch.
I knew a lot of the 59 models which is a surprise for me and like the ones I know of. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating and really I don't think the network is updating.
Nearly every model has tattoos. I personally like tattoos, but know it is more often seen as a negative by porn fans.
Too predictable as each scene is identical except for the models.
Prechecked cross sell |
| Bottom Line: |
Brutal Castings has 59 videos that has not updated since April 2017. It was active for about two years and it was very controversial.
In the documentary “Hot Girls Wanted” porn star Ava Taylor states that her scene on this site turned her off from continuing her career. The fact is that she did scenes after the one on this site and later admitted that the reason she left porn had nothing to do with this scene.
After that controversy the site changed the format somewhat. At the end of each scene, they had an interview with the porn star. They talked about how much fun it was and that they were happy they did the scenes. You see smiling and sometimes laughing. How sincere this was is unknowable. Maybe it was required by the site as a condition in order to get paid. This is fairly common on sites that have BDSM as a theme.
What this boils down to is a site with forceful, but BDSM that is light by porn standards. If you have seen Kink sites, you could even call this one tame in comparison. The basic premise is that a very young aspiring, but inexperienced wannabe glamour model shows up at a modeling agency. She is coaxed into going to topless with panties or just bra and panties. They are verbally pressured to go nude, they resist and are lightly tied up, binding their wrists together with a rope. The abuse is not really much and is primarily verbal.
Ava Taylor looked a bit spaced out in her scene, but not shocked. I think she was not into this sexually and was just earning a paycheck. None of the women seem sincerely surprised or shocked either.
I did not see any anal and every scene is oral by one partner on the other and then vaginal. There is nothing over the top sexually.
Besides Ava Taylor, they also have Sadie Pop, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. These are all beautiful professionals that can be counted on for top notch scenes. However, one scene caught my eye with star Ally Berry. I have never seen her before but she is my new favorite as she is the perfect combination of looks and believable enthusiasm. I am fairly sure all the models are Americans.
By itself this site does not have enough to get my recommendation. However there are many other interesting sites that are included as the network has 52 sites. |
|
08-12-20 12:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
177
|
Holed
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful American models. I found them all to be outstanding.
Segpay is the biller.
168 updates with a trailer and a photoset for each video
Fast downloads and easy navigation.
Nice production values, enjoyable scenes.
All videos available for download up to 4K |
| Cons: |
Prechecked cross sale where you don’t expect it. There is a drop down box for yes or no.
I wish these sites would either start naming the filenames what the scene is or hire someone to come organize these scenes for me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t usually look for anal focused sites, but it was interesting anyway. The site is very professional in its production values as well as the selection of models.
There are many beautiful American models, 122 to be precise. Some I did not know, but many were big names in the industry. As I am sure people know by now, I am a collector of some favorite models and I found some videos here that I have never seen before. The ultimate pro Jynx Maze has three scenes that were new to me. A few others were quite good starring Kendra Spade and Chloe Amour. I loved Asian May Thai and hope I can find more of her scenes. She has that natural Asian petite look that I find irresistible, and she is a great performer as well. I would have preferred more ethnic variety, but at least there were a few scenes with MILFs for a variety in age. It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector. They have a few models I collect and this content is exclusive.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well. I am happy with 720 HD, but some feel a need for the best quality available.
In June and July there were three updates. The older videos are not dated, so I don’t know what is happening here. At the moment there are 168 updates and as many photo sets for each. You do get value for your money, even if it eventually becomes an archive site.
Downloads were very fast and were as fast as my computer can operate. I was able to max out my system at about 80 to 85 percent.
I think they could make it easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them. I also would have liked if the file names were all unique. I did not see any reason to have to rename every video download. They also don’t have any scene descriptions, so you are not sure what you will get. At least there is a trailer for each video.
I found many interesting scenes, it's a good site overall. |
|
08-12-20 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
178
|
Nanny Spy
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, quasi-hidden cam (at beginning) porn.
All scenes have videos and photos to download
Many download options up to 4K
Porn Users has a discount, but I joined through the Porn Pros upgrade packed
40 excellent models |
| Cons: |
There are only 41 videos, but they are all exclusive
Only two updates since the Rabbits review last October.
Filenames make no sense. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nanny Spy is available by itself using a discount through Porn Users. I got an offer to sign up for the upgrade package from Porn Pros, when I joined there back in April.
Nanny Spy is one of those smaller but interesting sites with only 41 videos, so as a single standalone site I cannot recommend it. There is a photo set and a trailer for each. In spite of its small size, I found a lot to like about it.
The scenes appear to be shot in beautiful and expensive homes in the Los Angeles area. I lived there during my younger days, but did not live in homes like these. They have beautiful expensive furniture and such extras like outdoor and indoor jacuzzis. The families hire nannies and check up on them using spy cams.
The nannies are always up to doing something they should not be, like using the house for a cam show, getting caught watching porn or using the sex toys they discover and masturbating. The fun starts as the daddy, the man of the house, catches them and confronts them.
There is an age difference in the pairings. This could have been the focus, but for the most part it is not what you do see. There is concept of a power difference and its consequences. The nannies are willing to do “anything” once they are caught. The nannies seem to like paying a price for their misbehaving and very willingly enjoy the sex.
In the real life Los Angeles I knew, there was a lot more ethnic diversity than you see here. There is one Asian model and no Latinas. The models they have here are some of the best stars in the United States, both in looks and in how professionally they perform. There is nothing fake about them either. They do their scenes well. Riley Reid and Adriana Chechik are great here, but I expect that from them as they are two of the best in the business.
The effort that was put into the videos makes them work. The site though is not so well done. There are no scene descriptions, or tags and the file names are always the same. So you get for example mp4_1080 for every scene that you download in 1080p. If you want to know who or what is in the scene, you have to change all the file names. Another weakness is that the scenes do not show a date and only two have been added since the last Rabbit’s review in October, 2019. I suspect it has stopped updating.
I feel the site would have the potential to be in the 90’s if they had more updates. This is porn, so I am often disappointed when a good concept is left to remain undeveloped. |
|
08-12-20 12:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
179
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An eleven site ladyboy network with I think broad appeal
Over 1,000 models
Over 3,000 videos and newer videos have 4K option
Over 3,000 photo sets with zip downloads
Very good navigation via model search, latest updates or categories. You can also search by site.
Scenes seem genuine, the “straight” males in the scenes seem surprised, but also don’t push the pretty ladyboys away. |
| Cons: |
Very little story other than whatever the specific site’s niche is.
Camerawork could be better at times. Showing someone’s face while they orgasm kind of ruins the point of showing whatever happened before the orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have always been intrigued by transsexuals and more specifically ladyboys. Being from India, I knew a few ladyboys and there was an unexplainable attraction to them.
Which was one disappointment for me. For some reason, I thought this network had a lot of scenes with ladyboys having sex with women, but it only has 10. It does have nearly 200 solo scenes which returns to my fetish of seeing “men” masturbating. I think that number might be low as I have seen several solo scenes not marked as solo.
I don’t consider myself close to an expert on ladyboys or transsexuals, but my understanding and my eyes tell me a ladyboy is usually of smaller frame, most look to be Asian and most look very feminine. That is why I think the ladyboy niche could have a broader appeal. I know a lot of straight guys would say they’re not interested, but some of these ladyboys might change your view.
