Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Her husband’s site JimSlip is included.
Most, but not all, of the content is older/younger lesbian
Nylons, pantyhose and feet focus.
Lately updates at three times a month.
Currently has 253 scenes. |
| Cons: |
No PU discount.
The site layout is a bit dated. It does not look like newer sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I share a few things in common with Lara Latex. We both love scenes with nylons and pantyhose. We also love showing feet and getting attention to our feet. I would call myself a reverse foot fetishist. Neither of us are barely legal or tiny. In fact she is my same height at 5’10”. She loves her girls and I love watching girls. She has many scenes with guys too and lately she mentions she has an escorting career. I love her enthusiasm and her pure enjoyment of her sexuality. I would say she is a great role model for women who enjoy sex and are assertive about it. She has pantyhose, garter belts, girdles, seamed stockings and high heels. Lara loves to use costumes in her scenes as well. Sometimes she plays a maid or a nurse. The one that gets me is her as a schoolgirl. That stretches my imagination as she is tall, about 40ish and rather large breasted. She loves shorter women and being the older female. In fact that is played up quite a bit and makes for many hot scenes. Most of her partner women are pros and are not as much fun to watch as she herself is. I was pleasantly surprised to see Destiny DeVille paired with Lara. She is Indian, born in Bombay (Mumbai) and there have never been many in porn. In repressed India porn is illegal and women have very few rights as well. I have not seen her in many years and I think she is retired.
In her heterosexual scenes with guys, they aren’t your usual porn guys, in fact mostly they look like fans of the site who got lucky.As an extra added value her husband has his own site, Jim Slip. His scenes are older/younger and for the most part entertaining.
I was able to find a discount for this site and it helps with an older site like this one.
Although much of the site is rather old, I would recommend this if you can find the discounted price. I think 87 is a fair rating. |
|
09-28-20 09:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A glorious tribute to the always growing stepfamily niche of porn!
188 scenes with updates coming in every 3-4 days.
Pretty girls and settings that will make you believe these are barely legal girls.
Jerk Off Instruction scenes included, I believe these scenes could be the easiest way for straight women to get into watching a solo woman.
Not a lot of download options, but they do have 480p, 720p and 1080p
Navigation is good and site includes access to the Full Porn Network. |
| Cons: |
I have admitted I like perversion, but there are some of these settings that are going to push your button for, "is that going too far?"
Site is a little cluttered with 3 ads across the top and 4 across the bottom. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm going to explain the settings part since it made me laugh, but may be a little too perverse for some. Some of the scenes happen in an all-pink bedroom. There are stuffed animals, glittery curtains, all the stereotypical items you would expect to see in a little girl's bedroom. They do go out of their way to point out all their models are 18 or older and they do not condone incest. Part of the scenes are Jerk Off Instruction. I wouldn't say I have had any problems being attracted to watching young women masturbate, but for some women there is a stigma that comes with watching other women masturbate. I do think these Jerk Off Instruction scenes directed at men, can be an easy introduction to porn for women who are not used to watching it. I do believe most women had at least one moment in their life where they thought about teasing a guy and talking him step by step through how she wants him to masturbate for her. I could be wrong, but I have introduced the niche to other women and they like it too.
The other scenes are filmed from a POV orientation of the Bad Daddy. Who is supposed to be the stepdad having sex with his stepdaughter. I do think this site does this style of porn very well. Most of the stepfamily sites I have joined and even liked use humor or unbelievable stories to show you it's not real. This site doesn't. Since you don't really see the stepdad it's more about seeing the young woman looking seduced, curious and aroused by this charming older man. I like it.
They are nearing 200 scenes. These scenes each come with a small photo set you can download and the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. It's a simple site and that's not a bad thing. The biggest reason I returned to this site and network was I saw where they had a new Karma Rx scene and she's probably my favorite. I noticed rearadmiral's comment about the age of the models being too high to fit the stepdaughter role and can see that, even with Karma Rx who I believe is late 20's. I guess we just have to use a little more suspension of belief and figure the mom's a cougar with a younger husband!
The scenes while lacking the humor of a site like Family Strokes, there are times I do find myself laughing. Whether it's bad acting or really bad use of words. They do push the serious side of the site, but not as much as all their disclaimers make you expect. The site and network is worth a try. There is a lot of good content on the site and network. This site is the reason I came back. I do think it's interesting that I know more women who like the Jerk Off Instruction scenes more than the number of men that do. Recommended for those that like a little perversion in their porn. |
|
09-09-20 02:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
128
|
Teen Pies
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comical twist on creampie porn
Currently has 151 scenes including video and photos.
Very pretty models, very bad acting, it makes for a good mix here.
Cute outfits on most of the females, stockings, plenty of panty views and even knee high socks.
Bills through Epoch.
Videos have some story and are generally longer than most porn videos averaging 40-45 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
After 151 scenes of it the novelty starts to wear off. Almost all scenes are based around the premise that the guy will NOT cum inside her, so you have the shocked model face when he does.
This is a strange con for me, the outfits and silliness of some of these scenes reminds me of Scooby Doo.
Only two updates per month. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Scooby Doo con is the first time I ever thought that. It reminds me of if Shaggy was having sex with Velma and Scooby walked in. That’s not always a bad thing. The scenes are genuinely funny, sexy and won’t bother most people with the redundancy of the scenes almost all ending the same way.
The quality here is excellent. The videos all have 1080p as their top option for downloads. They have 3 smaller options as well. The photo sets are downloadable as are screencaps, but the photos are better in my opinion.
The models are very pretty and I’m sure they’re pros, but I don’t recognize a lot of them. The stories are going to require you to use your imagination. The two most common themes are older (30s, maybe 40s) man with a teen woman and he gets so excited during the sex he forgets to pull out or he pulls out at the last second. The other is the one requiring imagination as the men are supposed to be teens too and it’s supposed to be like first time sex for both the male and female with the male not being experienced enough to pull out when he cums.
It’s nothing groundbreaking, but they do give you a good, even if unbelievable, story that adds time to the scenes and gives time for teasing. |
|
01-27-20 08:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Wow Porn
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many of the women are so pretty that I can’t imagine they are real
No extra charge for downloads
Comes with three other similar sites that are still updating
About half of the scenes have a 4K option for downloads and most also have a 60fps option. Some are offered in 6K. The 6K file sizes are less than the 4K ones.
There are lots of real orgasms in the lesbian scenes.
I loved the extensive use of subtitles. We get an insight into the personalities of the many Eastern European models who don’t speak English. |
| Cons: |
The site has not updated since 2019 and there is a huge archive of well over 3800 videos and 5700 photo sets. I did not go through all of these in a month, let alone you also get much more on the other sites that are included.
This may be a plus for some members as the photo sets are very glamorous and artistic. This is not really my taste. |
| Bottom Line: |
he name of the site is a great example of truth in advertising. This porn is WOW. It is not often that the quality of a porn site has me in awe. There is almost nothing that I could ask for that this site does not already do well. The first thing I noticed is that there is a sale price that includes a second month for free. This site is large, but it is no longer updating. The value of getting a month for free is that the other three sites it comes with are still growing.
The models are mostly Eastern Europeans and I did not expect them to talk. The site found a way to get around that by having subtitles so you can see the models’ personalities come across anyway. They range from simply gorgeous to drop dead gorgeous. Without the subtitles, you would not know how playful they can be. The verbal interactions with their costars are a big part of why the scenes work so well.
The site has the usual boy/girl hardcore. As you might expect, there are as well some great solo scenes where the models masturbate or show off how sexy they can be when they get a chance to freely explore their sexual sides. For me, the scenes that I preferred by far were the many lesbian ones. The scenes with two women I felt worked best and the ones with a group seemed to me to be more directed. I like unrehearsed porn and scenes with two models seem so much more likely to happen in real life.
What you see are two women starting off slowly and affectionately. There is a lot of kissing with tongues exploring the partner’s mouth, as well as breast stimulation. The scenes that moved on to kissing the partner’s inner thighs got me anxious to see more. The interactions had a natural progression to them and moved along faster as the foreplay got more and more passionate. The site has a choice of downloads of 30 frames per second and 60. The difference is that 60 is noticeably better at scenes with a lot of movement. The hotter the sex, the more energetic, the more 60 fps is the better choice.
Another thing I liked in these scenes is that for once, us women get the benefit of POV, the action from the point of view of the receiver. Most porn has a guy getting a blow job in a POV scene, but here you get to see the energetic pussy licking or taking labia in her mouth and gently caressing them. It turns me on just to think about this. In the scenes with toys, they are not huge and some stimulate her clit as well as penetrate her. The orgasms that work best are the ones with a wand as well as pussy licking. Every scene that I have watched has orgasms that look genuine and never faked. Some are so explosive that they are truly a testament to just how well porn can be made.
