Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Alybator (0)

Feedback:   All (248)  |   Reviews (225)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (22) Other:   Replies Received (68)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 151-175 of 237 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 151 My MILFz (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Newer site that has a lot of potential. Bills Using Epoch Includes access to live cam shows and thousands of other streaming videos as a bonus. Older women and younger men. 59 scenes currently. Updates twice per month, could be more but it's better than none. Cons: Pornusers does not have a discount There are no downloads as the site is streaming only Bottom Line: My Milfz hits on another interest of mine, which Is older and younger. In this site the tables are turned a bit towards the women being older than the guys. Being MILFs they are in my age range. Mostly the scenes use the themes of a stepmother or a horny housewife. I am neither and don’t expect to be. Still some story is better than the standard in and out sex found so often in ordinary porn. The scenes are hot enough for me, but there are just not enough of them. I can’t fault the site for lack of trying. Even during the pandemic, new videos are being added twice a month. The low number of videos and photosets,59, is because the site is fairly new and only started in 2019. In contrast, I can fault the site for being streaming only. Yes I know this is a growing trend in porn, but after my subscription is over I would want to get off on some of the better videos again. There is no discount through Porn Users, however and the biller is Epoch. They are easy to work with and cancellation is simple. If this site had no extras, I would say it needs more time to grow before it is ready to join. The extras are some of the best on any site I have ever signed up for. There is a cam site with many thousands of models that compare with those of the best and better known cam sites. They will strip to nude and put on a great sexy show faster too. Faster equals less tipping and less watching them waste time until they get more tips. If you are like me, you will love the other streaming sites that are in the niche of older /younger. You get Family Screw, Grandparents X, Granddadz, and Grandmams. They are all a bit different from your average older/younger porn and are worth checking out. There are so many other streaming videos that you get that you have to find something that you will like. I mean seriously a lot as there are over 15,000. Some of those sites that are included as streaming only here can be joined with downloads, it's a nice feature and a good way to test out other older/younger sites before spending the money on them. I would go with a score of 85 as you get so much value for your dollar. 09-28-20  09:41pm Replies (0) Review 152 Bisexuals Hardcore (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of the best collections of bisexual DVD content. Includes access to the All Gay Sites Pass and access to the All Porn Sites Pass. There are over 100 straight, gay, transsexual, bisexual sites on these two networks. Not as attractive overall as the models on Biempire, but this site would also appeal to gay men, whereas I do not know if Biempire would. A total of 175 scenes, I do not think it updates and would not expect it to start updating. These are scenes from bisexual DVDs from the 2007-2012 years. The video quality confirms that. Good job considering it’s amateur production. I believe these are European models, attractive though some of the guys are very effeminate. I believe that devalues the bisexual experience. Cons: This is probably the most common con in bisexual porn – the content is old, at least by porn and technology years. The video quality is at the very best, average. A lot of the most overused position in bisexual porn, one guy in one guy’s ass, while that guy is in the girl’s vagina. It’s not good for watching (too much movement) and it looks like everyone in it is out of rhythm. They have a few other bisexual sites on this network with minimal content. It seems like they would just put it all on this site. Bottom Line: This is a standalone site on one of the most interesting networks I have ever joined. You receive full access to the network you joined through – for me, that was All Gay Sites Pass and it includes full access to a straight network called All Sites Pass. There are over 100 sites on these networks. Most of what I can see it looks like these were all once standalone sites but stopped updating and are now all thrown together on these two networks. Bisexuals Hardcore was my main interest in joining. There are scenes on here I am familiar with, there is one Asian woman, maybe a Filipina, who is in 3 or 4 scenes and I recognize her from her excellent body and effort in the scenes. A few PU members have contacted me and asked about my interest in bisexual porn and what makes it different. I think bisexual porn is mainly marketed towards gay men and straight women. Most women like the fantasy of a threesome with two guys. This is what I like seeing in bisexual porn. At least one of the males has to be convincing as a straight male. Biempire does a good job of convincing the view both guys are straight. The woman (for female viewers) becomes the focus. Is she sexy enough, seductive enough to get the convincing straight male to do sexual things with the other male just to get a chance to have sex with her? I would think for gay male viewers, the turn-on would be believing the gay male actor was able to seduce the straight male. Bisexual porn is not going to be the highest quality porn you have ever seen. Biempire might change that in the distant future, but most bisexual porn is about sex, lust and orgasms. I do believe my cultural difference from American viewers helps me with bisexual porn. Most men from India would not admit it, but there is a trending popularity in cuckold and bisexual relationships in India. Though this site uses the overused position described in the cons they also do some more interesting positions. I think one of the most arousing positions in a male/female/female bisexual scene is the male having doggystyle sex with the female, while the other female lays under the female and licks the dick and vagina. The female receiving the doggystyle is doing a 69 with the woman under her. They do that here with a male on the bottom. The Filipina I mentioned earlier does it in all of her scenes. The two main problems here are common for bisexual sites. The video quality is hit or miss. There are 720p scenes. They are just blended in. The rest of the scenes top out at 480p. They have 5-6 video formats. I do not know why. I do not think you need a .mov, .wmv and .mp4 in 240p. It makes that part of the site (downloading) a little cluttered and even confusing. It still is a good site for those that like bisexual porn. One of the better ones, really. Nearly all scenes have at least one man who convinces me he is straight. Considering all the bonus content you receive with this site, it’s worth trying out. I once heard that about bisexual sex too! 08-12-20  12:56am Replies (0) Review 153 Private Classics (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s. Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s. The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings. Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each. Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads. Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched. Cons: I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes). No category search or tags They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update. The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them. Bottom Line: One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not. I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed. One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately. I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB. There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes. I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses? The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene. The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again. There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site. 06-17-20  05:44am Replies (0) Review 154 Cody Cummings (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very handsome, bisexual male who does solo, bisexual, heterosexual and gay scenes. A total of 314 scenes with 79 being solo, the rest are a blend of hetero, bisexual and gay. Most scenes are HD (720p or 1080p with smaller resolutions available). Very pretty girls in the scenes that feature women. It’s rare to see bisexual threesomes with two males and a pretty woman, but the ones here are. Photo sets can be downloaded. The tags can be made to just apply to the content on this site so it doesn’t bring up other sites on the network. Cons: Seems to be a recurring theme, no longer updating. The oldest scenes only have 480p download option. Not much story in the scenes, especially the bisexual ones, it seems like those would be perfect for a story. Bottom Line: Cody Cummings is one of the few male porn stars I know by name and have always found him attractive, but