Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Cuckoldest
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This one hit two of my fetishes: cuckolds and older men
There are only 28 scenes at this point. They are only updating once per month.
Good enough scenarios, the titles kind of tell you what the scenes are about.
Excellent video quality and unlimited downloads.
Some bisexual parts with the men.
The models are all attractive except that little slim, young guy. |
| Cons: |
It’s a small site and it is not going to grow very fast at one update per month. This is a site they should be focusing on.
Any cuckold scene has the feeling of it’s not a real couple and that does hurt some believability. |
| Bottom Line: |
The basis of this site is like most cuckold sites. The difference is most cuckold sites have people of similar age. This one does not. This has older husbands with wives that look late 20s to late 30s and they get the believable cuck story. She tells her older husband, she is young and horny, he is not satisfying her. He doesn’t want to lose his younger, sexy wife, so he finds a young stud to have sex with her while the husband watches or videos (that’s more in real-life, I think). I have never seen a cuckold site that truly portrays the cuckold properly. The way the cuckold is shown is fundamentally correct. They almost always show the cuckold as submissive and weak. I have worked in the field that covers this and it’s not a true representation. It’s okay for 3 out of 5 scenes. The other two need to be the male being dominant, even as he shares his wife. He is receiving an adrenaline rush and competitive boost by watching his wife with another man. It seems like porn would love shooting that style, but they do not.
There is one guy that is in most of the scenes. He’s a handsome guy, bearded, muscular and well-endowed. The scenes with the much older husbands are easily the best. I believe a man’s ego lowers as he gets older. He may enjoy watching his young wife have sex. They have one of my favorite older male porn stars, his name is John M. I find him very attractive for the old “porn” role. The younger guy that is in most of the scenes has the stereotypical name of Peter Stallion. That makes me laugh just to type.
The part I am glad I looked at KayTBuffs review to see, there is bisexual parts between the men. Porn does not realize that ends the cuckold part. If the husband is bisexual, it’s a bisexual threesome. They also have the older guy that is in many older/younger scenes Dirty Gunther, he’s okay, I think he is getting close to being too old. He gives his all in his performances, but you can see he is probably going to pump his last breath out of him.
I don’t know if it’s because these are Europeans. The young men in these scenes seem to be very comfortable with the bisexual parts with the older men. That is something I like a lot about this network. The scenes are fun and happy. You see smiles and thumbs up. I think this site reaches as broad of an audience as any site could. The gay porn fans I know love the daddy/son, you get that. You get the sharing. You get older/younger, bisexual, if they add a transsexual they have everything covered.
This site will be one I will keep an eye on and plan on downloading the one new scene per month. The newest scene on it is probably the best for straight men. The woman is very attractive. I do think this is part of the future of porn. If you look at amateur sites the cuckold, the bisexual man, it is all becoming more common. I reviewed a site earlier about older women that was updating 4 times per month. If that could do that on this site, I believe they could have a real winner on their hands. I know that most straight guys won’t agree, but there is something sexy to me about seeing a younger man having sex with a younger woman, while her older husband licks both of them, at the same time.
Very recommended just for the various niches it covers. |
|
01-12-22 08:48am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Cum Bang
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
More interracial gangbangs, this time it’s white guys with one black woman.
Only 95 scenes, but they do include a video and photos.
Hasn’t updated since January 2020.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
105 female models which surprises me since I didn’t notice any scenes with more than one woman.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
No updates hurts what is already a relatively small site.
Playing racial stereotypes in the older scenes including all the guys wearing shirts with confederate flags on them.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
The story in the older scenes is almost always the same, the black woman’s black husband cheated on her so she’s getting revenge by gangbanging a group of white men -- including some that are much older.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
I believe a site like this one has more potential than the black guys on white woman gangbang sites do simply because you don’t see the group of white guys having sex with a black woman gangbang very often.
The racial stereotypes they play in the early scenes could possibly offend some people. The guys wear a shirt (some even have socks) with a confederate flag on it and the shirt says, “Dixie Stud - I would take one for the flag”. That follows the earlier setup of those scenes of the black woman’s black husband cheating on her. They did seem to drop the shirts (and socks) after a year of using it.
The scenes are still repetitive. They do seem to get a few scenes where maybe the woman is really into one of the guys and doesn’t switch. She will have sex with one guy for nearly the whole scene or half the scene while giving blowjobs and handjobs to the others. A lot of the older scenes are also very short considering there are 6-7 people in the scene, some as short as under 20 minutes. The newer scenes average more in the 30-40 minute range and there are some really pretty black women in these scenes.
I don’t know if they get much credit for the story since it doesn’t change much from scene to scene. The newer scenes have generic stories. I thought the best scene was Nia Nacci. She is having her 19th birthday and her white boyfriend walks in with a cake. She makes a wish and tells him what she wished for (19 cocks). The boyfriend motions and 18 more guys walk in.
You do get 1080p and 720p downloads on the majority of the videos and I liked this one a little better than most of the other sites just because of the different dynamic. |
|
02-26-21 05:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I thought I might like based on me liking a site that had dildos squirting fake cum on women.
316 scenes total and they are listing updates, but there were 276 scenes on the site in 2015.
Newest videos are 1080p, no other download options other than downloading the scene in parts.
This usually lands in the cons, but the scenes are short and it’s a pro.
Photos of the models posing with downloads. |
| Cons: |
This will be the first time I ever listed this as a con, the women. There are some average looking women on here and they are the best looking women on the site.
There’s not even humor involved despite the fake cumshots.
The women trying to act like the cum is real.
The edit in every scene where I assume the male attaches or connects the cum squirter.
The older scenes are 480p |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined a site a while back called Slime Wave. I thought I would hate it, it has dildos shooting large amounts of cum on the women. I liked it. I thought this site would be similar. It’s not. This site instead of having strategically placed squirting dildos, just has a man getting a blowjob, then he says he’s going to cum. The woman moves back, there is a video edit, and the continuous flood of cum squirts “out of his dick”. As much as I enjoyed Slime Wave, the site which is similar in its gimmick, seemed to lose my interest when the edit happened. I am not for sure if the man has some sort of sprayer he is squirting the fake cum from, but do believe that is what I didn’t like about this site. With Slime Wave, the fake cum was being shot out of fake dicks (dildos) with no man in sight. With this site, a real man with a real dick, is shooting fake cum out.
I have been a member of two different sites with clear edits in their scenes. I believe that may be the most off-putting action possible in a porn scene.
The site is large with 316 scenes, but I didn’t find myself interested in watching more than the ending to see if all the scenes have the obvious edit. From the ones I watched they all had the same edit right before the cumshot. I don’t understand the thinking behind this or the arousal for the viewer. It’s like watching a reality show only to find out it’s fake on the last episode. When one of my pros is the “scenes are short” it probably isn’t a good sign. Most of the scenes I watched, you can’t see the time on the scenes until you start watching/streaming or download them, were around 7 minutes. These look like they could just use the content from their other sites for the first 95% of the video, throw the edit in and introduce the gimmick of the real dick shooting gallons of fake cum. I wasn’t going to review this site until I noticed the dates on the scenes do show the site as updating weekly. I have read various member reviews about this network recycling their content and based on the The Best Porn review there were 276 scenes in 2015. There are only 316 scenes in 2021, but they show weekly updates. I am sure if there were weekly updates there would be far more updates in 6 years than 40.
I do find the site to be a negative on what is at best -- an okay network. The women try to act their way through the scenes on this specific site. They try to act like the fake cum surprises them and excites them. It has too much of a parody feel to the site. Which represents the biggest problem this site causes the entire network. The women on this site “act” like they do in their other scenes on the network. I also have now found my most disliked part of porn, an obvious edit in a scene.
The women on this site are average looking at best. There really isn’t anything that positive about this site other than network access. This site combined with their newer sites in the network makes me think a full network review will be sufficient instead of reviewing all the sites in the network. If you are familiar with Slime Wave or any of the sites that use fake cum shooting from dildos, do not believe this site has the same appeal. The sites with dildos shooting fake cum look more like a fetish and go into the Wet And Messy niche. This site fits the edited and should have been scrapped -- niche. Maybe they have scrapped it, but showing that it’s still updating weekly only makes it worse. This is one of my lowest scores for an individual site. |
|
05-11-21 03:43pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
54
|
Cum For Cover
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site about a lot of cumming men and the women willing to try and use their faces and mouths to catch it.
This is going to appeal to those into “almost” bisexual men.
It’s also going to appeal to those that like watching women see how fast they can make multiple men cum.
There are 98 scenes and I have a feeling I will download all 98 (something I usually don’t do)
Very pretty women for this type of porn. I even knew a couple (Veronica Leal and Anastasia Brokelyn) |
| Cons: |
It seems to be a trend with this group. There are scenes from pre-2008, a large space of nothing, then the scenes started back, causing some inconsistency in the quality.
No new updates in 10 months. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start with why I said this could appeal to “almost” bisexual male fans. Some of these women aren’t messing around. You stick 5-6 dicks in their face and they’ll stick two, even three of them in their mouth at the same time. You also get the part probably only women notice like when the one guy cums really hard and it hits one of the other guys on accident. Talk about having to work in a dangerous environment.
