Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
201
|
Old N Young
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Focus on older men with young women. In some scenes much older men. There are some realistic grandfather/granddaughter pairings.
Each scene has a video and picture set, both are downloadable.
One third of the scenes have up to 4K videos.
Vendo is the billing processor.
Videos average 30 minutes.
Has 128 scenes and is currently updating once a month. |
| Cons: |
Could use more updates.
The site has content back to 2007, there are full years with 0 updates, and it causes inconsistency in the video quality.
Same content as the site Old Goes Young |
| Bottom Line: |
Old-N-Young continues my exploration of the older/younger niche. This site has some scenes that I would rank as high as any older/younger scenes I have seen. A couple of these “old” guys seem to really turn the much younger women on. Some of the other scenes are not as good and you get the idea the model is just collecting a check.
The one man that looks like Santa Claus is the one they need to keep filming with. Some of the prettiest and hottest female models on the site are in scenes with him and they really are into him. There’s another man – I see no names listed for the men – with white hair and bald on top that is very sensual in the scenes, kissing, touching and these younger women don’t seem to be used to it so it’s very arousing to them.
The con I noticed most was the difference in video quality. On July 15, 2017, the site updated for the first time since October 16, 2015. All videos from July 15, 2017 to current have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. On November 9, 2014, the site updated for the first time since April 18, 2009! The videos between November 9, 2014 to October 16, 2015 have 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. There are 52 scenes between November 9, 2014 and current. The other 76 scenes are from 2009 and before. These 76 scenes vary in quality. Some have 720p, some top out at 540p, but that is something I see as a con for most people. I also believe that makes only 1 update per month a con since the newer scenes have very high video quality.
The action is usually good, the filming is good, it is formulaic and possibly that’s due to the age of the men? I would still recommend it for those interested in this niche. The exception to my recommendation is if you've been a member of Old Goes Young. There might be 3-4 scenes on here that it doesn't have, but everything else is the same exact content. |
|
02-02-20 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
202
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks. |
|
01-27-20 08:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
203
|
Teen Pies
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comical twist on creampie porn
Currently has 151 scenes including video and photos.
Very pretty models, very bad acting, it makes for a good mix here.
Cute outfits on most of the females, stockings, plenty of panty views and even knee high socks.
Bills through Epoch.
Videos have some story and are generally longer than most porn videos averaging 40-45 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
After 151 scenes of it the novelty starts to wear off. Almost all scenes are based around the premise that the guy will NOT cum inside her, so you have the shocked model face when he does.
This is a strange con for me, the outfits and silliness of some of these scenes reminds me of Scooby Doo.
Only two updates per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Scooby Doo con is the first time I ever thought that. It reminds me of if Shaggy was having sex with Velma and Scooby walked in. That’s not always a bad thing. The scenes are genuinely funny, sexy and won’t bother most people with the redundancy of the scenes almost all ending the same way.
The quality here is excellent. The videos all have 1080p as their top option for downloads. They have 3 smaller options as well. The photo sets are downloadable as are screencaps, but the photos are better in my opinion.
The models are very pretty and I’m sure they’re pros, but I don’t recognize a lot of them. The stories are going to require you to use your imagination. The two most common themes are older (30s, maybe 40s) man with a teen woman and he gets so excited during the sex he forgets to pull out or he pulls out at the last second. The other is the one requiring imagination as the men are supposed to be teens too and it’s supposed to be like first time sex for both the male and female with the male not being experienced enough to pull out when he cums.
It’s nothing groundbreaking, but they do give you a good, even if unbelievable, story that adds time to the scenes and gives time for teasing. |
|
01-27-20 08:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
204
|
She's New
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The 295 models here are supposed to be new to porn.
There are 262 scenes.
Downloadable videos, photos and screencaps.
Biller is Epoch
Videos often are in the hour long range, some are less, even as short as 30 minutes.
Very attractive, young models.
No clear update schedule, but they do update it. So far in January they only have 1 update, in December they had 5, in November they had 1. It at least has a decent sized archive of videos to hold you over for new releases. |
| Cons: |
I think the basis of the site might be a con. It says Only First Timers on each scene, maybe it means it’s their first-time filming with them? I have seen several of the models before.
There’s not much story or even purpose other than it’s supposed to be the models first scene. It’s very formulaic. The sex isn’t bad, and the attractiveness of the models makes the story less important. It’s kind of like watching casting porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site’s popularity has to be because of the looks of the models. They’re all comfortably in the 18-22 range, most are thin, but there are a few bustier ones. The finger in the mouth, “I’m innocent” look is common here. The models are more likely to catch your eye than the plots. Most of the scenes start like a casting type scene. The model talks and answers questions for about 7-12 minutes, she then strips and teases for 5-8 minutes, then the sex starts, and it becomes very formulaic from there. I’m not familiar with some of these models, but there are at least half of them that I have seen on other sites.
The download options are easy to use, and all scenes have 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and mobile options. You can download the photo sets and if you like, you can download the screenshots too.
There’s come credit due on the interview portions of the videos. The models do a good job of playing innocent, excited, anxious and often give quick upskirts or upshort views. They have playful attitudes towards the questions, and I found myself enjoying these interviews as much as the formulaic sex.
Beyond that, I didn’t like this site as much as I thought I would. Maybe I’m just burning out on the casting style sites? It’s definitely not the fault of the models. There are some really cute and really pretty models here. It’s just a style a porn I think we’ve been overloaded with. How many more models are going to be shocked to see an 8” dick? |
|
01-27-20 08:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
205
|
Innocent High
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the premier schoolgirl sites.
Bills through Epoch.
They have 468 scenes, but the updates have slowed greatly.
Each scene has a video, photo set and screencaps, all can be downloaded.
Newer scenes are using variations on the traditional schoolgirl outfit and those are some of the best on the site.
Good site for those into fetishes, besides the outfits.Nearly all scenes depict an older man (teacher or tutor) with a young woman. There also is light to mild spanking in most scenes.
Almost all of the scenes have a short story to start (late for class, didn’t do homework, was caught cheating on a test). |
| Cons: |
Since April 2019 there have been only 5 updates. They are averaging about 1 update per 2 months.
They could have more lesbian scenes to cut back on the monotony of older male, younger female in every scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High’s oldest scenes shows it started out as strictly a schoolgirl site with the models in the older videos all wearing the same outfit based on the fictional “Innocent High”. The newer scenes still have the schoolgirl outfits in most scenes, but they are no longer branded with the Innocent High logo on the uniforms like the old ones. This is an improvement. Other changes in the newer scenes include older female teachers having sex with younger male students. They also have started leaning on the home tutoring and home testing to give the scenes a different setting than just the same classroom they used in the earliest scenes.
The archive of content here helps offset the slow update schedule with 468 scenes you’re more likely to get bored with the content than run out of content. This site has been around a long time. The earliest scenes go back to 2005. Those scenes have a top video resolution of 576p. By 2011 they started adding 720p and 1080p resolution videos.
You basically have a handful of scenarios here: Student (male or female) is late for class, didn’t turn in homework, said a “bad” word in class and the teacher makes them stay after class as punishment. The spanking here is as much playful as it is serious though the lightest skin models do show the handprints on their butts. The newer scenes are more reminiscent of stepfamily porn even though there are no stepfamily scenes. The student goes to the teacher or tutor’s house or the teacher goes to the student’s house for extra credit and they sneakily have sex in the bedroom with the door closed or in the living room before the student’s parents come home. It does get redundant at times, but the girls are cute, the outfits are too, and the scenes are long. There’s more teasing early in these scenes than a lot of porn has in it.
