Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
First BGG
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All-threesome site featuring two girls and one guy.
The site has been around for 11 years which could be as much of a con as pro.
There are currently 127 scenes with only 1 update per month.
Site navigates well which is to be expected of a site this size.
Newer videos include 4K.
Vendo is the billing processor and they are as easy to use as any biller, maybe easier if you have multiple memberships with them they all show up. |
| Cons: |
Eleven years as a site and it only has 127 scenes. If this site fits a niche you like you will be pleased with the selection, but you won’t get much new content once you download what you want.
It just seems like this studio doesn’t believe in filming any scenes with substantial length to them. Even with a third person added the scenes average 20-30 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
You get the picture with the title of the site. There’s going to be two girls and a boy in each scene. These are not your wilder threesomes. Some of the scenes do have the guy with one of the girls while the other girl sits on the other’s face, but a lot of just looks like two different girls taking turns with the guy. The scenes do feature a lot of double blowjob action if that interests you. I’m not really for sure what they are going for here since I see the word “passionate” a lot, but the actions don’t show that. These scenes are not bad, they just aren’t great. When you see the two girls in the scenes a lot of times you are going to think it’s going to be great. The guy is mostly a clod. He just lays there and lets the two girls take turns doing their positions with him.
You only have 127 scenes here with 1 new one added per month. That has been common for them for the 11 years they have had this site, as they average just a little over 11 scenes per year. I do prefer the American sites that do this same exact niche since you get more dialogue and longer scenes. Some of the scenes feel terribly rushed. The girls are cute in looks to very pretty. The guys are a hit or miss bunch with more misses than hits. They could do better with male model selection.
The newer videos have up to 4K unlimited downloads and streaming. They also offer the standards 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. The photos can be downloaded in zips. The con side of being an 11 year old site is the oldest videos are 720p max. Those also have 480p and 360p. I don’t mind 720p and often download that resolution, but it could be a problem for others. It seems to be a double whammy here since the site isn’t that big and the older content doesn’t even have 1080p or 4K.
However, I will say I like this site’s scenes better than the one on one sites I have seen on this network. Maybe it’s just the thought that more could happen even if it doesn’t?
I don’t think this site is enough reason to join the network, but when you combine it with the value of the other sites the network comes with it makes this site one of the better ones on the network just because it’s a little different and changes up their formulaic approach their other sites use so much. |
|
09-28-20 09:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
Fist Flush
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Women seeing how far they can stick their fist up inside themselves, sometimes with help from others.
Small but very good collection of 78 videos. They have updated as recently as August 2020.
Easy to use site with excellent video quality.
These scenes seem to take on more of a realistic feel to them. Maybe it's just me thinking a woman wouldn't be into this unless she was really into the scene?
I have only been a member of one other fisting site and have to say these models are much prettier than the other fisting site I tried.
Epoch is the payment processor.
Every scene has at least 1080p and 720p videos. Some of the newer ones have 4K. |
| Cons: |
The scene count could be higher, but this niche is poorly represented. Supply and demand thinking?
These scenes would be some of my favorites if the models talked much or explained what is going through their minds when somehow shoving their fist up their pussy and their other fist up their ass. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a pleasant surprise for me. As someone that works (sometimes) in sexual therapy, I can understand the need and use of extreme masturbation. Some of the content here goes into extremes I haven't seen one woman do to herself like the scenes with a woman fisting her pussy with one hand and ass with the other. Besides being extreme stretching in a relative area, it takes a lot of flexibility to pull that off.
I would like to see more of the solo scenes in this niche. There are less than 10 of the 78 videos here with a solo model. I can see the attraction, possibly the "heat of the moment" to be fisted when with another person, but the solo ones are as graphic and explicit as any porn. These scenes add draw even more interest with the pretty models. I am not saying this to be offensive, but I thought this was a niche more for the average or below looking models. I do not believe the low video count is a problem. That is combined with how pretty the models are. You just aren't going to find a lot of videos of very pretty models fisting themselves and each other. I talked about being a member on another site featuring fisting. I did not download any videos from it as I thought the models were unattractive. I will download at least half of the videos from this site.
The video quality couldn't be much better. Their oldest scenes all have 1080p, 720p and a few other smaller options including mobile, while the newer scenes offer 4K too.
This is a niche that I don't believe can be faked. There is a lot of realism in these scenes, very clear orgasms with some squirting too. While I do prefer the solo ones for the pure kinkiness of it, some of the scenes with two models also reach that high level of kinkiness. There are scenes where one model is fisting the other and starts giving her oral too while fingering her ass. I am thinking, "What more could she even do to her?" There are even cute moments when one model has a hard orgasm and you can see her laugh or smile like it embarrassed her. This was an overlooked site for me. It hits a happy medium between too kinky and not kinky enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it. |
|
09-08-20 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A big foot fetish site with an emphasis on regular foot fetish -- meaning the male and sometimes or female enjoy kissing, touching and licking her feet.
They have 618 scenes, each scene has a photo set and video. They add 1 new scene per week.
Includes access to Adult Time, it changes the original navigation and feel of the site, but works without any major differences or problems.
Someone at the site has a good, working knowledge of foot fetishism. There aren't a lot of male talents used on this site, but the ones that are seem to be real foot fetishists.
High production values for a fetish site. |
| Cons: |
General lack of reverse foot fetish content -- meaning the woman whose feet and legs are being licked, kissed and caressed is only aroused by being the one having it done to her. The women in the scenes seem to be as much into their feet as the men are.
Even as a reverse foot fetishist, I recognize the redundancy of a niche like this one.
I would be happier with it if they focused more on the legs and feet with clothing choices (hose, stockings and leggings) instead of having most of the newer scenes focusing on the bare feet and legs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Foot fetishists are viewed as strange. People generally believe a foot fetishist is someone that walks around with toes on their breath. A foot fetishist doesn't even have to include the feet. It can be the gait of a woman's walk that starts the attraction to her legs and on down, instead of on up.
The newer scenes are disappointing to me. They are shot from an already ready view. The woman is usually already out of her hose or stockings or leggings. A body part fetish -- in my opinion -- should focus on that body part and include what would be called "worship".
The worship here is relegated to kissing, licking, sucking on feet, legs and toes. Did they run out of fishnet stockings? Tight leggings that seduce the man from her ankles up to her knees and back down? It might sound like these are not legitimate negatives, but in a fetish of a body part, that body part should be the most wanted by the person fulfilling the fetish.
They do seem to put a lot of work, time and even money into the scenes, but they have also fallen into the "if ain't broke" mantra. I am sure there are foot fetishist that are happy with that. It just does not appeal as much to a reverse foot fetishist.
The producers of this site -- 21 Sextury -- also have the site 21 Foot Art. It has more content for reverse foot fetishists. This site is a good site for foot lovers. I have heard a lot of male foot fetishists love to see the woman alternate sucking on her own toes and the guy's penis. They feature that "position" in a lot of their scenes. I am surprised they don't have a category for it.
Four of the male actors are prominently featured on foot fetish sites -- Charlie Dean, Toby, Kristof Cale and Vince Carter. This is one niche that requires the male to do more than get it up, stick it in, last 20 minutes and give a good ejaculation. They have to be able to focus on the feet, legs and toes while doing all those other parts.
The female models are mostly very pretty, European and do at least enjoy having their feet kissed and licked. As someone that discovered their own interest in this niche, I sometimes wonder about he female model's enjoyment and real interest in the fetish. I am saying this is one time I would like to see the female models talk about which parts (toe licking/sucking, sole licking, entire leg licking) turns them on most, but their inability to speak English limits that interaction.
Minor improvements are needed, but most of those are subjective. It would rate a little higher if they relied more on clothes than shoes/strap sandals. It's a very good deal within an Adult Time membership. |
|
07-27-19 10:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
Frank's TGirl World
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Transsexual site, owned or managed by Grooby that is perfect for all genders including straight women.
The models vary a lot, but I mostly see Asians on the site. Asians are my preference in transsexuals.
Four to five updates per week, each includes video and photos.
A lot of very pretty transsexuals or T-Girls if you insist.
I was able to join through Epoch using Paypal.
Would the pun be too much to say loads of solo scenes? |
| Cons: |
They have some sex scenes with men. I keep waiting on the transsexual site that stays away from hardcore sex.