From a professional view, I have studied about the men born with the XXY chromosome or the Klinefelter Syndrome. I think it would be interesting if these transsexual and ladyboy sites discussed that more. As some of these “men” are born more dispositioned to be females than males even if they have a dick.
That is what you see a lot of on Ladyboy Gold. A lot of these models would never pass as a male. The solo scenes give us a different perspective of a dick being masturbated since these models are more feminine, you see more hip movement, more what I would call sexual movements and I find it very attractive.
The network is large with over 3,000 videos and 3,000 photo sets. It goes back to 2007. They update 5 days a week and some, not all, of the updates have up to 4K video.
The sites you receive with the network are: Ladyboys Fucked Bareback, LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Crush, TSRaw, Ladyboy Vice, Ladyboy Dildo, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Wank, Ladyboy Angel and Ladyboy Glamour with Ladyboy Gold being the hub and main site.
I am most impressed with the passion you see in these scenes. You won’t see models looking bored or just wanting the scene to end. They look like they are very much into the scenes. For the females into cumshots, it’s one of the best parts since the scenes with a male with the ladyboy both cum and I think it also could appeal to bi-curious women since you are going to see boobs, feminine bodies, but with a dick.
I do think it takes longer than a month with this network. I knew zero of these models and find myself a little overwhelmed at times. The scenes I found most interesting were the orgy/gangbangs. I was hoping to see more of those with women included. It would make you wonder if the male was going to get off more with the anal with the ladyboy or the vaginal with the woman. I have really enjoyed this network especially with the easy navigation and no ads. |
|
07-15-20 04:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
180
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This has to be the biggest transsexual site.
Over 2,000 models and over 6,000 scenes.
Interesting way of releasing and categorizing scenes: Climax Mondays, Tryout Tuesdays, Post-Op, Hardcore and Model of the Month.
Some of the prettiest transsexuals I have ever seen.
They update 6 days a week.
Scenes with women having sex with the transsexuals. |
| Cons: |
Some of the least attractive transsexual models I have ever seen. I am sure the large number of models goes into this.
The site goes beyond overwhelming. I do not know the word for beyond overwhelming. It does hurt the usage and navigation of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is supposed to be the best, the biggest and oldest transsexual porn site on the internet. It says it has been around since 1995. The first scene that I noticed led me to join despite a fairly high price. It has Joanna Angel from Burning Angel in a threesome with two transsexuals.
I went to the advanced search since I can’t find any categories. Surprising and a little disappointing, there are only 9 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women and one is the Joanna Angel scene. They made up for that when I searched for solo and they have over 600 solo scenes. Some of these solo scenes are unbelievably good. One has very large boobs that look natural, an 8 inch dick and she cums 3 times without stopping.
In doing a direct comparison to Ladyboy Gold which I also joined and reviewed, the models here – overall, are not as attractive to me as Ladyboy Gold’s models, but that is just a subjective preference.
I do think part of that is because these are transsexuals and not ladyboys. A lot of these models have a more masculine frame and build. It’s not the case with all of the models though. Some of these girls look like teen girls I have seen on solo teen girl sites like Nubiles.
It has only happened a couple of times, but I think should be mentioned. When going to download a file a screen pops up that says they don’t recognize my machine and they have to send an email with a code for me to input. I have used the same computer each time I have been on the site. Their quality is very high starting with a 480p file that goes up to 4K and that’s on all of the newer scenes I have watched. You can download or stream. They also have photo sets you can download of each scene and screencaps that can be downloaded too.
I did find the Post-Op section to be interesting and wonder how many straight males would be into that. They did a good job on the surgery.
The advanced search is expansive, and it works. You can even make multiple selections in it with choices like cock size (small, average, 7.5+) hair color, type of action, so it really shouldn’t be this overwhelming but it is and I think so because there are quite a few of the models I don’t find attractive.
They include a bonus section with content from other transsexual sites. I have never thought this was a good idea since the competitor is probably sending their best content.
I do think I am being a little hard on the attractiveness part and want to explain that. They have so many models, if I picked out the ones, I find attractive, it would probably be a higher number than any other transsexual site.
They also have a full model list which does not help me much since it would take forever to go through 2,000 models. They do seem to do everything right though.
One part I find confusing and maybe it’s a non-issue. When I first heard of Grooby Girls it was on T-Girl Japan. I want to think the content from that site is on this Grooby Girls site since it said Grooby on it, but I’m not for sure it is. When you look at how many site Grooby has, over 40, you have to wonder if that means you have to join each of those sites to get the specific content. This would be a major negative to me since all of their sites are over $30. I do think that is the case. When I use the advanced search, it has three countries listed, the UK, Spain and the United States. I did reduce the score for this. If they can tell me I was wrong in this assumption, I will add some points back. It seems crazy to think you would have to spend over $1,000 just to get all their content.
I can recognize their importance to the transsexual niche, but that’s just too much content spread out across many sites. |
|
07-15-20 04:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
181
|
Bi Sex Digital
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Look what I accidentally found! The biggest bisexual site I have joined.
279 DVDs.
The DVDs average 3-4 scenes per each one.
Attractive males and pretty females.
A lot of orgies. |
| Cons: |
Look what I wished I hadn’t found. The list of complaints will have to go in the bottom line.
No downloads
The site pages take 3-10 seconds to load.
The streaming player is even slower and is glitchy.
The welcome email told me I have access to other sites. When I tried signing in them there’s no access. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said in previous reviews of bisexual sites it’s very hard to find good ones. I saw this in a Gamma promo, the price was low (under $10), the amount of content was the most I had seen. Nowhere on the join page or the promo was it mentioned there are no downloads. When I signed up the page glitched with a broken link that said, “Go to member’s area here”. I opened my email account and had two emails from them. Both said Bisexdigital in the subject, but inside the second one it said I have access to Austin Wilde. I went to that site and tried to sign in, it said no account. I went back to the other email which had a direct link to Bisexdigital. The site took forever to open. Once it did, I was able to sign into it and find out all the videos are streaming only.
The streaming player buffers every 3 seconds. The site itself takes up maybe half of my monitor. It looks like it was made in the early days of the internet.
The content looks good, but if I can’t get it to stream without constant buffering and can’t download it, what good is it?
They show having 279 movies. I do not know if they are just counting full DVDs or scenes. The Best Porn review says it has a 200GB daily download limit. The whole site says it has 403GB of videos. That makes the 279 sound like standard definition DVDs at around 1.5GB each.
I do recognize some of these scenes from my collection of bisexual scenes, but there are a lot I don’t have. I don’t know why so many bisexual sites are streaming only. Most of the content is from 8 or more years ago and is 480p in the streaming player.
They have some of the first bisexual DVDs I saw back in 2007. It’s easily the most impressive collection I have seen. With bisexual porn you already know it’s likely to be 480p, so that part is forgivable. I would be willing to pay more to have a download option. That is the main reason I’m not giving it a bad score. The scenes are good. If you’re okay with streaming these scenes are good. Bisexual porn was creative back then. |
|
07-15-20 04:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
182
|
Pantyhose Creep
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the very large Fetish Network of 52 sites
The site focuses on legs, short skirts and pantyhose
Interesting premise that got my attention
Very attractive models.
Good video quality
Good yearly price with promo
There is a voyeur and exhibitionist feel to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
Questionable business ethics
Isn't updating
Download limits
Small site |
| Bottom Line: |
When I originally reviewed The Fetish Network, I was happy with it, but I'm starting to become less interested in it.