There are no scene descriptions and that leads me to a minor con. There are no trailers either. Between the tags and the categories, you get a feel for what to expect. Where I would have expected a few screenshots taken from the videos, you can download just selected scenes from a page with the options of 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. Maybe you want just the cumshot in a boy girl scene as an example. Maybe the deep tongue kissing in a lesbian scene is one you may want to watch in a loop after you have downloaded it.
Many of the scenes have an option of 4K and that is not too shabby for a site that has not updated in over two years. I saw that some scenes are being recoded so that 6K is an option. Because they use HEVC (High Efficiency Video Codec), the scenes that are 6K have smaller file sizes than the 4K. Those 6K scenes work with VLC player if you don’t have a 5K or higher monitor. What I also like about VLC is that you can make your own screenshots. For me, I am sticking with 1080p as an option as I don’t have a monitor large enough to see the difference. However, I appreciate that the site offers state of the art quality if you ae looking for it. |
|
03-20-22 10:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Alison Tyler VIP
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice size archive with 121 videos and 115 photosets
Part of 71 site Puba Network
No download limits
Nearly all videos can be downloaded in Full High Definition
It is easy to search
Fast downloads |
| Cons: |
There are no dates on the videos
Alison Tyler has no fan interactions of any kind on the site. There is a link to her Twitter account. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am not a fan of many pornstars, but Alison Tyler is amazing. I am a tall woman and she is taller than I am at nearly six feet. She is larger than nearly all her costars, both male and female. I would describe her as a sexy voluptuous woman who is very physically fit despite being about 170 pounds. She has a great body at 44D-25-35. The standard pornstar is much smaller, even petite,and quite a bit younger. She breaks the mold both with her larger size as well as her voracious sexuality onscreen.
When I was a college student I played sports. Alison rode horses in rodeos, played both college level volleyball and rowed on the crew team. Even now, years later, she goes to the gym seven days a week and is a certified personal trainer. She is a writer of more than 20 sexually explicit novels and hundreds of erotic short stories. Besides that she has a porn career with 300 films and scenes. In 2016, she was nominated for an AVN Award for Best Three Way Sex Scene between a boy/boy/girl. She also has many other industry nominations ranging from sexiest adult star, best boobs, to best porn star website in 2017 for this site. I agree that this site is worthy of an award.
I think her strongest scenes are the lesbian ones. In real life she lost her virginity with another woman before she had sex with a man. Many of her scenes are her solo, showing off her body as well as masturbating. Only a relatively few scenes are her with a guy. All of her scenes are fairly hot and are eye catching. Her many fans will not be disappointed.
The site has 121 videos and 115 photosets, which makes it good sized for a single model site. The review by Rabbits Reviews three years ago has nearly the same count, so I am not confident it is still adding content. Searching is by an easy to use tag system. Nearly all the videos are available in High Definition and the downloads were fast. As part of the 71 site Puba Network, this is worth joining. Of all the sites available there, I found this to be the best. |
|
09-07-21 04:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One really great site (Mano Job) and two okay sites.
The network’s navigation is not conducive for counting models. It’s also not easy to count all the scenes. I am getting these numbers: Mano Job has 771 scenes, The Dick Suckers has 192 scenes and Mr. POV has 275 scenes.
The model list works well, where each model is listed with all of her scenes across the 3 sites. It just doesn’t have a way to view all the scenes together across the 3 sites. You have to filter down to the specific site or specific model.
This will be mentioned in the cons too. Most of the scenes I have watched or downloaded have 1080p and there is a filter for 1080p, but as other reviewers have noted there is recycling and when you use the 1080p filter, it gives you results across all 3 sites. This may be the most difficult site to review.
The scenes are enjoyable if you’re into handjobs and pretty and cute models teasing a man, sometimes adding a blowjob and sometimes more. |
| Cons: |
The navigation is getting a lot of mentions. It works well as long as you are trying to find what they want you to find. The tags give you results from all 3 sites. But you can’t view all the scenes from all 3 sites without using the tags.
No dates on updates and based on numbers from previous reviews there’s not only less scenes, there are some new 4K scenes added, which means they have removed even more scenes to recycle.
Finding any kind of consistency. There’s just not any. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been recommended to me by multiple PU members. I did not list this in pros, but I was able to also sign into the site No Way Am I Gay and there are a couple of other sites listed under their company’s name that you can also sign into, Chelci Fox is one too. I am not including those in this review. The Finishes the Job site shows 3 sites and those other sites look like they haven’t been updated in at least a decade even though I do like the No Way Am I Gay site. It is solo men masturbating which is my favorite niche, the video quality is just very poor.
Mano Job is the site I was told to try. It is a handjob site and the female models are mostly attractive. I do think some of them were or are well-known. What makes this handjob stand out is it has tags. Are you picking up on what I’m saying? Most handjob sites only have handjobs and wouldn’t need tags. This site adds butt teases, pussy teases, tit fucking (how they list it), jerk off encouragement which I continue to say is as arousing to women as men. They have taken the handjob genre another step and I do like that. There are even parts where the pussy tease slips and becomes vaginal sex for just a few seconds. The number of scenes is where it’s hard to complain, but also is disappointing. The last review by KayTBuffs listed the Mano Job scenes at close to 900. There are now 771 and according to the site’s page you open to it’s being updated daily. Older reviews even listed higher numbers of scenes. They do have 4K scenes, which do look new or newer, but in this case -- that just means there are even more removed scenes. It still does have over 750 scenes with downloadable videos and photos, making it a very large hand job site. The scenes are at least more than just a handjob too.
The site Mr. POV is okay. It’s a decent sized site and if you like POV-style porn you will probably like this site. I don’t see a big appealing factor in it unless the thinking is it’s for those who get tired of the handjobs. These scenes are hardcore sex scenes.
The Dick Suckers is the smallest of the sites and it’s a lot like Mano Jobs except it’s blowjobs instead of handjobs and there’s very little tease. The models are often on all three sites, especially the popular ones I recognize by name.
This takes us to the biggest problem. It’s a network with no way to see all the scenes in one place. It’s more like a hub page that you select a specific site from. It adds a new twist by offering tags. The tags show content from all three sites. If you select the “cumshot” tag, you will get scenes from all three sites. It seems like this is one of those “networks” where less is more maybe applies. If I select the 1080p tag, it gives me all the scenes from all 3 sites that have 1080p downloads. What if I just want the 1080p scenes from Mano Job? This does make it more noticeable that they are recycling. I tried using the 1080p tag. The results delivered rows of videos from all 3 sites. I then filtered to Mano Job with the 1080p filter set. It opened the results, but the 9th video doesn’t have 1080p. It only lets you use one filter at a time and it shows the recycling. The 4K filter shows a good amount of 4K videos with a total of 169 scenes with 4K downloads -- across the 3 sites, but if you filter to any of those sites, those 4K videos do not show up as the newest updates. There are even scenes with 720p maximum download resolution showing up as newer.
I am being fair with the score on a subjective basis. I am only really interested in the Mano Job content and it was my first time trying the site. Recycling is annoying, but I don’t think it applies on your first subscription. I do believe if you have been a member before you may not be as pleased with it as I am. |
|
08-09-21 03:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
White Ghetto
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very varied hardcore network with 4,512 scenes
Video quality is very good on 75% of the videos.
They cater to all sexual orientations: lesbian, transsexuals, bisexuals and heterosexuals.
The site is easy and simple to use.
There is the feeling there’s something for everyone here, also very good blend of races and ethnicities. |
| Cons: |
Looks like it stopped updating last year, but it does have 4,512 scenes on it.
No 4K that I have seen, but a large amount of the scenes have 1080p.
With this much variety you’re going to see something you probably don’t want to see like a 63 year old woman being gangbanged. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those networks that escaped me. Or maybe I escaped it? I love seeing varying content, risky content, and anything that just goes away from the status quo, but there are cons to this like the last con I listed. If you’re not sure what to expect from this network, I’m going to list some of the recent names of the DVDs these scenes are from. I do assume these are from DVDs. The scenes have a name and scene number. We will start with “Trans Brats”, then move on to “I Heart 10 Inch White Boys”. Should that be white cocks or white dicks? The woman loves a 10 inch tall man? Then there’s, “Trans Women Reform School”, “Going Bareback for Tgirls”, “Dreaming of a Trans Monster Cock” which progresses to “Cum Taste My Tgirl Monster Cock”. I then found, “Supermodel Sluts” and “I had Sex with a Black Man”. The always needed, “40 Year Old Size Queens”. Just when I thought we were back to normal porn there’s, “Cuckold Diaries” and I’m sorry for laughing, “White Kong Dong”. As varied as this is, they just couldn’t stop there and delivered “Grandmas who Love to Fuck” and took the overused, but still enjoyable stepfamily porn to all new levels with, “My Stepmom’s Cock”. They even have a DVD series called, “Bushy Beavers”. All of those are just on the first page of what is a 76 page site.