I don’t know how they would do it, but I would like to see the scenes be a little longer. Nearly all are under 20 minutes, and some are under 15 minutes. There was only one transsexual model I ever watched that was really good at showing her body. Some of these transsexuals could. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are a lot of different classifications for transsexuals. We have the transsexual, the she-male, the T-Girl, the Ladyboys and that’s why straight males have problems getting into this type of porn. They know that at least one of those classifications is more feminine. I don’t even know which one. I usually prefer Ladyboys. I do like a lot of T-Girls and even transsexuals. The She-Males in my experience are the more masculine types. You’re not going to see many masculine models on Frank’s T-Girl World. These are mostly very feminine, pretty t-girls, transsexuals and I have to think a lot of these models are going into transgender where they were born with feminine genetics, but called a male.
There is not a lot of story or plot to these scenes. The variety of models is impressive. The site irself say that Frank has been filming and photographing t-girls since 2002. From the United States to Brazil to the Philippines. You can tell, as with Grooby sites, that the producer and one in charge really enjoys filming transsexuals. That’s a big deal in this genre. I think it will become an even more important part of transsexual porn. It is becoming more mainstream. Some of the biggest networks in the world are now featuring transsexual scenes. Which means a change of pace for their producers that are used to filming the more “mainstream” porn genres. That’s a major advantage for this site.
I don’t know how much model and producer chemistry really matters, but I do believe if there was a problem between model and producer the scene wouldn’t be as good. These very feminine models do look like and act like they expect to be treated like ladies. Wallets are a lot easier to open than minds. Frank at Frank’s T-Girl World is very open to the transsexuals and t-girls. You get really good pictures and genuine smiles from the models. Some transsexual solo scenes are very flat to watch. The only excitement or tension you see in those is the model trying her best to cum and get the scene over with. Frank’s scenes have some teasing and it’s like the models are teasing Frank. I didn’t know the importance of model and producer chemistry until a few members here pointed me in the direction of ALS Scan and a few other sites that excel at on-screen chemistry between the model and producer. I do see that at Frank’s T-Girl World.
Adding that in with nearly 2,000 models, over 3,500 videos and over 700,000 photos, there’s a really good chance you will find some content you like. Even if the T-girl is taboo to you. I do believe sites like this one are the most important part of growing the transsexual genre. They tried to jump transsexual porn to mainstream and put it in the hands of producers that have not ever filmed transsexuals. A site like this one needs more attention despite the high price. It’s around $38 per month.
You shouldn’t have any concerns either. The support at Frank’s T-Girl World is run by Grooby and you can join using Epoch through Paypal. That is a potential problem with other transsexual sites that use billers no one has heard of. I go against all thinking when I say this next part. I like that a lot of these models are average or below endowment. It adds something to the attraction to the model. She’s not able to rely on the snake between her legs. There are still models with large endowment, but it’s not a requirement. The majority of the scenes are solo and that’s what I prefer with transsexuals. I never thought someone masturbating their dick could be sexy and seductive. Some of these transsexuals are sexy and seductive. In comparison, the transsexuals on Brazilian Transsexuals are more extravagant and in your face sexy. The T-Girls are more seductive about it. Even mysterious. One of the newest updates shows the chemistry. It’s of a model named Tan. She had a scene back in 2016, 6 years ago and you have to think she had a good experience, or she wouldn’t be filming with them again. My current favorite site of 2022. |
|
04-11-22 07:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
FTM Men
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I’m using FTM as the Bareback Plus hub for this review. Bareback Plus isn’t listed.
Six sites that include two relatively rare FTM transgender sites. It also has four gay sites with it.
Downloads cost extra but are worth it if you’re into the niches. Those can be downloaded up to 1080p.
Includes Jason Sparks Live which is one of the best amateur gay sites going.
Almost always has a $19.95 promo when you visit the site.
I don’t know if getting to see an obscure niche in porn and even in daily life is a pro, but you get that on this network. |
| Cons: |
It took the world of porn around 40 years to accept and like transsexual porn. Transgender is the next step and I’m thinking FTM will have the most difficulty unless from female users. I will try and explain it below.
Needs better pictures and zip downloads. The FTM niche would be a lot better with pictures. I know that videos are just pictures in action, but action kind of messes this niche up. Too much movement. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTM porn is Female to Male transition. The transsexual porn we are used to is Male to Female transition. FTM offers females the same shock and maybe giggles that transsexual porn offers males. In FTM we see a handsome faced male, sometimes has a beard, muscular chest, hairy chest, and masculine features all the way down the model’s torso. And then, there’s a pussy. How did that get there? I know from males that they had the same reaction the first time they saw a MTF transsexual. Pretty and feminine face, boobs, feminine torso, then a dick. How did that get there?
That is what FTM is. You can look at the previews of this site FTM or the other FTM site included Jock Pussy. Both of those will make understanding what I’m talking about a lot easier to understand. I have seen FTM models on standard transsexual sites. I haven’t seen full sites dedicated to the FTM models until this one and Jock Pussy. If you’re not confused, the “network” itself may confuse you. It comes with Jock Pussy, FTM, Jason Sparks Live, Bound Twinks, Twink Loads and Raw Fuck Boys.
It's a very rare niche in porn. I have seen it listed as unappreciated. You may not realize it, but what FTM porn equals is a dick having sex with a pussy. It’s gender bending. It looks like two men having sex. But one of those men is a biological woman. That’s why I don’t really see the addition of these two sites on an otherwise gay network. I consider it very interesting to watch. The FTM models can look as masculine as any man you have ever seen, but you can usually tell by their mannerisms and body language that their nature is of a female. If you think seeing a beautiful, slender transsexual is attractive, you may at least like to see these FTM models that are handsome and built like an athletic man with a pussy.
The two sites combined have nearly 150 scenes between them. The scenes are not much different. You do get some threesomes. Which can be really confusing but can also be very good. Often times, one of the models with a dick has to stand to the side and masturbate. The pictures are one of the big drawbacks of the site. This seems to be a niche made for pictures. The resolution is not very good and no zip downloads. You do have to pay extra for video downloads. I think the two FTM sites are worth it one time. It’s just so different than anything you’re going to see on other sites. Different doesn’t always mean good. Check the previews before joining.
I know this is an odd way to show a niche that this site and Jock Pussy cover well, but it is something I noticed in the scenes. If you like seeing a hairy pussy receiving oral, this site probably does that better than any. The models have the hairy hormones. Some of these FTM models are hairier than any male models I have seen. It almost feels more like I have joined a site for the educational reasons. The bonus, if you’re into gay sites is the partial network of 4 gay sites.
I don’t know who this type of porn is aimed at. I would recommend it to everyone just to see the looks of shock. Instead, I will say check out the previews. The quality of videos is very good with up to 1080p downloads. The site works well. I like it, but without any way to know if it’s updates or being able to see a pattern of updates, I don’t know if it has much long-term value. |
|
06-07-22 03:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.
Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.
Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)
Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.
Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.
Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.
Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model. |
| Cons: |
Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.
The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.
If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.
Filenames could be better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.
My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.
The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.
The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.
You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.
One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.
They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.
I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too. |
|
04-11-21 10:55pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
82
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The never gets old tutor teaches the student a few new things, niche.
Some of the scenes do a good job of depicting an older, dominant tutor with the submissive student.
There are 234 scenes with 1 new one added each month.
The female models are cute/pretty, the males are just okay.
Something I usually don’t notice, but this site has very good camerawork.
Photo sets are downloadable and videos are as well with no limitations. |
| Cons: |
When I said the guys are just okay, it’s mostly because they are using either gray hair color or wigs to make the guys look older.
No subtitles and no way for me to know what they’re saying. I guess they’re not studying English. |
| Bottom Line: |
This niche is almost always a popular one for me. I prefer the older man with younger woman scenes and this niche is made for that setup. Except when you see a male who looks like a 24 year old athlete with solid gray hair. Maybe it’s an older man that just looks a lot younger than he is. I do think they missed a good opportunity with this site. The scenes that involve any lesbian parts are threesomes with 2 female students and a male tutor. It seems like someone would have thought about making a female the tutor with a younger female student.
The site is good sized for this niche. The 234 scenes come with download options from 540p to 4K. The newer scenes only have the 4K option. The downloads are unlimited and also include a downloadable photo set.
The obvious problem is there is very little English. The problem I noticed more once watching the scenes is there are scenes where the tutor is already at the girl’s house and she’s in her underwear to start the scene. One of the threesome ones, the tutor is sitting between the two girls when the scene starts and both girls are touching him. Maybe they have been having sex for months, and that’s where the dialogue is missed. Tutors don’t just pop up on living room couches with boners.