What impresses me most is the length of these scenes. Most are at least 40 minutes long. That means these women are most likely going through these 5-8 guys without any editing and getting all 5-8 of them off. It’s impressive especially when you see how pretty some of the models are. They do not look like they should be in this type of porn. They look more like they should be in softcore porn, being feminine and pretty. But here they are swapping 5-8 dicks in and out of their mouths and hands. A few of the older scenes do have two women in them instead of just one. I believe there’s a market for this niche. There are the women like me who wonders what it would be like to have this many men standing nude in front of me and there are the men who maybe fantasize about being in a group of men having their way with a beautiful woman.
I am going to mention the picture sets. These are professional quality photo sets that focus on the model. Those make for a good footnote to the scenes. Just when you’re watching her weave her way through the web of dicks, look back at her clothed picture and how pretty and even innocent she looks.
I think this site more than any from this group leaves me wanting more. I have watched these types of scenes from other studios, but these are really good, even the poorer video quality old scenes. These sites could really get away, at least with me, with focusing on remastering their older videos instead of worrying about new updates. The content is that good.
You get 98 scenes, there is enough inconsistency in the video quality, I can’t even put a number on how many scenes have 1080p and 720p, I can say 19 have 4K, 1080p and 720p, just glancing over the rest it looks like half of the scenes have 720p and 1080p, those have the little HD badge on them, but they’re mixed up so maybe they have been doing some remastering.
It’s a niche I believe has more potential than the porn companies seem to believe. It’s another site that I won’t score too high since it does look like they’re not going to update anymore, but will score high enough to say give it a look. |
|
09-07-21 04:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Rare, at least to me, amateur porn from India. I am from India.
Pretty models wearing traditional Indian clothes and jewelry
It feels like a con, but 158 scenes of authentic amateur porn from India is a lot.
Long scenes with most being over 30 minutes.
Maybe it’s the amateur part, but there’s more kissing, touching, and build-up than most hardcore scenes I’ve watched recently. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure the appeal, even the taboo of these scenes are evident to those not from India.
While these are older scenes, it seems like the video quality should be better than 480p tops.
No pictures, would have been interesting to see more of the clothing, jewelry to see all the taboos being touched on.
I am putting this as a con even though I see it as a pro. There are cumshots, facials, the site is listed as creampie. |
| Bottom Line: |
Finding porn from with real amateurs from India is not easy to do. You can find solo models from India on some of the more glamour sites, but hardcore, in traditional Indian clothing, is what I’m going to call very rare.
This is an older site with no updates, but I hadn’t ever seen it. If you look online you will see how rare any Indian porn is. Finding a site with 158 scenes is not really exciting, but more intriguing. One complaint that really jumps out at me. The women -- possibly being “amateurs” look at the camera way too much. Even in cowgirl position, looking back over their shoulder at the camera. I would even call that distracting from the scenes. I would have liked pictures too. While you can see the women’s clothing and jewelry at the beginning of the scenes they do not stay dressed very long. A lot of the taboo potential has to do with the clothing being on while at least some sexual act is being performed.
I cannot tell you if all these models really are from India. There are several different subcultures of Indian people. A few of the models do look more Romany to me. And we will have a geographical, racial argument discussion on our hands if we get into whether Romany people are Indian -- the Romany are officially considered Aryan-Indo.
The sex itself is quite good. There’s kissing, it’s very inspiring to see an Indian woman grabbing a hard penis while kissing a man. Traditional ways in India put the woman in the extreme submissive role. I do get the feeling most of these women are amateurs and one big reason I say that is they look confused, maybe uncomfortable if they guy pulls out to give them a facial. They do not open their mouths and turn their faces to the side. The men do not look to be Indian, at least not all of them. At least a few of the scenes are even titled, “White Boys and Indians”. This doesn’t really matter either way to me. It does bring another part into question, most of these women have trimmed pubic hair, that’s not really common in India, but I also notice very few tattoos, which is more common in India.
It would help if the women talked. I could tell if they were speaking Hindi. There’s not much talking, but there is a lot of moaning and the sex itself is the strongest part of the site. It’s very believable for porn.
From what I can tell these scenes are taken from DVDs. They are numbered with the same title like, “White Boys and Indians scene #1”. That does mean the quality of the video is not even average in 2021. They give you four download options from 160p to 480p. The 480p is really better watched in a media player that has a “large” mode or one that lets you select the percentage of your monitor’s screen the video fills. I found using PotPlayer, a media player I hadn’t heard of before, works best with the 480p. You can set it to fill 50% or 75% of your screen giving you a bigger resolution than 480p, but not trying to stretch it out to 1080p.
I believe my opinion on this site is probably a little too high since I understand the taboos and know the rarity of finding this many hardcore Indian scenes on one site. I am still limiting my score. I like it more than my score shows. If you are interested in women from India it is definitely worth checking out. If you’re not into women from India, you probably won’t make it beyond the poor resolution quality of the videos. |
|
07-13-21 09:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Czech Hotties.com
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nice size library of 126 videos and photosets.
However, the TBP review in 2011 mentions over 130.
Beautiful Eastern European models, thin and many are blondes.
The models are introduced stripping from nice clothes. I loved the sexy shorts for example
Easy searches for content
Part of 71 site PUBA network
The orgasms seem real and not faked |
| Cons: |
The scenes are not dated. The one listed as most recent is Standard Definition 640x480.
Low quality small photos. I saw the measurements for one as 1000x666. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like solo masturbation sites of all kinds, both male and female. If someone is having fun getting off, I can imagine myself witnessing or participating right along with them. I joined the Puba network for a few of their sites and this was one I had hoped would be one of their better ones. The women are uniformly young, pretty, thin and sexy to a fault. The scenes start with the model stripping to nude from ordinary street clothes. The outfits were not exotic or designed for a porn scene. No lingerie or stripper clothes are to be seen. Many of them are wearing short shorts and these showcase their legs. In many cases I saw enhanced breasts and those I don’t like.
In the scenes have the models use fingers to get them off. In most videos there are dildos and in some there are other toys. At this point I must stop and explain. These are old videos by porn standards. I saw only Standard Definition videos and the quality a mere 640x480. That would date these scenes as pre 2010, as around then we started to see High Definition. In 2011 the review by The Best Porn mentions there were over 130 videos and today there are 126. At the time these videos were new, there were nowhere near the quality or variety of sex toys we have now. No wands are on the site, in fact there is not a single battery either.
Given that limitation, the action is both oral and anal. Some scenes have a dildo in her mouth, simulating oral sex. Some scenes have the expecting vaginal insertion, but others also have anal insertions. I saw some ass to mouth and a lot of dildo licking too. In a few scenes there is a double penetration that was a visual treat. Further, there are some large dildos, but not extremely large, some are black and some are white. There are a few lesbian scenes too. They use fingers, dildos and toys on each other, but they also use tongues.
Although there is no talking, which is common in Eastern European porn, there was quite a bit of moaning and other noises that did not sound fake or just acting. I think these women got off on what we witnessed.
If I were writing this in 2011, this would get a higher score. In spite of this being part of a large network, the low quality is a deal breaker. I love the concept and wish new, more high quality updates were coming. |
|
09-07-21 05:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Deeper
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I knew I would eventually find a hardcore, dark, artsy combination site.
Excellent production values, some scenes tie together and the scenes are long (some over an hour).
The model list isn’t huge, but they have 116 models that are all I would think in the top 10% of models in looks. All are pros as far as I can tell.
There are 163 scenes and they update 4 times a month.
The video quality is maybe the best I have seen. It could even be overkill. The file sizes are huge. Picture sets are also downloadable and very professional.
Probably the best alternative to Pure Taboo. Even tops Pure Taboo in some ways.
Easy site to use, but they push their upsells of their other sites in ads. |
| Cons: |
They limit you to 25 downloads per week and that limit starts on day 1 of your membership. If you don’t download any scenes in your first week as a member you just lost 25 downloads. If it was 100 per month it wouldn’t be a big deal since they do only have 163 scenes, but they are limiting you to 25 per week. It’s not as bad as it sounds.
As good as the production values are there is a sameness that creeps into the scenes. They do have scenes that are part of series that do not fall into sameness. Those are produced by semi-retired model Kayden Kross.
They show you what looks like good deals on upsells, but don’t show the price until you click to upgrade. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is exactly the type of site I look for. There’s creativity, story, there’s hardcore sex, they list it as passionate sex with light kink. They mostly leave out the taboos, but if you’re a fan of Pure Taboo you will likely enjoy this site.
This site is owned by the group that owns Blacked.com, Blacked Raw, Tushy Raw, Tushy and Vixen. They are now offering a package that includes all those sites and Deeper for one price, but they don’t show the price. I think that’s worth mentioning if you’re into those sites. I have only been a member of Blacked.com and Tushy. I didn’t think those were anything special, but Deeper is like a completely different site from those. I say that because Blacked.com and Tushy were very similar to me. Deeper is just that. It adds a much deeper feeling to the scenes. I don’t think the download limit is terrible. It’s obviously set up the way it is to get you to stay as a member for more than a month and I plan on doing that. Two months should be enough to get all the scenes I want to download.
