Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A network of 30 sites that would have scored higher if not for help from reading other PU reviews.
This network has a very good, broad range of content, but it seems the content is used from other sites (Teen Mega World) and others too. It doesn't make it bad as I've not been a member on those sites.
Was joining through the TBP link at $19.95, but when I got to the sign-up page they had a New Year's special for $9.95.
Vendo is the payment processor.
My main reason for joining was the older men/younger women content, they have Tricky Old Teacher, Old Goes Young, Anal Old Young, She Made Us Lesbians (older lesbian with two younger women), Daddies and Darlings, and there's just a general theme of older/younger on the network.
Cons:
Not for sure which sites are updating. It says the latest update was on December 27th, 2019, I assume that is for the whole network.
No dates on the scenes that I've seen.
Pre-checked cross sale on sign up.
Bottom Line:
Having not been into joining porn sites for a long time there's a lot of content that's going to sneak by me without me knowing it was on other sites. I read a few of the PU reviews that mention some of this content is available on Teen Mega World, which I've not been a member of. That makes it difficult to review since if I never join Teen Mega World, I won't know that this content was available there too and I did get this whole network for $9.95.
The female models seem to be from the Eastern European (slim, small boobs, small butts) pool of models and the men are more times than not, older, some even gray-headed and look to be 2-3 times as old as the females.
The old/young sites on this network average 200-300 scenes, they have a good selection of video options from 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and even 2160p. Each video also has photo downloads.
There does seem to be a couple of common themes. There are cuckold sites, women using strap-ons on men (pegging) and women being in the dominant role. There are multiple older/younger sites including older men with younger women and younger men with older women. There are virgin based sites like Shabby Virgins, Spoiled Virgins and 18 year old Virgins. The Shabby Virgins one might be the most out of touch with reality site in porn. It's older women that are supposed to be virgins having sex with multiple younger men.
While I do feel like this is frustrating to know this content and maybe more of it is available on other sites, the $9.95 price for nearly 4,000 scenes with excellent download options makes it a better deal for me than maybe for others that have joined the sites this content is also on.
The navigation works well. You can browse by site, by model or by tags. As someone that has looked over Teen Mega World since the only scenes I would really be interested on it are the Younger/Older ones, maybe it's better this way to get all those scenes without the thousands of other scenes mixed in?
I also think that's who a network like this would be aimed at. It's like they've taken specific niches from another network and made it into a more simplified network. I ended up with just over 700 scenes I downloaded so I can't really complain about that for the $9.95 price.
I think others should at least look into it to see if maybe it would benefit them the way it did me. I'm pleased with the membership with just the one frustration with the thought there is more of the content I like on another site.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
All-natural female models with an emphasis on male/female sex.
Some of these models are knockouts! Mia Split, Romy Indy, Alyssa Reece are all worth looking deeper into their careers in porn.
Watching the guys try to have gentle to moderately paced sex with these beautiful women.
They are updating once per week. There are 988 scenes to choose from.
The video quality is high and the pictures are excellent quality, both are downloadable.
It’s easy to get around on the site, there are no ads and they have broken the scenes into pages so you don’t have to scroll forever.
Cons:
It’s romantic. I can’t believe I listed that as a con either. Everything looks so nice, the bedding, the curtains, and there’s nothing close to rough.
The scenes are repetitive and heavily scripted. Nearly every scene is right in the 25 minute area.
No more than 2 people in any scene! It’s porn! There has to be another guy around somewhere?
Bottom Line:
This site gets my attention with their all-natural models. I reviewed a site with mostly tattooed models not too long ago and questioned if tattooed people only have rough sex. This is the other side of it. Tell me it’s not true. These all-natural models do have rough sex sometimes, right? It feels like a social experiment or really bad job of stereotyping. I do like this site and really, I like it better than I expected to. I like Kink and a little edginess with my porn. There’s not much of either on this site. Mia Split may add a different twist to the site with her flexibility. She looks like the one that needs to be doing rough hardcore. If your body bends that much use it. I named off the other two too, Romy Indy and Alyssa Reece, they remind me of women I know. Which is the biggest selling point here. These women look like your next door neighbors. Maybe your next door neighbor’s daughters! I’m going to make it kinky eventually.
I did not list it as a con, but there is no story and very little dialogue. Maybe it’s just my newness to European porn, but shouldn’t this niche of porn have a story? Why are they making soft, passionate love? Was it a lucky Tinder find or did they just happen to walk into a house and decide to have sex? I do see it as a con, but the female models save it. The pairings with the males is also very good. You won’t see any foot-long dicks trying to squeeze into an 18 year old model. I wonder if they even paired these couples together for physical compatibility? I got that feeling in the Romy Indy scenes. There isn’t a long, 3-5 minute section in the videos of the woman trying to get the dick all the way in her. There is more focus on the man and woman being in tune with each other’s movements. That saves the site for me.
There are 988 scenes. With once a week updates they will be to 1,000 around the time my subscription runs out. The download options for videos includes all 988 videos having 1080p. I will mention the older scenes have 1080p, but not 720p, they jump from 540p to 1080p. The newer scenes have all the options from 4K down to two mobile versions, those also have 1080p and 720p, 540p, 480p and 360p.
I used to didn’t pay much attention to pictures, but have learned these more artsy sites have some really great pictures. The photo sets have around 80-100 photos in them. The resolution is 5800x3700 on the high-res download zips and there is a smaller resolution available too.
I may need to bury my head in the sand for saying I really like this site. I am sure I will want something rougher and kinkier to watch, but this is the best I have seen in the romantic style of hardcore. Can I get a vote for Romcore? I would recommend it to those into this style. I like it better than Sex Art and X-Art.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Varied network that draws from being the darker side of 21 Sextury
Currently has 4,491 scenes available across its 15 sites
Large collection of older/younger content with over 1,500 scenes between 3 sites.
All videos are downloadable and come with downloadable photo sets.
Covers multiple fetishes including pissing, speculum, fisting, femdom, transsexuals and even has some amateur content.
Newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p and down to 180p resolutions available.
Cons:
They have a very broad selection of models on this network. On their site Lusty Grandmas, there are some that look 40-45, and some that look 70-75. They aren't kidding about the extreme part.
Most of the models are professionals and you do get the "too professional" feel from some of the scenes, especially the fisting ones.
Slow download speeds on older videos.
Bottom Line:
I have an interest in the older/younger niche and reviewed several older/younger sites awhile back. I developed a recent interest in fisting and thought this network does a good job of covering multiple fetish niches.
The old/young sites are Lusty Grandmas, Grandpas Fuck Teens and Old Young Lesbian Love. These sites by themselves are worth a join. Most of the older/younger sites I joined had 200-300 scenes. These 3 sites have over 1,500. I usually prefer older woman with younger men, but believe the Grandpas Fuck Teens is the best of those three. You also can get your femdom/bondage/rough sex fix in with Mighty Mistress, Dominated Girls and Mandy is Kinky. The Zoliboy site has a combination of softcore and hardcore. Teach Me Fisting is a good, not great, fisting site that has other women helping the model learning to fist.
The quality is very good. Some of these sites haven't been updated for years, but most of the videos have a minimum of 720p and the newer ones have the 160p to 4K options. You have to go back to the oldest content to find videos with only 480p and 540p download options. In the cons I listed the download speeds on the older files. I was downloading a scene from Speculum Plays (2007) and it was only downloading at 1/6 my normal downloading speed. I haven't noticed it on all the sites in the network, but Speculum Plays does download slowly.
There is also a pissing and blowjob site rolled into one. There is an amateur site which looks out of place. The transsexual site looks like scenes taken from old DVDs.
I get the feeling this network was a bigger deal years ago. To me it felt more like I joined for the 3 older/younger sites and got a strange hodgepodge of sites thrown in. Speculum Plays is a better site than I expected since I am usually not into the gynecology sites. It has more of a the doctor is going to finger and masturbate the pretty girls instead of really showing much for a gynecology student to learn from.
This is a large network with over 1,200 models and close to 4,500 scenes. The older/younger sites they have are worth a 90. The other sites didn't interest as much. The fisting site is maybe too hectic and tries too hard to be extreme. The dom content is like a Kink-light. It's worth a join for those that are into older/younger, but I'm not for sure I could recommend it to anyone else unless they just joined for a month.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Network with 21 sites included.
Good coverage of multiple genres and niches.
Update schedule is not steady, but they had 9 new scenes in August and 2 so far in September.
10,439 scenes. The scenes consist of a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
Technical specs are high with newer videos having 4K
Good to very good production values, lighting and direction, albeit some scenes are very similar to other scenes.
Cons:
The scenes, unless the scenery or setting changes, are similar. You can even look at the times of the scenes and you see a consistent 21-25 minutes pattern.