I do like some of the scenes, but also find myself streaming them before downloading. This niche for me has a lot of potential, but the parts I listed above are how you lower the potential. They’re not even studying in most of the scenes. They are watching television. I would expect more spanking, more shows of dominance and submissiveness. And if the girl is going to make the first move how about a little seduction? In the couch threesome the one girl just slaps her hand on the guy’s dick. I still believe the site is okay. Most of the girls are cute. The guys are really just okay. They have a few scenes that have what looks like a real older man not one they have made look older. Those are the best scenes for me.
I would like to see sites like this one worry more about the production values than making 4K videos. It just seems like there is a lot of wasted potential. I would even prefer having English subtitles instead of 4K. If you have the time to go through and find scenes you know you will like it’s an okay join. |
|
09-28-20 10:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Gender X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Difficult to call this a transsexual site as the scenes vary (per partner), but each scene does have at least one transsexual in it.
Impressive 248 scenes with new updates 4-5 days per week.
Scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set.
The site is quite easy to use with a clear “videos” tab, a clear “movies” tab that groups the scenes into a theme, a “stars” tab that lists all the models and a “photos” tab.
I usually am more attracted to the ladyboy-style of transsexuals (smaller frame, usually Asian), but the transsexuals on this site are very attractive even though not really ladyboys.
Professional site design, easy to join and cancel. |
| Cons: |
It does look like this site is a blend of the transsexual scenes taken from all of the Gamma-owned sites. Some are from Evil Angel, some are from Adult Time’s Transfixed, and I am sure that’s why the scene number is high for a relatively newer site and the update frequency is very high for a transsexual site. There is a positive to this which I will go into.
I would like more scenes with transsexuals with females. This is always a con for me on transsexual sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
GenderX is what I am going to say is a compilation site of the transsexual scenes Gamma records. This is a positive in some ways. You can get the new transsexual scenes from Adult Time, Devil’s Films and Evil Angel -- as example, all on this site, without having to join Adult Time/Devil’s Films and Evil Angel. It also does seem to focus on the best scenes from their sites. It has the Adult Time produced series Transfixed on it as well as Trans Fluid. I don’t know what the regular price is. I joined it through an offer on Adult Time and it was only $9.95 with downloads. That’s a good price for this high quality content that can be downloaded.
The updates come fast with 14 in July. Quality is always an issue with transsexual sites. Not here. All 248 scenes have these download options: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I don’t think I have been a member of a transsexual site with nearly 250 scenes all with 1080p and 4K download options. The picture sets are a little underwhelming in resolution at 1920x1280, but these are legitimate photo sets with as many as 500 photos in each. The first 100 or more of the photos are of the transsexual model, posing and showing her body off in clothes or lingerie. I have noticed some of the photo sets only have 50-75 photos in each.
The sex is going to need mutliple explanations. There are gangbangs with 3-4 males with 2-3 transsexuals. There are scenes with transsexuals with men one on one. And there are scenes with transsexuals with women. These are of special interest. It’s very rare -- in my experience, to see “known” female pornstars with transsexuals. One of the newest scenes is of one of the few pornstars I recognize by name, Kenzie Reeves with a transsexual. That does add some interest for me. It looks like transsexual porn is becoming more mainstream and accepted.
There is a disappointment I don’t think is fair to list as a con. There is only 1 solo scene. Which is my favorite niche in transsexual porn. These are instead full-on hardcore sex scenes with transsexuals involved. The site has a lot of appeal for those curious about transsexuals. Most transsexual sites have one theme and stick to it: Male with transsexual, female with transsexual, and group scenes just aren’t that common in the transsexual genre. This site gives you all three.
It is all done on a professional site that is easy to use and has a relatively large selection of scenes. The site does have categories and you can use that filter down to your interest. I didn’t mention the categories as a pro or con. They are not correct. There are 248 scenes, but according to the categories there are only 8 “female fucks trans” and you will see the error they have made, there are 28 scenes of “trans fucks female”. They also only list 14 “trans fucks trans” and 45 “male fucks trans”. That’s less than 100 scenes. Who are they fucking in the other 150+ scenes?
It’s easy enough to just scroll through the scenes without using the categories. I will keep the score a little lower than it probably deserves. I did not realize this site uses scenes from other Gamma sites and the botched categories need to be fixed. It’s still worth joining if you’re curious about the different forms of transsexual porn. |
|
08-09-21 03:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Girl Cum
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredibly hot messy female orgasm site.
There are 66 models, some have multiple scenes.
69 scenes, probably the only time I will ever get to say that number in a review with two updates per month.
Reading all the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. I will leave it at that.
Video and photo quality is exceptional and are available in unlimited downloads.
Easy to cancel and navigate except for a few bugs |
| Cons: |
If you go to the model list it will show you 24 models, if you click to go to the next page it shows you the same 24 models as page 1 and if you click on page 3 it shows you the same 24 models from page 1. The dropdown box does work for finding all the models.
Upsells are everywhere. They also show you scenes from sites you don’t have access to.
Maybe it fits better in cons, reading the reviews by males talking about the female cum in the scenes is fake. |
| Bottom Line: |
I probably need to clarify my pro/con jabbing at the male reviewers for saying the female cum in these scenes is fake. It may be in some of the scenes, but from the looks of the scenes they are editing and cutting parts throughout the scenes. I am not -- as a woman, going to say the female cum is fake. It takes a very relaxed and aroused woman to produce a messy orgasm like is seen in these scenes. Some sex toys like the Magic Wand Plus are known, especially in edging a female, to cause very messy orgasms. What I notice is the women are usually very wet and starting to show messiness near the beginning of the scenes. That makes me think they are being prepped prior to the sex starting. There also is a lot of male giving the female oral sex before the intercourse starts. I am not trying to be hard on the male reviewers, but I can say women can cum that much. I am also not insinuating they are just not taking the females they have been with to that level. As I started this, I said the female needs to be very relaxed and aroused. A lot of women are insecure about showing that much sexual energy. Either way, I really love this site and hope it will update more once the pandemic is over.
This is a site that doesn’t really need stories or plots. It’s about the female’s pleasure. Which is different from 99% of straight porn out there. The models are all professionals. They are mostly young, though a few MILF models are present and they are believably horny. Despite little to no story there are scenes with extended setups like public masturbation and flashing before the scene starts. Which would also lend to the female being aroused before the guy even touches her. Is it really that hard for guys to believe a woman could get even more aroused about sex than a man does?
The site could be bigger though I picked the right time to review this since there are 69 scenes. I don’t think you will see many 69s, at least not in my memory of the scenes I have watched. With only 2 updates per month it will take a long time for this site to have a lot of scenes, but hopefully, they will stick to the current style or formula instead of making it less erotic just to produce more scenes. I will say there isn’t one scene I plan on skipping over.
The download options are another major positive. Each of the 69 scenes can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The pictures are not as impressive at 1500x1000 and the downloadable sets only have 30-50 pictures in them with most of them being taken during the sex parts.
The only thing I can find to complain about is the size of the site, but in my few years of experience of porn viewing and collecting, I usually look at a site’s size by how many scenes I want to download, not by how many scenes they have. Most sites I join, even ones with thousands of scenes, only have 50-100 scenes I download. This one has 69.
Highly recommended. |
|
09-28-20 10:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
Girls Out West
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great site for those that likes variety in female models. Probably the best, even.
Very large site that I have been a member of for nearly a year and still don’t think I have seen everything.
Higher quality than I initially expected, and it has been high quality for a long time.
Some of the most realistic porn I have ever watched.
The navigation is very easy, and the categories help you find anything you are looking for.
Besides being a large site, it updates 6 times per week. |
| Cons: |
The older scenes are lower quality and those are not even easy to find.
I don’t know that these are all amateur models. I recognize several of them and one of my favorites, I know she is on other sites. The amateur/pro label is probably stretched a little. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined Girls Out West, I really wasn’t for sure if I liked it. I do like a variety of models. It was one of the first sites I joined. I wasn’t really ready for this much variety. The variety is more than just skin complexion which they have a lot of different complexions. They also have very hairy models. They have heavier models, including close to Big Beautiful Women. It reminded me of a network that decided to stick all of its fetishes on one site. They do mix these models and types up. They will have a smaller woman with a big woman. A shaved woman with a very hairy woman. Kind of be prepared for that.