The models are really outstanding. I didn’t recognize one named Sofi Ryan, but thought that’s the kind of model I think men want to see. Emily Willis is on here too and I know she’s popular. Gianna Dior, September Reign, Adriana Chechik, just to name a few. There’s not an unattractive model on here.
The video quality could explain why they have download limits. They offer these resolutions on all 163 scenes -- 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and three mobile resolutions. The newest scenes offer those resolutions too, but have much higher bitrates and are massive files. The newest scene’s 4K resolution video is nearly 12GB, the 1080p is 6GB, the 720p is 4GB, even the 480p is 1GB. Besides higher bitrates on the newer scenes they also are long scenes. The Muse series has 3 episodes in it and is the newest 3 scenes. The 3 scenes combined are 3 hours and 20 minutes.
Just like there isn’t an unattractive model, I don’t think there is a scene I would want to skip from downloading. It feels like they took a risk with this content since it looks like the softer hardcore porn, but it’s not soft.
There are 116 models which when combined with the number of scenes tells you there are quite a few scenes with multiple models in them. That’s the touch of kink they added. I have been very happy with the content I have watched from here and think it’s one of the best sites I have been a member of. I definitely would recommend it to those into hardcore scenes, but maybe think “does it have to be that hardcore?”. They do a very good job, especially the series scenes, of being just edgy enough to be exciting, but not too hardcore to make the scenes feel uncomfortable. One of the best sites I have joined this year. |
|
10-06-20 12:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Devils Film
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, multi-niche network that has a few of my favorite niches in large numbers.
7,198 scenes with a new scene added every 3-4 days.
All newer scenes have 160p - 1080p download options.
Navigation works well if you can control your clicking.
Most scenes also come with downloadable pictures.
Good streaming player if you're not interested in downloading the videos. |
| Cons: |
A lot of the non-fetish content seems generic to me.
The filter options are confusing and make it best for people who know exactly what they're looking for. |
| Bottom Line: |
Devil's Films is a porn studio that while maybe are not that known for it, are one of the best studios for fetish and alternative content. The biggest draw for me are the 147 bisexual scenes. That is bigger than many standalone bisexual sites and the content is high quality. They also are still releasing new bisexual scenes which can only be said for a few sites. There are 723 transsexual scenes too. The best part about their transsexual scenes is they have a large amount of threesomes that include a male, a transsexual and a female. You don't see that a lot anymore. There are only a few sites that I know of that have transsexuals with women. That touches on my interest in bisexual sex and adds a woman to the mix. Those close to 900 combined scenes are my main interest on Devil's Film.
They still have another 7,000 scenes for everyone else. The scenes I have watched that are not bisexual or transsexual do give me a generic feeling. Everything seems scripted, timed and logged. It doesn't mean the content is bad. It just means it's not what I'm into.
Their video quality is impressive with 1080p and down being available on nearly all their videos and the newer videos add the 4K option. The pictures are just screencaps, but they are downloadable and they do have over 200+ in nearly every set. They are not high resolution pictures.
Besides the bisexual and transsexual scenes they have a large collection of stepfamily scenes from their series, "Out of the Family", it has 857 just from that series. There are lesbian series, a hairy series, a teen series and over 350 gangbang scenes in their Devil's Gangbang series. I do believe most if not all of the models are pros. I don't know all of them, but most do look familiar.
I believe anyone trying Devil's Films should have a reason besides "porn". They cover a lot of niches and fetishes. The filter system is very useful once you get the hang of it, but until you do, there's a good chance you're going to click the wrong filter and get yourself lost in a sea of scenes. It's a large network that is really more fetish-heavy than I think most realize. Nearly a third of their scenes are transsexual, bisexual, stepfamily and gangbang. If you're into any of those you will find a lot to like and download. The downloads are unlimited as long as you join using the download option and not the streaming-only option. |
|
09-09-20 02:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A terrific site for many women’s favorite fantasies.
Great looking men and women.
Nice video quality as all scenes are in HD.
Excellent photo sets with one for each video.
Vendo is a very trusted biller.
Comes with a network of 34 other teen sites that I liked. |
| Cons: |
No discount through Porn Users. I recommend looking around on the internet for a better price.
Too small and not updating. I want more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have a complaint about Teen Mega World. They start sites that I love and then stop updating them. Dirty Doctor has only 38 HD scenes and they stopped adding new ones in 2017 and in 2016 they had only one new update.
What a shame. Dirty Doctor has a lot going for it. To begin with, it is a fantasy come alive for me and many other women. My gynecologist is gorgeous and getting naked for him makes me so hot. He is all business, but I always leave his office feeling like I need to take care of my business when I get home.
The doctors on the site are some of the best older men I have seen in porn. There are several niches featured on Dirty Doctor and one is old and younger. Another is the uniform fetish, as the doctors look the role. There is even a scene where a nurse in uniform “works” along with the doctor.
I wish the scenes were in English as that would add a lot. In the opening of the story, a young lady enters her doctor’s office. They talk for a few moments and I wish I knew what they were talking about. Next she goes behind a partition and she strips. Why? She is about to show him all her intimate parts but she is shy? Then he does the usual doctor things like a pap smear or inserts a speculum. He looks down her throat and she says ah. He has her spread wide in stirrups.
But there is a twist. He breaks every rule regarding sex with his patients. When he gives her a pap smear, he also sticks his fingers inside and stimulates her. He rubs her clit. After he takes the speculum out, he inserts his cock. When he looks down her throat and then takes out the stick, he puts his other hard stick in. When she is spread out in the stirrups, he uses a vibrator on her. In one scene he inserts anal beads while he is massaging her clit. OMG. I need a doctor like this.
In a few scenes, he acts like he is enjoying this, but in most it is played deadpan as if this was routine and normal in a doctor’s office visit. In one scene he has her bend over so he can check her out from behind. He suddenly becomes a clown and makes gestures as if this was a comedy being played out for the audience.
When she leaves he sometimes gives her some medication. I don’t know if he helped her with her “condition” but he sure helped me with mine.
I have seen some of these models before, so I expect these are pros. I am not familiar enough with European models to know who they are. You also get a huge, 34 site teen network as part of your join price. I would give this a 90, but the small number of videos is a big negative in an otherwise near perfect site. |
|
09-28-20 08:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Men begging for a pegging.
Most of the scenes are believable.
Around 450 scenes with new scenes being added twice a month.
An underrated niche that is -- according to research -- more common than we think.
Some of the scenes lead you into the what did I just watch feeling, but most of the guys believably enjoy being dominated by the wide array of Kink models.
Included with the Kink network, which has 83 other Kink sites. |
| Cons: |
A few of the women models do not do a very good job of convincing the viewer they are dominating the man.
I would like to see gangbang action, 3 or 4 women with strap-ons, taking turns on the guy.
Going against the first con, some of the women do too good of a job of convincing they dominated the man. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been a member of Kink's network since the launch day. I like the debauchery of their content.
Divine Bitches is my favorite Kink site. It is not perfect. None of the Kink sites are. You have to come into these sites with a suspension of disbelief. That is why Divine Bitches is a good site for me. The guys do a believable enough job of making you think they are willing to let the woman stick her dildo up their butt - just so they can get closer to her. I have seen numbers as high as 20% of married couples have experimented with pegging. Of the married couples I know, the number is even higher.
There is not a lot of story in these scenes. Kink sometimes can get too deep into a story. The setting and feel of the scenes has changed over the years. The older scenes relied on a very attractive female model seducing her boy toy into bending over for her. He was usually given -- in trade -- vaginal intercourse with her. The settings included doctor's offices, bedrooms, hotels, the more recent scenes go to a more dominant style of the female giving him no choice. He could be tied up, blindfolded, whipped into submission or in a few of the newer ones, the female is much bigger physically.
All Kink scenes have a short part at the end where the males, females involved in the scene talk about the experience and how much they enjoyed it.
There are scenes that include cuckolds. Those are not common, but are as believable as any cuckold scene is. It usually involves the acting wife to use her strap-on on her acting husband, in his butt, in his mouth, while the other man has sex with her or receives a blowjob from her.
This is common on Kink, the older scenes, are usually the best ones. One disappointment for me is Kink seems to no longer look for that one model that can consistently pull the niche/scene off. Mia Little has been featured several times in the last year; she is good at this niche, but they almost always put the man in bondage.
My favorite recent scene features Aaliyah Love dominating Corbin Dallas. As small as she is and as many times as she has been the submissive one, she seems to channel an inner dominatrix. Her and Corbin seem to really enjoy the scene.
The scenes are very long for scenes without much story and with usually only two people -- averaging in the 50 minutes to 70 minutes range -- you get your money's worth out of these scenes.
I would be remiss to say some straight men probably would not like this content. Some of the scenes do get very rough. There are some in the older scenes where you think the guy's balls are going to literally explode from the rope torture. The content has been toned down now. It is like watching a regular porn scene except it does not start with the woman on her knees, but she usually is on her knees at the end of the scene.
