Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
1
|
1 By Day
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
01-20-08 08:05am
|
Review
2
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Large library of videos/photos
+ Covers many porn niches/genres
+ Has several options to browse and filter content
+ About three updates a week. All updates include video and photos
+ Video offered in various sizes. For the newer updates there are four options starting from 1920x1080 down to 512x288 for mobile devices.There are fewer options for the older videos
+ Videos can be streamed or downloaded. |
Cons: |
- The Web site is a little dated. Using from a PC, the thumbnails are on the small side.
- The streaming video is a little clunky. You hit the play arrow once to load and again to play. The video sometimes freezes when using the slider.
- HD video is offered and looks fine but the quality is not great considering the size of the files. (i.e. colors on dull side, not super crisp.)
- Video quality degrades quickly from 2013 and back.
- Some non-exclusive content
- 30 sites included with membership. Only about 6 are currently being updated. |
Bottom Line: |
This is a strong site in the young adult/Euro girls market. There's plenty of content to choose from and download speeds are decent. The site navigation and options to browse content are good.
On the flip side the site is not up to modern Web standards. (On a PC screen anyway.) If I'm looking at a 24" screen I expect to see good detail in the video thumbnails. It's also annoying not have a frame from the video presented when you click a thumbnail. |
|
11-11-15 04:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+Large library of videos/photos
+ Strikingly beautiful women in the young adult/Euro category.
+ HD quality video, back to 201l. (From what I've downloaded.) New videos are 1920x1080. 2011-13 are 1280x720.
+ Great camera work/editing. (From my consumer perspective.)
+ Great Web site. Easy to use, quick, and responsive design.
+ Daily updates |
Cons: |
- A bit pricey at $29.95 a month, but worth it.
- Possibly a bit monotonous if you prefer more kink and variety in your porn. |
Bottom Line: |
I've been a periodic customer of the Diesel Access sites for years now. At times, they've been a bit frustrating with the changes they've made to their sites and network. Things have come around and they have a superior product in 18 Only girls. (And the Wow sites!)
18 Only Girls is a joy to browse. If you've never been a member there are years of high resolution video and photo updates to enjoy. I join at least once a year. With the daily updates there's still plenty of new porn to explore. |
|
11-11-15 04:38pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
4
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Good amount of content -- if you sign up for the individual site or the network
+ 720p HD video
+ Great photography in the galleries.
+ Beautiful Euro babes
+ Good site navigation |
Cons: |
- Difficult to search/browse across network sites.
- Only a few of the network sites regularly updating
- Not much variety across the sites -- pretty much the Euro teen theme across the board.
- Expensive. Access to the network is $34.97
- Some updates not indicated on umbrella site (Diesel Access) |
Bottom Line: |
I've signed up to 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn separately in the past. This time I decided to sign up for full network access. Since PU does not list the umbrella site, Diesel Access, I randomly chose this site for the review.
I've enjoyed these sites but I have to say I was a bit disappointed with my latest subscription. Admittedly, my expectations were high with the price I paid but there were other issues as well. Let's start with the network. Typically, I expect some variation when you join a network. These sites were almost identical in theme and even shared some content. Basically 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are the same site. Then there are a handful of solo model sites. These solo models also appear in the above mentioned sites!
Aside from my issues with the network they could also work on producing more original content with a larger number of girls. I only kept 9 video clips which is small considering the price I paid.
On the positive side there are some truly superb ladies on this site. I typically don't collect pics but I downloaded a bunch of them from this site. The site is easy to navigate and I had no issue with downloads or streaming.
To sum up, I would recommend this site to anyone into the Euro-teen genre. I'd suggest joining either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn but not the network as it's just more of the same. |
|
10-14-10 04:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Good Web site navigation
+ Filtering/sorting tools to help you find photosets & vids
+ High quality streaming videos that start almost instantly and look decent on full screen
+ Daily updates (alternates between photosets and videos)
+ Good blend of BG, GG, masturbation and solo/striptease content. Solo is the largest category if you break it down.
