Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of content, upwards of 3,000 picture sets and 1,000 videos
- Many known pornstars before they were stars, many amateurs that I wish went on to a career in porn as well.
- Though quality on picture sets does vary, all sets are available in zips
- Exclusive content
- New site design from when I was a member a few months ago, download speeds have increased for me.
- Great TBP price of $14.95
Cons:
- Video quality could be improved, but I like this site for the exclusive pictures moreso than the videos.
- Picture quality could be better, but it is advertised as amateur site, so it isn't that bad.
- Not a lot of hardcore
- Older sets have a quality dropoff from new sets
Bottom Line:
Matt's Models reminds me a lot of the ATK sites. If you're here just for the videos, you probably won't like it as much. One of my favorite parts of the site is the "before they were stars" content. My original reason for joining was to get some really great older content of Eva Angelina, pre-implants, with glasses too. Just a few other recognizable models are Erica Campbell, Shay Laren and a personal favorite Addisson Rose.
Looking through the more amateur models that have yet to go pro, or for that matter, may never go pro, adds value to the site since some of these girls haven't been seen before. Cassandra Colegra is another favorite here, she has her own site now, but isn't as well known as most pro models.
Picture quality can throw you off some. I've downloaded different sets from different years and overall, I would call the resolution average just above average for the entire site. The newer sets are better, as expected. The videos I have downloaded are around 500 on the high end of the resolution scale, downloadable in full scenes, which is a plus over the aforementioned ATK sites.
Overall, this isn't a site that I would tell a new porn customer to check out. I get a lot out of this site, because they have plenty of material from some of my favorites, but it still isn't a site to introduce someone to online porn with. On the other hand, if you've never tried Matt's, I would give it a recommendation, especially with the $14.95 price. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 46 Sites included in this big network
- If you like extreme hardcore, this is about as extreme as it gets.
- Some of the sites have up to 640 high end on their videos
- The sites with pictures do have zip downloads
- Good download speeds
Cons:
- Only found 4 of the sites to be interesting.
- Price is too high, there are other networks with similar content with better quality for lower prices
- Most of the sites were on the small side, I think they could easily group some of these together.
- Some of the sites videos are below 400 on high end, come on people, it is 2008, 640 just about has to be considered the happy medium
- Even the sites that had a theme that I was interested in, didn't really live up to that theme
Bottom Line:
This was one of those joins that I wasn't for sure about, but I saw where they had some Sativa Rose content and a few others that I like so I will take the one month plunge.
Most of these sites on this network just scream, "generic" content. They have several blowjob sites, and I will never understand why they need more than one site, just put them all on one. I am starting to think networks do this, not just to be able to advertise a higher number of sites than their competition, but also thinking that most people won't fool with visiting the 6 different blowjob sites.
The quality at best is average on the videos. Most of the sites best quality videos are 445 high end, a few do have 640 high end. Having picture zips is always a nice feature, but all of the sites don't have pictures and the pictures aren't high resolution.
The overly violent content will definitely make some not even consider, so let me add that while I have seen worse in porn, the violence level here is pretty high if you are offended easily. You get a lot of throat gagging.
I'm not really into the models who have pounds of make-up on, especially when their eye shadow ends up smeared from being choked.
Best sites, the POV ones are pretty good, Catfight Gangbang is pretty good, Hellfire Sex is pretty good if you are into goth looks and Tease it Out is pretty good. I didn't keep anything from the other sites. Overall, I can't recommend it unless you like extreme very hardcore sex.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 22 sites, my picks are Teen Brazil, College Fuck Fest, Bikini Banger, Border Banger and Yank My Crank
- Great humor in many of the clips, including a hilarious Speedy Gonzalez reference in Border Bangers, "Arriba, Andale!"
- Video quality is above 640 in most cases which is impressive for a network of 22 sites.
- I think it is mostly exclusive, I don't recognize the material
- Most of the sites update a few times per week
Cons:
- Humor in porn can be a bad thing at times.
- Very few pictures, and the ones that are there are poor quality.
- I'm not into anal, so several of the sites are of no use to me, also a tranny site that is of no use.
- Two of the best sites for me, Teen Brazil and Border Bangers need more content!
Bottom Line:
My love of Brazilian women pulled me to this site after seeing Apoctom's review of it. The Brazil Teen site was enough for me, but Border Bangers also had some good clips as did Bikini Banger, Yank My Crank and College Fuck Fest.
The network reminds me of Ox Pass. The humor in the sites was worth 3 points in my review, so if you don't like humor in your porn, knock off 3 points. I couldn't help but laugh when on a Boarder Banger video, the guy tells the girl, "This is how they came up with the idea of putting a burrito inside a taco" that is good humor. I will take the humor over spitting in the model's faces or grabbing their throats anyday.
I was happily surprised at the video quality for a network. I actually let my bill recur since I had been out of town the last week. I wanted to explore the other sites more in-depth. I downloaded all material in Brazil Teen and Border Bangers and will be keeping all of it, it has been nothing but quality in those videos.
I guess the lack of decent pictures is a knock. Also useless sites for me, but I don't knock much off for those since I know some people like anal sites. Overall, it is a very good network, I think they could lower the price a little, maybe $5 to $10 off. I would recommend it based just on the five sites I listed in pros, as the content I have gotten from those sites is above average quality. Plus, they do update which some networks rarely do. Definitely recommend for Brazilian fans!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Call it Met-Art goes to the produce section, or Met-Art with working anatomy or Met-Art gets the finger, it's Met-Art solo, maybe the X is misleading to some.
- Met-Art models masturbating, that alone is 2-3 pros.
- The same Met-Art quality we've come to expect, numbers will be in the bottom line.
- Very good download speeds, just over 80% of my max download speed.
- Navigation is good, easy to use and from what I can tell is accurate.
- Photos, as expected, are still a strong focus even with the masturbation videos and are downloadable.
- Something I haven't said too much in recent reviews, it's not likely you'll find a model that's unattractive.
Cons:
- It's hard to list cons on Met-Art because they are always trying, always improving something, but the sign-up page nearly got me on a cross-sale because the programming was off and had it crumpled up in the middle of my screen (right where you type your username in registration). Remove the cross-sale and that can't be a problem.
- Ads from cam models, I think they're free for Met-Art members but I'm afraid the majority of us have been tricked way too many times by those on OTHER sites, not Met-Art ones and got charged for clicking on them. Either way, everything would look cleaner without them or with them at the bottom of the pages.
Bottom Line:
For years, I've joined Met-Art and thought, "All it needs is a little more personality." Then, they brought out Sex Art and I thought, "Okay, not that much personality! Those new personalities have dicks." Then, I joined Met-Art X and said, "This is what I've been looking for!" I don't like to say any model or models are too pretty or too innocent for hardcore sex but it's how Sex Art makes me feel at times. No offense is meant, nor am I dropping a competitor's name for any other reason than to say the Sex Art content reminds me a lot of Nubiles.net's content which my review of it shows I complained about the models not looking comfortable in hardcore sets.
But Met-Art X is more personal, I've always joked about the solo genre needing to be a collection of short stories, like a girl and her finger, a girl and her 11 inch cucumber. It's to my surprise, better than I expected but it's hard for this type of site to be perfect. As one of the biggest solo fans on PU, even I eventually get bored with solo porn. I do think in the case of Met-Art X it's more about the models becoming comfortable with masturbating for the camera. I've said it before, I can watch 1-2 minutes of a solo video and tell you if I'm going to like it. The model's body language, her expressions and her sounds, words, moans.