With a year subscription, I do not download a lot, the scenes can be very large in file size. Their streaming player works very well for me. Against the type of site it is, some of the best scenes, are the ones where the woman starts to laugh -- in a feeling sorry for him way. I would like to see them bring more of the mainstream models in to shoot these scenes. There are several scenes where the female pats the male on the back and hugs him like she is sorry she is doing that bad thing to him.
I like the dark humor in Kink's style of porn and Divine Bitches does dark humor as good as any of their sites. |
|
07-14-19 02:26am
Replies (2)
|
Review
61
|
Doc Squirt
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good site that is only held back by its small size
Includes access to four other sites
Pro models including a few I really like (Roxy Lips and Roxy Sky)
Three separate download options on videos including 4K, 1080p and 720p
Uses CCBill as biller if you select “alternate biller”.
Scenes are surprisingly long despite hardly no story (30+ minutes, with some in the 40+ minutes range). |
| Cons: |
Varying consistency in the “squirt”.
Navigation on the “network” is okay, but it shows terrible inconsistencies.
There are screen captures, but no pictures and the screen captures are not downloadable. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some strong positives. The video quality on all the scenes is excellent. They have even started adding updates again after what looks like a Covid break. The 4 sites that are included are: Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Xfeeds.net, from what I can tell the Xfeeds.net is just a site that collects all the content from Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Doc Squirt into one location. That’s why I said there’s terrible inconsistency. Doc Squirt only shows 15 scenes, but if you search in the categories, there are 27 squirting videos. It looks like they tried to make everything look more complicated than it is and it made the sites more complicated than they need to be.
The scenes do follow a similar plot. I will go into my experience of “squirting”. It is possible for an aroused woman to squirt, but I assume porn directors and producers don’t take the time to look up definitions. A squirt is a small quantity of liquid ejected from something. That’s when you know the squirt is real and some of these scenes do have women ejaculating or squirting small amounts of liquid. The rest are doing the porn-loved fountain squirt that soaks the entire room. That is accomplished by pressing on the bladder. Much talk is about g-spot stimulation with the fountain squirt, but it’s bladder pressure. The g-spot stimulation causes the small squirt that isn’t near as visually impressive or -- soaking.
I thought both of the Roxy Lips scenes on Doc Squirt were excellent. She does seem to be a natural squirter and you can even watch the woman’s expressions. A lot of those fountain squirters are laughing. If a woman is having an orgasm that causes fluid to squirt across a room she’s not going to be laughing. I have seen Roxy Lips on a few other sites showing her squirting ability. The other Roxy (Sky), just puts on a great performance, she’s very energetic and into the scene. It seems like as long as squirting has been in porn someone would realize how fake or real the squirting looks.
The size of the site is disappointing and it’s one reason I decided to review it. I joined through Doc Squirt since it looked like they had at least 30-40 or more scenes on the site, but it only shows 15 once in the member area. The recent updates include 3 over the last month. The scenes I could live without are the ones where the guy sticks multiple fingers in the woman and jerks his arm as fast as possible since if you do that to any woman she’s going to urinate on you! This niche would be better served with a “Mistress Squirt” instead of Doc Squirt. They could easily find women who are capable of teaching most women to at least ejaculate a little liquid. Instead, it’s more of the same as it has been for the last 10 years of a man showing the bladder weakness of women if their insides are being stretched open. It’s a good site when combined with the network, but as a site on its own it wouldn’t be worth most people’s time unless they really liked specific models. The model list follows the problems of the navigation since it doesn’t separate the models scenes by site. It just shows you that a model has 4 scenes and one of each of those could be on one of each of their sites, even if you are on the Doc Squirt site. |
|
02-09-21 06:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
DogFart
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The entire Dogfart network consists of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
The network updates 4 times per week.
The network has 1,598 female models.
Over 6,000 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The whole network has a $4 charge per 4K scene download.
Of the 23 sites, I liked at most 4 of them and would call the rest average or below.
There’s a near total lack of creativity on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
The first hint telling me this is a network directed at men was they list two gay sites on their network. One is Blacks And Boys, the other is Gloryholes and Handjobs. How does that tell me it’s directed at men? They also have a site called Zebra Girls that is about interracial lesbian (gay) sex, but it’s not listed as gay. It’s probably something only a woman would notice, but they’re making it clear lesbians are okay for straight guys, but giving a fair warning to straight guys when there’s a gay male scene.
My overall feeling is the network is not bad as a whole. Nearly all of the sites have at least some good scenes, but my main complaint is the way they focus on certain sites in their new updates and update schedule. I know the Gloryhole.com site has been around a long time, so why keep updating it when you have newer sites that are more creative and just by reading user comments on the scenes are much more liked?
I will use this as an example, the “gay” sites are not very popular as most of the scenes don’t even have any user comments on them, so they stopped updating them. It shows they understand the concept of putting out content your users want, but then you see a site like Blacks on Blondes that has nearly 1,000 scenes and they’re updating it once per week. They’re updating Gloryhole.com twice per month and it has nearly 700 scenes. While the similar, but more creative and -- in my opinion -- better sites like Gloryhole Initiations and We Fuck Black Girls have less than a combined 500 scenes and are only updated once per month. I’m not throwing out a generalization here. The user comments show that members want more of those two sites, but instead are getting the scenes from the same sites that have the most content on them.
The video quality is similar on all 23 sites. All newer scenes have 720p and 1080p download options. They also include a downloadable photo set with each scene. All of the older scenes on all of the sites are 480p. Only a few of the sites aren’t like that and they are the newer sites which are the better sites. Even with the site, Zebra Girls, I can’t imagine why they don’t push it more. It also only gets one update per month.
The network is massive in size and there’s no way you can go through it all in one month. I didn’t feel like any of the solo model sites were worth reviewing. A lack of creativity is bad enough, but adding to it that the same woman is in every scene just makes it too monotonous.
I can’t say I was disappointed in the network and would even say maybe I was a little happier (overall) with it than I expected I would be, but I won’t be joining it again. In comparison to other interracial sites I have been a member of, I do think it’s one of the better ones, especially the newer scenes. I just don’t think it’s that great as a whole network. |
|
02-26-21 06:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Dom The Nation
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, excellent for a specialized niche site
Extremely high level of creativity
Has links with discounts for its sister BDSM sites, Assylum and Slavemouth
Not only a fetish site for BDSM, it works as an older/younger site and a rarity for porn, every scene is outdoors in a rural, natural setting
Uses tags like painal, whipping, and impact play.These are specific to BDSM scenes |
| Cons: |
Less than 40 updates and six are only a few photos
The videos and photo sets are not separated |
| Bottom Line: |
Some sites are easy to compare to their competitors as they have a lot in common. Very few sites can be truly called unique or original. But then again I occasionally run across the rare site that is so different that it can truly be called out of the norm, in a way that you can only hope that others will imitate. You may well ask, what is so different? Two people or more take off their clothes and do the deed, so how is this site worthy of singling out for praise?
Porn is about fantasy and many times the porn you see is not truly how it is done offscreen by regular people like you and me. A great example is that most lesbian porn is a fantasy for men and real lesbians have told me that they don’t like a lot of it. This site is a work of love by real life Dom Neil, who found much of the BDSM porn made today does not appeal to him.
He is also quite a camera artist and loves the freedom and beauty of nature. If the idea of seeing scenes shot outdoors day and night, with all levels of lighting appeals to you, this is your site. If you love seeing rented farmland, or mountains, streams and models having fun appeals to you, this just may be your site. The same is true for camerawork that should be studied and imitated on how to get the essence of the model’s personality. Or maybe you just like unrehearsed, never overplanned and never boring BDSM with great models who enjoy their work.
In some of the first few updates, you get journal entries and playful scenes more than the sex scenes. The site started off a bit slowly as they started filming in 2019, but delayed the launch until February of 2021. As a result the site does not have a ton of content. The planning that went into filming the site gives it a lot of potential moving forward. The models wear custom made audio collars that work well in order to pick up sounds outdoors. Every scene is shot with the panorama of nature a second focus to the models and the action.
The video specs can be confusing. The main thing to note is the films are presented in 2.39:1 (very widescreen) cinema format, using film with some anamorphic lenses, and when you desqueeze the image from the lenses, this is the size you get. It's great for capturing the beauty and presence of the landscapes. The movies on the site are filmed in cinemascope and the actual videos specs are a bit different from regular 16:9 video specs due to the cinemascope format.
All of the sexual content revolves around very hard BDSM. If you find a site like this to be appealing, you will find a lot to like such as difficult positions, bondage, anal, rimming, forceful oral and peeing. In every case, he makes sure the models act out fantasies they have and gets the maximum pleasure from them captured on film. There is also playful content that helps you see a real, very accessible side to the models too. An example of one of the playful scenes has Rory Knox using a blow dryer on the Dom’s underwear as an example of another kind of blowjob. Another scene that I enjoyed was the same Rory Knox giving Dom Neil a foot job. She licked every toe and took his foot into her mouth as acts of worship like I have never seen before.
