Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good, high resolution videos 960x540
- Consistent daily updates, plus huge archive of over 500 videos
- Pics are also high resolution and available in zip files
- Over 700 models
- Webmaster will answer emails, including questions about future models and even takes and listens to recommendations
- Great TBP price of $19.95
Cons:
- Some of the content isn't exclusive
- Some say the newer scenes aren't as good or believable
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Sapphic Erotica a total of 12 times since 2004. Also note on my high score that I consider this by far and away the best lesbian site on the internet. There is very little to complain about. They have the high res pics and videos, zip files for pics, fast downloads, great customer service, under $20 price with TBP discount and though some may question the realistic/believability of some of the newer scenes, you still won't find any lesbian/glammed up models lesbian sites that has as much believable material when counting the archives.
I guess some even complain because the models are mostly European. I never quite understood that complaint, unless it is because there isn't much talking. I have very little doubt that if Sophie Moon started out in the industry in American Lesbian DVDs, that anyone would have known she isn't American. She looks like a native Californian to me.
The action on here is as real as I believe you will find on a non-amateur site. The one that stands out to me is Sarah Blake, she has a scene in front of a fireplace that has some tribbing in it that no one could ever convince me isn't real.
If you are into tribbing, {rubbing clits together) this site has more of it than any site I have found. There is also plenty of kissing, 69s and toys/fingers. To me, when basing a score on quality/quanity/value/ there are very few sites in any niche as good. It goes without saying that I rank it highly and highly recommend it!
Follow-Up:
New search feature makes Sapphic even easier to use than before! +2 on score
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Incredible amount of material, soft, hard and even machines
- Nice variety with a brutally hardcore section, blowjob/facial section, solo section and lesbian section
- Most of the best Euro models are here for collectors, Eve Angel, Sophie Moone (over 40 sets of the gorgeous blonde alone), Angel Dark, Sandra Shine, DDF has them all
- Denys is an excellent photographer and the pictures show it. He brings the best out in the models.
Cons:
- Older videos are average quality at the very best
- Older videos also are only downloadable in smaller clips which can make downloading frustrating if you have a fast internet connection since the clips are only 12 megs each on average and each set can have up to 10 clips
- I wish the pictures were bigger.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on 1byday on three different occasions over the years. I really like the site, especially the different variety of genres. My only real problem with the overall site is the quality on some videos that are older and the smaller picture sizes. The biggest pictures are in the 1.6 range. I like seeing the big Euro stars named above and throw in Anetta Keys, most of their sets on 1by-Day are earlier in their careers which can be hard to find. The Machines section is a nice addition, but it doesn't stand on its own like the original Machines site does. Which it doesn't need to with the other sections of videos added in.
My favorite part is that pretty much every picture set also has a video set as well. So you don't find yourself seeing a picture set and thinking, "I wish there was a video of this set" because there usually is on 1by-day. None of the complaints are that major. There could be a deeper search engine, instead, you browse the hundreds, maybe thousands of women alphabetically or by using a drop down menu. I would like to see all of these sites that has this much material to use a search engine that allows filters for hair color, ethnicity, and so on. Especially seeing that a lot of the women don't use the same name on different sites.
Overall, I would recommend it, the newer videos are HD quality and with the hardcore, machines, solo, lesbian sections it is unlikely that you will find much to complain about.
Follow-Up:
Improvement in quality and two HD updates per day has pushed 1byday up into a class by itself!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite site of mine. It had been several years since I joined it.
- Site seems a little outdated but it’s not bad and it works.
- Fresh amateur “exotic” models and a few pros thrown in for good measure.
- Good download speeds (80% my max)
- CCBill is the payment processor.
- Multiple daily updates.
- Could surprise others like it did me.
Cons:
- I am going to go into the use of the word, “exotic” in the bottom line. ATK believes pale women with afro-looking pubic hair are exotic. I have talked in-depth about my dislike of big, bushy pubic hair. This is a big con for me.
- Site not only looks outdated, it acts and performs slow too. Videos crash, photos don’t always load.
Bottom Line:
I have been writing reviews about this site for 16 years. To my surprise, I was expecting the new models to be boring but they’re anything but boring. I ended up letting my membership recur for an extra month.
The word Exotics: My use of it in my name was based on what me and my friends considered exotic women. Medium complexion, green eyes, black hair, pretty lips and lots of curves. Those women I knew as exotics were Asian, Latina, biracial and Indian. I still feel pretty confident about that definition.
But ATX Exotics sees exotics as meaning anything different from the norm. That means women with 6.7 pounds of body hair are tagged as exotics. That’s just blasphemy to me. I see the big bush as tagged as “hairy” not exotic. That is a longtime complaint I have had with ATX Exotics. They have everything else going the way I see it but have to throw those women needing a bushwhacker for their body as exotic.
To put an image on “exotic”, see young Carmen Electra, maybe Shakira and in porn, Priya Rae. Want to see my depth and knowledge of exotic women? Check out Anjali Kari for a knockout British-Indian model.
There are good parts about the site not changing much and there are bad parts. Some of the problems I remember the site having 10 years ago are still there. That is a minor complaint and it really doesn’t make much difference in usability. The search engine still has flaws it had in 2015. I had been away from ATK Exotics for so long, I just decided to start at the newest update and go backwards. It was refreshing compared to most pro sites. I saw young, sexy women having fun and smiling for their pictures. I wonder if anyone ever described the starry-eyed look the amateur models have? You see that on ATX Exotics.
You’re not joining this site for hardcore or even fetishes. I don’t consider exotic women to be a fetish. You’re on this site to look at high quality photosets and watch softcore videos. They have those needs and wants covered.
I do wonder and have wondered if our minds have been altered by all the samey-porn. You just start to expect mediocre. I do believe that is why ATK Exotics feels fresh to me. Nothing I see as wrong with pro porn won’t be found on ATK sites.
This membership reminded of the days of joining ATK sites to look for photosets to download and collect. Videos were secondary back then and still are for me if the photos are good enough. That’s not to say everything is perfect. There are those hairy models to deal with and some of the models are just not attractive to me.
The ones that are attractive far outweigh the not attractive and nearly all the newer models I’ve seen during this membership are really pretty or cute.
You still get to use CCBill to join and cancel. There’s focus on photo zips that is at least equal to the movie importance. And there are no download limits. It’s porn as we remember it. It’s just the main audience wasn’t even old enough to buy porn back then.
It's easily a top 10 site for me, based on my tastes and preferences.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Look what slipped in. One of the only sites I ever felt like saying the word “unique” really applied to.
- It’s not like any site I have been on. There’s a Heaven side and there’s a Hell side.
- Created by the same people that created the great Alt Erotic.
- Seeing how many of the models can pull off Heaven and Hell.
- They have a special right now for Easter. I’m not going to say that’s ironic.
- Download speeds are good, about 80% of my max.
- This is a really important one. This site could be a lot more confusing than it is. They have it set up in a way that it works properly. You still may get confused.
Cons:
- They tried something different. All the angry porn fans screaming stop trying to evolve porn!
- It could be confusing to people.
Bottom Line:
What have I found here? I’m going to try and simplify it. The site itself is purgatory. No sermons coming from me. When you search in the episodes or trilogies, you can select Heaven or Hell. The Heaven scenes are more innocent. Newest one is a cute hair beautician seducing the man getting his haircut. Which is creative. Alt Erotic was doing something like this with their site and tattoo artists seducing the people being tattooed. The Heaven side also goes into what I would call standard porn or normal porn. Clary Trinity, one of my current favorites, has a scene on the Heaven side. It’s her and I think Jay Romero having sex in the house. If you start with that scene it doesn’t seem like much is going on but it’s part 2 of a trilogy. Part 1 was Jay having sex with Chloe Temple, his “supposed” lover. He told her about his fantasies. Clary Trinity is his fantasy. In episode 1, this story was all set up and sex happened. In episode 2, Jay lives out his fantasy with Clara. Episode 3 hasn’t been released yet and there’s the hook and what this site is doing right. All I can see is a blurred image for episode 3. I can’t tell if that’s Clary or Chloe or some other woman. That’s just the Heaven side.
Let’s try the Hell side now. Donnie Rock tired and drunk. His girlfriend is Jazlyn Ray, quite attractive. Donnie is drunk and his buddy Mazee the Goat is with them. Mazee makes the moves on Jazlyn since Donnie is passed out drunk. But there’s the Hell. Donnie likes watching. He starts watching in this trilogy called, “One Eye Open”. Jazlyn then has another run with Mazee and invites her friend Kay Lovely for a threesome. Somehow, Donnie got on the couch and fell asleep and Jazlyn notices he’s peeping. I think part 3 of it is a foursome.
They’re doing something different. I will give them that. I really like what they’re doing and would put on par or even above Pure Taboo. They are showing real fantasies people have and are letting those fantasies play out instead of relying on the text box to explain what’s going on. It’s takes decent acting ability to do these scenes. They don’t take themselves that seriously. Anytime you put Charles Dera in a scene, you’re not looking for serious. The site if nothing else shows me that porn can change. It can be creative. Some of these models, male and female, can act and they don’t have to be overtly silly or too serious.
The part no one should be surprised by is most of the female models are either Heaven or Hell. Only a few do both. Kenzie Reeves has 5 Hell scenes and 3 Heaven scenes. They have top talent too. The camerawork is as good as I’ve seen, and the settings fit the stories. I don’t think you’ll see most settings more than once. Not all of the scenes are part of a trilogy.
The technical facts about the site shows that it’s not even a budding site. It has some traction. It’s worth joining, the current special is $14.99 with downloads. There are 129 scenes currently when you combine the Heaven and Hell scenes. They do not have 4K, but all scenes do have 1080p and 720p. They also have nice photosets. Everything can be downloaded and its unlimited downloads.
I think the easiest way to approach this site is to not pay too much attention to the Heaven and Hell part. I just go through the new episodes and trilogies. They have been averaging 2 updates per month. The production values really set this site apart. It’s not a 100 site but it’s over 90. They have the stories, the continuity from one scene to another, the Heaven and Hell twist and top models. I like it a lot and look forward seeing where they take it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A premier old/young site that’s been around as long as I’ve been reviewing porn.
