Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Slut Inspection
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Multi-site teen network of 6 sites.
Current deal gives access to the 6 sites of the Slut Inspection network and the classic site Teen Dreams.
Multiple updates per week.
High quality downloads of videos and pictures.
Nice 4K videos
Network is dedicated to following a husband and wife seducing teens to swing with them. Similar to the Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity sites. |
| Cons: |
Pictures should be more of a focus and better quality.
Way too many ads!
Site is clunky, maybe because of all the ads? |
| Bottom Line: |
I was wanting to join Teen Dreams, it’s one of my all-time favorite porn sites, but when I went to register, there was an offer for Teen Dreams and the Slut Inspection network for one price.
The biggest pro is how nice the videos look on a 4K monitor. The content is reminiscent of Teen Fidelity/Porn FIdelity. A married porn couple goes out looking for teens to swing with. One surprise is, the wife is the camerawoman. It’s not a new idea and it’s in a small field dominated by the Kelly Madison network. It is hard to watch these scenes without thinking about the Teen Fidelity scenes. Or even comparing it to Teen Fidelity.
The network, if it really is a network, blends 5 sites that are closely related. The sites – Slut Inspection, Teenage Tryouts, Wife’s POV, Sluts POV and Slutty BBW are all similar to one another.This is a sticking point in this review. The network as a whole has less than 200 scenes. I’m not real familiar with the Full Porn Network, but it does look like they either run this network or own it and are known for stretching the word “network”. Other than that, it’s not a bad site.
None of the sites stand out from the others. It feels like I’m watching the same porn with one or two differences, usually based on the models’ physical appearance or angle of the camera. I was also surprised there isn’t more of a focus on photos. It seems like pictures would add to the realism of the niche. Maybe have the teen models send nudes to the married couple? Just something to give it a less contrived feel.
At least the quality is good and the site is easy to navigate. I’m admittedly, not attracted to BBW models, the Slutty BBWs site is of no interest to me. The rest of the “sites” are above average, but be warned, if you’re used to the Fidelity sites by Kelly Madison, it could hurt these sites for you.
The addition of receiving Teen Dreams saved this network for me. I can honestly say I wouldn’t join this network if not for it being included in a promo special of Teen Dreams. |
|
03-06-23 07:08pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
27
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites. |
| Cons: |
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art. |
|
02-08-23 06:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Anilos
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Take the best of Nubiles, age the models about 10 years and you have Anilos.
Over 3,500 videos and picture sets
Everything can be downloaded and there are no limits.
Smooth user experience in every possible way.
Is a perfect polar opposite to Nubiles.
Tags are useful |
| Cons: |
The most obvious is these are not young models. I believe if you’re looking into this site you’re aware of the content.
Is inherently repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubiles was the first introduction to porn for many of us, but Anilos – also ran by the same people who run Nubiles, is vastly underrated. While I’m not a major fan of older women or even MILFs, the content here is excellent as is the quality.
Anilos has over 3,500 videos and 3,500 picture sets. Every new update has a photo set and video. The picture set is not videocaps from the video. It is a professional quality photo shoot. The folks running the site make sure you’re satisfied. They offer downloads of the picture sets in multiple resolutions and downloads of the videos in multiple resolutions. They even offer billing from CCBill or Epoch, your choice. This site along with Nubiles should be known as the People’s porn sites. They really go above and beyond to make their customers happy and succeed for the most part.
Anilos is not much different than Nubiles. The models are older. That’s the whole difference. The scenes are mostly showing off the model in her clothes, then her panties and bra, then fully nude. There’s nothing fancy about it and no secrets waiting to jump out. I call it the polar opposite of Nubiles because both excel at bending our age perception. Nubiles models often look barely legal while Anilos models don’t look much older than teens. They do take some liberties with the definition of MILF. Some of the models are only in their 20s, but there are quite a few in the 40s and 50s range too. The main sexual action you are going to see is masturbation. There is hardcore, but it’s not common and it’s not a focus.
The picture sets are as good as the videos and often show poses you may not see in the videos. It’s a great user experience overall. The navigation is seamless and identical to Nubiles if you’ve been a member of it before. The tags are useful and accurate enough. There are new updates and a massive collection in the back catalog. You just can’t go wrong with Anilos unless you don’t like slightly older women.