A lot of the sites are not updating.
Older videos only have 240p and 480p downloads.
Bottom Line:
I am impressed with this network. They do a very good job of spreading their niches out. There are four specific anal sites on the network, two that could be considered anal (GapeLand and DP Fanatics). They have solo model sites like Aletta Ocean Empire, Blue Angel Live, Sex with Kathia Nobili and Sweet Sophie Moone. There are two sites aimed at the oral pleasure for men with Deepthroat Frenzy and Only Swallows. There also are four lesbian sites and they have two multi-genre sites with Club Sandy and Pix And Video. There is plenty of content from varying genres and niches to satisfy most viewers desires.
The only major complaint I have is the content does seem to be directed and even timed. Some of the sites have longer scenes, but the majority follow a strict order of sexual positions and do so in under 25 minutes. The updates look to be coming from 4-6 sites while the rest are not updating.
The models are very pretty to gorgeous. The male models seem to be highly professional. There isn’t much talking and there is little story to the scenes other than sex.
The amount of content is impressive with over 10,000 scenes. If the lower quality of the older scenes doesn’t bother you those are worth looking into too. The newer scenes are more plagued by the feeling they are following a flow chart.
I preferred going to each of the different sites instead of using the full network view. I liked these sites best: Cuties Galore, Footsie Babes, Anal Teen Angels and DP Fanatics. I think that shows a good example of how broad their content is in coverage of fetishes and niches.
Their update schedule doesn’t seem to follow an exact schedule. They will have a week with no updates then release new updates on back to back days. It does equal out to 9-10 new updates per month.
The network did change its focus. The older content is almost exclusively solo and lesbian with the newer content having more anal and more hardcore sex. I like either way depending on my mood. They do both styles well and sometimes I think a site like this shows why dialogue in porn isn’t as needed as we might think.
I do take some surprise from the scene names and screencap with it. One is called Sparkling and Sensual. The screencap shows a man pulling a woman’s hair with one hand and ripping at her panties with the other while she looks in pain. Another is Erotic Surprise and it has a young Asian model with a dick up her ass. Petty differences in language are good for laughing.
Overall, I liked it and would recommend it to anyone who wants more than one genre, niche or fetish.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of Adult Prime, it’s a newer site on the network and has potential.
Only 41 scenes with 1 new update per month, but considering how little supported this niche is, it’s a decent-sized collection.
All scenes available in up to 4K downloads.
Large contrast in attractiveness/age/body type of females and males. Not for sure that’s a big positive for me, but variety does make the niche interesting. It will be explained.
Though the genre is clothed female, the females don’t always stay clothed and that’s my favorite part of CFNM in porn. That also works as a con for some according to past replies to my CFNM reviews.
Cons:
I don’t believe everyone will find some of these females very attractive. It is an important part of the theme’s angle, to me, but judging a book by its cover isn’t going to help some of these scenes.
The scenes are too short. I can understand about it being a newer site (low total of scenes), but the scenes are also very short (under 15 minutes).
Needs better pictures especially in scenes with more than 2 people. Short videos plus 4-5 models including the male means very little camera time for everyone in the scene.
Bottom Line:
CFNM porn was one of the first genres I developed a fetish for. This site is kind of on the right track. They have high quality downloads of their videos including 720p, 1080p and 4K. There is a good blend of body types, ages from both the females and males. There is the added preference of mine of not every scene sticking strictly to nude female and not every scene only being a handjob. The biggest problem is the length of the scenes. I believe nearly anyone can get around unattractiveness if the fetish is strong enough. The amount of scenes and unattractiveness of some of the models will push those not that into the fetish away.
The reason I like the different looks, ages, body types is this is a pure lustful act. It is part of what hooked me on the genre when I first watched a CFNM scene. The general thinking would be the woman is so aroused by the nude male she doesn’t even take time to take her clothes off before giving him pleasure. In one of the most humorous replies, I have received about CFNM porn, a Porn User that only watches gay porn, told me, “I didn’t think about the fetish part of it. I just didn’t want to see the woman naked!” That’s an all-time classic. That is the allure of CFNM for most women. It is a woman drawn by the erect dick. She’s out of control and just has to at least play with it. Her clothes staying on represents she gets enough pleasure from his pleasure. She doesn’t even need him to touch her. That is something the genre has trouble sticking with. It could be the producers are not aware of the real fetish or it could be the females maybe need to get naked and touched to complete the scene. This genre is one of those where you will scenes that drag if the scene is very long. It’s boredom in the female. Those lose the fetish faster than the woman taking her clothes off. There is a CFNM network that sticks close to the CFNM part. As much as I like the fetish, I do prefer that some of the scenes turn into the female removing at least some of her clothes and also seeing more than just handjobs. I really want to believe these guys do not get off in 9 minutes from a clothed woman handjob. If you’re not careful with that, it ruins all other porn for you. You see the same guy in a full sex scene, and it takes him 45 minutes to get off. That’s getting into too complex. Why take 45 minutes while getting everything has to offer including nudity, but only take 9 when she leaves her clothes on and just uses her hand?
I believe this genre could have a brighter future. If we see more female involvement in porn production, I can see it taking off and becoming very popular even. I do believe the attractiveness of the female will be a make or break point. The women on this site some of them look at least 50s and they’re not the prettiest women in their 50s. There are some BBW models on this site. I don’t know if my mind just doesn’t compute all of that, but that seems like pushing the limit. I do think the older and even BBW models work well with very young, 18-21 year old, male models. It looks more like her seduction convinces him to close his eyes during the act.
The site is small and it’s going to take awhile to grow. It has 41 scenes. The updates are one per month. I do like that a lot of the scenes are outdoors or look like passable as public restrooms or locker rooms. That is where this genre can be complicated. A woman sitting on her couch giving a nude guy a handjob. Is just not selling the fetish for me. If you’re there at your house, why wouldn’t it turn into more? That is the other part of the fetish. By putting the scenes outside or what looks like a public location you add the feeling of they just saw each other and had to have each other.
I still don’t think I can complain that much. I am almost positive only one other CFNM site or network is updating today. If there’s a webmaster out there that has one and is updating, let me know. This is one of my favorite genres and it’s why I call it a fetish. It’s a good site to check out if you have an Adult Prime membership. I don’t know if I would tell people new to this genre that this is a good representation of the genre. Hopefully, my review even helps understand the fetishes that this genre can include.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
An enormous amateur site that has been online for 19 years.
Very intimate shoots with professional camerawork. Photo sets and videos are of very good quality.
These are the girls next door in porn. You will see all types of models here including hairy, very cute, average looking, small builds, bigger builds and everything in-between.
Has a tiered membership option that allows to pick what parts you join. They have solo girls, girl/girl and video masturbation. I'm not for sure those are worth doing as the cheapest by itself is $28, you can get all 3 for $39, which is what I did.
They have updated everyday of my membership (since September) and some days have two updates.
Features that you don't regularly see on porn sites like discussion board and newsletters.
The navigation says there are over 7,000 scenes and photo sets. These can be searched by girl-girl hardcore, boyfriend/girlfriend, girl groups, masturbating together and masturbating alone. It's exhaustive.
Cons:
The main con is probably the price. It's $39 for everything, but this is my second month, so it hasn't bothered me too much.
The differences from model to model can be hard to get used to when you're used to seeing every model at least look somewhat like the previous one.
Bottom Line:
This is my first time joining Abby Winters. It is a very large site with some of the best amateur content I have seen.
It's not the most user-friendly site, but I think it is better than I think it is. They have 1,792 models. You can filter them by age 18-35 or year released 2000 - 2019, also by solo, girl-girl, girl-boy and video masturbation. You can do an advanced search that has height, fetish tags (over 100) and sub-groups like "nude in public". I have never seen a site with this many options.
They have fetishes listed here I've never seen listed on other sites like "up shorts", "nude flexible yoga", "girls in tight shorts". The depth of these search features make the site overwhelming, but that's how you keep members around.
The solo scenes can vary from a 1 to a 10 from one scene to the next depending on what you like. When I watch solo women I liked to feel their confidence. You feel that in many of these. Other scenes you can tell it's the first time the woman has ever masturbated on camera.
The photo sets are also some of the most in-depth I have seen. There is some tease, some teasing into nudity, to explicit nudity and close-ups, all in one set. I don't know if all of their models are from Australia, but you do get a variety of models.
It could be a con to some. There are some very hairy models. There are some with almost no body hair.
You can download the photos in a regular size (whatever the standard camera resolution was at the time) and there are photos in high resolution to download if you prefer those.