- The site is large (see cons) and currently is sitting on scene 799.
- Navigation is clear and straightforward but it could be improved (see cons)
- Newest 125 or so scenes have 4K download option (see bottom line for full quality details).
- Downloadable photo sets and screenshots.
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max.
- Pretty and young female models.
Cons:
- It drives my OCD crazy when there aren’t dates on the scenes. There are none here but based on the last TBP review, it looks like they’ve added nearly 20 scenes in 2021, maybe 2 updates per month?
- The site has everything it needs in navigation but the way the scenes are laid out can make it a little frustrating. I will explain further in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I actually remember this site from my very first year on Porn Users. I think it was one of the only old/young sites back then. It’s hard to believe but I was in my 20s when I started reviewing on Porn Users. I am now about to hit 42. Back then, I had no interest in watching a bunch of old guys have sex with 18-24 year old women. There is more to this niche than meets the eye. Do the Transformers owe me royalty for that? What you have here is the tale of Beauty and the Beast meets porn. Very attractive young women having sex with this old guys that look like they are probably someone’s grandfather. One of the things I’ve noticed that Oldje advertises is Real Swallows and Kisses. There’s the more than meets the eye. I don’t think a porn site is pulling off anything special to talk a young woman into having sex with an older man for a paycheck. But, these scenes have a lot of touching, kissing and shows of affection and lust. You can buy lust. It’s not as easy to buy affection. The one time I joined this site before this time, I was impressed by the chemistry between the young women and older men.
To my surprise and let me add happiness, Oldje doesn’t stray from older man/younger woman. I’m still not too open to the younger men/older women niche. At least not on this big of an age difference. I don’t think I would enjoy watching an 18 year old guy have sex with a 67 year old woman. I’m reviewing porn, doesn’t that tell you I can be shallow?
My complaint about the layout should be furthered a little. They have the newest scene showing when you sign in and below it is one that isn’t numbered and says, “special”. That’s what happens when you number your scenes. That’s 799, then “special” scene just below it. Below special scene is scene 798. It may be OCD at work. I don’t know why those special scenes are in-between the numbered scenes. I don’t know if those are numbered elsewhere on the site or if they are bonus scenes. You can download them. Clicking the model’s name doesn’t help. It opens the models scenes up but no numbers on those. You all are starting to realize why I’ve been married 3 times.
Don’t let that take away from what is a very entertaining site in this niche. They have Gina Gershon in a gangbang with older men. I think you have to put yourself in the older men’s mindset, I’m going straight to hell for this, you know those older guys are looking at each other and saying, “I finally have a story to tell my adult grandchildren.” It does make it entertaining. These are not “stunt cocks”, this is one of the greatest moments of these men’s lives. It’s a fun site. Even if I’m not that into the older/younger niche. I can appreciate it more now than 14 years ago.
They also have very good quality. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080, 720 and 540 in the download options. There are downloadable photo sets and downloadable screenshots. It’s becoming pretty common to just accept that if we at least get pictures we should be happy. These pictures are 2000 long end. I’ve said it before, that’s better than no pictures. On the videos, I find the 720p plenty clear and crisp enough to download those. I’m go back into their older scenes, back when some of these young women were starting kindergarten. If the older guys performances don’t impress you, this will, every scene, unless I missed one, has at least 720p download. I don’t think you can ask for more than that from a site that has been around this long.
I didn’t list this as a con since it’s becoming so common. The site is a free-scroll site. Scroll, let more scenes load, scroll, let more scenes load. I know a few members have talked about not liking that. I don’t either but it’s not that bad.
If you’re into older and younger porn you definitely should check this site out and it comes with a couple other sites. They also have an Oldje threesome site. The tags seem to work well on this site. There’s not a lot to complain about. Unless you’re just turned off by the niche itself. There are threesomes on here with the old guy taking care of two younger women. I think porn like this is a nice break from stunt cocks, the same nearly violent hardcore scenes that we’re seeing in mainstream porn today. Much more impressed than I would have been when I was 28.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some of the best and most beautiful Exotic models in the world.
- It’s updating but slowly (once a month)
- Above-average production qualities in the scenes.
- Downloadable videos and photo sets (see cons on photos)
- Download speeds are good at 80% my max
- 158 scenes
Cons:
- The pictures are screencaps and only have 30-50 per zip file.
- Too much advertising to try and get you to join their other sites (see next con)
- It’s a premium standalone site. Unless you are willing to pay extra, this is the only site you get for $18, I did do the upgrade and will review several of their sites to show what all you get with the upgrade.
Bottom Line:
Just put Exotics in the title and I think you’re calling my name. This site does a lot right but there are complaints. This site is still updating but a lot of their premium standalone sites aren’t updating anymore. It looks like they (believe it’s Porn Pros), should merge all these premium standalone sites into a package besides the “upgrade” nonsense. As it is, the upgrade gets you a nice collection of very high quality sites but as mentioned, not all of those sites are updating and it gets worse … there are two upgrade packages, meaning if you want every single standalone premium site Porn Pros you have to join one site at $18, then upgrade it for $65 to get all the standalone premium sites in one package, then upgrade it again for another $65 to get all their other standalone premium sites. If they combined all these sites into a premium network for even $50/month, it would be a steal. As it is, it’s going to depend on your taste and if they have enough content.
Exotics4K is one of my favorite sites they have. Probably my favorite, even. The models are top of the line with models like Vina Sky, Kimora Quin, Reyna Delacruz, I could just name the whole model list off. I am a little surprised to see Allie Addison on here, didn’t realize she’s an Exotic. Most of the models are Asian or Latina/Hispanic, maybe Allie (with those curls) is Latina? Don’t go making this an educational experience. I am going to jab them a little on that part. If they think this is an educational experience there will be an upgrade charge.
Enough picking on them, this site is really good if you like younger, Exotic women that are very pretty and most are good performers. You’re not going to find many sites with the video quality they have. The newest scene has these download options 4K mp4, 1080p mp4, 720p mp4, 720p WMV and 480p mp4. While the site is not huge, for this specific of a niche, it’s a good-sized collection and that’s where the quality really stands out. The oldest scene’s videos has these download options: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 720p WMV and even has two different bitrate versions of the 480p download option. There is no dropoff from the newest update to the first scene on the site. That’s where they are standing out in these days of varying quality and older scenes seeing a big dropoff in quality.
The pictures are frustrating. I like pictures as much as videos, sometimes, even more than videos. Considering how pretty these models are it’s all the more reason to want more pictures, higher quality pictures and a little more than just screencaps which I can take with my VLC player while watching the video. It’s just the feeling that there should be more for this premium of a site. They do give you the option to download a trailer (never have in all my years), and here comes the next questionable decision. Some of the oldest scenes look like they were going for higher quality pictures then scrapped the idea. With all this upgrade now, upgrade here, upgrade there, how about I get some money back for the scenes that don’t have the higher quality pictures?
It’s all made up for with the technical quality of the videos and attractiveness of the models. Dumb, repetitive stories? You bet your ass there are. Don’t care, hot exotic model on the screen. I don’t want to know what her favorite position is and don’t need a story to tell me WHY that male wants to have sex with her. I can see why. I think if you have the money (I don’t join a lot of different sites anymore) to join one of their sites and do the upgrades, there is a lot of very high quality, premium porn. As a standalone, I am still going to score the site high because I like the models so much. If you’re not really into exotic models you could fairly knock 10 points off my score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good value for fans of the earlier 2000s style of porn.
-- Includes Karups PC, Karups Hometown Amateurs and Karups Older Women all for one price. Those used to be $29.95 each.
- The combination of the three sites is massive and they update everyday.
- Can browse by all sites, by any of the three sites and can do this with videos, photos and model list. Complicated navigation but highly effective and intuitive once you get used to it.
- One of the few sites I see anymore that still uses CCBill as their biller.
- All videos over the last year have 4K option.
- The archives are still here. There are scenes here from 2001 including one that warmed my old heart of a very young Eve Angel and Sophie Moone.
- Major points for collectors of Euro and amateur models.
Cons:
- If they are remastering any of the old scenes I haven’t noticed. The oldest scenes are 360p.
- It’s overwhelming even for me. I know the majority of this content and was a member of Karups PC at least 10 times prior to 2012. I still find myself feeling like I’m drowning in content.
- The bottom line will go more into this, this is a traditional earlier 2000s studio and site even though they are still updating. It’s only a con if you’re not a fan of that era of porn. I am and enjoy the site because of it.
Bottom Line:
What’s an earlier 2000s porn site like? Karups PC was the big site for me. I didn’t get into the amateur models until 2013 or later. Karups like DDF’s old sites, like 21 Sextury’s old sites before they become a network featured almost exclusively solo, male/female and lesbian scenes. There’s no way I could go through the 17,000+ video scenes to see if there are threesomes or group sex but I haven’t seen any. It was a more focused era of porn where the action took a backseat, the storylines took a backseat and even the quality of performance took a backseat to the attractiveness of the female model. You could say it’s shallow in that regard. It never bothered me and still doesn’t. I’m paying money to look at naked and teasing women. I’m pretty sure that makes me a little shallow!
The numbers here are going to scare away newer potential members. There are over 17,000 videos, there are nearly 35,000 photo sets and close to 6,500 models. Separating the three sites does make it a little easier to deal with the staggering amount of content but when you separate the content you are running the risk of missing a model’s content who maybe started on Karups Hometown Amateurs then moved up to Karups PC. I believe they do a better job than most sites when it comes to sticking to their niches. The PC models are the pro models and you will recognize most of them by name. The Hometown Amateurs brings in the typical downside and upside of amateur sites. There will be some models you don’t find attractive, some that you will wonder why the model didn’t keep going or become better known and some will be models who did, in time, become more famous and known. The Older Women site mostly is older women by porn standards. I don’t want to be disrespectful but a lot of the models on their older women site have a (looking for the least offensive word possible) sluttier look to them. I think they would rather be called sluttier than older. There are some on the older women site who don’t look old enough to be on there but when did porn models start being honest about their ages?