There have been several complaints about this network. I have not had a lot of the common problems others have had. There is a problem with canceling that requires you to email them and there is a download limit.
I joined the network on a year subscription and it is non-recurring. This site was the one that interested me the most on the network. I have a reverse foot fetish and usually any site with pantyhose is set up for reverse foot fetish.
I used the reverse foot fetish term in the past and a few members asked what that means. Reverse foot fetish is when the female gets as much arousal from the foot fetish or more than the male. Pantyhose leads to this since the woman has to slide them off which makes a lot of women feel sexy. The guys in porn seem to always be horny anyway, but to see women who are horny before any sex even starts is -- in my opinion -- very erotic.
You can also find reverse foot fetish on the Jerk-off Instruction sites. I don't know if it is something a female would notice more, but the sheer pantyhose often shows how wet the woman is before the action starts.
This site does that well. The scenes are setup by a "perverted" man filming an unaware young woman. I don't know if this would hurt the fantasy for some, but most of the models don't have panties on under their short skirts. The guy becomes braver. This is shown by him moving closer and closer. Oops, he blew his cover or something else. He talks to the woman about how he would like to photograph her for a photography shoot. This leads to him asking for sex and that leads to the best part.
They deny him, but agree to tease, strip and even masturbate for his camera. That for me is enough to show the reverse foot fetish. She's as aroused as he is by him looking at her feet, thighs and everything her pantyhose shows.
That also shows the downside to this network. There are only 44 scenes on the site and it hasn't updated in years. The network has a similar problem. They have a lot of interesting and well-produced scenes, but I can't tell if anything is updating.
It might also show my very specific niche interests which isn't easy to fulfill.
I am in my 6th month of my membership and the sites that interested me the most, including this one, have not updated during those 6 months.
It was a good promo price back around Christmas and I really can't complain about my overall experience since I haven't had any of the problems others have. It makes me wonder if the year promo doesn't have download limits and non-recurring means I don't have to go through what sounds like a frustrating process.
This site would rate in the 90 range or higher just by itself if they had even 150-200 of these scenes. Be sure to make note of the other comments left on the network's page here. I can't verify the problems, but enough people have had them it's hard to ignore. I won't be rejoining once the year is up since I already have everything I want from the network. |
|
07-14-20 08:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
183
|
Chaos Men
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What I saw as an obscure gay site is now my favorite gay site.
2,395 exclusive videos of I think amateur men.
They have zipped photos, zipped cam caps (screencaps) and animated gifs you can download. Not all scenes have all 3, but those animated gifs in a zip file (usually more than 5) is the first time I have seen that offered and those are good to save on your phone for “lunch breaks” at work.
CCbill is the biller which I have found is rarely the case for gay sites.
Large collection of solo scenes, the men are mostly masculine, and each scene includes pertinent model facts like dick size, cut/uncut.
High quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded.
Was cheaper than I expected, the price I was given was $12.48 for the first month and $19.95 if you let it recur. |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos look like they are self-shot or shot by someone using a phone camera. The quality is fine, but some are filmed vertically so if you watch on a computer monitor or television the video, even at 1080p, only takes up the middle of your screen.
Exclusive and amateur is just based on my limited knowledge of gay porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I know it might be unexpected for a straight woman to join gay sites, but I have three reasons. Straight sites rarely have a guy masturbating or being masturbated unless handjob or CFNM and two, gay porn does seem to be the only possible way to see solo men.
The third reason and I would call it the biggest reason is being from India most of the men in India spend their entire lives denying masturbation and saying they have never done it. Which also means they will not do it in front of even their girlfriend or wife. These same men will spend their entire lives looking up porn of Desi women that strip or do sexual dances in their traditional clothes. These same men will then say they “just watch” the videos!
I have been in the United States for over 10 years now, speak English fairly clear and have developed fetishes Indian men wouldn’t do, but American men will do.
Chaos Men has solo scenes that are exactly what I look for. I can find transsexual videos that have good solo videos, but what I look for requires another step of at least masculine men being the ones masturbating. My image of a masculine man might not be like others. Hairy chest is good, a beard is very good and his body frame doesn’t really matter unless he’s slimmer than I am. Most of the gay sites I have joined feature a lot of “twinks”. These are slimmer men that look very young. There is not a lot of fantasy there for me. I probably could dominate them. The men on Chaos Men are not all “bears” either, but most are medium to bigger built in frame and it lets me have my fantasy like and older man looking at a pretty 19 year old woman.
It's not perfect. It does not have categories. You have to search for what you are looking for and hope the search box brings it up. This site has 794 solo scenes. The men are mostly that moderate to bigger build, many have beards or at least some facial hair, some are bald, there are tattoos, which I do not see as adding masculinity. Many even have hairy armpits which you rarely see on the twink gay sites. There’s chest hair, some even have back hair, which is not a turn-off for me. I think the difference in cultures shows there. The hairier a man is the more masculine I see him.
And there are 794 of these scenes! I have been happy with sites that had 20 masculine men masturbating.
A complaint that I think some would have is some of these scenes are 15 years old. Those only have a 240p option on downloads.
I was a little worried it was going to be one of those gay sites where they started out with solo guys then stopped filming solo once they upgraded their cameras, but it’s almost the exact opposite. I was so interested in looking at all these guys that I went through their pages finding when they switched to better cameras. I hope that shows my enthusiasm.
The first 20 solo videos only had 240p videos. The next 60 moved up to 360p. Starting there, they added 720p and 1080p. Which means they have over 700 videos of solo men with both 720p and 1080p download options while only having around 80 in the poorer quality. On the newer videos they also offer two versions of 720p, these add the 60 frames per second version, while the other versions are 30 frames per second. The 1080p in the newer versions is only available in 60 frames per second. I am fine with the 30 frames per second since this site is going to do a good job of trying to make me buy another external hard drive as it is! The size difference between the 720p with 30 frames per second is 414MB, the 720p with 60 frames per second is 1.01GB or more than double the size.
The animated gifs is a feature I have never seen on any site. These are not like the ones you can find on Google, these are up to 5 seconds long and there are 8-12 included in a zip so you can watch them in a row and get the best parts without sound and without needing much space on your phone. The pictures are very good quality and show the guy going from clothed and limp to nude and hard. Those can be downloaded in a zip too.
I have joined gay networks, gay standalone sites, looking for something like this, but cannot say any of those sites made me feel like I could with confidence recommend them to straight women, but I can this one. Straight women and most gay men have similar interests when it comes to men. I never thought I would say I felt lucky finding a porn site, but I do. It is as if this is exactly what I have been looking for and finally found it. Having CCBill as the biller is also great. I joined a few other gay sites that had billers I had never heard of. I'm planning on letting it recur at least for a month since it was only $12.48 for the first month. There also is plenty of the male/male and group scenes for gay men to enjoy too. This is easily my favorite of the gay sites I have joined. The quality continues with the filenames including the model’s name. Had to edit 5 times to get below 5,000 characters. |
|
06-17-20 05:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
Pride Studios
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay network that is run by the same people as Adult Time. With this many gay sites I have to wonder if they will eventually have a Gay Adult Time or just add all the Gay scenes to Adult Time? This is the second gay network I have reviewed from Gamma.
Nine sites are included and combined they have 4,502 videos.
Videos are downloadable with the subscription I bought, but they do also offer a streaming membership as well, make sure to pay attention when signing up.
This is just an observation: There are more masculine men on this network than other gay networks I have been on. I see the word “bear” a lot and you get the bigger build, hairy (beards, chests) here than on other gay networks.