This is a niche that seems to have lost its popularity in American porn, but if you’re a schoolgirl fan you’ll likely be pleased with this site. |
|
01-27-20 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
206
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Old and young niche plus teacher and student niche.
There are 237 scenes. Each has a video and downloadable photos.
Includes 30 other sites with several having the old and young niche.
Newest videos include the option to download in 4K.
Streaming player works above average.
Network is easy to use and each site is even easier to use with some faults.
Mostly average to cute looking models. |
| Cons: |
It looks like there is a way to search by each sites models, but it doesn't work when I do it. It just shows all the models for all their sites.
It looks like they update once a month.
Few of these sites are that strong by themselves, but as a whole the network is pretty good.
Video quality can be inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
My moods towards porn change often. I was looking for old and young porn, a more common theme in real sex in my home country. I saw several sites on this network that have the old and young theme. I think if you like that niche joining this network is a good choice. They have at least 4 old and young sites on the network. In my experience, a site with 250+ scenes is doing pretty good.
The theme here doesn't always work out how I would have preferred. I like the in classroom scenes, but a lot of these are older tutor goes to younger students house to help them with their homework and they have sex. Some scenes are outdoors too. The sexual parts are as good as any of the older with younger niche scenes I've seen. There's not much story or dialogue. The girls seem to be as much if not more into the scenes than the men are. Maybe that's part of the niche? The men seem surprised the young, cute models are attracted to them.
One of the newest scenes has a 4K option, 1080p, 720, 480p and 360p options as well. If you go back 4 pages into the updates, 8 pages total, you will start finding obscure resolutions like 468p and 286p and those are the best options for the second half of the content. It looks like this site has been around a long time and they just update very slowly.
The content is good for the niche. The men are as energetic as they can be. Some of the men are not in that "really old" group. They look more like 40's, maybe 50's. Some of the others look 60's and 70's. The female models look 18-24, most are slim, small built and are very poor actresses!
The amount of content between this site and the other older/younger sites on the network make it a good buy in my opinion. |
|
01-13-20 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
207
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A network of 30 sites that would have scored higher if not for help from reading other PU reviews.
This network has a very good, broad range of content, but it seems the content is used from other sites (Teen Mega World) and others too. It doesn't make it bad as I've not been a member on those sites.
Thirty sites, 3,600 videos, 500,000 photos, 1,182 models.
Was joining through the TBP link at $19.95, but when I got to the sign-up page they had a New Year's special for $9.95.
Vendo is the payment processor.
My main reason for joining was the older men/younger women content, they have Tricky Old Teacher, Old Goes Young, Anal Old Young, She Made Us Lesbians (older lesbian with two younger women), Daddies and Darlings, and there's just a general theme of older/younger on the network. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure which sites are updating. It says the latest update was on December 27th, 2019, I assume that is for the whole network.
No dates on the scenes that I've seen.
Pre-checked cross sale on sign up. |
| Bottom Line: |
Having not been into joining porn sites for a long time there's a lot of content that's going to sneak by me without me knowing it was on other sites. I read a few of the PU reviews that mention some of this content is available on Teen Mega World, which I've not been a member of. That makes it difficult to review since if I never join Teen Mega World, I won't know that this content was available there too and I did get this whole network for $9.95.
The female models seem to be from the Eastern European (slim, small boobs, small butts) pool of models and the men are more times than not, older, some even gray-headed and look to be 2-3 times as old as the females.
The old/young sites on this network average 200-300 scenes, they have a good selection of video options from 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and even 2160p. Each video also has photo downloads.
There does seem to be a couple of common themes. There are cuckold sites, women using strap-ons on men (pegging) and women being in the dominant role. There are multiple older/younger sites including older men with younger women and younger men with older women. There are virgin based sites like Shabby Virgins, Spoiled Virgins and 18 year old Virgins. The Shabby Virgins one might be the most out of touch with reality site in porn. It's older women that are supposed to be virgins having sex with multiple younger men.
While I do feel like this is frustrating to know this content and maybe more of it is available on other sites, the $9.95 price for nearly 4,000 scenes with excellent download options makes it a better deal for me than maybe for others that have joined the sites this content is also on.
The navigation works well. You can browse by site, by model or by tags. As someone that has looked over Teen Mega World since the only scenes I would really be interested on it are the Younger/Older ones, maybe it's better this way to get all those scenes without the thousands of other scenes mixed in?
I also think that's who a network like this would be aimed at. It's like they've taken specific niches from another network and made it into a more simplified network. I ended up with just over 700 scenes I downloaded so I can't really complain about that for the $9.95 price.
I think others should at least look into it to see if maybe it would benefit them the way it did me. I'm pleased with the membership with just the one frustration with the thought there is more of the content I like on another site. |
|
01-06-20 10:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
208
|
Moms Teach Sex
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, cliched, stepfamily site with above average stories, believable or not -- is up to you to decide.
Gorgeous female models, the daughters, the moms, most of the guys are average looking.
Two updates per month, follows an episode count, season count, similar to a television show, but I don't see any connection from scene to scene.
1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 270p video options, photo sets and screen captures can be downloaded.
111 scenes currently, videos last 30 minutes plus and have acting so bad it's good.
At least most of the mother/daughter pairs look like they have enough age separation to be mother/daughters. |
| Cons: |
If bad acting bothers you this become a huge con. Nearly every scene has the moment where the daughter sees the guy's dick and her eyes bug out of her head or the mom walks in on the daughter doing something sexual with the guy and her eyes bug out of her head.
I wish they would update more often. I have a year membership to the network and it seems like they could at least get this site up to 1 new update per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems I've fallen into two traps in the porn internet industry. I either end up on a site that makes me pay extra for downloads or I end up on a site with stepfamily porn.
I think as someone not raised in the United States the taboo of stepfamily porn is much higher since I really didn't know any divorced families growing up in India.
This site is still small enough that you're not going to feel like there's too much content to see everything or download everything you want. At 111 scenes it's enough to keep you stocked up on stepfamily porn, but not too much to make you feel like you'll never even see the previews of all the content.
This one works well and the quality is very high with 5 different video resolutions available for downloads. The models on here are mostly young, slim and fit (to fit the daughter role) and the mothers are the hot MILF types. You kind of feel like the guy would be lucky to be with either the mom or daughter let alone both of them!
Because I have a year membership it's giving me a better chance to stream and decide which ones are worth downloading. The streaming player works very well. So far, I have downloaded about 50% of the scenes. As much as I like the bad acting, I grew up watching Bollywood movies, some of it is so over the top I can't even get passed how bad the acting is. My tip to sites with these stepfamily scenes is to not have the scenes where the mom "hears" sex going on and acts like she doesn't know what it is so she must go check.
This site would score higher if the scenes were a little longer (45 minutes or more), had more story and didn't follow a similar structure in each scene.
There are some scenes that become too formulaic feeling. Daughter in cowgirl, mom in missionary, daughter in doggystyle, mom in reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
It's still a very good site and part of the problem could just be the year membership. It's another good entry into the stepfamily porn niche with excellent quality making up for poor acting. |
|
01-06-20 09:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
209
|
Adult Mobile, formerly Mile High Media
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the first networks I joined and was once a favorite.
