Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the greatest and most consistent porn sites I have ever joined.
- Generally, very pretty or cute models.
- You can download the videos and photosets (which are the some of the best). I haven’t hit a limit.
- Good download speeds around 80% of my max.
- Navigation is close to perfect.
- CCBill is the biller.
- The numbers are so large I will have to put those in the bottom line.
- Updates more than once per day and I will have to explain that in the bottom line.
Cons:
- This is a real con to me. I don’t find a small percentage of the models that pretty or cute. One is a current model. I won’t name her.
- It’s mainly innocent amateurs. That’s not Nubiles fault. You won’t get the best performances out of some of these models.
Bottom Line:
I have a lot of extensions from the pros and cons to explain. I’m going to start with the second con. I think the first con is just subjective. The second one could be a major pro for you. It’s not a major pro for me. Some of the models are genuinely shy and innocent. You can tell it. It hurts the performances for me. I know that some love the shy and innocent models. It’s not a dealbreaker. I may be showing my age. If you’re going to be naked, why not enjoy it and show the world what a budding star you are?
The updates are hard to number. Yesterday, they had 3 updates. The day before they had 1 update. The day before that they had 2 updates. From the first of March to the eighth of March, they had 15 updates. Just below two per day. I haven’t seen a day that they didn’t have at least one. It’s possible you could complain that the updates are of the same model. I don’t see the complaint. They release 3-5 updates of one model. I would rather them do it this way.
The video resolution on the videos includes downloads at 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. The older scenes are lower quality. This site has been around a long time. The photosets are downloadable in three sizes. The highest is near 4000 long end, the medium is 2400 long end, the small is 1200 long end. Some of their other sites have higher photo resolutions. As much as I like their photos on Nubiles.net, I would like to see those resolutions a little higher. That’s another it’s not a dealbreaker. It’s not even a con.
This site comes with Nubiles Porn and it is directly accessible with the link at the bottom of the Nubiles Porn main page. I’m glad to see they integrated it. A warning, you will be on this site for awhile and may forget your Nubiles Porn sites. Nubiles.net has over 2,600 models. That’s a big site. You see more numbers with 11,254 videos and 12,236 photosets. That’s bigger than the entire rest of Nubiles Porn combined times 10. It will remind you of Met-Art in that regard. You’re sure to find something you don’t like. It is one of the few sites that does quantity and quality. The navigation is as simple as a site of this size can have.
The part I want to talk a little more about is their tagging system. I don’t know if this is new or not. I don’t believe I would miss this. They have tags for their videos. They have tags for their photos. They have tags for Public Photosets and Public Videos. I don’t ever remember these public tags. I checked them. That picks at me. The public photo tags have scenes in the bedroom. I was ready to give bonus points for that. I’m looking at one page of 18 photosets with the public tag. My eyes see two in public. I’m wondering if those tags are connected to the model. I see mainly the same models in multiple sets. That new tag category is not accurate.
If you don’t know what Nubiles.net specializes in, it’s solo and some hardcore with a guy that I don’t even fool with. They have a hardcore tab at the top of the members area. It looks like they only update the hardcore scenes every few months. The hardcore is not a major part of the site. I always felt like the Nubiles Porn sites should be more focused on the hardcore. They have the solo part figured out. That’s if ain’t broke.
You will get a combination of teasing, stripping, giggling, blushing and masturbation. The masturbation is where you will see that most of these models are amateurs. That could be good or bad. Some of the models look like they are only that experienced masturbating in one position. There is an innocence to the scenes. You will find some pro-amateur models that are more known, and they are very good at the masturbation. The more innocent acting models are only so-so on their performances, to me and solo porn has been my favorite genre of porn since 2005. The masturbation scenes are not their strongest feature. That’s why I like the photos so much.
This site’s first update was in 2004. That Is an interesting thing to know. That was 18 years ago. That means it’s possible some of the new models weren’t even born when this site started. I was reading about Lebron James wanting to play pro basketball with his son. I have watched so much family porn that I am now wondering if a site that has been around as long as this one would consider bringing a model back from 2004 with her daughter in a split scene. That would be marketable. I used that to lead into the closing. That is something I can’t talk myself into listing as a con. Some of these models are so young and innocent acting. I believe that is either a very big pro or a potential con for people that join the site. Either way, it’s as good as you will get for teen porn. I have always said I prefer the mid-20s to mid-30s models. If you’re really into teens and younger looking and acting models, you could add some points to my score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite in the softcore niche, still going strong.
- 9,989 scenes, includes video and pictures.
- 2,307 models, all are teens or at least look like teens.
- Downloads are unlimited.
- 11 new models in the last week. The schedule seems to follow that pace.
- Long forgotten bonus content that I'll mention in bottom line.
- Comes with the Nubiles Porn Network, but is a strong, standalone site as well.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Is one of the better values in porn, especially on the yearly deals.
- Navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I've always been between 88 - 97 on this site. The content at times does feel too repetitive and that's what I'm running into in this current membership.
- Shy and innocent can be attractive depending on the model but it can also be frustrating and feels fake with some.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those reviews where I feel bad that I've lowered it to a 90. I've been a member of Nubiles off and on for at least 10 years. It's one of the best tease, solo, masturbation sites on the internet but those types of scenes can become repetitive if the models aren't standout performers in the genre.
Technically, the site is superior to 98% of sites. While they don't have 4K videos they offer 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. Their picture sets are comparable to the big photo sites with downloadable zips in small 1200x800, medium 2400x1600 and large 3600x2400. With an average of more than one new model per day you can see that this site really doesn't need a network with it.
I mentioned the bonus content as I had forgot it even has bonus content. One of my favorite teen tease models is one of those, Katrina18, who I think had a lot more content on her solo bonus site than it shows now but she was a very popular model years ago. They have a bonus girls section and several other videos in the bonus section. They also show Sweet Kandie and Vicky Vane as being bonus sites you receive if you stay for 2 months or more.
Their navigation helps them even more. They have over 100 tags and each tag tells you exactly how many scenes they have with the tagged action. They have separate tag lists for videos and photos. They also have public tags for videos and photos.
There's a full, easy to use model list and something you don't see as much these days, an upcoming list of models that shows their next 3 models.
They also use CCBill for their billing.
You really can't find anything wrong with any of that. The content, really it's the videos, can be very hit or miss. I have watched 4-5 videos in a row without feeling anything that sexual about them outside of them being naked and cute. I think I have defended this in the past and will here too. A lot of these models are new to the porn world or at least in their earliest days, so there is some nervousness. I think from past comments, some viewers enjoy that, others don't. I fall into the don't group as I like to see the models looking confident and enjoying themselves. The ones that are not as confident don't look like they're enjoying themselves and look like their main goal is to get finished with the scene.
They do still film some hardcore scenes and it looks like they've dropped that to once per month. I don't usually download those as it's usually an experienced male model with an inexperienced female model and that usually doesn't do anything for me.
A feature I like in their navigation is the search by month and year. It works well here, I've seen other sites try it and between wonky dropdown boxes and bad clicks, it doesn't work well. It works exactly as it should here and the advantage to this is Nubiles has had their better years. Like most porn sites there are years or months where the content just doesn't feel as strong as previous months and years.
Another favorite part is the inclusion of major future stars before they were stars. Everyone from Eve Angel to Veronica Rodriguez to Valerie Rios has content here early in their careers.
It's very good content especially for those newer to porn and because I have heard this several times, for female viewers. I believe the perceived innocence is a big attraction for female viewers.
It's still a top-tier site in its niche, one of the best even but I just found myself a little bored with the content. I could also mention there's not a lot of variety in the races of the models which might hurt my enjoyment of it since I do like a variation in models. I would compare that to me not being as positive about ALS Scan as I used to be for the same reason. For most everyone else this is a site you should join at least once and give it a try as it's easy to use, easy to find what you're looking for and you're going to see a lot of naked, innocent, young women.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest, best, longest-running teen sites on the internet.
- Going to put this in because it's rare these days, very responsive webmaster who helps with any and everything you ask.
- Very good quality videos and photo sets.
- TBP/PU price is good, especially if you've never been a member.
- Four updates per day, two videos and two picture sets. Can't beat that these days.
- Over 1,700 models. Will mention there's lots of eventual hardcore models who shot softer sets here on Nubiles in the beginning of their careers.
- They seem to be tinkering with the idea of becoming a network, though I actually rate this site Nubiles.net better than the network and it includes this site.
- Search engine on site is comprehensive and I believe it's very accurate based on my years of collecting Nubiles videos.
- Download speeds are very good (7.2 MB/sec), I can reach a little over 8 MB/sec, but many sites won't even reach 5 MB/sec.
- Navigation works well (See bottom line)
Cons:
- I know I never would have believed this, but seeing pretty young women getting naked then masturbating or having sex with another girl or even guy can become repetitive.
- You'll run into some naming/alias issues with some of the Euro models, but that's pretty common.
I reached on those two. Crickets are now out.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is one of the sites that once made me say, "I think they have a hot teen factory in their studio." I don't know how they do it, but it's as if Nubiles just churns out hot teens everyday. I have a lot of single male friends! Where do they get these young women?
I've had a long-running complaint with nearly every site that has Euro models from the mid-2000s forward. I'm obsessive about my filing of model content. Like every other site featuring these models, there's some odd names/aliases. I will say Nubiles has gotten a lot better about this one.
My other complaint is one I'm sure they've heard before. Sometimes the scenes lack passion or believable interest from the model. The scenes being in similar locations and doing similar actions, only leads to more problems with it becoming repetitive, but ...
In their defense, many of these models are shooting their first porn scenes or are in the very early stages of their career. It's a trade-off I think we have to accept as porn users. The girls show genuine shyness. To some that might make the scenes even hotter, but to some it's going to make the scene not as hot as we thought it would be. It's a fine-line and I've chose not to take off points for it this time.
What you do get is a staggering collection of young women, teasing, naked, masturbating. There's some girl/girl scenes and boy/girl scenes, but I mostly like the solo scenes. It's hard for me to even comprehend "over 1700 models". Most of you know I'm one of those numbers people. That 1,700 models number means if you wanted to you could see a new model everyday for 4.5 years. I ran out of characters in the pros, but I'll add it here, all this content is exclusive too.