In another with a high level of male fantasy, Audrey Holliday who was beaten and anally abused while, hold on, playing football. I can imagine a guy grabbing a beer and watching this scene in a loop during halftime. My absolute favorite scene was any of the three that Rebel Rhyder was in. The one where she was cosub with Brooke Johnson was amazing as they both obeyed Dom Neil in a scene worthy of an award. The interactions between them, as well as with Dom Neil, were enough to make me love the site.
The site was easy to use, except for the fact that the videos and the photo sets were mixed together. The site lists updates in chronological order, not by type. Additions currently are every two weeks, but the archive is still small with less than 40 and that includes photo updates. I liked the site and can confidently predict a great future for it as it has a great concept and does what it does very well. |
|
10-28-21 07:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
Dream Tranny
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual site that has two of my favorite transsexual niches – solo and transsexual sex with a female.
Large site with 560 scenes plus 206 scenes in their archive (first time I have seen a site have a separate archive). The site updates 3 times per week.
All transsexual sites are hit or miss with me on attractiveness from model to model. This one is too. But most are attractive with some very pretty transsexuals too. There are 322 models.
The navigation is very good. The search filters include everything you could possibly find on a transsexual site and that is good for me with my preference of solo/masturbation and transsexuals with females. Updates are easy to find, they even show previews of soon to come scenes.
Video downloads are available in 480p, 720p and 1080p. There are photosets with 100+ photos in 2000x3000 resolution, those are also downloadable.
The price is very good for this much high quality content. |
| Cons: |
Looking at the archive section, the video quality does drop on the older videos in it, but as mentioned, I haven’t ever seen a site split their content up between updates and archive. Some of the archive content has 1080p. A few of those scenes are just photosets. It is me trying to find something to list as a con.
The photo downloads all have the same filename. I have had that same problem on multiple other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of the better transsexual sites I have been a member of. My two biggest interests in transsexual porn – as a straight woman, are the solo scenes and the scenes of the transsexuals having sex with a female. It fills in a gray area between bi-curious (for me) and I enjoy watching penises masturbated. That’s not a niche that any genre covers well, but I do believe the transsexual genre comes closest and this site especially does.
Using their search filters, I can see that they have 25 transsexuals having sex with females scenes. I would like that to be a little higher, but that’s part of liking a niche that isn’t mainstream. Some is better than none. Where this site makes me very happy is they have over 200 solo scenes. The number is higher, but because some masturbation scenes turn into sex scenes, I’m estimating at 200 to be on the safe side, most of those that come up as masturbation are solo. They use something I can’t say I’ve seen with transsexuals and that’s a fucking machine. It doesn’t fully register with me since I am most interested in watching the masturbation. It’s definitely not a distraction. You see more of the feminine side of these transsexuals with the fucking machines and even manual dildos. These two paragraphs represent my favorite content on the site.
There is a search filter I feel needs to be brought up. Natural breasts. More and more transsexuals are going to female hormone therapy and developing natural breasts instead of implants. I believe that adds a lot of value to this site. As I mentioned, one of my interests in transsexual is maybe a version of bi-curious. The transsexual having real breasts really goes into that curiosity. The only thing that is masculine about some of these models is their penis. Natural breasts makes that even more noticeable and I also believe natural breasts tempers expectations on the natural breasted transsexuals performance. If she doesn’t have the full masculine hormones, there’s a good chance she’s not going to be able to create a large ejaculation.
The sex scenes are surprisingly long, with many nearing the 40 minute range and that’s just not that normal in transsexual porn. It is hard to believe, but transsexual porn has already formed its own version of repetitive porn just like male/female straight porn has, but this site avoids that.
There isn’t a lot to find wrong with this site. Maybe they could cut back a little on the ads? It’s not bad, but when you first sign-in there is the page with multiple offers of other sites. Every page on the site also has a few ads across the top of the screen, but I guess they have to make money. It’s at least not distracting. I have said before I believe sites need to cater to a more balanced audience. This one does it as well as any site does. It has around 1/3 of its content in the solo niche, the 25 scenes of transsexual with a female and the rest is transsexuals with men or transsexuals with transsexuals. I like seeing the different niches within the genre covered.
As mentioned, this is a large site with over 700 scenes (including archives). The quality is excellent for a transsexual site with at least 75% of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads. The downloadable photosets with the 2000x3000 resolution. The near perfect navigation. The addition of the “natural breasts” search filter/tag. They just aren’t giving me much to complain about.
It’s up near the top of my favorite transsexual sites now. I would like to see them add some ladyboys, Asian transsexuals, but there are other sites that do that. It’s just an idea. This site has earned its score. |
|
10-21-21 03:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
Dud Cast
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Routine, casting-type site
Currently is updating 6 times a month
“Amateur” models (I recognize several of them) that I believe are speaking Russian
Subtitles for the talking parts
Multiple camera angles for good or bad
Videos are 1080p or 720p and are downloadable
Most of the models are young and cute |
| Cons: |
The multiple camera angles sometimes messes up the view
No 4K (possibly recycling?)
I never figured out the “dud” part
A model with as known of a name as Gina Gerson is on this site, but they don’t even list her by name until the description of the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
This came with Doc Squirt and I believe the XFeeds.net site also gives access to the same sites. This one does make me wonder about the new updates. Longtime PU members have talked about the video quality often pointing to older videos being recycled. Most of the sites in this small network have a 4K video option, but this one doesn’t, yet they show 6 new updates over the last month. I will review the XFeeds.net site separately as it shows the full list of problems these potentially good sites are having.
I would like an explanation on the “dud” part of the name. I was expecting something along the lines of guys that were having trouble keeping it up or ones that started having performance anxiety. Also, with the way they show the site “her first time”, I was expecting female models that were hesitant, maybe even believably shy, but what I got was a normal casting site with an older man (maybe he’s the dud?), casting younger women and they do try to add a story of them talking the model into the scene. The older man doesn’t have sex with all of the models. He sometimes has a guy he calls his “nephew” also in the scenes. One scene I watched ended with the older casting man, simply known as “agent”, say, “You both were great” where’s the dud?
This is also not a large site. It’s quite small with 36 scenes. I do think that puts more emphasis on the importance of whether those “new” scenes are really new or not. The scenes may even go too much into a story, which I’m usually complaining there’s not enough of. The scenes are under 30 minutes and you can expect 10 of those minutes to be the setup. Some of the scenes just read like (from the translated subtitles) they picked a hooker up. One of the women says her cost is 800 Euros per day. I’m not for sure anything can get lost in that translation.
The videos even without 4K are very clear in the 1080p format. The camera angles are probably done for effect, but I don’t see any major benefit from them. They have one camera angle from the ceiling that looks like a security cam view. There’s the older agent guy carrying a handheld camera and there does seem to be at least one other camera view. There isn’t much bouncing camera which is why I believe there’s another camera. It’s not full point-of-view even when the agent is the one having sex. It’s not a bad site, but the group of sites combined, even the discount here on Porn Users, still feels underwhelming. |
|
02-09-21 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
66
|
Ersties
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Mostly amateur models in solo, male/female, lesbian, group scenes.
Some of the women are very attractive. There is more of a natural look going on here.
Bills through Epoch.
Daily updates and good tagging system.
The solo scenes and especially outdoors solo are the best scenes on here for me.
If you like the site a lot, the 3 month deal for $45 is a good deal. |
| Cons: |
If you are hesitant and only join for one month, it's going to set you back $35.
Besides the tagging system, the overall navigation is not user-friendly and is confusing.
The much hyped "playdate" feature is a free cam show until the model decides you have to pay to see more. Kind of like Chaturbate.
I was attracted to the real couples chemistry aspect of their advertising, they have more solo scenes than male/female, lesbian, threesomes and orgies combined.
I'm straight, maybe bi-curious at times and found none of the men attractive.
Scenes are split for no particular reason.
I also don't care for the whimsical, pastel, layout of the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems to be a very polarizing site. A brief thought on that, I do like some of the content. I especially found the model Anya to be very attractive and sensual in her newest scene.
After that, a lot of the problems come from what is a business model I don't appreciate. Besides charging $35 for 1 month, there's the Playdate feature that they heavily advertise. If you go to the model list, the first 3 blocks are upcoming Playdates. These are live so you have to be online when they have it. I was able to make it to a recent one. Each one has the words, "Free Live Show" on it. I signed in to watch and was taken to a screen that said:
There are three types of playdates
#1 Free Playdates:
These playdates are open, varied and influenced by you, the viewer! If you want the opportunity to determine the course of the playdate, then make sure you have some Ersties Coins added to your account!
#2 Ticket Playdates:
These shows will be prepared by the Ersties Models themselves, allowing you a front row seat as the models indulge the naughty exhibitionist side of their kinky personality.
Tickets can be purchased in advance of the show using coins from your membership account.
#3 Private Playdates:
If you enjoy an Ersties Playdate and want to get the model a little more intimately, you can invite them to a private 1-on-1 playdate!
If a model offers 1-on-1 playdates, this will be displayed at the bottom of this page.
The tokens or coins cost anywhere from 90 for $15 to 960 for $150. Isn't that just like any cam show? They also have Ersties Cams.
