Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
A Lucky Stranger
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ "stranger" storyline
+ really average-looking guys
+ quite long pre-action video, adding some additional twist
+ lots of bonus sites (FilthFreaks network) |
| Cons: |
-- I don't really believe in "as a member of ALuckyStranger.com you could win a chance to have blindfolded sex with anonymous strangers aka pornstars!"
- girls attractiveness varies
- poor lighting
- only 640x480 clips of rather poor quality
- pictures are 640x480, probably video screencaps
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing
- cross-sales within member area
- minor technical problems with the site |
| Bottom Line: |
As a member of FilthFreaks network, after reviewing BlackGangWhiteBang.com I've moved to the next site of the same network, ALuckyStranger.com.
The site leaves mixed feelings. On one hand, the idea is not bad (though I don't really believe any site which claims that it's members will have a chance to fuck models). On the other hand, it is rather poorly implemented.
Quality of videos is limited to rather poor 640x480 @800kBit/s (looks that guys didn't know what deinterlacing is about); lighting is poor, girls are not top-notch (though are not that ugly as on BlackGandWhiteBang), actions are not too different from each other.
Site has about 35 episodes, each consisting of 4-5 clips of up to 10 minutes each. Pictures are about 1024x768, but quality is poor (like that of screencaps). Like on BlackGandWhiteBang, updates are not dated and most likely are infrequent. Also I've experienced the same several minor technical problems (like "Cannot find server" errors), as on BlackGandWhiteBang.
Overall, while judging from just two sites can be too early, it seems to me that this whole FilthFreaks network is just an attempt to resell some old content. While I don't see anything bad with this idea as such, but for FilthFreaks content quality (from model selection to encoding), which wasn't top-notch (to put it mildly) even when it was produced, looks even worse these days.
Bottom line: if all the sites in the network will be of such dubious quality, I don't think it will be attractive even at the special PU price; there are many places where you can get MUCH better content at at least comparable prices. Still, stay tuned for further reviews of FilthFreak sites. |
|
04-08-09 03:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Black Gang White Bang
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ hardcore action (multiple penetrations including double anal), as advertised
+ interracial content in every episode, as advertised
+ the girl usually undresses before action starts, adding some additional twist
+ lots of bonus sites (FilthFreaks network) |
| Cons: |
-- about the same thing in every episode
-- too often girls are ugly
-- girls don't like it
- no attention to settings
- poor lighting
-- only 400x300 clips
- pictures are 640x480, probably video screencaps
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing
- cross-sales within member area
- technical problems with the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Coming back from oblivion :-), I've recently subscribed to a new (for me) Filth Freak network. Unfortunately, so far it disappoints me.
At the first glance, BlackGangWhiteBang has everything it advertises - white girls taking four big guys in every hole, sometimes with double anal. So far so good. But then a few things start to annoy. First of all, videos with 400x300 resolution? I've double-checked my calendar, and found that it's 2009 out there, so these 400x300 clips look a bit out of date. Sorry guys, it's not what most people expect, even if it is crystal clear 400x300 at 1500kBit/s. I'm not asking for 1080i or something, but these days everything below 768 or so is way too small.
Further, some of the girls are outright ugly, and out of the rest most don't even pretend they're enjoying it. I know, it's difficult to find girls who enjoy this kind of stuff, but it's a job of any good site to find such girls, and I've seen sites with girls who seem to enjoy it.
From minor annoyances I shall mention poor (or non-existent?) lighting and quite poor settings, on the plus side - a bit of striptease before the action starts.
Site has about 25 episodes, each consisting of 5-8 clips 5 minutes each. Pictures are 640x480, most likely screencaps. Updates are not dated and most likely are infrequent. I've experienced several minor technical problems, like some "Cannot find server" errors and some links leading nowhere, nothing too bad but still annoying.