I reviewed the Nubiles Porn network a month or so ago and didn't like it as good as Nubiles.net, even though Nubiles.net is included with it. I just didn't like the slight navigational differences. The network has a new, cleaner navigational interface so it makes Nubiles.net feel outdated. I've always had trouble deciding how important one aspect of porn sites is in comparison to a different aspect.
I feel comfortable after reviewing over 250 sites to say the same thing I said way back in 2008, "The models and content makes a site". That's why I scored the network lower. It has good content, good models, but I see no use for it. I don't want to turn this into a business rant, but my general way of thinking was, "Why not spend that money on upgrading on Nubiles.net?" That's why I'm not a webmaster. I'm also in no position to question Nubiles webmaster. He's one of the best and has been for years. I think he moved up into a class by himself when Shap sold Twistys.
The bonus sites included with Nubiles.net are the very sites that comprise the Nubiles Porn network. They are scenes with a common theme. Most of which were obviously created to break the formulaic style of Nubiles.net. I can appreciate it and like all of the content.
Nubiles.net has four updates per day. It's nearly unheard of in 2016. Their picture sets are excellent in quality, always start with the model dressed, strip down, to spreading their legs fully nude. The videos are your standard young woman gets naked, teases a little, then masturbates. Formulaic? Sure. But it works. I'm starting to think our complaining about the scenes being too similar might turn into a "don't fix what isn't broke" situation. I'm not saying the network will cause Nubiles to fail, but I've seen it happen with other top-tier sites that try the network route.
Despite preferring the network's navigation, I don't think Nubiles is at all bad. The search engine alone is worth a few visits just to see how many combinations you can come up with. There are 15 attributes (age, boob size) you can choose from. There are 15 outfits (thong, skirt) to choose from. There are 9 actions (Sybian, lesbian) to choose from and finally 3 environments to choose from. There's even a button to select "girls only" to remove any scenes with males in them. There's an alphabetical model list. An option to pick what the most sexual action the model does (topless to sex).
So, why am I still holding out on a perfect 100 rating? Personal preferences. I do like curvy models. There's not many here and I don't think curvy is Nubiles audience so it's understandable. If you don't mind that you'll be very happy with this site. It's a little like Met-Art, but more sexual. It's a little like Twistys, but has more character and less glam. And it's a lot like Nubiles from 10 years ago. Even when I felt I had valid complaints in previous reviews, it's been in my top sites. And that's because of the content and quality of models. They're consistently very good as long as you're able to see around the shyness of some of the models and able to realize you're watching a young woman get naked on camera for one of the very first times in her career.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Originally reviewed site over 2 years ago, original review expired, Nubiles is one of the few sites that has improved consistently and is now one of my favorite sites.
- New videos are 1280 high end with 3500 bitrates, new picture sets are 2400 high end, pictures come zipped in "low" or "high" size, videos have several options and can be downloaded in parts or whole scenes
- They really impress me with their constant "new" models that sometimes aren't really new to the world of porn, but are usually still pretty new and are new to the site.
- Shoots are more serious now than they used to be, not as much lollipops and bobbisocks and trying to make the model look one day over 18.
- Navigation is nice and smooth, model list makes for easy to find models, especially ones going by different names, nice size thumbnails that show the model so you can recognize her.
- Broad range of models from America, Europe, but not a lot of range in race.
- Some of the interviews are enjoyable
Cons:
- Wish they would remaster some of the old sets, they have some really great content of Eve Angel, Sandra Shine and a few others that was from 2004-05 that would look exceptional in full scene HD and remaster the pictures as well.
- Some of the shoots are very softcore, though most at least show everything, many of the older videos are simply of the girls rolling around naked on the bed.
Bottom Line:
Nubiles is one of those rare sites that has chased its potential, without giving up. Their model selection is one of the best on the internet.
One of my very favorite "newer" models is Tanner Mayes and Nubiles was one of the first sites that I know of, to shoot her.
One thing that I think can be confusing is when you look at their model list based on their member rankings. This is what I see in the top 10.
Of those 10 I know two, Bree and Franziska, never seen or heard of the other 8. Also the top 3 look young enough that I would ID them. Maybe it gives off the wrong image of the site? I've never really been into the very teen group and those 3 practically define it!
Others on the site include early content of Amy Reid, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Tanner Mayes, and literally dozens of established stars.
The newer videos are 1280 with 3500 bitrate and look great, even the older videos are not bad, the Eve videos are from 5 years ago and are 640 high end, so that isn't bad at all.
The pictures have a nice crispness to them, but do agree with others that the watermark is a bit distracting.
The site updates daily, but not for sure on the exact amount of updates per day since they do seem to vary, I've seen some days that have as many as 6 updates per day, other days as few as 3. Either way, you get a lot of updates in a month's time and they have a nice sized amount of content overall.
The site in some ways reminds me of a blend between ALS Scan and FTV Girls, which should be taken as a 100% pure compliment. They really seem to be hitting their peak at their site at the right time. I've been a member 4 of the last 6 months and continue to enjoy the membership.
They have this update called "New faces" and this is where they add 3 new girls per week to their site. I like this, though I am not a big fan of amateur content, these girls usually are ones that I have not seen before or have seen very little content of if I have seen them.
Picture size continues to improve, zips are quick and easy to download, though they do limit your connections to 6 at a time.
As I said in the cons, the main improvements I would ask for is remastering of old content. ALS Scan has had a great deal of success with their remastering process and think it would make me move this site even up higher if they did it too. Also has a member forum, some bonus girls and bonus content that is mostly hardcore and the site has a nice blend of hardcore b/g, g/g, solo.
The content is also exclusive as far as I know though a few sets are in familiar settings that I have seen before, I still believe these are exclusive, probably just using the same shoot area that other sites have.
Well worth a month join and in my case, a multi-month join. Recommended to all!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Nice amateur but professional feeling site
- Plenty of girls on here who we know aren't amateurs, but the settings and clothing they start out in makes them look the part of an amateur
- Over 400 models, pics are very good resoultion and have some original settings that you won't see on most sites
- Good, believable masturbation videos of some of the models
- Access to Katrina 18, and Spring Break Fuck Adventures
Cons:
- Some of the best looking models only doing very tame softcore
- Videographer can be annoying, but funny at times
- As with any site that has been around awhile, some of the older videos could be improved.
Bottom Line:
I was really surprised by the amount of material they have, also 100% exclusive. I guess after you look at multiple sites over a period of time, you start noticing the same girls on each of them, but Nubiles has many that I have never seen before. Katrina 18 is absolutely gorgeous for you blonde and slim lovers. Where I give them bonus points is the bonus site, Spring Break Fuck Adventures, not that it is original or anything like that, but there is your hardcore that most of the young model sites don't have.
Pictures are very good quality and some settings are original. The videos fall right in that above average quality, but could be improved group. What I really would like to mention is that the videographer, similar to FTV's has a good sense of humor, but can be annoying at times. You keep expecting him to start throwing money at the models to get them to take more off or to do more with themselves.
My biggest complaint could be a positive for others. Some of the sets are just way too innocent looking. I like younger women just as much as the next guy, but pigtails while in a playroom? I know the women are 18 or older, but I just can't get into those settings like that one. If you like teens this is a great site though and you will see some of the top stars in the business here as well, "before they were stars" kind of feel to those. I enjoyed it overall and think it may be an underrated site by most, recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About as close to exhibitionism as you can find these days on pay sites.
- Video count is in the thousands, but is misleading.
- Photos with downloadable zips (a major plus on a site like this)
- Some good exhibitionism including full sex and these are amateurs.
- I would call it a voyeur site based on most of the scenes are filmed more like the couple or group doesn't know it.
- Very fast download speeds (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- The biggest con is there are many videos on this site that are split into parts, as many as 17 (maybe more, that's the most I've seen). See bottom line.
- No dates on the scenes. The only way to tell the newer scenes are likely over the last few years is the people's iPhone 6+ or higher laying near them. That's putting in research work.
- Besides the obvious known problems with amateur models (some unattractive), there's no way to find more content of ones you like.
Bottom Line:
I'm pacing myself to my 500th review and thought I would try this site out. Fundamentally, there's nothing at all wrong with the site. Some of the videos are downloadable in HD. All the videos are downloadable. They have a nice section called "Albums" that has all the different photo sets of women they don't have videos of. It just has a few minor flaws.
Those split up videos are almost understandable. They are usually a Swinger Party, there are people everywhere. The split parts focus on one couple or threesome. It reminds me of watching the male stripper sites like Dancing Bear and Party Hardcore. It's hard to fault them for splitting those long scenes up to focus on a couple. One of my biggest complaints about those two male stripper sites was they took the camera off the sexiest women. But there's no way to find all the parts. And they are short videos (3-5 minutes).
I'm not going to be that rough on the score on that part. I would be complaining if they filmed 2 hour scenes and switched the camera from sexy woman to not sexy woman.
This is sex, some masturbation and some of it is just flashing/spying. I don't know where it's filmed at but I am guessing it's not in the United States.
I'm also going to guess it's near impossible to know if they are updating. There are no dates. With Covid over the last 15 months, it just seems unlikely they are. This is more like the porn sites we used to join to enjoy the hunt. That's what you're going to be doing here.
Just to show the difficulty the site creates, there is a scene I really liked titled Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 03/06. They show 12 related videos over to the right but none of those are Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, part 02, 01, 04. However, they did get a Voyeur Sex On The Beach 56 part 04/04 in the related. It reminds me of the old newsgroup websites. The search does partially work. If you search for Voyeur Sex On The Beach 55, it will bring up all the Voyeur Sex On The Beach scenes but doesn't recognize the number on the title.
Technical quality can't really be complained about. The videos are easily and quickly downloaded, even the 1080p ones. The videos have screencaps with them but those differ from the photo sets in the "Albums" section. The albums section seems to be pure voyeurism of someone taking pictures of a nude woman walking around.