I feel like I’m being greedy saying there should be some bonus content, but I only say that based on the limited genres Anilos features. Just something with something different than solo women would be enough. |
|
01-10-23 06:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network that can be exceptional and at other times – unfullfilling
Comes with access to 7 sites
Each site’s name tells what you’re going to see (genre/niche)
2,500 videos and photo sets across the network.
Exhaustive navigation and tag search that can be intimidating.
High quality photos and videos that can be downloaded without limits. |
| Cons: |
Doesn’t look like any of the network is updating, but I could be wrong.
Each of the sites has videos that are cold and distant
Though it’s a network you’re really only getting 8 genres. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first things to know about Perfect Gonzo is it has undergone some changes. Give Me Pink is no longer included. The other sites are All Internal, Prime Cups, Sperm Swap, Cum For Cover, Tamed Teens, Pure POV and MILF Thing. All of those sites feature content that matches the name of the site.
All Internal is 100% creampies. This is one of the biggest and oldest sites on the network. Prime Cups is female models with near perfect boobs. Sperm Swap is multiple women swapping the sperm from a shared guy. Cum for Cover is more cum fun and play. Tamed Teens goes into minor BDSM and submissive young women. Pure POV is 100% POV scenes and MILF Thing features a MILF in every scene. Pretty simple and basic way to run a network. You really wouldn’t think they needed much in navigation since each site follows the same theme, but they not only have navigational options, but may have the biggest tag system I’ve ever used. They have levels of tags that include everything from the location (living room) to what part of the living room (couch). You can search these and trim it down with further options. If you searched for living room scenes, you could then filter it down to blonde models in living room scenes or big boobed models in living rooms.
The quality is very good, but it also offers the problem the network has. Everything starts to feel mechanical. Maybe would be better to say paint by numbers? The scenes are about the same time length. The genres do not change unless you switch to another site and the location looks like the same house or houses.
The network is the same way at times. It seems like scenes are the same over and over and the problem with that is the scenes are good. It’s a strange situation you don’t see often in porn sites.
Even with the downsides, the network is still recommended, especially for those who have never been a member on it. I do think it would be better and score higher if it still had Give Me Pink on it, but you have to join Sapphix to get it now. Perfect Gonzo likely didn’t fit the Give Me Pink theme as it is a solo site. Gonzo usually involves multiple people. |
|
01-10-23 06:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Kink.com
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The preeminent collection of bondage and BDSM sites.
90 channels though all are not Kink owned and operated.
Extremity is different for each person, but nothing on Kink reaches what I consider incredibly extreme.
The Kink sites are all of high production and offer top shelf porn.
Usable user-interface.
Satisfying user-experience.
Closest we will come to real reality porn. |
| Cons: |
Transsexual and gay channels won’t appeal to some people, but on the bright side, there are sites from all sexual orientations and genders.
Many sites are not updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
After 12 years of being an avid member of the Kink sites, it is finally time to try and be unbiased and fair in a review of it. All of the Kink channels follow a similar formula. The videos – unless remastered – are a high quality high definition resolution of 720p and nearly all videos on Kink sites last nearly or more than an hour. Photos are not a priority, but most of the scenes offer a downloadable photo set. The themes include BDSM, non-offensive “torture” and all themes lead to orgasms for the lucky or unlucky model. Fucking Machines comes to mind as you are likely never going to see women screaming no to more orgasms! You can also enjoy watching two or even four young ladies rolling around, wrestling, and doing it all clothed, partially clothed and fully nude on Ultimate Surrender. Have a hankering for public sex? Give Public Disgrace a try. Young ladies are taken out in the public where they are fucked and “forced” to deep throat as strangers watch, jeer and cheer them on. Want a walk on the wild side? Shoot for TS Seduction where transsexuals seduce and push their way into straight relationships. Sex and Submission is one of the most basic sites on the network, but it also is one of the largest.
The review is going to just be about the Kink sites as I believe the other licensed sites are just bonus add-on content and should be viewed as advertisement for other sites. The faux-torture sites include Wired Pussy where young women get their pussies electrocuted and shocked to their creamiest orgasms. Hogtied features the use of rope and binding (bondage). There is whipping and spanking over on Whipped Ass. Fancy a new twist to spanking? Check out Divine Bitches where women bend men over for a pegging and stroking. If you can’t get enough of the booty check out Everything Butt, a site dedicated to showing off, stretching and all-around anal acrobatics. Ever wanted your porn to be educational? Enroll at Kink University and sign up for a class in the Training of the O.