The videos have a different style from one to the next. I have watched around 30 where the model seems new to sex toys. There is a woman talking to her and explaining how to use it. These are very erotic to me. There's a feeling of the model really is this new to this and is feeling this type of masturbation for the first time. Some randomly slip moans out, some seem to become tense and nervous and others show their enjoyment of it by speeding up and grinding their hips while using the new toy.
The girl-girl scenes are mostly fun and sexy. I would think this is how it looks the first few times a young woman tries with another young woman. You get everything from kissing, oral, 69, rimming and anal fingering in these scenes and because of the nature of the content, you don't really know what to expect on each scene.
Some of the women that look the shyest seem to be the least shy after viewing their scenes and the women you think are going to be confident and maybe even dominant, become timid. That is a very real factor you don't see in most porn.
The boy-girl scenes are not as good as the girl-girl or solo. These do seem to be real couples and you can tell they are more comfortable together even with a camera recording them. I noticed that there is no option to just join for the boy-girl scenes and I would assume that is why. They don't have the suspense the other scenes have. My personal favorite scenes are the mutual masturbation between two women.
These might be the most realistic porn scenes I have seen. It's a lot like watching amateur user-submitted type videos. You can see the curious women watching each other masturbate. At times, noticing when one speeds up, the other speeds up. There are ones where one will possibly instinctively grabs the thigh of the other. There is a level of interaction between the models in these scenes that surpasses the need for perfect looks or perfect bodies.
This is another site I would like to see a cheaper long-term membership offered for. The year membership is $329. It is probably worth that, but it's steeper than I want to pay at one time. I think the best option for me might be to let my membership run out then join for 3 months at $88. That would be a $35 discount over letting it recur 3 months in a row. I feel like I'm going to spend months going through all this content.
The women masturbating together is a niche I rarely see and it's one that as a non-lesbian, I can really enjoy and even understand.
There's a few more parts to mention. You can select your favorites and it works. Each scene has a little heart on it. You click it and it is stored for you to return to. This is very useful for browsing through multiple pages at a time without stopping to download. I currently have over 100 videos in my favorites. You can also add models to your favorites and each model has color coded dots on their profile that tells what all kinds of content they have like solo, girl-girl, boy-girl.
The video quality is excellent. They have 1080p scenes with 10k bitrates. They have 1240x576 versions, then two lesser versions. The older quality does drop, but they are still watchable.
I can't recommend it enough. This does not look like porn. It looks like people enjoying sex. I think I am scoring it LOW by giving it a 97 and that's just because I still am having trouble with the navigation and getting used to it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Military-themed gay site that also has some very good solo male videos.
Updates 5 times per month (includes remasters and compilations)
Some of the guys look the part of the masculine male military stereotype.
High-definition downloads for videos and photos.
Biggest selection of gay models I have seen with around 700.
Large site with over 1,600 scenes.
Cons:
The theme doesn’t work for me.
No 4K, it is owned by Gamma, but maybe length of scenes stops the 4K downloads? Most scenes are over 30 minutes.
Not enough solo scenes
Bottom Line:
This site was recommended to me by a Porn Users member that used to regularly review gay sites. I wasn’t really for sure what to expect when I saw the military theme. That’s how the site works, too. One scene, the guys act very serious and military. The next scene, it seems more like a parody of the military. Can you get anymore parodying than two guys having doggy style on a bed while saluting the flag? I do know this theme is well-liked by gay men. It’s not that I was offended or anything like that. I just thought the change from scene to scene needed to be ironed out some. A little more consistency and either way would be fine with me.
That is a common problem I have on gay male sites. The scenes between guys don’t do much for me. Except the first 5 minutes and last minute. The guys, over 700 of them, are mostly attractive, but there is a lot of differences in their body language and believability about being gay. Most of these are quite convincing.
The solo scenes are easily my favorite and the main reason I join gay sites. This site seems to stray from the Gamma style of sites. The search works, but you only need to click one or two pages to see it’s not very accurate. I search for solo and there are 36 pages of 16 videos that show up. On the second page there are guys having sex. I believe the number of solo scenes is safe to say 250-300. This site has been around so long, some of those are dated 2001. You don’t get the Gamma quality on the videos. The resolution on the older ones has a steep drop-off. I know it’s still updating, but this seems like a site that should come with something else. I know it’s a huge site, but when you figure in the older scenes being very low quality in video resolution, it just looks like they could add this to one or two of their other gay sites. There was a feeling of I spent more money than I received quality videos. That is unusual in the gay genre. Usually you don’t get updates, but the quality is better.
What I noticed the most was the guys in the older scenes are more masculine and there’s more solo in the older scenes. I don’t know if they maybe changed their focus at some point over the last 22 years. I also feel like the site should be larger than it is. The older videos, besides being low video quality, are really short. One I downloaded was 4 minutes. There’s no real consistency in anything on this site except the military theme which does nothing for me. They have one solo video that’s 4 minutes then it goes to a solo video that is nearly 30 minutes. Why didn’t they put them in the room together?
What I am trying to say is I believe the theme is the big draw. I do think this site would score higher for a gay man that is into this theme. And that’s probably why I feel like there should be more. A network gives you multiple themes. You’re just stuck with this one theme. I don’t mean for this to be a negative review. It’s just I may need to stay away from themed gay porn.
The newest videos have from mobile to 1080p downloads. You can download the pictures which are high quality for a gay site. That also makes me think the theme is a major part of the interest in this site. I can still rate it well for doing what it’s supposed to do. Just don’t expect it to go outside the theme. I don’t know that I would recommend it if you don’t like the theme.
Doghouse Digital has some of the best m/m/f bisexual scenes available anywhere.
Almost 1,500 models.
Cons:
The last time I was a member this network was owned by Gamma. It's now owned by Mind Geek, the very group I said I wouldn't join another site from and here I am again.
Good join price of $7.99, add $14.99 if you want to download. This group is terrible for this practice.
ProBiller is the billing processor. You get to either chat with someone that tries to upsell you other memberships or doesn't cancel the account and you get charged for another month. I've got to where I just email a cancellation notice to them and that seems to work, but it's still frustrating to cancel.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined Mile High Media it was for their Bisexual MMF scenes. I would have rated it a 90 or higher back then.
Now, it seems Mind Geek owns the site and they're back to their typical charge extra for downloads nonsense and requiring you to jump through a dozen hoops to cancel through their billing processor. It's hard to explain just how much something this small can completely ruin the user's experience.
I paid the $14.99 extra for downloads. When I was a member before I didn't download anything since I only had a small hard drive in my laptop. I bought an external hard drive a few months ago and wanted to download some of these scenes. What seemed like a good deal ended up costing $23.
The bisexual scenes have not been updated since I was last a member in 2015. It looks like they've made Biempire a different standalone site. At this point, it's like saying "who knows?" There's a surprise around every corner, a new charge, a new promotion for another site and it never ends.
The overall content here is okay, most of it is normal hardcore that you could get from a DVD site. There's very little that stands out.
The newer videos have 4K option if you pay for downloads.
You can't even download the photo sets without paying for the downloads.
The amount of content is impressive at over 4,000 scenes, but the navigation limits how easy it is to find what you're looking for. The categories are vague and limited. If you use the search box you either have to search by model name or scene name, like you're going to know the names of DVDs you've not seen? You can't just search for a category or niche. I searched "bisexual" it only brings up scenes with bisexual in the name, so just "bi" wouldn't show up. Searching "transsexual" brings up nothing, but reducing it to "tranny" brings up a whole series.
Neither bisexual or transsexual/tranny are listed in the categories you can choose from.
They have a good selection of 1,500 professional models, but they are making these sites way too frustrating to use and too hard on the purse to keep joining them. I really don't understand the Biempire part. If you look on TBP, Biempire's review says it comes with "Your membership comes with network access to Mile High Media. Other hot sites include Doghouse Digital, Sweet Sinner and Reality Junkies."
It had 133 scenes at the time of the TBP review and was updating in 2017. On Mile High Media, the newest bisexual scene is 2015 and there's only 79 bisexual scenes. Maybe porn sites should start competing to see who can confuse their customers the most?
I really don't know if it's worth taking the risk to join Biempire. I'm guessing they're going to have the same pay for downloads problem. I now need a filter button to block myself from joining sites ran by Mindgeek.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Can watch on desktop, tablet, mobile, television, smart tv, Apple tv and Chromecast.
Updates from 86 studios.
Huge network with more than 17500 videos, 18,000 photos.
The trusted billers are Segpay or Epoch.
Discounted price from Pornusers.
Multiple updates across the network.
Cons:
It's one of those networks that one month membership is not going to be enough.
Downloads were a bit slower than I am used to and that aids in needing more than one month membership.