With so many sites known for their exhibitionism shoots no longer shooting those types, it leaves us who like public exhibitionism looking for replacements. My score is more based on this is real exhibitionism/voyeurism, the site works well, the quality is there, the downloads are there and I think for most exhibitionism fans the attractiveness of the woman isn't the attraction. Most of these women would at worst be considered "average" looking. The sex scenes have a problem all amateur sites have. There's only one camera view. They are still good.
I just don't know if a membership is warranted unless you just want to try a relatively cheap public site for a month. I have seen worse but not many with much better, especially of amateurs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a lesbian site with the added basis of a wrestling match.
- Some scenes have good believability in the wrestling matches, others not so much.
- Will go into the exact numbers in BL, but all the videos are available in 1920x1080.
- Quite a few of the scenes have the "high" quality photo zips available, these are a little over 4000 on the long end.
- If joined through the 21 Sextury site comes as one of 37 sites I received in my first month.
- Good DL speeds and navigation is mostly just scroll until you find the scene(s) want.
- At least seems to be an accurate network site when you click a model's name in a scene, her other scenes across the network come up so if you want to see more of her.
Cons:
- Some of the matchups are more funny than believable like Peaches against anyone or the Sophie Moone vs. Cindy Hope. Sweet Peaches doesn't look like she could ever hurt anything. Same with Sophie. I guess you could call that miscasting.
- Older picture zips are only available in 1280 option. Definitely would like to see those "high" option zips being available in all future sets.
- Update schedule is a little inconsistent. Last match video was on 1-28-11, they were coming once a week when that one came out. In February 2011, site was updated with 6 backstage videos, no match videos.
Bottom Line:
I've always been intrigued by this fight niche. For one, the women are usually athletic built and for two, they're usually wearing skin tight clothes.
Believability in any of the fight sites just isn't that high. It's not that I don't think some of the ladies aren't skilled or trained, it's just that there is poor acting in convincing me that they don't want to kiss the other woman or convincing me that they really don't like being fingered during the match.
On a side, funny, note. One of the scenes, about 1/4 of the way into the movie, the "fighters" seem to decide to just skip the fight part and start kissing! But that is one of the best scenes so I'm not complaining.
On the technical quality side this site is very high. On videos, you have multiple quality options, low, medium, high and ultra. Two formats, wmv and mp4 and all sets on this site, listed as 85 as of today (February 28) are available in 1920x1080.
Pictures are high quality in terms of how they look and I almost thought the "high" quality zips were going to be available on all sets, but they're not. The standard photo zip size of the photos is 1280 long end. The high quality photo zip photos are an impressive 4368 long end.
This is a site, in my opinion, that works well with the 4300 res pictures since a big part of the enjoyment for a viewer of this niche is seeing if we can get a sneak peek up the shorts or a nip slip.
Still not really for sure what's going on with the updates. It looks like the first 10 matches or so didn't have backstage videos released for those and they're releasing them now. If the new match videos don't start showing up in the updates, I will post an update to this review.
Overall, I like this site and its potential. I would like to see the more athletic girls in these matches than the glam girls. There isn't much of a scoring system in these matches or if it is I haven't noticed it. The ones I've watched just have the girls rolling around trying basic head locks, hair pulling and face sitting. Some of the girls are better about faking their disgust with having a woman sitting on their face or their disgust of being kissed by a woman. Works best if you're into the porn that requires a little imagination to believe. Which I don't mind at all.
There is very little to complain about with this site. The backstage videos are okay. If you like a certain model, you will probably like her backstage video. I'm sure there are some things that could be improved with the site like the believability with maybe a scoring system. The only other complaint would be the amount of content. I counted around 60-61 actual match videos so there isn't a ton of content here, but when combined with the network access it's a nice little diversion from the normal lesbian scenes. Recommended to check out as a member of their network. Worth a few laughs too like when one doesn't quite pull the other fighter's bra off, so the fighter pulls her own bra off. I enjoyed it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively large site in the Fantasy Massage network. Focuses mostly on M/F but there are F/F and up to threesomes.
- Some well-known models and others that might be more mainstream than I realize but all are attractive.
- DL speeds are very good (80% of my max and above).
- Oldest content dates back to 2009 and the videos all have 1080p options, picture set with each scene and can be downloaded in zip files.
- I'm guessing it's one of the oldest massage sites. It updates weekly and has 529 scenes as of 11/13/2018.
- Very good mixture of models, it seems at one time they were going for Asian models but there are other races.
- Any site that's been around since say around 2010, has a high collector potential since a lot of these models have stopped modeling. They have one of my favorites in multiple scenes, the highly underrated Lana Violet.
Cons:
- It's mostly nitpicking, model list includes men and there's no way to filter the men out. Unless I missed it.
- Some scenes never really feel like a massage scene. That could be the use of known pornstars. No offense is meant to Asa Akira but as soon as I see her I think porn!
Bottom Line:
I have to admit something about my interest in this genre. Over the last few months, I started dating an Esthetician. It has opened my eyes to this profession, massages and waxes. I've also talked about how I sometimes delve into the dark world of fantasizing about the woman I'm with doing things with other men. Trust me, it's not that I like that side of me but it works.
Nuru Massage's older content especially goes into that part of massages. The newer content does to an extent but some of it really just feels like it could be a scene in a normal porn movie. The basis, again, especially in the older scenes, is a man (usually) goes to get a massage. The masseuse oils him up, giving him peeks up her skirt, at her cleavage and usually takes the porn turn when she notices the tent being pitched by the towel laying across his crotch. This works for me. Especially with the Asian models. Because the woman I've been dating is Filipino and the minute she thinks sex might happen she's ready. Doubt it if you must but there's at least one other member on here with a Filipino wife who would tell you the same thing. So, I really prefer the scenes with the Asian models.
I think these sites, any of them, these days are stuck with the models they have access to and more and more, whether on Bang Bros or Brazzers, there's a lack of interest/passion. Some of the newer scenes here at Nuru Massage also have that problem. The good part is, as far back as their content goes, you can get HD quality videos. It's kind of like you don't have to start at the newest content to find the best quality.
Any site that stays within their theme/niche has the potential to become repetitive but I will say they do a good job here of mixing things up. You get some F/F scenes, some with F/F/F, some M/F/F and the standard M/F which for me is the most believable. I think if I had the chance to produce a scene or two, I would look into working in more from less. Every scene doesn't have to progress to sex. Have it stop at a handjob or a blowjob. With the name "fantasy" in the network name, I would play more to that. Instead of following every other hardcore porn scene.
The models are very attractive. One of the ones I didn't know of that I really like is Rilynn Rae, other longtime favorites like Uma Jolie, even everybody's favorite MILF Brandi Love (she has a really good scene with Uma Jolie on All Girl Massage, in this network.) Keisha Grey is here with all her lovely curves. And as mentioned, Lana Violet who I originally knew of thanks to Twistys years ago. I find scenes of her about twice a year.
You also get the niche on top of niche with some scenes playing into the step-family niche. That is seen more on the All Girl Massage site with stepmoms and stepdaughters massaging each other. But there are some on Nuru as well. You know when Brandi Love shows up she's somebody's stepmother!
The navigation is very good across the network even. It's a Gamma network so if you've been a member of any of the Fame Digital networks, it works like those do. You have the different network sites on the left and can go to each seamlessly. At the top you have categories, which is more useful here than on a lot of sites because you can pick the actions you want to see and it lists them by the action. I'll point out here that I myself like the "Pussy rubbing cock" action and while it might be a little too broad in its results, it does pull out (not intended) the scenes with that great tease.
They have the model list with the problem mentioned in the cons but that's pretty common for networks to include the males in the list. I really believe the only problem that can be legitimately be complained about is it can become repetitive. My years of only joining solo sites tells that repetitive doesn't bother me as long as it's good repetitive. Most of this content is good. It adds almost a softer side to hardcore but doesn't fall into heartcore area.
The other complaint is my own. Just mix it up some, beyond F/F scenes and F/F/F scenes. Have the masseuse use a wand massager on the guy's back and thighs and then in-between her and him. It's minor stuff that I think would keep the content fresher. No complaints on the quality. I will say the picture sets are screenshots from the videos so it's not a 50-100 picture set of just the female. It's hard to complain about that these days since a lot of sites are going completely away from pictures. As that old saying goes something is better than nothing. I think this site would appeal to those who like hardcore, those who like a theme and those who know an Esthetician who likes to tell you about her experiences doing waxes (close enough to massages) and how the clients (both female and male) "respond". I haven't checked out all of the network yet but I will and maybe some of my own twisted fantasies are in here somewhere. As a network it's very good and recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Let the kookiness begin. Young women that are forcefully pushed as young, that are also nymphos.
- Fun site that doesn’t take itself very seriously and through all the fun they do a good job of hardcore sex.
- They have around 6 updates per month and over 200 scenes. I haven’t seen many throwaway scenes either.
- For the second month in a row a site got me to join based on seeing one model and they have a lot of those models that could get anyone to join. For me it was Kira Perez.
- Fast downloads at 90% my max.
- High quality but no 4K that I can find.
- Downloadable videos and photosets.
Cons:
- You may laugh a little at the production setup for some of these scenes. Do you remember when porn insisted on putting young women in bobby socks and giving them a lollipop? That was a tame way to convince the viewer she’s young, once you see some of these scenes. That could bother some in our politically correct society.
- A little frustrating camerawork. Don’t push the woman out of the camera’s view to get your dick into the camera’s view!
Bottom Line:
I have tried quite a few, “new to me” sites over the last few months and there does seem to be a strong trend on content moving towards hardcore with passion or even hardcore with playfulness. This site gets a lot of the playfulness then throws It off the cliff. I admit, I laughed knowing how many people cringe at the backgrounds on this site. Pastel color sheets, bedding, pillows with superhero words on them (pow! Bang!) and for the first time in the history in porn … unicorns. Seriously people, just go back to showing her driver’s license if her age being that young is that important. I find humor in the production but others, these days, may not.