That, to me, is the selling point of this site. If you’re just burnt out on the same type of repetitive porn scene, I can almost guarantee you that’s not going to be a problem on this site, but you will have to be open-minded enough to see grandmas who love to fuck and find out about someone’s stepmom having a cock.
The impressiveness of the variety is easily shown. They have 513 lesbian scenes and some of those are really good. They have 909 transsexual scenes and 3,255 straight scenes. Those straight scenes include anal, threesomes, gangbangs and really every niche you can name.
I don’t know that I would expect high video quality considering these are sourced from DVDs, but at least 75% of the scenes have 140p up to 1080p download options on them. The scenes do have photos and they are downloadable, but some of the sets only have 10 or less photos in them. It is difficult to pin down a certain genre or what to expect. Unless I just say, “hardcore sex”. That does seem to be the theme in nearly every scene. There are some solo transsexual scenes which I was very happy to see.
The site considering how varied, is really easy to use and makes good use of the lesbian, transsexual, straight tags/settings. I have noticed there’s not much story to the scenes even though they are part of DVDs. I thought that could be a reason for the scenes to have a continuing story from scene to scene, but I guess that’s just Vivid that does that. I don’t know how easy or likely it is for me to recommend this site. It’s definitely different in the type of content, but the scenes mostly feel rushed and with no story it defeats the purpose of naming and numbering the scenes. It is worth checking out if you like a very broad mix of niches. |
|
08-09-21 03:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Granddadz
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Older men with much younger women.
Some of the females are very pretty. I think that’s not as common in this niche.
283 scenes including a video and photo set.
Newer downloadable scenes have 4K video.
Updates had stopped from May 2020 - August 2020, but a new update arrived on August 30th, 2020 and 3 more new scenes came in September.
Better performances than I expected from the old guys.
Pictures are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
Lack of story with the scenes.
The search features are limited to using tags. Some of the tags are overused or overlapping which means I could be missing out on other scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest surprise with this site is the quality of the female models. I do not know any of these models by name, but thought Freya Dee, Adelle Sabelle, Sher Vine and Ava Black are all very pretty and gave excellent performances in their scenes. Two of those newest four scenes feature Freya Dee. She should be a star if she isn’t already.
I usually don’t have a big problem with search features, but I will mention the overused and overlapping tags. It’s common for scenes to have these three tags:
Old Guy, Old vs Young and Young Old. My problem there is all of these scenes are supposed to be older men with younger women. The tags could be more spread out. Just like having: Handjob and Masturbation. With the scenes only having 8-10 tags and up to 5 of them being the same or similar to the other tags it lightens your ability to search. Besides the tags they have a box to type in.
While there are 283 scenes, I am estimating that 80 of those are called bonus scenes. Those 80 are stream-only. All of those 80ish are not old and young. These are mixed in with the downloadable scenes.
The newer scenes offer 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The photo sets are also downloadable. The oldest scenes offer 540p, 720p and 1080p downloads so there’s not a big dropoff in quality even in the oldest ones.
I wouldn’t complain about the missing story with each scene, but the description of each scene doesn’t even help. Why is that incredibly hot early 20s young woman in the bed with a man old enough to be her grandfather? That’s all I need is one short description.
The updates stopped for 4 months, but they have updated 4 times over the last month. This is one of the larger collections I have seen of older men with young women and even though there isn’t any story some of these scenes are very good.
You also receive access to a large stream-only portal that has over 10,000 scenes. You can check out their other old/young sites there and watch the scenes to see if their other sites are worth joining. I like it well enough to recommend it to those who enjoy the older man/younger woman niche, especially if you like an age difference that looks to be as high as 40-50 years difference in some of the scenes. |
|
10-06-20 12:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
21 Naturals
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-natural female models with an emphasis on male/female sex.
Some of these models are knockouts! Mia Split, Romy Indy, Alyssa Reece are all worth looking deeper into their careers in porn.
Watching the guys try to have gentle to moderately paced sex with these beautiful women.
They are updating once per week. There are 988 scenes to choose from.
The video quality is high and the pictures are excellent quality, both are downloadable.
It’s easy to get around on the site, there are no ads and they have broken the scenes into pages so you don’t have to scroll forever. |
| Cons: |
It’s romantic. I can’t believe I listed that as a con either. Everything looks so nice, the bedding, the curtains, and there’s nothing close to rough.
The scenes are repetitive and heavily scripted. Nearly every scene is right in the 25 minute area.
No more than 2 people in any scene! It’s porn! There has to be another guy around somewhere? |
| Bottom Line: |
This site gets my attention with their all-natural models. I reviewed a site with mostly tattooed models not too long ago and questioned if tattooed people only have rough sex. This is the other side of it. Tell me it’s not true. These all-natural models do have rough sex sometimes, right? It feels like a social experiment or really bad job of stereotyping. I do like this site and really, I like it better than I expected to. I like Kink and a little edginess with my porn. There’s not much of either on this site. Mia Split may add a different twist to the site with her flexibility. She looks like the one that needs to be doing rough hardcore. If your body bends that much use it. I named off the other two too, Romy Indy and Alyssa Reece, they remind me of women I know. Which is the biggest selling point here. These women look like your next door neighbors. Maybe your next door neighbor’s daughters! I’m going to make it kinky eventually.
I did not list it as a con, but there is no story and very little dialogue. Maybe it’s just my newness to European porn, but shouldn’t this niche of porn have a story? Why are they making soft, passionate love? Was it a lucky Tinder find or did they just happen to walk into a house and decide to have sex? I do see it as a con, but the female models save it. The pairings with the males is also very good. You won’t see any foot-long dicks trying to squeeze into an 18 year old model. I wonder if they even paired these couples together for physical compatibility? I got that feeling in the Romy Indy scenes. There isn’t a long, 3-5 minute section in the videos of the woman trying to get the dick all the way in her. There is more focus on the man and woman being in tune with each other’s movements. That saves the site for me.
There are 988 scenes. With once a week updates they will be to 1,000 around the time my subscription runs out. The download options for videos includes all 988 videos having 1080p. I will mention the older scenes have 1080p, but not 720p, they jump from 540p to 1080p. The newer scenes have all the options from 4K down to two mobile versions, those also have 1080p and 720p, 540p, 480p and 360p.
I used to didn’t pay much attention to pictures, but have learned these more artsy sites have some really great pictures. The photo sets have around 80-100 photos in them. The resolution is 5800x3700 on the high-res download zips and there is a smaller resolution available too.
I may need to bury my head in the sand for saying I really like this site. I am sure I will want something rougher and kinkier to watch, but this is the best I have seen in the romantic style of hardcore. Can I get a vote for Romcore? I would recommend it to those into this style. I like it better than Sex Art and X-Art. |
|
09-28-20 10:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Beauty 4K
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Sexy hardcore action with very pretty girls.
102 scenes with a new scene added every month.
As the name suggests, the video quality goes up to 4K on all scenes.
Each scene comes with a downloadable photo set.
Videos are downloadable and there are no limits.
Epoch is the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are a little on the plain or vanilla side.
The guys in the scenes are annoying.
Too much camera love from the models that seem more interested in looking at the camera than having sex. That may be a personal one. These girls are very pretty and they know it. They stare at the camera. |
| Bottom Line: |
You have two major selling points with this site. The models look young (18-22), they are very pretty and the video quality is exceptional. The sex isn’t bad. The models just seem like they would be better off in solo videos. In one scene, the very pretty model is in a cowgirl position. The cameraman is filming from behind to show her very nice butt and she’s turning her around looking at the camera. I do think that is a weakness I see in a lot of hardcore scenes. She would probably be an incredible solo model with all that eye contact with the camera.
One model is getting her toes sucked and is looking at the camera on the other side of the room. There has to be a better show of connection between the male and female for me to really enjoy hardcore scenes.
The site isn’t huge with only 102 scenes and it’s not going to become huge with only one update per month. They have another 8 years before they reach 200 scenes. I don’t think it’s a Covid-19 problem either. It looks like they have released an average of 1 scene per month since 2018. There are a few months with two updates, but there also are a few months with no new scenes.
The scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. The videos have these download options: 404p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have 4K even on the oldest scenes from 2015.