I've never found a model that mastered the solo scene like Eve Angel did, especially later in her career but there are some here that have a lot of potential.
For sake of giving credit where it's due, one model on here has me looking for more, Elena Koshka. Her scene "Indulge" is one of the most erotic masturbation scenes I've seen and her eye contact with the camera is ... Eve Angel-level. One of the most genuine aspects you see with these younger models is when their eye-contact breaks from the camera, not because they're shy but because they hit the right spot and close their eyes.
There are others but I think hers stand out as my current favorites on the site.
The site isn't huge like Met-Art but it's growing. There is one update per day and it alternates from video to photo set each day, for a month you'll get around 15 videos, 15 photo sets.
The video quality does vary but only on the 4K option. I don't know if there's a pattern but the videos with 4K option aren't that common, maybe 2 per month. I tried making the jump to 4K back on Black Friday but ended up returning the monitor/television and going back to 1080p, so the 4K isn't a selling point for me either way. All of the videos have 1080p option, as well as 720p, 360p and 270p options. The videos are crisp and clear with excellent sound, something they've taken from their sister site Sex Art.
The photo sets are some of the best you will find and they also do something I'm partial to, some of the sets even start with the model fully clothed. The photos are downloadable in high, medium and low qualities. The newest high quality photos are 4200 long end and there is a mixture of portrait and landscape photos in each set. The photo sets are also a good size in amount of photos with most having 100+ photos in them.
As of 2/3/2019: There are 211 models. There are 631 videos and 438 photo sets. See how nice good navigation is? I didn't have to estimate on any of those.
For me, this is a near perfect site just because even when I get bored with solo porn, I always come back to it. There's also a nice blend of model types, though I would like to see a few more "exotic" looking models. The blend is in body types. You're not going to find any models here that fit in a 40 inch ass category or huge boobs category but some of the models are definitely curvier than others, which isn't real common on the artsier sites. The curvier ones look like they were or are athletic young women with fit builds, instead of slender.
The masturbation isn't ever too extreme or even rough, a lot of it looks like genuine 1-2 fingers masturbation. There are some fruits and vegetables and toys in some scenes but I prefer the finger ones.
The numbers also tell us that most of the models have more than one video or one photo set. I'm going to have to join Met-Art (been awhile) to see how many of these models have sets on it that are tamer and that in and of itself, will make these Met-Art X scenes even better to me.
There's not much to change. I would have every scene start with the clothed model but there are exceptions. One of my favorite photo sets on the site is Barbara Vie "Just Like 90s" with her slinky top and panties on in the shower. So, she's not fully dressed but the clothes make it even better even if they're only on for 5-6 photos.
It's a site I like a lot and probably would score it even higher but this was my very first join of it. I have to give it some room to move up and continue to impress me. Recommended for those that like or love solo models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model.
Cons:
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell.
Bottom Line:
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My new favorite of the picture heavy sites, TBP price of $19.95 is a bargain, as is the year deal of $99.99.
- 4 updates per day
- There could be bigger, but the biggest resolution I'm seeing right now is 3744x5616, all sets are zipped.
- Amount of content is overwhelming, more than I have been able to go through in 3 months.
- After much thought, I consider the lack of many movies a pro. The movies they do have rarely compare to the photo sets.
- Movies are high quality technically and come in DIVX, QT H264, IPOD, WMV and MPEG.
- Navigation is pretty simple to use considering the amount of content.
- DL speed uses about 98% of my max speed
Cons:
- Movies to me are not worth downloading, and if they didn't post them, I wouldn't complain.
- Hard to believe, but some of the g/g sets to me take away from the solo sets.
- If you like anything that has to do with penetration, even solo, this isn't the site for you and wasn't for me a few years ago.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first reviewed Met-Art, I gave it an 80. I felt at that time, I was being nice with that score. If nothing else, the 80 was my way of saying at least everything is high quality and they update consistently.
Things have changed, I hadn't been a member in a year. I joined again and it was like a whole new world opened up to my perverted eyes. There still are sets that I find annoying, poses for example, but I'm finding much more to like now than I did two years ago.
The models range from typical slim models to average weight and bust. There aren't many Daisy DDDD cups here.
I think my change in how I look at this site came about when on a forum of a well-known Euro photographer, I read a post by him that said his sets when viewed told a story and that "some people don't get that story". I looked at Met-Art's sets that way and now will be joining for a year as soon as my monthly subscription runs out.
The resolution size of the pictures is huge. Those high 4000s images are almost like looking at a map! You scroll sideways or up and down and those are really amazing to look at in that much detail.
It probably didn't hurt that I developed myself a crush on Lidiya A and probably 30 other models. Including some of my longtime favorites like Zafira, Eve, Aneta.
My cons for this site are limited to things that I think could/would be cons to others. The videos are photoshoots or biographies/interviews. These are also quite large files. I downloaded one a few days ago that was 500 MB+, and it was nothing more than videoing the photoshoot. I also think the g/g sets are not near as good as the solo sets, though I haven't seen them all.
I am seeing more variety in their models than I had noticed in my earlier review and that helps me add the points to this re-review.
The search feature can be a hassle, at least for me, I'm not real specific in my searches, so I end up with hundreds of results, that is probably more my fault, but I don't know any of the set filenames, so how would I know what to search for using that function? In time, I would guess the search will be more functional for me as I get used to the site and its filenaming.
The locations are usually only second to the models in beauty also. I did run into a few blurry pictures here and there, but I'm not really complaining.
I had thought about sending their webmaster an email to ask a question, but haven't yet, so I don't know how their customer service is. To give an example of how much content there is, my question was going to ask who the model is in the thumbnail over "Your Profile", she is brunette, white lacy top opened to the middle and looks to be a matching skirt. I thought it was Zafira, but it isn't. So, I'm stuck looking through every model's page at the covers, hoping to find out who she is.
To me, that is a credit to how large the site is and how much content they have, add the very high quality and I have a new favorite photo site, recommended!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month!
- Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end.
- Videos are now HD quality 1280x720
- Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99
- Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else
Cons:
- Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases.
- As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking.
- You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs
- With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more!
One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli.
I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased.
Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Reality Kings network, one of the best, if not best standalone sites offered on a network.
- Lots of content, as of 7/23/09 there is a total of 367 scenes with weekly updates.
- Mostly Euro models, including at least one set of nearly all of the major Euro stars. Also, there is a lot of b/g hardcore here including with some Euros that rarely do b/g. BL will go into that.
- Last 3 years quality has been pretty good, videos at 720x480 with 1400 bitrate, quality 3 years or older is 352x240 and cut into smaller parts.
- Pictures available, screenshots, zipped for easy download and some of these are huge, as many as 600 photos in one set.
- Site averages out to less than $1 a month when included with Reality Kings TBP price.
- Some of the better known models have multiple sets.
- Well above average download speeds
Cons:
- To start with, this site has two flaws for me. One is the navigation. Not that it is hard to navigate. You can search all updates on the site and start scrolling. There are 50 updates per page and some of the thumbnails don't even show the model's face. This leads to clicking every set, hitting back button and starting over.
- The other is the quality of the older content. The updates from 3 years ago and back have the videos split into at least 3 parts and are of poor quality 352 high end. As with most sites that feature Euro models, that older content is usually the best.