Once you get over the unicorns and rainbows it turns into a fairly hardcore site. The scenes could use a little more of everything besides unicorns. It is 2022, we really aren’t still believing all young women need to be seduced into turning nympho do we? Or that unicorns or rainbows will help with that seduction? They do a good enough job of convincing me the sex has passion in it. It could just be that the young women in the scenes are that good at sex. The models are all attractive. Kira Perez stood out to me. She’s one of the more unique looking models on the site. She’s also one of the ones that’s really into her scene. The bad part of that is she’s not near as young as I thought at 23 and she’s only 4’11” 107.
The technical quality is very good as long as you don’t require 4K. The videos all have the HD resolutions to download and the smaller ones for those that I guess use phones or tablets for porn. I haven’t taken that step. The photosets are better than I expected. They are just videocaps but after talking to a webmaster, I am starting to see the point of videocaps instead of traditional photos. They get better “action” shots when it’s videos that they take stills from. They’ll talk you out of believing anything. The caps do look good. The navigation works without problems. It’s pretty straightforward, it’s not a huge site with tens of thousands of scenes. They have 150 models and to my surprise there was Amia Miley. Is she going for a record for how many decades she performed in porn? It says she’s 32. She can still pull off just about any look, similar to Aaliyah Love. I remember reviewing sites with Amia on them probably when she was 18. It does show they’re not just aiming at barely legal models. They should have Amia back based on her scene. I also noticed Kenna James, I’m sure I’ve seen her before, but surprised again to see her age listed as 27. She doesn’t look a day over the day she turned 18. I do think they go a little far with the settings. There are building blocks for God’s sake. It makes me think of an old porn site that pushed the barely legal niche and one of the reviewers said he keeps waiting on someone to step on a Lego during the scene. I like the humor in porn and have received many negative comments about it.
I do believe they could add something to the site. They do have bonus videos from other sites but those bonus videos are not much different than their videos. It’s a narrow niche that walks very close to gonzo porn. I believe that would be more believable if the models were as young as they are portrayed. I have seen several of these models do a very good job of acting their way through a scene even with just a minor story and plot. A site like this one could really benefit from showcasing the women. This is made up perfectly, with the name Nympho, to have the guy walk in and catch the woman masturbating. That’s a simple, basic idea that goes with the youth of the models that they’re trying to convince me of. Just something little like that angle at the scenes. As it is, I could see it becoming boring and repetitive. With only the best of the models standing out. Still, it’s a good site and it’s a newer site. May take them a little while to get their footing and find their niche besides unicorns! There are llamas or emus too. Little toy ones. I recommend it as a throwback to the Euro porn days of “the younger, the better”.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best secretary/office sites on the internet.
- 556 downloadable scenes but no photos. They do have screenshots.
- Easy navigation considering the size of the site but I don't know if Adult Time is maybe considering buying this site or the network it's on, there are several Adult Time ads mixed in with the scenes.
- Fairly high level of creativity. This is censored which I still believe allows for more creativity.
- Lots of upskirts and downblouses leading to sex.
- Some of the scenes are very long, one is nearly 2 hours. Most are in the 30-45 minute range.
- Includes access to All Japanese Pass. A network of 20+ Japanese sites.
Cons:
- Video quality is from standard definition DVDs or 480p. You will find a few here and there that are better quality.
- Even with the added creativity there is only so much you can do with an office, desk and people.
- Those Adult Time ads are annoying.
Bottom Line:
Office/secretary porn is becoming a thing of the past. Personally, I enjoy it and for me it also goes into teacher/librarian since the clothes are similar.
These scenes will show you more can be done with such a narrow niche. How about a near 2 hour scene in a conference room where only 10 of maybe 50 people get involved in the sex scene? I do find scenes like these to be funny since the dressed men and women not involved in the scene continue to go about their business like nothing is going on. There's a woman laying on the table in front of you completely nude with one guy having sex with her and another getting a blowjob! The dressed actors do a good job of selling that they are not paying attention.
Most of the scenes are not that creative. There are a lot of one on one, stereotypical even, "Job interview" type scenes or bored office workers deciding to test out how soundproof their cubicle is.
The video quality isn't really a letdown since most of the content is from DVDs, maybe all of it even. The one tip I can share about watching 480p videos on a newer monitor is change your screen resolution to the one closest to the aspect ratio of the 480p videos. As long as it's not a long, tedious process to change your resolution it is a simple fix that can improve the viewing experience.
Most of the models featured are known Japanese stars but they do have several amateur ones. I think my favorite scenes in the Japanese office niche is one we never see in American porn. The female executive with her errand boy. The errand boy always happens to be carrying a magic wand type sex toy. This leads to scenes of the executive sitting on her desk or chair with the errand boy using the magic wand on her while she still has panties and sometimes stockings on. Those scenes almost always last between 45-60 minutes and end up turning into sex.
The changes I would like to see aren't likely possible. There is a clear story to every scene but no subtitles. You have to let your eyes tell you what is being said. The video quality doesn't really bother me, 720p would be better but it's really not bad. And pictures. Pictures on a secretary/office site should be mandatory. These Japanese models are teasing the way Euro models did years ago and it's a shame to miss out on that teasing in video.
You do get the All-Japanese Pass with this site and they have thousands of videos in different niches. It's almost like a Japanese Videobox.
It's a good long-term join for 3 months. You just have to watch the rebill. It was double my join price. This site and network would be a good place to start a collection of Japanese porn. They cover nearly every niche possible.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This site and included network is my pick for most underrated site and network.
- Old Nanny has been around awhile and several of the included network sites have been too.
- There are 8 sites included if you count Old Nanny. I will list those in bottom line.
- Good download speeds at 80% my max download speed.
- Don’t underestimate these older ladies, or the younger ones.
- Smooth and easy navigation across the network.
Cons:
- Not all of the newest updates come with 4K, but if you’re like me, you’re still satisfied with the HD downloads and those are available. Some newer videos have 4K.
- I just think a lot of porn fans will either not like the older ladies or be able to enjoy the content based on their physical attraction. I’m getting old is what I’m trying to say.
Bottom Line:
I joined Old Nanny years ago. One of my attractions back then was the handjob content. Back then, handjob porn was hard to come by and no, I didn’t mean it that way. That is where Old Granny stands out and asserts itself. They not only have a large group of what I think are attractive older women but they have quite a few very talented older ladies.
This network starts with Old Nanny. You then receive these sites too, AgedLove, EuropeMature, FrenzyBDSM, LatinChill, OmaHotel, OmaHunter and USAWives. These bonus sites are mostly small sites. I’m not counting these small sites as a con just because Old Nanny is enough for a join.
One thing I like about this network is the alternating scenarios. They have older women with younger guys. Older women with young women. A lot of older with younger porn sites split the young guy and young women with older women, up into two different sites.
The navigation is smooth and easy simply because they kept it simple. There’s a dropdown box to switch to the other sites. I have been saying it for nearly two decades. Sites need to be simple. Networks need to be simple even more.
The updates are once a week, from what I can tell. I think that’s acceptable. The video quality consistency may bother some. The video downloads have either 4K as the biggest resolution or HD as the highest. There’s no rhyme or reason for this difference. Of the 8 newest updates, 3 have 4K, the other 5 have HD.
I believe the biggest strength of the network is the amount of models. They have the men mixed in with the women or I would give you an exact number of models. As it is, there are around 350 models including the men. I have not seen many older and younger sites with this many female models. I am surprised I like the models as much as I do. I have always liked models older than teens, but other than Anilos, I have not shown much interest in older women. This network changes that. I am paying more attention to the skill level and techniques of these older women. There are plenty of scenes with younger women in them too. That could be helping me enjoy the older women, but these older women show their experience and even expertise.
If you're even slightly interested, check out their model list and if you join, go through here at PU, the network has a good PU discount. You're not only going to see some believable scenes, but also are seeing a large collection of older, horny women. It's good, maybe not quite great, but that will be up to you to decide..
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A premier old/young site that’s been around as long as I’ve been reviewing porn.
- The site is large (see cons) and currently is sitting on scene 799.
- Navigation is clear and straightforward but it could be improved (see cons)
- Newest 125 or so scenes have 4K download option (see bottom line for full quality details).
- Downloadable photo sets and screenshots.
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max.
- Pretty and young female models.
Cons:
- It drives my OCD crazy when there aren’t dates on the scenes. There are none here but based on the last TBP review, it looks like they’ve added nearly 20 scenes in 2021, maybe 2 updates per month?
- The site has everything it needs in navigation but the way the scenes are laid out can make it a little frustrating. I will explain further in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I actually remember this site from my very first year on Porn Users. I think it was one of the only old/young sites back then. It’s hard to believe but I was in my 20s when I started reviewing on Porn Users. I am now about to hit 42. Back then, I had no interest in watching a bunch of old guys have sex with 18-24 year old women. There is more to this niche than meets the eye. Do the Transformers owe me royalty for that? What you have here is the tale of Beauty and the Beast meets porn. Very attractive young women having sex with this old guys that look like they are probably someone’s grandfather. One of the things I’ve noticed that Oldje advertises is Real Swallows and Kisses. There’s the more than meets the eye. I don’t think a porn site is pulling off anything special to talk a young woman into having sex with an older man for a paycheck. But, these scenes have a lot of touching, kissing and shows of affection and lust. You can buy lust. It’s not as easy to buy affection. The one time I joined this site before this time, I was impressed by the chemistry between the young women and older men.
To my surprise and let me add happiness, Oldje doesn’t stray from older man/younger woman. I’m still not too open to the younger men/older women niche. At least not on this big of an age difference. I don’t think I would enjoy watching an 18 year old guy have sex with a 67 year old woman. I’m reviewing porn, doesn’t that tell you I can be shallow?
My complaint about the layout should be furthered a little. They have the newest scene showing when you sign in and below it is one that isn’t numbered and says, “special”. That’s what happens when you number your scenes. That’s 799, then “special” scene just below it. Below special scene is scene 798. It may be OCD at work. I don’t know why those special scenes are in-between the numbered scenes. I don’t know if those are numbered elsewhere on the site or if they are bonus scenes. You can download them. Clicking the model’s name doesn’t help. It opens the models scenes up but no numbers on those. You all are starting to realize why I’ve been married 3 times.