Bottom line: I don't think that this site will be of interest to anybody except for fans of interracial gangbangs, and even for them the value is significantly reduced by poor video quality and ugly girls disliking what they are doing. While the rest of the network MIGHT have some value, but if all the sites are like this one, the whole network won't IMHO be worth even PU special price. |
|
04-04-09 07:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
Play Sex Game
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ real 3D sex (camera/angles)
++ different sex positions
++ includes solo, boy-girl and even MMF
++ lots of different outfits for the girl
+ skin tones and hair
+ CCBill as processor |
| Cons: |
--- VERY limited action
--- action is too mechanical (just moving back and forth)
-- only one girl
- quality of 3D graphics is not so good compared to others (it's decent but not REALLY good)
- minor flaws in 3D interface (it may leave camera in position when it's difficult to see anything or move it) |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all, a word of warning: this site (play-sex-game.com) has TWO different games and TWO different subscriptions. One is for Flash-game "Sambuka" (I didn't subscribe and cannot comment on it), and another is "Alice 3D", which this review is about.
After VERY poor experience with 3DPlaything (see my review) I didn't give up and continued to look for decent 3D sex games). And while "Alice 3D" by Play-sex-game is similar to 3DPlaything in it's idea, it definitely gives MUCH more than 3DPlaything.
Idea is very simple and as I've said, close to 3DPlaything - you can dress that "Alice 3D" girl the way you want and then put her into different sex positions, sometimes alone, sometimes with a guy or even two. Then you can control movements (actually controlling only the speed of movement, as movements themselves are pre-programmed for each position). And as usual with real 3D, you can control camera angle and zoom easily. Quality of 3D graphics is IMHO not so good compared to 3DPlaything, but it's still not bad.
Bottom line: while it wasn't too entertaining for me (IMHO action was way too mechanical), it can have some value for real fans of 3D virtual sex. |
|
09-26-08 12:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Plug 2 Holes
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ DP site
+ group action
+ some girls aren't bad for this kind of action
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- most likely not updated (TBP lists 16+ episodes back in January, now it's 20)
- not much content
- booooring; always two guys and a girl
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site belongs to the same network that GangLandVictims I've reviewed a bit earlier, and quite expectedly it shares lots of common things with it. Video and pic quality, lack of updates, annoying login and pretty good navigation are all the same. There is one difference though and it's definitely not in favor of Plug2Holes: it is lack of creativity here. It is ALWAYS 2 guys on 1 girl, so in the very first clip they try everything they can, and all the other clips become BOOOOORING (there is one clip with DAP that adds some twist, but that's about it).
There are about 20 episodes on site, each is about 30 min video. As with GangLandVictims, main attraction is video (pics are vidcaps of quite low quality/resolution). As with GangLandVictims, all episodes are within theme (every episode has DP, and there is at least one DAP; no DPP was sighted). And also as with GangLandVictims, cameraguy work and lighting are very average, and so is quality of compression; in short - very average site from video quality standpoint.
Bottom line: IMHO not worth the money on it's own; considering the rest of Jerk-Off Pass network, can be not too bad as there are some better sites there. |
|
12-18-07 02:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
Nude in Public
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ original idea
+ real girls in nude on real streets
+ creativity (different scenarios and setups)
+ frequent updates
+ quite funny stories behind the shootings
+ rather active community |
| Cons: |
- videos are essentially teasers to get you buy full DVDs
- "Latest video update" is a video shot back in 2003
- no full scene videos at all
- almost no translation in videos
- video quality is very questionable (at 600kBit/s it looks like VHS; how do they sell DVDs with such quality?)
- thumbnails are so small that are almost useless
- picture quality is not so good (resolution is up to 1600x1200, but photographer's work is not up to resolution).
- design is a joke |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of the site (real nude girls in real city streets and other real public places), but the site has VERY serious deficiencies. The most annoying thing for me was the fact that they're selling the same content twice (charging for it twice). When subscribing to the site, they say "220 Video Clips", but once you're inside you find that videos are just "Free bonus", and essentially are just teasers to get you buy full versions at their DVD shop (xxvideo.com, where videos are sold at $35/90-minute DVD + S&H). Yes, there can be about 220 clips inside, but each clip is mere 2 minutes long, they date back to 2003-2004 and are NOT full videos (DVD versions of the same thing are substantially longer), plus quality is questionable by modern standards to say the least (both resolution and cameraguy work are subpar).