I do believe that's important to the review since you are not told you will have to buy tokens to interact with these Playdates. I wouldn't be as negative about it if they didn't also have Ersties Cams. It makes Playdates look like it's something different.
The site itself, they do solo porn well, but they do have the scenes cut into parts. These parts are not used to switch outfits or locations. One of the recent scenes, a woman lays on the couch and masturbates. The scene stops, the next part of the scene, she is bent over the chair masturbating right beside the couch she was on. She didn't even put her clothes back on.
There are interviews on every scene and they are a separate video. They don't list the number of interviews (no tag for it), but this is what they do list: 639 solo scenes, 384 lesbian scenes, 59 boy/girl, 26 threesomes, 9 orgies. These numbers are not determinations of how many of those scenes they have since most have multiple parts. For instance: Mona and Vanessa In Action 1, Mona and Vanessa In Action 2. Just like the solo scene described above, these two videos are in the same location. It gets halfway through the full scene and stops, then you have to go find part 2 of it. They do not always release them back to back. For instance: Layla and Mae In Action 1 was released and Layla and Mae In Action 2 had 16 other scenes released between In Layla and Mae In Action 1 and Layla and Mae In Action 2.
A lot of the lesbian scenes are good, but who knows how many parts I'm going to miss when my membership expires? They have a Christmas lesbian anal scene that has 4 parts. It looks like the 3rd part came out about six weeks ago, in March.
I do like that they're exploring more into public scenes. I really enjoyed the Rebecca In Action 1 scene of a pretty model masturbating on a train. They also have a lesbian library scene that I liked a lot.
If they start doing more of these risky scenes, it will at least give me interest in coming back, maybe even for 3 months. I also like their group/orgy scenes. A few other notes I've seen advertised include BDSM. They have 15 BDSM scenes and those are split, making it more like 7 or 8.
The navigation is a problem because they group lesbians together, then list them separate if they have a solo scene. Clicking on the scene does show all their scenes, solo, lesbian, etc, but there's no way to figure out how many models they have since one model could be listed solo, then again in lesbian. The scenes can't be counted since most of them have multiple parts to one scene.
I'm not really into or against "natural" models, but in the tags there are 606 scenes listed with shaved pubic hair, 310 with trimmed pubic hair and 230 listed as hairy.
There's something that just doesn't feel right about their advertising. With that said, the scenes overall are okay and would possibly be very good if they didn't split them. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p downloads.
The best way to finish this up is my membership is about to expire. They released an interview of Caireen and Mirah, it also has a scene of them showering together and Caireen going down on Mirah, but that's In Action 1. Which means I won't likely have my membership when In Action 2 comes out. It's like watching a soap opera or television series. Maybe a longer membership would be the answer? It's an average site with potential for me. |
|
04-19-20 02:40am
Replies (4)
|
Review
67
|
Euro Angels
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I have been a member of this network many times, but never noticed this site of very pretty European models in hardcore and lesbian scenes.
It is not updating, but it has 611 scenes. It is hard to quantify the difference between large sites with no updates and small sites with weekly updates. There is a lot here that is good.
Good differential in the time of the scenes, some are as short as 20 minutes, some are as long as 40 minutes. I have a theory at this point of my porn viewing and collecting hobby about that difference.
There is good kinkiness in these scenes which I don’t see as much in hardcore scenes from American models. A lot of niches are covered.
A lot of big name stars on this site, including some I didn’t know identified as European.
It’s my last pro, but it is the one I like the best. A lot of these scenes have more than two people in them. I think I have just reached boredom with one on one scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating, there is some good news, the majority of the scenes have HD downloads.
These are from DVDs based on the names of the scenes, but there is no continuity between the scenes. That is a part of porn I don’t understand.
This could be a pro or con. If you are familiar with sites like 21 Sextury, this is a lot like it and even features similar models but is a little kinkier. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not for sure about the validity of the name of this site. It is Euro Angels, but the first scene I noticed features Lisa Ann, who is an American. Maybe the other scenes from that DVD are mostly European models. I usually recognize maybe 20-25% of models by name. I recognize a lot of these including a male that I know is in a lot of scenes on 21 Sextury, named Choky Ice. This is professional porn. You’re not going to get much story.
You do get a lot of action. I believe this is impressing me from all the generic, I think it’s called heartcore or softcore-hardcore, that just seems like two people having regular sex. This site brings the porn part back into focus. There are threesomes, foursomes, two couples, that is porn to me. There are some one on one scenes and even some solo scenes. You still a lot more of the more than 2 people scenes. Showing the categories, I think, gives an idea of what I’m trying to say. Of the 611 scenes: 275 have anal, 52 have dual penetration, 13 have double blowjob, 23 are group sex, 113 are lesbian, 59 are solo, 52 are threesomes, that’s a good mixture. That, for me, is missing from most standard hardcore sites.
I was concerned about the video quality. About half of the scenes have HD, the ones before those are 480p. It’s worth a look. There are scenes on this site that I will keep over some of the newer scenes in high quality, just based on the energy and porn feeling of the scenes. I think the best ones are the two couples. They don’t swap. It’s two couples having sex on the same or adjacent couches. That is kinky to me. My theory on the different length scenes is I have noticed if a site has scenes that are all almost the same length (2-3 minutes difference), it’s very repetitive and planned out. I don’t care if every scene is planned just don’t make me has a reason to see that. There are hardcore sites where at 8 minutes, the oral stops, at 12 minutes the woman goes into cowgirl, at 20 minutes it’s doggystyle and at 23 minutes, the cumshot. On this site there is as much as a 20-30 minute difference in scenes. Just from watching the scenes I can see that there is a difference. We talk about using our imaginations. Doing the same thing at the same time in each scene shuts my imagination off. I already know what the next position will be. It’s a site not to overlook. |
|
01-12-22 08:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
68
|
Evil Angel
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Possibly my favorite current network. Excellent job of different niches and genres.
Very impressive quality and quantity: 19,946 scenes and everything after 2011 has at least HD 720 and 1080, with the newer scenes having 4K. Updates are 1-2 times per day.
Seems like they accidentally stumbled into being one of the best transsexual sites, even with all the straight scenes too.
Some of the producer sites that don’t have listings here really stand out to me like the Dana Vespoli produced scenes.
The navigation is very good. You can go from site to site and it has so many filters (models, categories) that you can click as not wanting to see or wanting to see.
There’s not hardly any of their sites that should be overlooked. Everything on this network is at least worth looking into. |
| Cons: |
You have to look for cons on this network. Maybe you could say there’s overuse of certain models, especially the males.
They could have better pictures, even professional quality, photo sets would add to it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Evil Angel’s original draw for me was the transsexual content. They have TS Playground, Transsexual Angels and TS Factor which is one that is easy to overlook. They have the new, but I think underwhelming, PansexualX. Those transsexual sites have a total of 2,491 scenes and of those 2,491, 1,086 are solo which I really like and 248 are transsexual with a woman. I don’t know if there is another site that has that much of those two niches in the transsexual genre on one site. I know the network has long been known for their hardcore content, but they have as impressive of a transsexual collection as most transsexual networks. They also have 65 bisexual male scenes. I was just on a bisexual male site that only had 43 scenes.
I mentioned the Dana Vespoli directed scenes. There are 209 of those, it’s advertised as “Smart sexy features, intimate female orientated sex”. It’s really some of the most hardcore sex I have seen. That is important. If it was degrading or disgusting, I wouldn’t watch it. I think these scenes are right at my limit for what is almost too hardcore. I do like that.
I don’t think they would mind that I say I like this network better than Adult Time. Both are owned by the same company. This one has less of the same type of porn. Every update is likely going to be different than the previous one. It’s one of the only sites or networks that I check the updates each day. They have a 1-2 new updates per day schedule. The video quality is very high.
I haven’t ever been that focused on navigation in my reviews. This network is that good at navigation. It has to be talked about. It looks overwhelming at first. Everything I have checked, works on the navigation. There is the one problem you should be aware of. It has the sliders that you can set for bisexual only, lesbian only, transsexual only. I have opened different channels/sites on the network to see nothing. It’s because I had the filters set to just show bisexual. If you are into the different genres that is an invaluable tool. The categories are good. It is very close to being a perfect site.
Besides the nearly 20,000 scenes, they have 6,045 models. I like that there is an ethnic blend in the models. Their latest models show the depth of models they have. One is Eden Ivy, who is a pretty, college to mid-20s looking white model. The second newest Anuskatzz, who is nearly completely covered with tattoos, the polar opposite of Eden Ivy. The third latest or newest is Isabella Fontana, who is a Latin, very pretty transsexual. If you go just a little further there is Alicia Reign, who is a either a Latina or biracial maybe. The model variance is like the scene variance. You get something different with the site. I do plan on keeping my year membership. I replaced my year Kink membership with a year to Evil Angel. It is the only year membership I currently have.
There are what I call, “Neanderthalic” scenes, especially in the older scenes. That kept me from joining long-term in the past. I don’t even mean the word disrespectfully. It’s a non-emotional, non-feeling, cold version of porn that reminds me of what the cavemen did. While most sites have decreased in quality it seems like this network just keeps getting better. |
|
01-12-22 08:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
69
|
Evil Angel
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this site and have to say I feel completely overwhelmed.