Bottom Line:
I rarely will single out a network site for a full review, but I think Mike's Apartment is worthy of it.
The site is a reality site that wants you to believe these unsuspecting Euro models are looking for an apartment to stay in. You know what happens next, "But...I have no how do you say...money?" The best part for me is the way the Euro models show that they don't take their acting very seriously as they often start laughing. I've wondered about a lot of the b/g sets that say the guy with the model is her husband or boyfriend that also needs some place to stay.
This is true in at least a couple of the videos. Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa's real-life husband, John Cruz is with her on this site in a hardcore set and I believe a couple of the newer ones are with their real boyfriends. You know what that means, don't you? Very realistic and passionate sex.
Just a brief sampling of the top Euros that have been on this site: Eve Angel (2), Simony Diamond, Eufrat, Stracy Stone/Bijou (2), Cindy Hope (2), Wivien/Vivien, Sophie Moone, Angel Dark, Veronika Simon, Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa (2), Zafira (2), Bambi, just to name the ones I have downloaded recently.
Here is the big part for me, Eufrat, Stracy, Zafira don't have much b/g on the internet, but they do b/g on Mike's Apartment. Also, some of these Euros end up on the other sites in the network as well. Cindy Hope has a recent scene on another RK site We Live Together.
They also do get the girls to talk a little in English. Eve Angel's first appearance on the site was in February 2004, that was pretty early in Eve's career. You can't help but laugh in a good way when she admits in English, "A deedo" (dildo) that she brought with her would be the only lucky thing that day.
The download limit that is often talked about rarely becomes a problem if you break the sites into download sessions and download to site named folders. I downloaded 17 full videos and 17 zipped screenshot sets last night for a total of 6.1 GB, well below the 10 GB daily limit. So, don't let that limit push you away. Plus, if you do hit it, they won't cancel your membership. They just tell you to come back in 24 hours.
The content on Mike's Apartment is some of the most collectible for Euro fans on the internet, especially with the rare b/g content. For me, if I had never been a member, I would pay the TBP price just for this site. One annoyance is that Mike couldn't keep his mouth shut early in the site's life. He would ask some of the dumbest questions ever asked in porno, "Do you play video games?" Mike then starts having a conversation with the cameraman about Family Guy! In his defense, Mike does grovel to the models probably the same way we would! "Oh my god, look at these perfect boobs" If the older content was remastered this site would rate in the low to mid 90s.
In closing, this is the site that makes Reality Kings my favorite network. Also remember, if the content wasn't good, the DL limit wouldn't bother anyone!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that still is trying to reach its potential but is held back by poor management.
- They used to advertise 100% amateurs which wasn't true and while I don't recognize many of the newer models, I can't verify they are amateurs. I can say their shooting style makes you think the models are amateurs. It's not a putdown. They don't pile makeup on the models, a lot of sets have selfie-style pictures and the girls come off as normal girls not pornstars.
- 14 sites that have a niche they cover from lesbian, to bisexual girls sharing their boyfriend to the almost amateur I Know That Girl to public/outdoors. Good production values throughout.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Excellent picture sets that are downloadable and 2000 long end.
- Network as a whole averages over 1 update per day.
- Also, like the models mostly bringing an amateur feel, the settings, everything that goes into the scenes feels like everyday life instead of a porn shoot.
Cons:
- The important one. You have to pay $9.95 for VIP access or else the membership is the same as a limited trial membership. With the standard $19.95 membership you can look at any set and stream the videos but no downloads and maybe the funniest, you get VIP customer support when you pay the extra. As much as I wanted to drop a 58 on them, I don't plan on returning and I would think if a person likes their content enough they won't mind paying the extra $9.95. I do think they should lower their standard price to $9.95 if they're going to require you to pay again for downloads. I took 5 points off the score but could see it being a dealbreaker for some.
- As with any of the American-based networks there's a bunch of goofs talking in a lot of the scenes.
- Pro-Biller, cross-sales
Bottom Line:
Mofos has been one of my favorite networks for years. I like their style a little better than Reality Kings, Bang Bros, Brazzers, they create more of a reality feel than those sites and the models are some of the prettiest in the world.
Here's what you get with the $9.95 VIP upgrade: Access to over 2,000 Teen Pink videos, the ability to download all of Mofos content, VIP customer service, access to the Mofos Vault and some kind of stamp on your screenname if you post a comment.
I think it's worth it at least in my case. My entire Mofos collection was wiped out about 3 years ago. They have two public/exhibitionist scenes of Jynx Maze that I would pay $30 for. I do think it prices itself out of the recommend for anyone recommendation. For collectors who have a few favorite models it's easily worth it.
What Mofos does is take tried and proven methods of everyday girls (selfies, mirror pictures, etc) and has the model do things like those. It can at least help your brain get into fantasy mode. They also offer niches that aren't that common anymore. The sites you get with your membership are:
* = still updating.
Video Blog (130 scenes) - It's kind of like interviews except the models get nude and some play with themselves.
Mofos Live (14 scenes) - As with other networks, a great idea that they stopped doing.
She's a Freak (387 scenes) - Fisting, weird insertions, etc...
B-Sides (66 scenes) - Little bit of everything including some public. Stranded Teens* (156 scenes) - Hitchhiker porn, kind of a car take on Bang Bus, most scenes are in the cars, some spill out into the streets. Real Slut Party - (256 scenes) - Multiple women having sex with multiple men and each other. Latina Sex Tapes* (292 scenes) - One of the few updating Latina "amateur" sites, only does one update per month but the scenes are good.
Let's Try Anal* (293 scenes) - Self-explanatory. Public Pickups* (296 scenes) - Public sex similar to most, guy offers money, girl gets naked in the grass or on the concrete.
Pervs on Patrol* (421 scenes) - Spying, peeking, turns to sex, fun site.
I Know that Girl* (452 scenes) - The flagship site that brought their earliest attention. Teens, early 20s models, tease, take selfies, then have sex.
Don't Break Me* (87 scenes) - Tiny women.
Share My BF* (47 scenes) - Bisexual girls having sex with a guy.
Ebony Sex Tapes* (24 scenes) - Newer site that shows tons of potential, very pretty and sexy black girls.
Girls Gone Pink* (14 scenes) - Lesbian sex.
Mofos Lab* (2 scenes) - Brand new site that might have the most potential, there's some public in it, some light BDSM, some POV, looks like they're going for the multiple-genre.
Maybe you can see why Mofos stands out? It's a network that actually has more sites updating than not updating. They also are adding those newer sites that fill in the niches well.
In some ways, I could almost justify paying the full price just because there's a lot of new content and varied genres being covered. Here's the numbers:
2,980 scenes across the basic network access with a total of 3,500 if you pay the extra for VIP and you also get a bonus 5,000 non-exclusive scenes with VIP too. All of the Mofos content is exclusive.
For the rest of the bad since it's looking like this network could have made a run at a 100. Pro-biller is their billing agent. I have learned to deal with their practices but they're actually worse here. You get the typical stupid one when signing up that nearly duplicates the site's name like this: Yes, I want access to MofosPlus for $2, no, I don't want this great deal. After you've made it through that one, instead of going to Mofos homepage, you land on a special offers page and it has one trial checked, you have to submit beyond the page or else it won't move forward. Just uncheck the one and make sure not to check the other 3. Yes, 4 cross-sales. Once on the site you can upgrade to VIP and unlock the above listed bonuses including downloading access and they have another "upgrade" that gives you access to more sites. I'm honestly afraid to click it!
