Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Alybator (0)  

Feedback:   All (248)  |   Reviews (225)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (22)

Other:   Replies Received (68)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 237 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Kink.com

Kink.com
(0)

99.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The first non-mainstream sites I joined were Kink sites and they all come in one big package now.

They are showing 87 channels by my count and seem to be adding new ones every month, some seem to just be previews for mainstream sites (Spizoo, DDF).

Kink is highly consistent with their content and as great as some of it, it can be just as frustrating, that's the consistency. You won't see many "just okay" scenes. You will see a lot of great/wow scenes and a lot of that's just terrible scenes.

Over 13,500 scenes and they average 1 new scene per day. If you're a photo collector they have photos on some, others don't.

4,480 models, for me, it always surprises me to see a mainstream or glam type model on here, but there are a lot of them. Some seem to really enjoy working for Kink others look like they realized it's not for them.

I think overall they have the best production values, planning, screening, choices of models for each type of scene of any site or network.
Cons: It's a lot of porn to look through. I have had a year membership for 2 of the last 3 years and I am pretty sure there's content I still haven't seen.

The loss of passion or energy on some of the sites. I guess it's best that they stop updating those sites and just let them die off, but they've had a lot of good ideas they didn't seem to give time to develop.
Bottom Line: The only thing stopping me from rating this network a 100 is I don't like how they're adding content from other sites. I really like the DDF Network, but I don't see how their content, even if just a sampling, belongs on Kink and the same with Spizoo. It's like in some cases the best addition is subtraction.

Before the Kink Network was formed, I had been a member of these Kink sites as standalone sites: Hogtied, Device Bondage, Water Bondage, Sex and Submission multiple times, Public Disgrace, Divine Bitches multiple times, Wired Pussy, Electrosluts and Fucking Machines. I would have rated each of those between 88-95. Math was my worst subject, but I'm just that justifies the 99 score for the whole network.

Also a part of my high score is based on the value. I have joined a year membership twice at $79.95, that's a lot of sites and a lot of different, unique content to keep you occupied for a very cheap price. It makes me think of those commercials that say "for less than a daily cup of coffee" you can have 365 days of whipping, spanking, mechanized sex machines, women wrestling, and just a lot of sex.

It's an impossible task to cover this entire network in a review of 5,000 characters, but I do think the overall point can be made.

I never owned an external hard drive until I joined the Kink Network. I just used my computer's hard drive. There is still a feeling of a community at Kink. The comments on scenes are usually more interesting than anything on my social media accounts. Sometimes they are damning comments that show the aggressive side the content brings out, it's not uncommon to see comments like, "You let that bitch off easy" and there are other nicer comments like, "Beautiful model, excellent execution and production of the scene."

I think that is the whole selling point of Kink. When they get a scene right they really get it right. There are scenes here that make you believe Isis Love or Dragon Lily really convinced that hardcore, straight man to bend over and take a dildo up his butt just for the chance to get to be with her in the way he wants. They have scenes that are very good, but make you wonder what the point of them were (The Upper Floor, Everything Butt).

Some of the Sex and Submission scenes which I think it probably their most consistently good site, show that bondage, rough sex, can be done in a loving and caring way that ignites the carnal nature of both the male and female.

I found the sites with water torture to be some of the most intriguing and even exciting scenes I have seen from any niche. You see what you don't want to see and that's a near panic from the model and Kink's expertise in timing, understanding how long is safe and care for their models pulls them to safety at what seems like the last second.

I think their one site that goes "too far" is Fucking Machines. I can't imagine what some of those women feel like after what looks to be 5 or more orgasms and the machine is still going at top speed. You are going into the area of the limitations of the human body.

The Electro sites bring both a laugh and shake of the head. I remember using a Magic Wand once that sparked from a blown fuse, so I can only imagine what it's liked to have your clitoris constantly shocked and sparked.

That's where Kink does their best work. They seem to be genuinely concerned and set on protecting their models so they have a wild, exciting, maybe once in a lifetime experience with very little risk for injury. I think that type of content appeals to those that maybe are not just into porn for the sex. You are seeing humans reaching ecstasy and bliss without even reaching orgasm.

Public Disgrace offers what I think is the best exhibitionism experience. And in my review of it, I said and do believe, some of the indoor scenes are the best they have. The ones in locations where we as normal people can imagine us being like a movie store or bar. It's a situation we can relate to unlike any of us really having a bedroom of all white bedding, curtains blowing in the wind like many sites try these these days.

There's a realness to it even if it's extreme and that's the appeal. Maybe the extreme isn't that unrealistic and once your mind starts thinking that the fantasies and dreams start being formed.

If I had one request of them it would be more content like they have on Divine Bitches or even TS Seduction. These are situations/scenarios where we could possibly in our fantasies see them really happening and that causes our minds to decide what we would do in those situations. Most of the time, in our fantasies, we would do what we probably wouldn't in real life. I see porn as an avenue for generating thoughts and fantasies I normally would not have as it's hard to fantasize about something you've never thought about or done.

It is my choice of best network/site and I think my review shows why and shows how genuine I am in this high of a score.

11-18-19  10:29pm

Replies (1)
Review
2
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)

98.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The biggest and best Ladyboy site I have tried out.

An incredible 3,827 scenes and it's updating 3 times per week.

They have over 2,100 models and these all look to be Asian, but I could be wrong on a few.

Over 3,500 of those scenes are solo and that's why I call it the best for me.

The navigation makes it easy to get through this massive site.

I have found their in-house billing to be both responsive and fast in answering questions and canceling memberships.
Cons: The biggest con here is I feel like this site -- at least for me, nearly makes all other Ladyboy sites obsolete.

Second biggest con is most of the models do not have more than 1 scene.
Bottom Line: I am going to start this by saying anyone that likes having their beliefs around men/women challenged go to this site's model search and look up the model GOT. She does have 5 scenes which is a lot on this site and I really can't say I have ever seen a more attractive TS/LB than her. Which is the best part about this site. This site has the prettiest collection of Ladyboy models I have ever seen. I would say better than the last 5 Ladyboy sites I have been a member of combined. I do think there is a question about the attractiveness to a straight female like me. While I am sure I do not have any feelings of being a lesbian, I do like seeing pretty, nude women. I don't even think it's bi-curious. The opportunity has been there before and I didn't take it. I do believe the unveiling of a hard dick when combined with boobs and a pretty face makes me question if that would count as bisexual. I would be interested in how many straight men see these women dressed and need to see the hard dick before turning away their attention. The interest in alternative sex and arousal is high with me, just like I love the Kink network. This site is very close to being my favorite site. I was lucky a few months ago when I found Chaos Men, then last month I took the risk of joining BiEmpire and found my favorite bisexual site. I finally have found my favorite TS/LB site with Ladyboy-Ladyboy.

The numbers put perspective on the whole size of Ladyboy/TS popularity. Besides the 2,000+ models, they have nearly 4,000 scenes. These scenes come with pictures and screenshots, everything can be downloaded and I haven't run into any limits. I do think the price is a little high at $36.95, but I am going to let it expire then see if they have any multi-month deals that reduce the cost. My internet provider is not happy with me!

The scenes are nothing out of the ordinary. The models are. I do believe these models could be good examples for straight men to watch. They do seem to enjoy playing with their dicks more than straight men do, there's more eroticism to it, it doesn't look like they're trying to tear the thing off -- or are angry, or in a race.

The newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. I still haven't invested in a 4K monitor and am at the point, I don't think I will. The 720p and 1080p are very clear to me. The advanced search engine is useful on this site, but not as useful as it would be if the models were less attractive. I'm not for sure any of the details like dick size, hair length, even matter to me with these models. The beauty here is in watching what appears to be an attractive woman playing with her hard dick. The femininity of these models is very high and can be seen when they rub their nipples, slide their hands up and down their sides all before touching their dick and sometimes go back to touching other parts of their body even after starting their masturbation. It's highly erotic to me and that's what I was hoping to find in this niche. I would not only recommend it to TS/LB fans, but even to those with any curiosity towards TS. It is the best and biggest Ladyboy site I have been on.

09-09-20  02:17am

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit Chaos Men

Chaos Men
(0)

98.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: What I saw as an obscure gay site is now my favorite gay site.

2,395 exclusive videos of I think amateur men.

They have zipped photos, zipped cam caps (screencaps) and animated gifs you can download. Not all scenes have all 3, but those animated gifs in a zip file (usually more than 5) is the first time I have seen that offered and those are good to save on your phone for “lunch breaks” at work.

CCbill is the biller which I have found is rarely the case for gay sites.

Large collection of solo scenes, the men are mostly masculine, and each scene includes pertinent model facts like dick size, cut/uncut.

High quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded.

Was cheaper than I expected, the price I was given was $12.48 for the first month and $19.95 if you let it recur.
Cons: Some of the videos look like they are self-shot or shot by someone using a phone camera. The quality is fine, but some are filmed vertically so if you watch on a computer monitor or television the video, even at 1080p, only takes up the middle of your screen.

Exclusive and amateur is just based on my limited knowledge of gay porn.
Bottom Line: I know it might be unexpected for a straight woman to join gay sites, but I have three reasons. Straight sites rarely have a guy masturbating or being masturbated unless handjob or CFNM and two, gay porn does seem to be the only possible way to see solo men.

The third reason and I would call it the biggest reason is being from India most of the men in India spend their entire lives denying masturbation and saying they have never done it. Which also means they will not do it in front of even their girlfriend or wife. These same men will spend their entire lives looking up porn of Desi women that strip or do sexual dances in their traditional clothes. These same men will then say they “just watch” the videos!

I have been in the United States for over 10 years now, speak English fairly clear and have developed fetishes Indian men wouldn’t do, but American men will do.

Chaos Men has solo scenes that are exactly what I look for. I can find transsexual videos that have good solo videos, but what I look for requires another step of at least masculine men being the ones masturbating. My image of a masculine man might not be like others. Hairy chest is good, a beard is very good and his body frame doesn’t really matter unless he’s slimmer than I am. Most of the gay sites I have joined feature a lot of “twinks”. These are slimmer men that look very young. There is not a lot of fantasy there for me. I probably could dominate them. The men on Chaos Men are not all “bears” either, but most are medium to bigger built in frame and it lets me have my fantasy like and older man looking at a pretty 19 year old woman.