+ Decent quality video: 852x480 / 2.4 Mbps
+ User comments on vids/photos |
Cons: |
- Could use a little more variety in the model list
- Kind of weird filter tags (i.e. Jerker!, Toying, Close-up)
- Some of the older stuff looks familiar so may not be exclusive.
- Access to network sites either costs more money or requires you stay a member for a couple months. |
Bottom Line: |
The 18 Only Girls Web site is a joy to use. They have taken advantage of many of the cool new technologies you see on cutting edge Web sites. They have "skins" that allow you to change the color scheme, tag clouds to help you search and a neat mouse-over effect on the thumbnails that creates a mini-slide show so you can see more of the video/photos without clicking the link to the download page.
Beyond the bells and whistles this site has a solid foundation. 500+ videos and 600+ photosets make it worth the money even without network access. I really enjoyed the novelty of streaming videos that worked well! There is also robust search tools and navigation.
To top it off there are truly beautiful women on this site. It is rare I skip a video because of the appearance of the model.
There is a decent amount of hardcore but it would be nice if they evened it out with the solos. The freebie network site Policemen.net is a throw away.
18 Only Girls is a hidden gem. I recommend it! |
|
06-16-09 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Adult Rated
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Good amount of content
- Decent navigation |
Cons: |
- Video quality lacking in some movies
- Full version of clip not always available
- Content seemed a bit old |
Bottom Line: |
Not worth the $25 dollar charged for access. A bit of a disappointment. |
|
01-19-08 06:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Sexy model interviews at the beginning of each clip.
+ Full intercourse worked in between blowjobs.
+ Consistently attractive models.
+ Good download speeds/download manager friendly. |
Cons: |
- A little pricey, especially considering the amount of content.
- Only one update a week.
- The Web site isn't intuitive.
- Scenes are repetitive. (It is a blowjob site so somewhat expected.)
- Girls in a state of full or partial dress during sex scenes. |
Bottom Line: |
Amateur Allure delivers on the blowjob niche. If you want to see hot girls happily sucking cock, that's what you get!
The new video updates are published in 1080p. Slightly older videos are in 720p. If you really dig into the archive the clips are lower resolution/bit rate. The production quality is consistent throughout.
The monthly rate is a negative for this site. Considering the amount of content, number of updates (currently once a week) and lack of any network access make $36 a month a little pricey compared to the competition. |
|
09-16-12 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
8
|
Amateur Creampies
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Cute, natural looking models
+ Decent amount of content
+ Vids available in wmv and real player formats
+ Bonus sites |
Cons: |
- Even newer video are behind the times in resolution. Older stuff is worse.
- Blog format of site is a bit annoying. I don't want to hear about the parties this guy went to over the weekend.
- Guy in sex scenes talks too much
- I couldn't find the girl who had a clip on the free tour (Brit)
- Only a couple of the five or so bonus sites appear to be regularly updated. |
Bottom Line: |
This site didn't work for me. On paper it looks good but when all the elements come together it fizzles.
The cute, amateur looking girls drew me in but I ended up only keeping about six videos. I think it was a combination of the way the guy talked too much, bad video quality and the guy's attitude in the blog that you see when you enter the member area just bothered me.
You'll find some good creampie scenes here. If you can deal with the guy and the sub par video quality then it might be worth a month's subscription. |
|
07-13-08 03:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
American Vice
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Plenty of content: 2015 DVDs/12,000+ scenes
+ Good monthly rate at $17.95
+ Content categorized and good filtering options
+ Three video quality levels for downloadable clips
+ A lot of variety
+ Frequent updates |
Cons: |
- OK video quality (680 x 480/2000k)
- Mediocre talent |
Bottom Line: |
Looking at my pros and cons you may think my score is skewed. I didn't have a lot of problems with this site that I could call out but I just found the overall experience a bit bland.
Typically with sites of this size I enjoy spending hours plugging in different search criteria and finding those video treasures. With American Vice I just didn't have that experience. I felt I got through the site fairly quickly and only kept a handful of downloads by the time the month was over.
I also had a beef with the video quality. They use 680 x 480 resolution which is becoming a little dated. Some of the clips were actually wide screen embedded within the 680 x 480 full screen. This made quality even worse if I cropped the video to fit my widescreen monitor.