Don’t let that take away from what is a very entertaining site in this niche. They have Gina Gershon in a gangbang with older men. I think you have to put yourself in the older men’s mindset, I’m going straight to hell for this, you know those older guys are looking at each other and saying, “I finally have a story to tell my adult grandchildren.” It does make it entertaining. These are not “stunt cocks”, this is one of the greatest moments of these men’s lives. It’s a fun site. Even if I’m not that into the older/younger niche. I can appreciate it more now than 14 years ago.
They also have very good quality. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080, 720 and 540 in the download options. There are downloadable photo sets and downloadable screenshots. It’s becoming pretty common to just accept that if we at least get pictures we should be happy. These pictures are 2000 long end. I’ve said it before, that’s better than no pictures. On the videos, I find the 720p plenty clear and crisp enough to download those. I’m go back into their older scenes, back when some of these young women were starting kindergarten. If the older guys performances don’t impress you, this will, every scene, unless I missed one, has at least 720p download. I don’t think you can ask for more than that from a site that has been around this long.
I didn’t list this as a con since it’s becoming so common. The site is a free-scroll site. Scroll, let more scenes load, scroll, let more scenes load. I know a few members have talked about not liking that. I don’t either but it’s not that bad.
If you’re into older and younger porn you definitely should check this site out and it comes with a couple other sites. They also have an Oldje threesome site. The tags seem to work well on this site. There’s not a lot to complain about. Unless you’re just turned off by the niche itself. There are threesomes on here with the old guy taking care of two younger women. I think porn like this is a nice break from stunt cocks, the same nearly violent hardcore scenes that we’re seeing in mainstream porn today. Much more impressed than I would have been when I was 28.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- They fooled me right off the bat, it’s one older guy with two young, hot women. I was expecting two old guys with one woman.
- Not a huge site but how many of us really expect to see an older guy satisfying two young women? There are 107 scenes and 159 female models.
- There are some really pretty models on this site. I don’t know these models but I’m impressed with them.
- Every video has 1080p, 720p and 540p downloads. No 4K.
- Download speeds are very good (80-85% of my max)
- Very simple site that shows why many sites too complicated. Navigation isn’t a problem at all.
Cons:
- If you like Oldje and want to see what this site is about, you have to join it separately and pay again.
- I’m guessing that some will say it’s too basic of a site. The pictures just look like screenshots to me.
- No dates on the scenes and I don’t know if it’s updating.
Bottom Line:
The scene that shows up first when I sign in was worth the membership. I don’t know who the model is. Her name is listed as Samantha Sparkle and she’s 19, from Hungary. She has all the qualities of a star. She’s also on the regular Oldje site. She’s one of those models that had the same initial response from me when I first saw Eve Angel or Anetta Keys. She not too curvy and built but she’s not too thin either. She has pretty hair, eyes and she has that classic female body. The other woman in the scene is Amy Douxxx. I’m not really into blondes but she’s attractive. The guy, my apoligies to him if I get this wrong. He looks at least 75. I’m being kind. He looks like my 86 year old uncle. I do believe he is very advanced in age. He doesn’t really do a lot. The women take turns riding on him. If that is turn-off to you, you won’t like this site. I think for me, my favorite niche is solo. I like to see the woman in action, moving her body and with these older guys not being able to do a lot, it lets the women really show what they can do. I don’t think I ever realized that’s why I don’t like most newer, mainstream hardcore. The guy takes up half the spotlight. These old guys don’t care about the spotlight. They have to beautiful, young, naked women and that’s all the spotlight they need.
The site isn’t big and I have not seen a new update posted. I don’t know if it’s updating. It does have 107 scenes on it. If you find a way to really enjoy this type of porn like I have, that’s 107 scenes that you’re going to want. Even the settings are realistic. It looks like the old guy’s house. It’s going to make me look further into this older/ younger niche. I’m starting to either understand what they’re going for or my imagination is working too well.
Some of the missing features on this site is there are tags but those tags are limited and you can only see the tags by going to a scene. There’s not a tab for tags like on Oldje. That, to me, can be an advantage. You don’t really need a tag box. It’s an older guy having sex with two hot, younger women. That lowers the importance of the navigation. The women do interact with each other too. It’s kind of like a lesbian friends stumbled up on an older man who found his bottle of Viagra. You get three download options on the videos. All the videos have 1080, 720, 540. It has pictures but it’s not setup like the other Oldje site. You can download those. You just have to scroll to the bottom of the page to find the download link to the pictures.
I’m going to mention they have some scenes that seem to be compilations of some sort. That’s just going to lead me right into saying I believe they should combine this site with the regular Oldje site. That’s what the compilations look like. It looks like they’ve taken the best segments from Oldje and made those into a compilation to put on this site. I believe I’ve realized the two women with the one older guy are there just as much to occupy each other. Check the models and see if you find any like I did that made it worth joining despite it being a smaller site. I do believe porn has flipped the script on the older/younger by having younger men with older women. I know of at least 10 sites that have something like, “Mom teaches sex” in the title. That makes these older men with younger women scenes more unique. It’s not as good overall as Oldje but it’s a nice addition.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good amount of hardcore and all content is high quality.
- 100% exclusive, great for collectors of the models they have (80 or so).
Cons:
- Really, it doesn't seem to have a lot of content on it. Though there are near 500 videos
- Pic sets couldn't be full sets, one had 6 pics in it
- As with most sites, especially newer ones, there are some navigation problems
Bottom Line:
I had read where another member on PU had problems with the price being higher than expected. I almost ended up in the same group with him. When you register, it gives you the price options. I clicked $19.99, when I clicked "join" it just reloaded the same page. I hadn't typed in any payment information. I noticed that the price option was now marked, "$89.99 for multi-month access". I closed the browser, was using Firefox and opened Internet Explorer 7, this time when I clicked the $19.99 it went straight to CCbill and let me join.
So be careful when joining. Those price buttons reset themselves when using Firefox, not for sure about Opera. I had a similar problem on one of the DVD sites with Firefox not working right with it.
The site itself is very good. It looks like a startup company similar to the 21st Sextury sites that is just getting going. I may be wrong on that though. There are around 80 models and most have 4-5 videos each. The content is high quality and it is exclusive, so if you collect any of the Euro models, it is worth a one month pass. It also some pretty great/realistic hardcore on it. Which is my biggest problem with b/g hardcore, most of it looks way beyond staged. On only3x it looks more believable though.
They do have Eve Angel for you collectors of one of the most perfect natural women in the world. I like it so far, have been a member for 2 weeks. I recommened it, especially for Euro fans. Otherwise, it needs more models.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The greatest tease and clothing/hose/panties network on the internet.
- Forget that daily update, they update 5-6 times a day with photosets and videos.
- While some models may not be as known, there are others that are only known for their nude porn work like Natalia Forrest. All the models have at least above average attractiveness.
- You receive 8 sites with the Only All Sites pass. I will explain them in the bottom line.
- The numbers tell a lot of the story: With 8,600 videos and over 24,000 photosets. All downloadable, all unlimited as far as I know.
- Fast downloads (between 80-90% my max)
- CCBill is the biller.
Cons:
- It’s a porn network that’s not really porn like most porn is. It’s a basic concept that will definitely get lost on some.
- As much as I love tease the love of tease is based on the thinking that more will come from the tease. Not a new woman starting over on tease. It’s hard to find faults with this network.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of sad that the biggest con for this network is that some people won’t even try it. The word softcore is in the description. I do understand people’s problem with that. My second con tells it. I love tease but I imagine if I wasn’t getting something more than tease, I would probably tell the woman I was going to buy her a special present and give her an empty ring box. Yeah, not funny, huh?
I do think today’s porn has made tease porn better for me. Today’s porn just skips so many important parts of porn for me. I want to see the woman’s body in clothes. I want to see her take those clothes off for me to watch. Tease porn really works for me. My mind tells me, “Okay, if I was there, this is what would happen next.” That’s going to be a problem for some.
The sites you receive are: Only Tease, Only Opaques, Only Secretaries, Only Silk and Satin, Only Costumes, Only Sportswear, Only Carla and Only Melanie. I’ll start with the obvious, Only Melanie and Only Carla are not selling points to this network. Those are small solo type sites of two very popular Only All models. Five of the other six are fetish-specific sites. You have opaques which are light colored (usually see through) hose, secretaries that’s just business dress clothes with upskirts and bendovers and downblouses, they keep creating words my spellchecker does not recognize. Silk and Satin is lacy panties and more see through. Costumes is self-explanatory. Sportswear is leggings and shorts with upshorts and more bendovers. These sites play as much to your eyes and brains and other parts interest in what you see women wearing everyday than just to the specific model. That’s layered porn. She may not be a 10 but her bendover is. It helps that all these women are above average looking. Many of them are top-tier.
They don’t cut back on quality either. The newer videos have 4K, 1080p, 720p but those are going to be hard-pressed to pass the pictures. Pictures let you focus on the upskirt, the downblouse, the bendovers, the model isn’t moving in a picture. All you have to do, if old enough, is think back to VHS and DVD days. When every young man’s DVD or VCR player had a stuck pause button. That’s why pictures work best in this genre. What you are wanting to see may only be visible for 8 seconds in real time. Having the pictures that never change lets you take a good look and inspect what you’re looking at.
The videos and photos are downloadable and no limits. The updates schedule is one of the biggest I have ever seen with 4-6 photosets and videos per day. The quality is very high. It does lack a little bit of heat or fire if you want to call it that. A lot of the models seem to be true amateurs to me. You can tell they’re getting used to being a model. That is the one legitimate concern. The content itself is not really presented as porn as much as tease and very little in the content will make you think of porn.
It doesn’t bother me since my favorite part of porn is usually the part others fast-forward through. Considering the size of the network, the navigation is very good and that could be because of my experience on the site. You will develop favorites in the models even if you don’t know them by name. That is an old favorite of porn collectors. Finding models that are not on any other site. They have quite a bit of those on this network. It’s one of the few networks that I know of that the updates give you something to look forward to. You keep waiting for that obscure favorite model to return.