Bottom Line:
This network has to be one of the best you can find. They have pretty much everything you could ask for, in large amounts and quality. You can find gay, bi, interracial, gangbangs, amateurs, skinny models, older models both male and female, classy story driven scenes, an award winning hot website and even a good amount of older vintage porn.
With 86 studios it is hard to describe all you get for your membership, which by the way is reasonably priced due to a discount from Pornusers. These are the biggest sites and these I feel are the most interesting. Most sites are updating and the scenes from the last few years are in HD.
BB Videos 422 scenes-German amateur porn, updating Club Sweethearts 7096 scenes-European teens to early twenties, updating Daring Sex 745 scenes-European, very high quality and multiple award winning, updating Elegant Raw 304 scenes- European, excellent quality with many interracial black on white, not updating since last December
Fucking Skinny 542 scenes-European very thin models, updating
Group Sex games 241 scenes-European, lots of gang bangs, oldest videos are of sex games, excellent quality, updating Jim Slip 750 scenes-UK older younger/industry icon where many pornstars have early or even first scenes, updating
Oldie X 498 scenes-European, older/ younger, updating Pornstar Classics 2419 scenes-vintage Rodox 1376 scenes-vintage
Submissed 771 scenes-European, eight bondage/BDSM sites, updating Vintage Classic Porn 434 scenes-vintage Young Busty 1250 scenes, updating
Some other sites that are included on the same themes. For example there is more vintage porn on other sites I did not list, BDSM and sites that focus on older/younger parings of older men and also older women. Some themes don’t have a site that specializes in that, but you can do a network search and find the content. Some examples are anal, blowjobs or lesbian. The ones I felt were the best include of course Club Sweethearts with nearly 7100 videos. These are teen to early twenties European models who are early in their career. I am sure for many this may be their only scene ever. The men they are paired with look to be about the same age, so they look like they possibly could be boyfriend/girlfriend. The same age and type of models are also on Fucking Skinny and Young Busty. The best in overall quality are the scenes on Daring Sex. It has won industry awards for Best Studio, Best Stars, Best Production and Best feature Film.
The member’s page is a bit different and takes some getting used to. It is not too difficult and everything is there that you need. The oldest parts of some of the sites are Standard Definition as they go back to the early 2000’s. The vintage scenes are what they are. This have to have the most vintage porn I have seen anywhere ever.
There are no download limits imposed by the network, but you will need more than a monthly subscription to check everything out. Then, you can take a look at all the streaming only content that is available as a bonus.
Nearly all videos can be downloaded in Full High Definition
It is easy to search
Fast downloads
Cons:
There are no dates on the videos
Alison Tyler has no fan interactions of any kind on the site. There is a link to her Twitter account.
Bottom Line:
I am not a fan of many pornstars, but Alison Tyler is amazing. I am a tall woman and she is taller than I am at nearly six feet. She is larger than nearly all her costars, both male and female. I would describe her as a sexy voluptuous woman who is very physically fit despite being about 170 pounds. She has a great body at 44D-25-35. The standard pornstar is much smaller, even petite,and quite a bit younger. She breaks the mold both with her larger size as well as her voracious sexuality onscreen.
When I was a college student I played sports. Alison rode horses in rodeos, played both college level volleyball and rowed on the crew team. Even now, years later, she goes to the gym seven days a week and is a certified personal trainer. She is a writer of more than 20 sexually explicit novels and hundreds of erotic short stories. Besides that she has a porn career with 300 films and scenes. In 2016, she was nominated for an AVN Award for Best Three Way Sex Scene between a boy/boy/girl. She also has many other industry nominations ranging from sexiest adult star, best boobs, to best porn star website in 2017 for this site. I agree that this site is worthy of an award.
I think her strongest scenes are the lesbian ones. In real life she lost her virginity with another woman before she had sex with a man. Many of her scenes are her solo, showing off her body as well as masturbating. Only a relatively few scenes are her with a guy. All of her scenes are fairly hot and are eye catching. Her many fans will not be disappointed.
The site has 121 videos and 115 photosets, which makes it good sized for a single model site. The review by Rabbits Reviews three years ago has nearly the same count, so I am not confident it is still adding content. Searching is by an easy to use tag system. Nearly all the videos are available in High Definition and the downloads were fast. As part of the 71 site Puba Network, this is worth joining. Of all the sites available there, I found this to be the best.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There is a promo of pay for one month and you get another for free.
You also get three other similar sites. If you like this one, you will like the others.
The site has been active since 2006, so you get 2250 videos and 2700 photo sets. Of course there are many older videos that are not Full HD or 4K.
The download speeds I got surprised me. I didn’t think I could download this fast.
As user friendly a site as any I have ever been a member of.
Cons:
The last update was in December 2021. Is it still updating?
There is not much variety in the types of models. Fantasy level gorgeous models are fine, but could some be a little less perfect?
I think about the videos when I am at work. I keep telling myself that I have a job to do.
Bottom Line:
So many times sites don’t deliver what they promise. This one is the opposite as the quality is much better than I ever expected from a porn site. Before I get into that, there are a few things here that I did expect. The women are Eastern European, so most of them are quite thin. They are quiet in nearly every scene. Unfortunately, the ethnic, age and body type diversity you might get in American porn is just not there. They also have some very recognizable Euro stars who are in many scenes. Apolonia La Piedra has 26 scenes, Gina Gerson has 173, Lady Dee has 7 and Alexis Crystal 96. However there are hundreds of models and most are described as in their first scene or first time with a girl. The awkwardness and natural freshness makes these scenes see very real and unrehearsed.
About half the scenes are described as solo. These were by far my favorites as I felt they allowed the models the opportunity to feel comfortable with letting their sexual sides come out and do so in a eye catching, imaginative and up close and intimate way. You may well guess that most of them are masturbation, but many delightfully naughty scenes featured them as they did yoga, stretched, exercised, danced, or had a fashion show theme, as they changed clothes. There were even some super hot non nudes with teasing.
In the lesbian scenes, I could easily see some awkwardness that was to be expected as many were advertised as first time lesbian sex. But that same awkwardness made for a lot of natural heat that comes from letting out sexual inhibitions and emotions. It came across as that for these models this was a forbidden fantasy that they had thought about, dreamed about, that they had now made real. For us women, finding other women sexy is very natural. If a woman enjoys doing her scene with a partner of either sex, I can identify with her and feel the rhythm as the tension mounts. There was a little bit of toy use, but mostly the scenes had some very passionate romantic kissing on both sets of lips. Part of young innocents exploring is discovering what does or does not work sexually.
In the heterosexual scenes there was oral sex with men in nearly every scene who were about the same age. There was a feeling that the women had fun and the guys were attentive and not so big or rough that there was a question about how the women felt. They liked these guys and the guys seemed to like them. I felt that I could have been watching real couples exploring each other’s bodies. The guys let the women take control of the action and the focus was on female natural beauty. I thought the guys were rather plain and not really all that memorable. This is all Fine Girls after all and women have the spotlight.
I think that there is a lot here to appeal to women. I think guys would like how well the women are showcased and presented. Many sites make the women look glamorous and classy, but in contrast here they just seem oh so pretty and accessible. These are women you might meet and wonder how they look under their clothes or what sex with them would be like. I find a strong appeal to my imagination.
The site is really well laid out and is very simple to use. The video quality is among the best with much of it in 4K, but the site has a banner that says they are remastering some videos to 6K. Wow. I don’t feel a need for that at this time, but you know technology gets cheaper and cheaper the longer it is available. While I am happy with Full High Definition 1080p today, I expect that one day that would be considered inadequate, even old fashioned. If someone makes porn in 6K or better, someone will eventually be buying a new television to watch it on for less than the one I have today. The women are already beautiful, but what will the future technology add to the experience?
You also get three other similar sites that make this a site I would rejoin. For now they are running a sale of pay for one month and get another month for free.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fun take on the massage niche, there are no dicks in it!
Big site with 601 scenes, they update 2 times a month.
All 601 scenes have at least 1080p as their highest resolution, newer scenes add 4K.
English subtitles on the scenes with non-English speaking models.
Includes 5 other massage-themed sites. Some of those have dicks in them.
Oiled up and spread out teenage women makes a woman wonder if those dicks are needed!
Cons:
Some of the scenes have a decent story and passable acting, but some are just quiet until the moaning starts. It can catch you off guard if you’re not expecting the moaning -- believe me, it did me!
I would like to see them update more frequently. Two new scenes a month isn’t much.
Maybe a little more playfulness in the scenes. The scenes almost give me the feeling of taking themselves too seriously.
Bottom Line:
Massage niche is of some interest to me, but not based on the massages I get from the little man at a local mall. It does make these scenes more interesting since I have had massages. It makes the massages more uncomfortable! I start noticing the slight touch of my hair. I need to find a teenage, female masseuse.