A few things you have to accept with this combination of 3 sites is many of the PC models are going to lean more to the glamorous side. I still like glamorous models, just not as much as I used to. The Hometown Amateurs and Older Women models are going to possibly have traits known to annoy porn fans like tattoos and implants. I think if you picked 6,500 women off the street there would be a fairly high percentage that either has tattoos, implants or both. It adds to the authenticity but will be a negative to some.
Considering the size of this site, with the 3 sites combined on it, the navigation is good. It does require more clicks than I like but that’s one of my personal problems most members probably won’t even notice. You can search the entire site which includes results from all 3 sites or you can specify which site you want to focus on. They have well thought out buttons like when you go to Karups PC right at the top of the screen is “Hardcore videos”, “Softcore videos”, then 7 buttons like “Teens with toys photos” for the the different basic niches of photos.
This has been a gripe of mine for many years with Karups, personally, I don’t even look at their hardcore videos. It’s like when Nubiles started adding hardcore. It’s not what they excel at and the scenes are redundant. I won’t even say their solo videos are that great. The pictures are a major strength on this site and the videos are just like the icing. I believe that is even more true on Hometown Amateurs.
Something I don’t think you can look over if you’re a collector of specific models is how much exclusive content they have on this site. One of the examples of a now classic model Eve Angel, she has 5 videos and 23 photo sets. Using the word exclusive can be risky with this content since the models often wore the same outfits in their different photo and video shoots. Once you look at the photo sets you see it is different from a photo set you may have of the same model in the same outfit. You also get something I know myself and another longtime Porn User once talked about and that’s “new finds” in models. There’s one right now who is in the newer models on Karups named Luna Mills. I don’t know if she’s known or has content elsewhere but Karups just introduced me to this model I probably wouldn’t ever have known about. She looks possibly Hispanic, slightly thick and has high energy in her 2 videos and very good posing in her 2 photo sets.
You get that treasure hunt feel. You’re going through hundreds of models you have never seen before and there’s that one who jumps out at you. A lot of the older Porn Users will say one of the favorite parts of joining porn sites was the hunt for new models or exclusive content we hadn’t seen before of an old favorite. That’s what Karups does best.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It doesn't look like a network hub, but it is and it gives a better deal than the network it's on (see bottom line, this is going to get confusing).
- 3,444 videos on just Idols 69.
- Most of the best Japanese fetishes are at least represented here.
- Very good navigation from switching to site to site with one click and not having to sign in on each site to having around 60 categories and over 100 tags.
- Vendo is the biller and they've moved up to the CCBill and Epoch level of good billers.
- Idols 69 has some of Japan's prettiest models.
- Good download speeds (80% of max) and no download limits.
Cons:
- No subtitles.
- Video quality is limited to the DVD source they are taken from.
- Censoring, this is not a con for me, but will be for others.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start out with the pro that said it would be confusing to explain. Idols 69, years ago, was a standalone site. It was the site you joined to see Maria Ozawa as they have 20 videos of her. All Japanese Pass then launched a few years later and they used to have Idols 69 included with it. The TBP review still lists Idols 69 as coming with the All Japanese Pass. Since my membership was expiring with All-Japanese Pass, I decided to join Idols 69 (it includes all the sites All-Japanese Pass has too).
An easy way to see that Idols 69 is no longer included with All-Japanese Pass is to look at the total network scenes. All-Japanese Pass has 12,931 scenes. Idols 69 and its network has 16,619. If you subtract those you get 3,688 less scenes with the All-Japanese Pass. Idols 69 shows it having 3,444, so that's where the majority of the missing scenes are.
The rest of the included sites are the same as All-Japanese Pass. I'm just going to focus the rest of this review on the Idols 69 content.
The big con most will find is the video quality. It's a questionable con for me just because this content is mostly better than the newer content coming out of Japan. It's not unlike American porn. The older scenes (10 years ago), are more creative, sometimes they are just plain dumb and more importantly, you get the beautiful AV Idol models. I can deal with lesser resolution. It's like choosing between a $100,000 sports car with no engine and nowhere to put an engine and a $25,000 car that will drive for decades. My reviews have been missing analogies. I'm a bit rusty.
Idols 69 covers all the bases with solo, male/female, group and of course, wacky, like the producer that got the bright idea to give a model an ice cream to masturbate with. It was hard to start. The originally draw for me to Idols 69 was Maria Ozawa, but it also has a lot of masturbation scenes. Masturbation and lesbian scenes are not as common in Japanese porn as American porn. My favorite "action" in porn is a female masturbating. That's where the censor/mosaic is a bonus.
Nearly all masturbation scenes start with a model in clothes, skirt, panties and they stay that way for more than 34 seconds like American porn sites do these days. The models tease themselves over their panties, they play around with the leg openings of the panties, hand down panties and this leads to the ever-elusive wet spot forming on the panties. I never claimed to be anything less than a pervert. That's erotic to me. When you consider how many solo porn sites bring out the critics saying the woman is not having an orgasm or is faking it, those wet spots could be faked but you can tell they are not. Not just from the wet spots but the nipples about to bust out of the bra.
I wasn't even into Japanese porn back when I joined Idols 69 in, I think, 2008 but I was into Idols 69.
They do have some scenes with kinkier parts. I think Japanese porn was the first porn I saw that had women rimming men. There are threesome scenes where one man is behind the woman and she's rimming a guy in front of her. There are some light "forced" scenes, like a husband holding his wife's arms while another man has sex with her.
This is one that dates my porn-using age. They have 293 photo sets on Idols 69. These are downloadable and they are some of the best picture sets online. The Japanese style of photos also varies greatly from the American style. Each set could easily be 3-4 sets. About 1/4 way through the set, the model is nude, then dressed in a new outfit and another 1/4 of the way through, she's nude again then another outfit. They could get me to join Idols 69 with zero videos. I would join it just for the photos. There's a lot of teasing in the photos. There's upskirts, panties, public, it just looks like they stopped doing the photos based on the difference in number of videos and photo sets.
I'm going to wrap up by saying I'll lower All-Japanese Pass by a couple points since joining through Idols 69 (same price) gives you everything All-Japanese Pass has and Idols 69 too. While this isn't the top of the Japanese sites, no subtitles hurts more than the video quality, in my opinion.
It still is a very good site and network especially for a newcomer to Japanese porn. It took me several years to get to the point where I, first, didn't mind the mosaic/censoring to now, where I actually prefer the censoring/mosaic. Which is why subtitles would help even more. These are mostly fun or quirky or weird scenes. Knowing what is being said would make them even better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest JOI (Jerk Off Instruction) sites I've seen.
- Realistic models with varying body types and looks.
- Some very good dirty talkers, the ages of the models seem to be more in the 25-40 age range so there's very little silly/cutesy talk.
- Easy to use site with no ads.
- Very good technical quality on videos and photo sets.
- Updates daily (video and photo set), sometimes twice per day
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- This is a niche that can be very repetitive. See bottom line.
- Performance quality from model to model varies a great deal.
Bottom Line:
Jerkoff Instruction is far from new to me. One of my all-time favorite sites is Jerkoff Instructors, but it somehow landed on the The Fetish Network and doesn't update anymore.
I'll start with the numbers and technical quality:
283 models and they do have good variety with some Latina models, some chubby ones, some very slim ones and even though I know it's not an amateur site, there are a lot of models here I've never seen before.
5,112 videos. That number really caught me by surprise. These scenes last 8-12 minutes.
2,998 photo sets. These photo sets are not large in number of photos, most are in the 50 photos range, but are a nice touch. These are also downloadable.
The newer videos can be downloaded in 4K, 1080p, 720p and 540p, they can be streamed on mobile devices as well. They have 2,657 videos available in 4K, so right at half of their videos offer 4K. They started offering 4K in April 2015. The very oldest videos (2010) offer 720p and 1080p, so you can see the technical quality here is very high.
Performance quality is a subjective issue. Some of the models seem like they just want the scene to be over. An older married friend told me it's like how handjobs from the wife are after 30 years of marriage. You get the feeling the model is saying "would you just hurry up and finish?"
Other ones are very sexy, models that start off teasing, progressing to topless to saying she's turned herself on so much she's going to masturbate with you.
Some fully masturbate to orgasm, others heavily tease and some get to the point of filthy with their talking.
It almost seems like I'm scoring this site low. They update as fast as any site I've been on lately. Today is the 17th of May, and they have added 26 videos and 24 photo sets in May.
I think my favorite models from this site are Kiki Minaj with 26 scenes and Kiki Devine with 31 scenes, what's with the models named Kiki? There are others here I found very attractive as well.
I think the JOI niche is still underrepresented enough to call the niche, unique, but do admit it gets repetitive. It's not the models fault. There's only so much a woman can say about your dick and using it in her body. Some are much better at it and that's why it's still a high score even if I feel I'm going a little low on the score. Something I think some might not like is they use dildos mounted to the wall so it looks like a POV of getting a blowjob.
They have everything going in the right direction, though. The quality, the updates, the easy to use site and the very attractive models. Those into clothing fetishes will like this site. From upskirts, to upshorts to teasing, panties, hose, they do a good job with working clothing fetishes into the scenes. And highly recommended for those that like JOI or JOE scenes. I think it's the best of the niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- For me, the best handjob site on the internet (Manojob) with two other so-so sites.
- Good navigation, seamlessly move between the sites.
- Decent blend of models, most are younger and white but there is enough diversity not to count it against them.
- Active and helpful webmaster, didn't have any problems this time but have in the past. Responds fast and is courteous.
- Manojob wins me over with this network especially with the "pussy tease" scenes. That's one of my more recent fetishes and they do it well.
- Rocketgate as the biller is back in pros for now. They made me email to cancel recently but the most recent cancel was automated so maybe it was just a glitch.
Cons:
- It's a tough con to hit them with but there is recycling and I understand why. I will explain in BL.
- Mr POV and The Dick Suckers haven't interested me. Take that more as a compliment towards Manojob.
- Updates are no longer dated, three of the four first listed scenes on Manojob are scenes I already have.