It's not perfect. It does not have categories. You have to search for what you are looking for and hope the search box brings it up. This site has 794 solo scenes. The men are mostly that moderate to bigger build, many have beards or at least some facial hair, some are bald, there are tattoos, which I do not see as adding masculinity. Many even have hairy armpits which you rarely see on the twink gay sites. There’s chest hair, some even have back hair, which is not a turn-off for me. I think the difference in cultures shows there. The hairier a man is the more masculine I see him.

And there are 794 of these scenes! I have been happy with sites that had 20 masculine men masturbating.

A complaint that I think some would have is some of these scenes are 15 years old. Those only have a 240p option on downloads.

I was a little worried it was going to be one of those gay sites where they started out with solo guys then stopped filming solo once they upgraded their cameras, but it’s almost the exact opposite. I was so interested in looking at all these guys that I went through their pages finding when they switched to better cameras. I hope that shows my enthusiasm.

The first 20 solo videos only had 240p videos. The next 60 moved up to 360p. Starting there, they added 720p and 1080p. Which means they have over 700 videos of solo men with both 720p and 1080p download options while only having around 80 in the poorer quality. On the newer videos they also offer two versions of 720p, these add the 60 frames per second version, while the other versions are 30 frames per second. The 1080p in the newer versions is only available in 60 frames per second. I am fine with the 30 frames per second since this site is going to do a good job of trying to make me buy another external hard drive as it is! The size difference between the 720p with 30 frames per second is 414MB, the 720p with 60 frames per second is 1.01GB or more than double the size.

The animated gifs is a feature I have never seen on any site. These are not like the ones you can find on Google, these are up to 5 seconds long and there are 8-12 included in a zip so you can watch them in a row and get the best parts without sound and without needing much space on your phone. The pictures are very good quality and show the guy going from clothed and limp to nude and hard. Those can be downloaded in a zip too.

I have joined gay networks, gay standalone sites, looking for something like this, but cannot say any of those sites made me feel like I could with confidence recommend them to straight women, but I can this one. Straight women and most gay men have similar interests when it comes to men. I never thought I would say I felt lucky finding a porn site, but I do. It is as if this is exactly what I have been looking for and finally found it. Having CCBill as the biller is also great. I joined a few other gay sites that had billers I had never heard of. I'm planning on letting it recur at least for a month since it was only $12.48 for the first month. There also is plenty of the male/male and group scenes for gay men to enjoy too. This is easily my favorite of the gay sites I have joined. The quality continues with the filenames including the model’s name. Had to edit 5 times to get below 5,000 characters.

06-17-20  05:54am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Frank's TGirl World

Frank's TGirl World
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Transsexual site, owned or managed by Grooby that is perfect for all genders including straight women.

The models vary a lot, but I mostly see Asians on the site. Asians are my preference in transsexuals.

Four to five updates per week, each includes video and photos.

A lot of very pretty transsexuals or T-Girls if you insist.

I was able to join through Epoch using Paypal.

Would the pun be too much to say loads of solo scenes?
Cons: They have some sex scenes with men. I keep waiting on the transsexual site that stays away from hardcore sex.

I don’t know how they would do it, but I would like to see the scenes be a little longer. Nearly all are under 20 minutes, and some are under 15 minutes. There was only one transsexual model I ever watched that was really good at showing her body. Some of these transsexuals could.
Bottom Line: There are a lot of different classifications for transsexuals. We have the transsexual, the she-male, the T-Girl, the Ladyboys and that’s why straight males have problems getting into this type of porn. They know that at least one of those classifications is more feminine. I don’t even know which one. I usually prefer Ladyboys. I do like a lot of T-Girls and even transsexuals. The She-Males in my experience are the more masculine types. You’re not going to see many masculine models on Frank’s T-Girl World. These are mostly very feminine, pretty t-girls, transsexuals and I have to think a lot of these models are going into transgender where they were born with feminine genetics, but called a male.

There is not a lot of story or plot to these scenes. The variety of models is impressive. The site irself say that Frank has been filming and photographing t-girls since 2002. From the United States to Brazil to the Philippines. You can tell, as with Grooby sites, that the producer and one in charge really enjoys filming transsexuals. That’s a big deal in this genre. I think it will become an even more important part of transsexual porn. It is becoming more mainstream. Some of the biggest networks in the world are now featuring transsexual scenes. Which means a change of pace for their producers that are used to filming the more “mainstream” porn genres. That’s a major advantage for this site.

I don’t know how much model and producer chemistry really matters, but I do believe if there was a problem between model and producer the scene wouldn’t be as good. These very feminine models do look like and act like they expect to be treated like ladies. Wallets are a lot easier to open than minds. Frank at Frank’s T-Girl World is very open to the transsexuals and t-girls. You get really good pictures and genuine smiles from the models. Some transsexual solo scenes are very flat to watch. The only excitement or tension you see in those is the model trying her best to cum and get the scene over with. Frank’s scenes have some teasing and it’s like the models are teasing Frank. I didn’t know the importance of model and producer chemistry until a few members here pointed me in the direction of ALS Scan and a few other sites that excel at on-screen chemistry between the model and producer. I do see that at Frank’s T-Girl World.

Adding that in with nearly 2,000 models, over 3,500 videos and over 700,000 photos, there’s a really good chance you will find some content you like. Even if the T-girl is taboo to you. I do believe sites like this one are the most important part of growing the transsexual genre. They tried to jump transsexual porn to mainstream and put it in the hands of producers that have not ever filmed transsexuals. A site like this one needs more attention despite the high price. It’s around $38 per month.

You shouldn’t have any concerns either. The support at Frank’s T-Girl World is run by Grooby and you can join using Epoch through Paypal. That is a potential problem with other transsexual sites that use billers no one has heard of. I go against all thinking when I say this next part. I like that a lot of these models are average or below endowment. It adds something to the attraction to the model. She’s not able to rely on the snake between her legs. There are still models with large endowment, but it’s not a requirement. The majority of the scenes are solo and that’s what I prefer with transsexuals. I never thought someone masturbating their dick could be sexy and seductive. Some of these transsexuals are sexy and seductive. In comparison, the transsexuals on Brazilian Transsexuals are more extravagant and in your face sexy. The T-Girls are more seductive about it. Even mysterious. One of the newest updates shows the chemistry. It’s of a model named Tan. She had a scene back in 2016, 6 years ago and you have to think she had a good experience, or she wouldn’t be filming with them again. My current favorite site of 2022.

04-11-22  07:23pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Possibly my favorite current network. Excellent job of different niches and genres.

Very impressive quality and quantity: 19,946 scenes and everything after 2011 has at least HD 720 and 1080, with the newer scenes having 4K. Updates are 1-2 times per day.

Seems like they accidentally stumbled into being one of the best transsexual sites, even with all the straight scenes too.

Some of the producer sites that don’t have listings here really stand out to me like the Dana Vespoli produced scenes.

The navigation is very good. You can go from site to site and it has so many filters (models, categories) that you can click as not wanting to see or wanting to see.

There’s not hardly any of their sites that should be overlooked. Everything on this network is at least worth looking into.
Cons: You have to look for cons on this network. Maybe you could say there’s overuse of certain models, especially the males.

They could have better pictures, even professional quality, photo sets would add to it.
Bottom Line: Evil Angel’s original draw for me was the transsexual content. They have TS Playground, Transsexual Angels and TS Factor which is one that is easy to overlook. They have the new, but I think underwhelming, PansexualX. Those transsexual sites have a total of 2,491 scenes and of those 2,491, 1,086 are solo which I really like and 248 are transsexual with a woman. I don’t know if there is another site that has that much of those two niches in the transsexual genre on one site. I know the network has long been known for their hardcore content, but they have as impressive of a transsexual collection as most transsexual networks. They also have 65 bisexual male scenes. I was just on a bisexual male site that only had 43 scenes.
I mentioned the Dana Vespoli directed scenes. There are 209 of those, it’s advertised as “Smart sexy features, intimate female orientated sex”. It’s really some of the most hardcore sex I have seen. That is important. If it was degrading or disgusting, I wouldn’t watch it. I think these scenes are right at my limit for what is almost too hardcore. I do like that.

I don’t think they would mind that I say I like this network better than Adult Time. Both are owned by the same company. This one has less of the same type of porn. Every update is likely going to be different than the previous one. It’s one of the only sites or networks that I check the updates each day. They have a 1-2 new updates per day schedule. The video quality is very high.

I haven’t ever been that focused on navigation in my reviews. This network is that good at navigation. It has to be talked about. It looks overwhelming at first. Everything I have checked, works on the navigation. There is the one problem you should be aware of. It has the sliders that you can set for bisexual only, lesbian only, transsexual only. I have opened different channels/sites on the network to see nothing. It’s because I had the filters set to just show bisexual. If you are into the different genres that is an invaluable tool. The categories are good. It is very close to being a perfect site.

Besides the nearly 20,000 scenes, they have 6,045 models. I like that there is an ethnic blend in the models. Their latest models show the depth of models they have. One is Eden Ivy, who is a pretty, college to mid-20s looking white model. The second newest Anuskatzz, who is nearly completely covered with tattoos, the polar opposite of Eden Ivy. The third latest or newest is Isabella Fontana, who is a Latin, very pretty transsexual. If you go just a little further there is Alicia Reign, who is a either a Latina or biracial maybe. The model variance is like the scene variance. You get something different with the site. I do plan on keeping my year membership. I replaced my year Kink membership with a year to Evil Angel. It is the only year membership I currently have.

There are what I call, “Neanderthalic” scenes, especially in the older scenes. That kept me from joining long-term in the past. I don’t even mean the word disrespectfully. It’s a non-emotional, non-feeling, cold version of porn that reminds me of what the cavemen did. While most sites have decreased in quality it seems like this network just keeps getting better.

01-12-22  08:46am

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: An enormous amateur site that has been online for 19 years.

Very intimate shoots with professional camerawork. Photo sets and videos are of very good quality.

These are the girls next door in porn. You will see all types of models here including hairy, very cute, average looking, small builds, bigger builds and everything in-between.

Has a tiered membership option that allows to pick what parts you join. They have solo girls, girl/girl and video masturbation. I'm not for sure those are worth doing as the cheapest by itself is $28, you can get all 3 for $39, which is what I did.