I don’t know if he has retired and I’ve just been watching too many tube sites or if he has moved on to other sites. I wouldn’t know if this is true, but this is the biggest solo site I have seen of a male gay/bisexual porn star. Cody is in every scene. I still think sites like this one help blur the line between what appeals to gay men and straight women. There are scenes with Cody and a woman. Scenes with Cody, another man and a woman. Cody with just a man or men and Cody by himself. Every site I have found that at least is trying to blur that line has stopped updating. Cody is a muscular, very fit guy that looks like he probably had a past in sports of some kind. One part that impresses me about his scenes is he seems to really be into all of them. Even the solo ones, which could be seen as a bad thing by some since he does seem to really embrace his own attractiveness. There are over 300 scenes, as helpful as their categories are, they don’t have one for “bisexual”. I’m going to estimate there’s maybe 30 bisexual scenes, maybe 10 hetero and around 80 solo, the rest are gay scenes, but are not always the typical gay scene. There are ones where Cody and another guy or guy masturbate together. These too are appealing to me. The video quality on this site is good with around 250 of the scenes having at least 720p or 1080p download choices. As a whole this network – Next Door Studios – in my opinion, is as good as it gets for straight females looking for sites with males masturbating and I think Cody’s site is the best of the sites on the network. 05-18-20  10:27pm Replies (3) Review 155 Old N Young (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Focus on older men with young women. In some scenes much older men. There are some realistic grandfather/granddaughter pairings. Each scene has a video and picture set, both are downloadable. One third of the scenes have up to 4K videos. Vendo is the billing processor. Videos average 30 minutes. Has 128 scenes and is currently updating once a month. Cons: Could use more updates. The site has content back to 2007, there are full years with 0 updates, and it causes inconsistency in the video quality. Same content as the site Old Goes Young Bottom Line: Old-N-Young continues my exploration of the older/younger niche. This site has some scenes that I would rank as high as any older/younger scenes I have seen. A couple of these “old” guys seem to really turn the much younger women on. Some of the other scenes are not as good and you get the idea the model is just collecting a check. The one man that looks like Santa Claus is the one they need to keep filming with. Some of the prettiest and hottest female models on the site are in scenes with him and they really are into him. There’s another man – I see no names listed for the men – with white hair and bald on top that is very sensual in the scenes, kissing, touching and these younger women don’t seem to be used to it so it’s very arousing to them. The con I noticed most was the difference in video quality. On July 15, 2017, the site updated for the first time since October 16, 2015. All videos from July 15, 2017 to current have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. On November 9, 2014, the site updated for the first time since April 18, 2009! The videos between November 9, 2014 to October 16, 2015 have 1080p, 720p, 540p and a mobile version. There are 52 scenes between November 9, 2014 and current. The other 76 scenes are from 2009 and before. These 76 scenes vary in quality. Some have 720p, some top out at 540p, but that is something I see as a con for most people. I also believe that makes only 1 update per month a con since the newer scenes have very high video quality. The action is usually good, the filming is good, it is formulaic and possibly that’s due to the age of the men? I would still recommend it for those interested in this niche. The exception to my recommendation is if you've been a member of Old Goes Young. There might be 3-4 scenes on here that it doesn't have, but everything else is the same exact content. 02-02-20  09:52am Replies (0) Review 156 1 Pass For All Sites (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: A network of 30 sites that would have scored higher if not for help from reading other PU reviews. This network has a very good, broad range of content, but it seems the content is used from other sites (Teen Mega World) and others too. It doesn't make it bad as I've not been a member on those sites. Thirty sites, 3,600 videos, 500,000 photos, 1,182 models. Was joining through the TBP link at $19.95, but when I got to the sign-up page they had a New Year's special for $9.95. Vendo is the payment processor. My main reason for joining was the older men/younger women content, they have Tricky Old Teacher, Old Goes Young, Anal Old Young, She Made Us Lesbians (older lesbian with two younger women), Daddies and Darlings, and there's just a general theme of older/younger on the network. Cons: Not for sure which sites are updating. It says the latest update was on December 27th, 2019, I assume that is for the whole network. No dates on the scenes that I've seen. Pre-checked cross sale on sign up. Bottom Line: Having not been into joining porn sites for a long time there's a lot of content that's going to sneak by me without me knowing it was on other sites. I read a few of the PU reviews that mention some of this content is available on Teen Mega World, which I've not been a member of. That makes it difficult to review since if I never join Teen Mega World, I won't know that this content was available there too and I did get this whole network for $9.95. The female models seem to be from the Eastern European (slim, small boobs, small butts) pool of models and the men are more times than not, older, some even gray-headed and look to be 2-3 times as old as the females. The old/young sites on this network average 200-300 scenes, they have a good selection of video options from 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and even 2160p. Each video also has photo downloads. There does seem to be a couple of common themes. There are cuckold sites, women using strap-ons on men (pegging) and women being in the dominant role. There are multiple older/younger sites including older men with younger women and younger men with older women. There are virgin based sites like Shabby Virgins, Spoiled Virgins and 18 year old Virgins. The Shabby Virgins one might be the most out of touch with reality site in porn. It's older women that are supposed to be virgins having sex with multiple younger men. While I do feel like this is frustrating to know this content and maybe more of it is available on other sites, the $9.95 price for nearly 4,000 scenes with excellent download options makes it a better deal for me than maybe for others that have joined the sites this content is also on. The navigation works well. You can browse by site, by model or by tags. As someone that has looked over Teen Mega World since the only scenes I would really be interested on it are the Younger/Older ones, maybe it's better this way to get all those scenes without the thousands of other scenes mixed in? I also think that's who a network like this would be aimed at. It's like they've taken specific niches from another network and made it into a more simplified network. I ended up with just over 700 scenes I downloaded so I can't really complain about that for the $9.95 price. I think others should at least look into it to see if maybe it would benefit them the way it did me. I'm pleased with the membership with just the one frustration with the thought there is more of the content I like on another site. 01-06-20  10:57pm Replies (0) Review 157 Ultimate Surrender (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: An older Kink site that adds an athletic twist to the world of lesbian porn. Nearly 1,000 scenes. The scenes are enjoyable in sections. I found myself fast-forwarding a lot, but the good parts were worth it. The site seemed to change over the years and the best scenes included a female model referee that would also get involved. Loser has to do what the winner wants (oral, strap-on). Fun mismatches that carry a sub/dom side-story to them. Multi-women team matches were the best for me. Cons: If there ever was a site that needed video scenes downloadable by part, it was this one. I found that I watched the last 20 minutes more than the first 40 minutes. I didn't really understand the scoring system. It does seem to be staged to reach the desired ending. Has not updated in over a year. Bottom Line: I was an athletic woman growing up, soccer/lacrosse/field hockey, but I never tried wrestling with other girls. That just seems like it's asking for a porn shoot to happen! I have read a lot of the other reviews on Ultimate Surrender and agree with most of the other feelings. This site had its high points (Dragon Lily's reign, Isis Love's reign, the live matches in front of crowds), but besides those you are mostly receiving a lesbian site with an athletic theme added to it. For all the corniness in porn, I can appreciate how Kink used that with this site. What person hasn't looked at a beautiful woman in a bikini with her legs spread open? Here they have no choice as the opponent has their legs spread open and won't let go. You