Comes with Doghouse Digital, Sweetheart Video, Reality Junkies and Sweet Sinner.
4,249 videos, each video comes with a photo set
Doghouse Digital has some of the best m/m/f bisexual scenes available anywhere.
Almost 1,500 models. |
| Cons: |
The last time I was a member this network was owned by Gamma. It's now owned by Mind Geek, the very group I said I wouldn't join another site from and here I am again.
Good join price of $7.99, add $14.99 if you want to download. This group is terrible for this practice.
ProBiller is the billing processor. You get to either chat with someone that tries to upsell you other memberships or doesn't cancel the account and you get charged for another month. I've got to where I just email a cancellation notice to them and that seems to work, but it's still frustrating to cancel. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined Mile High Media it was for their Bisexual MMF scenes. I would have rated it a 90 or higher back then.
Now, it seems Mind Geek owns the site and they're back to their typical charge extra for downloads nonsense and requiring you to jump through a dozen hoops to cancel through their billing processor. It's hard to explain just how much something this small can completely ruin the user's experience.
I paid the $14.99 extra for downloads. When I was a member before I didn't download anything since I only had a small hard drive in my laptop. I bought an external hard drive a few months ago and wanted to download some of these scenes. What seemed like a good deal ended up costing $23.
The bisexual scenes have not been updated since I was last a member in 2015. It looks like they've made Biempire a different standalone site. At this point, it's like saying "who knows?" There's a surprise around every corner, a new charge, a new promotion for another site and it never ends.
The overall content here is okay, most of it is normal hardcore that you could get from a DVD site. There's very little that stands out.
The newer videos have 4K option if you pay for downloads.
You can't even download the photo sets without paying for the downloads.
The amount of content is impressive at over 4,000 scenes, but the navigation limits how easy it is to find what you're looking for. The categories are vague and limited. If you use the search box you either have to search by model name or scene name, like you're going to know the names of DVDs you've not seen? You can't just search for a category or niche. I searched "bisexual" it only brings up scenes with bisexual in the name, so just "bi" wouldn't show up. Searching "transsexual" brings up nothing, but reducing it to "tranny" brings up a whole series.
Neither bisexual or transsexual/tranny are listed in the categories you can choose from.
They have a good selection of 1,500 professional models, but they are making these sites way too frustrating to use and too hard on the purse to keep joining them. I really don't understand the Biempire part. If you look on TBP, Biempire's review says it comes with "Your membership comes with network access to Mile High Media. Other hot sites include Doghouse Digital, Sweet Sinner and Reality Junkies."
It had 133 scenes at the time of the TBP review and was updating in 2017. On Mile High Media, the newest bisexual scene is 2015 and there's only 79 bisexual scenes. Maybe porn sites should start competing to see who can confuse their customers the most?
I really don't know if it's worth taking the risk to join Biempire. I'm guessing they're going to have the same pay for downloads problem. I now need a filter button to block myself from joining sites ran by Mindgeek. |
|
12-09-19 10:32pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
210
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photos only site with nude but not very explicit, tasteful photos of beautiful models.
Total of 2,495 photo sets and 1,072 models.
Currently averages 9-10 updates per month.
Model list and favorites section.
Photos are downloadable in zips, newest sets are 3700x5800 in resolution. |
| Cons: |
No videos with the site.They have videos, but they are staff selection videos and cost extra to download.
For a photos only site some of the photo sets are very small (30 pictures)
Most models are nude for the entire set. |
| Bottom Line: |
This seems like a site that would have been popular 10 or more years ago. The models are pretty, though hardly no variety in model types, race or body types. The photos do go fully nude, but they are not very explicit unless you consider a butt hole explicit. I noticed their updates have slowed considerably over the years. From 2018 to late 2019, they have dropped from 24 updates per month to 8-9 updates per month.
The pictures are very good quality at over 11px with 3700x5800 resolution, but the lack of videos and slowing of updates does cause some longtime concern for this site. The scenes feel like they lack imagination or vision. A lot of the poses are what I would call "non-sexual" as there's very little touching of themselves in these sets. The site is at least big with nearly 2,500 photo sets and over 1,000 models, but at times it doesn't even feel like porn. It's more like watching a woman walk around naked for no apparent reason.
The inclusion of a films tab made me think they have videos, but they do not. The films are Staff Selection and cost $3.99 to $4.99 each to view and download. You can watch a free 30 second clip of each. I was most surprised by how small some of the photo sets were, a full photo set with only 32 photos on a site that has no videos? That would be my biggest suggestion. Have larger photo sets (200-300 photos) to make up for the lack of videos.
You shouldn't have any navigation problems since there's only updates, model list and photos to go through. My overall feeling is it's not a complete site. There's something missing, more pictures or any videos. As it is, it's a back to the basics very soft photo site that doesn't even bring in many clothing fetishes. I thought this was a site like Bare Maidens where there's more of a theme to the photo sets. |
|
12-09-19 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
211
|
ALS Scan
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A lot of slim, shaven, very cute, girl next door type models. Many are pros without their makeup.
2,959 videos, 3,276 photo sets and 435 models.
Averages over 1 update per day, interviews are rare, interviews are rare but are included, also remastered sets of older sets, most are solo and lesbian scenes.
They work on the girl-crush meter with models like Vina Skyy and Allie Addison.
Site is simple to use. Easy to join and cancel.
Photo sets, at times, trump the videos, with extreme close-ups in huge resolution that shows how wet the models are. |
| Cons: |
I find the models to be an overall mixed lot. It's subjective, Vina Skyy and Allie Addison are two of my current favorites, but there are just as many models I don't even check out.
Some of the extreme penetrations take away from the eroticism of the content. Vina has a set where she "whisks" her pussy with a kitchen whisk. It's not solid and it's wiry. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second time joining this site. I didn't review it the previous time. I think it's way up there in the teen category and with the slimmer models, but I'm not always in the mood for the cutesy teens.
I decided to join again when I saw they have new content of Vina Skyy and Allie Addison, two models that couldn't possibly be more different, but I have a huge girl-crush on both of them. Vina has 7 videos, including the much anticipated ride on the Sybian and 7 photo sets. Allie has 5 videos and 5 photo sets. They are not the only models I joined for, but when I join a site this big, I try to make sure there are some new sets of my girl-crush models and then look through the archives.
I like that they are remastering old, popular sets as it's helping me find some models I probably wouldn't have looked far enough back to find.
The videos have a broad range of masturbation. Toys, fingers, gynecological tools, kitchen utensils, fruits, vegetables, Sybian, Magic Wands, they should work on getting royalties for these products!
The majority of the scenes are solo and many of the lesbian scenes are only so-so. Others have mentioned the tropical trips and I finally downloaded those. Those are some of the best lesbian scenes I have seen as they look to be improvised. I mentioned in the pros that I believe some of the photo sets are better than the videos. The photo sets are deep and even engaging, some are in the 200 range of photos, others go as high as nearing 400. These are not screen captures and you can tell good care is put into getting the most explicit views.