Bottom Line:
My apologies to MarcDC. I had already planned on reviewing this network as it has one of my favorite sites in it, Manojob. I normally wouldn't post a review of the same site as someone else on the same day but I don't think our reviews are that far apart either.
Manojob was the first handjob site I remember joining. Before that I would go to Videobox or some other DVD site and download their handjob DVDs. At first, Manojob didn't do a lot to separate itself from the DVDs but over time they started working the pussy tease in, some call it the cameltoe slide.
Mr. POV is an okay site. Anything in gonzo style these days starts to become repetitive to me. The Dick Suckers same problem. They're average sites if that makes it fair.
In the cons I mentioned that there is recycling. I understand that these guys are a small team. They have times where they're filming and can't knock out brand new updates every other day or even every week so they rotate and older, popular scene in as a new update. I'm not going to take off points for it. I'm familiar enough with this site, their webmaster, that I know he busts his ass trying to get quality content up.
The problem for me is scenes get removed to use as new updates. Rear Admiral reviewed the site in 2015 with 1,400+ scenes, TBP reviewed it in 2017 with 1,307 scenes, I reviewed it in 2017 and there was only 1,266 scenes. I made note that the month I reviewed it in had 31 updates in 30 days. This is one of those situations where the webmaster is a nice enough guy if he would just put everything back up and say he could only get 2-4 updates a month, I think it would look better. We know he's not a major production studio and we appreciate the hard work to keep up.
Still not taking points off for it but as of today, 3/17/2020, there are 1,273 scenes. That's 6 more scenes than when I reviewed it 2.5 years ago.
Manojob is still the best handjob site, tease site, in porn.
The scenes are not as basic as they used to be. They've incorporated JOE or JOI, Jerk Off Encouragement and Jerk Off Instruction. The women don't just kneel down and jerk the guy off like old handjob sites did. They now get naked, half-naked, and grind their bodies against the guy's dick. You'll even get a few slipped in penetrations. Those parts are what puts them ahead of everyone else. I'm not even for sure it's that close.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, 1080p, they also have the cumshot only video, a SD version, a mobile version and interview with each model.
I'm going to tell you the scene to watch to see the eroticism handjob porn can have, Teanna Trump, Class of 2014. They should have paid her 10x what they did and I don't know what they paid her.
The downside as I said the last time I reviewed the whole network is I don't see the other two sites coming close to that type of eroticism. They're doing something very rare with the Manojob content. It makes the other two sites feel very plain.
I'm raising my score quite a bit from the last time I reviewed the whole network. That's because the network as a whole frustrated me the previous time I reviewed it. I was frustrated with the disappearing videos. I'm going as high as I can go for the network just because I don't know how much new content they are putting out. They have around 10 4K scenes according to their tag search. If they keep up the Manojob updates and keep working on that erotic part, maybe I would go a little higher.
It would be my first choice recommendation to someone into tease and handjobs just because of Manojobs. Some people would add more for the other two sites. I have never downloaded anything from either. I have watched a few scenes to see if I thought it was worth a download.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best kept secret in porn. Sorry, Cherry Pimps.
- I'm going to put this as a pro as it's not their problem, they have live cam shows that are very good but are currently suspended because of the Coronavirus.
- One of the most impressive networks in terms of technical quality (see bottom line).
- Nearly 1,400 models
- They average an update per day
- 4 Live channels/shows that they keep an archive of.
- Some hidden gems in here like the reason I found Cherry Pimps a few years ago, Aaliyah Love's solo site is in here. She has over 300 scenes here.
- They have the Cherry of the Month where they pick one model and they release new videos and photos of her throughout the month.
- Very good download speeds (80-85% of max)
Cons:
- It could be better laid out. (see bottom line)
- The tags could be better. They have some tags that have 2-3 scenes and there's tags they're missing. It's not a big deal but you have to nitpick these guys. It's one of the best networks on the internet.
- Maybe could use a boost in creativity. Scenes can become repetitive here.
Bottom Line:
The very first time I joined this network, I didn't even know it was a network. I joined Aaliyah Love's solo site. I noticed there were some other sites but I was focused on Aaliyah's site. Then, I joined Cherry Pimps and there was Aaliyah Love's solo site. Their history isn't real clear to me. At one time, I think they had 4 or 5 solo sites and still might. It doesn't show itself as a network anymore. It's one big site with everything mixed in.
You have to be ready to prowl around and see what you can find.
The Cherry of the Month is a big selling point to me since I was a huge fan of Twisty's Treat of the Month. It works very similar to that and last month, Vina Sky was the Cherry of the Month.
The technical quality is different here than a lot of sites. I think they might be the only one that does this. The newer videos have:
4K
1080p @ 20mbps
1080p @ 15mbps
1080p @ 10mbps
720p
480p
They give you three bitrate options on the 1080p videos and all of these options come with your membership. No extra charges.
They have full photo sets, screencaps, plus the live shows. I know that Rear Admiral wondered how he could have missed this site. It's really not been around that long. A lot of that older content was from the old network that Aaliyah Love's site was on. TBP has Cherry Pimps first listed in 2012.
The content might be the weakest part. It's gonzo type porn. Very little stories or anything to draw you in. It reminds me a lot of the old Twistys site. You went for the models and that's exactly how it feels here. If you're an Aaliyah fan they have over 300 scenes of her. For those that like dirty talk, you don't know what you're missing if you've not watched her solo porn.
It then becomes a treasure hunt as you dig through the pages and pages of models. They have some models here that I'm not used to seeing much of like Lylith LaVey, she normally wouldn't catch my eye but she did and she became one of my favorites on here.
The Cherry of the Month is one of the best features a site can do. Ever once in awhile they'll get one I don't really like but most of the time it's either a model I like or I start liking.
There's a little of everything here as well. They have over 3,000 solo scenes. You're not going to get through this site in a month. I'm currently on my 6th month and I still haven't found everything.
It could be recommended to almost anyone that's into porn. My score isn't probably as high as it should be. The site has changed on me. This is not the same site it was in 2017. It's probably losing a few points because I can't find what I'm looking for.
They do promote the pimp.xxx network and it was cross-sale when I joined. I don't know if maybe some of the content I'm looking for went to that network. If you join it plan on staying awhile.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best tease sites on the internet. Also can be accessed through the Only All network.
- I think most of the models are amateurs but I do not guarantee it. I am rarely familiar with models on these sites.
- The people that run this site know what they are doing and they do these niches as good as anyone.
- The videos are better than I would normally expect from a tease site.
- The photos are very high quality, nearing 6000 long end and they have a nice flow to their sets, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are fast (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
- The Only All network is a must join at least once for those that like softcore content.
- Clean site layout, one small ad at the bottom of the pages.
- Three updates per day, three photo sets one day, two photo sets and a video the next.
- Nearly 1,000 models on Only Tease.
Cons:
- Navigation could be better. Will explain in BL.
- The sites live up to their names, there are some known hardcore models on here like Zafira, she shows a little more than other models but it is still "tease". Not a problem for me but could be for others.
Bottom Line:
I have a review of Only Tease here on Porn Users from 2008. Back then, I don't remember them having a full network like now. I will also review the network separately.
The navigation is my only real complaint. I was trying to put together a count of the models and noticed it isn't as easy to do as I expected. In the model list, you can select each letter of the alphabet, it lists all the models of that letter. This is a common problem with large sites. If you do not know who you are looking for you are going to have a lot of clicking to do. This part takes on an even worse twist. I don't know how you could fix that problem. I was always told you can't complain about something unless you know how to fix it. There also is the compliment of this con. It was the only complaint I had.
Sites like these are rare. They do what they are supposed to do and you will rarely see a set that breaks their system or flow. I talked about the flow of their photo sets. The first 30 photos are usually not sexually provocative. They can make them seem to be by focusing on the model's butt or boobs but they are fully dressed and doing daily tasks. It is like people watching. The next 30 show the model being more "aware" that you are looking at her. She will give you a little extra bend across the desk or counter or chair. The next 30 the clothes start to come unbuttoned and so on. There are sets that show everything but not in a wide open spread way.
Almost all sets, at the very least, end with the model topless and in her panties/hose. The interest for me is often the first 60 pictures. There's a voyeuristic nature to those. Like when you go to the bank to get a loan and find yourself checking the loan officer out.
The quality of the photos is about as high as you find. You also will get roughly 130 photos per set. Only Tease is a little different than the other Only All sites because it is not a specific type of clothes/outfit/costume. You could say it is like a compilation of all the Only All sites.
Sites like these usually leave a lot to be desired in the videos but Only Tease's videos are better than most art/tease videos. They are usually sexually provocative. A lot of artsy sites just have the model standing around naked or teasing. Only tease goes more into the bending over, on all fours (in clothes often).
One thing you will realize with Only Tease and the Only All sites in general is there are models that are made for this type of "porn". You can even see it in the number of sets they have of certain models. Porchia W is one of those made for this type of porn. She has 119 photo sets, 24 videos that's a total of almost 12,000 pictures just of her. One of my favorites is Amelie, she only has 6 photo sets and 2 videos. Nearly all models have multiple sets and just glancing over the models I would say more than 50 have at least 20 sets.
This is one of those sites that should brag about their numbers! The site is also nice and clean with one little banner ad at the bottom. They also have features to make using their site more customized. You can click on any photo set "add to customized set". A box shows up on each picture. You click the pictures you want to put in your set. It's a very in-depth feature that photo collectors like to see. I would also think fetishists that maybe just like upskirts with (color) panties.
Those are the people a site like this appeals to. While a site like Kink appeals to your nude fetishes, penetration fetishes, a site like Only Tease appeals to your clothing, daily situation fetishes.
It is an example of how experience pays off. You just one see much on here that makes you think "what were they thinking?" The models are nearly all attractive in a "she could work in my office" kind of way. The only sets I do not like that much on Only Tease are the bedroom ones. Having it in the bedroom, a private room, takes away the "oh she is getting my file out of the cabinet". I am mostly saying once in the privacy of a bedroom our minds change about what we are looking at.