I don't regret joining. It was worth it for the price but I'm not supper anxious to re-join. |
|
06-21-09 08:48am
Replies (10)
|
Rating
10
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
78.0
|
No Review.
|
01-20-08 08:11am
|
Review
11
|
ATK Petites
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ True HD quality video (New vids are 1280 x 720/3.8 Mbps. Older vids are good at 854 x 480)
+ Good quality streaming video
+ Exclusive content updated regularly.
+ Non exclusive content from network sites available. It's separated out from the exclusive content, which is nice.
+ Plenty of content (over 1500 vids according to the TBP stats)
+ Girl named Kasey -- hot!
+ There is actually a height/weight definition of what they consider "petite" -- 5'4", 110 lbs. |
Cons: |
- No network access included with subscription. (Though there is some bonus content.)
- The site performance was fine when browsing but sometimes the downloads slowed to a crawl.
- I also had sporadic issues with the streaming video.
- Some of the videos got into foot fetish for some reason. (May be a plus for some.) Seemed like a random pairing with a petite site. |
Bottom Line: |
I enjoyed my month with ATK Petites. They have a nice blend of really cute, American and Euro girls. I'm personally not heavy into the petite fetish but if I were I might be a bit disappointed. Though they use height/weight requirements the petite aspect of the models physique isn't always accentuated.
The newer videos are high quality HD and older material is still good. I did have some issues with slow download times. When playing these videos in the VLC player I had some issues with freezing and pixelating, especially when I used the slider. (I considered putting this in the "cons" section but this may be an issue with the VLC player.)
Overall ATK Petites is a solid site. |
|
07-03-10 01:26pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
12
|
Brain Pass
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Endless ways to navigate content. (i.e. Category, pornstar, studio, latest updates, etc.)
+ Insane amount of content
+ Some infrequently seen niches such as "Petite" and "Public Nudity". Some of the network sites also cater to less popular niches such as "Tiny Ass".
+ Videos offered in different sizes and either full scenes or segmented. Wmv & mpg formats
+ Ability to cross between sites without being reprompted for sign in.
+ Daily updates of 6-8 videos.
+ "Upcoming updates" feature
+ Good quality video (720 x 480 2000kb)
+ Low monthly price |
Cons: |
- No HD quality/widescreen movies
- Web site design a bit crude (though functional) |
Bottom Line: |
One thing that's baffled me about Brain Pass is once you enter the member area, you never see the brand, "Brain Pass" again! The umbrella site is called Pornstar Network and there are no sites in the network called Brain Pass.
Mystery name aside it is a great site, especially for the price! Brain Pass is one of those sites you can get lost in. You start browsing and you find a site or category that appeals to you and the movies in that one little slice of the site seem to go on forever.
With the the large amount of content and the great site navigation there truly is something for everyone -- and you can find it! They have solo girls, themed sites, fetishes, hardcore, softcore, Euro, American, you name it.
One feature I find useful is the "Featured site" on the Home page. It offers up one of network sites with a short description and the number of videos and photo sets. It changes with every page refresh.
To sum it up, Brain Pass is a great site! |
|
03-15-09 08:45pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
13
|
Club Sapphic
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ A storyline is incorporated into the scenes that is easy to buy into and sexy.
+ Decent video quality: 720 x 408/4mbps
+ TBP discount
+ Some great regular models that appear in scenes with varying themes. |
Cons: |
- Somewhat misleading depiction of the content from the non-member Home page and tour pages
- Older video content of poorer quality.
- Some of the models looking a little ragged. |
Bottom Line: |
This is my second time back to Club Sapphic. My previous subscription was about ten months ago. At the time I gave them a fairly positive review. Unfortunately my return to the site hasn’t been as positive.
The biggest issue I have is a change in the content provided. The site is sold as a general lesbian site with young, attractive models. When I joined previously there was some variation in the model body types -- some were more amateur looking with a few imperfections, some were more modelesque, some were older, some were younger, etc. but generally there seemed to be no theme around bodytype or age.