The scenes are as varied as the niche allows. The niche being genre (lesbian), niche (massage). They do use creative scenarios. One scene is supposed to be during a business meeting. The masseuse gets under the table while the woman being massaged is sitting at the table with two other women. The masseuse starts with rubbing her feet and legs while the one having this done to her tries to be quiet and look like she is listening to the other two. That’s when the masseuse buries her face between the massaged woman’s legs. It kind of reminds me of the stories on Pure CFNM. There are scenes with more than one woman being massaged. Not that I have any idea what is going to happen in that scenario! I have to watch it.
I am always impressed when all of a site’s scenes have at least 1080p downloads and this one has that. They also offer 720p, 480p, and a couple of smaller mobile resolutions. There is a small downloadable picture set with the scenes it usually has 30-40 photos. What I liked best about the site is the diversity in models. There are some white, some brown, some black, some heavy, some slim and it adds to the experience for me. I also believe the diversity helps make the scenes more modern and seem less repetitive.
There are 601 scenes on the site. You all receive access to 5 other massage-themed sites that at least one of those is probably better than this site. Especially if you prefer male/female, which I usually do prefer.
The site navigates well as long as you don’t mind scrolling. Hopefully, they will keep working those stories into these scenes and maybe even expand them. I would think there is a market for best friends giving each other a massage that turns into cooking breakfast for each other. While their husbands are asleep. I had to throw that in or it was going to be bland. The network is a definite join for those that enjoy massage porn. I have joined a few massage sites in the past and found them to be too similar from scene to scene. This network has 6 different sites including this one to keep that from happening.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hardcore site with creampies and quite a few threesomes.
Pretty European models that don’t speak a bit of English.
Positions that I don’t see a lot in porn that look like should be used more often, visually stimulating.
Seems to be updating on an inconsistent schedule with 1 update in August, 5 in July.
Excellent technical quality and easy to use website.
They have 590 scenes with video, pro photo set and screenshots with each scene.
Cons:
I don’t know why, but once you show me threesomes, the male/female scenes become boring.
A few scenes in newest updates look to be older scenes.
Bottom Line:
I have started watching for the recycling problem in porn and wish I didn’t. It becomes an obsession of looking numbers up and trying to decide if a scene really is new or not. Currently, the 9th newest update doesn’t have a 4K download option and that makes me think it has been recycled from the past. Their own technical superiority causes that. Of their newest 250 scenes, all of the videos have a 4K download option except that one. It makes that one stick out like a sore thumb.
Besides that, this is a really good site if you like creampies. I can’t say I do. I don’t hate them either, but a big turn-on for me when watching porn is watching the guy cum outside the woman. The action itself nearly makes up for it. These scenes are very well edited, produced and there’s a real feeling of heat and passion between the male and female models.
The threesome scenes make the site. It’s hard for me to believe these are not bisexual males with a woman. They are not and there’s no bisexual male action (or score would be higher), but I’m not used to seeing what is two straight males be this passionate with a woman in a threesome unless it’s bisexual males. Very impressed with that part.
The rest of the site has almost no downfalls. There are 590 scenes, right at 250 of those have 4K video downloads and you have to go back to the first 90 scenes to find ones without 720p or 1080p downloads. That gives them 250 scenes with 4K down to mobile and 500 scenes total with at least 1080p and 720p down to mobile. The models are surprisingly attractive to me. I usually do not find European models this attractive, but this studio seems to draw top drawer talent. There’s a lot of anal, some DPs, including dual internal cumshots which is at least something I hadn’t seen before.
The tags are useful, but have questionable accuracy. Which is kind of a letdown as the site is quite large to dig through this many scenes.
I usually don’t comment on the settings, but most of the scenes are filmed in what looks like very upscale houses, possibly hotels and I believe it does add to the quality of these scenes. Do people really go to upscale hotels to have wild threesomes? There are also group scenes with as many as two couples, there are a few foursomes with 3 men, triple penetrating the woman and giving her triple internal cumshots. I believe the most I have seen in one scene was a 3 female, 2 male scene. The scenes are all over 30 minutes and I think once you have 4-5 people in the scene the need for a story goes away.
This is one of the better sites I’ve joined. If they had slipped a few bisexual men scenes in and more outside the body cumshots, I would have scored it even higher. The action itself is about as good as I’ve seen in the male/female world of porn. I will mention just to show much I like seeing bisexual men, a few of the scenes with multiple men with one woman does have the woman touching the penises together. I guess they get tease points with me for that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A lot of slim, shaven, very cute, girl next door type models. Many are pros without their makeup.
2,959 videos, 3,276 photo sets and 435 models.
Averages over 1 update per day, interviews are rare, interviews are rare but are included, also remastered sets of older sets, most are solo and lesbian scenes.
They work on the girl-crush meter with models like Vina Skyy and Allie Addison.
Site is simple to use. Easy to join and cancel.
Photo sets, at times, trump the videos, with extreme close-ups in huge resolution that shows how wet the models are.
Cons:
I find the models to be an overall mixed lot. It's subjective, Vina Skyy and Allie Addison are two of my current favorites, but there are just as many models I don't even check out.
Some of the extreme penetrations take away from the eroticism of the content. Vina has a set where she "whisks" her pussy with a kitchen whisk. It's not solid and it's wiry.
Bottom Line:
This is my second time joining this site. I didn't review it the previous time. I think it's way up there in the teen category and with the slimmer models, but I'm not always in the mood for the cutesy teens.
I decided to join again when I saw they have new content of Vina Skyy and Allie Addison, two models that couldn't possibly be more different, but I have a huge girl-crush on both of them. Vina has 7 videos, including the much anticipated ride on the Sybian and 7 photo sets. Allie has 5 videos and 5 photo sets. They are not the only models I joined for, but when I join a site this big, I try to make sure there are some new sets of my girl-crush models and then look through the archives.
I like that they are remastering old, popular sets as it's helping me find some models I probably wouldn't have looked far enough back to find.
The videos have a broad range of masturbation. Toys, fingers, gynecological tools, kitchen utensils, fruits, vegetables, Sybian, Magic Wands, they should work on getting royalties for these products!
The majority of the scenes are solo and many of the lesbian scenes are only so-so. Others have mentioned the tropical trips and I finally downloaded those. Those are some of the best lesbian scenes I have seen as they look to be improvised. I mentioned in the pros that I believe some of the photo sets are better than the videos. The photo sets are deep and even engaging, some are in the 200 range of photos, others go as high as nearing 400. These are not screen captures and you can tell good care is put into getting the most explicit views.
Something I believe this site offers that others don't is the girls are not all made up, it's not a glamour site even though some sets might look that way. I have seen models on here that I'm familiar with on other sites and realized how much I like them even if I didn't before.
the video quality is great with 4K on newer videos and 1080p or 720p on sets as far back as 2008. The photo sets besides being large in quantity of photos come in zip downloads and in their largest size are 3000x4500, the Vina Skyy photos were enough reason for me to join. I don't think I've ever seen a model that gets so naturally creamy and wet in just a photo shoot.
The cancellation process is as simple as setting your account not to rebill and you also have favorites where you can store your favorite models or scenes. I am happier with the site than I expected to be. I sometimes find these cute model sites to be more annoying than arousing, but they have enough of those cute models that are very good at being arousing to make it a great site. Something I will end with is something I have mentioned in other reviews. I like that they have less than 500 models, but have over 6,000 videos/photo sets combined. It gives you a chance to get multiple sets of the models you like and makes it feel like they are selective about their models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A site that I meant to join multiple times. It’s what I am going to call personal porn. Not really POV, but some of it is.
It’s a good-sized site, but the numbers may be a little off. I have noticed a lot of remastered scenes coming in as new updates.
The models are cute to very pretty. I don’t know how much I believe the amateur part. I recognized a lot of names. There are 568 models.
The remasters include a 4K download option, but I don’t see it on the other new updates. There is a download limit that probably makes it make more sense to download the 1080p or 720p.
A continuing trend I am seeing on more sites, the ability to join through Epoch using Paypal.
Pretty colors in the scenes and backgrounds. They do something with the lighting that causes it to be bright and clear, but soft.
Cons:
This may be an unfair con. I noticed the amount of “new” scenes that are just remastered old scenes. I’m putting it in the cons because of comments left on those videos like, “Wow great scene! Can we see her again?” The watermark says 2007. They’re not making clearly obvious on remasters. Some of those do, but not all and those are counting as updates.
Since I joined, they have updated 4 times (weekly) and 3 of those were remasters. I don’t mind that. I hadn’t ever been a member before. I do want to mention for those that have been a member before.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site and the site I think they also own called Swallow Salon. Amateur Allure probably was a groundbreaking site when it started. The first thing I noticed was the manipulation of lighting. Those bright lights should be a lot harder to look at in a video, but they are either using soft light bulbs or some kind of filter. The action is very clear and there’s no blaring lights in your eyes.