They have updated everyday of my membership (since September) and some days have two updates.

Features that you don't regularly see on porn sites like discussion board and newsletters.

The navigation says there are over 7,000 scenes and photo sets. These can be searched by girl-girl hardcore, boyfriend/girlfriend, girl groups, masturbating together and masturbating alone. It's exhaustive.
Cons: The main con is probably the price. It's $39 for everything, but this is my second month, so it hasn't bothered me too much.

The differences from model to model can be hard to get used to when you're used to seeing every model at least look somewhat like the previous one.
Bottom Line: This is my first time joining Abby Winters. It is a very large site with some of the best amateur content I have seen.

It's not the most user-friendly site, but I think it is better than I think it is. They have 1,792 models. You can filter them by age 18-35 or year released 2000 - 2019, also by solo, girl-girl, girl-boy and video masturbation. You can do an advanced search that has height, fetish tags (over 100) and sub-groups like "nude in public". I have never seen a site with this many options.

They have fetishes listed here I've never seen listed on other sites like "up shorts", "nude flexible yoga", "girls in tight shorts". The depth of these search features make the site overwhelming, but that's how you keep members around.

The solo scenes can vary from a 1 to a 10 from one scene to the next depending on what you like. When I watch solo women I liked to feel their confidence. You feel that in many of these. Other scenes you can tell it's the first time the woman has ever masturbated on camera.

The photo sets are also some of the most in-depth I have seen. There is some tease, some teasing into nudity, to explicit nudity and close-ups, all in one set. I don't know if all of their models are from Australia, but you do get a variety of models.

It could be a con to some. There are some very hairy models. There are some with almost no body hair.

You can download the photos in a regular size (whatever the standard camera resolution was at the time) and there are photos in high resolution to download if you prefer those.

The videos have a different style from one to the next. I have watched around 30 where the model seems new to sex toys. There is a woman talking to her and explaining how to use it. These are very erotic to me. There's a feeling of the model really is this new to this and is feeling this type of masturbation for the first time. Some randomly slip moans out, some seem to become tense and nervous and others show their enjoyment of it by speeding up and grinding their hips while using the new toy.

The girl-girl scenes are mostly fun and sexy. I would think this is how it looks the first few times a young woman tries with another young woman. You get everything from kissing, oral, 69, rimming and anal fingering in these scenes and because of the nature of the content, you don't really know what to expect on each scene.

Some of the women that look the shyest seem to be the least shy after viewing their scenes and the women you think are going to be confident and maybe even dominant, become timid. That is a very real factor you don't see in most porn.

The boy-girl scenes are not as good as the girl-girl or solo. These do seem to be real couples and you can tell they are more comfortable together even with a camera recording them. I noticed that there is no option to just join for the boy-girl scenes and I would assume that is why. They don't have the suspense the other scenes have. My personal favorite scenes are the mutual masturbation between two women.

These might be the most realistic porn scenes I have seen. It's a lot like watching amateur user-submitted type videos. You can see the curious women watching each other masturbate. At times, noticing when one speeds up, the other speeds up. There are ones where one will possibly instinctively grabs the thigh of the other. There is a level of interaction between the models in these scenes that surpasses the need for perfect looks or perfect bodies.

This is another site I would like to see a cheaper long-term membership offered for. The year membership is $329. It is probably worth that, but it's steeper than I want to pay at one time. I think the best option for me might be to let my membership run out then join for 3 months at $88. That would be a $35 discount over letting it recur 3 months in a row. I feel like I'm going to spend months going through all this content.

The women masturbating together is a niche I rarely see and it's one that as a non-lesbian, I can really enjoy and even understand.

There's a few more parts to mention. You can select your favorites and it works. Each scene has a little heart on it. You click it and it is stored for you to return to. This is very useful for browsing through multiple pages at a time without stopping to download. I currently have over 100 videos in my favorites. You can also add models to your favorites and each model has color coded dots on their profile that tells what all kinds of content they have like solo, girl-girl, boy-girl.

The video quality is excellent. They have 1080p scenes with 10k bitrates. They have 1240x576 versions, then two lesser versions. The older quality does drop, but they are still watchable.

I can't recommend it enough. This does not look like porn. It looks like people enjoying sex. I think I am scoring it LOW by giving it a 97 and that's just because I still am having trouble with the navigation and getting used to it.

10-01-19  12:42am

Replies (1)
Review
7
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: The dirtier (possibly), more passionate (maybe), younger (females) side of Porn Fidelity.

There are around 500 scenes on just Teen Fidelity. They have an average of 4 updates per month.

Video downloads up to 5K.

Navigation is really good on the Fidelity sites, they have filters, tags and all of it works. You don’t have to specify the site you want to search from. The color of the scene name tells you which site is from. It’s simplified for you.

They show the fetishes some of the models have in the scenes. The newest update is the best example of that I will talk about it below.

The package of Teen Fidelity, Porn Fidelity and Kelly Madison is a great yearly join.
Cons: Not as many threesomes as there used to be. I don’t care why. It was common before and those were my favorites.

I have heard cancelling can sometimes be a problem, but I haven’t ever cancelled it. I join per year. I don’t know why it would be difficult to cancel since they’re known for outstanding customer service.
Bottom Line: This site was the reason I found out about Porn Fidelity. I liked the scenes where Ryan and Kelly would pick up a teen to have a threesome with them. Times have changed and that doesn’t happen much anymore. It’s still my preferred site out of the Fidelity sites. I think the guys get into the scenes more. I don’t like saying that since it’s saying the younger women get the guys more excited. I’m closer to “older” than “younger”.

The newest scene that I mentioned in the pros shows a young model named Lilly Bella who has a ball fetish. I know women with that fetish. I like seeing the focus on what the models like. Instead of what the producer says. That is how Teen Fidelity has always been to me. There is an enjoyment going on in the scene that goes beyond getting paid.

I do believe they’re being a little loose about which models appear on Teen Fidelity and which are on Porn Fidelity. I can’t really say much since they give you both sites with one membership. I just believe the Teen Fidelity scenes have more passion and lust in them. It gives me the sense that the female and male are ready to rip each other’s clothes off. I haven’t seen that on many sites. I don’t know exactly how these scenes are setup or how the models are picked. I just know I like it.

Similar to Porn Fidelity, behind the scenes photos are available along with standard photos and you can download those. The behind the scenes photos are really good from Teen Fidelity. I really wasn’t into photos until I started looking at Teen Fidelity’s behind the scenes photos several years ago. Their videos are high quality with up to 5K downloads. You do have the download limit of 15 scenes per week. I believe if you joined the site for full price, per month, that download limit would be a problem, but if you join the yearly promo, you don’t really pay attention to the download limit. The promo I have joined through is $20-$25 lower than the regular price per month. I think that’s fair of the site. If they’re going to lower how much you can download they should lower the price. It’s a good enough site that consistently updates and has good scenes consistently, to keep a membership to it. I used to only do yearly memberships with Kink.

The models they get are as pretty as any site has. That’s something that I like a lot since it’s hardcore. You don’t see as many really pretty models in hardcore on most sites.

The style of scenes has changed a little over the last few years. Used to it was more like a swinger site. The wife would take the husband out and tell him to “find” a teen to have a threesome with. The newer scenes are just one on one and there’s not a lot of searching the clubs for the right one. I am sure Covid plays a part in that. I understand that.

The sex is good enough that they don’t need as much build-up or story. Other hardcore sites could learn from that. They are doing something at the Fidelity sites that other hardcore sites are not doing. Share it please. I won’t review the Kelly Madison site, but it is included. You get a lot of content with this package and nearly all of it is good.

05-11-22  07:35am

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Great site for those that likes variety in female models. Probably the best, even.

Very large site that I have been a member of for nearly a year and still don’t think I have seen everything.

Higher quality than I initially expected, and it has been high quality for a long time.

Some of the most realistic porn I have ever watched.

The navigation is very easy, and the categories help you find anything you are looking for.

Besides being a large site, it updates 6 times per week.
Cons: The older scenes are lower quality and those are not even easy to find.

I don’t know that these are all amateur models. I recognize several of them and one of my favorites, I know she is on other sites. The amateur/pro label is probably stretched a little.
Bottom Line: The first time I joined Girls Out West, I really wasn’t for sure if I liked it. I do like a variety of models. It was one of the first sites I joined. I wasn’t really ready for this much variety. The variety is more than just skin complexion which they have a lot of different complexions. They also have very hairy models. They have heavier models, including close to Big Beautiful Women. It reminded me of a network that decided to stick all of its fetishes on one site. They do mix these models and types up. They will have a smaller woman with a big woman. A shaved woman with a very hairy woman. Kind of be prepared for that.

That is why I signed up for a year. The sex is very real. That made me want to see more. Over time, the model difference did not make much difference to me. I believe that is what they are going for. There are not a lot of stories or plots. It is more about emotion. This is advertised as a site owned by women and filmed by women. I don’t know how much difference that makes. I do see differences from regular porn. There isn’t anything robotic or planned. The scenes develop naturally. You don’t have that feel of “they have not done this yet; it’s going to be next”. You can’t do that on this site. I do believe it could throw your porn expectations balance out of whack.

The site size is very big and they have high quality. The videos have had 4K download option since 2017. They also offer 1080p, 720p and 576p. Even the 2012 videos have the 1080p and 720p options. They list over 2,000 videos that have at least 720p and 1080p. They do have picture sets you can download. I wasn’t expecting that the first time I joined it. I was thinking it’s an amateur site, they would not have high quality, but they do.

The part I was surprised by are the male with female scenes. There are not many of those. I didn’t expect any. I do not believe they are shooting anymore male with female scenes. The last I found was April 2020. Considering they update 6 days a week, I believe they would have had a new male with female scene if they were still filming that style. Besides being prepared for the variety of models, there are some things you have to get used to. Besides very hairy pubic areas some of these women have hairy armpits. That doesn’t bother me, but I know others have talked about not liking that. It is not something I find attractive, but with this style of porn, it is what they are going for. Very natural women and they are mostly all Australian. I have never been there. I don’t know if that is more common in Australia or not. Besides the small amount of male with female scenes there are some solo scenes too. I really liked those. The female models seem to be very comfortable and relaxed even going into the videos. I feel like I am getting a lesson in culture. The categories make this one of the few sites I have ever been on that the categories make sense and are accurate.