When I returned to the site recently there appeared to be A LOT of MILF type models in younger/older scenarios. Also, there was generally more women with tattoos and bad boobs jobs (of any age).
With the decision to take the site in the MILF/younger-older direction, They should really consider re-branding the site. I still found some good clips but overall it was a disappointment because it isn't my favorite niche.
I was also a little annoyed because the splash page when you first visit the site displays all younger, pretty models with no mention or reference to the large amount of MILF content coming out in recent updates. (About three pages into the tour you start seeing some screen shots of more recent videos.)
Doing a younger/older site is fine, just sell it that way! |
|
01-26-11 07:20pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
14
|
Club Sapphic
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Great lesbian sex. I can't say it's "authentic" as I'm neither a woman nor lesbian but it's good!
+ Videos have a simple storyline and some build up to the main event. (In most cases not too much.)
+ TBP discount.
+ Can browse content in thumbnail or detail view.
+ A few really great regulars in the videos including Elexis Monroe and Samantha Ryan.
+ Models of different ages and varying body types gives some good variety.
+ Videos offered in segments or full download in a few different file types. |
Cons: |
- Awkward and somewhat misleading site design.
- Confusing/non-functional rating system.
- Little used site functionality. (i.e. tags, blog)
- Mediocre video quality compared to the file size. |
Bottom Line: |
With a little fine tuning Club Sapphic could be a really great site. The storyline and passion the models put into the sex scene is something overlooked on many porn sites these days. If you compare the acting to another popular lesbian site like Sapphic Erotica it's like day and night.
The producers of the videos are creative in how they build the sexual tension between the models. There is cheating, straight girls going lesbian for the first time and cat fights as a few examples that I enjoyed.
There are currently around 120 videos that you can browse on a fairly simple page with a detail/thumbnail option. One peeve I have is the release date of the update is not displayed on the thumbnail view. Otherwise it's easy to navigate with some different filtering options.
The site itself has a network feel to it though there really is no network. (Which is a disappointment after you learn the reality.) I'm guessing the webmaster has visions of a network someday but it ain't here yet! I'd suggest removing the network references until there are at least two sites.
Another confusing piece of functionality is the rating system. There is a 5 star user rating for each video, each girl and each site (LOL). There is also an "LN" rating, which I suppose is the webmaster's rating -- i.e. LN = Lesbo Network. When I tried to add my own ratings the mouse over effect over the stars made them fill in or empty as I went back and forth over them but when I clicked on a star it didn't save my rating.
There is also a "Like" rating for each video. I don't know if this is different from the 5 star rating but I basically gave up on rating stuff after a while.
When I started downloading from the site there was always an HD file type label but none of the movies actually had an HD video. (Another tease!) To their credit it appears that label has been removed as of today. |
|
04-19-10 03:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Crystal Clear Movies
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ 1800+ hardcore video clips (no photos)
+ Simple and easy to use navigation. Ability to filter content by category.
+ Good download speeds -- site works with download manager.
+ Decent video quality. The movies are offered in three quality grades: a high quality 640x464 wmv, a 320x240 MPEG and a 320x240 wmv.
+ Looks like they are doing one video update daily. |
Cons: |
- Limited information on models. (i.e. No way to search/filter on a particular porn star. Some movies don't even reference the model's name.)
- Some (maybe all) content not exclusive.
- Some models not of the highest caliber. |
Bottom Line: |
Crystal Clear Movies is a site for the hardcore porn fan. Most of what you'll find here is the good ol' standby of hot girl with fake boobs gets fucked by guy with tattoos and a big cock. If you prefer a variation of this theme the content can be filtered by category.
CCM has some movies with the big names in porn today -- Monica Sweetheart, Dani Woodward, Hillary Scott, etc. and some relative unknowns. Unfortunately CCM doesn't really help you with getting to know those unknowns in many cases because the labeling is inconsistant. Some movies they'll label "Lexi Luv" while other will be something like "Movie #103" or "Gina in a hot tub".