The scenes are mostly the same. The models are supposed to be amateurs and there are 568 of them. Some of them likely are amateurs. Others include ones I know by name like Kiara Cole, Aidra Fox and Adriana Chechik. It could be where the scenes are remastered and maybe they were amateurs at the time.
The scenes stick to a formula which is common for this style of porn. I do believe this is a site that women may like. I have noticed in the comments there are comments about the guy and different guys that are in the scenes. Including seeing a few that said, “He’s hot!” There may be some appeal for straight women and gay or bisexual men. There is a focus on the guy’s dick. I believe if I watched this porn about 13-15 years ago, I would have been very impressed with it.
There is a download limit, but I cannot confirm that. I have not hit it. If you download the 720p or 1080p, I don’t see why you would hit it. It is 25GB per day. I don’t mean to be negative about The Best Porn Review, but maybe things have changed? The review was posted in late February 2022. I read it before joining and could see that there was a lot more to the site than the review said. It makes it sound like this is a blowjob only site. This site has full sex, doggy, cowgirl, missionary and the only part that really highlights the oral is the cumshot. The review also said there are hundreds of 4K blowjob videos. For example, the April 1st, 2022 update does not have 4K download. The remasters do. A lot of the new updates are remasters. Of the last 10 updates, 6 are remasters and 4 are genuine new scenes. None of those 4 have 4K downloads. I do think that matters with a site like this one that has been around for well over 10 years. Some people may not value those 4K remasters, if they have them in a smaller resolution. It also was mentioned as a potential problem with the download limit. Saying the videos average 6GB per scene. I haven’t seen one that is 6GB, even for the 4K option. The 1080p files for these scenes are 1-1.5GB each and the 720p files are 700MB to 1GB. This has thrown me so far off my normal reviewing style. I’m now noticing not all remasters are 4K. My advice is don’t let that be a dealbreaker. I haven’t hit a limit and have downloaded 72 scenes and the photos are worth looking at. They also feature the light manipulation which makes the pictures clearer.
These scenes are near cookie-cutter. Blowjob to start, doggy, missionary, cumshot. I do believe the camera angles and lighting made it groundbreaking years ago. I liked the site well enough to try Swallow Salon too. Good site overall, but it does become repetitive.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The wonders of the incredibly elastic anus – showcased, for better or worse.
There are 711 scenes with updates being inconsistent.
While all of the females are not top-shelf in looks, most are at least attractive.
Seeing women be this rough and kinky with each other. The lesbian scenes were a surprise for me.
Most scenes go up to HD but less than 10 have 4K.
The solo scenes are just behind the lesbian scenes in quality.
Cons:
Do not like the scenes with men. I really am straight. The scenes with men get too rough and Neanderthalic.
Okay, new one for me, there are scenes that not only list it, but have it in the title, “farting”. Not trying to pick on men, but one of those is a scene with a man in it. Neanderthalic.
Bottom Line:
I had viewed a few scenes from this site before, but don’t think I realized how much it is a solo and lesbian site. There are 711 scenes, of those: 298 are listed as lesbian and 80 are listed as solo. I don’t know if it’s just the newer scenes have more emphasis on solo or lesbian and that’s what made me think this was just one of those males punish the female sites or not. Of the newest 60 scenes, only 7 have a man in them. There is a new update this month that has a man in it but would like this site a lot better if they stuck with the solo/lesbian theme.
This site is not for those that are turned off by rough sex or prolapse. I can’t say I like those parts. It does go into my feeling of removing the males. If a woman is masturbating anally and does prolapse or it is doing it rough, it is not so bad, it’s a little worse if it is lesbian and it just becomes unwatchable if it’s a man causing the prolapse. It’s nothing more than I see it as being rough for the sake of being rough. I don’t have problems with regular anal sex between a male and female, but the gimmick of this particular site is the stretching, the gaping and I would rather just see the woman doing that herself. I’m still waiting on that site where we see how far a woman can pull a man’s dick. That’s a fair comparison! It looks like these guys are competing to see which can cause the most destruction.
Some of the lesbian scenes are even erotic and passionate. That’s not what I was expecting. I have looked further back in the updates, and it does look like they changed the style from mostly men with women to solo and lesbian. I probably was a member when it was more of the men with women. I am not known to be turned away by hardcore sex.
The solo scenes remind me more of a woman just testing her ability and pain tolerance. That’s why I would recommend the lesbian scenes over those. The solo can feature large dildos, vegetables, fruits and seems to focus on the woman pushing her limits. The lesbian scenes are more showing of emotions and feelings. Maybe there is trust developed and that helps? It seems to be common for me on this network to only like specific niches within each site. I don’t find many that make me like everything or even 75%.
The video quality is very good. You get at worst 480p, but that is only on the oldest scenes which I wouldn’t recommend anyway. The majority of the scenes have HD (720p and/or 1080p) scenes. The photo sets are okay. I do think these are screen captures. Each set has near 200 in it and each is downloadable.
Lesbian scenes, solo, scenes with men. In that order and it’s a good site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very pretty and young models having anal sex.
213 scenes, uneven updating schedule, sometimes 2 per month, sometimes 1 per month.
Excellent video quality and streaming interface, all videos are downloadable too as are photo sets.
Vendo for the biller.
No download limits that I have ran into.
Navigation works well.
Cons:
These scenes – even with anal – are not that hardcore.
One I usually won’t mention as a female, but the guys on this site are not very attractive.
I think the language barrier causes some problems since these are scenes that look like they need a plot but can’t do so since the models aren’t English speakers.
Bottom Line:
I run into sites like these more than I should. I usually don’t stereotype or have preconceived notions, but my thinking was this site would be at least medium hardcore. I thought that since it has anal in the title. It feels unfair to say this, but a lot of the guys on this site seem very young, inexperienced and even effeminate. Kind of like they are gothic or emo guys. That was a big turn-off for me.
The scenes, as I’m finding with these Russian sites, follow a very strict formula and there’s little to no dialogue I can understand. I speak and write English, four dialects of Hindi, but no Russian!
The quality is very good. All 213 scenes have at least 720p with the majority having 1080p and the newer ones having 4K. There are no download limits, you can also download the photos for each scene.
The female models are very pretty. I just really feel like either there’s a language barrier taking away from these scenes or they just make the same scene with different people from scene to scene. There’s a heavy formulaic feeling, the videos are not very long 20-25 minutes on most. I think I had too high of expectations coming into this site.
I am sure there are some that would like it. A lack of story, dialogue, really a lack of any personality from either the male or female and you end up with what it probably looked like the first time I had sex. Most of these female models would probably be better off in solo scenes. They're not showing much arousal other than seeing a naked guy with a hard dick.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Big name female models considering the niche.
105 scenes currently, 2 updates per month.
Each scene has a photo set you can download and a video.
Curiosity drew me to these sites: I have seen clips that include a bisexual male twist that may go unnoticed.
No 4K, but all scenes have up to 1080p. Is 4K disappearing? Even the newest scenes don’t have it.
Easy to cancel which was important. Didn’t recognize biller, but curiosity was pushing me to join. Cancel was as easy as any site with automated cancel.
Cons:
This specific site really plays to a stereotype of the horny, slutty, MILF that cannot get enough sex. Some of these female models are very pretty 30s – 40s women, they make them look trashy and slutty on this site.
The only thing more of than fake boobs are the ads.
Bottom Line:
I don’t know how many of these sites I will review. The curiosity that was piqued by samples from this site was the obvious straight males, having their dicks rubbed together as the woman gives a double blowjob. I don’t know if I’ve just never paid attention to that. It is something I find arousing. I was able to get a deal around Christmas. There is some dick rubbing going on.
This site is so straightforward there’s not a lot you can say about it. Some of the scenes are threesomes. Those are the best ones. There is no story. Well, I guess there is for the entire site. It’s a older (by porn standards) women that has the fantasy of taking a big, black cock up her butt. There are names I know and as I have told before, I don’t know a lot of models by name. I know these are well-known. There’s Lisa Ann, Simony Diamond, Annisa Kate, these are attractive models.
I’m going to just think about a suggestion. I think this would work better if the guys were younger. Most of the guys look 30s and 40s. That is a problem I have with MILF porn. I see MILF as experienced and seducing younger men. I mean no offense to the guys in the scenes. They seem really happy to be in the scenes. No seduction was needed. The women do make or break these scenes. You can see that all of the women are capable of handling dual penetration. That is the part that saves this site. Lisa Ann and especially Simony Diamond, they are making me feel like they not only enjoy this, they could add a few more guys. I mentioned the part that interested me. That is power games. I do like the scenes where the woman not only is up for the challenge but seems to want even more of a challenge.