The scenes have very little story or dialogue, but they do try to work some fetishes and different niches in. There is a massage scene, some foot fetish, young and old, they’re at least trying to give the viewer something to work with. I listed plain/vanilla in the cons. What I mean by that is the scenes are very similar from scene to scene even if they work a fetish in or a different niche.
The feeling I get from this content is they know the models are very pretty and the video quality is high quality so that’s enough. It’s not enough. The dorkiness of the guys trying to get themselves on camera too is annoying. The acting itself is acting. The girls jump back and act surprised to see a dick. The guys are just jumping in front of the camera. I see the models as ideal solo models since they wouldn’t see a dick to be surprised by and they wouldn’t have a guy hogging the camera lens. It just isn’t the type of hardcore porn I like. It could be for others since you do have the two big selling points to think about. |
|
09-28-20 09:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Maybe the most diverse content on this network.
It is the biggest site on the network with 687 scenes.
The scenes have a video and picture set with newer ones having 4K (see cons).
Not all scenes are as formulaic as most of the sites on this network are.
Simple navigation system is usable, uncluttered and works well.
Pretty girls especially in the older scenes. |
| Cons: |
Only one-fourth of the scenes even have 1080p. The scenes from 2013 and back have 720p as the highest download option and some of the even older scenes top out even lower with 576p being the largest download option.
It looks like this site was once the network’s top site. It is now only updating once per month and while there are still days left in September 2020, there hasn’t been an update this month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is frustrating for all the right reasons. At one time, it was updating daily and the scenes didn’t stick to a formula. There is some anal mixed in, rimming, lesbian, group, threesomes, it’s like when they moved to naming their sites after a specific niche they developed the formulas for each niche or a template even and limited their creativity.
Which is why this site is frustrating. The older scenes are very good, but the video quality is a large drop-off from the newer scenes. It really isn’t a huge deal to me, but it probably would be to others. I can watch 480p if the action is good enough. I think the size of the site shows how much they were once putting into the content on it. They have 687 total scenes, but only 45 of those scenes were released over the last 5 years.
There still isn’t much story or reason for the sex other than filming a porn, but there is more emotion and slight kinkiness in the older scenes. It feels like the site has been presented 3 different ways. From 2016-2020 it is mostly plain, little emotion porn and only 10 updates per year. From 2010-2016 there was moderate emotion in the scenes and they released around 22-24 updates per year. From 2006-2010, there was high emotion and they released around 90 updates per year. I would guess somewhere around 2010 is when they started separating their content into niches and that’s when they lost some of the creativity and diversity the 2006-2010 years showcased. Those time spans also go from 2016-2020 (very high video quality), 2010-2016 (good video quality) and 2006-2010 (standard video quality at best).
I know it’s a big if, but if you don’t mind the lower quality video this site’s older content is the best content -- in my opinion -- on the entire network. The action is good and varied, the models are cuter or prettier, there are threesomes including two guys with one girl. There are group scenes with as many as four people in them and there are lesbian scenes too. It seems like a lesson in if it’s not broke don’t fix it, but they fixed it and broke it. |
|
09-28-20 09:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Blow Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5 site network with 80% of it being blowjobs.
Very large network with over 5,500 scenes and they are updating complete with masked models. They update nearly daily, looks like 6 updates per 7 days.
Over 2,100 models, some look like amateurs, but a lot are pros.
Immoral Live is included and it is a very good site plus is the only one that isn't just blowjobs.
Navigation works well considering the size the network.
Video quality is excellent. |
| Cons: |
Blowjobs are fun to watch, but there are really a lot of blowjobs on this network! It gets repetitive.
The network hub page feels cluttered, but there's only one ad. They just have a lot of content on the main page. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network reminds me of when I lived in India. We were visited by family friends from the United States. My parents took them out to for dinner and they couldn't believe everything on the food bar -- was chicken or a form of chicken. That is how this network makes me feel. There's a lot of blowjobs and more blowjobs. There are other sexual actions that happen and there is the site Immoral Live which is very good, but the scenes here are about the chicken -- I mean, blowjobs.
The Covid Pandemic scenes are a little out there since the guy wears a mask while getting a blowjob and the woman starts out with a mask on. That's going to get complicated. I do like how they have this network laid out. The sites are: Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs, Throated, 1,000 Facials and Immoral Live. It makes it easy to find your preferences whether teen blowers, MILF blowers, deep throaters or facials. Immoral Live is like a hardcore site with the content being recorded live without cuts or scripts. It is a nice break from all the blowing.
The video quality on this network is as good as I have come to expect from a Gamma site. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p on all scenes with the newer scenes also adding 4K. With over 5,500 scenes that's a lot of high quality porn. The models do look like professionals or soon to be professionals. As a female I think that does change these scenes. The pro models seem to have a steady, consistent pattern they follow when giving a blowjob. That does make the content repetitive too. It makes me wonder why guys are so much into blowjobs.
This network is a good value. But I did find myself losing interest in it. I think for fans of blowjobs it's an easy choice to join, but if you're not a real big fan of blowjobs, I'm not for sure I would recommend it. It has all the traits you look for in a good porn site, pretty models, high quality videos, easy to use navigation, not a lot of annoying ads, unlimited downloads from what I have experienced, but it does get stuck at it's mostly blowjobs. Good enough for a month join to give it a try and to also check out Immoral Live. |
|
09-09-20 02:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Holed
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful American models. I found them all to be outstanding.
Segpay is the biller.
168 updates with a trailer and a photoset for each video
Fast downloads and easy navigation.
Nice production values, enjoyable scenes.
All videos available for download up to 4K |
| Cons: |
Prechecked cross sale where you don’t expect it. There is a drop down box for yes or no.
I wish these sites would either start naming the filenames what the scene is or hire someone to come organize these scenes for me. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t usually look for anal focused sites, but it was interesting anyway. The site is very professional in its production values as well as the selection of models.
There are many beautiful American models, 122 to be precise. Some I did not know, but many were big names in the industry. As I am sure people know by now, I am a collector of some favorite models and I found some videos here that I have never seen before. The ultimate pro Jynx Maze has three scenes that were new to me. A few others were quite good starring Kendra Spade and Chloe Amour. I loved Asian May Thai and hope I can find more of her scenes. She has that natural Asian petite look that I find irresistible, and she is a great performer as well. I would have preferred more ethnic variety, but at least there were a few scenes with MILFs for a variety in age. It would be hard for me to recommend the site by itself unless you're a collector. They have a few models I collect and this content is exclusive.
The technical quality is as high as you will find. The oldest video on the site has the typical 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K options and a 720p WMV option as well. I am happy with 720 HD, but some feel a need for the best quality available.
In June and July there were three updates. The older videos are not dated, so I don’t know what is happening here. At the moment there are 168 updates and as many photo sets for each. You do get value for your money, even if it eventually becomes an archive site.
Downloads were very fast and were as fast as my computer can operate. I was able to max out my system at about 80 to 85 percent.
I think they could make it easier by letting you pick your username and password. As it is, you have randomly generated usernames and passwords that you have to keep going back to look them up to enter them. I also would have liked if the file names were all unique. I did not see any reason to have to rename every video download. They also don’t have any scene descriptions, so you are not sure what you will get. At least there is a trailer for each video.
I found many interesting scenes, it's a good site overall. |
|
08-12-20 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This has to be the biggest transsexual site.
Over 2,000 models and over 6,000 scenes.
Interesting way of releasing and categorizing scenes: Climax Mondays, Tryout Tuesdays, Post-Op, Hardcore and Model of the Month.
Some of the prettiest transsexuals I have ever seen.
They update 6 days a week.
Scenes with women having sex with the transsexuals. |
| Cons: |
Some of the least attractive transsexual models I have ever seen. I am sure the large number of models goes into this.
The site goes beyond overwhelming. I do not know the word for beyond overwhelming. It does hurt the usage and navigation of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is supposed to be the best, the biggest and oldest transsexual porn site on the internet. It says it has been around since 1995. The first scene that I noticed led me to join despite a fairly high price. It has Joanna Angel from Burning Angel in a threesome with two transsexuals.
I went to the advanced search since I can’t find any categories. Surprising and a little disappointing, there are only 9 scenes with transsexuals having sex with women and one is the Joanna Angel scene. They made up for that when I searched for solo and they have over 600 solo scenes. Some of these solo scenes are unbelievably good. One has very large boobs that look natural, an 8 inch dick and she cums 3 times without stopping.
In doing a direct comparison to Ladyboy Gold which I also joined and reviewed, the models here – overall, are not as attractive to me as Ladyboy Gold’s models, but that is just a subjective preference.