It's one of my favorite networks and a lot of that is because I used to join several of these sites as standalone sites. The biggest complaint about the price is probably the biggest compliment I could give them. It’s very rare to find a year offer for the network. It’s not cheap nor should it be. It’s $35 a month with the TBP/PU promo and they offer a 2 month membership for $59.95. I do get the feeling there’s not much room for them to lower the price. I can pull up receipts from joining, especially, Only Tease, for $29.95 a month. Just for it. These sites would cost you roughly $180-$200 to join all of them separate. That’s how a network should be in my opinion. It just so happens to be they also make some of my favorite niches. Great network that just keeps moving ahead.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The ultimate package of high quality tease sites.
- Each site in this network can be joined individually, they cost $24.95 each or you can get them all in this network for $34.95.
- You get Only Tease, Only Secretaries, Only Silk and Satin, Only Opaques, Only Sportswear and Only Costumes, with the All Only Network.
- CCBill is the biller.
- In general, all of the sites do a good job of sticking to their niche, they could get away with doing a lot less with the believable settings, outfits/costumes but you do get the feeling they try hard to make this content as believable as possible.
- The network averages 6-8 updates per day, most are photosets but today's updates, as example, included 2 videos.
- You might discover some new clothing fetishes. I didn't realize how much I like opaques.
- It's always the problem you will run into on tease sites. There is always one or two models you want to see fully nude!
Cons:
- They really need a network hub. I have signed in multiple times and it always signs in to Only Tease, then you have to navigate to the other sites using the tabs. Sounds minimal and it kind of is. There's really not much to complain about here.
- This one irritates me a little. They also have a site called VIP Only Tease. You do not get it. You have to be a member for 3 or 4 straight months to access it. Several of the sets I was interested in are on VIP Only Tease. It's business, I understand that but when I pay $35 for a network I don't expect to find out I am not getting all the content. The thing is, there is so much content, it's not like you're going to notice it not being there.
Bottom Line:
(Edit 1/21/2020)Dropped 4 points for slowing update schedule
When I join most sites these days one of the things I want to see is that the model does not start out nude. The Only All Network is the opposite of that. The models very rarely end up nude.
I think these types of sites are for those that see themselves as people-watchers. My ex-wife used to say I looked at strangers butts more than hers. It was such a joke that she would even say, "Stop looking at her butt." I blame growing up in Los Angeles. You couldn't help but look. What they do on these sites is the focus on whatever the title of the site is. Only Tease is going to feature models "accidentally" dropping something in the office and bending over in a short skirt to pick it up. Opaques has sets like a nurse or anyone that would wear stockings/hose. They are picking up something. Bending over a bed.
It is trying to replicate something you might have seen that day or ten years ago. Only Secretaries is the one I think a lot of guys have. You see the pretty receptionist at your doctor or even in your office. She oopsies and drops a paper clip and has to pick it up. You get the bending over to get something from the filing cabinet. The Silk and Satin is self-explanatory. It is not that different than the others. The models usually are wearing a silky dress shirt and pants, a common office outfit. They make sure to give you plenty of upskirts.
The Only Sportswear content should have been either my favorite or second favorite but it's one of my least favorites. Some of the sets are really good and others are just not bad but they are kind of dull. I wonder if the whole "I am working out" makes it less seductive as say the secretaries. The last one is Only Costumes and it can be a little strange. I don't know what some of these costumes are. One of the newer ones, I guess she is supposed to be Little Bo Peep or maybe it is Raggedy Ann?
I think when you look at costumes you had to figure they would run out. Nurse, policewoman, EMS, cheerleaders, there's just not a lot of regular costume choices. An example from the newer scenes is the model is a lifeguard but they need her shirt to tell you that or else you would think it's a cute woman in shorts and a t-shirt.
The last thing I would want to do is criticize their choices. One of the few porn sites that really has to focus on pre-nudity. I am just glad somebody does it.
The videos on here are better than most tease, low sexual stimulation and have plenty of sexual simulation. Models in skirts with hose, on all fours, grinding their butt back at you. There is enough to say it is not just a tease site. You will have to bring some imagination but I'm not for sure what you would imagine if a woman in hose and thong was grinding her butt at you! The videos are in 1080p but they are usually short in relative terms to the average porn scene, usually less than 10 minutes each.
The photos are the big selling point. These sets range from 120-150 photos each. They capture every possible angle and fantasy you have about your college intern secretary fetching files for you. How lucky could you be when she has to lay down on the floor to get the paperclip that slid under the filing cabinet, causing her legs to open with her little short skirt on.
I know these sites won't appeal to a lot of porn fans. It is the type of porn I have started to favor. I like to think a little when I am looking at porn and trying to come up with a scenario where it could really happen.
Something this network has that nearly all porn sites have is a tagging system. The difference being, the one on Only All network works! Each set you look at gives you the options you see in that set. Meaning if the model has on Ankle Strap Heels, it will be in your tag margin and you can find all other sets with Ankle Strap Heels. I don't even know what half of it is! What is a pencil skirt? They also have the tags like "Nudity level: Topless". You click it and you get all the sets with topless models.
To show you how specific these tags are, I just saw one for, "Underwear: cotton panties (fullback)". If you do not have clothing fetishes when you join this site, you will develop some and being able to directly click on all sets showing that specific fetish is as far as I know unheard of. I haven't seen a site that does so much with their navigation. The set I took that one from has 12 tags in it. Including the foot fetishist ones like "Shoes come off" tag.
It's just not likely that you're going find a site with this much teasing, the unmatched navigation, the high quality (pictures can be up to 6000 long end) and with more than 5 updates per day.
I put this together based on May 2019. They had 220 photo sets just in May 2019. They had 33 videos in May 2019. That's 253 updates in one month. As crazy as that sounds, their sets go back to June 2002. I wouldn't try to come up with a total number of content. It very much earns a 98.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the best blowjob site on the internet.
- Huge site for such a specific niche (1767 scenes)
- Everything DDF records is high quality and that is in both technical and performances.
- 945 models
- Currently is updating twice a month.
- Very good tagging system that is as accurate as you can ask for one a network and site this large.
- Photo sets that include the models fully clothed and posing, they are downloadable as zips.
- Easy signup and cancellation through Vendo.
- Includes access to the DDF Network, but can be joined by itself as well.
- Covers multiple clothing niches including some women leaving part of their clothes on, some fully nude, others in their underwear.
Cons:
- The common one with a specific niche, the scenes can become repetitive.
Bottom Line:
I'm usually not into blowjob sites. Only Blowjob is an exception. First, you have the top-tier models that DDF brings in. Second, you get the DDF high quality photos and videos. Third, those clothing fetishes and how believable the women are at making you believe they love giving blowjobs. Some of these women look like they're french kissing the dick.
The numbers are there: 1767 scenes, those include a video and photo set with each.
The amount of models on a specific niche site is unheard of for me, nearing 1,000.
The technical quality includes photos that are 2000 long end with zip file downloads. The videos have included 4K option since January 2017, there are also 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p.
Their streaming videos now have a "skip to action" feature that let's you jump to "ball licking", "masturbation", "handjob", "cumshot" as a few of the examples.
Something I've always believed they do as good as anyone is varying the cumshot. There are facials, in the mouth, on the boobs, on the ass and they do have scenes that venture outside of only blowjob and slip some sex in. I like the variation. It makes it more believable that the blowjob led to more.
You can join this site by itself, usually for $5 to $10 cheaper than the whole DDF Network costs but if you catch the whole network on sale it's easily a better deal.
There are also multiple scenarios here despite it being a blowjob site. There are male/male/female, male/female/female as well as one on one.
There's very little to complain about. I would score it higher if I was really into blowjobs. The women are mostly European. They make good eye contact with both the camera and the guy and their moans sound very realistic and not faked.
The older scenes don't have the "skip to action" feature on them and are not as high of quality but that's to be expected.
I would recommend the network to anyone and if you're a blowjob lover you definitely should try this site out.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very niche site from a top network. If you like seeing pretty women give a variety of blowjobs, messy, deepthroat, facials, partially clothed, all-nude, then you'll probably enjoy this site a lot.
- Includes access to the stellar DDF Network, but did used to be a successful, standalone site.
- Updates a little more than weekly, at least at the current time, averaging 5 updates per month.
- Each update comes with a video and photo set.
- Video can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and photos are zipped for downloading.
- Download speeds are above average (for porn sites), I'm downloading at 80% of my max speed.
- I've heard that women can watch these videos and improve their own oral-giving capability.
- Navigation is good, mostly straightforward for the site and network overall, but will say I always have trouble finding the pictures. It's because you just scroll down from the video.
- Network as a whole is an excellent value.
Cons:
- This might be the goofiest con I've ever listed -- I keep waiting for more than the blowjob to happen.
- Could say this on nearly all sites, could use more variety in model-type.
- Probably the closest I'll come to a real con, this type of content can become very boring and repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Only Blowjob is one of the few DDF sites I hadn't been a member of before the DDF Network. It's not so much that I dislike blowjobs, as it is, that I usually want to see more than just the blowjob. As a matter of fact, when I'm watching most porn videos, I skip the blowjob part.
I made a claim in the pros of this site can help women (or men) with their oral skills. I can tell you that. I'll leave it alone at that, but try having your significant other to watch a few and you'll see the difference.
Which is what at least helps this site stand out. You get the feeling the female models are very much into giving blowjobs. Might not sound like much, but you do see it. From techniques they use to moans from being turned on themselves. Another part I like about the site is most of the videos at least start with some teasing. There's a sensuality to the scenes that most porn rarely shows these days.
The amount of content also helps OnlyBlowjob. Almost goes into hard to believe numbers.
As of 4/3/2017: 1,647 full videos
The videos have been at minimum 720p since 2011 and all current scenes are 1080p with some being 4k and others being virtual reality. There doesn't seem to be any logical flow of when they release 4k or VR.
And to my surprise, the zipped high quality format on the pictures are 4000 long end.
I do think the niche limits the appeal of this site. I've always been drawn away from this site by the other DDF sites on the network, but was glad I checked it out this time. And it's not as formulaic as I remembered it being. There's scenes with two guys and one girl. There's scenes that bring footjobs in and there's scenes that take advantage of the bustier models large boobs.