I always pay attention to the user ratings of scenes. I find that very interesting on these scenes. Some of the heavier models have solo scenes and are some of the highest rated scenes. Another blow to your porn expectation balance, the interviews are good and enjoyable to watch. Some of those have multiple females that are nude throughout the interview. They laugh, they touch each other and play around. My favorite scenes are the ones with more than 2 women. There is something about that I like. They do those lesbian threesomes better than anyone. My feelings on the looks of the models. There are some really cute and pretty females. There are some that look like normal, average women. I believe those will vary in popularity from person to person. I do believe that is what messed up my first time as a member. The combination of seeing the model as an average woman then seeing the huge pubic hair and hairy arms and armpits.

Besides that, the site is near perfect. I have heard the saying, your mileage may vary. I do believe the looks of the models could turn some people away. That is the double-edged sword of this site. Everything technical is right. I would recommend if you think you like it, join for longer than a month. The scenes can be long, the interviews are worth watching, especially if you like certain models that are in the interviews. I felt like it took me about 2 months to really like the site. It is now one of my favorite sites. I believe that is better than joining a site and being bored with it after 5 days. One of my favorites.

03-20-22  10:42pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: In my opinion the best older/younger site, period
Eastern European women who are simply eye candy.

There is no mention of a download limit and I did not find one

Comes with three other excellent sites in the Sensual Girl Network

808 scenes are available for download in at least 720p high definition, 4K for the newest scenes.

Navigation is good on all their sites.
Cons: Not enough variety in the guys. Every one of them is in multiple scenes

The oldest scenes have lesser quality
Bottom Line: They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. What can I say about a classic as well as iconic site that is often imitated and never equaled? I have been a member of other sites that pair older men with much younger women, but I feel this is the best there is of its type.

I find that older men are sexy and I am not ashamed to say that. I feel that they are much more polite and gentlemanly than men close to my age and know how to appreciate a lady. On this site it says that for a man to apply to be a model, he must be at least 55. The same few men appear in many scenes, but I guess at that age there are not many guys who could be models. The women are a stark contrast though, as they appear to be barely legal to maybe at most age 25.

The age contrast is a major focus here as the scenes emphasize the fantasy very well. The most unlikely stories are brought to life. A man’s creditors come after him and a young lady offers herself to a group of guys as compensation instead of cash. A man is relaxing in the park and a model is so turned on by seeing him that she strips and then unzips his pants. The cleaning lady is wearing a French maid outfit. She bends over and shows him the goods. He calls a friend to tell him how sexy she is. In turn she overhears the conversation and takes his pants off. I am sure that someone is getting paid big bucks to come up with these ideas.

I think the models are Eastern European and a few I do recognize such as Ria Sunn, Lady Dee and Gina Gershon. Most of the models are very thin, but a few have nice bodies that are more filled out and womanly. They look great here and I think better than I have seen them on other sites. They look so hot and sexy that I wish they had some lesbian scenes with them and older women. Why should older guys have all the fun? I also think they are in some of their first scenes as they look really young and more importantly fresh and eager to have a good time. I can imagine these guys bragging to their friends about being with these women.

I have seen some of these guys on other older/younger sites too. I am very impressed by how well the guys perform. Some look very distinguished, with nice beards and some are not my cup of tea. The guys are not large by porn standards and the loads not the biggest you can find on the internet, but the fantasy works well for me anyway. I felt like the proverbial kid in the candy shop, wondering which scene or scenes I should watch today. It is tempting to skip work and stay home.

The site is easy to navigate and the videos seem to be in a number order. There are no dates, but the latest video is numbered 808. I see in the review by Exotics in October a video count of 799, so I think that there are about two updates a month. There are photo sets for each video, but I did not pay them any attention as I just am not into photos.

This is the site that is the main attraction in the Sensual Girl Network. The others are Class Nudes, Class Blowjobs and Class Threesome. I liked all of them, but this one is by far my favorite.

02-05-22  11:31am

Replies (1)
Review
10
Visit Love Her Feet

Love Her Feet
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Pornusers discount of only $12.95 for a month

Top quality production values with 240 scenes and about six updates per month.

Easy search function

Every model has perfect feet and pedicures

Models are all well known Americans who are stunningly beautiful

Download quality as high as 4K
Cons: I would like more than 6 new updates per month or a bigger archive.

If you're not into foot fetishes you probably won't like this site as much as I do.
Bottom Line: The director is Andrew Youngman who has directed 1000’s of porn movies over the past 20 years. He is one of the few porn directors I follow the content of. His dream was to make the best porn foot fetish site in the world. He tries to get every camera angle as strategically chosen to make for the best scene possible. Every frame of every scene has the feet as the focus. The production values are beautiful as you see an attention to detail that is highly uncommon in porn.

There are models who wear pantyhose, stockings and heels and their legs look invitingly fantastic. In every scene there is a different premise. Sometimes it is family like stepsister and brother, in other scenes it may be older younger, or power differences like attorney and client or tutor and student. In every scene the man is so turned on by her feet that he literally cannot help but get carried away. There is plenty of toe sucking to be sure, but there are also plenty of footjobs where her feet massage his cock. In every scene the sex comes next and the heat from the foot foreplay builds to a climax. The action flows naturally as for example in a scene where he rubs his dick on her feet and then she is inspired to give him a footjob. He comes on her feet with a nice cumshot visual that I really like. In some scenes she licks his cum off her feet. It does not get any better than that. I saw an awe inspiring hot scene where a foot job lead to a blowjob. In another he is fucking her face and she offers him her feet to suck on. He goes back and forth. If I can imagine a foot scene, it probably is on this site.

Many of the tags are designed for a foot site. Where else do you see a tag for nail polish color or size of her feet? The site is very easy to use and the downloads were fast. You can even get the scenes in 4K. The models are well known Americans who have made many scenes before. I suspect that many have not done foot fetish videos though. The attractiveness of the models is a given and there is a nice level of racial variety too. I love foot fetish videos and I feel this Is my new favorite site. Even better is that the price is only $13 for a month.

08-31-21  08:08am

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit Pure Taboo

Pure Taboo
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Dark, moody, roleplay porn that I forgot to review.

They are now up to 285 scenes with regular weekly updates.

Excellent, even believable acting and stories that are much better than the average site.

Production values are as high on this site as any site.

Scenes are long, but not too long, average around 45 minutes.

Plays on all the popular taboos including stepfamily, betrayal and trickery.
Cons: The writing is good, the acting is good, but they do have some scenes that try to be too dark story wise. It could make some uncomfortable.

It's too bad they can't release more than one scene per week.
Bottom Line: I was going to review Pure Taboo a few months ago, but there were already two new reviews for it at the time. I almost forgot about reviewing it. This is easily one of my favorite "normal" sites. I know it is strange to call a taboo site "normal", but I do see it that way. The production values, acting and writing are all top-notch for a porn site. There are times that the males overact in attempted "intimidation" roles.

The video quality is very good with all 285 scenes have 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. The most recent 164 scenes also have 4K. I was happy to see the addition of English captions as well.

The scenes also include a photo set you can download, but they are usually just 25-40 pictures in each.

I don't think Pure Taboo is that groundbreaking or even that unique. A lot of sites do the story-driven scenes, the taboos are not as taboo anymore with all the stepfamily porn sites available. Which is what pushes them ahead. They push the models to give their best possible acting performances, they use lights to change the mood of the scenes, they also do add the overacting male. That is not normal in porn. Except for those guys that sound like an elephant that got shot when they cum. Overacting in porn has always been the role of the female models. The men in most of the scenes seem to be a mix between Hannibal Lector and that big, scary professional wrestler. The Deadman guy. Each viewer will see that differently. If you are wrapped up in the story the scary or intimidating, overacting male can be very believable. I do think that separates Pure Taboo from other taboo sites or even scenes. There's a slight moment of uneasiness that tries to make you question if it's acting or real.

This site to me is the best at what it does and that is give the viewer a realistic chance to use their imagination while watching porn. Many sites with the taboo backdrop ruin the scenes with humor or the she's not really that scared overacting female model. I would recommend it to any porn fan as long as they keep in mind it's fictional.

09-08-20  11:00pm

Replies (1)
Review
12
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site that focuses on the pleasure and the intensity of a woman's emotions and feelings during an orgasm.

I don't want to compare this directly to The Female Orgasm, but did a review on it last week -- I prefer I Feel Myself.

They have 5,190 videos, these range from studio, homemade, closeup, fantasy and adventure.

These videos -- especially the newer ones -- are more explicit than other sites like the one and I see that as a plus.

Excellent use of artistic representations, the rooms are mostly bare, the light isn't blaring bright and it creates a distant, lonely feeling for the solo model.

They average 10-12 updates per month and as far as I can tell these are all amateurs.

Expresses the beauty of the female orgasm without requiring a perfect or fit body with models of all different shapes and sizes.

Billed through a biller I was not familiar with, GM Bill, but it was easy to use and easy to cancel.
Cons: The navigation is difficult. They have 12 videos per page, 433 pages.

It is not all solo, they have in the 700 range of girl/girl and boy/girl scenes. That's a tough con to use against them, but the site is I Feel Myself.
Bottom Line: This site should be joined for more than 1 month. I find the explicit, solo masturbation scenes to be my favorite. There's excellent camerawork that includes perfect sound. You see the women's faces as the orgasm, you hear their moans, you can see some of their orgasms causing contractions.

There's a high amount of voyeuristic quality to the scenes. You get the feeling of the fly on the wall.

I listed the non-solo scenes as a con, but only by definition of the site's name. Some of those scenes are very good. Of all the sites I have joined (not that many), this one has to be in the top 3 for eroticism.

You will find yourself not paying as much attention to how the model looks, or what her body shape and size is, instead, paying attention to her bodily movements, spasms, moans and how her hand carelessly reaches up to squeeze her nipple harder than she probably meant to.

I have told in previous reviews I am not a lesbian. I am not even bi-curious. I am drawn to this content for the natural sexual expression, it could be a man or woman and it would work either way.