I don’t know why there’s not 4K. The newest update was January 25, 2022. The scenes have 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. There are picture sets you can download. I would recommend not reading the synopsis for each scene. The stereotypes are beat to death on this site. If you’re into anal, MILF, dual penetrations. There is content you will like. You have to have tempered expectations. The ads are the best way to end this review. This site is part of Analized. Analized is part of Full Porn Network. Those are somehow related to Porn Force and those are related to James Deen’s site. I thought I was getting all of them. Instead, I only got 6 anal sites. I will have to figure out which one gets the sites I was wanting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site that led me to join this network all because of one scene. Please read my comment in the Bottom Line about Analized. The information is incorrect on The Best Porn and left me with a network of very little of what I expected.
Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor in the scene “Slut Training”. Wasn’t as good as I expected, but it was enough to get me to join the network.
High quality downloads, unless I missed one, all scenes have up to 4K.
Downloadable picture sets and they’re not bad, could use a boost in resolution at on 1920x1280
Some of the scenes are pretty good, especially the ones with more than 2 people.
Cons:
This network is part of a network that is part of a network. Nothing I found before joining told me of the sites I was not going to have access to or told me exactly of which sites I had access to. I don’t know if they changed the way their network(s) work, but The Best Porn listing hasn’t been updated since the change. Please look into that.
It's man porn. What do I mean? It’s more about the guy’s ass and balls than anything else. I don’t hate this type of porn. It just seems like such a waste to have a beautiful model only to focus on how far the man can stretch her ass open.
Bottom Line:
I am going to put the explanation here of the problem with Analized as a network. They also own Porn Force, Full Porn Network and James Deen. Reading The Best Porn review, it lists 14 sites that come with Analized. Those included the sites I was interested in DTF Sluts, Big Daddy POV, Your Mom Does Porn and POV Perverts. I have access to NONE of those. I have access to Anal BBC, Anal Amateurs, this site Anal Violation, Your Mom Does Anal, Teenage Anal Sluts, Her Gape and Homemade Anal Porn. That is 7 of the sites listed on The Best Porn listing. I’m not as upset as it may seem. It’s just I’m not really into anal, at least not this much and I had to join their other network to get sites that I thought came with Analized.
This scene with Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor was what made me interested. Add those sites I thought I was included, and I thought I had found a really good deal. It was $10 on New Years Day. The scenes on this site are a little more creative than the previous site I reviewed from this network. There does seem to be more of a setup and story with the scenes. The woman wants to try anal. Different objects are used to prepare her. The sex is okay. It is just the focus of the camera that becomes annoying. I get that anal sex is probably difficult to record unless maybe POV. But the constant view of a hairy ass and balls flying around just doesn’t help my feeling towards porn like this.
That is why the scenes with more than 2 people are the ones I like. The camera has to pick everyone up or bounce around by couple to couple and doesn’t get stuck in that one view. Maybe I am being too critical when I say anal sex is not the most camera-friendly sex. One scene on here comes to mind, the woman on her back and the guy squeezing her legs together. Good, creative positioning for the couple since squeezing the legs together causes the anus to open more. All I can see as a viewer is the woman’s legs squeezed together, about ¾ of the man’s dick and nothing else. I can’t even see the penetration.
On the positive side, it has 141 scenes, acceptable photo sets and the videos can be downloaded from 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The group scenes are quite good. The scenes are even long. Some even over an hour, especially when more than 2 people. That’s my way of saying they should just do away with the one on one anal scene. If you’re going to be wild and kinky add a few more couples in there. It’s an okay site on an okay network, as long as you know which sites you’re going to receive. There are a lot of ads for their other sites. From the looks of it those sites used to come with Analized, they then split it up and didn’t tell anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that.
Cons:
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground.
Bottom Line:
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large, hardcore site focused on anal sex.
854 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Up to 4K video downloads on newer scenes.
Each scene has a professional quality downloadable photo set.
The models are professionals and most are European. The average model on this site is at least attractive.
Cons:
Hopefully, you are just on the site for the porn/sex. This site has little to no plot to the scenes and very little talking or set up.
At least for me, the guys are a mixed bag when it comes to attractiveness. It could be the European part.
Scenes are long which is usually a pro for me, but with no story or set up, the length is just a show of the long, I would even say dullness of the content.
Bottom Line:
Asshole Fever is a site that I believe is love or hate. If you absolutely love anal sex and no story, it may satisfy you, but for me the site falls short.
On the technical side of things they do everything right. The newer scenes have video downloads from 140p to 4K. Those can also be streamed in a streaming player that works well. The picture sets are even good quality, around 150 photos per set and high resolution or low resolution download zips. The site works well, but when your content is this narrow of a niche, there isn’t a lot of work needed to keep the site from being confusing. You’re going to get basic, shallow, anal sex in each scene. I usually don’t look into European sites. My little experience with porn tells me European sites are often too straightforward (which may not mean shallow to you) and to the point. There needs to be more to keep my interest and attention.
The female models are attractive and if I could give the site a positive comment about their content, most of this is not violent, or ultra-hardcore anal. Some of the scenes even remind me of what other PU reviewers describe as heartcore.
The site is large with 854 scenes and they are updating -- not on a perfectly set schedule, but do average 2 updates per month. I believe once a site has over 500 scenes they are getting into the area of there’s going to be overkill when the scenes don’t vary much. That is what plagues this site for me. I have nothing against anal sex and have joined and enjoyed anal sites before, but without much communication between the actors, the lack of a story, there starts to be too much working against the site. I even wonder if the one on one aspect of the content hurts it for me. That I have seen there is not even a threesome scene. It’s all one on one and that does create a dilemma for me. Maybe I am thinking the anal genre, it should be more raunchy, or more hardcore, but it’s just not. The scenes are plain and I want to believe a less mainstream act like anal should be more than plain.
This may not even be a negative about the content itself. I usually do not like sites that find one set niche or genre and just do it to death. You can see the negative puzzle coming together. No story, no talking, anal, anal, anal, nothing raunchy or kinky, every scene, over and over. I won’t go that low on the score since I do believe my subjective opinion is hurting the score. The site does most everything right except for parts that I don’t like. It could be okay for others, then the high quality content would be a major pro. For me, I have seen better anal sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The director allows the models to act spontaneously.
There are weeks of planning and discussions with the models that take place before the scene happens.
BDSM forum where you can offer ideas for scenes.
The site has exclusive content that is very creative. (See below)
You see some of the biggest names in BDSM porn. They don’t shoot models that are not seriously into the BDSM lifestyle and they don’t work with talent agents unless they have experience representing BDSM models.
There are interviews with the models, both before and after the scenes and also clips of them doing hobbies such as making pasta or working out. These models make you feel you know them.
Cons:
There are more models on the site besides those listed.
If you want 4K there is a more expensive option.
The site has been updating recently at one a month, which is average for rare specialty porn.
Bottom Line:
BDSM porn is about domination and submission, a power transfer between consenting adults. It is a lifestyle for serious participants who live out the fantasies. Most of what passes for BDSM in porn is not much like what those who do these things in their personal lives actually do. On this site you have an invitation to see a world that you may never witness otherwise.
In contrast, this site has real male dominants who are paired with women who authentically want to submit on camera. you can see it in their eyes as well as their facial expressions. There is a lot more than rough anal sex going on here; there is crazy, demented, challenging bondage. Many scenes have humiliation, both verbal and physical, as well, giving you the feel of authenticity. Weeks before a scene is shot, the attention Is focused on making the scenes as creative and engaging as possible. The models are asked for input as to what they want to do and each scene is based on the model’s unique personality. Here you find scenes that are individually hand crafted.
Most porn sites have models that you have seen on many sites before, but here the approach is different. There are many attractive models on this site, but the focus is on their performances more than their looks. If a model does well, she gets more scenes. The site says that they will interview models, but don’t want subs who are into this just for the money.
A few mainstream performers are to be found here, such as Casey Calvert. In the last few years, they have worked with some superstars of BDSM porn and a few I think who are exclusive to this site. One I have seen on other sites is Rebel Rhyder, a beautiful superstar who would do well on a glam model site. You would not believe she would do these things. I swear there is no sex act or BDSM scenario that is more than she can handle and handle like the ultimate pro that she is. Included in her five scenes are a three hour gangbang that is nonstop, sadistic, anal insanity. The idea was hers and I could not believe what happened in that scene. Hint, it has four doms, two male and two female.
Another big name BDSM star is Charlotte Sartre. I have seen her on a few other sites, but her fifteen scenes here are collector’s items, true BDSM classics. Her specialty is degradation and my favorite one of her scenes is Rim Jobs For All. She recites a script with praise for how much she likes to give rimjobs, all while doing, guess what? Rimjobs to two doms.