You really can’t go wrong with Kink Network as an overall value. The cons are small and are likely not cons for all people. I believe the gay and transsexual scenes could be useless to some people which does cut into the value of the network, but if you are joining Kink you maybe are open minded enough to at least not be against those genres being represented on the network. If it still a problem you can always click to just see the straight content which will remove the transsexual and gay sites from your view. The update rate is close to daily for the network, but many channels do not update any longer.
Neither of those cons should slow your interest in Kink. There are decades of content here that touches on BDSM, bondage and even torture. I do not know of a network anywhere that even comes close to Kink in terms of quantity plus quantity plus variety. I spend around $100 per year on it and it’s one of my most guaranteed and satisfactory purchases. |
|
12-11-22 08:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Adult Time
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An exhaustive tour def force of porn.
Over 60 sites or is it over 100 or 200?
Promo allows downloads.
High definition resolution video downloads.
Covers most genres and niches.
Can make a good argument for the only porn site you need a subscription to.
Seamless navigation and flawless tagging. |
| Cons: |
I would like to see Adult Time offering a package to include the original Gamma sites like Wicked Pictures
Joining for a short subscription is a con. You won’t have enough time to even see half the content unless you get a longer subscription. |
| Bottom Line: |
Adult Time offers the largest amount of adult content and at a higher quality than the majority of sites. A bold statement like “the only porn site you need a subscription to” is easily supported. You like a variety of niches? There are straight, anal, lesbian, group and blowjob sites. You like less mainstream genres? There is a filter to only show transsexual content and there are over 2,000 transsexual scenes. Need gay porn to round out your collection? They have it too.
The default subscription comes with no downloads, but it is easy to receive the downloads-included subscription. That is for $14.95 a month. I do not recommend a short membership (1-2 months). I once joined Adult Time and found out I missed more than half of the available content. I recommend a minimum of 3 months and 6 or 12 months is even better.
Reviewing Adult Time is like being a member of it. You are not going to be able to include everything. Which is why it feels wrong to say Adult Time should offer add-on subscriptions. Wicked Pictures is a favorite Gamma site. Why not offer it as a $5 per month add-on to Adult Time? Gamma also has many gay and transsexual sites that are not included with Adult Time. Why not offer a package to include some of those sites?
I am basing that off of people joining Adult Time on long subscriptions. It is the closest site on the internet to offering an experience that makes me say it’s the only porn site you need. For others, that may not be the case since they may want more transsexual or gay content. That’s why I would offer add-ons. Gamma is close to offering the only porn site you need and the add-ons would make it true for many.
Their video resolution on downloads goes from mobile 160p to 4K. The older videos won’t have a 4K option, but do have 720p and 1080p downloads. The sites that have pictures include the option to download those in a zip.
You are joining Adult Time to try and get a balance of high quality porn in a large quantity, but you probably shouldn’t. It has been talked about in-depth by many reviewers. The bulk of Adult Time’s material comes from older networks like 21 Sextury. You could avoid those old networks and still get your money worth from the lesser known sites like Pure Taboo, Girlsway and the various Hentai offerings they include.
While I don’t think I would crown Adult Time the only site you need to join, it is the only one I know of, that even gets a consideration in that claim. What impresses me most about Adult Time is they have grown their own content. Pure Taboo and its predecessor Pretty Dirty are examples of the high quality porn Gamma is capable of making. They could have easily rested on their laurels and let the older content and statistics be their calling card, but instead, they chose to add new porn that is better than most of the older scenes they acquired from 21 Sextury, and Fame Digital. All you have to do is watch one of the older scenes then one of the newer ones and you will see that Adult Time has learned from past mistakes and improved their porn exponentially. Easily a best value porn network. |
|
12-11-22 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Reality Kings
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The self-proclaimed kings of reality porn.
High model physical standards.
Thousands of videos and pictures.
Genres are separated by different site names.
Simplistic user-features for members.
Consistent updates and large back catalog. |
| Cons: |
Have to pay extra for downloads.
Annoying cancellation and customer support chat.
Mobile version of the site is stripped down and bare boned.
Most of their best sites (for me) are no longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
Other than those who reside under rocks or in a hobbit-hole, most everyone near porn has heard of the Reality Kings. The network offers a broad range of niches, but the genres are really limited, in contrast. Reality Kings is a straight-based network with Tranny Surprise being the only exception. There are lesbian scenes, threesomes, group and even party scenes, but you’re not going to see anything other than straight-aimed content.