Something I believe this site offers that others don't is the girls are not all made up, it's not a glamour site even though some sets might look that way. I have seen models on here that I'm familiar with on other sites and realized how much I like them even if I didn't before.
the video quality is great with 4K on newer videos and 1080p or 720p on sets as far back as 2008. The photo sets besides being large in quantity of photos come in zip downloads and in their largest size are 3000x4500, the Vina Skyy photos were enough reason for me to join. I don't think I've ever seen a model that gets so naturally creamy and wet in just a photo shoot.
The cancellation process is as simple as setting your account not to rebill and you also have favorites where you can store your favorite models or scenes. I am happier with the site than I expected to be. I sometimes find these cute model sites to be more annoying than arousing, but they have enough of those cute models that are very good at being arousing to make it a great site. Something I will end with is something I have mentioned in other reviews. I like that they have less than 500 models, but have over 6,000 videos/photo sets combined. It gives you a chance to get multiple sets of the models you like and makes it feel like they are selective about their models. |
|
12-02-19 11:12pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
212
|
Kink.com
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first non-mainstream sites I joined were Kink sites and they all come in one big package now.
They are showing 87 channels by my count and seem to be adding new ones every month, some seem to just be previews for mainstream sites (Spizoo, DDF).
Kink is highly consistent with their content and as great as some of it, it can be just as frustrating, that's the consistency. You won't see many "just okay" scenes. You will see a lot of great/wow scenes and a lot of that's just terrible scenes.
Over 13,500 scenes and they average 1 new scene per day. If you're a photo collector they have photos on some, others don't.
4,480 models, for me, it always surprises me to see a mainstream or glam type model on here, but there are a lot of them. Some seem to really enjoy working for Kink others look like they realized it's not for them.
I think overall they have the best production values, planning, screening, choices of models for each type of scene of any site or network. |
| Cons: |
It's a lot of porn to look through. I have had a year membership for 2 of the last 3 years and I am pretty sure there's content I still haven't seen.
The loss of passion or energy on some of the sites. I guess it's best that they stop updating those sites and just let them die off, but they've had a lot of good ideas they didn't seem to give time to develop. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only thing stopping me from rating this network a 100 is I don't like how they're adding content from other sites. I really like the DDF Network, but I don't see how their content, even if just a sampling, belongs on Kink and the same with Spizoo. It's like in some cases the best addition is subtraction.
Before the Kink Network was formed, I had been a member of these Kink sites as standalone sites: Hogtied, Device Bondage, Water Bondage, Sex and Submission multiple times, Public Disgrace, Divine Bitches multiple times, Wired Pussy, Electrosluts and Fucking Machines. I would have rated each of those between 88-95. Math was my worst subject, but I'm just that justifies the 99 score for the whole network.
Also a part of my high score is based on the value. I have joined a year membership twice at $79.95, that's a lot of sites and a lot of different, unique content to keep you occupied for a very cheap price. It makes me think of those commercials that say "for less than a daily cup of coffee" you can have 365 days of whipping, spanking, mechanized sex machines, women wrestling, and just a lot of sex.
It's an impossible task to cover this entire network in a review of 5,000 characters, but I do think the overall point can be made.
I never owned an external hard drive until I joined the Kink Network. I just used my computer's hard drive. There is still a feeling of a community at Kink. The comments on scenes are usually more interesting than anything on my social media accounts. Sometimes they are damning comments that show the aggressive side the content brings out, it's not uncommon to see comments like, "You let that bitch off easy" and there are other nicer comments like, "Beautiful model, excellent execution and production of the scene."
I think that is the whole selling point of Kink. When they get a scene right they really get it right. There are scenes here that make you believe Isis Love or Dragon Lily really convinced that hardcore, straight man to bend over and take a dildo up his butt just for the chance to get to be with her in the way he wants. They have scenes that are very good, but make you wonder what the point of them were (The Upper Floor, Everything Butt).
Some of the Sex and Submission scenes which I think it probably their most consistently good site, show that bondage, rough sex, can be done in a loving and caring way that ignites the carnal nature of both the male and female.
I found the sites with water torture to be some of the most intriguing and even exciting scenes I have seen from any niche. You see what you don't want to see and that's a near panic from the model and Kink's expertise in timing, understanding how long is safe and care for their models pulls them to safety at what seems like the last second.
I think their one site that goes "too far" is Fucking Machines. I can't imagine what some of those women feel like after what looks to be 5 or more orgasms and the machine is still going at top speed. You are going into the area of the limitations of the human body.
The Electro sites bring both a laugh and shake of the head. I remember using a Magic Wand once that sparked from a blown fuse, so I can only imagine what it's liked to have your clitoris constantly shocked and sparked.
That's where Kink does their best work. They seem to be genuinely concerned and set on protecting their models so they have a wild, exciting, maybe once in a lifetime experience with very little risk for injury. I think that type of content appeals to those that maybe are not just into porn for the sex. You are seeing humans reaching ecstasy and bliss without even reaching orgasm.
Public Disgrace offers what I think is the best exhibitionism experience. And in my review of it, I said and do believe, some of the indoor scenes are the best they have. The ones in locations where we as normal people can imagine us being like a movie store or bar. It's a situation we can relate to unlike any of us really having a bedroom of all white bedding, curtains blowing in the wind like many sites try these these days.
There's a realness to it even if it's extreme and that's the appeal. Maybe the extreme isn't that unrealistic and once your mind starts thinking that the fantasies and dreams start being formed.
If I had one request of them it would be more content like they have on Divine Bitches or even TS Seduction. These are situations/scenarios where we could possibly in our fantasies see them really happening and that causes our minds to decide what we would do in those situations. Most of the time, in our fantasies, we would do what we probably wouldn't in real life. I see porn as an avenue for generating thoughts and fantasies I normally would not have as it's hard to fantasize about something you've never thought about or done.
It is my choice of best network/site and I think my review shows why and shows how genuine I am in this high of a score. |
|
11-18-19 10:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
213
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An older Kink site that adds an athletic twist to the world of lesbian porn.
Nearly 1,000 scenes.
The scenes are enjoyable in sections. I found myself fast-forwarding a lot, but the good parts were worth it.
The site seemed to change over the years and the best scenes included a female model referee that would also get involved.
Loser has to do what the winner wants (oral, strap-on).
Fun mismatches that carry a sub/dom side-story to them.
Multi-women team matches were the best for me. |
| Cons: |
If there ever was a site that needed video scenes downloadable by part, it was this one. I found that I watched the last 20 minutes more than the first 40 minutes.
I didn't really understand the scoring system. It does seem to be staged to reach the desired ending.
Has not updated in over a year. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was an athletic woman growing up, soccer/lacrosse/field hockey, but I never tried wrestling with other girls. That just seems like it's asking for a porn shoot to happen!
I have read a lot of the other reviews on Ultimate Surrender and agree with most of the other feelings. This site had its high points (Dragon Lily's reign, Isis Love's reign, the live matches in front of crowds), but besides those you are mostly receiving a lesbian site with an athletic theme added to it.
For all the corniness in porn, I can appreciate how Kink used that with this site. What person hasn't looked at a beautiful woman in a bikini with her legs spread open? Here they have no choice as the opponent has their legs spread open and won't let go. You do get the feeling there is something athletic happening. I saw a couple of scenes were a model seemed to seriously sprain her ankle and they really are sweating unlike those scenes where there is some spritzing them with a water bottle to create the sweat effect.