That is why I signed up for a year. The sex is very real. That made me want to see more. Over time, the model difference did not make much difference to me. I believe that is what they are going for. There are not a lot of stories or plots. It is more about emotion. This is advertised as a site owned by women and filmed by women. I don’t know how much difference that makes. I do see differences from regular porn. There isn’t anything robotic or planned. The scenes develop naturally. You don’t have that feel of “they have not done this yet; it’s going to be next”. You can’t do that on this site. I do believe it could throw your porn expectations balance out of whack.
The site size is very big and they have high quality. The videos have had 4K download option since 2017. They also offer 1080p, 720p and 576p. Even the 2012 videos have the 1080p and 720p options. They list over 2,000 videos that have at least 720p and 1080p. They do have picture sets you can download. I wasn’t expecting that the first time I joined it. I was thinking it’s an amateur site, they would not have high quality, but they do.
The part I was surprised by are the male with female scenes. There are not many of those. I didn’t expect any. I do not believe they are shooting anymore male with female scenes. The last I found was April 2020. Considering they update 6 days a week, I believe they would have had a new male with female scene if they were still filming that style. Besides being prepared for the variety of models, there are some things you have to get used to. Besides very hairy pubic areas some of these women have hairy armpits. That doesn’t bother me, but I know others have talked about not liking that. It is not something I find attractive, but with this style of porn, it is what they are going for. Very natural women and they are mostly all Australian. I have never been there. I don’t know if that is more common in Australia or not. Besides the small amount of male with female scenes there are some solo scenes too. I really liked those. The female models seem to be very comfortable and relaxed even going into the videos. I feel like I am getting a lesson in culture. The categories make this one of the few sites I have ever been on that the categories make sense and are accurate.
I always pay attention to the user ratings of scenes. I find that very interesting on these scenes. Some of the heavier models have solo scenes and are some of the highest rated scenes. Another blow to your porn expectation balance, the interviews are good and enjoyable to watch. Some of those have multiple females that are nude throughout the interview. They laugh, they touch each other and play around. My favorite scenes are the ones with more than 2 women. There is something about that I like. They do those lesbian threesomes better than anyone. My feelings on the looks of the models. There are some really cute and pretty females. There are some that look like normal, average women. I believe those will vary in popularity from person to person. I do believe that is what messed up my first time as a member. The combination of seeing the model as an average woman then seeing the huge pubic hair and hairy arms and armpits.
Besides that, the site is near perfect. I have heard the saying, your mileage may vary. I do believe the looks of the models could turn some people away. That is the double-edged sword of this site. Everything technical is right. I would recommend if you think you like it, join for longer than a month. The scenes can be long, the interviews are worth watching, especially if you like certain models that are in the interviews. I felt like it took me about 2 months to really like the site. It is now one of my favorite sites. I believe that is better than joining a site and being bored with it after 5 days. One of my favorites. |
|
03-20-22 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
86
|
Girls Try Anal
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The title could trick some, this is a lesbian site, the trying anal isn’t with men, but it is what I like about it.
Only 116 scenes, but I found around 80 of those worth downloading. It is not updating.
Explores the way I want to believe most women would want to try anal first, with another woman, a finger, a smallish dildo, not a 9 inch penis.
Video quality is excellent.
Very pretty models including a lot that I do know by name even though I don’t know a lot of models by name.
Also works in some older/younger fetishes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. This is a site I really like as my score shows. I would join a site like this for a year just for this content.
Some poor acting, often by the older female models, does take away from the believability of some of the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site does something most porn sites do not do. It takes a concept that is completely believable and makes it look like it’s really happening. I am basing that on the more exploratory sites. This is one of the most believable to me. A few models I knew by name Gia Derza, Nia Nacci, April O’Neil, who I believe is one of the best porn actresses in the lesbian genre. It’s nice to join a site with what I would call a small number of scenes at 116, but realize you downloaded more from those 116 than you did from a site with 4,000 scenes.
The scenes all touch on a curiosity and that curiosity is having their butt penetrated. Fingers, tongues, dildos all get some action. There is more to the scenes than just the woman getting her first anal penetration, not that I believe it really is their first. These are standard lesbian scenes with the guarantee of some anal play. These scenes are long to even very long. One is 75 minutes long. You get a lot of story, a lot of believable (for porn) nervousness, seduction leading to trying the anal and that to me, is doing porn right. It removes the feeling of they’re just doing it for the paycheck.
I could pick 40 or more of these scenes as my favorite scene. And that brings in the part I don’t like, it’s no longer updating. The last update was in 2020. The videos are high quality with all scenes having up to 1080p downloads and a handful having 4K.
I don’t believe porn makes enough exploratory scenes and other sites could benefit from looking into and considering adding exploratory. A lot of sites try it with the stepmom walking in with her stepdaughter trying to give a guy a blowjob or walking in on the stepdaughter trying to finger/masturbate herself. I don’t think those sexual acts are exploratory. Most of us figured out how to masturbate regularly or give a blowjob, or if a guy, how to give a woman oral. Having an older, more experienced woman walking in a younger woman putting a butt plug in her butt for the first time, that’s exploratory. I know many women who have never tried anything anal.
I do think there is a chance for disappointment with the site since I believe some will expect this to be guys with females having first time anal sex. Just from my experience and in talking to women, their first anal with a guy was accidental. Maybe this is too narrow of a niche to appeal to the masses, but it’s the very type of porn I look for and prefer.
The main deduction from the score is that it’s not updating. While I am happy with the scenes they have, this just seems like another wasted opportunity to make porn that gives you a specific niche you rarely see in mainstream porn. Maybe the actresses are just very good at acting and make it more believable. It would be one of my highest rated sites if it was still continuing to update. |
|
07-13-21 09:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Girlsway
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the biggest lesbian sites I have tried.
1,868 scenes with new scenes being added 3-4 times a week.
Video quality is great and continues to get better.
Picture sets are downloadable, but are small with less than 50 photos in each.
Has multiple niches within it and series or spoofs.
Solo scenes that are due to Covid-19, the girls film themselves masturbating at home. |
| Cons: |
There's not a dick to be found. At least not a flesh one, but plenty of fake ones.
Overacting, a lot of surprised faces at what's under another girl's panties. |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway does a very good job of splitting the sub-niches up and even have their sub-niches listed to explain them. There are:
Girls Try Anal, Mommy's Girl, Moms on Moms, Oral Experiment, Sex Tape Lesbians and True Lesbian. Besides those, they also have multiple series running at any specific time. These include Cougar Queen: A parody of Tiger King, there will multiple parts to it. Body Swap is one of their newer series that is good and has multiple parts.
My favorites are the Sex Tape Lesbian scenes. The girls play games like Dare Wheel and that leads to a sex scene. They have one that is nearly an hour long based around trying on bikinis. These scenes add enough story to make them more interesting than a lot of lesbian porn I watched. The models are very attractive. Those with the older/younger fetish they also have over 400 scenes of it with the story-driven, "Mommy's Girl" scenes. Some of the scenes are silly and playful like you would expect from a site like Team Skeet. One of the newer scenes in style has a hair stylist fixing one model's hair while the model is receiving oral from another female. They make it like the hair stylist doesn't notice at first.
They are uploading as much as anyone right now (lesbian) with an average of 3-4 times per week. The video quality on every scene has a minimum of 1080p as its highest option. There are also 720p, 540p, 480p and mobile download options. The most recent 365 scenes also have 4K downloading option. I am having a problem deciding if I like it better than Sapphic Erotica. I think I do. The amount of content is similar, but Girlsway has the added benefit of a story and some dialogue.
There also is more personality in the scenes on Girlsway. Scenes that probably make the girls genuinely laugh like 4 students touching each other while the teacher's back is turned. My second con is really the biggest one. There is a lot of overacting. Should a girl really be surprised another girl has a pussy too? The only reason I mention that is within 3 minutes the shock and surprise is replaced by the surprised one looking like an expert at giving a female oral sex. I can look over it (usually). The site is just one of the best I have reviewed. My interest in it does waver since I prefer a male in the scene. For lesbian fans I do believe this is one of the top 2-3 lesbian sites available. |
|
09-08-20 11:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Solo, extreme, gaping, pretty and sexy women.
Averages 3 updates per month. It looks like they could have more than that, but nothing consistent with the update schedule.
High quality videos and photos. All are downloadable and unlimited.
Very pretty models that I think are nearly all European. There are a few that may not be.
Bipolar porn, she looks innocent, she’s acting innocent, don’t stick THAT in there! She does it anyway. Somehow, these models do that in a pretty way.