Reality Kings, like Brazzers and even Naughty America have started to become stale to their regular fans, but maybe that’s not really the problem? My belief is the audience has changed. Reality Kings promoted their style of porn to straight males. Straight males are not known for our wants of a deeply emotional or mental sexual experience, therefore, the Reality Kings porn may seem stale and repetitive to the newer audience. Stories and plots are not the selling point. Nudity, dirty and raunchy acts are.
The need for downloads is an obvious one, but I am reviewing it solely as a streaming-only site. I do not think streaming-only is near as horrible as others do. Reality Kings prices are as low as $7 a month. Being able to watch any of their 10,000 videos for a month for $7 is a great deal to me.
If you like a variety of niches you will be generally happy with Reality Kings offering. They have one of the best MILF sites in Milf Hunter. One of the best lesbian sites in We Live Together. A fun and entertaining site in Money Talks. A great Latina site in 8th Street Latinas. In the VIP will help build your fantasies about what will happen the next time you visit a club.
It is not without its flaws even beyond the streaming-only status of the site. My favorite sites are no longer updating. If you visit the site on your cellphone or other mobile device, be prepared for a bare bones experience. Hopefully you will not need to contact their billing service customer support. They are rarely helpful and oftentimes time-consuming to chat with. You also may not get anything fixed. When you go to cancel if you do it through the chat you will be hounded with upsell offers and a circular conversation that leads you back to where you started.
The porn is worth joining for. A recurring or even long-term subscription is recommended unless you want to pay extra for downloads. The content is good for what they are aiming for. It’s mainstream porn that rarely goes outside the box, and I believe, that is what many people, especially straight males, prefer. |
|
12-11-22 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Naughty Mag
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Deep sleeper site that comes from the Score Group.
Their speciality is pictures in a magazine-style layout.
Videos are not as common, but newer ones are 4K.
Pictures are downloadable. Most have a 3000x2000 download resolution.
Models range from amateur to pro-amateur.
Almost 5,000 models |
| Cons: |
Bonus sites are not even worth looking at. All three sites included as bonus sites stopped updating in 2014 or earlier and the three combined do not offer large collections.
Videos could stand more production and direction. The videos seem more like a bonus to the photo sets.
Picture sets outnumber videos 4 to 1. |
| Bottom Line: |
As a breast-aficionado, the Score Group, has been a longtime destination for my porn money to go to. Naughty Mag does not follow the Score Group’s love of only large-breasted models. I am sure the models being amateur to pro-amateur plays a part in the decision not to focus just on large breasts, but I didn’t even notice. Naughty Mag is the perfect name for this site. Every memory you have of opening a porn magazine as a teenager will flood back into your mind when you look at all these sexy models. Most if not all breasts are all-natural, but some are very small up to medium-large.
The site includes 3 bonus sites. Those are Bored At Home, Porn Loser and Naughty Tugs. They should not even mention these as bonus sites. Two have not been updated in over a decade. The collections are not very large and these scenes and photo s would be just as well-served as Naughty Mag releases. The other issue is with the amount of videos and if the videos are even worth downloading. I will say yes, but the videos are not the focus and should be viewed that way. Any other expectations will bring a letdown.
You should join it with the knowledge and understanding of you’re here for the pictures. The pictures are not only high quality, but feature some of the best lighting you will find in porn pictures. The models, while mostly amateur, are excellent at posing and the photographer gets the best angles. I would even suggest the pictures on Naughty Mag are close to the same league as the Met-Art sites.
There is hardcore content and that may surprise some. The site is promoted more as softcore, and it is, but there’s some hardcore and it at least confirms the videos go beyond posing or teasing. Even so, you’re still better off looking at the pictures.
For me,the make or break point for this site, s centered around your attraction to the models. I find their models to be the prettiest collection of amateur models, and that greatly benefits the site. If anyone knows of a prettier collection of amateur models, I would like to know what site so I can join it. There may be some nostalgic bias based on me loving old pin-up and “girly magazines” but I am sure no one would be disappointed with this content as long as they understand the difference between quantity of photos to videos.
It is one of my favorite sites and is the only amateur site (not on a network) that I join. |
|
12-11-22 08:18pm
Replies (0)
|
|