The site itself doesn't have a lot to talk about. Over 5,000 videos, there's no model list, the navigation is close to archaic, but they do have ways for you to find the different content. If you find a model you like you can click her name and it will show you if they have other scenes of her. They have the scenes broken into categories including one called "friends" that focus on the scenes with girl/girl content and boy/girl content.

The site doesn't look like it is have been updated in layout style or programming in 20 years, but everything works well.

If I find anything truly disappointing with it it is the multi-month or long-term membership options. They offer a 3 month plan for $70. I am on my 6th week and probably would have been better off joining it for 3 months, but $70 just seems like a steep price to pay upfront.

I also wonder if they have considered making a boy/girl site in similar style. I usually prefer high production qualities. These scenes are probably the most basic I've seen and it works for them.

I'm going to go a little off-track by saying as much as I like the desolate, lonely room, I would like to see more open scenes, maybe outdoors or in a different room, position -- like on the couch or in the bathtub.

The video quality does vary. They have HD videos going back to 2009. I haven't seen any picture sets.

A lot of the older scenes are less explicit, but overall, this site has impressed me in nearly every way. I'll come back to it eventually. The content is worth the price. I would recommend it to men and women alike. This just doesn't feel like a porn site. It feels like genuine, human sexual expression and that's something you just don't see a lot of. Very highly recommended.

09-16-19  10:48pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Ladyboy Gold

Ladyboy Gold
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A large network of ladyboys and some transsexuals. There are 11 sites included. Only 4-5 are listed here. This is promoted like it’s the hub for the network, but it’s a separate site from the others.

Nearly 850 scenes with one update per month on Ladyboy Gold.

Very pretty and cute ladyboys. There is a good blend of the traditional ladyboys, that are likely transgender and taking hormones. Combined with the ladyboys that have implants.

A lot of frotting in the newer scenes. It is a fetish I have and enjoy. Don’t ask, you don’t want to know. Look it up on Google.

A lot of scenes with 4K downloads.

Some of the scenes are very long, going into the 70 minute range even.

Nearly 3,000 downloadable photo sets.
Cons: It gets listed as a network and people may not realize this is a site in and of itself that includes other sites. I’m basing that on my knowledge of straight porn networks with a hub. This is the flagship site not the hub.

This site goes more into the standard sex scenes. The consistency from one scene to another can be way off. The length of the scenes varies from 12 minutes to 74 minutes. You also have the traditional ladyboys mixed in with the more transgender ladyboys.
Bottom Line: I do believe some of this content is used from their other sites and maybe some of the newer is licensed from other sites, but I don’t mind that. I don’t know of any other ladyboy sites other than ones that cost nearly $40 a month to join.

Most of the content on this site is a lot like the content on Ladyboys Fucked Bareback. There are a few of those scenes also listed on this site. This is more, in my opinion, entry-level ladyboy content. The scenes are mostly straightforward and some are very long. What I like about this site is it doesn’t just stick to one type of ladyboys. Some of these ladyboys are more like transgender. They are having hormone therapy. They don’t get implants and start to grow at least some natural boobs. There are the more traditional ladyboys that have implants and are not having hormone therapy. It gives you a good view of the niche.

I did list the photos as part of this site, but they’re really part of the entire network. You just can’t download them on the different sites. It’s on the bar at the top of your member’s area. You probably won’t download a video from one of their sites then leave the site to go see if there is a photo set. A lot of the scenes on their other sites do have matching photo sets. I don’t understand why they don’t put those on the scene. Their photos are pretty good. This network excels at something other transsexual and ladyboy sites fail at. It captures the ladyboy as a human. Not just as a sex object. I have known people that lived in Asian countries. They were aware of the ladyboys. I don’t know if porn has corrupted the view of ladyboys. This site has these long scenes that include the ladyboy playing around on the bed in her panties. Maybe teasing the male. You can see the feminine nature of these models. I really enjoy it. I think even most transsexuals and ladyboys would say it’s not for everyone.

This site has the nearly 3,000 downloadable photo sets and around 1,350 videos. The whole network has over 3,000 videos. It shows this is not the hub. It works as the hub. I am sure that the glut of all the straight networks has led us to see a network hub and think it doesn’t have any content on it other than what’s on the sites. It would be easy to miss these 1,350 videos.

The sites that are included are: LB Girlfriends, Ladyboy Obsession, Ladyboy Crush, Ladyboy Wank which is a favorite of mine, but it’s not listed, Ladyboy Angel, Ladyboy Dildo and the other four sites I reviewed separately. This is a huge network.

Ladyboy Wank is very clearly telling us what it’s about. It is just solo scenes. You will see some ladyboys on Ladyboy Gold that fall into that rare area of having a larger, but feminine frame. One of my favorites is Bipor. She is from Pattaya, 28 listed on the site. She has maybe colored contacts, crystal blue eyes and is 5’7” 120 with a 6 inch dick. She’s so feminine. You can tell she loves wearing stockings. That newer scene with her in it has a lot of frotting in it.

This site and the network as a whole is a very good join, especially if you haven’t been a member before or recently. I am pretty sure my last time as a member was in 2020. There are a lot of scenes I am downloading that I did not have. There is even cosplay. It has a little bit of everything. I would recommend it over probably any transsexual or ladyboy site especially to a person that’s new to this genre and niche.

02-08-22  06:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Kink.com

Kink.com
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: My longtime favorite network of sites, but it HAD lost some of my interest.

New Kink produced scenes are getting better by the update.

Another massive site with 19,250 scenes

A lot of updates with a good portion being from other studios.

Remastering of old scenes to bring them into better resolutions.

Still one of the most creative sites and excellent production values.

The updates from other studios/sites have led me to join a few of those sites.
Cons: This one is going to be me knowing how the Kink community is, the new updates just feature a lot more emphasis on gay men. I like most gay men porn, but with Kink once being straight focused with the separate Kink Men site, it’s going to need to be mentioned as a potential con for some.

Most of my old favorite sites on here are no longer updating.

Mixing in scenes produced by other sites and studios does give some inconsistency.
Bottom Line: For close to 10 years, I have joined the different sites of Kink (before it became a network) and have many favorites. I let my yearly membership lapse when Covid cut into the updates and instead, opted to join Evil Angel for a year. This was my first month back on Kink in nearly 2 years.

The licensed content they are using from other studios is easily described as hit or miss. I have joined Wasteland after watching the scenes on Kink and do like it for its weirdness. The first thing I noticed was how many of the updates, including licensed ones, are gay men content. I join gay porn sites, but I do wonder if that will be a problem with those used to Kink being straight-focused. The number of updates is impressive even if it’s licensed. Just over the last two weeks (1-12-22), there have been 36 updates. Some of the licensed content is from sites I know and like, like Hot Legs and Feet, some is from sites I hadn’t heard of like Twisted Visual and Filthy Femdom, while some, like Wasteland, are sites I was familiar with, but hadn’t viewed much of their content. I wouldn’t have thought this was a good idea until I joined in December 2021. It, to me, has lost some of the Kink feel, but it also has become a site where you can get new Kink scenes and scenes from all these other sites you probably haven’t heard of or wouldn’t risk joining without seeing more of their content. The remasters of the old scenes is just icing on the cake.

If you just focus on the Kink produced updates there have been 10 over the last two weeks. That’s certainly not bad. That does include a few remasters. The one part I believe is missing in the newer Kink produced scenes is you don’t see the defined theme. Those are all labeled as Kink.com. Once you click the scene, you will see the names of the old sites like, “Everything Butt”. The newer scenes I have watched are taking a more hardcore approach and they have been able to retain some of their most popular models like Daisy Ducati. I see them going for content similar to Pure Taboo with a dark, gritty, story-based theme that carries from scene to scene. The current series is Torrential. These scenes are rough, possibly making Pure Taboo look a lot tamer than it did. I don’t see the scenes as being too rough, but some might.

One of the biggest complaints I remember about the older scenes was the video quality. At one time, the highest download option was 720p. I have read part of that was because how long the scenes are. The newest scene in the Torrential series is 58 minutes. But the newer scenes now come with the 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. The remastered scenes have 1080p added as well. I don’t see them going to 4K. The 58 minute 1080p Torrential scene is 4.1 GB.

That’s all about the newer content and how impressive it is. You still have full access to all the old sites and content as well. I will watch for a promo and may give it another try for a year. I believe the weirdness of sites like Wasteland would draw a big interest, especially from Sci-Fi fans. Their writer for their synopsis for each scene is funny and makes the scenes have a light-hearted feel to them. I’m not up at 99 like I was a few years ago, but that is partially because I have only been back long enough to really see what they’re doing with the newer and licensed content. I don’t see a reason to push people away from joining considering the amount of updates, even if 2/3 are licensed scenes.

01-12-22  08:57am

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Club Sweethearts

Club Sweethearts
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Everything about it is innocent except the producer and cameraman!

Incredibly large site with 7,197 videos and 10,309 picture sets

There are 4,056 models forever stuck at 18

Good sorting and searching features including by series, niche and date

Video quality goes up to 4K and downloads are unlimited.

There are too many “cute” niches on here for a straight woman. I have avoided this type of porn for a reason! I have been a member on this network for several months and just looked at this site for the first time last week.
Cons: If you’re a straight woman you may not feel like one after a membership here.

Maybe it could be too cute to some.

I don’t know if it’s fair to list overwhelming as a con.
Bottom Line: I won’t explain my last pro anymore than is needed. I usually avoid this cute, teen, being innocently kinky porn. I never experienced anything like this, at that age, in India. It makes it something that intrigues me now and I’m old enough to be most of these models’ mom. Maybe some of you guys can explain how you deal with that? Does the “eww, I’m being creepy” feeling go away?

The scenes are not as innocent as I expected. A lot of them are. The newest update might explain my concern and problem with this type of porn. The model, Rita Fox, looks to have some baby fat on her and is bent over, grabbing her ankles, while wearing a bikini. I looked away several times. The innocence of the scenes is lost just 4-5 scenes later when you see one of these innocent teens sucking a BBC like a pro. I still feel creepy.

The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The older ones do decline as expected. The scenes cover a lot of different niches. I am admitting ignorance, I thought this type of site only had teasing and scenes to make me feel like a pervert. I still do, but these innocent models are no more innocent than the producer and cameraman.