The navigation is easy to use, but sometimes the actions listed can be wrong. Each scene has a list of actions in the video, like: Titty-fucking, cum on tits, cum in mouth, facial, masturbation, and so on. Some of those are marked on some videos, but when you watch them you won't see the action, but that's a minor complaint, not even really worth of a con.
I don't know if DDF still does this or not, but used to, some of these Only Blowjob scenes were just the blowjob section cut out of a hardcore scene. You could then look on the other DDF sites and find the whole scene. While that seemed like a rip-off, it actually changes since these Only Blowjob videos are usually right around 20 minutes long. So there's teasing you wouldn't see in the hardcore full-sex version of the scene.
That's the strength of the site. While, like me, you might think just a blowjob scene isn't really enough, you'll see that there's more to these scenes than just a blowjob. The network also comes into play since you have access to much different niches that break the monotony. It's a good site overall and one that helps the DDF Network be one of the top networks available.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- DDF site that had slid under my radar, high quality as expected from Denys.
- A lot more content than I expected
- Picture quality is similar to the other DDF sites, the newer content is in the 2000 high end range, older is not as good, but all come in zips.
- Video quality it also similar to the other DDF sites, the newer content is HD 1280 high end, the older content can go as low as what looks to be in the 300s high end. I can't get the properties to tell me what the resolution on those are, but it is small.
- Site runs fast and download speeds are above average.
- Really interesting because some of these sets seem to be from hardcore sets that I have seen and these sets are the parts I never saw in the hardcore one!
Cons:
- I hate to say it because I know DDF works really hard on the quality of content and on the quality of models, but the price is too high to join more than once per year, $35.
- Older videos are split into pieces, which is also similar to the other DDF sites.
- The nitpicking one, all blowjobs all the time, gets repetitive, which I knew before joining, but I wanted to see if there was any sets of my favorite models.
Bottom Line:
I'm a fan of all of DDFs sites that I have been a member of, though I don't think any of them are quite in the range of 1byday, his flagship site, and one of my favorite sites.
If you've been on DDF's sites, you know how this site works. Nice navigation, everything is neat and organized, all the links work, download speed is good and usually within 1 kb difference from file to file for an impressive consistency that you don't find on most sites.
Most of the 1byday models are here in some capacity. There is a really interesting/rare one of Aneta Keys giving a blowjob that is worth mentioning for collectors.
The positives for this site include that chance of finding a Euro model giving a blowjob that you have never seen give one, the high quality pictures and videos, and maybe most of all, the ease of using the site and customer service that is very helpful and fast with replies.
The downside continues to be the price. I will pay $35 for 1byday without a complaint now that they are updating twice a day. But I just can't see joining a niche site, that has a niche that I'm not even that much into, so if you're not into blowjobs, this might not be for you, if you are, it is probably the best blowjob site on the internet.
DDF doesn't let any low quality content through.
As far as I can tell, each picture set has a video set as well, and those are not vidcaps. They are studio shot picture sets in zips. These days I find myself giving points to sites just for including zip sets.
Your video options include divx, wmv, mpeg, stream, so there is an option for everyone to like.
Like other DDF sites, you really can't go wrong with them as long as you have the money to pay this much for a site. I recommend it, but still prefer 1byday to it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Talk about a surprise site, around 1,200 pic/videos sets, and some of the best known Euro models
- TBP discount price of $19.95
- Pictures are up to 2,000 on high end and are in zip files
- Newer movies are 1280 high end, HD quality
- Close to 70% of the videos are solo, the other 30% are a close blend of b/g hardcore and g/g sex.
- Navigation works just fine, model names are slightly different than some sites, but by now, I have figured out all of the other names.
- Download speeds for me are slightly above average
- Also comes with bonus site Hannah's Honeypot, which is a pretty good site if you are into really innocent, skinny blondes.
Cons:
- Had trouble using a download manager on this site, but also have trouble on Sapphic Erotica, another site they own as well.
- Some of the content has that "Been there, done that" feel to it. Very planned out scenes.
- This probably isn't a con but the g/g sets will make you automatically think of Sapphic Erotica's newer scenes.
Bottom Line:
I joined this after re-joining Sapphic Erotica for probably the 10th time in the last several years. They were advertising this site Only Cuties and I had noticed in Sapphic Erotica's descriptions it would say, "Can also be seen on Only Cuties". So I took a shot.
The lower price always helps when going into a site that I knew very little about. I was surprised to see a nice blend of solo, hardcore and girl/girl videos. The updates are also very good with a picture set and a video set each day.
Navigation is similar to Sapphic Erotica, probably should say a little better than Sapphic Erotica. The models are mostly mid-level to top tier Euro models, which means very good.
The quality is a selling point with HD videos on the newer clips, even the older clips are not bad, again, if you have been on Sapphic Erotica, you know that their older videos are not bad either.
The pictures are pretty nice quality, 2000 being the highest option, there are three options, just like on Sapphic Erotica. I did run into a few slow downloads when downloading the pictures, but it wasn't very often.
I guess you could complain that there should be more boy/girl or even girl/girl content, but that isn't a very big complaint and it would be no reason to take points away.
I liked the site good enough to let it rebill for a month, those damn daily updates had me wondering if I was going to miss anything if I left the site. That is a good thing. Highly recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best tease sites on the internet. Also can be accessed through the Only All network.
- I think most of the models are amateurs but I do not guarantee it. I am rarely familiar with models on these sites.
- The people that run this site know what they are doing and they do these niches as good as anyone.
- The videos are better than I would normally expect from a tease site.
- The photos are very high quality, nearing 6000 long end and they have a nice flow to their sets, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are fast (90% of max)
- CCBill is the biller.
- The Only All network is a must join at least once for those that like softcore content.
- Clean site layout, one small ad at the bottom of the pages.
- Three updates per day, three photo sets one day, two photo sets and a video the next.
- Nearly 1,000 models on Only Tease.
Cons:
- Navigation could be better. Will explain in BL.
- The sites live up to their names, there are some known hardcore models on here like Zafira, she shows a little more than other models but it is still "tease". Not a problem for me but could be for others.
Bottom Line:
I have a review of Only Tease here on Porn Users from 2008. Back then, I don't remember them having a full network like now. I will also review the network separately.
The navigation is my only real complaint. I was trying to put together a count of the models and noticed it isn't as easy to do as I expected. In the model list, you can select each letter of the alphabet, it lists all the models of that letter. This is a common problem with large sites. If you do not know who you are looking for you are going to have a lot of clicking to do. This part takes on an even worse twist. I don't know how you could fix that problem. I was always told you can't complain about something unless you know how to fix it. There also is the compliment of this con. It was the only complaint I had.
Sites like these are rare. They do what they are supposed to do and you will rarely see a set that breaks their system or flow. I talked about the flow of their photo sets. The first 30 photos are usually not sexually provocative. They can make them seem to be by focusing on the model's butt or boobs but they are fully dressed and doing daily tasks. It is like people watching. The next 30 show the model being more "aware" that you are looking at her. She will give you a little extra bend across the desk or counter or chair. The next 30 the clothes start to come unbuttoned and so on. There are sets that show everything but not in a wide open spread way.
Almost all sets, at the very least, end with the model topless and in her panties/hose. The interest for me is often the first 60 pictures. There's a voyeuristic nature to those. Like when you go to the bank to get a loan and find yourself checking the loan officer out.
The quality of the photos is about as high as you find. You also will get roughly 130 photos per set. Only Tease is a little different than the other Only All sites because it is not a specific type of clothes/outfit/costume. You could say it is like a compilation of all the Only All sites.
Sites like these usually leave a lot to be desired in the videos but Only Tease's videos are better than most art/tease videos. They are usually sexually provocative. A lot of artsy sites just have the model standing around naked or teasing. Only tease goes more into the bending over, on all fours (in clothes often).
One thing you will realize with Only Tease and the Only All sites in general is there are models that are made for this type of "porn". You can even see it in the number of sets they have of certain models. Porchia W is one of those made for this type of porn. She has 119 photo sets, 24 videos that's a total of almost 12,000 pictures just of her. One of my favorites is Amelie, she only has 6 photo sets and 2 videos. Nearly all models have multiple sets and just glancing over the models I would say more than 50 have at least 20 sets.
This is one of those sites that should brag about their numbers! The site is also nice and clean with one little banner ad at the bottom. They also have features to make using their site more customized. You can click on any photo set "add to customized set". A box shows up on each picture. You click the pictures you want to put in your set. It's a very in-depth feature that photo collectors like to see. I would also think fetishists that maybe just like upskirts with (color) panties.
Those are the people a site like this appeals to. While a site like Kink appeals to your nude fetishes, penetration fetishes, a site like Only Tease appeals to your clothing, daily situation fetishes.
It is an example of how experience pays off. You just one see much on here that makes you think "what were they thinking?" The models are nearly all attractive in a "she could work in my office" kind of way. The only sets I do not like that much on Only Tease are the bedroom ones. Having it in the bedroom, a private room, takes away the "oh she is getting my file out of the cabinet". I am mostly saying once in the privacy of a bedroom our minds change about what we are looking at.
It still is an excellent site. You can still join these Only All sites as standalone sites for $24.95 each or you can join the entire network for $34.95 thanks to the TBP/PU price.
Overall, you can build an entire porn photo collection with Only Tease or the network. And also have yourself a nice collection of tease based videos. Recommended for those that like panties, hose, downblouse, upskirt, believable office and tease content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Joined this for something new and different, ended up very happy I did
- Pictures are 2000+ on high end
- Videos are better quality for the XVID format than WMV and are 640 high end
- You will get your fetishes filled here, pantyhose, panties, upskirts, high heels, office girls, hair pulled up with glasses, well those are at least some of my fetishes that this site fills!
- Price is not bad considering the amount of high quality pictures
- Pics are downloadable in zips and the speed is very good
- One word fellas, Gemma! Look her up if you haven't seen her, I am pretty sure I now have a new fetish called, Gemma!
Cons:
- Well, they don't get all the way naked! Take that as a con that is really a pro because some of these models nearly make me beg to be fully nude. On a side note, I didn't expect full nudity, though there is some, but very little sexual contact.