With so much quantity I guess CCM had to sacrifice a bit on quality. Most of the girls are at least OK looking or better. A subset of the girls however were not looking their best on the day of filming -- too much makeup, braces (or need of them) or just not attractive. |
|
05-03-08 07:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
16
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
93.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Stunning models. Euro girls watch out! CA is catching up on you.
+ Great navigation features. Can use calendar to browse by date posted or browse by girl.
+ Good live sex cam page.
+ Weekly content updates
+ Great quality, near HD vids
+ Good quality Flash videos if you choose to watch online. |
Cons: |
- Scenes somewhat repetitive.
- It would be nice to see some ethnic variety in the girls. (All white) |
Bottom Line: |
Wow! Lately I've been feeling like I've seen it all and there is nothing new or exciting out there in the online porn world and then this site comes along and knocks my socks off!
I usually judge a site on how many videos I download and keep. This site comes as close to 100% keep as I've come with any site in recent memory. Really hot, oiled up women being massaged and then fucked. How can you beat that? I did delete a few clips just because the girls were only beautiful versus stunningly beautiful or the scene was hot but not super hot.
My only minor complaint is the video scenes are a bit repetitive. The guy gives the same interview and even seems to repeat the same sexual positions with each girl.
Over all a great site -- loved it! |
|
03-14-10 07:35pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
17
|
Girls Kissing
(0)
73.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ A decent amount of content. (350+ videos)
+ Good price at $16.95 a month.
+ Some good kissing scenes with beautiful women. |
Cons: |
- Videos only available in AVI format.
- Low quality video. A random sampling of the files I downloaded shows 704 x 512/0.7 Mbps is close to the norm.
- Looks to be all non-exclusive.
- Odd Web site navigation.
- Some videos extremely short.
- No storyline or build-up in most scenes
- No model index and models not indicated on individual scenes. |
Bottom Line: |
The producers of Girls Kissing are a literal bunch. What they give you is female porn models kissing, and that's it! It appears all the video is non-exclusive lesbian scenes that has been edited to show just the kissing portion of the scene. That means the video could be 1 to 3 minutes but some are closer to 30 seconds.
Girls Kissing is a disappointment in several other ways. The video quality is circa 2002. Though I yearn to see the cute blond and brunette sucking face up close and personal the AVIs I download are barely acceptable in full screen mode. The streaming is good for a preview but the quality is even worse than the download.
The Web site itself is functional but nothing fancy. You can click on the "Videos" menu and page through them in chronological order. There is also a "Big Videos" menu that seems to be all Japanese girls kissing. Either "big" is some acronym I'm not familiar with or maybe these videos are a larger file size -- who knows.
Updates come about twice a month. (Though they do give you 4-5 videos with the update.)
After the disappointing experience I had with Kiss Me Girl and now Girls Kissing I think I will need to enjoy my appreciation for the female mouth within the context of typical lesbian and hardcore sites. |
|
08-02-10 05:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Newer vids are near-HD quality.
+ Most models range from cute to gorgeous. A few straggler don't make the cut.
+ Good direction of models in scenes. (Granted, a subjective opinion)
+ In many of the vids the woman is also given oral.
+ Minimal dirty-talk from women giving handjob like on some similar sites. (Again, depends on individual taste)
+ "warm up" interviews.
+ Frequent use of baby oil. Both for handjob and to oil up the woman beforehand. |
Cons: |
- Basic, no-frills site navigation.
- With older content there is a lot of inconstancy. Sometimes the full movie is not offered or one of the formats is not offered.
- I would like to see the jump to full HD.
- Infrequent updates to network sites. As far as I could tell Her Sweet Hand, Sybian World and maybe Perfect D are still updating. HSH has the most frequent updates. |
Bottom Line: |
I almost don't want to like Her Sweet Hand because of it's shabby appearance and inconsistencies but I have to admit G. Picasso turns out some good content. That's what really matters, right?
Some of the models on this site are stunning. G Picasso takes full advantage of the fact and starts off each movie with a short interview, the model undressing (though they usually start off mostly unclothed) and having her rub oil all over herself.
The site is mostly handjobs but blowjobs and full hardcore sex is frequently worked into the scenes.