If the site is not going to start updating again, I would really like a scene of the most prolific models on here, Dragon Lily, Isis Love and maybe one of the producers talking about how much of it was staged and maybe telling if they had matches where the women really got competitive and even angry with each other. I watched a couple where the women looked very upset with each other and their muscles were shaking from the force they were using.
You have to think something like that would/could happen and it would give an interesting view of the content to go back and watch it.
They have nearly 1,000 scenes, Kink's streaming player works as well as any and some scenes are worth downloading. I think the models in these scenes are maybe more important to these scenes than the majority of sites. A lot of it goes into in good taste, in bad taste. One of the injury matches had a woman that was probably 6' 200 pounds vs a woman that was 5' 110 pounds. And the heavier woman knocking the smaller one down and falling on her caused the injury.
I think this niche could be expanded on and seriously improved. I have only watched the Evolved Fights scenes on Kink and they do focus on fixing some of the problems the Ultimate Surrender matches have. They also have Dragon Lily as their referee.
Ultimate Surrender is a great site for what it is. Those that like women in tight or skimpy clothes, rolling around, tearing at each other's clothes, would find a lot to like here. The sex is mostly the same sex you will find on any lesbian site. It is a little rougher sex here than most lesbian sites. I would say focus on finding the Dragon Lily, Isis Love and live scenes. The scenes besides those have a more generic feel to them.
A fun, different and unique site. |
|
11-18-19 09:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
214
|
X Empire
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Four very specific sites in 1 network, Erotica X, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Over 1,300 scenes on the 4 sites combined and the network updates once per day.
461 models, all are professional models.
Site works well, you can view the newest content from the network page which shows content from all 4 sites or you can go directly to one of the sites.
Quality is very high and videos have 8 download options, up to 4K on newer scenes.
Photo sets are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a lot of Gamma sites and always thought their cancellation process was very easy. Not this one, I entered my login and solved the captcha, it said I had to call to verify my account. I chose to chat and was on the chat for nearly 20 minutes.
The scenes on these 4 sites are some of the most redundant I have seen. I'm not saying they are bad, but I think there's a script and a timer that buzzes to switch positions. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was feeling positive about this network when I first joined it. I still am positive about it, but it started to feel like a letdown the further I got into the membership.
The four site format sounds like a good idea, but there's very little balance between the sites. Hard X has 664 scenes on it, Erotica X has just over 300, Lesbian X has just under 140 and Dark X has just over 200. I think it's for good reason too.
The Hard X and Erotica X scenes seem to have more time and thought put into them. Dark X is a lot like Blacked, but not as good. Lesbian X is a lot like Sapphic Erotica, but not nearly as good. Those sites are still updating, but you can see they are not their focus as a network and are not their strength.
All of the content on all 4 sites has a very sameness feel to them. The earliest scenes on Hard X almost look like a completely different site. Hard X is the best of the 4 sites even though it has a sameness from scene to scene in newer scenes. Erotica X looks to have the potential, but maybe they change producers? You will get 2-3 good scenes in a row, then 2-3 scenes that aren't even worth clicking on. And those are the two stronger sites of the 4.
I was talking to another PU member that is also a member and we both said the scenes feel like watching a cooking show. They roll the cookies out (position change), they put the cookies in oven (change position), they remove the cookies from the oven (change position) and they eat the cookies (cumshot). It is that timed and specific.
It doesn't make it bad. It just makes it feel like the scenes have very little thought going into them or effort. It makes the success of each scene dependent on the models in the scene. There are some with models that are excellent and seem to enjoy every minute of the sex while there are some that look like they are waiting on the buzzer to go off to change positions.
The videos are excellent quality to download. I didn't really like their streaming player. I used it 5 times and had multiple buffering moments in each scene. I don't think it was an internet problem, but it could have been. The newer scenes are available in up to 4K resolution (still waiting on Santa to bring me a 4K monitor), they look good enough to watch on 720p and even better at 1080p. The photo sets are not Met-Art or DDF quality, but they are okay and can be downloaded.
There's just an overall feeling of "it's okay" and that's how I feel about it. |
|
11-18-19 08:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
215
|
Kink Men
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Kink's gay network has plenty of content for straight women too.
Includes six sites - 30 Minutes of Torment, Bound Gods, Bound in Public, Butt Machine Boys, Men on Edge and Naked Kombat.
Mostly very masculine, muscular men.
Other gay sites are included, but are not listed including Yes Sir Boys, Bound and Gagged, Boynapped and My Dirtiest Fantasy.
High Kink production values. |
| Cons: |
Four of the listed sites are no longer updating.
Scenes can be very repetitive.
Very little masturbation |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a fetish for watching men masturbate. It's not one that is easily fulfilled. There is some masturbation here, but most of what they have here is similar to the straight Kink content.
Thirty Minutes of Torment is a man being bound, touched, whipped, spanked and put through 30 minutes of torment by another man. These scenes are okay. There's only so much believable safe pain before it starts to become uncomfortable to watch and this site, for me at least, pushes that limit.
Bound Gods is probably the best of the sites and it's a very large site that is still updating. While it's not much different from Thirty Minutes of Torment, there is less of a violent edge to it. It has nearly 600 scenes in its back catalog and there are varying themes which is also different than Thirty Minutes of Torment. You see the production values more on this site.
Bound in Public is a lot like their straight site Public Disgrace. You have a group of men dominating one man and while it says public, a lot of the scenes are not in public. It would appeal to those into male exhibitionism which I think is very rare. It's not a small site either at over 240 scenes, but it is no longer updating.
Butt Machine Boys is the closest the network comes to male masturbation and is the gay version of Fucking Machines. Men use the powered and motorized dildos on themselves while masturbating. I do like this content quite a bit as there is a common theme with all of these sites have muscular men on them. It only has around 150 scenes and isn't updating, but for those into male masturbation they might want to download all of the scenes.
Men on Edge is the most unique site of these. The scenes while not much different than the other sites on this network, bring in some story and there's more of a feeling of dominance which isn't easy to do with two males. This is another bigger site at over 300 scenes and it is still updating.
My feeling with this content is they tried to go for male/gay versions of their straight sites and the men just aren't flexible enough to perform the scenes the way the female performers do. Some of the content is very sexy, while some of it just makes me look away. There doesn't seem to be much of a middle ground.
They also have the gay site Naked Kombat that is their gay version of Ultimate Surrender. It has the same positives and negatives as the female version. Some of it looks planned/staged as the action seems to change at the same time in each scene. There are cringe-worthy moments like a guy having his dick in another man's butt and the guy falling back on his dick.
There are multiple other gay channels including the ones I listed in the pros. They have 7 other ones and a bisexual male site with male/male/female scenes. These look like licensed content from larger standalone sites.
The videos follow a Kink standard of the largest available resolution being 1280x720, their streaming player works well which is important for me on a network like this. It let's me scan through the scene to see if there's going to be parts I would be interested in.
With Kink's production values I think they could do better with the gay genre. I would like to see them take the bisexual niche and do something like a male masturbating with a female in a cell watching him and a male in another cell watching him. Whichever one orgasms first gets to have sex with him. I think that shows why I don't score this site higher. It just feels like they took the straight content and made it into gay content without really putting any thought into the scenes.
It's not bad and is one of the better gay sites I have been a member of. I would think it appeals to gay men more than straight women and it's good if that's your interest.