The picture sets add a lot. I have started looking at more pictures the last few months. I am starting to wonder if video killed the pornography star. If you know the song, it somehow made its way to India and was played 50 times a day. I am impressed by the variety. There is hardcore, softcore, lesbian, group, and the slumber parties. That creepy feeling is looking around the corner at me.

I couldn’t believe the number of scenes at over 7,000 and over 10,000 picture sets. I just wish there was a way to make my own filter that would be titled, “Scenes that are like this one”. That is maybe the biggest con for me. This is overwhelming. I have found several scenes I really like, but there are thousands to go through to find more like it. Where is the “scenes like this one” when you need it? The solo scenes are even good and I usually don’t like solo female. I really think it has something to do with the site creating a taboo feeling in me. There are outdoor scenes too. Not for sure if that qualifies as exhibitionism. The group scenes are my current favorites. I didn’t know models this age performed in group scenes or even knew group sex was a thing. I need to get away from that BDSM content, the real fetishes are on sites like this. I can tie myself up. I can’t create a five 19 year old teens slumber party. I guess I could.

This site is maybe getting me with the newness (to me) of it. I could take a vacation for a few weeks and not even get 1/10th of the way of through this site. If my feelings on it drop off after the newness wears off, I will adjust the score, but right now I’m thinking the score is very fair for all this content and quality of it.

12-08-21  08:45am

Replies (1)
Review
16
Visit Pure CFNM

Pure CFNM
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Six excellent PureCFNM sites are included in the subscription.

Great video quality and photosets. Downloadable with no limits.

Uses CCBill for easy billing and cancellation.

The videos can be downloaded in a trailer, 480p, 720p and 1080p. 4K is not an option.

Has some of the best porn for women to enjoy.

Logging into the network gets you access to every site very easily.

Still updating despite the pandemic. August had 15 new scenes.
Cons: No easy search ability. It is adequate though.

Some of the sites in the network have degradation of men. I am not a fan of that.
Bottom Line: The amount of porn aimed at women is rather limited and it is probably the most untapped market in porn. However, this network is about as good as it gets. I like that many newer scenes are more interactive between the women and the men. I like that the sites are evolving to where the women start off clothed then gradually go to partially or fully nude. That has not always been the case for CFNM sites, and in the past that was true of this one also. The women are a mix of both amateurs and pros and I think for this type of porn that works well. The amateurs look like someone you could know, nicely dressed, but with a British accent. The amateurs look very real and there reactions are very believable and genuine. In many scenes they are wearing sexy pantyhose and I have a hose fetish. They don’t have any Indian women and there sure are plenty in the UK. I volunteer to be the first.

Pure CFNM is the main site here. It has been around a long time, so some of the oldest videos are SD quality. There are 760 scenes and have a little bit of story to them.

Amateur CFNM is not completely amateur as I recognized a handful of pornstars. The amateurs are not perfect looking models, but they have a genuine charm that I like.166 scenes.

Lady Voyeurs has a great future as it has a theme that is rare and quite entertaining. Men masturbate for the women to get pleasure from watching. The scenes just get better and better with each update. The women have become more actively involved and show enthusiasm as well as some skin. 286 scenes.

CFNM Games is a small site that was fun, but sometimes quite unbelievable. There are only 24 scenes, but I feel they are very much hit and miss.

Girls Abuse Guys and Hey Little Dick have degradation of men as a theme. Sometimes they are a bit over the top, between name calling and spitting there is not much to like in my mind. I like pegging, but not abusively. GAG has 91 scenes and HLD has 134.

There have been updates even during the pandemic and August had 15. The totals for the network are 1461 scenes and 672 models. I highly recommend the network as I downloaded more than half of those scenes.

09-08-20  10:45pm

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Bi Empire

Bi Empire
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: In my opinion, the best bisexual site, but it’s not without faults

There are 255 scenes. Up until 3 weeks ago, it was updating weekly, but has not been updated over the last 3 weeks.

The models include some mainstream porn models which is not normal for bisexual sites. There are 214 models total (male and female).

Videos are downloadable (extra cost) in 480p, 720p and 1080p. This is also not normal since most bisexual scenes are from 2013 or before. The ones here started in 2016.

Nearly all the models of both sexes are very attractive.

Professional production compared to more amateurish production on other bisexual sites.
Cons: You have to pay extra for downloads. The price for the site is $9.95. To add downloads, it’s $14.95 more. They are worth it if you are into bisexual.

Probiller is difficult to cancel.

Even with good production the niche limits itself to get everyone involved.
Bottom Line: I do not like joining sites from the company that owns this one, but my bisexual collection needed some higher quality scenes and if you are looking for higher quality bisexual scenes you will not find many bisexual sites that match this one.

One of the first things you will notice are the known mainstream models. Lady Dee, Sarah Key, Rae Lil Black, Cindy Shine and Jennifer Mendez to name a few. Most bisexual sites have performers that are either amateurs or ones you have not heard of. The other option with bisexual sites is they do not even give you the names. I do believe seeing mainstream actresses filming bisexual scenes with two men shows the niche is growing in popularity.

You will also notice when you try to download a scene you receive the pop-up that says you do not have access to downloads. The membership with downloads added costs $25. It is worth that if you can download all 255 scenes in a month. I do not understand why they do not offer the downloads at sign-up.

The male models on this site makes it my personal favorite. I do think we are seeing male professional models turning to the way female professional models did a long time ago – gay for pay. Very few of the males are effeminate. Most of them even look like they are a dominant male in a male/female scene. Which is where the professional production helps this site. The most common lead-in for bisexual sites is the boyfriend/girlfriend talking and the girlfriend telling the boyfriend there’s a guy she knows who is willing to give him a blowjob or anal sex if he will let the guy have sex with her. The scenes here mostly start out with a male and female having sex. Another male enters the scene and it usually will turn into what looks like a regular, straight male/female/male threesome. That is when they change the script and the new guy in the scene pulls the guys dick out of the woman and starts sucking it.

The video quality is also a big step up from most bisexual sites. I have a large collection of bisexual scenes from other sites. It seems like from 2007-2012, the niche was gaining some popularity, but fell off. Most bisexual sites these days have the content recorded from 2007-2012. The videos here started being published in 2016. You have the 720p and 1080p download options.

The site is easy to use. It has clear menus, a model list and only one ad.

I did not have as much problems with canceling through Probiller as I have in the past. I followed another member’s advice and just sent an email to them. They replied back with a special offer for one of their other sites and cancellation confirmation.

If you go into this site looking at it as a premium bisexual site and knowing you are going to pay $25 for the site with downloads, it is really not a bad deal. Hopefully, someone will make a new bisexual site in the future and will start It out using the same principles they use on Biempire.

08-12-20  12:59am

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit FTM Men

FTM Men
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I’m using FTM as the Bareback Plus hub for this review. Bareback Plus isn’t listed.

Six sites that include two relatively rare FTM transgender sites. It also has four gay sites with it.

Downloads cost extra but are worth it if you’re into the niches. Those can be downloaded up to 1080p.

Includes Jason Sparks Live which is one of the best amateur gay sites going.

Almost always has a $19.95 promo when you visit the site.

I don’t know if getting to see an obscure niche in porn and even in daily life is a pro, but you get that on this network.
Cons: It took the world of porn around 40 years to accept and like transsexual porn. Transgender is the next step and I’m thinking FTM will have the most difficulty unless from female users. I will try and explain it below.

Needs better pictures and zip downloads. The FTM niche would be a lot better with pictures. I know that videos are just pictures in action, but action kind of messes this niche up. Too much movement.
Bottom Line: FTM porn is Female to Male transition. The transsexual porn we are used to is Male to Female transition. FTM offers females the same shock and maybe giggles that transsexual porn offers males. In FTM we see a handsome faced male, sometimes has a beard, muscular chest, hairy chest, and masculine features all the way down the model’s torso. And then, there’s a pussy. How did that get there? I know from males that they had the same reaction the first time they saw a MTF transsexual. Pretty and feminine face, boobs, feminine torso, then a dick. How did that get there?

That is what FTM is. You can look at the previews of this site FTM or the other FTM site included Jock Pussy. Both of those will make understanding what I’m talking about a lot easier to understand. I have seen FTM models on standard transsexual sites. I haven’t seen full sites dedicated to the FTM models until this one and Jock Pussy. If you’re not confused, the “network” itself may confuse you. It comes with Jock Pussy, FTM, Jason Sparks Live, Bound Twinks, Twink Loads and Raw Fuck Boys.

It's a very rare niche in porn. I have seen it listed as unappreciated. You may not realize it, but what FTM porn equals is a dick having sex with a pussy. It’s gender bending. It looks like two men having sex. But one of those men is a biological woman. That’s why I don’t really see the addition of these two sites on an otherwise gay network. I consider it very interesting to watch. The FTM models can look as masculine as any man you have ever seen, but you can usually tell by their mannerisms and body language that their nature is of a female. If you think seeing a beautiful, slender transsexual is attractive, you may at least like to see these FTM models that are handsome and built like an athletic man with a pussy.

The two sites combined have nearly 150 scenes between them. The scenes are not much different. You do get some threesomes. Which can be really confusing but can also be very good. Often times, one of the models with a dick has to stand to the side and masturbate. The pictures are one of the big drawbacks of the site. This seems to be a niche made for pictures. The resolution is not very good and no zip downloads. You do have to pay extra for video downloads. I think the two FTM sites are worth it one time. It’s just so different than anything you’re going to see on other sites. Different doesn’t always mean good. Check the previews before joining.

I know this is an odd way to show a niche that this site and Jock Pussy cover well, but it is something I noticed in the scenes. If you like seeing a hairy pussy receiving oral, this site probably does that better than any. The models have the hairy hormones. Some of these FTM models are hairier than any male models I have seen. It almost feels more like I have joined a site for the educational reasons. The bonus, if you’re into gay sites is the partial network of 4 gay sites.

I don’t know who this type of porn is aimed at. I would recommend it to everyone just to see the looks of shock. Instead, I will say check out the previews. The quality of videos is very good with up to 1080p downloads. The site works well. I like it, but without any way to know if it’s updates or being able to see a pattern of updates, I don’t know if it has much long-term value.