It's a shame. This could be one of the strongest networks in porn. It has a clean interface, navigation is excellent, models are all well-above average. The picture sets come with all scenes and are photo shoot style not screencaps. Usually includes 15-30 pictures of the model in her regular clothes, bending over, etc
They do a good job at updates, keeping their sites alive, I Know that Girl has been around since 2009. The large amount of public content also helps a lot with me. It wants to be the network that someone says, "That's how you do a network!" but frustrating business practices stops that. I recommend but only if you do the VIP upgrade.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is owned by the same company that owns Brazzers, with more amateur level models and not as many fake boobs.
- Video technical quality is top of the line. From the best I can tell, unless there are some old videos I haven't seen, every video I've downloaded has had a 1080p option.
- Every set has photo and screenshots options with zip downloads. The older pictures are only 1300 long end, but the majority are 2000 long end or higher.
- Prefer the model selection here over any of the other networks. All races of models covered nicely which is rare in networks these days.
- Not quite as much silliness or goofiness that other networks have.
- Navigation is good except for one big con listed below in cons.
- Besides the sites that come with the network, there are 32 bonus sites, these include one Brazzers site, A Day with a Pornstar, ZZ Insider, Spunk Network and the rest looks to be licensed DVDs, includes most niches, including BBW, so they're digging deep.
Cons:
- Not a lot of cons, but if one stands out the most it is the lack of a model search by name. Instead, you get the options of 18-25, Europeans, and so on, but no direct model search. What this amounts to is scanning through until you find a model you're looking for, clicking her name, then marking her as a favorite to go back to and download.
- This is more of an annoyance con, when you click on a site from the main network page, you get a full page ad that you have to close to get to the site.
- Sort of a pro/con both, quite a few ads, but some are really good deals.
Bottom Line:
After Brazzers impressed me with their improvements on their network I decided to take a shot at this smaller network they also own or manage.
I'm glad I did. The best way for me to describe this network is to say this is what Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros were before they ended up with so much content that they are overwhelming and have older lesser quality content. Everything here is high quality, 1080p option, though I honestly don't download those highest quality videos because the file sizes near 3 GB each.
The video options on the newest videos are mp4, wmv 1080p, wmv 720p and those three also have SD versions for those that don't want to download files that range from 1-3 GB each. Most of the SD ones are 500-800 MB each and look very good. The picture sets are huge. The ones I have downloaded go in excess of 200 pictures each with a 2000 long end on the resolution.
The only option I've seen missing on the older videos is the mp4 option.
Also what I think has been done on this network is someone is listening to the complaints on the other networks. The sites on here all go into niches, instead of trying to be a reality niche with the same theme from site to site. There's a solo site, an "amateur" site though these are mostly new(er) pornstars, there is a party site with group sex, an exhibitionist/voyeur type site, an interracial site, a worldwide model site, some "classic" scenes, one "reality" themed of "at work" and two other group competition sites.
This creates a very nice balance. The cons, that model search function really needs to be added. I have to think Emy Reyes is on here somewhere, but I'm still scrolling through the sites trying to find her. If there is a model search, would appreciate someone pointing me to it.
Since I've been a member, they average more than 1 update per day with some days getting two. Maybe less is better? Quality over quantity? The ads will annoy you at first especially the splash screen when you click on a site to go to, but maybe I'm just imagining this, but they seem to be less and less the further I get into the membership. Maybe it's the first time you visit a site?
It also has that toolbar/sidebar thing that a lot of sites are going to. I don't use it. It has links for the 32 bonus sites, your account, etc...
At the top you have a link for your favorites. It's a nice site design, not cluttered at all. At first, I didn't think I was going to go this high with the score, because it's not as big as most networks, but with the content they have being high quality, I think it offsets the lower number of content. On the confusion with how much content is on here, I'm guessing the higher number includes the bonus sites. There still is a lot of content here and considering the high technical quality of them, plus me preferring these models as a whole, it's better than the majority of networks to me.
Highly recommended, you'll probably be as surprised as I was.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Reality Kings network and the biggest reason I return.
- A fairly popular niche these days and Reality Kings seem to put more production values in these scenes than any of their others.
- Good download speeds, about 80% of my max.
- Updates twice per month, could be more frequent, but it's not bad.
- 1080p option on all 122 scenes.
- Taking us back to these days of requiring some imagination.
Cons:
- As with the niche sites on networks, it will probably end sooner than later.
- If you're in it for the acting ability, you're going to be disappointed.
- Scenarios want to become boring
Bottom Line:
This is a fairly simple site on Reality Kings. There's not a whole lot of difference from scene to scene, but it's some of best porn being shot these days.
The premise is stepmom/aunt/stepsister catches younger sister/stepdaughter having sex with a man and joins in. These scenes are not believable. There's one where the stepmom is using the toilet while the stepdaughter is having sex in the shower, in the same room. But if you use your imagination some and enjoy voyeurism, there are some very good scenes.
A lot of what I like are the scenes where the stepmother doesn't just "stumble" up and catch them having sex. It's more like she's watching them before joining in. That's enjoyable to me. I like seeing the older models masturbating while watching. On top of that, the models on this site are almost always top-tier models.
While the two updates per month could be higher, it's better than none and each scene has pictures and videos. I once talked about the value of porn being to me, how many scenes do I keep from a site. As of today, 5/16/2017, I have every scene from this site stored on my hard drive and don't intend to delete any of them. I know that each of the other big American networks also have sites similar to this one, but Reality Kings, is adding more with their range of models.
Also helps to keep a sense of humor when watching these. You're going to see some flashbacks to 90s porn when models made over-expressive faces to help build the story, even though the over-expressiveness is what started hurting porn in the 90s. Kind of strange even. Seems like it was Reality Kings and a few others that first brought "reality porn" into the mainstream to be more believable, but now they're returning to the very style of porn they pushed out.
I would join just this site which adds a lot of value when you add the network in with. Would recommend it to anyone who likes MILF porn, voyeurism or misses 90s porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A pretty good site in a niche I like.
- The acting is so bad it’s good and makes the scenes enjoyable. This niche and all stepfamily, mom, sites need to take notes.
- Pretty women and the better scenes give you more than one woman. Mom shows daughter how to suck a dick. Who needs acting?
- Photosets and videos are downloadable, and the quality is very high (see bottom line).
- It has 162 scenes. It updates once per month. I can’t complain, two of the four newest updates have Vina Sky in them. It took acting ability to get that guy to have sex with the other woman.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max)
Cons:
- I think this niche tells on itself. It started as moms teach sex and now it’s up to my stepmom is seducing me. The niche has become so common it’s standard.
- I don’t know why there isn’t expansion on these themes. Grandparents, aunts and uncles, BBQs, family reunions. Think of the exhibitionism fans. Twenty people outdoor orgies while eating BBQ and have someone telling a really boring story. That would sell. People could relate to it.