Overall it's a great site if you are a fan of the niche. |
|
04-06-10 01:17pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
19
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Some beauties on this site. Most are youthful with tight bods.
+ 7 bonus sites with no duplicated content (That I've seen)
+ Plenty of content in the almost-hardcore genre -- handjobs, blowjobs and masturbation scenes.
+ Some newer content is near-HD quality |
Cons: |
- Video content quality is highly variable. There is wide screen and full screen, crisp and blurry, high and low res, some videos look narrow like the picture is compressed.
- Video format is also highly variable. The movies are sometimes available in Quicktime, sometimes in wmv and sometimes in both. All the movies are broken into sections. The full file is sometimes available in one or both formats.
- Receive random server errors
- Slow download speeds and there are download limits |
Bottom Line: |
I'm a big fan of the handjob. There are not many quality sites in this niche so I was excited to join this site to see what they had to offer.
I did find some really great movies to add to my collection. The girls are beautiful and the sex is natural and arousing.
That said the cameraman/male participant could be a buzz kill at times. The real limp-dick moments were when he asked the girls, "are you OK?" or made unnecessary apologies.
This site has a lot of potential to be one of the best handjob sites out there. Clean up the technical glitches, standardize the format and some edits to the content would do wonders.
The site does have a notice on the Home page that they are in the process of revamping the site. I'd hold out for the change if you're considering a membership.
Follow-Up:
I recently subscribed for another month. I decided to up my score from 78 to 82. They keep putting out quality content with beautiful girls. They are also getting better with consistency in video quality. |
|
03-01-08 03:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Innocent High
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Great looking girls
- Good price for the amount of content ($17.87 a mo.)
- Decent quality video though I haven't seen any 720 x 480 as indicated on the TBP review and picture quality a bit fuzzy.
- Favorites section to save clips
- If you enjoy the school girl fantasy this sites for you. |
Cons: |
- Needs more content
- Bonus sites are mostly throw away. The amount of content is small and the girls aren't so hot.
- I do too much scrolling. The addition of more paging in the redesign would be a great help.
- Multiple sign in prompts
- Download limits. (Be prepared to flip between IE and Firefox to get the multiple downloads going.) |
Bottom Line: |
I do enjoy the school girl fantasy and my first week as a member I haven't been disappointed. If the creators of the site added some more content (Maybe branch out to other scenarios - student-on-student, college scenarios, first job, etc.) and boosted up to at least DVD quality video it would be a really great site.
1/23/2008: After being a member of this site for a bit longer I've decided to bump up my rating to the "Very Good" range (78 --> 82). Everything I mentioned above still stands but I have to say some of the girls in these movies are just damn sexy. I've downloaded and kept more movies than I ever would from a "78" level site. |
|
01-19-08 02:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
21
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Huge amount of content
+ Some realistic sex/masturbation scenes in some of the movies.
+ Site broken up into categories to make for easy browsing
+ Frequent updates (5 per week) |
Cons: |
- Some lower quality vids when you start getting to the older content
- Some movies only available as segments -- no full version available
- Seems to be a lot of so-so girls you need to browse through to pick out the gems
- Too much soft core (for me)
- Site design a little clunky |
Bottom Line: |
Karup's Hometown Amateurs is a lot like the Batman movies to me. They never live up to all the hype!
Don't get me wrong, Hometown Amateurs is a good site. There is an insane amount of content so there is something for everybody. The video quality is decent and there are some attractive women and good sex scenes on the site.
On the flip side KHA could use a little work on the navigation so the users can find the movies/girls that are to their liking easier. The video options are also leave more to be desired.
This is a personal preference but I do prefer more hardcore sex on a site. If you're a softcore/amateur guy that won't be a problem! |
|
03-14-09 08:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
22
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Site fully dedicated to beautiful women kissing.
+ Simple site design easy to navigate (for amount of content).
+ Model names included as part of video file name. |
Cons: |
- Lack of variety in scenes.
- Only most recent 20 or so videos are offered as full length download. The remaining videos can only be downloaded in segments.
- No storyline or build up to the kissing scenes.