It still is an excellent site. You can still join these Only All sites as standalone sites for $24.95 each or you can join the entire network for $34.95 thanks to the TBP/PU price.
Overall, you can build an entire porn photo collection with Only Tease or the network. And also have yourself a nice collection of tease based videos. Recommended for those that like panties, hose, downblouse, upskirt, believable office and tease content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that I thought had died off but is running strong now.
- CCBill as biller, this didn't used to be the case.
- Roughly 1,200 CFNM themed scenes with photos and screencaps as well.
- Over 500 models.
- Download speeds reach 80% of my max.
- CFNM is a genre that touches on multiple niches and it's one of my favorite non-mainstream porn genres.
- Network includes 6 sites with themes they follow: Lady Voyeurs, Little Dick, Girls Abuse Guys, Amateur CFNM, CFNM Games and the flagship site Pure CFNM.
- There's a story to the scenes though don't expect in Oscar-winning acting performances.
- Pictures and screencaps are downloadable and add the same element those add in exhibitionism porn, see BL.
- One of the best navigating networks I've used.
- No set update schedule but they added 17 scenes in March and so far have added 8 in April.
- While the models aren't sold as amateurs except on the one site, I don't hardly know any of these models.
Cons:
- I think CFNM can be a polarizing genre. This network probably makes the clear too with some scenes that include the women using strap-ons on the men.
- The biggest problem is it's biggest strength. It's unique when compared to today's mainstream porn but it also can be repetitive.
Bottom Line:
CFNM has been one of my favorite genres since the first time I saw a CFNM scene. The one thing that can make the scenes better or worse is the acting ability of those in the scene. Most of these scenes are supposed to have a surprised, shocked beginning for the women but probably 50% of the time the actresses overact and oversell their shock and surprise.
The good thing is there's probably more CFNM content on this network than all other CFNM sites combined. All of the big networks have tried CFNM but none are still shooting it and most have under 100 scenes while this network has around 1,200 scenes.
The basis of the scenes is a woman, usually group of women, walk in on a guy masturbating, catch him looking at them while masturbating and their "punishment" for him is to make him finish masturbating while they watch. Lady Voyeurs is probably the closest to how the genre started and I noticed the scenes on it are only 480p, so those really might be the original scenes.
The basis has of course gotten lost which I prefer the new style better. Now, the women catch the guy and help him with 4-5 women giving him a handjob, there's usually that one woman who gets too aroused and turns it into a blowjob and some of the time it will turn into full sex. I was watching a scene and thought "This is what mainstream porn doesn't have in it anymore." And I think that's exactly the attraction to this style of porn. You're going to get tease in it, voyeurism, upskirts, panties, fully clothed with stripping and if I'm guessing if the women can't finish their job with their hand it becomes blowjob and sex.
The pictures and screencaps add a lot. Similar to exhibitionism porn, the stills allow you to see upskirts you wouldn't have seen in the video, the expressions on the women's faces and throw in hard nipples you wouldn't have noticed.
The navigation is very good. Everything is integrated. You can bounce from one site to another with one click, no sign in again. There also is the option of going to a hub-style page that lists all the updates across the network. Somehow they added a model list too and I only mention that because there are multiple models in nearly all scenes. They have done a good job of putting this network together.
I will mention again, there is some content that some might not like but some is also not as bad as the names suggest. Girls Abuse Guys is just soft domination, pretty much what CFNM started out as. There are scenes with the woman or women using strap-ons on the guy. The Little Dick site is a lot like Bang Bros CFNM Show, women laugh and pick on the guy for his lack of size while he tries to get off. You're not going to see anything that's comparable to the rougher dominant male sites.
There is the possibility of the content becoming repetitive, I think this wouldn't be as likely if the acting was better. This still is a relatively rare genre as most of the big networks have all tried CFNM but most feedback from their webmasters was it costs too much, is not that popular but I do believe it's becoming more popular. I did add the numbers in my head and believe if you joined every CFNM site on the major networks you would have around 400 scenes or you can join here and have 1,200+.
I mentioned the network using CCBill, it makes me wonder with the greatly-improved navigation if they've switched owners or management. Also, the 17 updates a month is unheard of on a CFNM site.
It's now one of my current favorites and for the time being it's being added to my FTV/Zishy recurring memberships. Very impressed. Apologies to Mbaya on reviewing the site just a few months after he did but I also agree with his review.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is owned by the same company that owns Brazzers, with more amateur level models and not as many fake boobs.
- Video technical quality is top of the line. From the best I can tell, unless there are some old videos I haven't seen, every video I've downloaded has had a 1080p option.
- Every set has photo and screenshots options with zip downloads. The older pictures are only 1300 long end, but the majority are 2000 long end or higher.
- Prefer the model selection here over any of the other networks. All races of models covered nicely which is rare in networks these days.
- Not quite as much silliness or goofiness that other networks have.
- Navigation is good except for one big con listed below in cons.
- Besides the sites that come with the network, there are 32 bonus sites, these include one Brazzers site, A Day with a Pornstar, ZZ Insider, Spunk Network and the rest looks to be licensed DVDs, includes most niches, including BBW, so they're digging deep.
Cons:
- Not a lot of cons, but if one stands out the most it is the lack of a model search by name. Instead, you get the options of 18-25, Europeans, and so on, but no direct model search. What this amounts to is scanning through until you find a model you're looking for, clicking her name, then marking her as a favorite to go back to and download.
- This is more of an annoyance con, when you click on a site from the main network page, you get a full page ad that you have to close to get to the site.
- Sort of a pro/con both, quite a few ads, but some are really good deals.
Bottom Line:
After Brazzers impressed me with their improvements on their network I decided to take a shot at this smaller network they also own or manage.
I'm glad I did. The best way for me to describe this network is to say this is what Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros were before they ended up with so much content that they are overwhelming and have older lesser quality content. Everything here is high quality, 1080p option, though I honestly don't download those highest quality videos because the file sizes near 3 GB each.
The video options on the newest videos are mp4, wmv 1080p, wmv 720p and those three also have SD versions for those that don't want to download files that range from 1-3 GB each. Most of the SD ones are 500-800 MB each and look very good. The picture sets are huge. The ones I have downloaded go in excess of 200 pictures each with a 2000 long end on the resolution.
The only option I've seen missing on the older videos is the mp4 option.
Also what I think has been done on this network is someone is listening to the complaints on the other networks. The sites on here all go into niches, instead of trying to be a reality niche with the same theme from site to site. There's a solo site, an "amateur" site though these are mostly new(er) pornstars, there is a party site with group sex, an exhibitionist/voyeur type site, an interracial site, a worldwide model site, some "classic" scenes, one "reality" themed of "at work" and two other group competition sites.
This creates a very nice balance. The cons, that model search function really needs to be added. I have to think Emy Reyes is on here somewhere, but I'm still scrolling through the sites trying to find her. If there is a model search, would appreciate someone pointing me to it.
Since I've been a member, they average more than 1 update per day with some days getting two. Maybe less is better? Quality over quantity? The ads will annoy you at first especially the splash screen when you click on a site to go to, but maybe I'm just imagining this, but they seem to be less and less the further I get into the membership. Maybe it's the first time you visit a site?
It also has that toolbar/sidebar thing that a lot of sites are going to. I don't use it. It has links for the 32 bonus sites, your account, etc...
At the top you have a link for your favorites. It's a nice site design, not cluttered at all. At first, I didn't think I was going to go this high with the score, because it's not as big as most networks, but with the content they have being high quality, I think it offsets the lower number of content. On the confusion with how much content is on here, I'm guessing the higher number includes the bonus sites. There still is a lot of content here and considering the high technical quality of them, plus me preferring these models as a whole, it's better than the majority of networks to me.
Highly recommended, you'll probably be as surprised as I was.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the highest quality technical sites on the internet. Breakdown in bottom line.
- Updates started slow in 2001, but are now coming at a rate of roughly 3 per week, includes photos and videos per update.
- Several models you won't see on many other sites and some I've never seen on other sites, the positive to that, also has most of the usual stars.
- Picture sets are zipped and can be downloaded in small or large sizes.
- Plenty of tease, plenty of masturbation and plenty of close-ups.
- Locations are usually almost as beautiful as the models.
- Models, for me, are as close to 100% downloads. Very few if any models that aren't stunningly attractive.
- Navigation is good once you get the hang of it.
- Download speed hasn't been a problem am downloading at 95% of my max speed.
Cons:
- Videos are split into parts. Almost didn't put this here in cons since there is a pattern to the splits. One may be the lead-in/tease. The next pissing. The next masturbation. The splits don't so much overlap as older split videos did.
- Video quality on older sets pales in comparison to the newer videos.
- Photo sets could be bigger. Seeing that the scenes as a whole total nearly an hour on average, anything less than 100 photos seems to be shorting the photo fans.
Bottom Line:
I thought I would try to review this site a little differently than normal. The reason being, early in the site's life the updates were sporadic and the quality was okay. They've picked up the pace quite a bit while improving the technical quality a great deal.
From March 2001 to August 5, 2007 the site had a total of only 113 updates. That's less than 2 per month. The quality on these videos tops out at 640x480 and the lower quality option is 320x240.
The photos during this time ranged from 758 high end to 1800 high end.
Starting on August 13th, 2007 the videos top quality jumped to 1920x1080, there also is a 1280x720 option and a 640x360 option.
Besides the big upgrade in quality, the updates started coming more often. Since August 2007 through November 2010, there has been 367 updates or an average of roughly 10 updates per month and all have been with the 1920x1080 option.
The pictures got another boost in late 2007 to 2000 high end and later in 2008 went up to 2400 high end.
I just found that worth mentioning since not only have they increased their updates around 400%, but tripled the technical quality too. That makes the price (35 USD) not a con. It's nice to see a site changing everything for the better.
Problems with the site, there are speculum parts, pissing parts and the close-ups may be a bit much for some. The good thing here, these are usually separated by part so if you would have fast-forwarded those parts, you can just save the hassle by not downloading the parts you don't like.
No problems with the models at all. A very good blend of models from all around the world and a good mix of ethnic backgrounds.