Bottom Line:
This is part of the Nubiles Porn network. I have been a Nubiles fan for pretty much as long as I have been reviewing. They go through their ups and downs. They are very close to reaching a level of consistency that could be a bad thing. I’m really impressed with Lauren Phillips new scene on this site. These sites need to have her in more of these older woman scenes. She is not only attractive, she’s very believable in how horny she is. Be sure to check that scene out, it’s called, “Keeping My Stepson Up Until Midnight”. She reminds me of Ginger from Gilligan’s Island. And anything with Vina Sky in it is worth watching. Not only a treat to the eye, she’s very entertaining to watch.
That is always going to be the needed focus of this niche. This is entertainment not reality television. Get the pretty women, give it a few bad acting parts and let the women show their bodies off. That’s porn. Nubiles does it well. I won’t say it’s the best I’ve seen. The best I’ve seen was Eve Angel in 2008.
These scenes are standard porn. Though I have to say Vina’s look on her face in the preview of “Stepdaughter Shares With Mom” is really good. She nails that “I’m surprised” face. You have to think that takes a lot of acting ability. Naked woman bent over. Guy behind her. You have to act to convince me you didn’t know what was going to happen. Vina’s face shows it. It says, “I can’t believe you’re doing that!” She knows there’s a camera there. Everything pointed to “this is a porn scene” but she makes her surprised face genuine.
This site just like any other site by Nubiles has very good technical quality. The newer videos have up to 4K downloads, I do believe that’s unlimited. I don’t download a lot, anymore unless Vina Sky is in it. I am going to start looking for more of this Lauren Philipps. Nubiles never fully strayed from their roots. They are still giving importance to photos. That’s a big deal to me. They have real photosets and they also have screencaps. You can download them. The newer photosets are 6720x4480. I would be advertising that. Pictures will always have their fans. It’s how we made it here to internet porn. They do a good job of capturing the models without a dick in their mouth. Several of Vina’s are cute. She needs to be photographed more.
The update schedule isn’t that bad considering 3 of the 4 newest updates included Vina in 2 and Lauren Philipps in 1. They’re at least making their updates count. It’s one of those sites that if you’re looking for something realistic and believable, you probably are looking at the wrong genre of film. Porn has proved for 60 years that anyone can be an actress. That is why I support the making the scenes silly. These models have shown they can’t make believable scenes. Let them have fun. Nubiles is close to doing that with this site. It’s a good site on a better network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite niches. This is the older/younger I prefer.
- High quality from being connected to the Nubiles group.
- Unlimited downloading of picture sets and videos.
- CCBill is the biller
- Download speeds are very good (80% and up of my max).
- Semi-believable stories but the acting usually ruins it.
- Good sized site that looks like Coronavirus has halted updates.
Cons:
-The downside of being part of a network, the search shows you models from all the sites instead of just showing you the models from the site you’re on.
- The acting. It really fits more in the “ugly” category but I will let it by as a con.
- Too much promotion of their other sites. Nubiles wasn’t like this a few years ago.
Bottom Line:
We have all been there, right? We were sneaking around and having sex with our girlfriend when we were teenagers or 20. Then her mom walked in and caught us. The mom instead of yelling at the dad or making us go to the living room and sit apart from each other, started stripping and joined in. I had the one where the mom yelled at the dad and the one where the mom made us go sit in the living room apart from each other. Maybe it’s why I like this niche? This is one of the most common fantasies for men to have. It’s where we get our first taste of masturbating to a taboo fantasy. Mine were sisters. My girlfriends’ moms weren’t very attractive.
Nubiles does some of these taboo sites pretty good but I usually prefer the Team Skeet versions. Nubiles does the most vanilla versions of these taboo sites. I still don’t know what is taboo about a stepmom having sex with her stepson or a stepbrother having sex with his stepsister.
The site is large enough with 130 scenes. The videos can be downloaded in a long list of options. They have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p and 270p. The older videos have even more options. The photosets give this site a good lift. They can be downloaded in 3 sizes, 5400x3600, 2000x1333 and 1200x800. They are known for their photography and you can see it in these sets.
You have to approach this site with a sense of humor or you will be very disappointed in the acting. The stepmom walks into the kitchen to see her stepson jumping around behind the counter with his dick pulled out. He then follows her to her room and watches her get naked. Which she just happened to be doing that one time he looked in on her. The funniest one is of Tallie Lorain masturbating while having phone sex with her boyfriend. She hears a strange noise and goes to her adopted brother’s room. This is where your sense of humor needs to show up. She notices her adopted brother has his shirt off and something is sticking up from under the sheet. She pulls the sheet back. I can think of 4 other ways to write that better than that. What she finds is her adopted brother has his dick stuck in a vacuum cleaner. Tallie runs to their mom played by Cory Chase to get her to help him. Cory nearly immediately unbuttons her shirt, sits down on his bed and wants to check to see if his dick is okay. Seconds later, she’s stroking it. The adoptive mom and adoptive sister then take turns with him to make sure his dick isn’t injured. It’s a good scene but if you have one ounce of skepticism in you, it could be a little too unbelievable. That can ruin these types of scenes.
The models are all pretty. I am close to sure they are all pro models. I find the moms more attractive than the daughters.
Up until August of this year they were updating twice a month but had 0 updates in September. I am going to give them a pass on point reduction since most sites are seeming to run out of new content to post. It does make me wonder since they keep advertising their 3 new sites including Girls Who Lie. You get a lot with this site and I’m going to throw this in since it’s easy to miss.
When you join Nubiles Porn they show you 16 sites you have access to but if you don’t know, you could easily miss Nubiles.net. They do not show it as included but it is. If you go to the site and enter your login you will be signed in. Also, a longtime favorite from many years ago, Katrina18, you have to go directly to her site and use your login from Nubiles Porn to enter it. Katrina is a cute, bubbly, solo model who is heavy on the tease. I didn’t even know the site was still around until I saw it listed on TBP.
Overall, this is a good site and the whole package is very good. The taboo family sites are still dominating most of their new content including sites like, “My Family Pies”, “Family Swap” and “Step-Siblings Caught”. Of the newest 6 scenes, 5 are family taboo. If you’re into that niche they have a lot of it here.
This site itself is maybe an 82-83 mostly because of the high quality, unlimited downloads. A good site to join if you have a stepsister. Give her a peek at this site and maybe you’ll get lucky too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This old, small network used to be a diamond in the rough for fetishists even though the content doesn’t look like it.
- The old content is still on the network. Anything else said will make this not a pro.
- Some videos have 1080p, nothing higher and most are lower but are downloadable and unlimited.
- With a name like Monster Pimps one isn’t likely to assume pictures are the main focus but pictures are. With five times as many downloadable photosets as videos this is a photocentric network.
- Download speeds are good (75% my max).
- Do we give points for making me feel nostalgic?
Cons:
- Oh boy, just go look at it. It looks like a site from 2002 that I once used dial-up internet to access. Which is probably why it was more photos than videos.
- The price. I accept that a site has seen its better days. Hell, its better decade. The price is still $29.95. The positive is they use Epoch.
- Being a fetishist continues to become more difficult. It’s why (and the only reason) you would consider this network.
Bottom Line:
I joined Monster Pimps somewhere around 2005, maybe 2006, maybe 2008. It fit that era of porn. There was Lightspeed University as example. This network covered five of my favorite niches or fetishes. Those are: Panty Jobs – Not to be confused with the Evil Angel series, Panty Pops, which is what Panty Pops is. Panty Jobs was probably the first site to ever combine tease with handjob and teasing panties with sex. The premise is simple. The female, usually very young and cute, gets the man aroused and sits on his lap in her panties or a pulled up skirt. She slides his dick into her panties and grinds and uses sexual motions and groans. One of my all-time favorite niches. One of the sexiest niches.