I do think part of that is because these are transsexuals and not ladyboys. A lot of these models have a more masculine frame and build. It’s not the case with all of the models though. Some of these girls look like teen girls I have seen on solo teen girl sites like Nubiles.
It has only happened a couple of times, but I think should be mentioned. When going to download a file a screen pops up that says they don’t recognize my machine and they have to send an email with a code for me to input. I have used the same computer each time I have been on the site. Their quality is very high starting with a 480p file that goes up to 4K and that’s on all of the newer scenes I have watched. You can download or stream. They also have photo sets you can download of each scene and screencaps that can be downloaded too.
I did find the Post-Op section to be interesting and wonder how many straight males would be into that. They did a good job on the surgery.
The advanced search is expansive, and it works. You can even make multiple selections in it with choices like cock size (small, average, 7.5+) hair color, type of action, so it really shouldn’t be this overwhelming but it is and I think so because there are quite a few of the models I don’t find attractive.
They include a bonus section with content from other transsexual sites. I have never thought this was a good idea since the competitor is probably sending their best content.
I do think I am being a little hard on the attractiveness part and want to explain that. They have so many models, if I picked out the ones, I find attractive, it would probably be a higher number than any other transsexual site.
They also have a full model list which does not help me much since it would take forever to go through 2,000 models. They do seem to do everything right though.
One part I find confusing and maybe it’s a non-issue. When I first heard of Grooby Girls it was on T-Girl Japan. I want to think the content from that site is on this Grooby Girls site since it said Grooby on it, but I’m not for sure it is. When you look at how many site Grooby has, over 40, you have to wonder if that means you have to join each of those sites to get the specific content. This would be a major negative to me since all of their sites are over $30. I do think that is the case. When I use the advanced search, it has three countries listed, the UK, Spain and the United States. I did reduce the score for this. If they can tell me I was wrong in this assumption, I will add some points back. It seems crazy to think you would have to spend over $1,000 just to get all their content.
I can recognize their importance to the transsexual niche, but that’s just too much content spread out across many sites. |
|
07-15-20 04:12am
Replies (2)
|
Review
140
|
Innocent High
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the premier schoolgirl sites.
Bills through Epoch.
They have 468 scenes, but the updates have slowed greatly.
Each scene has a video, photo set and screencaps, all can be downloaded.
Newer scenes are using variations on the traditional schoolgirl outfit and those are some of the best on the site.
Good site for those into fetishes, besides the outfits.Nearly all scenes depict an older man (teacher or tutor) with a young woman. There also is light to mild spanking in most scenes.
Almost all of the scenes have a short story to start (late for class, didn’t do homework, was caught cheating on a test). |
| Cons: |
Since April 2019 there have been only 5 updates. They are averaging about 1 update per 2 months.
They could have more lesbian scenes to cut back on the monotony of older male, younger female in every scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
Innocent High’s oldest scenes shows it started out as strictly a schoolgirl site with the models in the older videos all wearing the same outfit based on the fictional “Innocent High”. The newer scenes still have the schoolgirl outfits in most scenes, but they are no longer branded with the Innocent High logo on the uniforms like the old ones. This is an improvement. Other changes in the newer scenes include older female teachers having sex with younger male students. They also have started leaning on the home tutoring and home testing to give the scenes a different setting than just the same classroom they used in the earliest scenes.
The archive of content here helps offset the slow update schedule with 468 scenes you’re more likely to get bored with the content than run out of content. This site has been around a long time. The earliest scenes go back to 2005. Those scenes have a top video resolution of 576p. By 2011 they started adding 720p and 1080p resolution videos.
You basically have a handful of scenarios here: Student (male or female) is late for class, didn’t turn in homework, said a “bad” word in class and the teacher makes them stay after class as punishment. The spanking here is as much playful as it is serious though the lightest skin models do show the handprints on their butts. The newer scenes are more reminiscent of stepfamily porn even though there are no stepfamily scenes. The student goes to the teacher or tutor’s house or the teacher goes to the student’s house for extra credit and they sneakily have sex in the bedroom with the door closed or in the living room before the student’s parents come home. It does get redundant at times, but the girls are cute, the outfits are too, and the scenes are long. There’s more teasing early in these scenes than a lot of porn has in it.
This is a niche that seems to have lost its popularity in American porn, but if you’re a schoolgirl fan you’ll likely be pleased with this site. |
|
01-27-20 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Moms Teach Sex
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fun, cliched, stepfamily site with above average stories, believable or not -- is up to you to decide.
Gorgeous female models, the daughters, the moms, most of the guys are average looking.
Two updates per month, follows an episode count, season count, similar to a television show, but I don't see any connection from scene to scene.
1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 270p video options, photo sets and screen captures can be downloaded.
111 scenes currently, videos last 30 minutes plus and have acting so bad it's good.
At least most of the mother/daughter pairs look like they have enough age separation to be mother/daughters. |
| Cons: |
If bad acting bothers you this become a huge con. Nearly every scene has the moment where the daughter sees the guy's dick and her eyes bug out of her head or the mom walks in on the daughter doing something sexual with the guy and her eyes bug out of her head.
I wish they would update more often. I have a year membership to the network and it seems like they could at least get this site up to 1 new update per week. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems I've fallen into two traps in the porn internet industry. I either end up on a site that makes me pay extra for downloads or I end up on a site with stepfamily porn.
I think as someone not raised in the United States the taboo of stepfamily porn is much higher since I really didn't know any divorced families growing up in India.
This site is still small enough that you're not going to feel like there's too much content to see everything or download everything you want. At 111 scenes it's enough to keep you stocked up on stepfamily porn, but not too much to make you feel like you'll never even see the previews of all the content.
This one works well and the quality is very high with 5 different video resolutions available for downloads. The models on here are mostly young, slim and fit (to fit the daughter role) and the mothers are the hot MILF types. You kind of feel like the guy would be lucky to be with either the mom or daughter let alone both of them!
Because I have a year membership it's giving me a better chance to stream and decide which ones are worth downloading. The streaming player works very well. So far, I have downloaded about 50% of the scenes. As much as I like the bad acting, I grew up watching Bollywood movies, some of it is so over the top I can't even get passed how bad the acting is. My tip to sites with these stepfamily scenes is to not have the scenes where the mom "hears" sex going on and acts like she doesn't know what it is so she must go check.
This site would score higher if the scenes were a little longer (45 minutes or more), had more story and didn't follow a similar structure in each scene.
There are some scenes that become too formulaic feeling. Daughter in cowgirl, mom in missionary, daughter in doggystyle, mom in reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
It's still a very good site and part of the problem could just be the year membership. It's another good entry into the stepfamily porn niche with excellent quality making up for poor acting. |
|
01-06-20 09:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
Kink Men
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Kink's gay network has plenty of content for straight women too.
Includes six sites - 30 Minutes of Torment, Bound Gods, Bound in Public, Butt Machine Boys, Men on Edge and Naked Kombat.
Mostly very masculine, muscular men.
Other gay sites are included, but are not listed including Yes Sir Boys, Bound and Gagged, Boynapped and My Dirtiest Fantasy.
High Kink production values. |
| Cons: |
Four of the listed sites are no longer updating.
Scenes can be very repetitive.
Very little masturbation |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a fetish for watching men masturbate. It's not one that is easily fulfilled. There is some masturbation here, but most of what they have here is similar to the straight Kink content.
Thirty Minutes of Torment is a man being bound, touched, whipped, spanked and put through 30 minutes of torment by another man. These scenes are okay. There's only so much believable safe pain before it starts to become uncomfortable to watch and this site, for me at least, pushes that limit.
Bound Gods is probably the best of the sites and it's a very large site that is still updating. While it's not much different from Thirty Minutes of Torment, there is less of a violent edge to it. It has nearly 600 scenes in its back catalog and there are varying themes which is also different than Thirty Minutes of Torment. You see the production values more on this site.
Bound in Public is a lot like their straight site Public Disgrace. You have a group of men dominating one man and while it says public, a lot of the scenes are not in public. It would appeal to those into male exhibitionism which I think is very rare. It's not a small site either at over 240 scenes, but it is no longer updating.
Butt Machine Boys is the closest the network comes to male masturbation and is the gay version of Fucking Machines. Men use the powered and motorized dildos on themselves while masturbating. I do like this content quite a bit as there is a common theme with all of these sites have muscular men on them. It only has around 150 scenes and isn't updating, but for those into male masturbation they might want to download all of the scenes.
Men on Edge is the most unique site of these. The scenes while not much different than the other sites on this network, bring in some story and there's more of a feeling of dominance which isn't easy to do with two males. This is another bigger site at over 300 scenes and it is still updating.