Navigation is broken down for you. You can search by model name. Model nationality. Model age. Year released. And a few bonus points here for naming the videos whatever the scene is named. Instead of some generic number name that no one but their programmer understands.
Unless I missed something there are no boy/girl scenes, but there are some girl/girl scenes with the vast majority being solo. I'm thinking I'm going to need to ask Santa Claus for a new hard drive just for the content I get from this site.
By percent, 76% of the sets are available in 1920x1080. I'm almost positive no other site can say that. My biggest surprise was the diversity of models. It looks to have started out with more Euro models, but it has balanced out with Hispanic, Asian, American (white and black) models showing up too.
I guess if I had to pick something to change it would be to offer a full scene download for those of us that have fast connections. Oh and it signs me out too often. A download had finished, maybe 5 minutes passed and I clicked the next scene to download and was signed out.
That's minor though when you consider the overall quality of this site. Would push the score even higher if the photo sets had more photos in them. Highly recommended especially for tech quality lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My favorite of the big booty, big booby, networks. Tons of content, multiple sites that could stand on their own.
- Despite the daily download limit of 10 GB, I'm not bothered by it. If it were 1-2 GB per day, that would bother me, but as it is, I could realistically download 300 GB in a month.
- TBP discounted price
- Covering most of the bases when it comes to broad range of cultures, white girls, Latinas, black girls, this is what sells the site to me.
- Some of the sites included have been longtime favorites like Mike in Brazil, 8th Street Latinas and Round and Brown.
- Quality is good enough for me. Newest download from Mike in Brazil is 720x404 with 1400 bitrate. Will further this thought in BL.
- Each video comes with zipped screenshots, I like these as a throw-in, but they're not going to blow you away with quality.
- I'm getting good connection and DL speed, about 95% of my max download speed
- Daily updates
Cons:
- The download limit could be a con to some, but I do have trouble listing that a site with what equals a 300 GB monthly limit equals a con. I only have a few site folders over the years that total 300 GB.
- I have found a few, probably less than 1% of the videos that are not available anymore.
- Content can be repetitive. Then again curvy butts never get repetitive to me!
- Some of the sites are no longer updating. I thought CFNM Secret had a ton of potential, but only one update this month.
- Some of the older content on the longer running sites is split into parts on the videos.
Bottom Line:
This is a re-review of a site that I hadn't been back on since about 2 years ago. I had to talk to myself reasonably about the DL Limit and how 300 GB in a month is more content than I usually download from any site in a month. This network, like Brazzers and Bang Bros is very high on the curvy models. I like Reality Kings a bit better because my favorite models are Latinas and they have a lot of Latina content.
The sites I like best with the network in order:
Mike's Apartment - Almost 100% Euro models in mostly hardcore action, a few solo and g/g sets. 8th Street Latinas - Mostly straightforward hardcore sex. Mike In Brazil - The Brazilian girls in hardcore action. Serious booty moving in these. MILF Hunter - Late 20s, early 30s models in hardcore action.
Round and Brown - Mostly black girls, but some dark Latinas as well, more curves than the autobahn.
In the VIP - Gives you a bit of a voyeur feel since they are supposed to be in a club. We Live Together - G/G/G sometimes more! Older sets are much better than the newer ones though. Money Talks - Takes on a bit of an exhibitionist side. Models, women on the street are offered money to show skin in public. Also has some terribly painful humiliation clips including a guy putting his dick in a mouse trap for money.
Those are the ones off the top of the head, but I have content from all 28 sites. All follow the curvy theme. I think Mike's Apartment could easily stand on its own, don't get any ideas Reality Kings! 8th Street Latinas as well. Both have years of content built up.
Onto the quality issue. My biggest concern with Reality Kings advertising HD on their main page, is just think how fast the download limit would fill up. The most recent Mike in Brazil clip is 720x404, 1400 bitrate, right at 40 minutes long and is 418 MB in size, double that to HD and the amount is near 1 GB, with a 10 GB limit per day that could become frustrating.
I do like the screenshots that you can download. These more of less look like a picture you or I could have taken with our personal camera. These are especially good in the Money Talks series. You can see that the content is live and the public is walking by without noticing.
They do have a CFNM site, if you've followed my reviews, these are usually well-liked by females, my wife likes them, but they aren't updating much anymore. They also didn't follow the CFNM rules, but it is still good. In their CFNM the man eventually gets more than a handjob.
For me, the network is as good or really better than most DVD sites since the different sites separate the content into niche for you. They do also have a bit more variety than the other networks mentioned have. One thing to keep in mind. Eventually you get tired of any niche. This is where repetition sets in.
Overall though, Euros, Latinas, black girls, white girls, it is like a buffet of women to me! DL limit notwithstanding, I recommend it, especially for the discounted price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My original review expired yesterday, so here is a newly updated review to reflect the changes in Teen Dreams and it received a boost in the score from my 2007 review. One of the internet's biggest sites around.
- New servers deliver lightning fast downloads to me, US based as are the servers, regularly hits 100% of my max DL speed when using DownThemAll with Firefox
- The content over the last few years sees a raise in quality, pics top out in the 2500ish range and come zipped.
- Viv Thomas "bonus" content is equal to full access to the Viv Thomas video site and photo site as well. BL explains.
- Video quality is above average, 640-720 high end, 2000+ bitrates on last two years videos.
- Site forum is not only active, but has one of the funnest, most helpful and most knowledgeable groups of porn fans on it, outside of PU of course! Customer service is very responsive.
- Less than $20 price is icing on the cake
- Six updates per day, five days per week
Cons:
- Navigation has improved, but still could be hard for some to get used to. I've noticed that now when you click on a letter in the model list, the models come up alphabetically. Used to this wasn't the case, so this isn't quite the con it once was.
- Still suffers from alias problems when naming models. Sandra Shine is listed as Judith for example. I just pick a letter or two at a time and scan through them for recognizable faces.
- Videos named the same!
Bottom Line:
I have been impressed with the forward progress this site has made. Back when it seemed to be stalling in its progress, they picked up the Viv Thomas bonus content.
The Viv picture sets are not in zips, but you can download them all with DownThemAll add-on with Firefox. Also, the videos on Viv's bonus content are not as high quality as the ones you get from Viv's official video site, but they are 640 high end 750-1000 bitrate and look plenty good enough considering those come from a site that is $30 a month! His videos adds a lot of depth to this site as well. Viv has always been one of my favorites of Euro videos, hardcore, solo, girl/girl, those are all here for you to download and it comes free with Teen Dreams.
One thing I forgot to mention in the pros is the use of "guest models". This is an interesting feature that adds 25 pictures per set from other sites and lets you get a sampling of those site's content, quality and maybe even discover a new model or two.
The biggest complaint that I remember members having about TD is the speed of downloads. I've tried various download managers with the site and find that some won't work, Free Download Manager doesn't seem to work with the site, but try DownThemAll add-on for Firefox. Change the filter to download only movie and archive files, right click the page, click down them all and it will load up the videos and zip/rar files and do the work for you. Really pushes my speed limit as well, I had never seen my speed top 1,200 kb/s but it has here, 1,296 kb/s. I do limit my number of connections to 2 though.
Despite the old issues with finding models you are looking for, the site's navigation once you find the said model is really easy to work with. All the picture sets come up for the model and the movies as well, with DownThemAll, you can skip even having to click on each set to download.
Picture size is coming in at just under 2500 high end. Movies at 640-720 high end with 2000 bitrates. Pretty impressive numbers for a site that updates 30 times per week!
I want to compare it to Twistys, but I think there are a few notable differences. Like another site, Nubiles, Teen Dreams does shoot plenty of never before seen models, giving it more of an amateur feel than Twistys has. That is probably a major pro for some of you, but you all know me, I like my major glam models that I'm used to!
There is really no way for me to guess what the percentage of exclusive and non-exclusive content there is. For me, Twisty's Treat edges Teen Dreams out here. Though there is exclusive content on here, especially in the solo videos. Love the Eve Angel in the bathroom video, staring at herself in the mirror and brushing her hair obviously turns her on as much as it does me since she ends up with one foot on the sink and masturbating.
The amount of content can be overwhelming. I usually stay a member for 3 months at a time, then come back the next year. I like the changes and definitely recommend it!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My new favorite of the picture heavy sites, TBP price of $19.95 is a bargain, as is the year deal of $99.99.
- 4 updates per day
- There could be bigger, but the biggest resolution I'm seeing right now is 3744x5616, all sets are zipped.
- Amount of content is overwhelming, more than I have been able to go through in 3 months.
- After much thought, I consider the lack of many movies a pro. The movies they do have rarely compare to the photo sets.
- Movies are high quality technically and come in DIVX, QT H264, IPOD, WMV and MPEG.
- Navigation is pretty simple to use considering the amount of content.
- DL speed uses about 98% of my max speed
Cons:
- Movies to me are not worth downloading, and if they didn't post them, I wouldn't complain.
- Hard to believe, but some of the g/g sets to me take away from the solo sets.
- If you like anything that has to do with penetration, even solo, this isn't the site for you and wasn't for me a few years ago.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first reviewed Met-Art, I gave it an 80. I felt at that time, I was being nice with that score. If nothing else, the 80 was my way of saying at least everything is high quality and they update consistently.
Things have changed, I hadn't been a member in a year. I joined again and it was like a whole new world opened up to my perverted eyes. There still are sets that I find annoying, poses for example, but I'm finding much more to like now than I did two years ago.
The models range from typical slim models to average weight and bust. There aren't many Daisy DDDD cups here.
I think my change in how I look at this site came about when on a forum of a well-known Euro photographer, I read a post by him that said his sets when viewed told a story and that "some people don't get that story". I looked at Met-Art's sets that way and now will be joining for a year as soon as my monthly subscription runs out.
The resolution size of the pictures is huge. Those high 4000s images are almost like looking at a map! You scroll sideways or up and down and those are really amazing to look at in that much detail.
It probably didn't hurt that I developed myself a crush on Lidiya A and probably 30 other models. Including some of my longtime favorites like Zafira, Eve, Aneta.