Exploited Secretaries – Who doesn’t like secretary, office clothes, teacher porn? This is the fetish for young straight men. It could have been a teacher. It could have been a school nurse or secretary. Even if you’re older, it could have been that sweet temporary receptionist you hired. It’s just a good all-around niche. There’s not a lot that can go wrong with it.
Lipstick BJ – This wasn’t one I had a lot of interest in. I really didn’t like lipstick BJs. It’s not easy to explain how you got rose-colored lips on your underwear. This was the really reaching niche of the network. It even reminds me of smoking fetish. I’m sure there are people that like seeing a blowjob with the performing woman having on bright lipstick. What is important with this site’s inclusion is you can see how heavy this network was on fetish. They were basing entire sites on one niche. That also is a problem on this network. Similar to handjob porn that never does anything except handjob. It’s the same thing scene after scene. It never changed on this site.
Cheer Girls – Ding, ding, ding, the forever winner in teen porn, cheerleaders! I never liked cheerleaders. I was a jock. I still didn’t like them but in porn, yeah, I liked them. Those cheer outfits fit so many fetishes. Upskirts, panties, hose, bouncing boobs and I will say the cheerleading outfit may have been the first outfit that made me realize some women look better in clothes than naked. The site and fetish, to me, had no expiration date. This fetish should be a winner in porn at all times. Even with that said, there was one more fetish that topped all for me.
Sport Babes – Could you have made a more perfect network for me? This is a site featuring real, sporty, girls. They tease, they get naked, there’s some masturbation, some lesbian activity and it was the cherry on top of this once expected to be great network.
That was a sigh you heard. There are maybe some updates. I don’t think so. I don’t see updates for the last 5 years or more. What you are joining for if you do join is the old content. They do have some 1080p videos and their photosets are very good. Those could be in higher resolution but other than that, you can see how much potential this network once had. Which is why there is no way the price should be $29.95. It’s at best, a $9.95 network for those wanting to see tease and fun porn. Some of the things we used to complain about with porn are now things that kind of make me laugh. Like the Lipstick BJs. Not only does the model make sure she has fresh lipstick on she has to make sure she leaves a lipstick imprint on the man.
There is still something good about this type of porn. I think it’s the feeling of nostalgia. A lot of guys maybe went through the same things these scenes show. It’s hard to give it a high score but it’s not hard to not give it a terrible score. If you liked porn before 2007-08, somewhere in there and there is a promo for the network, it’s worth joining for under $10. I would bump the score up if it was cheaper. The network also is not big, nearly half or maybe more than half of the scenes are on Panty Jobs and that is my favorite site on the network. I don’t mind that. Others probably would mind it. Based on my numbers, if you wanted to call this a live network that is still operating, they have averaged about 50 updates (counting photosets) per year since the network started 15 years ago. I think my score is fair and shows how in-between I was on this long overdue return to an old favorite.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Comes with access to 5 sites
- As an ex-athlete, I've always had the sports girl fetish and this network covers it
- Videos on the various sites are all 740x520ish
- Has surprisingly good navigation for a network
- Panty Jobs is one seriously interesting fetish site (explained in BL)
- Download speeds are above average
Cons:
- One site has very non-exclusive video content, same stuff you see on every cheer DVD
- Updates are questionable, which is becoming the norm these days for these upstart networks. If they are updating, I'm not seeing them!
- No zip download, considering that two of the sites are mainly pictures only, that is a disappointing omission.
- Most of all, the sites for the most part feel "not finished, work in progress"
Bottom Line:
This network got my attention based on two sites they have, Panty Jobs and Sports Girls. My wife's love of handjob porn has never been much a thrill for me since you rarely see all of the woman naked. Panty Jobs has changed the handjob porn niche, now the woman usually topless and only in panties sits on the man and gives a handjob. At first, I thought no big deal, but wait a minute, one of first videos we watched, the man keeps wiggling, the woman is becoming turned on or is a really great actress. She starts teasing him, then slips him out of her hand and into her panties. Very erotic there for me.
Sports Girls was a disappointment, the pictures are sexy, girls in soccer uniforms, softball, etc.. Haven't you always noticed that softball catcher with her legs spread as she squats down and wonder, "I wonder what she would look like naked like that"? I have so there was some enjoyment there, the videos are all from the old cheerleaders DVD series'
The other sites, Cheer Girls tries its best to make you believe these are real cheerleaders, they come closer than most, but it only has pictures. Lipstick BJ is good if you are into blowjobs, but nothing great and only about 20 videos. Panty Girls is only pictures, but I will say, it has a sexy way about the style of pics. Very tease like, all the girls are either cute or pretty so that is a plus. Panty Jobs is by far the best on this network, I will recommend it if you are into tease and sports girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Some really beautiful models that I hadn't seen before.
- Nice size pictures 3000 on high end and the pictures are nice quality in terms of the surroundings highlighting the models' beauty.
- Videos are 720 on high end but...(see cons)
- One of the best navigation sites I have been on. Everything is easy to find.
- Pics available in zip format and download speeds run about average for me.
Cons:
- Videos are very softcore/tease for the most part.
- Videos also take a backseat to the pictures with about 1/10th the amount of videos that they have picture sets.
- Some very skinny models that also are very pale, could be a pro if that is your thing.
- Has a 3 GB daily limit, but that is 90 GB over a month, not even for sure they have 90 GB on the whole site.
Bottom Line:
I knew I would eventually join this site since they have Eve Angel material that I don't have. I ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would. I really fell for this one model, Lilya that they have. Kamilla is also one seriously sexy cute model. So, I didn't regret joining just for Eve's material. They also have some Sophie material which is great for the old collection!
From my count, I have used on average 2.75 GB of the 3.0 GB daily limit, for the last 22 days. So, I've grabbed nearly all of the videos and about 60% of the pictures. The models outside of a few that are way too skinny are attractive in some sort of way for me. Some have an innocent look that really looks innocent. Maybe that explains the softcore nature of the videos?
I found the site fun to be a member of. I don't know if we can ever stress how important navigation is. This site is very smooth in navigation, you can bounce from model to model, set to set, with just a click. I had to laugh a little since it does have a daily limit. Why is it the sites with limits have great navigation that makes everything easy to find?
I wouldn't pick this site over Euro Glamour Girls, but it is close. This site is almost more of a candid look at the models, some are even in jeans in their sets before getting naked. Sophie in jeans is worth a month's membership!
I will recommend it, the tour is excellent and shows a list of all the models they have. The DL Limit isn't too much of a problem. Recommended!
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Point of View site that does the reverse cowgirl POV as good as anyone.
- Good blend of models from stars to ones I've never seen.
- 286 scenes according to my count (see cons and bottom line).
- 146 of the scenes have 1080p, 5 have up to 4K and some of the oldest scenes drop to 480p.
- Photos/screencaps with zip downloads are available.
- Good navigation features and accurate tags.
- Active webmaster that is both helpful and listens to his fans.
Cons:
- It's become clear that there is a certain level of recycle or lost content on the sites on this network.
- As much as I like POV, I do think it gets more repetitive than other hardcore filming styles.
- The oldest scenes here really should be remastered.