My feeling with this content is they tried to go for male/gay versions of their straight sites and the men just aren't flexible enough to perform the scenes the way the female performers do. Some of the content is very sexy, while some of it just makes me look away. There doesn't seem to be much of a middle ground.
They also have the gay site Naked Kombat that is their gay version of Ultimate Surrender. It has the same positives and negatives as the female version. Some of it looks planned/staged as the action seems to change at the same time in each scene. There are cringe-worthy moments like a guy having his dick in another man's butt and the guy falling back on his dick.
There are multiple other gay channels including the ones I listed in the pros. They have 7 other ones and a bisexual male site with male/male/female scenes. These look like licensed content from larger standalone sites.
The videos follow a Kink standard of the largest available resolution being 1280x720, their streaming player works well which is important for me on a network like this. It let's me scan through the scene to see if there's going to be parts I would be interested in.
With Kink's production values I think they could do better with the gay genre. I would like to see them take the bisexual niche and do something like a male masturbating with a female in a cell watching him and a male in another cell watching him. Whichever one orgasms first gets to have sex with him. I think that shows why I don't score this site higher. It just feels like they took the straight content and made it into gay content without really putting any thought into the scenes.
It's not bad and is one of the better gay sites I have been a member of. I would think it appeals to gay men more than straight women and it's good if that's your interest.
The score would be lower if not for the very attractive, athletic men they feature. |
|
11-12-19 01:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site that I meant to join multiple times. It’s what I am going to call personal porn. Not really POV, but some of it is.
It’s a good-sized site, but the numbers may be a little off. I have noticed a lot of remastered scenes coming in as new updates.
The models are cute to very pretty. I don’t know how much I believe the amateur part. I recognized a lot of names. There are 568 models.
The remasters include a 4K download option, but I don’t see it on the other new updates. There is a download limit that probably makes it make more sense to download the 1080p or 720p.
A continuing trend I am seeing on more sites, the ability to join through Epoch using Paypal.
Pretty colors in the scenes and backgrounds. They do something with the lighting that causes it to be bright and clear, but soft. |
| Cons: |
This may be an unfair con. I noticed the amount of “new” scenes that are just remastered old scenes. I’m putting it in the cons because of comments left on those videos like, “Wow great scene! Can we see her again?” The watermark says 2007. They’re not making clearly obvious on remasters. Some of those do, but not all and those are counting as updates.
Since I joined, they have updated 4 times (weekly) and 3 of those were remasters. I don’t mind that. I hadn’t ever been a member before. I do want to mention for those that have been a member before. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site and the site I think they also own called Swallow Salon. Amateur Allure probably was a groundbreaking site when it started. The first thing I noticed was the manipulation of lighting. Those bright lights should be a lot harder to look at in a video, but they are either using soft light bulbs or some kind of filter. The action is very clear and there’s no blaring lights in your eyes.
The scenes are mostly the same. The models are supposed to be amateurs and there are 568 of them. Some of them likely are amateurs. Others include ones I know by name like Kiara Cole, Aidra Fox and Adriana Chechik. It could be where the scenes are remastered and maybe they were amateurs at the time.
The scenes stick to a formula which is common for this style of porn. I do believe this is a site that women may like. I have noticed in the comments there are comments about the guy and different guys that are in the scenes. Including seeing a few that said, “He’s hot!” There may be some appeal for straight women and gay or bisexual men. There is a focus on the guy’s dick. I believe if I watched this porn about 13-15 years ago, I would have been very impressed with it.
There is a download limit, but I cannot confirm that. I have not hit it. If you download the 720p or 1080p, I don’t see why you would hit it. It is 25GB per day. I don’t mean to be negative about The Best Porn Review, but maybe things have changed? The review was posted in late February 2022. I read it before joining and could see that there was a lot more to the site than the review said. It makes it sound like this is a blowjob only site. This site has full sex, doggy, cowgirl, missionary and the only part that really highlights the oral is the cumshot. The review also said there are hundreds of 4K blowjob videos. For example, the April 1st, 2022 update does not have 4K download. The remasters do. A lot of the new updates are remasters. Of the last 10 updates, 6 are remasters and 4 are genuine new scenes. None of those 4 have 4K downloads. I do think that matters with a site like this one that has been around for well over 10 years. Some people may not value those 4K remasters, if they have them in a smaller resolution. It also was mentioned as a potential problem with the download limit. Saying the videos average 6GB per scene. I haven’t seen one that is 6GB, even for the 4K option. The 1080p files for these scenes are 1-1.5GB each and the 720p files are 700MB to 1GB. This has thrown me so far off my normal reviewing style. I’m now noticing not all remasters are 4K. My advice is don’t let that be a dealbreaker. I haven’t hit a limit and have downloaded 72 scenes and the photos are worth looking at. They also feature the light manipulation which makes the pictures clearer.
These scenes are near cookie-cutter. Blowjob to start, doggy, missionary, cumshot. I do believe the camera angles and lighting made it groundbreaking years ago. I liked the site well enough to try Swallow Salon too. Good site overall, but it does become repetitive. |
|
04-11-22 07:10pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
144
|
TS Raw
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large ladyboy site that I’m not for sure if it’s updating, even though it shows a January 2022 update.
Good site for people to get their first experience with ladyboys.
There are 4K downloads available, but it’s why I have a red flag about the new updates. A few of those do not have 4K while the older updates do.
It almost makes me blush to say, the biggest dicks I have seen on ladyboys besides someone like Long Mint.
Fairly kinky scenes, no condoms, a lot of rimming and the males in the scenes are mostly attractive too.
There are 483 scenes on this site. It does show new updates. I haven’t been a member for two years. I can’t really go back to the downloads I have and see how much if any is recycled. |
| Cons: |
Just based on the name you’re not going to get much solo action which is my preference and you’re not going to get the ultra-rare ladyboys with a female.
The oldest scenes are from 2009 and those are very small resolution. I believe maybe 360p. The older scenes are not really worth the hassle. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a highly recommended site for males that are interested in transsexuals. The ladyboys, in my opinion, are an easier place to start. There is a more feminine side to the ladyboys. The one glaring problem I see is the implants are very noticeable. It looks kind of like most American porn sites. I do not mind as much. I would love to see these ladyboys in solo. Some of these ladyboys on this site are probably more in the range of 5-7 inches in dick length. There are much better erections than you see on a lot of ladyboy sites. I do not have the knowledge of how this all works in the porn industry. These ladyboys remind me more of slimmer, smaller framed transsexuals. I don’t believe they’re taking a lot of hormone therapy. I’m not for sure these ladyboys cross that transgender line like a lot of ladyboys do.
One of the scenes listed as a newer update has the model DeeDee in it. The model names on these sites are terrible to say the least. They do the same name with a number behind it like Patty 3, Emmy 4. I believe Long Mint, one of the best known ladyboys is on this site. She’s likely listed as Mint. It is a very large site with nearly 500 scenes. There’s nothing resembling a story or plot in these scenes. There’s not a lot of kinkiness other than the bareback part. You don’t see hardly any ladyboy topping the male on this site. That’s where the site’s age shows. It’s why some of the other sites I reviewed show a progression and some creativity. The best part about these scenes is looking at the pretty ladyboys with the big dicks. I hate to reduce myself to that, but it is the selling point of this site. I find it very arousing when the ladyboy is in reverse cowgirl and her hard dick is pointing straight up and not moving.
That is why I think this is a good place to start. It’s not going to require the viewer to enjoy anything other than seeing people aroused. Even with the risk of becoming repetitive and dull from scene to scene, the one part that saves it is the ladyboy. I have learned about size perception. I know that Long Mint herself has talked about she has a very large dick, but she’s also tiny. It makes her dick look even bigger than it really is. She showed her hand size, and it was more like a female’s hand. You see those scenes with her and you’re really looking at a small female’s hand around that erect dick. Long Mint is one of the few ladyboys I know of that has talked about her life and what it’s like. She even speaks fluent English.
There’s no reason for males to feel threatened by these little ladyboys looking like they’re packing 8-9 inches. It’s probably closer to 5-6 inches. These scenes are not as interesting as the newer scenes on their other sites. It’s very straightforward sex.
I checked the video quality of those newest updates. Those have 720p and 1080p. That’s the January and December updates. The updates before those two have an added 4K download option. I don’t believe I recognize these two newest updates. I like both of them. I believe I would remember. The one is with DeeDee, she is one of the ladyboys that is very capable of keeping an upward pointing erection during reverse cowgirl. She may be the best at it. She does have a very noticeable boob job. The other is Lee 3 who is one of the cuter ladyboys that surprising to me has no trouble getting and keeping an erection. She looks teeny, tiny in frame. Her legs are half the thickness of the male that’s with her. It’s her weight that makes her look so small. She is 5’5” according to site and 94 pounds.