My cons for this site are limited to things that I think could/would be cons to others. The videos are photoshoots or biographies/interviews. These are also quite large files. I downloaded one a few days ago that was 500 MB+, and it was nothing more than videoing the photoshoot. I also think the g/g sets are not near as good as the solo sets, though I haven't seen them all.
I am seeing more variety in their models than I had noticed in my earlier review and that helps me add the points to this re-review.
The search feature can be a hassle, at least for me, I'm not real specific in my searches, so I end up with hundreds of results, that is probably more my fault, but I don't know any of the set filenames, so how would I know what to search for using that function? In time, I would guess the search will be more functional for me as I get used to the site and its filenaming.
The locations are usually only second to the models in beauty also. I did run into a few blurry pictures here and there, but I'm not really complaining.
I had thought about sending their webmaster an email to ask a question, but haven't yet, so I don't know how their customer service is. To give an example of how much content there is, my question was going to ask who the model is in the thumbnail over "Your Profile", she is brunette, white lacy top opened to the middle and looks to be a matching skirt. I thought it was Zafira, but it isn't. So, I'm stuck looking through every model's page at the covers, hoping to find out who she is.
To me, that is a credit to how large the site is and how much content they have, add the very high quality and I have a new favorite photo site, recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Formerly Tug Pass, a handjob focused network, but offers more than just handjobs.
– Unlimited video downloads and most have 720p and 1080p
– Download speeds are good (80% my max).
– Includes access to Handjob Hub
– 15+ sites are advertised as part of the Nookies network.
– Quantity in a relatively rare niche is the biggest pro.
Cons:
– Many years of joining Tug Pass and have heard quite a few negative comments about the attractiveness of their models. Rebranding doesn't change that.
– No 4K for the resolution lovers
– If you were going to judge the entire network on technical quality, it would be average or at best, slightly above average.
Bottom Line:
I remember reviewing Tug Pass a long time ago and within minutes, someone replied and commented on the models being old and unattractive. Old, I don't think, can really be subjective, but attractiveness is. I am not saying those models from the older scenes were top tier in looks, but this is a handjob site, not a glam site.
I can tell you the models started getting younger and more attractive, but we get to see the pro/con at work. Those older, less attractive models, really seemed to enjoy playing with dicks. Sure, you can make the joke that they don't get many in real life, but can't deny their performances are great. The newer, younger models do sometimes seem more bored than anything and I think that's expected with handjob porn.
Once beyond that, you have a network here, Nookies, that offers one of the biggest handjob collections you will ever find. Their videos and pictures sets are both over 3,000. Not all are handjob only, there are scenes of nearly all male/female niches.
I believe having more than just handjob scenes has helped the network. Having unlimited downloads is a major pro, too. The video quality is good enough. That is my way of saying, unless you're wanting the highest video quality possible, you will be happy with these videos. I still am mostly downloading 720p. I won't give the long explanation, but the short one says I have some vision damage and really can't see a huge difference between 720p and 1080p and see even less with 4K. I do believe video resolution preference has a lot to do with how long you've been viewing online porn. HD was such a major step up from SD. It makes HD more than good enough for me.
The handjob genre is covered well. Several of the models, especially in older scenes, were and maybe still are experts in milking and edging.
Navigation is good, but could be better. I've been using online porn long enough that I rarely need navigation or tags to lead me to what I'm looking for.
Besides the unlimited videos, you can also download unlimited photo zips and there's the added “bonus” of being able to access Handjob Hub Premium.
Handjob Hub Premium is owned by Nookies and is a handjob tube site. A lot of the content on Handjob Hub Premium is from Nookies, minus the cumshots, yeah, not kidding. They do have some scenes not from Nookies so there's a little bonus to the content. It's just not as big of a deal as it is advertised as.
The Nookies scenes do not cut out the cumshots.
I am scoring this network higher than I expected when I joined it. Some of the reasons include: The newer scenes are trying to add new elements even to the handjob scenes. They seem to be aiming for various niches like voyeurism and teasing. Personally, I would rather see a site or network, trying something different and unique, than adding 4K videos. The older scenes relied on the woman taking on a nearly dominant role, while the newer scenes show the male, while physically in the submissive role, turning it into more of a neutral role where the woman is getting as much out of the physical stimulation as the guy is, without the woman needing the dom role. I like it. It's a real evolution in human sexuality. It's nice to see a woman enjoying herself making the guy cum, not because she's feeling superior.
Maybe it's the key to porn’s future success even? So many females seem to struggle with anything presenting themselves as dominant. These newer scenes are showing a compromise, the middle ground, where the male and female are more focused on being playful and enjoying their sexuality, instead of worrying about who is dom and who is sub.
A good network that's somehow, in 2024, improving themselves instead of rehashing their past success.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A justifiably polarizing network
- High quality throughout, downloads are unlimited, videos are HD and even some 4K
- Photosets are also downloadable and are 3,500 long end
- Segpay is the biller and they are one of the better billers for Asian porn
- Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
- 7 sites are included
Cons:
- The pricing is annoying. Some of their cheaper offers don’t tell you they are streaming only.
- Nonsensical, illogical, and any other word describing “what are they thinking?”
- The bad sites on the network aren’t even worth clicking on
Bottom Line:
Why the high score if polarizing? Because I’ve been a member off and on for 5 years. I’ve got over the problems and frustrations and just accepted those problems. We will start off with the most obvious of the problems. The company that owns this network also owns another Asian network and for some reason insists on splitting the content up into two networks even though the content is often the same niche and genre. That stands out most when you join Creampie Asia. That site is nowhere near the best site on the network, but it is the flagship or hub site for this network. Also on this network is Thai Girls Wild, possibly the best, most authentic Thai pornsite in existence.
I do generally prefer the Thai models in porn. I’m not for sure if their culture is just more open to sexuality than other Asian cultures, but the models do seem more experienced and even skilled. Thai Girls Wild shows that as best as possible. Not only does the site have around 400 scenes, but even has some downloads in 4K quality, which Creampie Asia, doesn’t have any of. Thai Girls Wild is fun and sexy, much like I see Thai women. I would join this network just for Thai Girls Wild.
You also will receive access to Submit My Thai, an amateur, self-submitted site that is also fun and sexy. But, if you want Creampies in Thais, you will have to join their other network.
Creampie Asia falls short, by itself, when compared to Creampie Thai. It only has a fraction of the content.
To my surprise with these networks is the pictures. Thai Girls Wild has around 800 photosets and those can be downloaded with the newer sets having 3,000 long end resolution. I think the key word to the review is authentic.
Between the two networks and their 16-17 sites, the best site of the bunch, for me, is Thai Girls Wild and I even feel like they know that. It has the highest video quality and is one of their biggest sites between the networks. That makes this network a slight favorite over their other network. I also like that this one comes with several solo model sites. Those sites are older and the content is nowhere near the technical quality we are used to, but it’s not common to find real, Thai, amateur solo models. The theme for this network and their other network should be, “take the good with the bad”.
That gives us two very good networks that could be top of the class if they were combined into one network. Definitely worth a join even if only for Thai Girls Wild.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the oldest interracial networks online.
- Introduced me to Gloryhole porn many years ago.
- Has over 20 included sites.
- Over 1,600 models.
- Around 15 updates per month.
- Fast download speeds (85% of my max
- Epoch is the biller and promos go for as cheap as $15 per month.
Cons:
- They’re a victim of their own success. Many niches they have started have now become common across the internet and it’s easy to forget where it all started.
- All niches become repetitive and that goes for the majority of this network.
Bottom Line:
Dogfart was one of those networks that everyone into porn knew about. It was near impossible to view a porn TGP site without seeing dozens of clips from Blacks on Blondes. That was and still is the closest they have to a flagship site. Gloryhole.com is included and was the first time I ever saw gloryhole porn … in porn. They tried to make Gloryhole more exciting and new/fresh with their site Gloryhole Initiations.
There’s bad news in that if you never really liked this network you still won’t but that brings the good news of if you ever liked it, you likely still will. You just aren’t going to see anything new or that different between the newest updates and updates from 10 years ago. It’s the classic formula of don’t fix what isn’t broken. With that said, I only need to join the network once every few years. There’s just not a lot in the newer content for someone who has seen it before.
The good news continues with the 1080p downloadable videos though you will have to pay extra if you want 4K. There are also pictures available for download in zips. The navigation is as good as it can be. They also are still updating on average of a new scene every other day. This is one of those networks that price has to play a factor in the score. The promos are usually for $14.95 per month and considering you get new updates plus the thousands of old scenes, the price and value could be the biggest pro. That is if you like interracial porn.
The sites that have offer some variety. There is a cuckold site, a handjob site, gloryhole/blowjob site, a lesbian site, multiple hardcore sites and they even add a couple of gay sites for good balance.
The biggest problem comes with the execution. Sites like Gloryhole have no room to progress or grow. Blacks on Blondes really doesn’t either, I’m not even for sure how these sites could be progressed and that’s our biggest problem here. If you like for things to stay the same, you will appreciate the consistency of the scenes. If you like for something more, progressive, some change, you’re not going to get much of that. The majority of the content was established in shooting style over a decade ago and they do the style well. If you need some change or variety, you should only join for 1 month at a time.
I do believe it is still the best interracial site or network. It should be approached that way and with plenty of time. It is an overwhelming network considering how large it is. It’s still good for newcomers as the site is very easy to use and there’s enough good porn to keep you happy and satisfied for a while.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Canadian hardcore by a porn group, Radical Entertainment, that has produced some of my favorite sites (Alt Erotic, Purgatory X and all the way back to San Diego Latinas in 2007).
- Plenty of pretty models, alternative models (tattoos, piercings). (See Bottom Line)
- Covers many niches including lesbian, threesomes and group
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Good body type mixture from the models. Could improve the mixture of races.
- Over 1,100 scenes but only 250 photo sets (see cons)
- Streaming only unless you get a year subscription which includes downloads. Price makes it an okay join to see if you would like it for a full year. I do.
Cons:
- Even though most of the women are attractive to very attractive some of them couldn’t give me a free blowjob even if I was horny. That is my sensitive side! It’s Canadian.