do get the feeling there is something athletic happening. I saw a couple of scenes were a model seemed to seriously sprain her ankle and they really are sweating unlike those scenes where there is some spritzing them with a water bottle to create the sweat effect. If the site is not going to start updating again, I would really like a scene of the most prolific models on here, Dragon Lily, Isis Love and maybe one of the producers talking about how much of it was staged and maybe telling if they had matches where the women really got competitive and even angry with each other. I watched a couple where the women looked very upset with each other and their muscles were shaking from the force they were using. You have to think something like that would/could happen and it would give an interesting view of the content to go back and watch it. They have nearly 1,000 scenes, Kink's streaming player works as well as any and some scenes are worth downloading. I think the models in these scenes are maybe more important to these scenes than the majority of sites. A lot of it goes into in good taste, in bad taste. One of the injury matches had a woman that was probably 6' 200 pounds vs a woman that was 5' 110 pounds. And the heavier woman knocking the smaller one down and falling on her caused the injury. I think this niche could be expanded on and seriously improved. I have only watched the Evolved Fights scenes on Kink and they do focus on fixing some of the problems the Ultimate Surrender matches have. They also have Dragon Lily as their referee. Ultimate Surrender is a great site for what it is. Those that like women in tight or skimpy clothes, rolling around, tearing at each other's clothes, would find a lot to like here. The sex is mostly the same sex you will find on any lesbian site. It is a little rougher sex here than most lesbian sites. I would say focus on finding the Dragon Lily, Isis Love and live scenes. The scenes besides those have a more generic feel to them. A fun, different and unique site. 11-18-19  09:31pm Replies (0) Review 158 Open Life (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Archive network that has a lot of good content on it. You receive 10 sites not including the hub site, 9 of them solo models and one is a pair of sisters (Lane). It's easy to use, once in the hub or any of the sites there is a dropdown box to switch directly to one of the other sites. The site with the sisters (I don't know if they really are), does a good job of making you believe they are if they are not and that's a major taboo. While the network hasn't updated in several years, most of the videos I have downloaded have 720p and 1080p options. The photos have zip files. Cons: I think the biggest con is if you like the models. These are 10 very narrow sites that offer a lot of content of 10 models (1 male). It's not updating, but I am offsetting that with content being new to me. Bottom Line: I like anything that has a taboo feel to it. The Lane Sisters have 135 videos on here, some of them are them giving one guy a blowjob at the same time. They have threesomes, threesomes and foursomes with other women too. They look more like sisters than Britney and Whitney Stevens. That content was enough for me. The oldest scene on it has 720p and 1080p options on the videos. The other sites you receive access to are Ashley Fires, Abbey Brooks, Bree Olsen, Devon Lee, Dylan Ryder, Hannah Hilton, Manuel Ferrara, Sunny Leone and Cassandra Calogera. I downloaded some of the Ashley Fires content. They have 89 videos of her and some of her content is very good. I was more familiar with her work that must have been earlier in her career. Some of the content here shows her going into femdom. It's always interesting to me see a softcore model become a dom. The Sunny Leone site has 337 scenes with her in them. Being of Indian descent, I have always found her scenes intriguing, most are softcore. The Open Life hub site has over 240 other models, most of these are just very straightforward sex, but it is a lot of content and everything I have watched has 720p and 1080p. The content even looks exclusive, but I don't know that for sure. I still think your happiness with it will be based on if you like any of the featured models, all with 80 or more scenes each. The rest of the scenes feel like ones you could get on any DVD. The featured models have much better photo sets as well. There's an excellent one of Bree Olsen stripping in a club in Germany. It looks like this network, at one time, had a lot of potential, but I am guessing most of these featured models are now retired or just aren't shooting much content. The join process was simple, but I will say this is part of Gamma Entertainment, the same company that owns Adult Time and all the sites within it. I have joined 4 of their sites in the past and had to go through 4 attempted usernames before finding one that said it wasn't taken. They were all mine. Very few if any people have the same name as I have. The cancellation is though Fame Support and is easy. I was happy with it just from the Lane Sisters content, but the Ashley Fires dom scenes and the Sunny Leone ones made it an excellent deal. 10-22-19  01:11am Replies (1) Review 159 We Live Together (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very beautiful lesbian scenes. 800 scenes including a video, photos and screenshots Videos stream well and can be downloaded (with upgrade $15/mo) Mostly American models, tattoos, implants and piercings are common. I like tattoos and piercings, don't really care about implants. Tag system is good, but it can by iffy on accuracy. Cons: Hit or miss scenes. It seems like for every good scene there's a bad scene. Too many ads, when you sign in you are met with a full page ad, every page has multiple small ads on them. Probably 200 too many scenes. There's obviously a limit on how much you can do with "we live together" and it shows as many scenes feel like you've seen them before -- and you have. No longer updates. Bottom Line: We Live Together has a good reputation as one of the best American lesbian sites and I do think they earn it. It reminds me of when a band that keeps releasing a new album every year hoping to find their magic, but they don't realize they're out of ideas. There are 800 scenes, that's a lot for a lesbian site and at least 200 of them are excellent, I would estimate 400 of them are okay and would be dependent on if you like the models in the scene. The other 200 feel like retreads. The story of the scenes is simple. It's two or three, sometimes more than three, young, college age looking models that live together and decide since they share an apartment or home they are going to share themselves with each other. For my taste in lesbian porn there's too much pussy licking and not enough kissing, touching, fingering. It is sold as the women reacting on a whim to finally try sex with another woman. It's not really that believable that they would jump right in nose up to clit. The scenes are streaming only unless you pay the $15 upgrade fee. With an upgrade you can download up to 1080p. The tagging system could use some work. One of the tags on the We Live Together site is "cumshot". Another is "blowjob". The oldest scenes had more of an amateur feel to them and are generally better. They have a couple of women in the earlier years that were regulars. I would think that would have been the direction they would have liked this site to have. You could have shown how the progression to trying lesbian sex turned into more then you could have had something like one of the women cheating on her girlfriend with a guy. My feeling towards it might not sound as positive as it is. I just felt like the scenes were becoming stale and dull. It's a very good lesbian site. Is it possible for a porn site to pigeonhole itself too much? That's the feeling here. The models aren't the problem. Even in the newer scenes they have some really pretty models. I think it's well above average, but it's not quite into the elite area. 10-15-19  12:21am Replies (0) Review 160 Teenage Anal Sluts (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of the better sites on Analized Cute models, some that I even recognize by name. Not quite as insulting to the human nature side of me as some of these sites. I especially like the scenes with multiple young women with one guy. That makes anal sex in this form more sexual and sensual to me. 130 scenes plus two updates per month. Excellent video quality up to 4K. I do not think there are download limitations. Cons: Just like I like the scenes with 2 females and one guy, can’t say I like the 2 guys with one female scenes very much, but it is fairly balanced. The frustration with the network as a whole which I described in the Anal Violations review. Bottom Line: I get a few emails when I say things about human nature side. As much as I can appreciate the BDSM roles of dominant and submissive, in human nature, those are defined by males being generally larger, more physically stronger and by the hormones of testosterone and estrogen. There has to be a better way to show anal sex than just having the guy overpower the woman, while stomping on her and acting like he couldn’t do that, naturally. I don’t even mind rough sex/porn. Most of the porn on this network makes a mistake with me that