As for pictures - the main annoyance is their ultra-small thumbnails, which makes seeing what's going on almost impossible. Also IMHO this kind of content is much less interesting in pictures than in video.
Bottom line:
Adding FULL videos and sorting out thumbnails could make it an excellent site (especially with such creative guys behind), but at current state I don't see much value in it except for the big fans of this very niche (and even for them buying the same but FULL content from xxvideo.com at $35/DVD could be a better choice). |
|
11-20-07 08:44am
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
Sicko Games
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- unique idea of "real reality" site: models are playing games of stunts for real;
- game idea modeled after shows like Fear Factor;
- it does look as they play for real; |
| Cons: |
- when I was a member, there were exactly 5 (five) episodes, and no updates for more than a year; it doesn't seem they made any improvements since.
- way too sick for my taste;
- models are obviously playing for money only, and game atmosphere doesn't feel good;
- models are ugly (well, it's difficult to find pretty models willing to do that sick things);
- while there is sex included in each game played, but it is not related to the game and is booooooring;
- shooting quality is poor |
| Bottom Line: |
There is some story behind SickoGames. As it was reported (for example, look in Google for article "FearFactorFuck Morphs Into SickoGames After Legal Threats"), originally SickoGames had domain name FearFactorFuck.com, but they got cease and desist letter from Fear Factor lawyers and as a result indeed renamed site to SickoGames. It looks that at that point site owners actually lost all the interest in site, and stopped making new episodes. Also there were reports of them having problems finding new models (which is not surprising given the things expected from the models).
Site consists of several (there were 5 at the moment) games; each game is played by 3 girls and consists of tasks (there are also 3 guys present, but they don't compete). Each task (which is not too sick) winner gets 2 points, 2nd place - 1 point, and loser not only gets nothing, but should perform a special "wheel of shame" stunt (and that's where things start to go _really_ sick).
There are also 3 sex episodes in each game, but they are not related to the game in any way and just plain boring (not to mention poor cameraguy/lighting quality).
Bottom line: if they would make new games, I'd say that it's a site for lovers of really sick sites with motives of forcing girls doing really sick things (I'm not such a lover, but I'm not judging anybody who is :-) ). But without updates, I don't see much value in it even for such lovers (maybe to pay $25 for 5 episodes once and unsubscribe right after?) |
|
10-18-07 02:36am
Replies (5)
|
Review
57
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- original concept; pretends to be "real reality" (with no script) but frankly I'm not 100% convinced
- variety of games
- quality is ok
- cameraguy work is quite good |
| Cons: |
- I'm not 100% convinced that it is not scripted;
- undressing only
- photos only
- site design is pretty poor |
| Bottom Line: |
These guys seem to promote the idea of softcore specifically distancing themselves from hardcore; they're part of a bigger initiative to promote softcore (but "NO PORN") described on KeepItNice.com.
Overall, the site produces very mixed feelings; while the concept is very good, you need to be a really big fan of girls undressing and playing games while half-dressed or in nude to overcome 'undressing only' and 'stills only' issues. On the other hand, if they would add videos, personally I could try to join them back. |
|
10-17-07 03:06am
Replies (4)
|
Review
58
|
Digamour
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ quite realistic 3D sex
++ movements are natural
+ 4 types of girls ("Brazilian", "Japanese", "South African" and "German")
+ each can have different haircuts, complexity, and skin tone
+ one round of arcade play is quite interesting compared to the other similar games |
| Cons: |
--- booooring gameplay
-- clother to "arcade" game, not really RPG as advertised
-- no clothes
-- when starting the game, have only 4 different actions
- no toys
-- active subscription is required to play
-- no "extras", except for "bulk" membership with 2 other SOMA sites (3DPlaything and SexStation7). |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is another site built around "virtual 3D sex" game. And while the graphics (IMHO) isn't bad, gameplay is unbelievably booooring.