Good navigation and tags, but they do have a lot of tags. The most I think I’ve ever seen. |
| Cons: |
It's no surprise this site is on Sapphix just like Sapphic Erotica and there is the white living room again. If a person recognized the background city, they could go watch these scenes in person. The windows have no curtains. It’s a joke, but the white background isn’t.
The scenes on this are different. A lot of the newer ones are just masturbation with some extreme parts. The older scenes are the most extreme masturbation I have seen. That’s going to be pro for some and a con for others. I don’t mind it, but believe it fits better in the cons. It’s not what you expect from solo porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I can set up the scenes on this site by saying the model will convince you she’s an innocent little dove (thanks all white background!). She will then tease and show a little skin. She will show how pretty she is. I look away and she has a baseball bat stuck up in her and her legs in a V. It’s whoa porn. You skipped some things on your way to that V. I like it just because it jumps from innocent to not innocent in a split second or V. The models look like they belong on a softcore, glamorous site. Seeing them with only their heels on and they left those on for grips. It’s a good change from sites that stay within the softcore niche. Yeah, she’s pretty, has a nice body, but I just don’t think a guy or woman is going to want her just teasing. I want to believe women this pretty make people want to gape them. That is a unique concept this site has going for it.
Its overall size is not as big as you might think. It “only” has 402 scenes and has been open since 2004. They had a lull in updates from 2009 to 2013. There is disparity between the newest scenes and oldest scenes. It really doesn’t seem like the same site even. I do believe just like with Sapphic Erotica, it’s the models that are making that difference. It could be production as well. There are some really pretty models in the newer scenes that do some extreme. I really like Candy Belle’s scene. It’s after the lull period. I know they have it in them to make the more extreme and even excited masturbation scenes. I never thought I would say a woman using a Magic Wand on her clitoris and has a dildo up her butt, was not extreme, but it’s not extreme in 2022. I think housewives do that now.
The quality is as high as I think you can get. Especially if you consider how long they have the high quality. You can go back before the lull and those still have 720p and 1080p downloads. They had 4K starting at the new year in 2015. The scenes are very long for solo porn. The Candy Belle scene I mentioned is 52 minutes long of her teasing, in the bathtub, on the bathroom floor, on a chair, using a Magic Wand, a very girthy dildo stuck to the floor, using the sprayer in the bathtub. She ran out of toys. You still don’t get the extremes that the old scenes had. The baseball bats, the needing an assist from another model just to get that bat in her.
It’s good for those that like solo, long and teasing scenes. They do a good job of showing how teasy the model is at the beginning of the scenes. That sometimes can last 10-15 minutes. I don’t know that everyone likes that. I do, but I like softer porn. I keep thinking I’m going to develop some of the teasing ability if I watch enough. I do believe the easiest way for me to describe is it’s different. I haven’t seen sites like this. The models do it all with a big, pretty smile.
It's a good site for when you feel like you’ve seen everything that porn has to offer which isn’t much these days. I’m sure that there was a reason, some demand even, for this site to be opened back up in 2014 after the 4 years of no updates. I have liked it the last few times I joined Sapphix. |
|
08-05-22 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful models stretching themselves out for all variations of masturbation.
Long, slow becoming fervor masturbation that clearly shows orgasms.
404 scenes with updates seeming to stop 2 months ago.
The site is easy to use with simple searches or complicated if you want to jump into the advanced search.
The scenes include a long video (by masturbation standards) and photo set. Downloads are unlimited.
No ads that I have seen. |
| Cons: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am newer to solo porn and see this as a con. It is a woman masturbating. That may be a con to some as there is very little variety.
The setting does not change for the newer scenes. It gives a samey feel to a genre that I believe already has a samey feel to it.
Inconsistent updates, I can't tell if they stopped updating or if this is normal for them. They have had long periods of no updates when looking at the past scenes.
Bottom Line:
I see this type of site as being something porn fans will either love or dislike, not hate. You are going to see a lot of spread pussies. There is some teasing. There is some anal play. There is a beautiful model in the same setting as the previous beautiful model spreading her pussy, teasing and possibly playing anally. Some of the models seem to be made for this kind of porn. Their scenes are very good. They love being watched, they love teasing, they love you seeing them having an orgasm. I think if that sounds good to you, you will love the site. If you need more than one person you will probably dislike the site.
It makes me think a site like this is where every gynecologist found their interest in becoming a gynecologist! I do see a site like this as female-positive. The models look stunning, you would not expect them to jump up in a chair and start spreading their legs looking like they do. They look more like they are going out on a nice date. Hopefully, someone bought them a nice dinner before they put on these performances.
The video quality is great, but inconsistent. Of the newest updates, two of the 4 newest do not have 4K, while the other 40-50 do have 4K. That makes me think they may have recycled old scenes. That was a newer term to me until recently. If you are interested in the 4K versions of these videos, you better have a lot of hard drive space and a fast internet connection as some of those are as big as 15 Gigabytes per scene. They do offer lower, in my opinion, better options with the 720p and 1080p versions. The photos add a nice touch. These photos show the model before the scene starts.
There are some unbelievable insertions, but those are in the older scenes. One has a woman masturbating with a baseball bat! The camerawork is a positive or negative for the site. There are a lot of close-ups. I believe close-ups during masturbation are only good if the model is rubbing her clitoris. If her fingers are inside her or a toy is inside her it doesn't make much sense to me to go close-up. I would classify this as a fetish site even though there are no definitive fetishes being played to unless, the pussy, is a fetish. All you need to ask yourself is do you want to look at 400 pussies? That is why I said I don't think any porn fan would hate the site. |
|
09-08-20 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Give Me Teens
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a blend of older/younger males with females and females with females.
The site currently has 1,408 scenes, but the updates have stopped despite looking like they were really getting going in March of this year.
Videos and pictures are downloadable for every scene.
Multiple niches are interspersed (interracial, threesomes, stepfamily)
Quality of videos is high with up to 4K on newer scenes
Most of the scenes are longer in length than expected (30 minutes plus) |
| Cons: |
It’s not as much of a problem with the male with female scenes, but it’s hard to tell which is the older female in some of the lesbian scenes.
There are minimal stories and mostly poor acting. The scenes seem older than they are, even the ones released in 2021. |
| Bottom Line: |
The size of the site surprised me. It could be advertised better. I did not realize it’s an older/younger site. The scenes do leave a little to be desired. The stories are needed in this type of scene. Just listing the title as uncle or stepbrother isn’t enough. It’s a combination of those two cons. It feels like if they put a little more time into the production values, they would have a really great site on their hands.
The mixture of niches makes the content interesting with interracial, lesbian, stepfamily, threesomes -- and it’s all under the older/younger genre. There is a good mix of ethnic groups, but it could be better in the interracial scenes. As nearly all are an older black man with a younger white woman.
The site has longevity on its side, but there is the downside to that too. The oldest content goes back to 2006. The 2006 scenes to the 2011 scenes have 240p, 480p and the 2009-2010 scenes added 540p, once into 2011, the 720p and 1080p options show up. I do not think I can really complain about that. It still has 10+ years of HD scenes. The picture sets are not a pro or con. They are there, most are very small (30 pictures) and the pictures do look like screencaptures from the video.
The updating schedule is where a problem shows up. From April 2021 to current (August 2021), there have been two updates. The month of March 2021 had 7 updates just in March. The older/younger genre does seem to be sporadic with updates, but this site looks like it has stopped updating for good with the last update being 3 months ago.
The size of the site helps make up for the lack of new updates with 1,408 scenes, which is one of the biggest collections of older/younger porn I have seen. I will add these scenes do not go as extreme in the age differences as a site like Grandpas Fuck Teens. These look more like the older one is 30s to maybe 50s with the younger one looking 18-24. The length of the scenes would normally make me think there would be more story and buildup in the scene, but there’s not much of either.
I do like the site. I just wish the scenes were put together with a little more thought. Some of the scenes are dangerously close to making me feel like I’m just watching any other genre or niche -- nearing the generic feeling level. I still believe it’s a good site for those who enjoy the older/younger genre and would recommend it to those who do. |
|
08-09-21 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
Glory Hole Initiations
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
A different type of Gloryhole site from their other Gloryhole.com site. Most of these scenes are a white male or multiple white males with black women.
Updates once per month.
345 scenes with downloadable videos and photos. |
| Cons: |
The site has gone through changes over the years with the older scenes being white women with white men. Those scenes also advertise the HD option, but they are not HD, they are 480p.