makes it hard for me to enjoy it. They’re paying the woman. Dom and sub left the building right there. She’s going to be what you pay her to be. Why then waste the time proving it with attempts of sadism against someone you paid? Call it a cultural difference. Men in India do these things to prove their power, control and superiority over women. This site is more okay with me. It’s no less hardcore. It just doesn’t seem to be filled with oozing testosterone displays. The models on this site are quite different than most on this network. There is a younger, cuter look to the models. Most of the sites on the network have the MILF style models. The scenes look more like a couple enjoying themselves and often the young female models look like they are in more control than the male is. It makes me wonder if any porn producer of hardcore porn ever thought to try letting the female be in control? The video quality is very good with 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are 130 scenes with two updates per month. The photo sets could be a big plus if the resolution was better. I said it once before, if you have 4K videos, why are the photos only 1080p? The photos even focus on the model or models before the sex starts. Those can be downloaded in zips. I’m going to give a full closing on the network and site by saying I would recommend it if you like pretty and cute models having anal sex. I believe if the network added the sites back that it used to give with it, it would be a very good network. As it is, I paid $30 total to get the sites I expected with Analized. There are a couple sites not listed that I liked quite a bit, Anal Amateur which has around 40 scenes and Lesbian Anal Sluts which has around 30 scenes. I liked both of those better than the listed sites. It’s an okay network as long as you know what you’re getting with a membership. 02-05-22  11:26am Replies (0) Review 161 Lets Go Bi (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: Bisexual men with a woman. It’s a niche that I like, but I do have believability problems with it. Similar to believability problems with solo women sites. There are 50 scenes. They update two times per month. Video quality is very good, it goes up to 4K. The site is easy to use and has 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. Some of the female models are very attractive. That goes into the believability for me. Cons: You’re pushing my reality button when you put two young, handsome guys with a woman who is barely attractive. If the bisexual part was not included, how attractive the woman is wouldn’t matter as much. Some of this doesn’t make sense to me. There are guys wearing strapons. I know about men using bigger dildos as covers over their dick to please the wife more, but that is just different to me. They have a few scenes that bring voyeurism in for the woman. I think that helps, but it’s only a few scenes that do that. Bottom Line: I really didn’t know how I felt about this site. I like bisexual men sites. I have mental blocks that I have to get through. I will explain that. There is a porn series where a very beautiful woman is being pursued by a man. He finally reaches her, and she has a boyfriend. She tells him, if you want to fuck me, you have to fuck him (her boyfriend). I have heard of that being more common than we realize. I have to use that as a way for me to believe the two guys are not gay, but they are willing to go bisexual to get the beautiful woman. Some of the women on this site are the least attractive of the three. Which makes me think it is two gay men that are willing to add an unattractive women for pay. The site is not real big at 50 scenes. It is updating twice per month. I mentioned the voyeur possibility with a site like this one. One of the scenes has a pretty, young woman in a spa tub watching her boyfriend and another man give each other oral sex in the sauna. That is another way the bisexual men scenes work for me. I still do not understand the one with the guy wearing a strapon. To make that one more confusing, the really pretty woman also has a strapon. The one position that I like least in bisexual men porn is also one I don’t like in 2 transsexuals with a woman. That is one guy up the other guy’s butt while the other guy is in the woman’s pussy. That’s too much movement. It makes me motion sick trying to watch that. This site has some scenes I do like. There is one where one of the guys looks very young and he is topping the other guy. He is looking at the nude woman like he has never seen a nude woman. That could be another way to make me believe these men pass up the beautiful woman to slide in a hairy ass. The settings of these scenes are very nice. There are rolling hills, outdoors scenes. There are hotel bathrooms and maybe that is used to add some spontaneity. I think that would usually be the case. It just happened, we got lost in the moment. The scenes could be longer. This is one that really need subtitles. Some are speaking English, but it’s not the best English I have heard. Mine isn’t either. I know that subtitles would help a lot. This is the struggle I have with bisexual men porn. Most of the guys in the scenes give me the feeling they are gay men. That is me being complicated. Or complicating the scene. The site is good and if you don’t complicate like I do, it’s even better. I do believe I would like it more if the females were younger. The scenes with younger females on the site are my favorites. It’s another step in the right direction. There is room for improvement in the way the scenes are produced, casted and directed. 01-12-22  08:27am Replies (0) Review 162 Mature Fucks Teen (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Comes with Smut Puppet network Can download High Definition content, but not 4K Uses tags to find what you like Most cumshots on her face or in her mouth Many very classy distinguished looking gentlemen Cons: No longer updating and only 64 scenes In some videos the age differences are not that much The scene descriptions sound like poorly worded women’s erotic stories Bottom Line: I like older men and younger women together and it is one of my favorite fantasies. When I was younger I started to see older men as more mature and less selfish versions of what men should be. For me a classy distinguished gentleman is very attractive. Older men appreciate younger women, sometimes they are even grateful to us for sex. In a way that makes me think men my own age are not as attractive. I have joined and also have reviewed other sites of this type. This one is offered as part of a Smut Puppet membership. Of course that means you get a lot more than just this one site. So how does this site compare to older younger ones I have joined before? In all fairness it is not the best and it is not the worst either. Some of the men are close in age to the women and that kind of decreases the appeal to my imagination in my opinion. The site states the women are half his age. I can only say sometimes, or at least the difference is not worth getting all excited over. Of course there also are many of the older guys who are the age of those I want on a site of this type. Give me some graying facial hair or a balding man and a bit of a paunchy belly and the fantasy begins. The women are pretty, but as is so common on a site like this, they are mid twenties, where I would hope for barely legal teens with fresh faces. At that age most women are naïve sexually and a teacher can help so much to get them to blossom sexually. However, I do like watching them in action. At least the cum shots are interestingly visually. Mostly they are facial or in her mouth, which for me is reasonably hot. I don’t like internals, and did not find any here. The sex itself includes oral, vaginal and that rarity in older/younger-anal. Nothing disrespectful, rough or over the top hardcore, just enough to show that the performers have some level of chemistry. The video quality varies from High Definition to remastered Standard definition. The difference is noticeable, but the statistics and file sizes are not really helpful in figuring out which are which. The site is not hard to figure out so it is easy to use and downloads were fast enough. For me the fact that new videos are not being added and that there are only 64 are negatives. What you do get is enjoyable and worth joining of you like this type of porn. 09-07-21  05:01pm Replies (0) Review 163 Cuckold Sessions (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Cuckolding with a little variety. Averaging just a little more than 1 update per month. 277 scenes with video and photo downloads. Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre. 265 female models on this site. Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network. Uses Epoch as the biller. At least some story and changes from scene to scene. Cons: Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p 4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene I would rate the believability of these “cuckold” scenes at 1-3 on a 10 scale. Bottom Line: I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes. Being from India -- Cuckolding seems to be a much more common reality than in the United States. The basics of cuckolding is the wife or girlfriend is so sexually dominant and in control of her man, she demands he lets her have sex with other men while he watches. It also -- much smaller percentage -- can be about the husband or boyfriend having a fetish for watching his wife or girlfriend be with other men. That’s why the believability factor is not very high on these scenes. It also gives the scenes one of their pros too. The cuckold is in various roles from scene to scene. Some of the cuckolds work the video camera, some just watch with enthusiasm and others are tied up in some form of bondage and made to watch. Most of the cuckolds look like either other porn actors or producers. Maybe even the regular cameraman becomes the “cuckold”? I still am giving them points for at least giving us scenes that vary. An interesting part about this niche is reading the comments left by members. I believe those comments hurt the scenes since it’s clear many of those making the comments are cucks. There are many comments that ask why the cuck doesn’t “eat the creampie”, others that say the male actors should “piss on the cucks face” and others that believe the cuck should join in by acting as the “fluffer” for the male models. The majority of these scenes do include 720p and 1080p video downloads as well as photo downloads. I do believe 277 scenes is a lot for this niche, but I don’t generally join cuckolding sites so I could be wrong. It’s another good, not great site on this network and I would think those into cuckolding -- and can suspend their disbelief in the believability of it, would really enjoy these scenes. They are better acted than most of the scenes I’ve watched on this network. 02-26-21  05:54am Replies (0) Review 164 Fuck Studies (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The never gets old tutor teaches the student a few new things, niche. Some of the scenes do a good job of depicting an older, dominant tutor with the submissive student. There are 234 scenes with 1 new one added each month. The female models are cute/pretty, the males are just okay. Something I usually don’t notice, but this site has very good camerawork. Photo sets are downloadable and videos are as well with no limitations. Cons: When I said the guys are just okay, it’s mostly because they are using either gray hair color or wigs to make the guys look older. No subtitles and no way for me to know what they’re saying. I guess they’re not studying English. Bottom Line: This niche is almost always a popular one for me. I prefer the older man with younger woman scenes and this niche is made for that setup. Except when you see a male who looks like a 24 year old athlete with solid gray hair. Maybe it’s an older man that just looks a lot younger than he is. I do think they missed a good opportunity with this site. The scenes that involve any lesbian parts are threesomes with 2 female students and a male tutor. It seems like someone would have thought about making a female the tutor with a younger female student. The site is good sized for this niche. The 234 scenes come with download options from 540p to 4K. The newer scenes only have the 4K option. The downloads are unlimited and also include a downloadable photo set. The obvious problem is there is very little English. The problem I noticed more once watching the scenes is there are scenes where the tutor is already at the girl’s house and she’s in her underwear to start the scene. One of the threesome ones, the tutor is sitting between the two girls when the scene starts and both girls are touching him. Maybe they have been having sex for months, and that’s where the dialogue is missed. Tutors don’t just pop up on living room couches with boners. I do like some of the scenes, but also find myself streaming them before downloading. This niche for me has a lot of potential, but the parts I listed above are how you lower the potential. They’re not even studying in most of the scenes. They are watching television. I would expect more spanking, more shows of dominance and submissiveness. And if the girl is going to make the first move how about a little seduction? In the couch threesome the one girl just slaps her hand on the guy’s dick. I still believe the site is okay. Most of the girls are cute. The guys are really just okay. They have a few scenes that have what looks like a real older man not one they have made look older. Those are the best scenes for me. I would like to see sites like this one worry more about the production values than making 4K videos. It just seems like there is a lot of wasted potential. I would even prefer having English subtitles instead of 4K. If you have the time to go through and find scenes you know you will like it’s an okay join. 09-28-20  10:09pm Replies (0) Review 165 X Angels (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Hardcore site that features pretty, young female models. Premium quality on videos with up to 4K on newer videos, picture sets have zips Unlimited downloads on videos and picture zips. 174 scenes with 2-3 updates per month. Good price for everything you get. Cons: I don’t know why this word came to my mind while watching these scenes -- benign. No emotion, no dialogue, no stories. Some of the most formulaic scenes I have seen. Bottom Line: The girls on this site are very pretty, thin to average build and have very little personality. The word benign comes to mind as I see this as non-offensive porn. I don’t think porn needs to be offensive, but this is the type of porn that you would expect either a very young person to like (just because the models are naked) or possibly an older person who hasn’t been exposed to much porn. I was expecting more and maybe 10 years ago a site like this would have been a breath of fresh air. Instead, it is hanging by a thread for its life just based on the looks of the models. The site isn’t a decent sized site with 174 scenes with a video and photo set for each scene. The update schedule is only okay with 2-3 updates per month. The videos are not very long. I haven’t seen one yet that is longer than 25 minutes and all are at least 20 minutes. That doesn’t help with the feeling that these scenes are formulaic. When you watch four scenes and they are 21-23 minutes with the same order of positions you start to feel like what’s the point? They do try to add other elements to the scenes. One scene is supposed to be a married man having sex with his stepdaughter in the same bed her nude mom is asleep in. Some try to incorporate forms of very light and tame bondage. It doesn’t change the formula. You could potentially say there’s some humor in the scenes. The one with the stepdad and stepdaughter having sex in the same bed as the girl’s nude mom shows the stepdad shushing the stepdaughter, but doing nothing about the bed squeaking and moving. I think when you start noticing things like that it just shows the porn itself is not keeping your attention. I can see how and why men would be into this. The models look very young (18-22), they have nice bodies, pretty faces and most of them are even flexible. This is one of those sites that feels like it was made for men to watch. I can’t complain about the quality, nearly half of the videos have 4K, the rest have 1080p as the top option. They also offer 720p and 480p. The photo sets could be better. They are smaller in size than most sites of this type with most of the photos just being screen captures. All and all, I couldn’t recommend it by itself, but it does include a full network with it that makes it a good value for your money, especially at the low price it is offered at. 09-28-20  10:00pm Replies (0) Review 166 Home Toy Teens (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: Fresh and very pretty young teen models that I have never seen before. The videos are a lot of fun to watch I love to see real orgasms and masturbation Vendo is the biller and I have had good experiences using them There is a photo set for each video. Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites. Cons: Archive site that last updated in 2009 Only 73 videos. Not all are even HD 1280x720 There is no PornUsers discount, but you can find one on the internet. Bottom Line: I love this site as it uses a depraved sense of humor. I love the weird and offbeat and this is the most fun site I have seen in a long time. Because the site is an archive that is no longer updating, I have to say that I wish it was still going strong. In 2020 every single woman and nearly every married one has at least one drawer full of her little “friends’. Now they need batteries and have all different speeds and types. Some vibrate and others simulate you getting your pussy licked. Ten years from now we will be able to use toys that I cannot even imagine today. This site is now eleven years old. Times were not so complex or organized then and our older sisters had to make do with whatever they could find. That is what this site shows in all its glory. They used a wide variety of dildos in all kinds of sizes and shapes. If you did not have a dildo, you had to get imaginative. These very pretty women use cucumbers, shampoo bottles, hair spray bottles, hair brushes, can openers, make up bottles, pears, blush brushes, cans of shaving cream, karaoke microphones, small statues, apple pieces, cans of hairspray, hammer handles, spray bottles, television remote controls, lint rollers, condiment bottles holding some kind