- No update schedule or dates on scenes.
Bottom Line:
Mr. POV is the old story of a guy with a camera. They do a better job of POV filming than the average POV site. There's very little bouncing of the camera. Another part they do well with POV that other POV sites fail at is they have the volume at a good, balanced level. A lot of POV sites are very loud due to the camera being in the guy's hand.
They excel most at the reverse cowgirl position, one of the most underrated positions in POV porn. I think this position comes closest to making you feel like you're there. It's a very flattering position for the model (in most cases) and if you've had much reverse cowgirl sex you know you really don't get this good of a view in person.
The models are mostly teen to late 20s. You'll find some stars here like Aaliyah Love and the long-forgotten Bree Olsen, I recognize Allie Addison as a newer model. I don't know that she is that new but she does have a scene here.
I'm not going to completely bomb the score on the review for what is either lost content or removing content and recycling it. Their webmaster is pretty up front about they're a small group. They sometimes don't have new content so they re-release an older favorite. I would like to see them remaster. As for the recycling, which is something I wouldn't say unless I knew it was happening and I felt like it could help others. Those of us that are collectors do look at the numbers to see how much new has been added since our last membership. I've been a member here at least 8 times (since 2015). The 2015 TBP review lists over 300+ scenes. Looking at the content currently there are 17 pages with 16 scenes per page, that's 272 scenes and the 18th page has 14 scenes on it for a total of 286, that's at least 14 less scenes than they had in 2015.
What saves the network and this site too is this is overall a underrepresented niche. Not really the POV but their style of filming, this is porn that is very safe to watch with a woman. It's how I found these sites. One of my exes was really into Manojob and the style of filming they do even on Mr. POV.
It's easy to recommend it to someone that's never been a member or someone that has been a member but didn't keep their downloads. The content they have is very good. If it was me, I would take those old scenes down and start remastering them and put the 720p and up scenes on it.
They're one of those sites/networks that will get some added points for ease of use, good tags, active webmaster, they're trying to make it work and I appreciate that about them.
I would be even happier with Mr POV if they started doing some pussy tease from reverse cowgirl. They do it some on Manojob. It's a good supporting site to the Finishes the Job network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- If you're looking for real amateur Asian porn, or any real amateur porn this might be a site for you.
- Around 900 videos and 7,200 photo sets.
- I haven't seen any censored scenes.
- Small, but very candid and realistic photo sets that can be downloaded in zips, this is fairly rare for an amateur Asian site.
- Navigation does what it needs to do and little else.
- Mixture of solo, m/f, threesomes, lesbian.
- Newer videos are 1080p. Not for sure how rare that is for what looks to be a real amateur site.
- Very good download speeds (85%+ of my max) very important on Asian sites as some are very slow.
Cons:
- No model names (usually a sign of real amateurs).
- No update schedule or dates on the scenes.
- Older scenes are as low as 336p
Bottom Line:
As most of us know most "amateur" scenes in American and European porn feature a guy with a camera with women that often become porn stars. Those sites also usually have top of the line video cameras and the only thing that seems amateur is the camerawork and the model you've never seen before.
This site, My Cute Asian, feels as amateur as it gets. There are 6 minute scenes of a shy Asian woman masturbating in the hallway of an apartment complex. The site's size makes me think it's been around a long time and the oldest videos with an unheard of 336p resolution only make me believe it's as old as I'm thinking and as amateur as I'm thinking.
They don't have a set ethnicity from within the Asian race. There are Filipinas, Japanese, Chinese, Korean and several others represented. It looks almost like a user submitted site.
While it might not appeal to a lot, I think it does to some, zipped photo sets of amateur Asians are extremely rare. The photos range from clothed and teasing in public, to full nudity. I'm willing to admit I could be wrong on the amateur part of this site. Without names, I can't say I recognize any of these models. The one thing that does make me wonder about the production is a few of the models have "My Cute Asian" written on their bodies.
Even so, I believe it's mostly amateur. There's a large variance in looks of the models, some are well below average, others are well above average. Some look older (I would say up to 50. Others look not a day over 18.)
The big plus for me here are the public or semi-public scenes. It's certainly more taboo in Asian countries than European countries and even America.
The cons show the real weaknesses. If you see a model you like you're out of luck. With no names listed you're not likely going to find any other scenes of her. There's no update schedule or dates on the files. On the older scenes there's not even a screencap. It just has a short, descriptive link and you either click it to see what it is or download it and hope for the best.
Surprising to me, the download speeds go very high and since these are amateur videos, many are 10 minutes or less, so I can download them in 10-15 seconds. I have been on several sites from Asian countries that take forever to download a scene.
Don't hold me to this count as the later pages on the site have no screencaps and I'm just trying to add them up. By my count there are 5 videos horizontal, 10 vertical per page and there's 18 pages. That would be around 900 videos. The time of each ranges from 5 minutes to 30 minutes. The photos are also 5 horizontal and 10 vertical and there are 144 pages. That's in the 7,000 photo sets range. The sets have anywhere from 10 photos to 50 in each and all are downloadable.
It could all be organized better but because there's no model names there's really not a lot of ways to organize it. They do have categories but the only categories are nationalities. There's a lot more to like here than dislike.
I have reason to believe they are updating. They list their video count in the 600s and photos at 5600, those have both went up by about 30%.
They do have tags like "hairy", "Chinese" and quite a few others but there's no way to tell how accurate those are.
If this was a standalone site I would recommend it for amateur and Asian fans but it's not a standalone. This site full of mostly amateur content is hidden inside the Japan HDV network. I scored Japan HDV a 97 mostly just for its content. To see that they have other sites like this one makes me think I might have shorted Japan HDV with a 97. I've been a member for going on 5 months and just keep letting it recur.
I will mention that towards the last pages of this site's videos and pictures, I saw one or two models that had familiar names and seeing that 95% or more of the scenes don't tell the model's name maybe there are a few pros thrown in.
The videos are downloadable and the quality does vary which is also common on Asian sites. It's definitely worth a look especially with Japan HDV included and Teen Thais too. This seems like one of the best buys in porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Nubiles decided to make all their models related.
- This site is updating 4 times a month.
- It’s produced by Nubiles, it’s going to be high-quality and that’s true for this site.
- Pretty models, some are more like the word cute, and the acting adds to the cuteness.
- This is very playful porn. It doesn’t take itself seriously. It’s entertaining.
- CCBill is the billing processor. That’s always good.
- Download speeds are very good (80-85% of my max).
- They pull off the cute version of this niche.
Cons:
- It’s porn, I don’t know how high the entertainment factor is supposed to be. I give the models too much negativity for their poor acting. It’s bad enough on here that it’s entertaining.
- The niche has probably seen its better days.
Bottom Line:
You kind of know what to expect with Nubiles. You get the high production, the pretty and cute models, usually younger guys. The stories are not anything you or I would try to publish. There is a cuteness and playfulness to this site that I like. The newest scene has Andi Rose in it. She is one of my favorite models of the newer models. I can’t put my finger on who she reminds me of. It’s a pornstar. Any kind of male/female from Nubiles is going to be a few steps toned down from what you see on a lot of hardcore sites. That’s where I see the playful side. I keep waiting on the guy to say, “Is it in?”