Currently averaging 4 updates per week.
Plenty of scenes here for straight women to enjoy too. |
| Cons: |
If you have any kind of preconceived notion of what a gay man looks like or acts like, it is probably going to be messed up by this network. A lot of these guys look like big, burly lumberjacks and athletes. I am listing that in cons for the gay men readers who prefer the twinks.
Just an outsider’s opinion, there is not as much to do in gay sex as straight sex. I join gay sites for the solo scenes, but some of these guys in male/male scenes were sexy enough to watch and I just felt like they need to add a woman. That is an idea even. How about a site where a woman masturbates while two men have sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
These are the sites you receive with this network:
Pride Studios
Bearback
Cock Virgins
Circle Jerk Boys
Boyz Party
Dylan Lucas
Extra Big Dicks
High Performance Men
Men Over 30
Being in my 30s, I really do not see a lot of these guys looking like they’re under 30. I am saying that in response to their site “Men Over 30”. Most of these guys look in their 30s to 40s. There is a total of 2,543 different guys. This is a large network. They also offer photos and their count is just over 250,000 total photos. They have some niches here that I had not seen before like Beards and Bulges, Husbands in Lockdown and I think those could interest straight women.
My main interest is the solo videos. This did create a problem. They do not have categories. They have tags so if you find a solo scene you will see the solo tag, BUT you cannot click it. They have 10-20 tags per scene, but none are clickable. This left me with one option and that was to use the search box. I am getting mixed results with that. A few test examples based on their tags:
I searched for “solo”
Eight of the first twelve scenes that came up are solo. Which is not bad, but it does show a weakness when trying to find specific tags/niches.
I searched for “jerking off” which is one of their tags.
The first problem is it doubled every scene so there is Live Life, Scene #02 listed twice in the first 12 results. Of the first 12 results for jerking off, only 3 are solo guys.
It’s going to take some work to find all the solo scenes, but there is a large collection of them that I have already downloaded (100+).
I don’t know if I am just not very knowledgeable about gay porn or sex, but the site Circle Jerk Boys, which I expected to be a group of guys masturbating together really isn’t. It has a few scenes where the guys are masturbating together, but most of those turn into standard sex.
That is really my biggest complaint. Make the content easier to sort and search. This is the first site (gay, straight, transsexual) I have been on that has tags that are not clickable.
You do get very good quality videos. It is similar to Adult Time’s video download options with 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
It looks like for the current situation with the pandemic they are releasing compilation videos and that is okay with me since I didn’t have any of the content. I cannot speak for gay men, but this network does lean more towards the big, athletic, bear type male models than twinks. Some of the most commonly seen tags are “Athletic”, “Beefy”, “Muscular” and “Jock Strap”.
Besides the issue with finding what you are looking for this is a very good network. |
|
06-17-20 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
185
|
Private Classics
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s.
Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s.
The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings.
Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each.
Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads.
Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched. |
| Cons: |
I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes).
No category search or tags
They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update.
The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not.
I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed.
One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately.
I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB.
There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes.
I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses?
The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene.
The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again.
There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site. |
|
06-17-20 05:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
186
|
Sins Life
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion, one of the most attractive men in porn, Johnny Sins and his equally as attractive wife Kissa Sins.
I don’t know a lot of porn stars, but the ones on here are very well-known, Adriana Chechik has 7 sets, Veronica Rodriguez has 10, Katrina Jade has 7. The site is very professional.
Rare at least to me, reverse gangbangs and group sex with Johnny taking on 3-5 women at a time in some of the scenes.
Very realistic “diary” feel to the site. Some scenes start with Johnny and Kissa cooking and eating breakfast or one of them turning the camera on as the other one wakes up.
Most of the scenes have 1080p, but some top out at 720p, there is a con that makes that important.
Outdoor scenes, vacations, game-type scenes, very good variety to keep things interesting.
Uses Epoch, watch out for the pre-checked cross sale. |
| Cons: |
I had read there is a 5GB per day download limit, the bad news is, the download limit is still in place, but the good news is it’s now 10GB per day. Most of the 1080p scenes are over 1GB. I have only been downloading the 720p and haven’t hit the limit.
Way too many ads. The ads also look like scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
They say you never forget your first time. The very first porn I saw once I had moved to the United States was Johnny Sins with, I believe, Eva Angelina, there was a motorcycle involved in the scene and he was measuring her ass. I have always liked his scenes since then.
This is the site him and his wife Kissa run. I don’t know if she was a porn star before she met him, but her performances say she was. There is a realistic and even fun side to the site. They seem to really enjoy each other’s company and she’s open to him being with other women. Which I admit, I keep wanting to find one where she is with another man just to see if it brings out a more aggressive, more competitive Johnny.
There are nearly 350 scenes, and these can be what looks like a normal studio porn scene or Johnny using his phone’s camera to show Kissa giving him a blowjob while he’s driving. It is like watching them document their sex life.
I was a little concerned about the download limit since I knew I would want a lot of these scenes. I’m downloading 10-15 scenes per day and not hitting a limit. It says if you hit the download limit it will be reset in 24 hours or you can send them an email. If I download even 10 scenes per day, that would be 300 in a month or nearly the whole site. I don’t really like the scenes that look more like standard porn so I doubt I will hit the limit.
There are 122 models including some I haven’t seen that look like they should be in porn if they’re not. That number includes Johnny and Kissa. It does not look like they are currently releasing any new scenes. I know some sites aren’t or can’t because of Coronavirus, so I won’t count that against them. They did have 3 new scenes in April 2020, but none so far in May 2020.
There’s just a real factor here that you don’t see on most porn sites. One scene might only be 12 minutes, the next will be 47 minutes, it’s like following their sex life.
It's one of the better straight sites I’ve joined lately, and I will mention this here since I don’t know how long the deal is good for or I would have put it in the pros. When I went to sign up they had a special $9.95 per month price and said it would also recur at $9.95. I didn’t use any special promo or anything to get that offer. I just went to the site and it was in the join options. Great site, I hope they keep it going. |
|
05-18-20 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
187
|
Cody Cummings
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very handsome, bisexual male who does solo, bisexual, heterosexual and gay scenes.
A total of 314 scenes with 79 being solo, the rest are a blend of hetero, bisexual and gay.
Most scenes are HD (720p or 1080p with smaller resolutions available).
Very pretty girls in the scenes that feature women. It’s rare to see bisexual threesomes with two males and a pretty woman, but the ones here are.
Photo sets can be downloaded.
The tags can be made to just apply to the content on this site so it doesn’t bring up other sites on the network. |
| Cons: |
Seems to be a recurring theme, no longer updating.
The oldest scenes only have 480p download option.
Not much story in the scenes, especially the bisexual ones, it seems like those would be perfect for a story. |
| Bottom Line: |
Cody Cummings is one of the few male porn stars I know by name and have always found him attractive, but I don’t know if he has retired and I’ve just been watching too many tube sites or if he has moved on to other sites. I wouldn’t know if this is true, but this is the biggest solo site I have seen of a male gay/bisexual porn star. Cody is in every scene.
I still think sites like this one help blur the line between what appeals to gay men and straight women. There are scenes with Cody and a woman. Scenes with Cody, another man and a woman. Cody with just a man or men and Cody by himself. Every site I have found that at least is trying to blur that line has stopped updating.