The score would be lower if not for the very attractive, athletic men they feature. |
|
11-12-19 01:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
216
|
Hogtied
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best bondage sites available.
Comes with the Kink network.
Updates twice per month and has a huge back catalog of over 1,300 scenes, they have been releasing scenes here since 1998!
Very graphic positions that show everything.
One of the few sites that convinces me this pain is pure pleasure.
Great selection of models including many you wouldn't expect to see on a bondage site.
Very easy join and cancel options, it's much improved over how it was a year or so ago. |
| Cons: |
Kink's sites are plagued with one common con. They are niche-orientated and can become repetitive.
I would like to see more action between the male and female, most of the scenes are simply the male using a vibrator or powered dildo on the hogtied female. |
| Bottom Line: |
While watching some of these scenes I realized that Kink uses almost no airbrushing or cover-up on the models and I think it's why I like the network show much. One of the newer scenes has a model that looks like she recently gave birth to a child or was once very overweight. She has stretch marks on her stomach, very attractive model and instead of covering those stretch marks they seem to make a point of showing them throughout the scene. It's a refreshing twist in the body image dominated porn land.
This site is huge. It's hard for me to even comprehend some of this content was released when I was underage! Major points for making me feel young!
The concept is simple. The rope master or vibrator king ties a woman up in a sexual position, he then uses a vibrator, sometimes a powered dildo and then they switch her position. This is where you see their experience. The camera zooms in right as the powered dildo penetrates the model. The orgasms get full attention. There is use of hot wax, there are positions men are always talking about not seeing enough of like the model laying on her stomach with her ass up in the air complete with a perfect back arch.
It's as erotic and sexy as you can make women being tied up and "abused".
The videos are downloadable in multiple resolutions, the top is only 1280x720, but those do have a 5000+ bitrate and are very clear. They have four other smaller options to download as well. The scenes are relatively long (40-50 minutes).
My biggest complaint is I would like to see more action between the male and female. I know it would be hard to get the guy into position to have sex with the hogtied woman, but I think it would break some of the monotony.
The models do a good job of getting themselves into sexy positions. I think the best is on their knees with their feet under the ass and pussy sticking out. It seems to be the one that works best for the model too.
I have to think this is the one of the longest running, still-updating sites there is with scenes from 22 years ago and still 2 new updates per month. I think the scene with Alexis Tae might be worth the price of the membership by itself. She seems genuinely innocent and new to bondage. The male is quite rough with her, but she is very much into it and you can see her becoming more into it as the scene goes.
The scenes also include a downloadable zip of images, some of the older scenes don't have them, but the majority do. It's a site that doesn't seem like it would be very erotic and it might not be to some, but I like it a lot. I didn't score it as high as some of the other Kink sites as the niche is very narrow and repetitiveness does create the feeling of some of the scenes being too similar. They do include waterboarding, ball gags and throw just about everything at the model -- while she's hogtied.
A very good site overall. |
|
11-12-19 12:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
217
|
Sis Loves Me
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Team Skeet Standalone/Premium site that is excellent.
209 scenes with 6-7 updates per month.
Cute models, mostly teen, but some older ones.
Long scenes, some as long as an hour, stories that are usually corny, but fun.
Video quality whether streaming or downloading is top-notch, up to 1080p, with 720p, 480p and mobile available.
Each scene has a full-length video, trailer, photos and screencaps, and they are downloadable.
The biller is Epoch. |
| Cons: |
Is very similar to their site Family Strokes which I'm also currently a member of. I like both sites equally.
Some might not like the silly stories.
Model list defaults to the model list for the Team Skeet network instead of just showing the models on Sis Loves Me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have tried joining a couple of these Team Skeet standalone sites over the last 4-6 weeks. I enjoy the scenes with a story and some dialogue. While the writing isn't going to blow you away, it's more than adequate and the quality of models helps. It feels like they have hit on a sweet spot where they have found models who do not look like they're failing at acting, but are just kind of airheaded and it makes the scenes more believable.
This is one of the biggest standalone/premium sites Team Skeet has with 209 scenes and 6-7 updates per month. The scenes don't offer a big story shift from scene to scene. It's usually either the brother catching his stepsister masturbating and he joins her or she catches him masturbating and joins him until they're having sex.
The video quality is very good. Their streaming player is one of the better ones I've used. I experience minimal buffering. The files are very large since the scenes are so long. A few I have downloaded were over 5 Gigabytes for the 1080p versions.
The picture sets are studio type pictures not screencaps, but they also offer the screencaps too. The trailers can be useful if you prefer certain positions. They have a tagging system that I think has too many tags to be very useful.
Some of the scenes to give you an idea of what the content is like are Stepsister Snatch Stash, which is one of the hottest scenes on the site featuring Indica Flower, Sneaking Around With Sis and An Unexpected Mouthful of Cum. The scenes all have the "oops, look what I walked up on" moment. I find the content to be entertaining throughout the site.
Epoch is the biller and they have a Paypal option, but as others have mentioned some of these Paypal options only allow a Mastercard, this is one of those.
I think they should stick to making porn like these scenes and their other standalone sites. At some point, hot and sexy, even gets stale. A little humor and even silliness makes this content fun to watch, then it gets hot and sexy.
An excellent site and the amount of content, though not large, is worth the price. About 60% of the content I've downloaded over the last 4 months has been from these Team Skeet standalone/premium sites. |
|
11-12-19 12:16am
Replies (1)
|
Review
218
|
Evil Angel
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this site and have to say I feel completely overwhelmed.
I like a lot of hardcore porn -- I also like some transsexual and like most women, the male/male/female bisexual scenes too. They have all of them!
My account, joined on Halloween special, says 14,760 scenes, they have 60 male/male/female bisexual and 2,096 transsexual scenes. This will take me years to go through!
The site works well enough to be able to find those numbers above just by sliding a simple slider, but there's a lot of options on here I don't understand. I don't know who any of these directors are. |
| Cons: |
There's not enough time or patience in me to go through all this content. I need more filters.
It could be more clear. I click on movies and it brings up entire DVDs and I don't know if they are the newest ones or oldest ones. There's so much content it's like they can't contain it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've heard about this site for years. It lives up to what I've heard. I've already seen a couple scenes I wish hadn't seen. I've seen a few that made me wonder if a straight female that finds a transsexual woman attractive is still straight? I really believe the male/male/female bisexual niche is vastly underrated. They don't have a lot here, but I don't have any of these so I will definitely be adding those to my collection of bisexual scenes.
Some of these scenes have 4K. One of my current favorite stars is Karma Rx and she has an entire DVD on here that has her First Interracial DP, First Double Anal and first scene ever with a transsexual. Those alone are worth the price of the site as cheap as it is on holidays.
The biggest complaint I have is I know I'm not going to find 1/4 of what I'm looking for. It feels like they could have more filters. I know that they are at least related to Adult Time and that's what the navigation here reminds me of. It's not terribly, but you do feel like they could add some more options to it.
They have over 4,000 female models and nearly 1,000 transsexual models. I didn't realize there's a studio besides transsexual studios that shot this much transsexual porn.
Most of the videos have up to 1080p and some do have 4K, but I see no way to filter that to give an exact number. That part is frustrating enough to take 5 points off.