of sauce, mascara tubes, glasses, knife handles, corkscrews, leeks mistakenly called an onion here, and eggplants. In one scene a nurse uses a medical baumanometer for taking blood pressure. I have a pretty good imagination, but that one made me laugh. Nearly all the scenes are vaginal but a few are anal. With only 73 videos and not all of them in even weak HD quality, I wish there were more. I feel this is very female friendly as it shows imagination and the empowerment of women sexually. When we get the urge we will do whatever is necessary. These women give us ideas and are examples of positive women role models in porn. The site should post new scenes and remaster the older videos. There is no talking in the scenes as is often the case with European porn. I found the women to be very attractive and very much setting the right mood for me. Highly recommended and I think guys would like it too. As the name says, fun begins with home toys. 09-11-20  09:45am Replies (0) Review 167 WTF Pass (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Surprisingly large and diverse network. There are 11 sites included in the network. By their count there are 2,676 scenes. Some unique and strange porn which is why I guess it's named WTF Pass. The newer scenes on the network have 720p and 1080p quality downloads. Some of this content is too strange to make up or pass up. Cons: No scenes have dates on them and there's no reason to believe any of it is updating. Strange isn't always a good thing. Feels like a cheap version of major networks takes on reality porn. Bottom Line: This was not as bad as I was expecting. I found interest in several sites and also felt like some of the sites are just blatant cheap ripoffs of bigger, mainstream sites. Below are the sites that come with the network and their number of scenes: College Fuck Parties 434 scenes, Pickup Fuck 218 scenes, Private Sex Tapes 393 scenes, Hard Fuck Girls 51 scenes, Porn Weekends 85 scenes, Dolls Porn 408 scenes, Public Sex Adventures 45 scenes, Panda Fuck 32 scenes, HD Massage Porn 167 scenes, The Art Porn 663 scenes and Meet Suck and Fuck 180 scenes. If you are like me the first one that really caught your eye was Panda Fuck. This is a site featuring a stuffed Panda Bear that I believe a man is in. The women masturbate and have "sex" with the panda's foot long dildo or cucumber. The Art Porn looks a lot like Sex Art and X-Art, it also has scenes that are named in ways to make me believe they have updated somewhat recently like, "Quarantined With Hot Girlfriend". What does impress me about the network is this looks to be all-amateur. In some ways, it reminds me of Teen Mega World or maybe Porn Pros. Some of the scenes do feel generic, but I do believe the amateur aspect helps in that regard. They have a lot of outdoor, exhibitionism, voyeurism scenes too. A few things to make note of the scene counts on some of the sites is lower than it says. College Fuck Parties which is a good site has older scenes that are split into 4-6 parts. There is a model list and it lists them having almost 800 models. My guessing that it's amateur is based on me not recognizing any of the models. It does look like the prettiest models are on their site The Art Porn. The age of the models is a lot of 18-20 year olds and I haven't seen one over 24. I do think it's an okay join especially if you like outdoor, orgies and public porn. Nothing really stands out and that's the same feeling I had about Teen Mega World. I would not be surprised if this content is related to TMW. I was debating trying it since I do like orgies. When I was signing up, I noticed a nice surprise, the price was only $8. That probably helped me make the decision to give it a try. There is definitely better porn out there, but if you're looking for something with a sense of humor and even foolishness, this network does a good job on those parts. 09-08-20  10:50pm Replies (0) Review 168 Bi Guys Fuck (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Site dedicated to bisexual sex, most of the scenes are two bisexual males and one female. It currently has 71 scenes on it. They update once a week. Simplistic site design and choices, nice and clean layout. They use Epoch as their payment processor. Small collection of tags (18) for navigation, but do seem to cover everything needed. Models of both sexes are attractive. Cons: Nearly every video starts with a 20 second ad for erection pills. The videos also end with a 2-5 minute interview with the models from the scene. Most scenes are only around 20-25 minutes total. Very little variety in the models, one guy is in almost every scene. There isn't a model list, but most of the models (male and female) and in several of the scenes. 18 of the 71 scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck, not Bi Guys Fuck, some of these are not bisexual scenes, there are also bisexual females with one male scene. These scenes all venture away from the Bi Guys Fuck theme. Bottom Line: Bisexual guys with a woman is one of my favorite niches in porn. I saw this one advertised as new on The Best Porn and happy to see it isn't owned by Mind Geek (pay for downloads), I took a chance. Once on the site, I got a nice surprise. They are currently having a 50% off sale on it. This is niche that is hard to explain the attraction to. I prefer the scenes in this niche that at some point have the woman pull away while the guys have sex and she masturbates while watching. There's a few of those here. The variety or lack of variety in models would be subjective to the viewer. One guy, looks to be Latino, handsome, very fit, is in nearly all of the scenes. He's even in the dumb advertisement they have at the beginning of most of the scenes. A ray of hope, possibly, the newest scene doesn't have the ad in it. The scenes do lack much in the way of story which I believe is a weak point of this niche. It is one of the least creative niches and that goes for multiple bisexual sites I've tried. They sit on a bed, someone tells them to start and they're off to the races. I think in my darkest fantasies of this niche, the woman would walk in and catch her boyfriend/husband maybe getting a blowjob from his best guy friend then she would get involved. It could go the other way too. Boyfriend/husband walks in and catches his wife/girlfriend giving his best friend a blowjob. These type of scenes are hard to find. TBP only listed 21 bisexual sites the last time I checked. You can find them on DVD series on various sites (Evil Angel has some) and the other option is Bi Empire that is now owned by Mind Geek. They require you to pay $15 extra to download. The only part I thought was kind of cheap was the inclusion of two bisexual females with one man. There are only four of those scenes, but when you only have 71 scenes, it looks like the 71 scenes would at least live up to the site's name. Of the other 71, the 18 Hot Guys Fuck scenes have a few that have bisexual males in them. Two are one on one male and female scenes. I would say 55 of the scenes have actual bisexual males content in them. While it is a new site in listing here some of the scenes are dated back to 2015. Each scene has the same options: 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. I wouldn't say I'm disappointed. A lot of the videos I've found in this niche are 480p quality, so they do they at least have much better quality than I'm used to. A faster update schedule would help too. It's an above-average site with high quality videos for those that are into the bisexual male scenes. 04-12-20  11:40pm Replies (2) Review 169 Ladies Fuck Gents (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her. 152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche. Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs? Includes photo sets that are downloadable. CCBill is the billing processor. Cons: The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts. Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites. Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering. Bottom Line: This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass. These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites. These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes. These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons. 02-02-20  10:10am Replies (0) Review 170 Fetish Network (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites. The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for. Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch. They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those. Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch. Cons: I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen. Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes. Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review. Bottom Line: This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all. I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth. These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high". The quality is overall very good. I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it. I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well. It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme. I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for. 10-07-19  11:10pm Replies (1) Review 171 Vivid (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of my favorite studios for DVDs Large selection of their classic scenes Around 6,000 scenes including celebrity sex tapes The search works well. There are photo sets, but they are small and rarely go with a particular video. Cons: I wasted two months of subscriptions trying to download Vivid Classic DVDs, first as an Adult Time member, now as a Vivid member. The DVDs are broken up on both sites. You have to find each part of the DVD. While they do release a new scene each day it is only part of a DVD. If you are looking for the whole DVD you have to wait until the other parts are released. Way too much emphasis on the celebrity content. The main page has two rows of celebrity sex tapes and most are 5 or more years old. NO Adult Time access with the Vivid subscription. Bottom Line: Last month I joined the Adult Time network to download Vivid DVDs. What I found was a mess Vivid scenes piled in together, out of order and with no way to group the like (DVD) scenes together. I had to search "DVD name, scene 1". The 7 related scenes would have 2 or 3 scenes from the same DVD, but many of those DVDs have 8 scenes in them. It became too frustrating to try and find them all. My Adult Time subscription ran out so I thought I would try joining through Vivid. It works the same way on the Vivid site. They do have the option to search by video, then put them in alphabetical order. This does line up a lot of the scenes in the right order and at least makes it doable. It was better than this the last time I joined (2016). It was better downloading them from Videobox's Vivid channel than this is. Before, you could select a DVD and all the scenes would show up for download. Now, you have to click through pages of alphabetical listings to put the pieces together. Why wouldn't Vivid come with Adult Time? It's one of the sites they really push on Adult Time. I am going to go through and get the ones I know Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel, then pay another $15 to add the Vivid Channel to my Videobox account just so I can easily find and download the scenes I want. After that, I do not plan to return to Vivid. There are at least some good newer series that are easy to find in the sites category. The Nasty Stepfamily, Orgy Train and Mom is a MILF are all good series that are newer. I am glad I figured out how to get the scenes to lineup in order or my score would have been much lower. I found 80 classic DVDs that Videobox doesn't have on their Vivid channel. Those make up for the one month subscription price. If you are a Vivid fan I would recommend joining through their site and using the movies, alphabetical or date filter. On Adult Time, I couldn't get the DVD scenes to line up no matter what I tried. This is story-based porn. Having each of the scenes is very important. I will give Vivid an 84, but Vivid on Adult Time is a 70 at best. 08-18-19  10:50pm Replies (0) Review 172 Anal Violation (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The site that led me to join this network all because of one scene. Please read my comment in the Bottom Line about Analized. The information is incorrect on The Best Porn and left me with a network of very little of what I expected. Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor in the scene “Slut Training”. Wasn’t as good as I expected, but it was enough to get me to join the network. High quality downloads, unless I missed one, all scenes have up to 4K. Downloadable picture sets and they’re not bad, could use a boost in resolution at on 1920x1280 Some of the scenes are pretty good, especially the ones with more than 2 people. Cons: This network is part of a network that is part of a network. Nothing I found before joining told me of the sites I was not going to have access to or told me exactly of which sites I had access to. I don’t know if they changed the way their network(s) work, but The Best Porn listing hasn’t been updated since the change. Please look into that. It's man porn. What do I mean? It’s more about the guy’s ass and balls than anything else. I don’t hate this type of porn. It just seems like such a waste to have a beautiful model only to focus on how far the man can stretch her ass open. Bottom Line: I am going to put the explanation here of the problem with Analized as a network. They also own Porn Force, Full Porn Network and James Deen. Reading The Best Porn review, it lists 14 sites that come with Analized. Those included the sites I was interested in DTF Sluts, Big Daddy POV, Your Mom Does Porn and POV Perverts. I have access to NONE of those. I have access to Anal BBC, Anal Amateurs, this site Anal Violation, Your Mom Does Anal, Teenage Anal Sluts, Her Gape and Homemade Anal Porn. That is 7 of the sites listed on The Best Porn listing. I’m not as upset as it may seem. It’s just I’m not really into anal, at least not this much and I had to join their other network to get sites that I thought came with Analized. This scene with Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor was what made me interested. Add those sites I thought I was included, and I thought I had found a really good deal. It was $10 on New Years Day. The scenes on this site are a little more creative than the previous site I reviewed from this network. There does seem to be more of a setup and story with the scenes. The woman wants to try anal. Different objects are used to prepare her. The sex is okay. It is just the focus of the camera that becomes annoying. I get that anal sex is probably difficult to record unless maybe POV. But the constant view of a hairy ass and balls flying around just doesn’t help my feeling towards porn like this. That is why the scenes with more than 2 people are the ones I like. The camera has to pick everyone up or bounce around by couple to couple and doesn’t get stuck in that one view. Maybe I am being too critical when I say anal sex is not the most camera-friendly sex. One scene on here comes to mind, the woman on her back and the guy squeezing her legs together. Good, creative positioning for the couple since squeezing the legs together causes the anus to open more. All I can see as a viewer is the woman’s legs squeezed together, about ¾ of the man’s dick and nothing else. I can’t even see the penetration. On the positive side, it has 141 scenes, acceptable photo sets and the videos can be downloaded from 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The group scenes are quite good. The scenes are even long. Some even over an hour, especially when more than 2 people. That’s my way of saying they should just do away with the one on one anal scene. If you’re going to be wild and kinky add a few more couples in there. It’s an okay site on an okay network, as long as you know which sites you’re going to receive. There are a lot of ads for their other sites. From the looks of it those sites used to come with Analized, they then split it up and didn’t tell anyone. 02-05-22  11:28am Replies (0) Review 173 Grandmams (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: This is not the older/younger I am used to. This is older women with younger men and younger women. Pretty big site for older/younger with 216 scenes. It updates weekly. This has some much older women in it. It even has one pegging a younger man while another younger man is giving her a rimjob. Very good video quality, a lot of the scenes up to 4K. The site is easy to navigate and the tags are good. Cons: I have to think some of this is not going to be attractive especially to younger men viewers. Some of these women look close to 70. Most of them don’t. The scenes are not consistently creative. A lot of them are just very standard sex. Bottom Line: My thinking when I watch older men with younger women is I don’t judge the older men’s performance. I’m impressed they can even have sex. These older women are just as active and physically capable as younger women. There are some that like I mentioned, look in the upper 60s, those are not as active. I believe some of these women are sunburn old. If you know what I mean? I don’t know that I believe these are much older women. I believe many of them are probably around 50. A woman can definitely be a grandmother at 50. I see my grandmother who is in her 80s. It’s kind of like the Milf category. The scene that really captured my attention has an older woman and she is one of the ones that looks older. She has a younger man bent over a toilet while pegging him and has another man giving her a rimjob. That’s not something you see everyday in porn. I was surprised by the number of scenes at 216 and with the weekly updates. Most of the older men with younger women sites do not update much. I always think that is because of age and inability to perform that often. The biggest complaint I have is a lot of these scenes are just too straightforward. I don’t think I would want a story with grandmother seducing grandson. The scenes that are straightforward the only difference between those and any porn scene is it’s an older woman. There is not as many group or threesomes. They do have some with younger women with the older women. I don’t like admitting this, but I do not find older women that attractive sexually. The site is not bad. It could play into fetishes, but I also haven’t heard many younger men say they fantasize about much older women. There’s always a few. I believe the older women works better with the younger women than younger men. The ones with the younger women those could be realistic enough to believe. They are teaching the younger woman. That is the bad part about my job. I know and understand human nature. The hormones and emotions. It’s hard to even fantasize that the nurturing grandmother seduces a young man. You need more story in these scenes. Just some kind of build-up to show the older woman has something happen that makes her aroused, and she justifies sex with the younger man in her head. Men do not have that problem. I am sorry if I am picking on men. But it’s true. Men say, “She bent over in front of me”. The site is fine, though. It has very good quality videos and like I said, a lot of these women are not that old. Some of them even have fit bodies. It’s a different take on older/younger for me. I really like the older man/younger woman scenes. 