The 4K videos cost $3.99 per each scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
One part that impressed me about this particular site is the women seem to be more into the scenes than on the network’s other gloryhole site (gloryhole.com). The set for the scenes is also an improvement over their other gloryhole site which just uses a bathroom stall. This site’s sets look more like a changing room. Maybe I just think the toilet stall scenes seem unsanitary? There are also scenes on this site with not only multiple men (one on either side of the wall), but some even have two women inside the “room”. There are variations from scene to scene. The main focus is a blowjob and handjob, but most of the scenes -- especially the newer ones -- include full sex through the gloryhole.
The site is of good size with 345 scenes, but they only update once per month. It does seem to be one of their more popular sites based on the user comments left on the scenes. If it’s possible, I would even say the sets are more classy than their other gloryhole site. It has more of a good feel to it than their other gloryhole site has. The women seem to enjoy themselves. There is more of a positive feeling. That’s something I believe these gloryhole sites could look into. While their other gloryhole site tries to show more of a random situation where the unsuspecting woman is surprised by the dick popping through the wall, this one has more of a we planned it this way feel.
Similar to most of the other sites on this network, the older scenes have a high resolution of 480p despite claiming “Big HD” . The majority of the scenes do have 720p and 1080p. You still have to pay $4 per scene if you want the 4K version of the videos. I liked this gloryhole site better than their other one and think they should focus on updating this one as much as they do the other one. |
|
02-26-21 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
92
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the most infamous real sexual fetishes.
670 scenes with downloadable videos and photo sets.
Updates twice per month.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
628 female models on this site.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
As much as I like the concept and find it arousing; the scenes become extremely repetitive.
Similar to other sites on this network the older scenes are listed as HD, but are only 480p.
Gloryhole seems like it could be used in other ways besides a woman sitting on a toilet when a random dick pops through a pre-cut hole in the wall of the stall. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This could depend (pro or con) on the person watching the scenes, but you’re going to get what the title of the name of the site says and little else. This site has tried variations on the Gloryhole concept. Maybe I’m not as porn-smart as I would like to think? I would add a 3-5 minute segment before the scene starts where the female is outside the public restroom with her husband or boyfriend or even really go out there by having a lesbian couple. When the woman is securely in the public restroom and this stranger’s hard dick pops through the wall in the stall, she can’t contain herself. Maybe it’s because I’m female and I just see so many of the scenes on this network as being clearly male-orientated?
The variations they have tried include: Not just getting a blowjob through the Gloryhole. There is vaginal penetration in some scenes as well as anal in some. There are scenes where there are two guys, one on each side of the woman’s toilet stall. Those vary from her alternating blowjobs and handjobs between the guys to blowing one while the other has vaginal sex with her. There’s just something missing for me. This seems like an excellent opportunity to play into fantasies, to maybe even not have every scene turn into a blowjob/handjob/sex. As it is, the women are all shown as so horny they’ll suck a stranger’s dick. These models like many on this network or often MILF aged. I would like to see them get some younger female models and maybe add a touch of innocence. Like having the woman only being willing to give the stranger’s dick a handjob and letting him finger her through the Gloryhole.
The amount of content and continued updates does give the site value and it is at least different (until you’ve watched 50 scenes) than regular porn to appeal to almost anyone into interracial porn. This site itself, from what I’ve seen is close to all if not all, black guys with white girls. They have another Gloryhole site that switches it around. The word Glory being in the title can’t help but make me think this is a glorified blowjob site and a glorified hardcore site. The majority of videos do include 1080p and 720p downloads and it does seem unlimited in downloads. It’s becoming routine for the sites on this network, it’s a good, not great site. The repetitiveness is easily the biggest con on this site. |
|
02-26-21 05:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
93
|
Gloryholes And Hand Jobs
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller.
This is one of the “gay” sites on the network and it focuses on guys giving guys handjobs and blowjobs through gloryholes or just out in the open.
There are 86 scenes with downloadable videos and photos.
The site looks to update twice per month, if they’re being honest. |
| Cons: |
I don’t think the site is being honest. I have been told in the past to check the latest fact update on The Best Porn. This site was updated on The Best Porn in January 2016. There were 86 scenes which is the same amount there are now.
The biggest download resolution for any of the videos is 720p.
The scenes are redundant and I doubt would appeal to gay men or straight women.
The model list doesn’t work even though they have a separate “male” model list. |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
It surprised me when I noticed the “gay” sites on Dogfart, but it does look like they are recycling the content on this site and possibly have been for a long time. I first noticed the videos don’t have a higher download resolution than 720p and the newest one is listed as being released on February 19, 2021. Is there a period where we look over a site recycling? I don’t understand why they list this site as still updating since several of their other sites show that they are not updating.
The scenes I did watch were poor to average. I have joined a lot of “gay” sites over the years and can say this is one of the worst. The gloryhole scenes are set in a room with what looks like a 13 inch television from decades ago. The guy who is going to give the blowjob is in that room “watching” porn and masturbating. He doesn’t seem to notice the hole in the wall right beside him until a dick pops through it then it turns into a very standard and basic blowjob/handjob. I don’t believe women are better at this type of porn, but if you watch the gloryhole scenes on this network with women they are much better than the ones with the men being the one giving the pleasure.
There are 86 scenes. The same number there was in 2016 and they do still advertise these scenes as being newly updated. The download resolution options are: 384p, 432p and 720p, all three files have 720p in the filename. There’s just a lot of dishonesty going on with this site. I felt like reviewing it would at least tell those interested in the “gay” sites on the network don’t join just for the gay sites. I’m not for sure what the ratio or interest level of gay men would be towards this network. I have read a few reviews here about gay men enjoying gloryhole porn even it’s a woman pleasuring the man. This site is the bottom of the Dogfart barrel. |
|
02-26-21 05:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photos only site with nude but not very explicit, tasteful photos of beautiful models.
Total of 2,495 photo sets and 1,072 models.
Currently averages 9-10 updates per month.
Model list and favorites section.
Photos are downloadable in zips, newest sets are 3700x5800 in resolution. |
| Cons: |
No videos with the site.They have videos, but they are staff selection videos and cost extra to download.
For a photos only site some of the photo sets are very small (30 pictures)
Most models are nude for the entire set. |
| Bottom Line: |
This seems like a site that would have been popular 10 or more years ago. The models are pretty, though hardly no variety in model types, race or body types. The photos do go fully nude, but they are not very explicit unless you consider a butt hole explicit. I noticed their updates have slowed considerably over the years. From 2018 to late 2019, they have dropped from 24 updates per month to 8-9 updates per month.
The pictures are very good quality at over 11px with 3700x5800 resolution, but the lack of videos and slowing of updates does cause some longtime concern for this site. The scenes feel like they lack imagination or vision. A lot of the poses are what I would call "non-sexual" as there's very little touching of themselves in these sets. The site is at least big with nearly 2,500 photo sets and over 1,000 models, but at times it doesn't even feel like porn. It's more like watching a woman walk around naked for no apparent reason.
The inclusion of a films tab made me think they have videos, but they do not. The films are Staff Selection and cost $3.99 to $4.99 each to view and download. You can watch a free 30 second clip of each. I was most surprised by how small some of the photo sets were, a full photo set with only 32 photos on a site that has no videos? That would be my biggest suggestion. Have larger photo sets (200-300 photos) to make up for the lack of videos.
You shouldn't have any navigation problems since there's only updates, model list and photos to go through. My overall feeling is it's not a complete site. There's something missing, more pictures or any videos. As it is, it's a back to the basics very soft photo site that doesn't even bring in many clothing fetishes. I thought this was a site like Bare Maidens where there's more of a theme to the photo sets. |
|
12-09-19 09:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
95
|
Granddadz
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Older men with much younger women.
Some of the females are very pretty. I think that’s not as common in this niche.
283 scenes including a video and photo set.
Newer downloadable scenes have 4K video.
Updates had stopped from May 2020 - August 2020, but a new update arrived on August 30th, 2020 and 3 more new scenes came in September.
Better performances than I expected from the old guys.
Pictures are downloadable. |
| Cons: |
Lack of story with the scenes.
The search features are limited to using tags. Some of the tags are overused or overlapping which means I could be missing out on other scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest surprise with this site is the quality of the female models. I do not know any of these models by name, but thought Freya Dee, Adelle Sabelle, Sher Vine and Ava Black are all very pretty and gave excellent performances in their scenes. Two of those newest four scenes feature Freya Dee. She should be a star if she isn’t already.