- Quality of video a bit behind the times. (Most recent videos: 500 x 278/2 Mbps)
- Small amount of content considering the age of the site.
- Infrequent updates -- maybe one video once a week? (There are no date stamps on the site.)
- Expensive considering what you get.
- Insanely long, 45 second credits before video starts. |
Bottom Line: |
A few weeks ago I had the urge to find a really good kissing site. I found this site and I also signed up for another site called Girls Kissing. Unfortunately, I have yet to find a really good kissing site!
Technically speaking, Kiss Me Girl is a bland site at best. It's basically a black and teal column of video updates with sparse navigation.
Fortunately, there isn't much navigation needed. There are only about 80 videos. Of the 80, only about 20 are available in full length wmv files. Even the newest videos are only mediocre in resolution and bit rate (see above). This is a shame because this particular niche really needs those crystal clear close ups.
In a nutshell this site would be a nice addition to a network but as a stand alone site it's a waste of money. A good kissing site really needs the HD quality video. This site does have some hot models but if the picture is grainy or fuzzy it really does take away from the scene. |
|
08-01-10 03:51pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
23
|
Little Mutt
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Mostly cute amateur models with a young, thin and natural look.
+ Some of the girls are the quite Eastern European types but there are plenty English speaking girls that act out scenes and participate in dirty sex talk.
+ Good amount of variety in the content. They have lesbian, boy-girl and solo movies.
+ Low price through TBP discount
+ Made the jump to HD & widescreen with newer videos |
Cons: |
- Slow download rates
- Does not support download pause & restart with download manager
- The "future updates" can be a tease. |
Bottom Line: |
This was my second time as a member of Little Mutt. I was happy to find the site hasn't degraded at in in quality or quantity. As a matter of fact both have gone up! The movies and pics are now HD quality. They have also taped a series of massage videos that are surprisingly well done. You really get the sense the girls are getting hot and bothered by the massage and toys being administered to them.
For the price this is a must-see site! |
|
09-06-08 09:36pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
24
|
Little Mutt
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Mostly cute amateur models with a young, thin and natural look.
- Some of the girls are the quite Eastern European types but there are plenty English speaking girls that act out scenes and participate in dirty sex talk.
- Good amount of variety in the content. They have lesbian, boy-girl and solo movies.
- Low price through TBP discount
- Little Mutt hasn't made the leap to HD yet but even the older videos are decent quality. The newer movies are widescreen format with a crisp picture. |
Cons: |
- Could use more boy-girl hardcore content
- Only one or two new videos a week. |
Bottom Line: |
Some amateur teen site movies are lacking in certain areas. The models are beautiful but the sex/acting is stiff in that "going through the motions" sort of way. Little Mutt has added the sexy back. The models are put into arousing scenarios and are convincing while acting out their passion. They also have plenty of variety in the story lines.
Oh, and the girls are really hot! |
|
01-22-08 04:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
25
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
+ Good search features
+ Network access comes with price
+ Great looking European women
+ Fun scenarios in movies
+ Video quality is decent
+ Nice site design |
Cons: |
- Newer movies seem more tame
- Camera man talks a little too much at times
- Many of the other network sites not to my tastes |
Bottom Line: |
Mike's Apartment is my favorite of the Reality Kings network of porn sites. I became a fan of this site about a year and a half ago after downloading a few movies through some peer sharing software.
Mike really knows how to direct the girls and the interplay is great. One of those first few movies I downloaded was with Sophie Moone when she must have been fairly new to the scene. What an amazing ass!
I finally took the plunge and joined Reality Kings. The video quality is better than two years back but otherwise it is a bit disappointing. Mike doesn't direct all the movies himself anymore and his substitute isn't as good. I'd rather have the guy just not say anything at all.
The sex doesn't seem as good in the newer movies either. There seems to be more solo/masturbation movies (...with the hotter girls of course) and the hardcore scenes are a little more mechanical.
Overall Mike's is a great site for someone into amateur/Euro porn. I recommend joining for one month just to download some of the classics. |
|
02-08-08 03:22pm
Replies (0)
|