01-12-22  08:41am Replies (0) Review 174 Assylum.com (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: The director allows the models to act spontaneously. There are weeks of planning and discussions with the models that take place before the scene happens. BDSM forum where you can offer ideas for scenes. The site has exclusive content that is very creative. (See below) You see some of the biggest names in BDSM porn. They don’t shoot models that are not seriously into the BDSM lifestyle and they don’t work with talent agents unless they have experience representing BDSM models. There are interviews with the models, both before and after the scenes and also clips of them doing hobbies such as making pasta or working out. These models make you feel you know them. Cons: There are more models on the site besides those listed. If you want 4K there is a more expensive option. The site has been updating recently at one a month, which is average for rare specialty porn. Bottom Line: BDSM porn is about domination and submission, a power transfer between consenting adults. It is a lifestyle for serious participants who live out the fantasies. Most of what passes for BDSM in porn is not much like what those who do these things in their personal lives actually do. On this site you have an invitation to see a world that you may never witness otherwise. In contrast, this site has real male dominants who are paired with women who authentically want to submit on camera. you can see it in their eyes as well as their facial expressions. There is a lot more than rough anal sex going on here; there is crazy, demented, challenging bondage. Many scenes have humiliation, both verbal and physical, as well, giving you the feel of authenticity. Weeks before a scene is shot, the attention Is focused on making the scenes as creative and engaging as possible. The models are asked for input as to what they want to do and each scene is based on the model’s unique personality. Here you find scenes that are individually hand crafted. Most porn sites have models that you have seen on many sites before, but here the approach is different. There are many attractive models on this site, but the focus is on their performances more than their looks. If a model does well, she gets more scenes. The site says that they will interview models, but don’t want subs who are into this just for the money. A few mainstream performers are to be found here, such as Casey Calvert. In the last few years, they have worked with some superstars of BDSM porn and a few I think who are exclusive to this site. One I have seen on other sites is Rebel Rhyder, a beautiful superstar who would do well on a glam model site. You would not believe she would do these things. I swear there is no sex act or BDSM scenario that is more than she can handle and handle like the ultimate pro that she is. Included in her five scenes are a three hour gangbang that is nonstop, sadistic, anal insanity. The idea was hers and I could not believe what happened in that scene. Hint, it has four doms, two male and two female. Another big name BDSM star is Charlotte Sartre. I have seen her on a few other sites, but her fifteen scenes here are collector’s items, true BDSM classics. Her specialty is degradation and my favorite one of her scenes is Rim Jobs For All. She recites a script with praise for how much she likes to give rimjobs, all while doing, guess what? Rimjobs to two doms. As is common on BDSM sites, the models have interviews both before and after to tell you the scene was consensual fun for them. Six of the models have one minute clips of them showing their non porn hobbies. They come across as ordinary people who happen to like BDSM, so you can feel you they are relatable. These are not some strange group of perverts; they are women who cook, work out or make crafts. Some don't even wear makeup. The bondage is some of the most interesting that I have ever seen. There are many kinds of rope use, but also there are many different devices and props. Think plastic bins or masks as examples. The positions most models are in are often visually impactful and the models happily endure discomfort for long periods. The sex is mostly anal, but there is a lot of female on male rimming, ass to mouth and a lot of oral that is quite forceful. I like that the scenes are unscripted and the reactions of the models comes across as quite spontaneous. Despite the videos being extreme, the models seem to be friends who are interacting without being mean, they are just friends that have a shared interest. The same company has two other BDSM sites, Slave Mouth and Dom the Nation. I liked both of them, but this is not a network. The models who are willing to make these scenes are by definition rare, the ideas complex, the filming very intense, as well as time consuming to edit. Many scenes are well over an hour and some are so long that they are split into parts. After you join you see a link for joining each additional site at a discount. If this interests you, this is well worth a premium price. Did I forget to say they have 234 videos ? 10-28-21  07:37pm Replies (0) Review 175 Gloryhole.com (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: One of the most infamous real sexual fetishes. 670 scenes with downloadable videos and photo sets. Updates twice per month. Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre. 628 female models on this site. Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network. Uses Epoch as the biller. Cons: As much as I like the concept and find it arousing; the scenes become extremely repetitive. Similar to other sites on this network the older scenes are listed as HD, but are only 480p. Gloryhole seems like it could be used in other ways besides a woman sitting on a toilet when a random dick pops through a pre-cut hole in the wall of the stall. Bottom Line: I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes. This could depend (pro or con) on the person watching the scenes, but you’re going to get what the title of the name of the site says and little else. This site has tried variations on the Gloryhole concept. Maybe I’m not as porn-smart as I would like to think? I would add a 3-5 minute segment before the scene starts where the female is outside the public restroom with her husband or boyfriend or even really go out there by having a lesbian couple. When the woman is securely in the public restroom and this stranger’s hard dick pops through the wall in the stall, she can’t contain herself. Maybe it’s because I’m female and I just see so many of the scenes on this network as being clearly male-orientated? The variations they have tried include: Not just getting a blowjob through the Gloryhole. There is vaginal penetration in some scenes as well as anal in some. There are scenes where there are two guys, one on each side of the woman’s toilet stall. Those vary from her alternating blowjobs and handjobs between the guys to blowing one while the other has vaginal sex with her. There’s just something missing for me. This seems like an excellent opportunity to play into fantasies, to maybe even not have every scene turn into a blowjob/handjob/sex. As it is, the women are all shown as so horny they’ll suck a stranger’s dick. These models like many on this network or often MILF aged. I would like to see them get some younger female models and maybe add a touch of innocence. Like having the woman only being willing to give the stranger’s dick a handjob and letting him finger her through the Gloryhole. The amount of content and continued updates does give the site value and it is at least different (until you’ve watched 50 scenes) than regular porn to appeal to almost anyone into interracial porn. This site itself, from what I’ve seen is close to all if not all, black guys with white girls. They have another Gloryhole site that switches it around. The word Glory being in the title can’t help but make me think this is a glorified blowjob site and a glorified hardcore site. The majority of videos do include 1080p and 720p downloads and it does seem unlimited in downloads. It’s becoming routine for the sites on this network, it’s a good, not great site. The repetitiveness is easily the biggest con on this site. 02-26-21  05:46am Replies (0) Shown : 151-175 of 237 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.