06-07-22  03:29pm

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit TS Playground

TS Playground
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: My continued favorite transsexual site.

954 scenes and a new update every 4-5 days.

The prettiest transsexuals without turning to outrageously expensive Asian T-Girl sites

Video downloads are of excellent quality and the photo sets are not bad, also downloadable.

I would be okay with every scene being solo, but they’re not, this is still one of the biggest solo transsexual sites I have been on with 641 listed in the categories section as solo.

Pairs well with their Transsexual Angel site to give you even more content. You could join the network just for the TS content (over 2,000 scenes between those two sites)
Cons: Only 30 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women.

They could do a little more with the scenery. A few of the newer scenes are outdoors.
Bottom Line: The second con is something I will start with. It’s transsexual porn with the majority of the scenes with solo. It’s similar to male solo scenes. There really isn’t that much that can be done with the scenes. It’s a male or transsexual masturbating, but if you watch female solo porn, there are different locations, pools, gyms, outdoors, in public, while both the transsexual and male solo scenes are almost always on a couch or recliner. That could eventually start being a problem for me.

There just doesn’t seem to be a market for transsexuals with women. I know better, but to show the scarcity of it, there were five new transsexuals with women scenes in 2021. The previous one before those five was in November 2019. It does look like they have realized there is a market for transsexual with women. Five in 2021, zero in 2020, one in 2019, one in 2018, one in 2017, one in 2016. There were around 15 in 2015 and before. Hopefully, that is a good sign for the future.

I do believe these are the prettiest transsexuals on an American site I have seen. I still like the Asian T-Girls best, but those sites cost double, even triple what this site does and usually have a lesser number of scenes. There are 641 solo scenes, and that is the reason you should join, if you are joining for the TS scenes. I don’t know if this is sexist to say, but transsexuals having sex together or with men is rarely that appealing to me. One of the best scenes on this site is also one of my favorite scenes from any site. It is Carol Penelope, Nina Lins and Spencer Fox. That’s a very sexy transsexual, pretty woman and the guy is mostly blocked out by those two.

The download options on videos do vary. The site has been around since 2012. I believe all scenes are directed by Jay Sin, who is one of the better directors of transsexual porn. The solo scenes, as limited as those are by nature, are still good and don’t feel too repetitive. I do like seeing the transsexual dressed up in pretty lingerie. It’s a weird fetish of seeing my ex-husband wearing lingerie. I would recommend this site as a starting point for straight men that are maybe interested in a little something different or more. While it is on a network that’s not known for being classy, the scenes on TS Playground are on the classier side. The transsexuals are very close to looking like women, with many of them looking more like women than men until they take their pants and underwear off. One of my favorites is Keite Fenandes, you should look her up if you’re curious. I think my feeling is if enough straight men start watching transsexual porn there will be on the market, especially scenes with women. I don’t know if that’s being too closeminded, but it seems like having transsexuals with women would be a bigger market than transsexuals with men or other transsexuals.

This is my favorite transsexual site and I do include Transsexual Angels in that since it comes with the network. You get quality, quantity and a new scene every 4-5 days. I believe it makes Evil Angel one of the best buys. I am working on getting more into their other sites. This could be the perfect network for me.

01-12-22  08:50am

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit ChickPass Network

ChickPass Network
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Updates once or twice a day

Both 4K and High Definition downloads are offered

The site says the scenes are exclusive and I think most of the models are as well.

I did not find any download limits

Pornusers offers a discounted price
Cons: Older scenes are not High Definition

The site needs more Indian American models. Just joking as they have one and I am not sure there is another they could find to add.
Bottom Line: There is a lot I like about this site as it is so very different from most porn sites I have been a member of. Yes it has sex, but that is not all you get for your membership. You get a site that kind of breaks the mold. What I mean is that the videos mostly star only one male model, Logan, who also owns the site and is the contact for customer service. It has an old fashioned, hands on feel to it, except that porn like this is not as common as I would like.

He is an older gentleman who calls himself a geek. Balding and with a paunch, he is polite and even deferential towards the amateur models. He talks to them and asks them questions. He seems incredulous that they would have sex with him. I like that in a man, one who appreciates his woman. He looks like someone I would find attractive in real life. Most men in porn expect that women should be grateful for an opportunity to be with them. How self entitled and a turn off is that? Give me a polite gentleman and I sit up and take notice. At the end of many scenes he thanks the model and asks if she would like to come back.

Part of the reason I say this is that I am from India, where being modest and not being full of yourself is considered very important. Besides that, older men are highly respected as we see them as power figures, much more so than do women in the United States. In India it is very common for older men to marry much younger women.

The sex is not your same old same old porn sex either. There are no extreme acts and the sex is done the way us non pornstars find pleasure. For example he often cums in the woman’s mouth and she closes her mouth around it with the cum inside. You don’t always get to see the cum or the cumshot, but you can tell by the realistic body language and moans that the orgasm is real. Porn sex is in some ways not real life sex and this site benefits from that touch of realism.

The models are completely unassuming as well. They enjoy the sex and quite sincerely seem to like him. They are not barely legal and they are not innocent either. They come across as self confident and happy to be in the scene. They are very much women you night meet in real life at a party, a bar or even a get together with your neighbors.

Another thing I appreciate about the models is that there is no set pattern or look that they share. Some are short, some tall, some thin, some white, some black, some Asian and some are Latina. Being from India I was delighted to see that rare type of model, a woman who is Indian American. There is a large Indian American community in New Jersey and Naomi Shah is from there. In India most women don’t shave, but in this country we nearly all do. Her body is very lean, clean shaved, she has a pretty face and has a few tattoos. Many Indian women have them. You see a stripper who has a very positive attitude towards nudity and also regarding sex. She has only twelve scenes, including an interview. Most are blow jobs or masturbation and there is also some vaginal. My only complaint is that she does not have more scenes. I am not sure who enjoyed her scenes more, her or the male model Logan. She seems to really like his penis and looks comfortable being naturally sexy.

The site uses a layout that I have not seen before. It was not hard to figure out and everything you need is there. It uses tags for an easy search and some of the scenes are available in both 4K as well as High Definition. The site has been adding one or two updates a day and has a very large archive of more than 6200 videos going back to 2008. Obviously some older scenes have lower quality.

10-28-21  07:56pm

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit Deeper

Deeper
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I knew I would eventually find a hardcore, dark, artsy combination site.

Excellent production values, some scenes tie together and the scenes are long (some over an hour).

The model list isn’t huge, but they have 116 models that are all I would think in the top 10% of models in looks. All are pros as far as I can tell.

There are 163 scenes and they update 4 times a month.

The video quality is maybe the best I have seen. It could even be overkill. The file sizes are huge. Picture sets are also downloadable and very professional.

Probably the best alternative to Pure Taboo. Even tops Pure Taboo in some ways.

Easy site to use, but they push their upsells of their other sites in ads.
Cons: They limit you to 25 downloads per week and that limit starts on day 1 of your membership. If you don’t download any scenes in your first week as a member you just lost 25 downloads. If it was 100 per month it wouldn’t be a big deal since they do only have 163 scenes, but they are limiting you to 25 per week. It’s not as bad as it sounds.

As good as the production values are there is a sameness that creeps into the scenes. They do have scenes that are part of series that do not fall into sameness. Those are produced by semi-retired model Kayden Kross.

They show you what looks like good deals on upsells, but don’t show the price until you click to upgrade.
Bottom Line: This is exactly the type of site I look for. There’s creativity, story, there’s hardcore sex, they list it as passionate sex with light kink. They mostly leave out the taboos, but if you’re a fan of Pure Taboo you will likely enjoy this site.

This site is owned by the group that owns Blacked.com, Blacked Raw, Tushy Raw, Tushy and Vixen. They are now offering a package that includes all those sites and Deeper for one price, but they don’t show the price. I think that’s worth mentioning if you’re into those sites. I have only been a member of Blacked.com and Tushy. I didn’t think those were anything special, but Deeper is like a completely different site from those. I say that because Blacked.com and Tushy were very similar to me. Deeper is just that. It adds a much deeper feeling to the scenes. I don’t think the download limit is terrible. It’s obviously set up the way it is to get you to stay as a member for more than a month and I plan on doing that. Two months should be enough to get all the scenes I want to download.

The models are really outstanding. I didn’t recognize one named Sofi Ryan, but thought that’s the kind of model I think men want to see. Emily Willis is on here too and I know she’s popular. Gianna Dior, September Reign, Adriana Chechik, just to name a few. There’s not an unattractive model on here.

The video quality could explain why they have download limits. They offer these resolutions on all 163 scenes -- 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and three mobile resolutions. The newest scenes offer those resolutions too, but have much higher bitrates and are massive files. The newest scene’s 4K resolution video is nearly 12GB, the 1080p is 6GB, the 720p is 4GB, even the 480p is 1GB. Besides higher bitrates on the newer scenes they also are long scenes. The Muse series has 3 episodes in it and is the newest 3 scenes. The 3 scenes combined are 3 hours and 20 minutes.

Just like there isn’t an unattractive model, I don’t think there is a scene I would want to skip from downloading. It feels like they took a risk with this content since it looks like the softer hardcore porn, but it’s not soft.

There are 116 models which when combined with the number of scenes tells you there are quite a few scenes with multiple models in them. That’s the touch of kink they added. I have been very happy with the content I have watched from here and think it’s one of the best sites I have been a member of. I definitely would recommend it to those into hardcore scenes, but maybe think “does it have to be that hardcore?”. They do a very good job, especially the series scenes, of being just edgy enough to be exciting, but not too hardcore to make the scenes feel uncomfortable. One of the best sites I have joined this year.

10-06-20  12:13am

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit TS Pussy Hunters

TS Pussy Hunters
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Uncommon transsexual site with all scenes about TS having sex with females.

The most accessible transsexual site with broad appeal to straight men, gay men, transsexuals, straight women and bisexuals.

A total of 326 scenes which is more than I have total from all other sites of TS with women.

Long scenes including some episodic ones that tell a story over 3 scenes.

Videos are maxed at 720p and they are as clear as most 1080p videos. Unlimited downloads on those.

Picture sets that you can also download.
Cons: Most likely is a Covid situation. Stopped updating near the end of April 2020. Before that it was averaging 2 new scenes per month.