- Navigation has a few problems, I kept closing the site when closing a picture.
- I really don't see me keeping the videos, but I will keep all of the pictures
- Something I always note on these fetish type sites, it can become repetitive as most of the sets are similar
Bottom Line:
My first exposure to this site was from an ad on twistys, that is when I clicked the preview and I saw Gemma Massey. I literally threw my credit card at my computer! What a beautiful woman she is.
I have seen Gemma before on M&B, but never like this. Most of the models on here are making great eye contact with the camera, very seductive, which is a good thing, the only thing is, you will be wanting to see more! Some of the models on here do go completely nude, while others go topless, but you won't see any sexual positions in full nudity.
I was okay with this. I love the office girl look and this site has tons of office girl content. I would like to see them put glasses on more of the models, but hey, that is just me. I always had that fetish of the sweet girl peeking over her glasses with her legs crossed, nice short skirt and thigh high hose and there goes my credit card again!
I think this site is doing a great job as far as staying within their niche. It is definitely more for the picture lovers than the movie lovers.
The quality of pictures is very good, 2000+ on high end, good fast downloads on the zips, but as noted, the movies did very little for me.
I like being teased in pictures, but not in videos. Pictures have a voyeuristic way about them, which works with the tease. Overall, I recommend it to anyone who likes that classy look in women, that has any fetish that has to do with hose, skirts, panties, because they deliver on these fetishes!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A once very expensive network that has lowered its price to a very good level, used to be 35 Euros to join, so it was around $50 for U.S. members. Now is $24.95.
- Has 3 major sites, Party Hardcore, Mad Sex Party and Drunk Sex Orgy plus 14 other niche heavy sites like Fully Clothed Sex and Fully Clothed Pissing.
- Newer videos are 1280x720 with 5000 bitrates. Each update also has zipped photos.
- Some of these orgies have probably close to 100 people in them.
- Updates weekly on each of the sites that I've tried out.
- Most of the sites have in excess of 200 sets of videos/photos.
- I haven't had any blazing download speeds, but am hitting my average.
- A different view of porn. You're going to see some women that may be a little bigger, a little less hot as you are used to and nearly every video has at least one that really stands out. This can be a con as well.
Cons:
- Things get a bit hectic at times, usually right when you've spotted the hottest woman at the party bent across a bar. Camera cuts to the women you wished was hiding behind the bar.
- Though Party Hardcore is going for the authentic feel, the damn music gets on my nerves. In one scene, really hot girl getting hammered and the old classic song, "Big Girls Don't Cry" is blasting in the background.
- If not careful, you'll find yourself fast forwarding a lot, rewinding a lot and trying to tell people to move out of the way.
Bottom Line:
Party Hardcore to me is the flagship site here. I think women like the site. My wife does and was the one who got me to join a few years ago for nearly $50, the price cutback is 50% off to $25.
The basic story of Party Hardcore is a group of women rent this club, male strippers come out, dance around and tease the women until the women lose control and an all-out orgy breaks out. It's different, at times, very frustrating, at times very good. The other two named in the pros work similar. Drunken party turns into orgy. If nothing else, I want to say this is probably the best orgy content I've seen. It's still frustrating, but if you're into the voyeur/exhibitionist side of porn, this could be your holy grail.
One complaint my wife had with it is that the guys are not really much more than average size. I'll defend the guys by saying they each seem to get a couple women off in each video.
The other sites add a whole new dimension. There is one, Tyrannized, that is some pretty extreme content. Women dominating men, spanking, violent spanking until the man's butt cheeks bleed. Not my thing, don't want to give my wife any ideas! All WAM is a fun site, I had to look up the definition the last time we were on this network. It means Wet And Messy, you get some oil wrestling, some food fighting, just anything to make a mess with naked women. It's different and kind of goofy. I will say it is fun to watch.
I like the Fully Clothed Sex, I think all of us remember the days of trying to get a little in high school and sliding the panties/shorts over. Not into pissing content, Fully Clothed Pissing, but have to say models pissing with jeans on is interesting if nothing else. There are two other pissing sites as well, so if you're into that, there is more value. There are three cum sites, including a Transexual one. As you can see, there is a lot of coverage here.
The network itself works as good as any network I've been on. All sites are listed at the top of the page and require only a click to switch from site to site. For me, the value was the 3 orgy sites.
Minimal complaints, as with nearly all porn sites that have been around while, the older content is better. It is not quite as high technical quality though so you're running into that technical quality or on-screen quality problem. I would drop the music and let the dozens of moans and groans fill the air. Some of the earlier ones have a more believable, not staged, feel to them. Like one of the oldest has a woman who is genuinely blushing in it, by the end, she has taken 3 cumshots. It gave the impression it really was a bachelorette party and she was the bride to be.
Probably not for the guy who doesn't like his wife/spouse going out. They used to advertise these orgy sites as, "You may see your wife or girlfriend getting plowed".
An impressive network with a much more acceptable price. Recommended highly for those into these niches or looking for something different!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- A full network review, has 12 sites, every fetish you can imagine is here!
- Videos on the sites are 640 on high end and for the most part are very good and there are lots of videos up
- Pictures are available on each of the sites, some run a little below 1200, others towards 1500, but all do come in zips and most sets are huge!
- Most of the sites have some really beautiful women on them
- Definitely an original network, it is unlike any network you can join
Cons:
- Price for the entire network is around $55 for a month.
- We complain about the overuse of female models, well, these sites have about 12 guys that cover all of them from what I can see
- As with any fetish site, the content will always be repetitive after a while.
- The language is not one of 4 that I speak or understand, kind of hurts the content since I didn't get some of the fetishes, with no talking, I am lost
Bottom Line:
The score for the whole network is definitely a sum of it. Overall, the network delivers tons of fetish content. The only thing I didn't find was the really obscure fetishes like Roman Showers, which would have pissed me off if I had paid for to see!
The other sites beside the 3 top ones I reviewed separately are your typical fetishes, peeing, cumshots, 3 separate orgy sites and then the ones I ended up liking the most, the clothed sex sites. This was a whole new fetish to me. Men and women, having sex, fully clothed. I found it interesting and even erotic. What you end up with is a site that reminds you of those high school sneak overs to your girlfriend's house. She slides her shorts over, you unzip your pants and you get the picture. It also makes for a messy situation since half the time the guy cums on the woman's clothes.
Which I hear is also a fetish. This site makes me look at many things differently, I now think everyone has a closet full of fetishes!
Overall, as a network, it delivers what it promises. You get some hardcore sex with the orgy sites, you get fetish, it really is a quality network. The price is still a problem for me. I can join 2-3 sites for the price of this network. Several of these separate sites could be combined, like the orgy sites and the two cumshot sites.
I'm going to recommend the entire network only, and only if you don't mind paying the high price. It has a great preview with trailers as well. For me, one month was enough.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large collection of Outdoor Japanese porn scenes.
- 160 models and includes a model list which helps if you're not familiar with Japanese models.
- It says 506 scenes which is less than it had when TBP last reviewed it but it's not uncommon for these public/exhibitionism scenes to get removed.
- Mixture of quality, these are from DVDs, I think and you'll find some that are 720x420, some that are HD, it's a niche I'm interested in enough that I don't mind as much about the quality.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Good PU/TBP discount
- Includes access to All-Japanese Network
- Vendo is the biller
- Now has downloads of screencaptures in zips
- Navigation works well
Cons:
- Weird camerawork. Will explain in BL.
- Mosaics if you don't like the censoring, it is censored but I like the creativity it forces.
- No streaming unless it's because of my browser. I don't stream but thought I would mention it.
Bottom Line:
I like Japanese and most Asian models and my favorite niche in porn is exhibitionism. It's no surprise I like the combination.
I considered putting this in the pros but think it needs more explanation. This is legitimate exhibitionism. They do a good job of finding locations that while in public and while you can see life going on in the distance, they're having sex right in public. It's well thought out and planned. You can tell they know when an area isn't going to have many people if any in direct view. One of the scenes, a male and female are having sex right on a platform that looks like somewhere tourists would stand.
Besides that really positive paragraph, I'll mention the weird camerawork. Face, mosaic, face, boobs, mosaic, face in about 12 seconds. It reminds me a little of those old Japanese action shows. It's almost like stop motion. This isn't in all scenes but it's in enough that I noticed it.
The content is censored. One of my favorite parts of censored Japanese porn is when the boobs become exposed. I had never been into boobs until I started watching Japanese censored porn. It's like the moment the censorship angels sing. They have full boobs showing in most of these. There is a good variance as well. It's not just Male/Female having sex in public.
There is costume teasing, masturbation, threesomes, blowjobs, handjobs, some are at a beach.
I know how rare exhibitionism porn is so I am going easy on the video quality. If this site had 720p on every scene, I would have scored it higher.
I also mentioned the downloadable photos/screencaps since it looks like when TBP last reviewed this specific site they listed no downloads on the photos/screencaps. They do have them now and they are mixed in with the video downloads. Photos are almost as important as videos in exhibitionism porn. There's only so much that can be caught with moving video.
The navigation works how it should. It only gives you categories and models from this site instead of the whole network. It's something American networks need to take notes on.
I do think this site is more of a catered to site and could bring very subjective opinions. Fans of exhibitionism are likely going to like it a lot. If the exhibitionism part doesn't do it for you, it's a lot like a regular porn site.
They have 506 scenes listed and anyone that follows exhibitionism knows that's a lot. The TBP review had nearly 700 but there's more discrepancies. The highest download resolution listed on TBP is 700x400, it's 720x420, but there are also quite a few HD scenes. Those are even marked with an HD button on them. Something has changed over the years. Each of the 506 scenes also have downloadable pictures.
It's worth mentioning for those into exhibitionism, the network also has two other sites that has flashing and exhibitionism and my feeling is the same there as with this site. It's going to bring subjective opinions on how risky it is (not that risky). It's still about as close as we are getting to exhibitionism porn these days which I think is even more rare in Japan.
Recommending it is hard. The mosaic will turn a lot against it. If that doesn't bother you and you like to see people having sex and the above listed niches in public places you might like it as well as I do or even better than I do.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