Cody is a muscular, very fit guy that looks like he probably had a past in sports of some kind. One part that impresses me about his scenes is he seems to really be into all of them. Even the solo ones, which could be seen as a bad thing by some since he does seem to really embrace his own attractiveness.
There are over 300 scenes, as helpful as their categories are, they don’t have one for “bisexual”. I’m going to estimate there’s maybe 30 bisexual scenes, maybe 10 hetero and around 80 solo, the rest are gay scenes, but are not always the typical gay scene. There are ones where Cody and another guy or guy masturbate together. These too are appealing to me.
The video quality on this site is good with around 250 of the scenes having at least 720p or 1080p download choices. As a whole this network – Next Door Studios – in my opinion, is as good as it gets for straight females looking for sites with males masturbating and I think Cody’s site is the best of the sites on the network. |
|
05-18-20 10:27pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
188
|
Next Door Male
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly the biggest solo male site.
Most of the guys are masculine enough to appeal to straight women.
Over 500 solo videos on this site, the number could be higher, but I’m not watching every scene to see if another man slips in later in the scene.
Newer videos have up to 1080p – but no 4K.
Easy site to use and download from. Works with free download manager.
Photos that can be downloaded, but I don’t look at the photos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the guys just are not going to appeal to straight females. I’m only mentioning that because the title of the site, “Next Door Male” has nothing in it to show that it’s a gay model site.
The last update was 6/11/2019
Video quality matches the site’s inconsistency. This site has scenes covering a 15 year period. It doesn’t look like anything has been remastered. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the best site on the Next Door Studios network – if you are a straight woman. The whole theme is solo men. I’m going to say the majority of these men could be believable straight men. There is a whole “tough guy” or maybe it’s a military vibe with the guys. I’m not American so I’m basing that on stereotypes. There are a lot of tattooed guys. Short hair, muscular physiques, not a lot of really big dicks, so I guess they are really going for the “guy next door” look with their models.
The scenes show one of the weaknesses of solo men porn. They aren’t trying to tease the viewer, they aren’t talking much, they are just trying to cum as fast as possible.
I do like that the scenes are filmed in different houses/rooms, and it makes it look like these guys just showed up at home and decided to record themselves masturbating. One solo men site I was on had the men all using the same room and couch to masturbate on. It was like being a fly on the wall of a sperm clinic.
I listed over 500 solo scenes in the pros. The number is closer to 600, but as mentioned, I am not watching them all from start to finish to make sure there’s not another guy in some of the scenes.
The one part that is a concern is the video quality. This took awhile and might not be exact, but in 2012 they added 1080p. That is only about 1/3 the total videos. The other 2/3 were before 2012. Those either top out at 720p or 480p.
I think with this niche and seeing that it’s no longer updating, you have to take what you can get and not complain too much. I don’t think they can add much personality to the scenes since the created “masculinity” might not hold up as well. Besides tattoos, beards, there are UFC posters on the walls in some scenes and most of the guys are “hairy”. I have learned enough about gay porn trying to find solo men scenes that I know this more masculine look is a niche in gay porn.
The scenes give very little to talk about other than a man sits down or stands in front of a mirror and starts masturbating. It’s a very good site and network if that sounds like something you would like. |
|
05-18-20 10:25pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
189
|
Stroke That Dick
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, mostly believable straight, masculine, handsome men masturbating.
The guys on here make the cumshot look like they’re painting a masterpiece.
Downloadable photos
Videos are downloadable but are all 480p.
Comes with the very good Next Door Studios Network |
| Cons: |
The site hasn’t been updated in 12 years.
While it’s a con, only 77 scenes, that’s more solo scenes of men than I’ve seen on some men DVD sites.
Probably the most masculine men on the site and they stopped updating it.
Same location for most shoots |
| Bottom Line: |
This was a tough site to review. It’s not easy being a straight woman trying to find porn of believably straight men masturbating. You can find them on tube sites and if you join a dating site!
This is probably the closest I’ve seen to what looks like and acts like believable straight men masturbating. There are a few of the guys that don’t seem straight, but it does look like some of these guys are watching porn while masturbating. I can convince myself they’re watching straight porn or a woman masturbating.
I can’t score it high. The video quality is maybe acceptable at 480p, there also hasn’t been an update since 2008. It does – however – make for a good site included with the Next Door Network. Especially since I know more than a few women who join gay sites looking for male masturbation videos. The size of the site with 77 scenes isn’t impressive compared to most porn sites these days, but in male solo porn, 77 scenes is an okay amount.
The pictures are okay too. Though I will say the pictures can change your mind about whether these guys are straight or not. I would recommend avoiding those for any straight women convincing themselves these are straight men.
They do fall into the same repetitious setting that I have noticed on a lot of solo men scenes. There’s been 40-50 guys that came on that couch at least put a cover over it!
When combined with Next Door Network’s “Next Door Male” you will have 650-700 solo men scenes to choose from. The other sites in the network have some solo scenes too, but most are under 15 scenes. This review also will help those females like me that has seen some of these videos on tube sites and wondered how much content the site “Stroke That Dick” has on it. Not a lot and no new updates. At least the videos are downloadable, and the much larger network brings the value up. |
|
05-18-20 10:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
190
|
Next Door Studios
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The Adult Time of gay porn is what I was told about this network. I think it’s owned by the same company that owns Adult Time.
It comes with 17 sites and they are currently offering a free month access to their new site NextDoorTaboo. I didn’t add it as I’m most interested in the solo scenes.
Some of the sites in the network are updating with 4K scenes, most have all the download options Adult Time has with 360p up to 1080p and all the resolutions between those.
Currently advertises 3,599 exclusive videos on the network and 1,513 models.
Has downloadable photo sets, they list them as total photos not total photo sets and have 215,509 photos currently.
Averages a new scene per day. |
| Cons: |
I would have been happier if it were 17 sites of solo men!
The oldest scenes which include a lot of the solo scenes are from 2005 and only have 480p download option
Better use of the tags. I also see this in straight porn too. Why list “masturbation” on a scene that eventually turns into sex? |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network based on a recommendation from another Porn User member. Overall, I am pleased with it. I recognized some of these guys from other gay sites I have joined. I am hoping gay sites will think about the other market they appeal to and that’s straight women who like to watch men masturbating.
They have 17 sites on the network and I’m going to review a few of those separately since they have more focus on solo men. Compared to the other gay sites or networks I have tried, this one really stands out and above the others. There are seven of the “Next Door” themed sites and seven “solo male” sites including one I am very familiar with – Cody Cummings. It also has one more site called “Stroke that Dick”.
This number surprises me since if it’s true this is by far the most solo men videos I have seen on one site. Using their search and filters it says there are 1,720 solo scenes. This is where I took some points off.
Using just their tags it shows 1,093 solo scenes. That’s still a lot more than I have seen anywhere, but it’s still an inconsistency I would rather not see happening. Even on the 1,093 solo scene results there it a second filter to filter within the results and there’s “Anal Sex (16)” listed. It just doesn’t seem like this should be that hard to say, “There’s one guy in this scene and he masturbates.”
One review I read of this network said the downloads cost extra, but they haven’t been extra for me. Even the 4K downloads come with the membership.
I did find their ads to be annoying too. When you sign in you get one of those upsell pages like a lot of straight porn sites have where it shows 9 or more sites you can add to your membership. In the member’s area, there are ads along the bottom of the screen too, but they’re not too annoying.