First of all, it is NOT MMORPG, as it erroneously stated in some places on the Internet (not a fault of the site itself), it's a single-player game, period. And IMHO it's not really an RPG at all, but more of arcade game.
The plot is almost non-existent (you need to fuck as much as possible with cyber-girls) but that's not a problem. And the first rounds don't pose a real problem too - it's some fun to understand how it works, and to see pretty realistic 4 positions. But the problems start a bit later. To get experience to get to level 2 (to get another 4 positions), you need to fuck 50 times, and each time it's 5 mini-fucks, each of mini-fucks representing one of original 4 positions. Ok, there are a bit different settings, and somewhat different partners, but to fuck 50*5=250 times with THE SAME 4 positions (making it 62 fucks per position) is unbeleivably boooooring for me. And when I was promoted to level 2 and got 4 new positions, totaling to 8, I've found that to go further it's necessary to fuck 100 times to get to level 3 and another 4 positions. This was too much for me and I gave up.
Bottom line: 3D engine isn't bad, and movements are natural, the game works ok without crashes, and arcade actions are much better compared to simple "press it harder to win" style of arcade, but complete lack of balance between time spent and benefit for it make it very difficult to recommend this site or this game. But should the guys listen and shorten the number of fucks required per level 5 times or so, it could become quite an enjoyable game. |
|
09-23-08 04:10pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
59
|
Russian Teens Club
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ several video formats (WMV/Flash/iPod).
+ some videos are HD (up to 1280x720 @4MBit/s)
+ access to the network (though if it's all of the same quality, I'm not sure it's a real '+'). |
| Cons: |
--- most likely, at least some videos are not Russian even if advertised as such
-- pre-checked cross-sales
-- not sure if there is at least some genuinely Russian videos
-- according to TBP, only "some" content is exclusive, and it's unclear what part of it is indeed exclusive.
-- at least some girls are of quality which make you think "do I really want to see them in HD?"
- cameraguy work and lighting is VERY
inconsistent (probably due to non-exclusivity)
- site navigation is a mess. |
| Bottom Line: |
RussianTeensClub site was a rather big disappointment to me for a simple reason: it didn't deliver what it promised. When I see site names "Russian Teens Club", I expect to see Russian Teens, not Czech teens, Hungarian teens or Holland teens, but RUSSIAN teens. And when on the very first page of their "Hi-Def Russians" I see the name "Petra Pearl", which is apparently a Hungarian model (see for example here: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/petrapearl.html ), it raises HUGE question about credibility of the whole thing. After this, I've started to look for some conversation within the movies (while I don't know Russian, I can tell a few other languages which are obviously NOT Russian), and surprisingly wasn't able to find ANY dialog or ANY words whatsoever. While normally such videos don't have much words, still occasional "fuck" or something frequently gets in, but in these videos I was NOT able to find ANY such line; were they chosen in this way deliberately (to make sure that customers won't be able to figure out if it's Russian or not) - I don't know.
Technical details about the site aren't bad: WMV in two resolutions (one is 1280x720 @4MBit/s), iPod format, FLash (in decent quality) to view it online. But overall quality of the videos varies from one to another one greatly - it looks that they were shot by completely different teams, and vary from "Very Good" to "Very Poor". The same is true for the girls, and at least SOME of them are of the quality which makes you think "Do I REALLY want to see all that pussies-shaven-a-week-ago and pimples in HD?", though SOME girls are beautiful.