I like a lot of hardcore porn -- I also like some transsexual and like most women, the male/male/female bisexual scenes too. They have all of them!
My account, joined on Halloween special, says 14,760 scenes, they have 60 male/male/female bisexual and 2,096 transsexual scenes. This will take me years to go through!
The site works well enough to be able to find those numbers above just by sliding a simple slider, but there's a lot of options on here I don't understand. I don't know who any of these directors are. |
| Cons: |
There's not enough time or patience in me to go through all this content. I need more filters.
It could be more clear. I click on movies and it brings up entire DVDs and I don't know if they are the newest ones or oldest ones. There's so much content it's like they can't contain it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've heard about this site for years. It lives up to what I've heard. I've already seen a couple scenes I wish hadn't seen. I've seen a few that made me wonder if a straight female that finds a transsexual woman attractive is still straight? I really believe the male/male/female bisexual niche is vastly underrated. They don't have a lot here, but I don't have any of these so I will definitely be adding those to my collection of bisexual scenes.
Some of these scenes have 4K. One of my current favorite stars is Karma Rx and she has an entire DVD on here that has her First Interracial DP, First Double Anal and first scene ever with a transsexual. Those alone are worth the price of the site as cheap as it is on holidays.
The biggest complaint I have is I know I'm not going to find 1/4 of what I'm looking for. It feels like they could have more filters. I know that they are at least related to Adult Time and that's what the navigation here reminds me of. It's not terribly, but you do feel like they could add some more options to it.
They have over 4,000 female models and nearly 1,000 transsexual models. I didn't realize there's a studio besides transsexual studios that shot this much transsexual porn.
Most of the videos have up to 1080p and some do have 4K, but I see no way to filter that to give an exact number. That part is frustrating enough to take 5 points off.
The content is mostly very hardcore, there's a lot of anal, a lot of dual penetration of multiple holes, including double penetration in one hole. They have small picture galleries with the scenes that you can download, most of the photos look like pre-scene photos.
I'm rating it very high because I haven't seen a site that appeals to this big of a crowd except for maybe Kink's network. They have every niche you could ask for, but they don't have a category search to let you separate them easily. Some of these transsexual scenes are very different. You will see a transsexual up a man's butt while the man, supposed to be straight is sucking the dick of another transsexual. It's absolute mayhem!
I will probably wait for the next round of holiday sales and maybe get a year to this one as I don't feel my month membership is going to help me find what all I'm looking for. |
|
11-05-19 12:58am
Replies (1)
|
Review
70
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What looks to be genuine amateur content
There are 229 scenes with no new updates in sight
Only one downloadable video option, but it is 720p WMV
Mixture of niches and the performance quality is just as varied
There are some hidden gems in these videos including a few group scenes. |
| Cons: |
No streaming ability. I like to scan through a scene to see if it’s worth downloading, but even though they have the option to stream nothing happens when you hit play.
The poor performances in some of the scenes.
Every scene varies including location, camerawork, attractiveness of models and there are more bad ones than good ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have seen the ex-GF network and thought maybe this was related to it, but I’m pretty sure it’s not. These videos are of young European guys and girls. I don’t know how much I believe the ex-GF part. The scenes I have downloaded and watched seem more like a desperate female trying to break into the porn industry by having someone film her having sex. Maybe the part that signals “amateurs” more than anything else are the guys in the scenes. There are guys in these scenes that look like they were picked up on the side of a road and cast into their first ever video. It is hard to tell how old these scenes are too. There is a group of guys that are in a couple of the scenes that have mullets, are wearing wife beater tank tops and look like they were just released from a low-security jail for shoplifting. It’s at least authentic.
That goes into the performances. The guys in these scenes give it their all. The girls go from at least interested and trying to look like they would rather be sleeping. The scene count is misleading as well. At least half of the scenes do not have videos with them. It seems to be either photos or video for each one. I haven’t found one scene yet that has both video and photos. There is a lot broken within the site too. The scenes with just pictures don't even have a picture of the girl in the scene. It’s a broken image with the x in the corner.
I do think there’s some redeeming qualities. Some of the videos are pretty good. The 720p video isn’t bad either. I think the biggest positive is this seems very authentic. It’s a nice change from the other sites on this network where I feel like nearly everything is formulaic and repetitive. There are some public and outdoor scenes too. I think this site makes me realize how frustrating the network is. Seeing the same positions in the same style room for nearly the same exact amount of minutes is not good when it comes to porn. This site is receiving a higher score than it probably deserves, but some might look over this site if they join this network. Maybe a decent score will make others look at it to get a break from the monotone style of most of the sites on this network. |
|
09-28-20 09:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, petite models, most look barely legal.
310 current scenes.
Downloads for videos and photo zips are available. Each scene has both.
One new scene per week.
Biller is Epoch.
Videos average 30 minutes each. |
| Cons: |
Is close to cookie cutter gonzo porn. The only unique feature is the size and cuteness of the models.
Not enough threesomes or more. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has some of the cutest, youngest looking models available. The clothing choices also makes them look and seem younger with skirt rompers, some pigtails and this is all accentuated by most of the males being tall and with large penises.
The scenes could have more story to them, but it seems like the whole site is just based on these small models trying to take on a bigger guy. The site has been around long enough to have 310 scenes. The videos are excellent quality and can be downloaded or streamed. The downloads top out at 1080p. The videos are crisp and clear, but they are large files on the 1080p ones. If you’re strapped for hard drive space you could always download the 720p, 576p or 480p versions. The 1080p ones can be as large as 3-4GB.
The models are the main attraction. Most of them are pros, but they are newer to the business or were newer when they filmed their scenes here. A good example of how they use the male model to make the female look smaller is a scene with Michael Swayze with Amber Summers. Michael Swayze is listed as 6’5”, Amber Summers is 5’1”. I just wish they would add a little more to it than the obvious size difference. A few scenes are more creative including one with the tiny woman hiding on top of a refrigerator, tucked under cabinets.
There is good diversity in the models, but we are talking about diversity in an age group/generation where mixed race is nearly the majority. A few scenes are called interracial, but the male and female both look white to me.
It’s a very good site if you like seeing smaller women having sex. And don’t mind the outfits they show up in being cliché like Girl Scouts, cheerleaders and plaid skirts with argyle socks. |
|
01-27-20 08:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
72
|
Family Screw
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I scored high when it was just starting out and it has grown nearly 3 times as much.
Multiple niches: It has the stepfamily, older/younger, group, that is one reason I scored it high when I first joined it 2 years ago.
All scenes have up to 4K downloads and there are now 63 scenes.
The site is very easy to navigate.
Some of the female models are very pretty. I don’t think that is an important part of this site.
American culture gets a pro. In India, having sex with a stepsibling is not considered taboo. I have been here long enough to accept it as taboo. |
| Cons: |
There will be people that say some of these women are not attractive. I agree with that. I think that is what they are going for. I will explain.
The scenes are not long enough. You won’t convince me a scene with 6 people in it is over in 22 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I found this site when I was looking for older/younger porn a few years ago. It was very new with only around 20 scenes, but I really liked it. I do approach these older/younger scenes with the mindset that the whole point of that genre is one of the people, usually the older one, isn’t supposed to be attractive. Their sexual experience and ability make them attractive to these younger, inexperienced people. That is how I look at it. If you think that’s crazy, one of the scenes on here is “stepgrandmother gets her boys a stripper”.
A scene I would recommend anyone to see what I am talking about is “Fucking stepgrandmother”. The woman is not attractive. For her age, she is not bad, and she has large breasts. The stegrandsons look 18-21 and they are all skinny, college boys and she has sex with all of them. That is one of those the time seems too short. That could add realism that the boys couldn’t last.
I forgot to mention in the pros, the site updates around 2 times per month. I could see some months having 3 based on the update schedule.
The part I really like is the scenes that have young men and old men with the same women. You can see the natural competitiveness from the older men. They are trying to keep up with the younger man. It makes it sexy.
There are 63 scenes, all 63 are worth downloading, if you are into this niche and genre. I believe the older/younger mix and making a lot of groups, goes beyond the stepbrother with stepsister that we usually see. This is another cultural one. In Indian culture, we do not use just uncle, aunt, our words are different based on which side of the family the uncle or aunt is on. It leaves me a lot of room for using imagination and fantasies. That is a big part of my enjoyment of porn. I’m not going to score it much higher than I did before. It still is the same site with the same potential. They will have to eventually find new, creative ways to stop this site from becoming stale. All the videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Everything is in place for the site to be very good. The only problem I really see is they have several of these older/younger sites and several stepfamily sites. I don’t understand the planning there. I would combine them and have a few updates per week. I still do like the site a lot. It could be a female perspective of being more mental than physical. The scenes are generally fun, too. |
|
01-12-22 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Family Screw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Small, but kinky and perverse threesomes to group sex.
With such a small collection you can at least say you liked every scene.
All 24 scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p
Some of these scenes reach new highs or lows in how believable and perverse they are.
I received a promo for it after being a member of Granddadz and Grandparents X. This is similar to those sites and really would like to see them combine them all into one network.