This is as close to a gay network that can appeal to straight women as I have found and it’s why I’m giving it the score of 94. See my individual reviews of some of the sites on the network to see which ones have the most solo or best solo scenes. |
|
05-18-20 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
191
|
Family Screw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month. |
| Cons: |
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest son”. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist” and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into. |
|
04-29-20 03:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
192
|
Ersties
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly amateur models in solo, male/female, lesbian, group scenes.
Some of the women are very attractive. There is more of a natural look going on here.
Bills through Epoch.
Daily updates and good tagging system.
The solo scenes and especially outdoors solo are the best scenes on here for me.
If you like the site a lot, the 3 month deal for $45 is a good deal. |
| Cons: |
If you are hesitant and only join for one month, it's going to set you back $35.
Besides the tagging system, the overall navigation is not user-friendly and is confusing.
The much hyped "playdate" feature is a free cam show until the model decides you have to pay to see more. Kind of like Chaturbate.
I was attracted to the real couples chemistry aspect of their advertising, they have more solo scenes than male/female, lesbian, threesomes and orgies combined.
I'm straight, maybe bi-curious at times and found none of the men attractive.
Scenes are split for no particular reason.
I also don't care for the whimsical, pastel, layout of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to be a very polarizing site. A brief thought on that, I do like some of the content. I especially found the model Anya to be very attractive and sensual in her newest scene.
After that, a lot of the problems come from what is a business model I don't appreciate. Besides charging $35 for 1 month, there's the Playdate feature that they heavily advertise. If you go to the model list, the first 3 blocks are upcoming Playdates. These are live so you have to be online when they have it. I was able to make it to a recent one. Each one has the words, "Free Live Show" on it. I signed in to watch and was taken to a screen that said:
There are three types of playdates
#1 Free Playdates:
These playdates are open, varied and influenced by you, the viewer! If you want the opportunity to determine the course of the playdate, then make sure you have some Ersties Coins added to your account!
#2 Ticket Playdates:
These shows will be prepared by the Ersties Models themselves, allowing you a front row seat as the models indulge the naughty exhibitionist side of their kinky personality.
Tickets can be purchased in advance of the show using coins from your membership account.
#3 Private Playdates:
If you enjoy an Ersties Playdate and want to get the model a little more intimately, you can invite them to a private 1-on-1 playdate!
If a model offers 1-on-1 playdates, this will be displayed at the bottom of this page.
The tokens or coins cost anywhere from 90 for $15 to 960 for $150. Isn't that just like any cam show? They also have Ersties Cams.
I do believe that's important to the review since you are not told you will have to buy tokens to interact with these Playdates. I wouldn't be as negative about it if they didn't also have Ersties Cams. It makes Playdates look like it's something different.
The site itself, they do solo porn well, but they do have the scenes cut into parts. These parts are not used to switch outfits or locations. One of the recent scenes, a woman lays on the couch and masturbates. The scene stops, the next part of the scene, she is bent over the chair masturbating right beside the couch she was on. She didn't even put her clothes back on.
There are interviews on every scene and they are a separate video. They don't list the number of interviews (no tag for it), but this is what they do list: 639 solo scenes, 384 lesbian scenes, 59 boy/girl, 26 threesomes, 9 orgies. These numbers are not determinations of how many of those scenes they have since most have multiple parts. For instance: Mona and Vanessa In Action 1, Mona and Vanessa In Action 2. Just like the solo scene described above, these two videos are in the same location. It gets halfway through the full scene and stops, then you have to go find part 2 of it. They do not always release them back to back. For instance: Layla and Mae In Action 1 was released and Layla and Mae In Action 2 had 16 other scenes released between In Layla and Mae In Action 1 and Layla and Mae In Action 2.
A lot of the lesbian scenes are good, but who knows how many parts I'm going to miss when my membership expires? They have a Christmas lesbian anal scene that has 4 parts. It looks like the 3rd part came out about six weeks ago, in March.
I do like that they're exploring more into public scenes. I really enjoyed the Rebecca In Action 1 scene of a pretty model masturbating on a train. They also have a lesbian library scene that I liked a lot.
If they start doing more of these risky scenes, it will at least give me interest in coming back, maybe even for 3 months. I also like their group/orgy scenes. A few other notes I've seen advertised include BDSM. They have 15 BDSM scenes and those are split, making it more like 7 or 8.
The navigation is a problem because they group lesbians together, then list them separate if they have a solo scene. Clicking on the scene does show all their scenes, solo, lesbian, etc, but there's no way to figure out how many models they have since one model could be listed solo, then again in lesbian. The scenes can't be counted since most of them have multiple parts to one scene.
I'm not really into or against "natural" models, but in the tags there are 606 scenes listed with shaved pubic hair, 310 with trimmed pubic hair and 230 listed as hairy.
There's something that just doesn't feel right about their advertising. With that said, the scenes overall are okay and would possibly be very good if they didn't split them. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
The best way to finish this up is my membership is about to expire. They released an interview of Caireen and Mirah, it also has a scene of them showering together and Caireen going down on Mirah, but that's In Action 1. Which means I won't likely have my membership when In Action 2 comes out. It's like watching a soap opera or television series. Maybe a longer membership would be the answer? It's an average site with potential for me. |
|
04-19-20 02:40am
Replies (4)
|
Review
193
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site within the Submissed network. Femdom, but is not very rough and often has sex in the scenes.
Good quality videos and consistency in the scenes.
Most guys would love to be “humiliated” like this!
Very attractive models both female and male.
Includes 6 other sites that are BDSM themes; I would say it is a little tamer than Kink – but is still good.
Should appeal to both male and female viewers. |
| Cons: |
Like nearly all sites with this broad appeal, it has stopped updating
38 scenes on this site, the network has over 700. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first con is the biggest pro/con to this site. This really seems like a site that should appeal to both males and females. While there is light domination by the females, many of the scenes lead to the woman giving the man the sex she’s keeping from him. There is even some role-reversal with the guy taking more control. Most of the scenes do seem like something you would see on Kink’s network and part of the reason is, Kink has some of these scenes in their cross-advertising. I was expecting more scenes, but I’m learning quality over quantity.
The videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download photos.
There’s no real pain or humiliation from the scenes I’ve watched. All scenes are male with female. Both seems to thoroughly enjoy the scenes. Surely there are men that would love to be tied up to a chair while a beautiful woman gives him a handjob?
You also get the added tension of how far the woman will let him go. Some of the women do seem to become so turned on by their role of dominance they give in and that’s something – I think, most BDSM sites don’t have enough of. It’s hard to believe a woman who is half naked with a guy groping her with his tied hands wouldn’t become aroused herself.
The closest the scenes get to humiliation involve a guy in something like a pet metal kennel and a woman leading a nude man around with a chain around his neck. There are scenes with ball gags in the guy’s mouth and even duct tape over the guy’s mouth.
Even though I enjoy the entire network it’s this site that is the enigma. The last update was October 30, 2019. This would be one of my favorite sites if it had more scenes and/or was still updating. The network adds more value and includes the sites: Ball Gagger, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. |
|
04-19-20 01:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
194
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site dedicated to bisexual sex, most of the scenes are two bisexual males and one female.
It currently has 71 scenes on it. They update once a week.
Simplistic site design and choices, nice and clean layout.
They use Epoch as their payment processor.
Small collection of tags (18) for navigation, but do seem to cover everything needed.
Models of both sexes are attractive. |
| Cons: |
Nearly every video starts with a 20 second ad for erection pills. The videos also end with a 2-5 minute interview with the models from the scene. Most scenes are only around 20-25 minutes total.