I enjoy this site and have for years. It’s never changed much. It isn’t going to touch on many fetishes. It’s still a good place to see what you think of ladyboys. |
|
02-08-22 06:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Ladyboy Glamour
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very important site that I think people could learn from. It’s not that great of a porn site.
There are only 97 scenes and most of them are 10 years old. There is a use for these scenes.
A look behind the scenes with some of the scenes being called behind the scenes. Keep in mind, these are ladyboys.
Some of the scenes are solo masturbation my favorite in transsexual and ladyboy porn. Those are longer scenes.
The scenes seem to reach their highest download resolution at 720p. The scenes are clear enough to get the point of the scenes. There is an erotic side to these scenes.
The scenes show a less sexual side and more of the prettiness of the ladyboys. |
| Cons: |
It’s not porn except for the masturbation scenes. The good part is there are more masturbation scenes than the very short behind the scenes videos.
It's not updating. I don’t know that I would classify all these models as ladyboys. Since it’s called Ladyboy Glamour, I expected all Ladyboys. A few of these models look more like European or Spanish transsexuals. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is probably the last reason anyone would join this network unless they are into solo masturbation. There are some very good solo scenes on the site. One of my all-time favorites called, “Garden of Eden” featuring the model Lekila. That is a ladyboy that has implants that look as real as any implants I have seen.
This site serves a purpose of showing the ladyboys and transsexuals in a less than sexual way. Which is almost always how they are shown or portrayed. You can really pick up the feminine personalities. The feminine voices. You can tell they are like us other females, trying to look pretty. I believe that is important to the transsexual community. This does go into transgender. The only thing masculine about the models is their dick. The newer scenes on this site are more focused on the behind the scenes parts. It shows the models getting dressed, getting their makeup put on and being feminine. It’s interesting for me to watch as a female. I start to realize they’re more feminine, in a lot of ways, than I am. One of the ones is upset that her Chanel shirt doesn’t fit well and doesn’t do a good job of showing her natural hormone-produced boobs.
Once you add the masturbation scenes, for me, it’s a very good site. I believe it takes more guts for the ladyboys to masturbate. Their dicks are usually not very big. One even says her balls are longer than her dick. Most of these ladyboys look to be in the 2-4 inch range in length. They often do not reach a full arousal even if they cum. That is a reminder their hormones are not masculine. I find these models cute and pretty, feminine and overall, attractive. This shows them how very few sites ever will. If it was a site with female and male models. The getting to know and what goes on in the mind of, isn’t that interesting. These are models that are unlike the majority of models we see in porn. I don’t think I would call it educational. They are masturbating in most of the scenes. I would have liked to see more focus on photos even. There is butt plug play. Pierced bellybuttons, some of the best looking boobs you will see in transsexuals or ladyboys. I believe that is what the site is going for. It’s showing how feminine these models are. I think this is funny as a female. They’re not happy about their lipstick color. Or they want a cuter piercing for their tiny bellybutton. It’s such a unique site. I don’t think there is another site that shows transsexuals or ladyboys like this. It’s sad that they stopped updating years ago. I am looking at one as I type this. Her name is Mosiny. She has nearly perfect boobs. I believe those are implants, at most those are 32-34B maybe. Her thighs look like a female with her legs open. She has one of the smallest dicks I have ever seen. I’m not for sure she’s much over 2 inches even when aroused. She has her pubic hair nice and trimmed. She’s more interested in using a butt plug than playing with her dick.
I know it’s not for everyone. I do think everyone should watch one of these scenes. It’s not often you get to call porn today – unique. You can this site. |
|
02-08-22 06:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
TS Seduction
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the Kink Original sites that lasted almost to 2022. A very good transsexual site if you like transsexuals with men.
It’s a large site with 651 scenes.
The transsexual model is often the dominant one. That does make this different than most transsexual sites.
Most of the scenes are long (over 30 minutes).
There is bondage, suspension devices and just plain, straightforward scenes.
You can download photo zip files. |
| Cons: |
As much as I like transsexuals and this site, transsexuals with men is my least favorite niche in the transsexual genre.
Other than the newest scenes, 720p is the highest download option on the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t know if this site has officially stopped producing content. There were 4 new scenes in November 2021. The word “seduction” is used loosely. In some ways, humorously. Like the scenes where the straight man is tied up. No seduction needed if they’re tied up! The site probably shows its age. It has been around since 2007. Transsexual is viewed quite a bit differently in 2022 than it was in 2007.
This site is a regular Kink site. I mean it is rougher than regular porn. It wasn’t a mainstream site when it started. There originally was more bondage, rougher play. One of my favorite transsexuals was a regular performer, Mistress Soleli. After transsexual transitioned to more acceptable, the site did lose some of its edginess, but it by no means lost its appeal. I talked about in another of my reviews of transsexual site, I like to see what I call straight male-friendly transsexual porn. I don’t think this is straight male-friendly.
If I had one major complaint with the site it's that the site never really tried to be anything more than a transsexual topping a male. It was difficult for me to see that control shift in every scene. I would feel the same way if a site focused on a woman being the only one in control in a straight scene. It is TS Seduction, after all. It is also the easiest way to say, without being offensive, the main transsexuals on this site are more masculine.
It went from being a very good site with a lot of potential to being just an okay site. The slowdown or stoppage from Covid stopped what looked like a possible shift in thinking/casting. More feminine transsexuals like Eva Maxim and Chloe Kay (one of the prettiest transsexuals for me) are in a couple of the newer scenes. I believe I said it once before about the average transsexual on this site. There is a rougher, harder look to the average transsexual on this site. Kind of like crossdressing men.
The site is still worth checking out, even if it’s just for the older scenes like when Gia Darling was on the site and Mistress Soleli. The site does offer over 600 scenes which is far above average for a transsexual site. I would recommend any that try it out to stick with the older scenes. |
|
02-08-22 05:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Class Blowjob
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with three other sites in the Sensual Girl Network
Very beautiful and glamorous models showcased very well
Every video is at least High Definition
One of the best blow job sites I have ever been a member of
Twenty six of the 137 videos have two or more models |
| Cons: |
There is no mention of the dates that new videos are being posted
Only six updates are Full High Definition and none are in 4K |
| Bottom Line: |
They should have called this site First Class Blow Jobs as that is exactly what you get here. Everything about the videos is close to perfect for me and I believe most women would agree. Wow.
The models are a mix of professionals that I have seen on other sites, to first timers and pretty much all of them look great. The ones I have seen before on other sites look better here and I credit the way the site showcases their looks. All of them are white and I am pretty sure from Eastern Europe. They don’t talk and I know enough about porn to know that is a clue as to where they are from. There is not much of a mix of ages or body types, but the models here are among the best of the best in porn of the last few years. The guys look a few years older, but the small age difference is not played up. They are mostly fairly good looking and these women get them really hard. The focus is not on the guys very much, as they are just there so the women can take advantage of them. In some cases you don’t see much of the big head, but the little head is what I joined for anyway. The guys don’t seem to mind being an object of pure lust, but in contrast the women get very enthusiastic about doing the deed.
I liked that in nearly every scene there is ball play and a lot of attention is focused on them. I have found many guys in real life are a bit, let’s say squeamish about being touched down there, let alone being licked. Here I would say there is a lot of worship of the family jewels. Additionally, although I did not mind it, there was also a lot of rimming going on too. Not my favorite sex act, so consider yourself advised that it does happen. At least I can say that it is done rather enthusiastically, so it is good to see models having fun together.
The cumshots are big enough, no complaints there. In nearly all cases you get to see them in all their glory with the screen filled with nice visuals. There is some cum swallowing too and it seems very satisfying as a conclusion to what happens after such enthusiasm.
I liked the scenes that had two young ladies in them. Twenty six videos were not enough for me, I want more like that. They took turns, shared licking together, cum and in general were terrific fantasies that I think many women would like to watch. Speaking of fantasy, the camerawork and the style of presentation create a fantasy for the mind as well as the eye.
As much as I liked the content, I think the website itself is in need of a makeover. I did not see any scene descriptions of more than a few words, such as sweet swallow or dong lifter. Those sound like interesting tee shirt slogans. I recognized some of the models, but the site does not credit who is in the scene. As some are advertised as first timers, I assume they mean on camera, I would like to follow their careers after the ones they did so well here. I can’t help but wonder if any of these first timers went on to be big names in the industry.