Bottom line: in my book, advertising one thing and selling another one qualifies as SWINDLING, so I can't give the site anywhere high rating. Add to this pre-checked cross-sales (which deducts another 5 points from rating), and you've got the idea why it was rated as low as 60. Moreover, I don't really see anybody who this site can be REALLY attractive for (not for those looking for genuine Russian stuff for sure). |
|
06-15-09 02:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique content
+ real nude girls in real streets
+ FULL videos (unlike NudeInPublic)
+ girls are "girl next door" type, but not ugly
+ frequent (but disgustingly small) updates
+ picture quality is decent
+ girl date of birth and shooting place for each shoot are shown |
| Cons: |
- not so good attempt to mimick NudeInPublic
- repetitive (especially compared to NudeInPublic
)
- video quality is mediocre
- micro-updates of 20 pictures a time are disgustingly small
- bigger files hosted by 3rd-party (with separate login/password)
- not that much content |
| Bottom Line: |
After my recent (and not so successful) attempt to join NudeInPublic (.com) - see my review, I've decided to try NudeInPublic.tv . Unfortunately, it turned out to be even bigger disappointment.
It looks that it is an independent attempt to do something similar to NudeInPublic, but unfortunately it has lots of definiencies. The main one is that they lack creativity of NudeInPublic. There are no scenarios and different situations here, just nude girl going through the streets. Everything else isn't that bad,
and (unlike NudeInPublic) these guys don't try to sell the same thing twice, so videos are FULL), but unless some creativity is thrown in, the site doesn't offer much of useful content.
So much for my attempt to find site of this very niche :-(
Bottom line:
comparing them to NudeInPublic isn't that straightforward: these guys do have FULL videos (BIG PLUS), but with much less creativity (BIG MINUS). Overall, if you're a big fun of nude girls walking through crowded streets, I'd still recommend NudeInPublic over NudeInPublic.tv (but read my review of them CAREFULLY - it's not a picnic there too, and I gave them only 68 rating); if you're not a big fan of these things - don't bother. |
|
11-22-07 03:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Sex Vids On Pod
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ iPod support (480x360x800kBit/s)
+ many tons of content
+ frequent updates
+ multi-language site |
| Cons: |
- while category searches are present in public area, they're are absent in member area
- non-iPod videos are a waste of bandwidth
- content is merely a collection of 15-30 min clips; no stories behind
- content is not unique/exclusive
- 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network) content
- no chapters in iPod videos
- site navigation
- upsells |
| Bottom Line: |
When looking at home page of SexVidsOnPod, it doesn't look too bad - it looks as a collection of clips formatted for iPod. It is pretty obvious that it will be 'YAWN' (Yet Another Wanking Network), but sometimes you don't need more than that.
When going inside, things go worse though. The biggest disappointment I had with the site is that while category search is available on home page, it is not available in member area, so all you get is just a plain list of clips (even without ability to jump somewhere).
iPod encoding isn't bad, with 480x360x800kBit/s it should look not bad not only on iPod (which I've tested), but also on bigger devices (like AppleTV, which I don't have). Unfortunately, iPod videos don't have 'chapters' in them, which makes viewing on iPod less enjoyable even for these rather small clips. They claim they also support iPhone, which is most likely the case, but with iPhone having screen of 480x320, it isn't clear to me whether 480x360 will look really good there.
On the other hand, non-iPod encoded videos are a joke. 3Mbit/s with a picture of 640x480 (which is definitely very far from being crisp) is definitely a waste of bandwidth.
Bottom line: could be worth it only if you want iPod videos, have no interest in watching them on PC and don't really worry about content. As I hardly can imagine such a person (especially as there are more and more sites providing iPod as an option), hence a low rating. |
|
10-31-07 05:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
Swingers At Play
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique concept
+ real swingers
+ girls next door for those who like it
+ game ideas are fun
+ one-time payment option |
| Cons: |
- not convinced that they play for real
- clips are in Russian with no subtitles
- not clear whether site is updated
- no ZIP download
- lighting and cameraguy work is amateurish
- sound track disappears from time to time |
| Bottom Line: |
I would like to say that their tour page doesn't really make them justice, but unfortunately it does - inside it's as dull as outside. It feels as a kind of abandoned site - it is not clear when there was last update, and whether there will be the next one. Still, at the price (by the way, there is a one-time subscribing option) you'll get 15 games, each with 15-20 minutes of unique content, and if it would be really good content, it still could be rather good deal, but here is where real problems start.