- Their pictures are really good, up to 5000 long end even but they must not have zips in Canada. You can ice skate, but you can’t put pictures in a zip?
Bottom Line:
I know it’s not relevant to this review but I first knew of this group of sites in 2007 when I joined San Diego Latinas. Which was a really good site in 2007. I haven’t seen it lately it’s on a network this porn group has.
They have impressed me with Alt Erotic and Purgatory X. Somewhere in the middle is this AD4X site. There’s no downloads. If you join for a year, there are downloads. I think it’s a good enough site to join for year. The worst part about it besides no zips is some of the guys. It’s not that they’re that bad. Maybe they’re going for a theme that I don’t get. The one guy Alex Duca, he’s in scenes with a hoodie on and sweatpants that are pulled down and that’s during the sex. He looks like the my precious thing from Lord of the Rings. Porn is creepy enough. All of his scenes aren’t bad it’s just you will get random scenes on here that look like someone had an idea and it went awry.
That is the worst part of the site so that’s saying the rest is good. The porn they shoot is good. It’s hardcore when it needs to be. That’s something most studios just don’t get. If you have the downloads those include 1080 and you can stream for the $14.95 price. I think that we are going to see that on a lot of sites. I would like to see the price a little lower for the stream-only option but if you find a site that has a lot of content you would want, it’s worth $14.95.
I picked on a small portion of their models but overall, I really like their model selection and the scenes they put the models in. They have a lot of models that have what I think is a Canadian look. That is a mixture of races. Some look Asian at one angle then Hispanic at the other angle. I like models like that. You can always skip the less attractive ones. I do feel similar about their site Alt Erotic’s models.
I never see reviews mention one of my favorite parts of this site. It’s stashed away in a tab called “Channels” and it’s the casting videos. It’s called Casting Party. They have stopped updating it, but it has around 150 scenes and you could easily miss it. Those are some of the best amateur group scenes I’ve ever seen. Those are worth the year subscription so you can download all of them. That’s less than $1 each. Those are the hardcore equivalent of ALS Scan’s beach videos. If you get all those, the regular content is updating once per week, and they have over 1,000 scenes.
The pictures are frustrating. They have nearly 5000 long end resolution pictures but no zips. To make it worse, they don’t release pictures for all the scenes.
I’m still saying the site is worth a year join especially if you like group amateur sex. There’s no real story in the scenes. The regular scenes, especially the lesbian scenes, are really good. That’s no surprise either after you see the choices of men they have to pick from. The niches are covered well. Especially if you remember the 150 group scenes in casting.
Just to show that the models are sexy. My favorite redhead model Malorie Rose is on here. This one is funny since it’s one of the scenes that Duca left his sweat outfit on in, Max, a female dancer with some tattoos. She is really hot. They have several scenes of her. Pamela Kayne is another I really like.
I even wish they would make a package of Alt Erotica, AD4X and Purgatory X. Those are three of my favorite hardcore sites. Very much recommended if you like hardcore that’s not annoyingly hardcore and don’t mind trolls in hoodies in it. Looks like a damn garden gnome. Definite join. I don’t know if they do any lower promos than $14.95 or not but it’s still worth that to try it out.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of legendary photographer J. Stephen Hicks, who I mostly knew from Penthouse.
- You have to know what you’re getting into here, 1,737 videos and these are softcore videos. (Will go into in bottom line). The videos are downloadable and the newer ones have 4K.
- Nearly 4,000 photosets and those are downloadable with the resolution topping out at 3000 long end.
- Some of the prettiest models in the world. You probably could guess that with J. Stephen Hicks background.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Here’s the big news: It’s now included in Adult Prime. I talked about this network last month. This network is making some waves when you add one of the top glam/softcore sites.
- It is still updating, looks like 3-4 photosets per week and the videos are updating very slow. There were 3 in November. (I will go into that in the bottom line too)
- Seamless navigation, how did they pull that off?
Cons:
- It’s going to be too softcore for some.
- The videos even though there is masturbation are very short. Most are under 10 minutes. There’s no lesbian, there’s no male/female.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a big deal to see Digital Desire on a network that I was just talking about has been overlooked. I’ll say the seamless navigation. That could have been a big problem when adding a site like this to a network. What they have done, Digital Desire has its own navigation panel below the network’s navigation panel. When you search Digital Desire’s models it only shows you the models on Digital Desire. A lot of networks have a problem with running their navigation into a site’s navigation. Someone knows what they’re doing.
I think the videos on Digital Desire are underrated. These are not furious masturbation videos. These are women teasing, touching, dildos and masturbating in sexually provocative ways. That’s kind of up my alley, my alley isn’t downhill. I’m just going to pick a random one out that the screencap got my attention. It’s a pretty, blonde named Taylor. You know I picked randomly, or it wouldn’t have been a blonde. She is taking a shower and it turns into her noticing the shower head is hitting all the right places and she doesn’t lose control or start yelling or moaning loudly. It looks real. That is what I always believed was the strength behind this style of porn. You don’t have the model that’s screaming and letting you know they are on a porn set and not really in their at-home bathroom. Nearly all the videos on Digital Desire have this style to them. I don’t want to use the word erotic for some reason but that is what comes to mind. She just accidentally realized she was aroused and did something about it. I enjoy these videos more in 2021 than I did 10 years ago. It’s a nice change of pace from 2021 porn. I should mention outside of a few sites, I don’t think good, new porn has come around in the last decade. I know a lot of our members have similar taste as I have. You should check it out especially with the network it comes with.
The photosets are exactly what you would expect. It’s like looking through an extended penthouse or playboy explicit photo pictorial. It has that classy feel to it. No is going to be offended by anything on here. Unless you wanted to be there to watch. I even like that this network keeps a fairly universal style to their downloads no matter which site it’s on. Digital Desire’s videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and the newer videos have 4K. I think the ones below 480p is underkill/overkill. I know that those are made for mobile but aren’t most mobile devices 1080p resolution? I’m not the most up to date on cellphones. I do have an iPhone XS and it’s a little over 1080p. Those that know me and my obsessiveness, you know that I’m happy to just see 3-4 download options instead of 8-10.
The models on this site are probably well-known. I don’t know a lot of newer models. There are nearly 1,300 models. I see big names like Aaliyah Love, Abigail Mac, one of my favorites in Adrianna Luna. I will even add a few of the more classic models that you can get here. Aria Giovanni has 23 photosets and 8 videos. Kyla Cole has 48 photosets and 2 videos. Kyla was one of the earliest internet model sensations, really pretty woman and eyes, if you haven’t seen her. One of my all-time favorites, I had no idea she had content on here is Charmane Star with 17 photosets and 9 videos. One that only a few probably remember, the mindblowing, Veronica Zemanova with 24 photosets and 3 videos. This is easily a standalone site that has made it for years on its own and you now receive it with a full network.
The site is highly recommended for those of us that wonder what happened to our porn we remember? I found some! Very impressed with the integration into the network. As long as this network keeps going they have a very bright future.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Talk about a site that hits a homerun with the models and pairing of multiple females. Maybe the best casting I’ve seen.
- It has only 50 scenes and at least 45 of those are worth downloading.
- Scenery and settings in the scenes are almost as pretty as the models.
- For some reason I’m getting good download speeds on this site (80% of max).
- These are almost all threesomes or more scenes.
- Navigation is simple and easy to use.
Cons:
- That damn guy. Charles Dera. Out of all the good casting of the female pairings, why in the name of all things holy would you put him with Abigail Mac and Madelyn Monroe?
- It’s not updating but well worth the downloading of the scenes they have.
- Lots of promotion of their other sites that used to all be on one network.
Bottom Line:
*Score is a little high due to how many of my (subjective) favorite models are on this site.*
I’m having to work through the laughing about listing Charles Dera as a con. There was Lee Stone’s broke dick. There was Choky Ice’s personality of a chunk of ice and there’s Charles Dera’s flippy mohawk that I think is made from brick and it accidentally hit him in the face. Porn needs to hire a guy that can say, “That guy is going to ruin the scene. Keep his ugly ass out of the camera lens!”
But the pretty models really make this site. You have pairings of models like this: Vicki Chase and Eliza Ibarra or Valentina Nappi, Karma Rx and Athena Faris or Alina Lopez and Gia Milana and the one they tried to kill me with: Jade Kush and Ember Snow. I guess that’s why they can stick Charles Dera in those scenes. Let’s just work on getting him out of the camera. The models are as good on this site as any site I’ve been on. The only scam is Charles Dera. I don’t get the stories in these scenes.
The truth is the stories are really bad and you’re just here for the models on this site. This is one of those sites that you don’t care what the story is. There are real estate agents (the female models), they’re having sex with the supposed to be client looking to buy the house. The good part about that poor story is the houses and pools and scenery is very pretty, and a lot of the scenes have outdoors parts.
Of the 50 scenes: Three are solo scenes. The rest are at a minimum of threesome (m/f/f) and quite a few have more than 3 women in them. I’m guessing this site really interests me because of models that are in more than one scene. Cindy Starfall, who is one of my all-time favorites, very underrated models, is in 7 of the 50 scenes. She doesn’t have that many scenes on all sites combined. There are several Gina Valentina scenes. If those models are not a big deal to you, you might not like this site as much as I do. If you like curvy butts, one scene has Abella Danger and Zoe Monroe. I hope that it shows how important the models on this site are to my score and my overall positivity towards this site. If you don’t have a good story or something to hold the scene up, put several pretty models in it and that will work.
The scenes can all be downloaded in 240, 480, 720 and 1080. The pictures aren’t worth fooling with. You would be just well off to use a media player that takes screenshots. I will mention because I know she has her fans; Karma Rx has several scenes on here too and she performs really well in those. I have noticed her performances vary. The ones on here are some of her best work. I think she works better with another female and male. It’s like it brings her competitive side to outperform the other female. The scenes are also long, most are over 30 minutes. This, to me, is one of those hidden treasure sites. The three solo scenes, even though I like solo porn, are nothing special. The other 47 are good. It’s a site that I would recommend and join (once) even if it was just a standalone site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