Very little variety in the models, one guy is in almost every scene. There isn't a model list, but most of the models (male and female) and in several of the scenes.
18 of the 71 scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck, not Bi Guys Fuck, some of these are not bisexual scenes, there are also bisexual females with one male scene. These scenes all venture away from the Bi Guys Fuck theme. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bisexual guys with a woman is one of my favorite niches in porn. I saw this one advertised as new on The Best Porn and happy to see it isn't owned by Mind Geek (pay for downloads), I took a chance. Once on the site, I got a nice surprise. They are currently having a 50% off sale on it.
This is niche that is hard to explain the attraction to. I prefer the scenes in this niche that at some point have the woman pull away while the guys have sex and she masturbates while watching. There's a few of those here.
The variety or lack of variety in models would be subjective to the viewer. One guy, looks to be Latino, handsome, very fit, is in nearly all of the scenes. He's even in the dumb advertisement they have at the beginning of most of the scenes. A ray of hope, possibly, the newest scene doesn't have the ad in it.
The scenes do lack much in the way of story which I believe is a weak point of this niche. It is one of the least creative niches and that goes for multiple bisexual sites I've tried. They sit on a bed, someone tells them to start and they're off to the races. I think in my darkest fantasies of this niche, the woman would walk in and catch her boyfriend/husband maybe getting a blowjob from his best guy friend then she would get involved. It could go the other way too. Boyfriend/husband walks in and catches his wife/girlfriend giving his best friend a blowjob.
These type of scenes are hard to find. TBP only listed 21 bisexual sites the last time I checked. You can find them on DVD series on various sites (Evil Angel has some) and the other option is Bi Empire that is now owned by Mind Geek. They require you to pay $15 extra to download.
The only part I thought was kind of cheap was the inclusion of two bisexual females with one man. There are only four of those scenes, but when you only have 71 scenes, it looks like the 71 scenes would at least live up to the site's name.
Of the other 71, the 18 Hot Guys Fuck scenes have a few that have bisexual males in them. Two are one on one male and female scenes. I would say 55 of the scenes have actual bisexual males content in them.
While it is a new site in listing here some of the scenes are dated back to 2015. Each scene has the same options: 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p.
I wouldn't say I'm disappointed. A lot of the videos I've found in this niche are 480p quality, so they do they at least have much better quality than I'm used to. A faster update schedule would help too. It's an above-average site with high quality videos for those that are into the bisexual male scenes. |
|
04-12-20 11:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
195
|
Couples Fantasies
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A near perfect site for me. Couples living out their fantasies with each other.
Touches on nerves and hormones that most porn doesn't ever get close to.
Four downloadable video options, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1920p.
I would have paid $15 for the 11 scenes on this site and been very happy about it. Instead, you get this site and 19 more.
Very attractive male and female actors.
I have watched each scene multiple times and probably will keep doing so. A site with this type of content being produced regularly would get me to join it on a lifetime membership. |
| Cons: |
Only 11 scenes. I know that's bad and maybe it will make my score look bad, but I have watched these 11 scenes more than the 500 I have on my hard drive.
Doesn't look like they will be updating it anymore, last update was in 2017.
The actors inability to speak English removes most of the bad acting and causes their actions to speak for them. |
| Bottom Line: |
The premise of these scenes is simple. There's a male/female couple and one of them has a fantasy or they both have the fantasy. Since there are only 11 scenes and I know there are people that want porn like this, I'm going to go over a few of them.
My Wife Wants to Squirt
The husband and wife invite in a third woman to teach the wife how to squirt. She starts with fingering the wife with the fully clothed husband watching. As the wife starts having orgasm(s), the husband walks over and pulls his dick out and starts jacking-off. The wife squirts, he cums and some of his cum even hits the woman assisting his wife.
Furtive Fingering By A Stranger
It's the fantasy us women like to say is not real. The shop owner Tiffany Doll is awaiting a package. I believe they are speaking Spanish or Portuguese. There was a man in the shop. Because I don't understand the language, I don't know if he was her husband or boyfriend. After he leaves, the delivery man brings a package and she's clearly attracted to him. They kiss deeply, he pushes her up on a counter, reminding yourself this is supposed to be a business anyone could walk in and he fingers her very hard, she even opens her shirt and bra. This is what makes these scenes different. She never touched his dick. There's no actual sex other than the fingering. It gives the realistic feel to the fantasy. He walks out of the shop like nothing happened.
One more is Turn Her On.
Male/female couple are attracted to a younger woman and they see her masturbating. The husband tells his wife to seduce her. They end up in a wild threesome.
This is the type of content I was first introduced to porn with. Vivid used to have this type of content and still do in the archives. It's the type of content that makes you wonder what you would do, it has a natural -- in the heat of the moment, feel to it.
The rest of the score comes from it being on a very good network with 19 other sites besides it. They seem to explore several areas of fantasies on their sites. I would compare the content to Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo, it's porn that does more than just physically arouse you.
I will add a lot of the stepfamily type porn also touches on similar nerves and hormones, but I find these more believable since they are saying "this is a committed couple and in the heat of the moment they agreed to do something committed couples usually don't." Maybe one day someone will make more content like this. Until then, I'll hope I don't wear my 11 videos out! |
|
02-17-20 11:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
196
|
Stiffia VIP
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large and varied network of 20 sites.
The site navigation is simple to use. It kind of reminds me of how Adult Time works with the sites going down the left margin.
The variance in sites doesn't seem to follow and reasoning, there is a Japanese site, a couple that look like just porn studios, and some that look like original productions (very good ideas on a few).
The models are a good blend of amateurs and pros.
An appreciated promo price through Porn Users, I really joined this network for 1 site, but it has offered more than the 1 site.
Billing processor is Vendo. I find them as easy to use as CCBill and Epoch. |
| Cons: |
The site is a little slow. It doesn't hurt download speeds or streaming speeds, but it loads slowly.
It has an advertisement for Gasm that never goes away. It looks like a pop-up ad and it blocks some of the content.
Some the site is not in English. I can figure out what Fotos are, but had to translate Canais and Porno Gratis, plus several others. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this network just for the site "Couple Fantasies". Despite its small size, I will write a separate review for it with the hopes someone out there will make a site with this type of content.
Several niches are explored on this network. Buttformation is one I liked, it combines exercising, women in tight workout clothes with sex that focuses on the butt, reverse cowgirl, cowgirl and plenty of views from the back of the curvy, athletic women.
Cosplay Babes is a B-level cosplay sites with costumes that look like something I could make. It seems contrived and forced.
Hot Gold is one I really liked. They have everything on it from transsexual orgies to public sex and these are amateurs with many of the women wearing non-obtrusive masks.
Some of the sites can be confusing. They have one called Inflagranti, it says Berlin, but Inflagranti is not a German word. The scenes include women having sex on cars, around cars, in garages then they have some 5 on 1 gangbangs. Maybe Inflagranti is a studio? I found myself wanting to connect the name to the type of content.
They have an uncensored Japanese site called JapanHD that seems authentic Japanese content not just Japanese models. I found some of these to be very erotic like when the blindfold the tiny Japanese models and use sex toys on them.
MMV is a very different site than I am used to. This does appear to be a studio with mature, very mature models and also BBW. There's no cohesiveness to any of this.
The Undercover Lover is interracial revenge type porn where the white woman has sex with the black man and records it for her cheating husband or cheating boyfriend to watch.