I’m sure some people would want 1080p and maybe even 4K, but with the length of these scenes and high bitrate, I’m not for sure how practical the bigger resolutions would be.
Bottom Line: One of the first TS videos I remember watching was from a series that I think belongs to Evil Angel called, “Baby Got Balls”. It was TS with women. Not long after that it seemed the TS industry switched to focusing on a TS with another TS or a TS with a male. You can still find TS with women scenes, but they are not that common and the biggest reason I like this site so much is it’s the biggest collection of TS with women I have found.

The scenes do have high production values and most of them have at least some basic story with some of them having a full story that carries over into other scenes.

The site has 326 scenes with each including a video and photo set. The video can be streamed or downloaded and the download options are: HD, Large, Medium, Small and Mobile. The HD is 720p, the Large is 540p, the medium is 360p and the other two are below 280p. The 720p as the highest available download shouldn’t be too off-putting, the bitrate is over 5000 and they look very good in full screen on a 1080p monitor.

The scenes do bring in other niches and elements including bondage, whipping (not too violent) and most types of light BDSM. It surprises me the transsexuals are always the dominant one. I don’t know why they wouldn’t flip it in some of the scenes as I would like to see the female be the dominant one with the TS.

This site delivers to a very broad audience. Most of the transsexuals on this site do not fall in the Tgirl grouping, they are feminine looking, but most are either using hormones and converting their bodies into females (natural boobs) or are just look like a very athletic female. It is one of my favorite sites and has been since I first discovered it. I do think it will pick back up on updates as Covid slows. It seems to be one of the most popular TS sites on the internet and has a bonus to it, it comes with the Kink network. That is part of my belief about the broad audience. Men that are maybe curious about transsexuals can join Kink then check out this site without joining a solely TS site.

My score would be a little higher if I knew for sure they plan to continue this site once Covid has slowed or stopped. Their last 3 updates were of The Smut Peddlers series and showed a level of creativity rarely seen in TS porn. It would be a shame for them to stop there.

09-28-20  10:30pm

Replies (7)
Review
23
Visit Girlsway

Girlsway
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the biggest lesbian sites I have tried.

1,868 scenes with new scenes being added 3-4 times a week.

Video quality is great and continues to get better.

Picture sets are downloadable, but are small with less than 50 photos in each.

Has multiple niches within it and series or spoofs.

Solo scenes that are due to Covid-19, the girls film themselves masturbating at home.
Cons: There's not a dick to be found. At least not a flesh one, but plenty of fake ones.

Overacting, a lot of surprised faces at what's under another girl's panties.
Bottom Line: Girlsway does a very good job of splitting the sub-niches up and even have their sub-niches listed to explain them. There are:
Girls Try Anal, Mommy's Girl, Moms on Moms, Oral Experiment, Sex Tape Lesbians and True Lesbian. Besides those, they also have multiple series running at any specific time. These include Cougar Queen: A parody of Tiger King, there will multiple parts to it. Body Swap is one of their newer series that is good and has multiple parts.

My favorites are the Sex Tape Lesbian scenes. The girls play games like Dare Wheel and that leads to a sex scene. They have one that is nearly an hour long based around trying on bikinis. These scenes add enough story to make them more interesting than a lot of lesbian porn I watched. The models are very attractive. Those with the older/younger fetish they also have over 400 scenes of it with the story-driven, "Mommy's Girl" scenes. Some of the scenes are silly and playful like you would expect from a site like Team Skeet. One of the newer scenes in style has a hair stylist fixing one model's hair while the model is receiving oral from another female. They make it like the hair stylist doesn't notice at first.

They are uploading as much as anyone right now (lesbian) with an average of 3-4 times per week. The video quality on every scene has a minimum of 1080p as its highest option. There are also 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile download options. The most recent 365 scenes also have 4K downloading option. I am having a problem deciding if I like it better than Sapphic Erotica. I think I do. The amount of content is similar, but Girlsway has the added benefit of a story and some dialogue.

There also is more personality in the scenes on Girlsway. Scenes that probably make the girls genuinely laugh like 4 students touching each other while the teacher's back is turned. My second con is really the biggest one. There is a lot of overacting. Should a girl really be surprised another girl has a pussy too? The only reason I mention that is within 3 minutes the shock and surprise is replaced by the surprised one looking like an expert at giving a female oral sex. I can look over it (usually). The site is just one of the best I have reviewed. My interest in it does waver since I prefer a male in the scene. For lesbian fans I do believe this is one of the top 2-3 lesbian sites available.

09-08-20  11:06pm

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Bang.com

Bang.com
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The biggest, most overwhelming porn site I have ever joined.

132,436 scenes and they update with at least 12 scenes per day.

18,144 models, that's a small city.

Their original series scenes are quite good.

45,107 of the scenes are available in HD quality and 1,613 of the scenes are available in 4K.

Somehow this monstrosity of a site has good navigation.

No problems using the biller that others have experienced according to the comments here.
Cons: Maybe I should quit my job? This is like a mountain of porn came crashing down on my computer.

The size of this site very well could be its biggest con. I am using the category filter to at least find some content I want, but the pages and pages of scenes is just frustrating.
Bottom Line: I was looking for a site with a little bit of everything. A little bit. This site has a whole lot of everything. Some of the less popular niches I like have these totals:
395 bisexual scenes which is more than 90% of the bisexual standalone sites I have joined. They make that and my point even clearer when they show me they also have a bi-sexual category with 14 more scenes.

1,285 "shemale" scenes. What I do like about their search engine is you can click shemale, it brings up the 1,285 scenes. You can then click solo and it searches within the 1,285 shemale scenes and shows 44 of them are solo.

Niches that are usually very uncommon are common on this site. The Voyeur category brings up 1,419 scenes. They even have 1,787 compilation scenes.

While I did find a lot of scenes to download in the above specified favorite categories, it's their Original series that sets them apart for me. They have 12 of these Original series. These scenes have high production value, but it looks like they have stopped releasing many of them. It could be due to the Pandemic, but it's still disappointing.

The video quality does vary the further back you go, but most of what I have watched is at worst 480p and are decent quality. I am not as much into the technical parts. Most of my interest porn started with Vivid, bisexual scenes and males masturbating. Most of those are in 480p quality or standard definition.

The problem with the older scenes is I am thinking these are just from DVDs and a lot of them are not interesting. One of my main reasons for joining this site was the content I used to get from Tainster. This site has 36 DVDs of Party Hardcore content. These DVDs are broken into parts which was the only disappointing part about finding them here. The Party Hardcore site also breaks the performances into multiple parts which can be difficult to watch as they change camera angles from scene to scene. When combined with all the bisexual content and transsexual solo content, it makes this site a very good value for me. I just wouldn't want to be a member trying to find something without knowing what you're looking for. The navigation is handled by just clicking boxes. It works well, but the categories are often vague and unless you know exactly what to type into the search box, like "Party Hardcore", I believe you could spend a month just looking for the content you want. I don't see this as a site I will return much, but it was good for finding some specific content I was looking for.

09-08-20  10:48pm

Replies (3)
Review
25
Visit Porn Fidelity

Porn Fidelity
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Arguably my favorite hardcore site when combined with Teen Fidelity, which comes with it.

There are close to 1,000 scenes just on Porn Fidelity. It updates weekly.

High quality downloads that include up to 5K now, not that I download 5K.

Each video comes with standard pictures and even behind the scenes pictures too.

Easy navigation for a site/network of three sites.

I join it for a year at a time. They have great yearly promos about twice per year.
Cons: The download limit will be a problem for those that download a lot. You can only download 15 scenes per week. On the plus side, there are BTS videos you can still download and they have a counter on your screen that tells you how many downloads you have left.

I don’t know if this is a con or not, but I usually prefer the Teen Fidelity scenes over the Porn Fidelity scenes.
Bottom Line: Kelly and Ryan Madison own, operate and perform on the sites included with Porn Fidelity. It’s promoted as showcasing a healthy marriage. I am not one to disagree with that since I have only had an unhealthy marriage and divorce. I do think it’s funny that others have mentioned Ryan seems happier than Kelly. He gets his hot wife and his teen playtoys. What kind of marriage is that? Kelly does seem to enjoy being the voyeur. If so, that’s the steps for a healthy marriage.

It is a big part of this being my favorite hardcore site. There’s a reason to believe everything happening is for the best. No one is mad or jealous. The download limit is a sticking point for some people. I know the longtime members were not happy about it. I have all the older scenes that I wanted and being limited to 60 per month, when I have an ongoing membership, is not that limiting. I do think that’s why they put the limit in to increase yearly memberships.

They have close to the best production values considering they do not have props or niches like BDSM to turn to. It’s just raw sex. It takes a lot of talent to pull that off without redundancy. Their quality is a major pro. I download the HD videos. I don’t know why there is 5K. I didn’t like 4K when I tried it. The HD videos are sparkling clear on my monitor and look as good as any hardcore videos.

What this site does is bring in friends and women that Ryan wants to have sex with. Lucky husband? What did he do in a past life to deserve that? I do joke a lot on the comment section. Does he tell Kelly, “I want steak tonight, a baked potato and salad with a side of your hot friend for dessert”? I do believe they have a good sense of humor about all of it. It’s why their scenes are so good. I have had other members of their site post and say they’re having marriage problems. That’s not my business. I’m not American, I don’t live in other people’s lives. I talk about what I can see not what someone else says. I have all but banned myself from commenting on the scenes.

They update three times a week on Porn Fidelity and I think that’s too much. I believe they could get away with two, possibly one update per week. It does it make it feel like they’re trying to stress your download limit with three updates per week. That’s 12 per month, I only have 15 downloads per month and there’s another site that’s updating.

There’s nothing obscure or that unique on the site. They’re not pushing limits. I do believe that will be the downside of having husband and wife on the site. They’re getting older and maybe desires and wishes change. They have an interesting way of handling their pictures. You can download the standard pictures just like from any other site, but I recommend the behind the scenes pictures. Those are the only ones I’ve ever seen on a site and I prefer those. They do everything right as far as I’m concerned. Their style of porn has a built-in story and they don’t try and change it. It’s not broke. Easily in my top 5 sites.

05-11-22  07:33am

Replies (5)

Shown : 1-25 of 237 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.37 seconds.