The content is mostly very hardcore, there's a lot of anal, a lot of dual penetration of multiple holes, including double penetration in one hole. They have small picture galleries with the scenes that you can download, most of the photos look like pre-scene photos.
I'm rating it very high because I haven't seen a site that appeals to this big of a crowd except for maybe Kink's network. They have every niche you could ask for, but they don't have a category search to let you separate them easily. Some of these transsexual scenes are very different. You will see a transsexual up a man's butt while the man, supposed to be straight is sucking the dick of another transsexual. It's absolute mayhem!
I will probably wait for the next round of holiday sales and maybe get a year to this one as I don't feel my month membership is going to help me find what all I'm looking for. |
|
11-05-19 12:58am
Replies (1)
|
Review
219
|
Oye Loca
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the sexiest sites I have seen. Especially for amateurs.
It has 256 scenes and despite not set update schedule they seem to average a couple scenes per month.
The scenes come with a video, photos and screencaps, all are downloadable.
One of the few times that I felt the models are more important to the scenes than the sex. There's just something really sexy and seductive about this content.
Content is exclusive. |
| Cons: |
It needs more updates.
This is a different con, I would like to see the scenes stay in the foreplay area longer. The kissing, touching, oral sex in these scenes is the some of the best I've seen, but they don't stay in that area long enough. |
| Bottom Line: |
I hadn't looked much at this site, but decided to a few weeks ago and I felt like I have missed out on something. The sexuality and sensuality in these scenes is very high.
Some of these women shouldn't even have sex. They should just move around, stripping, making eye contact, moving their tongues across their lips and I think the guys would be finished before the sex started. I could be wrong about these being amateurs as they don't act like amateurs. These models could teach most pro porn models a thing or two about being seductive.
My biggest two complaints are that the women get naked too fast and there's not enough foreplay. These women in clothes and stripping and worth paying to see. The foreplay, especially the kissing, these models seem so passionate and even filled with lust.
The sex is kind of a letdown compared to the build-up to it.
There are 256 scenes and it doesn't look like they ever had an established schedule of release. I guess they film in South America and must just upload content as they film it?
I can see why this site has been scored high on a consistent basis. It's an easy to use site, the scenes come with videos, photos and screencaps, there's not much story to the scenes, but that's the whole point of my review. If you like foreplay and sexiness in clothes, this site is really worth checking out just for those parts.
I keep telling myself and saying in reviews, "I'm not a lesbian", but the bodies on these women are about as perfect as I have seen.
I do wish they had more outdoor scenes, maybe around pools with the women in bikini cover-ups. I was going to let my membership lapse this month, but I might either stay for one more or month or try to download the majority of the scenes from this site. I think they need to push this site a little more or maybe add some step-sibling scenes to it to keep up with the times. Very good site that's worth a membership all by itself. |
|
11-05-19 12:28am
Replies (1)
|
Review
220
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Public exhibitionism porn with a little disgracing.
470 scenes that include downloadable videos and photos.
Broad array of models are featured here, shapes, sizes, colors.
The outdoor scenes are my favorite and are the best examples of public exhibitionism I have seen.
The scenes are full of different fetishes. Anal, DP, multiple cumshots, hose, legs, oral, vaginal, sex toys, it's the closest I have seen to a site that brings up the old saying of "everything but the kitchen sink". |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating in January of 2019, the site had a banner on it that said there was going to be new content over the summer, but it never transpired.
The newer scenes feel more contrived. There's less feeling of spontaneity. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the type of site I could really get into. The majority of scenes start with a naked woman being walked around in public or displayed indoors for people to look at. The disgrace part is usually not that disgraceful.
The scenes all have a familiar start, but after the start there really is no way to know where the scene is going. I think that's a very important part of a niche site like this. You know the woman is going to have sex, probably anal sex, probably oral sex and get cummed on, but you don't know how many guys are going to be involved, if another woman is going to show up and maybe give her oral or use a Magic Wand on her or where they will end up as far as the location.
I didn't list it as a pro or con, but one part I think falls between those is the length of the scenes. Some of these scenes are over an hour long and they can be tiresome to the viewer. Just when you think they've settled into a position, they change positions, change rooms or locations and everything starts over again. I'm not for sure how to grade that part. It's good in some scenes and very distracting in other scenes.
I do know that most of the scenes are very hot even if you want to grab them and tell them to stop moving around so much. The women on this site seem to be well-prepared for the multiple penetrations and that takes away the disgrace part for me. You will see a few acts of what I would call violence, like slaps and spitting, but usually the woman is as aggressive as the men.
I don't think no new updates hurts it unless you already have all the scenes. At 470 scenes, most averaging nearly an hour, it's not likely that you're going to run out of this content if you're really into it.
The public part could be questioned as a lot of the scenes are indoors with an audience. This is like the previous might be a pro, might be a con, I think some of the hottest scenes on it are the indoor ones. Maybe it just makes the performers more comfortable.
The production quality is good, but I do think they could use more direction or more cameras. Sometimes the action is focused on where there's not much action.
It's still a very good site on an excellent network and worth checking out if you're into exhibitionism. |
|
11-04-19 09:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
221
|
BFFs
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A standalone site by the Team Skeet group.
Scenes are interesting, silly, funny, high production quality and most are very long (45 minutes or more).
137 scenes with videos and photos to download.
Some of the "cuter" lesbian scenes I've seen.
Updates twice per month.
Not all scenes are just females, some have multiple guys in them as well. |
| Cons: |
Like other Team Skeet sites there's a block of ads right in the middle of the scene listing.
I can't find a model list just for BFFs, the model list at the top of the page shows me all the models on all the Team Skeet sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site looked fun and I have generally liked the Team Skeet sites, especially the standalone ones. It was exactly what I expected and hoped for.
One scene is a group of 3 dorm friends peeking in the door and recording their friend having sex with a guy. There are a couple of exercise/fitness scenes that are better than all the content I saw on Fitness Rooms. It's very professional feeling and I think with content like this, it has to be. You're really not going to get a roomful of amateur girls to just start ad-lib from yoga into an orgy.
I read some of the previous reviews and thought I would update some of the cons others have listed. The download options on videos are 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and 360p. The 1080p files are very large due to the length of the scenes, one I downloaded was 4.5GB for a 1080p 53 minute scene.
They have those options on all 137 scenes.
They do list the models names and you can click them to see if they have any other scenes. Some are very vague like Ecstasy and one of the guys is John Doe.
They have trailers, screencaps, pictures and videos of each scene.
I think the strongest point of the content is that there is a story even if it's silly. I also joined their standalone site Family Strokes and thought it had a very similar feel to this site.
I have read that Team Skeet is going to start including these standalone sites with Team Skeet for a special price. Even having paid the add-on price of $10, I feel I got my money's worth. I downloaded 45 scenes and feel like they will be ones I will keep and watch multiple times.
There's nothing at all serious about any of these scenes. They even have one with 3 girls playing video games, with the "loser" having to have sex with one of the girl's geeky brother. I like porn like that. Just give my imagination something to work with.
The only real negatives are the ones you'll find on all Team Skeet sites. Every few rows of scenes there are two rows of ads. I don't find them that bad just because I would like to try more of their standalone sites and those ads give me an idea of which ones I might like.
For me, it's a very above average site for those that like cute girls being playful with each other. |
|
10-22-19 01:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
222
|
Open Life
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Archive network that has a lot of good content on it.