I usually don’t have a big problem with search features, but I will mention the overused and overlapping tags. It’s common for scenes to have these three tags:
Old Guy, Old vs Young and Young Old. My problem there is all of these scenes are supposed to be older men with younger women. The tags could be more spread out. Just like having: Handjob and Masturbation. With the scenes only having 8-10 tags and up to 5 of them being the same or similar to the other tags it lightens your ability to search. Besides the tags they have a box to type in.
While there are 283 scenes, I am estimating that 80 of those are called bonus scenes. Those 80 are stream-only. All of those 80ish are not old and young. These are mixed in with the downloadable scenes.
The newer scenes offer 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The photo sets are also downloadable. The oldest scenes offer 540p, 720p and 1080p downloads so there’s not a big dropoff in quality even in the oldest ones.
I wouldn’t complain about the missing story with each scene, but the description of each scene doesn’t even help. Why is that incredibly hot early 20s young woman in the bed with a man old enough to be her grandfather? That’s all I need is one short description.
The updates stopped for 4 months, but they have updated 4 times over the last month. This is one of the larger collections I have seen of older men with young women and even though there isn’t any story some of these scenes are very good.
You also receive access to a large stream-only portal that has over 10,000 scenes. You can check out their other old/young sites there and watch the scenes to see if their other sites are worth joining. I like it well enough to recommend it to those who enjoy the older man/younger woman niche, especially if you like an age difference that looks to be as high as 40-50 years difference in some of the scenes. |
|
10-06-20 12:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Grandmams
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is not the older/younger I am used to. This is older women with younger men and younger women.
Pretty big site for older/younger with 216 scenes. It updates weekly.
This has some much older women in it. It even has one pegging a younger man while another younger man is giving her a rimjob.
Very good video quality, a lot of the scenes up to 4K.
The site is easy to navigate and the tags are good. |
| Cons: |
I have to think some of this is not going to be attractive especially to younger men viewers. Some of these women look close to 70. Most of them don’t.
The scenes are not consistently creative. A lot of them are just very standard sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
My thinking when I watch older men with younger women is I don’t judge the older men’s performance. I’m impressed they can even have sex. These older women are just as active and physically capable as younger women. There are some that like I mentioned, look in the upper 60s, those are not as active. I believe some of these women are sunburn old. If you know what I mean? I don’t know that I believe these are much older women. I believe many of them are probably around 50. A woman can definitely be a grandmother at 50. I see my grandmother who is in her 80s. It’s kind of like the Milf category.
The scene that really captured my attention has an older woman and she is one of the ones that looks older. She has a younger man bent over a toilet while pegging him and has another man giving her a rimjob. That’s not something you see everyday in porn. I was surprised by the number of scenes at 216 and with the weekly updates. Most of the older men with younger women sites do not update much. I always think that is because of age and inability to perform that often.
The biggest complaint I have is a lot of these scenes are just too straightforward. I don’t think I would want a story with grandmother seducing grandson. The scenes that are straightforward the only difference between those and any porn scene is it’s an older woman. There is not as many group or threesomes.
They do have some with younger women with the older women. I don’t like admitting this, but I do not find older women that attractive sexually. The site is not bad. It could play into fetishes, but I also haven’t heard many younger men say they fantasize about much older women. There’s always a few. I believe the older women works better with the younger women than younger men. The ones with the younger women those could be realistic enough to believe. They are teaching the younger woman. That is the bad part about my job. I know and understand human nature. The hormones and emotions. It’s hard to even fantasize that the nurturing grandmother seduces a young man. You need more story in these scenes. Just some kind of build-up to show the older woman has something happen that makes her aroused, and she justifies sex with the younger man in her head. Men do not have that problem. I am sorry if I am picking on men. But it’s true. Men say, “She bent over in front of me”.
The site is fine, though. It has very good quality videos and like I said, a lot of these women are not that old. Some of them even have fit bodies. It’s a different take on older/younger for me. I really like the older man/younger woman scenes. |
|
01-12-22 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Grandparents X
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is how you do older/younger porn. Some of the scenes are foursomes between an older couple and younger couple.
There are 63 scenes and videos can be downloaded.
The look on a man’s face who looks to be 70, getting a double blowjob from a woman that looks 22 and another that looks 30. That has to be the most real emotion I’ve ever seen in porn.
Videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K.
Updates 1-2 times per month. There are way too many morbid comments to add to that.
The scenes look genuinely fun. Especially for the old guys. |
| Cons: |
They need more updates.
The scenes could be longer.
Wondering how some of these oldest guys on these sites can even perform. These are the oldest looking guys I have seen on a site and I’ve told before I like older/younger porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
Being from India, age is not considered as big of a deal as in the United States and a lot of my earliest sexual thoughts were of older men. Some of the men on this site look like the dad’s of the older men my sexual thoughts were about. We have the big bellies, the white hair, the white eyebrows, the white beards and white chest hair. The big, saggy, floppy balls and somehow the hard as a rock dicks.
The scenes are not as creative as I think they could be. Most of the scenes are just an older woman, a young woman and a much older man. The scenes that I enjoyed the most are the ones with an older couple and younger couple. They switch partners and you have the moments where the younger woman is riding the older man while kissing the younger man who has the older woman in doggystyle. I just don’t think you are going to see that very often on porn sites.
There is very good video quality. All 63 scenes have 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. The oldest scenes makes me think they started out with the plan of this being an older/younger lesbian site. Those oldest scenes have 2-3 women and at least one is young, while the other two are older. I like this male/female style better. I believe if it was all foursomes with the swinging thrown in it could be even better. That could be an advantage to using the older guys. They can’t move around a lot. Everyone fits in the camera.
I do not know any of these models, male or female. Some of the older/younger scenes this studio makes include bisexual actions between the guys, but I haven’t seen in any of these scenes. They use Dirty Gunther in a lot of their group and younger/older scenes. He’s one of the main ones that does the male/male bisexual action. I haven’t seen him in any of these scenes. One part that’s not a complaint at all is they have some “older” men that really look more like late 40s, early 50s, which is an age range I’m usually attracted to in real life. I think that age range has landed in the tweener role now. Not quite old enough to fit the traditional older man scenes, not quite young enough to fit the standard male role in porn.
I liked it and would recommend it for those into older/younger and/or swinger porn. |
|
12-08-21 07:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It happens once a year, I get in the mood for older/younger porn and this site is another one I believe gets lost in Adult Time.
469 scenes including videos and photos.
Good selection of "grandpas" with most of the males looking old enough to be the female's grandfather.
Access to Adult Time
Newer scenes have 4K downloads if you buy the download subscription, also 1080p, 720p, 540p and on down. |
| Cons: |
Not all the grandpas look like grandpas. Is it really that difficult to find older men to have sex with young, beautiful women?
Only updated every other month.
I know it's not this site's fault, but the Adult Time navigation causes problems for me even when writing this review. |
| Bottom Line: |
The attraction of seeing older men with much younger women is one I have. It is strong enough, about one month each year, I only join sites with older men with younger women or younger women with older women.
I am going to explain that last con to show why I get so frustrated with these Adult Time sites. I was trying to find this site from the search box on Adult Time, "grandpas" was not bringing it up, "fuck teens" was not bringing it up. After 6 clicks, I finally found those sliders where I had straight sex on "do not show". I spend more time on these sites trying to fight with the navigation than downloading porn. Good business move, but annoying for the consumer.
I also do not list their 300GB per day download limit as a con. I don't think I have ever downloaded 300GB in a month.
Grandpas Fuck Teens could use some more fun and playful storylines. This is a niche that could be very fun and kinky. The scenes are a little shorter than I Ilike with most being under 25 minutes and some even below 20 minutes. That's usually the clue there's not much story. I am going to name the "grandpa" who I believe hurts this site, David Perry and any of the others who look, are built like him. Give me the white beards, the white hair, the fat bellies, the white chest hair. Those other guys look like they may be 15-20 years older than the females. Maybe I'm wrong and paying them a huge compliment? It's the visual and the mental part of this niche. To see the gorgeous, young woman looking at what our societal norms say is an unattractive man and she looks like she loves the sex with him. This is the one niche I don't believe "great performances" are needed in. And it's because of the white beards, white hair. Just seeing them get aroused and staying aroused shows the validity of the sex.