There's another Ebony, dark Asian, Latina site called WCP that's pretty good.
The rest of the sites do appear to be studios that are releasing videos that follow a theme or like they are part of a DVD.
The video quality is excellent. They have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 1920p on their newer videos, the older ones do lose the 1920p option, but they have a good backlog of HD videos.
I'm not usually one to join a network. I have 1-3 days max per week to spend more than 20 minutes on a site. The networks are just overwhelming to me and this one is too. I focused mostly on the Hot Gold and Couple Fantasies content. I did also download some of the Buttformation scenes.
This is one of the better networks I have tried. The slowdown is annoying. It just seems like the site has too much to try to load and that "Announcing Gasm" ad has to go away. There is no way to close it.
I like it better than than the American networks I've tried, except for Kink. When you have a language barrier as many of these scenes do you have to express the content with creativity and they do it well.
The site Couple Fantasies made this join worth the price. I don't know if I can get a good, full review of just the 11 scenes from it, but I think I can since I see it as very unique porn.
I would definitely recommend this network to those that haven't tried it. |
|
02-17-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
197
|
Ladies Fuck Gents
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor. |
| Cons: |
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons. |
|
02-02-20 10:10am
Replies (0)
|
Review
198
|
Strapon Power
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pure femdom strap-on action with women dominating men.
Only 60 scenes, but this is the rarest sub-niche of the pegging niche.
About half of the videos have 720p
More photo sets than videos, maybe the guys asked the videos to be removed? This network also has a site called Strap-On Sissies that is very similar. I think they moved some of the videos from here to it.
CCBill is the reliable biller. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think most men would enjoy this style of porn at all.
Should just be mixed with Strap-On Sissies, a nearly identical site on the network.
Updates seem to be recycled older scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Have you ever watched some hulking man in porn manhandle a little teen woman and force his dick up her ass while she screams? This is the payback! It’s not as hardcore or harsh as some I’ve seen, but what you have here are female models that stick 10 inch dildos up men’s asses, with more than a few of the scenes being the man lying on his back with his butt up in the air as the woman drives the dildo up his ass.
I typically don’t care for this sub-niche of pegging, but because they’re not as harsh here as I have seen, it’s really not bad. Usually in this sub-niche the woman will do nothing for the man and won’t let him touch her. She usually won’t even give him a reason to think he’s going to get anything except the abuse she hands out. There’s a little more allowing the men to touch the women here. Not much in the way of letting him get off until she tells him he can.
One of the most common themes on this site is the woman making the man dress up like a woman and she pelts him with “bitch” and yanks his wig. Being truthful even if it makes me look mean and bad, it’s kind of funny. I keep waiting on the woman to rip his wig off after forcing him to put it on.
This is not for everyone. It might not even be for hardly anyone, unless you can take a sense of humor into it. It’s clear these men could stop the woman and most of these women are quite attractive. Some of the women even look very uncomfortable in their newfound role of dominance. Some even look like they feel bad for the guy. They should record after the scene videos. I am sure most of these women apologized to the guys. Recycling aside, it’s very rare niche content I wouldn’t have found anywhere else. Sometimes I think this type of narrow niche porn is a welcome change to the common scenes we see on other sites. I will add this part for those into this sub-niche of pegging, their site Strap-on Sissies has over 125 scenes and it’s the exact sub-niche of Strap-On Power. And those come in the same network so if this is up your alley, they have close to 200 scenes of the female dominating the man and even making him dress up like a woman. |
|
02-02-20 10:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
199
|
Anal Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very pretty and young models having anal sex.
213 scenes, uneven updating schedule, sometimes 2 per month, sometimes 1 per month.
Excellent video quality and streaming interface, all videos are downloadable too as are photo sets.
Vendo for the biller.
No download limits that I have ran into.
Navigation works well. |
| Cons: |
These scenes – even with anal – are not that hardcore.
One I usually won’t mention as a female, but the guys on this site are not very attractive.
I think the language barrier causes some problems since these are scenes that look like they need a plot but can’t do so since the models aren’t English speakers. |
| Bottom Line: |
I run into sites like these more than I should. I usually don’t stereotype or have preconceived notions, but my thinking was this site would be at least medium hardcore. I thought that since it has anal in the title. It feels unfair to say this, but a lot of the guys on this site seem very young, inexperienced and even effeminate. Kind of like they are gothic or emo guys. That was a big turn-off for me.
The scenes, as I’m finding with these Russian sites, follow a very strict formula and there’s little to no dialogue I can understand. I speak and write English, four dialects of Hindi, but no Russian!
The quality is very good. All 213 scenes have at least 720p with the majority having 1080p and the newer ones having 4K. There are no download limits, you can also download the photos for each scene.
The female models are very pretty. I just really feel like either there’s a language barrier taking away from these scenes or they just make the same scene with different people from scene to scene. There’s a heavy formulaic feeling, the videos are not very long 20-25 minutes on most. I think I had too high of expectations coming into this site.
I am sure there are some that would like it. A lack of story, dialogue, really a lack of any personality from either the male or female and you end up with what it probably looked like the first time I had sex. Most of these female models would probably be better off in solo scenes. They're not showing much arousal other than seeing a naked guy with a hard dick. |
|
02-02-20 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
200
|
Strapon Tales
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Narrow niche content of women using dildos on men.
124 scenes, they seem to be recycling these. It’s still a high number for a limited niche.
Uses CCBill
Downloadable videos and screencaps.
This niche has two or maybe three different styles to it. This one leans towards the role-reversal side.
Easy to navigate as a whole. |
| Cons: |
I was told when a site has scenes that are showing up as their newest scenes and they are only 480p, but they have scenes from 3-4 years ago that are 720p, they are recycling and that’s what this site has. The newest update is listed as 2/1/2020 and it’s 480p.
Poor downloading options, most videos only have one resolution to download.
Screencap downloads are small in resolution and in quantity of photos (less than 30). |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is done best by Kink’s Divine Bitches. I was told to check this network out (Ferro) and that it has multiple pegging sites (women using dildos on men). This one falls under the sub-niche of role-reversal style. The couples seem to be in regular gender roles, kissing, groping each other, then the woman comes up with the idea of using a dildo on the guy. She doesn’t pressure him or dominate him. He goes along with it and it looks like a loving couple just exploring their sexuality with each other. I will review a couple of their other ones that do the other styles.
I have two reasons to think they are recycling. Newer videos have lower resolutions than older videos and the TBP 2015 review listed over 170 scenes on this site. There are only 124 scenes on it now in 2020. My guess is they’ve moved some of the scenes to their other pegging sites or possibly are recycling from site to site.
I know that’s a major con, but it is a very rare niche and for someone into it, it’s better than nothing. The best video quality I have seen on here is 720p and have seen more 480p. This sub-niche is my least favorite style of pegging. It’s like two loving people having dildo up the man’s ass sex. It doesn’t mesh well to me. I feel like if a married couple was into that it would be great for them but doubt, they would go around telling everyone.
The positive for me is it’s still an underrepresented niche and besides the lower video quality, the scenes are mostly 20 minutes or shorter. Most of these scenes are only in the 200MB file size. You can build a collection of these very quickly. I would rate the couples as “okay” attractive. It does lend to the feeling that maybe these are real couples. I scored it a little higher than I probably should since I do like the niche and the ease of use of the site. |
|
02-02-20 09:56am
Replies (0)
|
|