The archive is fairly good sized with 137 videos of at least HD quality, as well as photo updates. I thought the photos were not much, but I admit I don’t care about photos anyway. Besides all this, it is part of a four site network called Sensual Girl. The other sites are Oldje, Class Nudes, Class Threesome, which has two women paired with one guy as an unusual focus. The main site is Oldje, which is one of the best, maybe even the best, to focus on older men with much younger women. |
|
02-05-22 11:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Bondagettes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I just saw where this is a new listing from Adult Prime and thought I would try it since I like BDSM.
There are 116 scenes, but it doesn’t look like it’s updating. The last update was in October 2021, and they were updating weekly up until then.
This is likely true BDSM/bondage.
The videos can be downloaded in HD, no 4K.
One of the dom women is really pretty and sexy. |
| Cons: |
This is not my first time reviewing a BDSM site from this network and I have the same feeling with this one. It’s not for everyone. It’s only for people that truly are into real BDSM/Bondage.
A con I don’t like posting, most of the women are average at best in looks and some are well-below average.
The dom male/rope master, whatever he is called, is also unattractive.
Cameras flashing throughout the scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is near a “yikes” for me. I understand that BDSM is a real fetish and bondage is as well. I understand that there is a concept of power and control being explored in BDSM. I understand that many subs can get to or even achieve orgasm from being tied up. These scenes are elaborate with the contraptions. Women that look in the weight range of 150-175, suspending from the ceiling, spinning in the air, but this is one time I have to remind myself and the director, this is porn.
The closest I see to porn is the sub is naked. Most of these women are on the heavier side. Suspending them from the air is just asking gravity to work against their bodies. I am not making fun of them. I am, however, saying this is maybe sexually gratifying for the model or the dom, but it doesn’t give much visual stimulation to the viewer.
The part I noticed most is there is a tall, redheaded, dom female that – just being honest – is hotter than any of the models, but she keeps her clothes on. I know that I talked about this in my last review of one of this studios BDSM sites – there is no sex. None. The videos are 12-20 minutes of a dom tying a nude, chubby woman up, raising her on pulleys to swing from the ceiling, spinning her around, then the closest I have seen to sex it is flicking of the nipples.
That is a weakness of this genre. I believe when sites show the bondage, but it leads into sex, the traditionalists that are into the fetish are going to be disappointed about the fetish stopping for the sex. If you just stick to it like they are now, the people wanting sex are going to be disappointed. If the women were more attractive. You can almost always see their boobs. You can almost always see their butts. Their pubic hair. There is very little explicit.
When you post a review like this one, you except a bunch of fetishists to show up and be angry. This, to me, does not qualify as porn. I wanted to be as sure of what I was saying before saying it. Porn is defined as something made to create sexual excitement. My feeling when watching these scenes is I hope the woman doesn’t fall. I do not see sexual feelings coming from watching this. I am sure there are, no I’m not, I’m going to leave that to show I was trying to talk myself into someone will see this as sexual. I can’t. It looks more like demonstrations of how to create bondage and make it work with a naked woman as the test dummy. Nothing makes me want to touch myself. The dom, especially the male, he looks like he is studying the ropes. He doesn’t touch the women. You may a scene or two that does. I watched 12-13 and it was all I was wasting my time on. This just looks so obscure and very narrow-reaching niche type content that 1% of people will find sexual. Maybe that’s why the updates have stopped. I just happened to notice it was just listed on Porn Users and The Best Porn. It is not for me. I’m not going give it that low of a score because it comes with very good Adult Prime network. If you have a membership, take a look at this site and you’re welcome to tell me it’s very sexual to you. I would like to know that makes this sexual. |
|
01-12-22 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
149
|
Teach Me Fisting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Unchartered waters for me, have never watched or tried fisting.
There are 656 videos for me to find out what the big deal with this genre is about.
Mostly attractive European models.
Video quality is very good except on the older videos. Where it is still an acceptable 540p.
Navigation is simple, but the tags are poorly done. You’re better off scrolling and looking for what you want to see. |
| Cons: |
Site is no longer updating, it does look like based on their last update’s date, it’s possible Covid played a part in the ending of this site which was 15 years old.
It is listed as, "Anal Fisting, Deep Pussy Insertions And Extreme Lesbian Sex", but a lot of the scenes from 2006 - 2014 have men in them. I do believe that hurts this genre. The difference in hand size helps make these scenes easier to watch.
I didn’t get as much a lesbian or sex feeling from the scenes. I thought there would be more action besides the fisting. |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t a genre that draws me to it. Especially when I see a fist up the woman’s vagina and another fist up her ass. I don’t know if this site was more of a daredevil site or even sex stunt site, but I don’t feel much sexual tension from the actors and actresses.
The scenes do risk going into redundancy. There are a lot of painful looking situations like the double fist in one orifice and any of the two fists. I’m thinking this is where I’m losing my comfort level. That was on the older scenes. The newer scenes seem to be a completely different site and producer. The newer scenes live up to maybe extreme lesbian sex, but there is more sexuality and sensuality in the scenes. There is kissing, oral sex, and it does make me feel like I felt I would feel about fisting. I don’t see the same from the male/female scenes. I would even call some of the female/female scenes deeply erotic and sensual. The female “fister” doesn’t go for the full fist. It starts with oral, a finger, maybe two, and there is more of a progression which would be natural as the vestibule opens more as arousal sets in. The female/female newer scenes are really some of the best lesbian scenes I have watched. Maybe there is an added feeling that this can’t be faked? The woman being fisted is aroused and experiencing growing arousal. I like it. I am going to have to look more into the sites that only feature women fisting each other.
This site, though large, with 656 scenes, features at least 50% of those scenes with a male involved. If I were to make a gender equivalent comparison it would be the difference in a male enjoying watching a female or even male give another male a blowjob compared to watching the female or male squeezing, maybe even going into cock ball torture. The difference is night and day. The site no longer updates and that is a shame since the newer scenes are all female/female. The video quality on the majority of the scenes has the up to 1080p option for downloads, but the first year or two only have a 540p option. It’s definitely different and even though I do like kinky porn, I guess we all have our boundaries. There are very good picture sets with each scene. Each photo set has over 100 photos and the resolution on the high resolution zipped photos is 5400x3100. I would even like to know if they maybe are considering restarting the site. It looks like they completely overhauled it with the change in male/female to all female, the very good picture sets and found a way to make what looks and even sounds like a harsh sexual act into something sexy and sensual.
I am open to suggestions for other sites with similar all-female fisting content. |
|
08-09-21 03:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
Summer Sinners
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very realistic, amateur (I think), exhibitionism scenes
The most unscripted porn I have seen.
Variety of scenarios including lesbian, group, threesomes and foursomes.
Good camerawork for this type of porn.
Small site, but is newer with 38 scenes in less than a year. |
| Cons: |
Streaming only
There is so much talking in the scenes and maybe one out of 5 people are speaking English. The potential for hot stories is there, but I don’t know what they’re saying.
Price is high for a streaming only site. |
| Bottom Line: |
The scenes on this site have so much potential to be even better than they are. The first video I watched from it has a very young, maybe 19 year old, slender woman in a bikini with another woman using a wand vibrator on her while a guy is watching and getting a handjob from the woman who the wand is being used on. Some time passes and the guy moves to between the slender woman’s legs and sticks his dick in her while the other woman continues to use the wand on the slender woman. The guy says some English, “Very tight” and you can see he is visibly having problems penetrating her. Before this scene is halfway through the woman using the wand on the slender woman is naked and receiving oral from the slender woman while the guy is still having sex with her. Another woman enters the scene and the guy switches to her. I was left with the feeling the last woman to enter was his girlfriend or wife and she had been watching him have his fun with the younger women. But with no English it is hard to say for sure.
The streaming only is a downside to the site since I feel like this is the type of content you don’t or won’t see on a regular basis. These 38 scenes would be worth downloading for those times you wanted something a little less mainstream.
The scenes vary in location from a driving van to the beach to boats to indoors, but all stick with the summer theme. Nearly all of the scenes have the woman in a bikini or bathing suit. The exhibitionism is as much voyeurism as exhibitionism, multiple scenes have someone watching and masturbating. There are some scenes that involve sports and activities like naked yoga. There are scenes of women using wand vibrators while a group of women watch. It does seem unscripted to me. You will notice a guy just start touching a fully clothed woman and before you know it his hand is down her panties while others are looking or having sex too.
It kind of reminds me of the sites Party Hardcore and Dancing Bear without the male strippers. The women look to be having a lot of fun. They will even reach for their friend or friends to join in and help.
If this site had subtitles or English speakers with downloads I could see scoring it 10 points higher than my already good score. |
|
10-06-20 12:03am
Replies (0)
|
|