You receive 10 sites not including the hub site, 9 of them solo models and one is a pair of sisters (Lane).
It's easy to use, once in the hub or any of the sites there is a dropdown box to switch directly to one of the other sites.
The site with the sisters (I don't know if they really are), does a good job of making you believe they are if they are not and that's a major taboo.
While the network hasn't updated in several years, most of the videos I have downloaded have 720p and 1080p options. The photos have zip files. |
| Cons: |
I think the biggest con is if you like the models. These are 10 very narrow sites that offer a lot of content of 10 models (1 male).
It's not updating, but I am offsetting that with content being new to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like anything that has a taboo feel to it. The Lane Sisters have 135 videos on here, some of them are them giving one guy a blowjob at the same time. They have threesomes, threesomes and foursomes with other women too. They look more like sisters than Britney and Whitney Stevens. That content was enough for me. The oldest scene on it has 720p and 1080p options on the videos.
The other sites you receive access to are Ashley Fires, Abbey Brooks, Bree Olsen, Devon Lee, Dylan Ryder, Hannah Hilton, Manuel Ferrara, Sunny Leone and Cassandra Calogera.
I downloaded some of the Ashley Fires content. They have 89 videos of her and some of her content is very good. I was more familiar with her work that must have been earlier in her career. Some of the content here shows her going into femdom. It's always interesting to me see a softcore model become a dom.
The Sunny Leone site has 337 scenes with her in them. Being of Indian descent, I have always found her scenes intriguing, most are softcore.
The Open Life hub site has over 240 other models, most of these are just very straightforward sex, but it is a lot of content and everything I have watched has 720p and 1080p. The content even looks exclusive, but I don't know that for sure.
I still think your happiness with it will be based on if you like any of the featured models, all with 80 or more scenes each. The rest of the scenes feel like ones you could get on any DVD.
The featured models have much better photo sets as well. There's an excellent one of Bree Olsen stripping in a club in Germany. It looks like this network, at one time, had a lot of potential, but I am guessing most of these featured models are now retired or just aren't shooting much content.
The join process was simple, but I will say this is part of Gamma Entertainment, the same company that owns Adult Time and all the sites within it. I have joined 4 of their sites in the past and had to go through 4 attempted usernames before finding one that said it wasn't taken. They were all mine. Very few if any people have the same name as I have. The cancellation is though Fame Support and is easy. I was happy with it just from the Lane Sisters content, but the Ashley Fires dom scenes and the Sunny Leone ones made it an excellent deal. |
|
10-22-19 01:11am
Replies (1)
|
Review
223
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Major points for artistic quality and production values of these very tattooed models having sex.
1504 scenes, newer scenes have 4K and 8 other video options from 160p to 1080p.
One update per week though they did miss a week recently.
The sex has two speeds, rough and rougher.
Interesting Halloween-themed scenes including a grown-up Wednesday Addams look-alike.
Looks like they spend a fortune on some of their scenes and that someone sat with a notebook writing every step of the scene out. |
| Cons: |
Unique gets boring too. Though they have a story with most scenes they barely touch on it before it becomes just another porn scene except with tattooed performers.
Some of the guys are just hideous to look at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I come from a culture that is very accepting of tattoos. In our history, they were often revered as a show of royalty. As an expat in America, I still have the intrigue towards the tattoos, but haven't got one myself.
Maybe it's just me thinking too much, but do people with tattoos always have rough sex? Does it come with the territory? I like rough sex porn. It's just it seems like every scene here is recorded in double speed.
Some of the models are really pretty. Some of them look like their tattoos make them prettier. A lot of the guys on here look like a full body tattoo would be an improvement.
They have 1,504 scenes, streaming player works great, I only download the scenes with models I like (Karma RX, Lily Lane, Gina Valentina) are a few of those. I do think Gina's inclusion is funny. She's nothing like most of these models when it comes to number of tattoos or piercings, but she's a very pretty woman.
If you're into anal they have 330 scenes with anal. It honestly seems like more than that after watching multiple scenes all with anal.
I think the best scenes on here are the solo scenes. There are only 132, but you do get very rough masturbation from those 132 scenes. It fills in a niche that isn't very popular. Most solo scenes stay firmly in the softcore genre. Joanna Angel, one of the most prolific models on the site has an outstanding balcony masturbation scene. I really think they should focus on releasing more of these solo scenes. The last one was nearly 18 months ago.
That is my one major complaint. The scenes over the last year are interchangeable. They're still creative, they're still different than normal porn, but only until you get over the shock of the body art.
It's a polarizing site to me. There are people who will hate it for all the tattoos and implants and there are people who will love it just for those reasons. I know a site like this promotes an alternative lifestyle and that's where I think they miss. An alternative lifestyle would have solo, lesbian, orgies, swingers, but instead, the majority of scenes are just male/female.
It's recommended for those that like tattoos and if you are into solo scenes the ones here are very good. |
|
10-15-19 12:54am
Replies (2)
|
Review
224
|
We Live Together
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very beautiful lesbian scenes.
800 scenes including a video, photos and screenshots
Videos stream well and can be downloaded (with upgrade $15/mo)
Mostly American models, tattoos, implants and piercings are common. I like tattoos and piercings, don't really care about implants.
Tag system is good, but it can by iffy on accuracy. |
| Cons: |
Hit or miss scenes. It seems like for every good scene there's a bad scene.
Too many ads, when you sign in you are met with a full page ad, every page has multiple small ads on them.
Probably 200 too many scenes. There's obviously a limit on how much you can do with "we live together" and it shows as many scenes feel like you've seen them before -- and you have.
No longer updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
We Live Together has a good reputation as one of the best American lesbian sites and I do think they earn it. It reminds me of when a band that keeps releasing a new album every year hoping to find their magic, but they don't realize they're out of ideas.
There are 800 scenes, that's a lot for a lesbian site and at least 200 of them are excellent, I would estimate 400 of them are okay and would be dependent on if you like the models in the scene. The other 200 feel like retreads.
The story of the scenes is simple. It's two or three, sometimes more than three, young, college age looking models that live together and decide since they share an apartment or home they are going to share themselves with each other.
For my taste in lesbian porn there's too much pussy licking and not enough kissing, touching, fingering. It is sold as the women reacting on a whim to finally try sex with another woman. It's not really that believable that they would jump right in nose up to clit.
The scenes are streaming only unless you pay the $15 upgrade fee. With an upgrade you can download up to 1080p. The tagging system could use some work. One of the tags on the We Live Together site is "cumshot". Another is "blowjob".
The oldest scenes had more of an amateur feel to them and are generally better. They have a couple of women in the earlier years that were regulars. I would think that would have been the direction they would have liked this site to have. You could have shown how the progression to trying lesbian sex turned into more then you could have had something like one of the women cheating on her girlfriend with a guy.
My feeling towards it might not sound as positive as it is. I just felt like the scenes were becoming stale and dull. It's a very good lesbian site. Is it possible for a porn site to pigeonhole itself too much? That's the feeling here.
The models aren't the problem. Even in the newer scenes they have some really pretty models. I think it's well above average, but it's not quite into the elite area. |
|
10-15-19 12:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
225
|
Fetish Network
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch. |
| Cons: |
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for. |
|
10-07-19 11:10pm
Replies (1)
|
|