Idea is good and games could be fun, but overall feeling is not good: in part because of poor editing and breaks all the time, in part because it is spoiled for those who can't understand the language (supposedly Russian), in part because players sometimes aren't able to follow their own rules (at least as they're described on site), and go down to outright orgy pretty soon.
Quality of videos is formally decent (640x480x1100kBit/s), but is definitely spoiled by lack of proper lighting, cameraguy work and post-editing (which doesn't seem to be present at all); overall, looks very amateurish.
Bottom line: could be worth trying if you can understand Russian; otherwise even for as hardcore fun of sex games as I am, it is not worth the trouble or money. |
|
10-30-07 05:05am
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Orgyental
(0)
54.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ interracial orgy as advertised
+ black guys with big dicks on latina girls as advertised
+ plenty of action, including anal
+ decent quality pictures
+ lots of bonus sites (FilthFreaks network) |
| Cons: |
----- most episodes are incomplete (see explanation below)
-- only 400x300 video clips
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing
- cross-sales within member area
-- supposedly no updates |
| Bottom Line: |
After pretty good experience with FilthFreak's BubbleButtOrgy, I've decided to try another their site Orgyental, and was fased with a MAJOR disappointment. While all parameters of Orgyental are about the same as BubbleButtOrgy, and it should have ended up with a similar rating, there is one HUGE thing which is different between these 2 sites, and it is that Orgyental just doesn't work properly.
Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental is about multi-guy multi-girl orgy, the difference is that for Orgyental girls are latina (and the guys are still black). Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental has some introductory stuff which makes things more interesting. Like BubbleButtOrgy, Orgyental starts mildly and then goes to all-out orgy.
But here is where the difference kicks in. While Orgyental has 24 episodes, and it looks that every episode was intended to consist of 15-20 5-minute clips, on site there are only 2 (or so) full episodes, and the rest just abruptly ends after 5-7 clips, leaving the best part out. Most likely it is just a technical oversight, but as a user I don't really care.
Bottom line: if it would be a single site, I would say it is outright rip-off, but as it is a part of the network, I won't be that harsh. On the other hand, such sites make me frustrated, which definitely affects overall feeling about the whole network (which BTW wasn't that high from the very beginning). |
|
04-10-09 09:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
64
|
3D Plaything
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
++ decent 3D virtual setup
+ 4 different action spots (but in the same room)
+ variety of dildos
+ skin/hair/breasts modifications for the girl |
| Cons: |
--- not much to do
--- the only action allowed (in addition to asking girl to take some position) is moving dildos (mouth, pussy or anal)
- single girl only (with toys)
-- it's THE SAME girl despite modifications (face is always the same :-( ).
- the only clothing is bikini
- removing bikini is one-step without animation
- need to keep subscription to play (not that I think somebody will need it) |
| Bottom Line: |
When I've played Digamour (see my review) by the same SomaVision company, one of my thoughts was "oh, it cannot possibly become any more boring", but my recent experience with 3DPlaything by the same company has proven I was wrong :-(.
The beginning of the game is fine - you can "build" your girl, selecting skin tone/breast size/hair and so on, so there are quite many variations you can build. But on the next step comes the disappointment: all you've got is a girl which you can ask to take different positions (and position change is NOT even animated), ask her to remove bikini (NOT animated too), and move dildo in and out of any of her three orifices (this IS animated). And that is all the "game" you get for 19.95/month! Ok, as usual in 3D, you can move your "camera" to look from different angle, and you can also move to one of 4 different spots in the same room, but the action is always the same - girl in some position and all you can do is to move dildo in and out of her, that's it.
Bottom line: while I can't say it's completely useless and rate it at 50, I honestly see that only VERY few people would want to pay this kind of money for this kind of entertainment. |
|
09-24-08 07:30am
Replies (0)
|
|