As is common on BDSM sites, the models have interviews both before and after to tell you the scene was consensual fun for them. Six of the models have one minute clips of them showing their non porn hobbies. They come across as ordinary people who happen to like BDSM, so you can feel you they are relatable. These are not some strange group of perverts; they are women who cook, work out or make crafts. Some don't even wear makeup.
The bondage is some of the most interesting that I have ever seen. There are many kinds of rope use, but also there are many different devices and props. Think plastic bins or masks as examples. The positions most models are in are often visually impactful and the models happily endure discomfort for long periods. The sex is mostly anal, but there is a lot of female on male rimming, ass to mouth and a lot of oral that is quite forceful. I like that the scenes are unscripted and the reactions of the models comes across as quite spontaneous. Despite the videos being extreme, the models seem to be friends who are interacting without being mean, they are just friends that have a shared interest.
The same company has two other BDSM sites, Slave Mouth and Dom the Nation. I liked both of them, but this is not a network. The models who are willing to make these scenes are by definition rare, the ideas complex, the filming very intense, as well as time consuming to edit. Many scenes are well over an hour and some are so long that they are split into parts. After you join you see a link for joining each additional site at a discount.
If this interests you, this is well worth a premium price. Did I forget to say they have 234 videos ?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A glorious tribute to the always growing stepfamily niche of porn!
188 scenes with updates coming in every 3-4 days.
Pretty girls and settings that will make you believe these are barely legal girls.
Jerk Off Instruction scenes included, I believe these scenes could be the easiest way for straight women to get into watching a solo woman.
Not a lot of download options, but they do have 480p, 720p and 1080p
Navigation is good and site includes access to the Full Porn Network.
Cons:
I have admitted I like perversion, but there are some of these settings that are going to push your button for, "is that going too far?"
Site is a little cluttered with 3 ads across the top and 4 across the bottom.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to explain the settings part since it made me laugh, but may be a little too perverse for some. Some of the scenes happen in an all-pink bedroom. There are stuffed animals, glittery curtains, all the stereotypical items you would expect to see in a little girl's bedroom. They do go out of their way to point out all their models are 18 or older and they do not condone incest. Part of the scenes are Jerk Off Instruction. I wouldn't say I have had any problems being attracted to watching young women masturbate, but for some women there is a stigma that comes with watching other women masturbate. I do think these Jerk Off Instruction scenes directed at men, can be an easy introduction to porn for women who are not used to watching it. I do believe most women had at least one moment in their life where they thought about teasing a guy and talking him step by step through how she wants him to masturbate for her. I could be wrong, but I have introduced the niche to other women and they like it too.
The other scenes are filmed from a POV orientation of the Bad Daddy. Who is supposed to be the stepdad having sex with his stepdaughter. I do think this site does this style of porn very well. Most of the stepfamily sites I have joined and even liked use humor or unbelievable stories to show you it's not real. This site doesn't. Since you don't really see the stepdad it's more about seeing the young woman looking seduced, curious and aroused by this charming older man. I like it.
They are nearing 200 scenes. These scenes each come with a small photo set you can download and the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. It's a simple site and that's not a bad thing. The biggest reason I returned to this site and network was I saw where they had a new Karma Rx scene and she's probably my favorite. I noticed rearadmiral's comment about the age of the models being too high to fit the stepdaughter role and can see that, even with Karma Rx who I believe is late 20's. I guess we just have to use a little more suspension of belief and figure the mom's a cougar with a younger husband!
The scenes while lacking the humor of a site like Family Strokes, there are times I do find myself laughing. Whether it's bad acting or really bad use of words. They do push the serious side of the site, but not as much as all their disclaimers make you expect. The site and network is worth a try. There is a lot of good content on the site and network. This site is the reason I came back. I do think it's interesting that I know more women who like the Jerk Off Instruction scenes more than the number of men that do. Recommended for those that like a little perversion in their porn.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The biggest, most overwhelming porn site I have ever joined.
132,436 scenes and they update with at least 12 scenes per day.
18,144 models, that's a small city.
Their original series scenes are quite good.
45,107 of the scenes are available in HD quality and 1,613 of the scenes are available in 4K.
Somehow this monstrosity of a site has good navigation.
No problems using the biller that others have experienced according to the comments here.
Cons:
Maybe I should quit my job? This is like a mountain of porn came crashing down on my computer.
The size of this site very well could be its biggest con. I am using the category filter to at least find some content I want, but the pages and pages of scenes is just frustrating.
Bottom Line:
I was looking for a site with a little bit of everything. A little bit. This site has a whole lot of everything. Some of the less popular niches I like have these totals:
395 bisexual scenes which is more than 90% of the bisexual standalone sites I have joined. They make that and my point even clearer when they show me they also have a bi-sexual category with 14 more scenes.
1,285 "shemale" scenes. What I do like about their search engine is you can click shemale, it brings up the 1,285 scenes. You can then click solo and it searches within the 1,285 shemale scenes and shows 44 of them are solo.
Niches that are usually very uncommon are common on this site. The Voyeur category brings up 1,419 scenes. They even have 1,787 compilation scenes.
While I did find a lot of scenes to download in the above specified favorite categories, it's their Original series that sets them apart for me. They have 12 of these Original series. These scenes have high production value, but it looks like they have stopped releasing many of them. It could be due to the Pandemic, but it's still disappointing.
The video quality does vary the further back you go, but most of what I have watched is at worst 480p and are decent quality. I am not as much into the technical parts. Most of my interest porn started with Vivid, bisexual scenes and males masturbating. Most of those are in 480p quality or standard definition.
The problem with the older scenes is I am thinking these are just from DVDs and a lot of them are not interesting. One of my main reasons for joining this site was the content I used to get from Tainster. This site has 36 DVDs of Party Hardcore content. These DVDs are broken into parts which was the only disappointing part about finding them here. The Party Hardcore site also breaks the performances into multiple parts which can be difficult to watch as they change camera angles from scene to scene. When combined with all the bisexual content and transsexual solo content, it makes this site a very good value for me. I just wouldn't want to be a member trying to find something without knowing what you're looking for. The navigation is handled by just clicking boxes. It works well, but the categories are often vague and unless you know exactly what to type into the search box, like "Party Hardcore", I believe you could spend a month just looking for the content you want. I don't see this as a site I will return much, but it was good for finding some specific content I was looking for.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Sexy hardcore action with very pretty girls.
102 scenes with a new scene added every month.
As the name suggests, the video quality goes up to 4K on all scenes.
Each scene comes with a downloadable photo set.
Videos are downloadable and there are no limits.
Epoch is the biller.
Cons:
The scenes are a little on the plain or vanilla side.
The guys in the scenes are annoying.
Too much camera love from the models that seem more interested in looking at the camera than having sex. That may be a personal one. These girls are very pretty and they know it. They stare at the camera.
Bottom Line:
You have two major selling points with this site. The models look young (18-22), they are very pretty and the video quality is exceptional. The sex isn’t bad. The models just seem like they would be better off in solo videos. In one scene, the very pretty model is in a cowgirl position. The cameraman is filming from behind to show her very nice butt and she’s turning her around looking at the camera. I do think that is a weakness I see in a lot of hardcore scenes. She would probably be an incredible solo model with all that eye contact with the camera.
One model is getting her toes sucked and is looking at the camera on the other side of the room. There has to be a better show of connection between the male and female for me to really enjoy hardcore scenes.
The site isn’t huge with only 102 scenes and it’s not going to become huge with only one update per month. They have another 8 years before they reach 200 scenes. I don’t think it’s a Covid-19 problem either. It looks like they have released an average of 1 scene per month since 2018. There are a few months with two updates, but there also are a few months with no new scenes.
The scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. The videos have these download options: 404p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have 4K even on the oldest scenes from 2015.
The scenes have very little story or dialogue, but they do try to work some fetishes and different niches in. There is a massage scene, some foot fetish, young and old, they’re at least trying to give the viewer something to work with. I listed plain/vanilla in the cons. What I mean by that is the scenes are very similar from scene to scene even if they work a fetish in or a different niche.
The feeling I get from this content is they know the models are very pretty and the video quality is high quality so that’s enough. It’s not enough. The dorkiness of the guys trying to get themselves on camera too is annoying. The acting itself is acting. The girls jump back and act surprised to see a dick. The guys are just jumping in front of the camera. I see the models as ideal solo models since they wouldn’t see a dick to be surprised by and they wouldn’t have a guy hogging the camera lens. It just isn’t the type of hardcore porn I like. It could be for others since you do have the two big selling points to think about.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