There’s no real theme here besides stepfamily. It is mostly stepbrother and stepsister. Maybe the creampie is the theme. I have told before I am indifferent to creampies. If you really wanted to sell me on the taboo of the creampie with his stepsister, the acting would be better. Even then, it’s not exactly a taboo. The sex is good. The camerawork shows the female’s body off and shows the penetration. Nubiles has that problem of they’re so professional that they may get lost in the too perfect group of scenes.
It updates 4 times per month. They’re going to confuse me with these Seasons and Episodes. It has 142 scenes, which is a good-sized site. Haley Reed is also another of those models I really like. She has a very good scene on here. I give sites so much credit for adding humor to porn. If you just look at the preview for the scene, “Thankful for his Penis” and don’t laugh or smile, you probably won’t like the site. I like the playful side of porn. It shows the models are not as stiff and serious.
They did update to adding some 4K scenes. I still have no use for 4K porn. My vision is not good enough to pick up the differences. It looks like they keep the encoding at a good level. The 4K scenes are in the 5GB range, the 1080p are in the 2GB range, the 720p are 1GB range. They also offer 540, 360 and 270. The tags are very good. One of my favorite parts of all the Nubiles sites are the pictures. The newest scenes have downloads that have 6720x4480 resolution. That was always a strength of Nubiles. I’m glad to see it carrying over to their spinoff sites. You can download the photosets. They do have a medium and small resolution photoset zips option to download as well.
The navigation is simple except for those Seasons and Episodes confusing me. The person that decided to do that needs to stop. Based on Seasons and Episodes they’re releasing scenes out of order. It’s an entertaining site. Very good quality, models look the part the playing and somebody with a sense of humor told them to act. I believe those that are into creampies will get more out of that part. I have the same feeling towards most Asian porn that insists on creampies. It’s a nice addon to a very good network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a public nudity/sex site that has a network with it but some of it doesn't work.
- There are 183 scenes with no dates and no update schedule.
- Has that real public feel to it. They're mostly in the woods and under drainage corridors.
- Good high-end video quality at 1080p with 8000 bitrate, but the next option down drops all the way to 480p.
- Six sites included with membership, maybe.
- Paypal/Epoch is biller.
- Good looking women, a lot of public sites look like they found the models while searching for a place to film.
Cons:
- The extra sites don't work. I had 6 tell me my login is wrong and one was warned by Firefox as having an expired certificate.
- As mentioned in the pros, the high end video is 1080p, the next step down is 480p.
- Most of the other sites "included" aren't ones I would be interested in, one is a knockoff of Bang Bros Bang Bus called Take Van.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a preview for it on a tube site.
My main feeling without going into anything specific is if you like outdoors sex it might be worth a join just for these public scenes.
I really don't know how public these scenes are, but they are outdoors. I am guessing this is filmed somewhere in Europe. And I don't recognize any of these models, these all look like amateurs.
Some of the scenes are shot on a beach but I don't see anyone around. Others are shot at what looks like the backyard of a house near a pool. I think if you use a little imagination they do enough to at least make it seem like it's in public.
The camerawork, which is something I don't talk about a lot, could be improved. At times, it feels like the cameraman is laying on his side trying to get a better view and it gives a bad view of the action.
Having said that, this is still a site with nearly 200 scenes of outdoor amateur sex and if you're into any kind of exhibitionism/public/outdoor, you know there's not a lot of this content available these days. One of the parts I've liked best about the scenes I've watched is the energy from the women. Which makes me believe even more so that this is an amateur site. I wouldn't rate any of the women over an 8 but wouldn't rate any of them under a 5.
The big question is what's going on with the network? This is supposed to be a full network. Each of their videos starts with this "WWMAMM" and it has a button to view all their sites. The network itself is called MMPNetwork, but I can't even sign in the hub. The other sites they show are the Melone Challenge, POVBitch, TakeVan, FakeShooting, ShootYourself and Teeny Playground. My login works on zero of them.
One thing that surprised me is some of the scenes are fairly hardcore, including slaps that leave hand prints on the model's faces. One scene was almost too hardcore for me to make it through as two guys took turns holding the woman, slapping her and what I assume is cussing her, I don't have a clue what they're saying.
That could be a turnoff for the exhibitionism fans since exhibitionism is usually about focusing on the woman.
It's frustrating overall, some of the content it really good, some of it looks like it shouldn't have been released and none of the network sites let me sign in. It's hard to believe a site would go through the trouble of getting Paypal/Epoch as a biller then turn around and have this much going wrong with the network. Take a look at the preview before joining. If it doesn't improve or if I can't get access into any of the other sites, I'll probably come back and adjust the score down a little. TBP lists a 10 video per day download limit, I downloaded 57 and didn't hit any limit. I hate to sound cynical but seeing that nothing else works right on the network, maybe it broke their download limit too! I'm giving it a decent score for the good exhibitionism scenes but could easily see knocking 10 points off of it if things don't improve. I've been a member for two weeks, so I'll update the review in a few weeks to see if they've worked the kinks out or if they're not giving any bonus sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Returning to the teacher/office/librarian fetish as these cougars teach younger men all about sex.
- 746 videos, they also are updating sporadically, and a total of 436 models.
- Technical quality is very high.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Epoch is the biller.
- Downloads for videos and photo zips, I haven’t hit any limits.
Cons:
- Ads, they’re not bad once you’re on a site but are bad from the hub.
- The pictures need to be a higher quality.
- Old scenes are not near the technical quality of the newer ones.
Bottom Line:
I’m starting to think I should go back to school. This is possibly the least believable of the reality sites I’ve reviewed recently. Mainly because the men are men I’ve seen in other porn scenes. Most of these women look nothing like teachers.
The sheer number of scenes still makes this a good site. You’re sure to find some scenes you like. The technical quality is impressive too. They have been offering 4K since 2014 and still are. They have 1080p, 720p and this specific site has some VR scenes which I’m not happy about. Is it not possible to set up a regular camera to record the scene in non-VR? I know there isn’t a lot of those scenes but it just seems like a bad business idea to have a porn site with scenes that only people with a VR headset can watch without having to go through some kind of strange workaround. They do at least tell you how to do it without a VR headset.
The action on this site is quite good. Unlike the older male teacher with younger female student site they have, the women on this one take control. That means you get a lot of cowgirl positions on top of the teacher’s desk. It’s a very good view. They just lose some credibility in the stories with their choice of “teachers”. I know that tattoos are common for teachers but tattoos, 3 inches of makeup, stiletto heels, a mini-skirt and a shirt that’s two sizes too small trying to contain the teacher’s oversized implants is a bit much.
Thankfully, the women don’t try to act like they can act. It’s kind of like watching parody porn. Nearly every MILF model you can think of has a scene on this site. I really like Sophia Deluxe, I don’t think I’ve seen her before. I also liked but didn’t recognize Brooke Berreta. I won’t leave out longtime favorite Aaliyah Love who is finally starting to age. That woman stayed 18 for 18 years.
I didn’t take off for this but there’s not that much teaching. It’s more like the teacher gets the guy hard and jumps on him then he just goes along with whatever she does.
The picture sets are good. I just wish they would shoot them in a higher resolution. I would go as far as saying Naughty America has the best picture sets of any of the big boy porn networks. It’s one reason I keep coming back. This site itself is good for those with that teacher fetish and for those that like older women with younger guys. I will say all the couples didn’t give me the feeling of older woman with younger guys. Some of them looked the same age. It’s another good site for the Naughty America network.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