The download options are good, I either download the 720p or 1080p, depending on if I think I will really like the scene or not. I'm usually wrong on that attempt at prognosticating.
The scenes themselves are going to be limited by the mobility of the grandpa. I believe that's a strength. They're not switching positions every 5 minutes. The scenes even offer some excitement for women like me. I don't say it much, but the cumshot is one of my favorite parts. With the grandpas, any kind of cumSHOT is exciting. And you don't have the letdown if they just dribble cum since that's the expectation for their advanced ages. I usually would not directly recommend a specific scene, but the one between Bruno SX and Anastasia Brokelyn, titled "Keep Me Hot" is one of the best porn scenes I have seen from any site. He doesn't reach the exciting cumshot, but the cowgirl part of the scene on the couch is incredibly sexy as is her energy after that part. She is practically begging for his cum by the end of the scene. Maybe she has a month every year where she finds the older/younger category more interesting and it happened to be that month for her when she filmed that scene.
I do believe this is another Adult Time site that could be justified as a standalone site, but only as a one or two time join since the update rate is only one new scene per two months.
I am of the belief that Adult Time is stronger in its parts than sum. This site is one of those strong parts. |
|
06-08-21 10:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
99
|
Grooby Archives
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If Grooby Girls is a good place to start when exploring transsexual porn, Grooby Archives is an even better second step.
Not really an archive by the definition I know of archive, updates 3 times per week. It’s more like a growing compilation site.
The best way to experience multiple Grooby sites without having to join them all. You get content here from Black TGirls, Brazilian Transsexuals, Grooby Girls and my favorite Ladyboy-Ladyboy.
Video quality does vary since the scenes are compiled from the other Grooby sites, there are a lot of HD downloads and some 4K.
Even bigger than Grooby Girls with over 8,000 models and over 40,000 videos. There are also over 2,000,000 photos.
Easy click tabs to switch from site to site so you can develop your preference. |
| Cons: |
Not for everyone, I believe it can appeal to all genders, just not all minds.
Maybe this site works against the other Grooby sites? It’s nearly enough to get the most popular content from four or five of their regular sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
While it’s not my favorite of the Grooby sites, this is the best value of the Grooby sites. You get to experience the different ethnic groups and still get a lot of content too. The video resolution shouldn’t be too big of a problem for most. I believe with the way they update this site the video resolution inconsistency can’t be avoided. I would recommend the site use a different name. Not being a native English speaker, the word archive, to me, means not updating, some place to store the older content. That is a porn-influenced definition. I would call it, “The Best of Grooby”. I don’t know if Grooby would be concerned that would make their other sites not look as good. I will say I avoided joining this site before this time. I just thought it was an old site with old content.
It does update, 3 times per week – on the same day. If you time your joining right, you can get a 5th update day in one month. Like the other Grooby sites there is a blend of action between solo and hardcore. I have said in the past, there are not enough transsexual with women scenes. There are a lot of solo scenes. That offsets the lack of with female scenes for me.
There is the other side to this site’s existence and importance or lack of. There’s a chance if you have been a member of the listed Grooby sites, you will have this content. I haven’t really run into that or experienced it much, but it has to be possible.
The best way to describe the Grooby scenes is by saying if you need a story, you’re in the wrong place. If you need a plot, you’re in the wrong place, too. If you want to look at the transsexual models in good pictures, the Grooby sites do transsexual pictures better than anyone – in my opinion. If you want to see the transsexual models masturbating and having very basic sex, they do that very well. They also offer you variety, especially on this Archive site. You have the white transsexuals that I associate with United States, parts of Europe and the UK. You get the black transsexuals. You also have the Brazilian transsexuals and the Ladyboys are usually from Asian countries. That is an advantage to me. I would feel the same way if I was watching regular straight porn. Seeing the different looks and complexions does add value for me. I think when you join a transsexual site whether you are a straight person or not, there is some newness that you don’t experience in most porn. Being able to see different types of models lets you decide which ones you like.
The site does work well, all things considered, it is a really big site. You can even see what I see and talk about just by joining this site. You can go from the archive content of Grooby Girls to the archive content of Ladyboy-Ladyboy and see how much difference there is in the way the models act. It makes Grooby Girls seem like the casting site for them. They do have some post-ops as well. I don’t really get into that, but it’s interesting. There is at least one major transsexual model that recently went through the sex change operation. I have seen her on other transsexual sites as a post-op. She is in one of the newer scenes on Grooby as a pre-op.
Overall, this is a very good site to join if you’re comfortable with transsexuals and are wanting to experience different types of transsexuals to develop your preferences. If you need one more reason to join it, it’s a little cheaper than the other Grooby sites, which I would call good marketing. This could be a site to get people more interested in the sites the archives draw from. I haven’t seen many promos on Grooby. I paid $29.95 for the Archives. The others are around $38. |
|
04-11-22 07:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
100
|
Grooby Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Promoted as the longest running Trans Adult Website. I don’t doubt that.
Updates five days per week.
It also has to be one the biggest transsexual standalone sites. It has over 6,500 videos.
I signed up through Epoch by way of Paypal.
Scores points as likely a site that truly loves transsexuals and isn’t just in it for the money. They are currently celebrating their 25th anniversary. I can see that love in the photos.
4K videos going back to 2018
Hardcore and solo scenes with solo being the dominant genre. |
| Cons: |
The love of the transsexual models also shows with some of the selected models being ones I wouldn’t have filmed.
Grooby should be celebrated for their longevity, but still believe they have too many sites that require separate memberships. I spend my whole porn budget for a month just on Grooby sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
I hope my bank doesn’t notice all the charges to Grooby. I did this 2 years ago and decided to do it again with a month of Grooby sites. Not a lot has changed on this one. It is the main Grooby site. I said it before, this is a really good site for someone new to transsexual porn. You do get the blend of solo and hardcore. You see a variety of models and dick sizes. You also get the different quality implants and real, hormone-filled boobs. There is so much content with over 6,500 downloadable videos. The photos also show a different look at the models compared to most transsexual sites. These photos remind me of a site like Met-Art or any of the sites that put a premium on their photos. There are not many transsexual sites that do that. I appreciate that they do. It does lead me into thinking this is a site that is very much open to all transsexuals. That’s going to be a problem for any porn site. Do you remember the first time you saw Bruce Jenner as a woman? I think that’s all I need to say. It does apply to some of the transsexuals on this site.
Seeing that I’m a straight woman with too much curiosity, I don’t know if that look is more appealing to transsexual fans. I don’t hold my honesty back. I like transsexual porn because it’s the best way to find dicks being masturbated in porn. It is difficult not to pay attention to anything else. Because of that, I believe there is a group that loves the face and overall body of the transsexuals and that’ okay with me. I just like to see prettier transsexuals. It’s a strange fetish of mine. There are all kinds of pretty transsexuals on this site. That works against the more manly-looking transsexuals. At least for me.
The quality is very good, but this is the site I was trying to think of when I talked about in another review, sites having unexplainable changes in video quality. They have 4K back until the early part of 2018 available for download. In just 2017, they didn’t have 4K, but they had 720p and 1080p. Before 2017, there are no 1080p videos. The 2016 and back are topping out at 720p. As someone that has been a member of multiple Grooby sites, this site is starting to feel more like a primer for their other sites. The scenes are short. There is not much story or theme to the scenes except sex. I believe they are going for that on this site. It’s more of a showcase that shows off the different looks of a transsexual and shows Grooby is not against any look or even subjective “quality” of the models’ looks.
It's an easy site to recommend. It just wouldn’t be my first choice. It reminds me of Nubiles if talking about solo and teen female porn. There’s not much sexual tension in the scenes. The solo scenes on this site just look like a transsexual casting to show that everything works. I do prefer several of the Grooby sites over this one. That could have been a con. The prices on these sites are high, in the $30-$36 range per site. I do want to reiterate that I believe this is a great site for someone new to transsexual porn and wanting to experience the different types of transsexuals. I don’t think it’s even a top 5 site for transsexual fans. The other Grooby sites are better for those that have more of defined taste that they prefer in transsexuals. There isn’t much to complain about other than subjective taste. I do believe that’s a problem with reviewing porn sites. We have that score up there that we judge the sites with. I like the site. I like seeing the promotion of transsexuals. The positive promotion. It doesn’t strike me as hot porn. This site feels more like a meet and greet. Grooby hurts themselves there. They have sites with sexual tension. It’s a good starting point for someone interested in transsexuals. |
|
04-11-22 07:15pm
Replies (0)
|
|