Updating twice per month. |
| Cons: |
I’ve seen some young male porn stars that seem overworked, but there’s a guy on here that I see in scenes all across this company’s sites named Gunther. He looks 60s, maybe 70s. I only list this as a con because he has trouble keeping it up.
I take this type of porn with the belief it’s in humor. At least one scene on this site is nearing disgusting.
There are some scenes that I don’t know who is supposed to be related or married or what they’re even doing. |
| Bottom Line: |
This disgusting scene features Gunther, see con #1 and a much younger male with a much older woman who I would describe as Marilyn Manson, 20 years from now, after a sex change. The subject of the scene even recognizes it, “Nasty present for youngest son”. A lot of these scenes are good. A few of them push the bad taste envelope.
I thought the best scene on the site was the best of any of their older/younger sites, it’s titled, “Luxury Wellness Receptionist” and has a very attractive man with a very pretty woman while Gunther joins in. He’s like a little Leprechaun.
I have had one common problem with their older/younger scenes and that is how short the scenes are. They have one scene here that has 9 people in it and it lasts barely 20 minutes.
The good thing with these sites is the high quality videos. 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The navigation doesn’t have to be that good. Every scene is on one page. I don’t recognize any of the models except Gunther. The main theme here starts with some sort of family connection. One is a family that is going to swinger’s club. I don’t know that I like admitting it, but the attraction for me is in the perverse nature of this niche. And they have such a broad range in looks between the models that it’s hard to imagine it being any less perverse, even without relation.
I’ll give it a decent score for the high quality everything and continuing to make scenes that seem near impossible to talk the younger people into. If they would combine this site with Grandparents X, Granddadz, Grandmams, I think it would be a major hit and at the top the older/younger genre.
Maybe it’s just my mind working in a bad way, but what happens – you know, when Gunther and the older stars kick the bucket? Of course, they can replace them, but he’s in so many of these scenes. The changes I would like to see made is either creating a network out of all their older/younger sites or speeding up the updates. I think if they combined the sites into a network you would be looking at a md-90s score. As it is, with a slow update schedule and a few really good scenes they have a chance to have a good to great site as the new updates come in, but it’s still going to take 3-4 years for them to just reach 100 total scenes.
It’s worth trying if you have tried and liked their other older/young scenes, especially if you get one of the cheaper promos, otherwise, I would wait a while and see what direction they take these sites into. |
|
04-29-20 03:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
74
|
Fetish Network
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big network dedicated to fetishes - 52 different sites.
The site works well. Probably better if you know what niche/fetish you are looking for.
Some mainstream fetishes like feet, hose and BDSM. Some fetishes that I believe are rare these days, including 3 sites with models that are smoking cigarettes, some bondage that makes Kink look tame and some like Brutal Castings, that are hard to even watch.
They do feature series videos that are interesting, both in story and how the scenes play out. There's not enough of those.
Quite possibly the corniest fetish -- hypnotized models. Those are entertaining to watch. |
| Cons: |
I know this shouldn't be a con since it is a fetish network, but some of the content is extremely hardcore, maybe the most hardcore I've seen.
Navigation isn't very good, there's no model list, but you can click a model's name in a scene and see all of her scenes.
Can't tell if it's updating and number count looks lower than the last TBP review. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the definition of a hit or miss network. About 20 of the sites are interesting to me, with 10 getting most of my attention. The other 20 are ones I'm not interested in at all.
I am into foot fetish and hose. They have over 500 scenes pertaining to foot fetish and/or hose. That's my money worth.
These series which they list as sites have some very good, interesting scenes with stories: Waitress POV, Teen Creeper, Teens in the Woods, Helpless Teens, Hostel XXX, Operation Escort, Internet Creeper, and Strap-On Squad. They just don't have enough of those. Five of those sites have 20 or less scenes on them. Three have 10 or less.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The older scenes are not as consistent. Some don't list what the download's resolution is and there is only one option to download "high".
The quality is overall very good.
I think the site Pantyhose Creep is maybe the most interesting one for me, but it only has 44 scenes on it.
I counted around 3,500 scenes, it's not exactly easy to count these as they list all 52 sites one page with a number out from it. I'm not going to sit here and punch 52 numbers into a calculator. I went over the numbers in my head and came up about 600 short of the last TBP review. It's possible I'm missing something or not counting something, but that shows the problem with the navigation as well.
It's a good, somewhat confusing network if you are into fetishes. I think those that like foot/hose would be as pleased with the network as I am. If you're into the really rough sex you would probably like some of the sites on here. Those into bondage, they have 10 different sites with bondage as the main theme.
I don't think it's updating. I accidentally forgot to cancel it and am on the second month of my membership. I haven't noticed any new scenes and there's not a tab for "updates". They have a good and different network here, but they do need to put a little work into making it more functional and easier to find what you're looking for. |
|
10-07-19 11:10pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
75
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One really great site (Mano Job) and two okay sites.
The network’s navigation is not conducive for counting models. It’s also not easy to count all the scenes. I am getting these numbers: Mano Job has 771 scenes, The Dick Suckers has 192 scenes and Mr. POV has 275 scenes.
The model list works well, where each model is listed with all of her scenes across the 3 sites. It just doesn’t have a way to view all the scenes together across the 3 sites. You have to filter down to the specific site or specific model.
This will be mentioned in the cons too. Most of the scenes I have watched or downloaded have 1080p and there is a filter for 1080p, but as other reviewers have noted there is recycling and when you use the 1080p filter, it gives you results across all 3 sites. This may be the most difficult site to review.
The scenes are enjoyable if you’re into handjobs and pretty and cute models teasing a man, sometimes adding a blowjob and sometimes more. |
| Cons: |
The navigation is getting a lot of mentions. It works well as long as you are trying to find what they want you to find. The tags give you results from all 3 sites. But you can’t view all the scenes from all 3 sites without using the tags.
No dates on updates and based on numbers from previous reviews there’s not only less scenes, there are some new 4K scenes added, which means they have removed even more scenes to recycle.
Finding any kind of consistency. There’s just not any. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been recommended to me by multiple PU members. I did not list this in pros, but I was able to also sign into the site No Way Am I Gay and there are a couple of other sites listed under their company’s name that you can also sign into, Chelci Fox is one too. I am not including those in this review. The Finishes the Job site shows 3 sites and those other sites look like they haven’t been updated in at least a decade even though I do like the No Way Am I Gay site. It is solo men masturbating which is my favorite niche, the video quality is just very poor.
Mano Job is the site I was told to try. It is a handjob site and the female models are mostly attractive. I do think some of them were or are well-known. What makes this handjob stand out is it has tags. Are you picking up on what I’m saying? Most handjob sites only have handjobs and wouldn’t need tags. This site adds butt teases, pussy teases, tit fucking (how they list it), jerk off encouragement which I continue to say is as arousing to women as men. They have taken the handjob genre another step and I do like that. There are even parts where the pussy tease slips and becomes vaginal sex for just a few seconds. The number of scenes is where it’s hard to complain, but also is disappointing. The last review by KayTBuffs listed the Mano Job scenes at close to 900. There are now 771 and according to the site’s page you open to it’s being updated daily. Older reviews even listed higher numbers of scenes. They do have 4K scenes, which do look new or newer, but in this case -- that just means there are even more removed scenes. It still does have over 750 scenes with downloadable videos and photos, making it a very large hand job site. The scenes are at least more than just a handjob too.
The site Mr. POV is okay. It’s a decent sized site and if you like POV-style porn you will probably like this site. I don’t see a big appealing factor in it unless the thinking is it’s for those who get tired of the handjobs. These scenes are hardcore sex scenes.
The Dick Suckers is the smallest of the sites and it’s a lot like Mano Jobs except it’s blowjobs instead of handjobs and there’s very little tease. The models are often on all three sites, especially the popular ones I recognize by name.
This takes us to the biggest problem. It’s a network with no way to see all the scenes in one place. It’s more like a hub page that you select a specific site from. It adds a new twist by offering tags. The tags show content from all three sites. If you select the “cumshot” tag, you will get scenes from all three sites. It seems like this is one of those “networks” where less is more maybe applies. If I select the 1080p tag, it gives me all the scenes from all 3 sites that have 1080p downloads. What if I just want the 1080p scenes from Mano Job? This does make it more noticeable that they are recycling. I tried using the 1080p tag. The results delivered rows of videos from all 3 sites. I then filtered to Mano Job with the 1080p filter set. It opened the results, but the 9th video doesn’t have 1080p. It only lets you use one filter at a time and it shows the recycling. The 4K filter shows a good amount of 4K videos with a total of 169 scenes with 4K downloads -- across the 3 sites, but if you filter to any of those sites, those 4K videos do not show up as the newest updates. There are even scenes with 720p maximum download resolution showing up as newer.
I am being fair with the score on a subjective basis. I am only really interested in the Mano Job content and it was my first time trying the site. Recycling is annoying, but I don’t think it applies on your first subscription. I do believe if you have been a member before you may not be as pleased with it as I am. |
|
08-09-21 03:21pm
Replies (0)
|
|
