Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Nakedby
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Excellent photography featuring natural French girls
+ About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content)
+ High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics
+ Good 7 day full access trial of $10
+ Some model information provided and nice clean site design
+ Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week)
+ No DRM |
| Cons: |
- Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options
- Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set)
- Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone)
- Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book
- Zip feature only available in medium size |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here.
Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here.
There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites.
For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either.
Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side. |
|
08-14-08 03:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership |
| Cons: |
- No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries |
| Bottom Line: |
I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!
First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).
This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.
On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.
However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes". |
|
07-31-08 04:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
53
|
Twistys
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day |
| Cons: |
- Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.
There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.
I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.
The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.
Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon |
|
07-25-08 05:07pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
54
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive Euro girl
- Updates fairly regularly
- Good sized pics with zip option and videos (1280x720 on pics and vids are 720x400)
- Exlcusive content
- No DRM
- Access to Twisty's websites
- Website is good looking |
| Cons: |
- Pics and videos could be of higher quality
- Video download speed is only average
- All softcore, no lesbiansism or hardcore |
| Bottom Line: |
Annette is an attractive girl with a good looking site. As of July '08 she has 53 photo sets and 38 videos.
As I stated, the sight is good looking and there is a good search function. She has a nice personality and definitely a hot bod even with the breast implants. She has a few sets where she is mostly clothed. I should note that the pics only download in one size.
The big bonus is access to Twisty's and its array of content. As a stand alone site, it would be hard to justify $20 in my book but then again I'm not one who usually joins solo model sites (I joined on a TBP trial offer throuh another Twisty's site). Personally, I would like to see her get a little edgier in her sets as they seem to blur together after a while at least for me.
The site could be better if it went high def but I know that's probably not going to happen with a solo model site. If you find her attractive it's definitely worth it if you join through Twisty's but for me I probably would not join it on it's own. |
|
07-16-08 02:46pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
55
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of exclusive content (220+ models and most have multiple sets)
- Good sized pics with zip (1280 x 850)
- No DRM
- Excellent trial rate of $2.26 for 2 days through TBP
- Excellent search functions |
| Cons: |
- No picture download options, you only get one size
- Vids are only average and come in wmp and quicktime downloads at 640x480 with average download speeds
- Only 50 videos and most are short (under 8 minutes) and some have annoying music in them
- Pics only come in one size |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site as part of the TBP trial offer. I was generally impressed by the content at it appears to be almost all exclusive. It has a lot of porn stars and generally attractive women. You also get to link into Twisty's, Annette Dawn and the Twisty's clone sites as part of your bonus features.
The search function is very good. You can look up models, physical features, clothing, etc. for the sets. The site is pretty softcore, not much toys or lesbianism. The focus is mostly glamour shots.
I like the fact that Twisty's has added an exlusive glamour site. However, for my money the content is only above average. If you like pornstars or amateurs there are better sites with better content out there. The content isn't bad but it's a little too glamour for me. The lack of vids and general non high definition content also puts it back in the pack as well.
It's definitely worth the trial since you also get access to the Twisty's sites as well. I will note that I joined through epoch and I got an offer to stay a member for $9.99 per month. |
|
07-16-08 02:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
NS All Access
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each)
- Exclusive content
- Good TBP discount price of $15 month
- Access to 14 sites and some bonus material
- No DRM
- Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps |
| Cons: |
- Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set
- Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps
- Navigation needs work
- Site gets repetitive
- Some sites have stopped updating |
| Bottom Line: |
I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack.
The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies.
For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network.
I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough.
The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models.
If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality. |
|
06-05-08 05:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
58
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary |
| Bottom Line: |
I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.
First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.
The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.
The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.
The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.
My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.
This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money |
|
05-01-08 11:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
59
|
Karup's PC
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
04-25-08 02:49pm
|
Review
60
|
POV Network
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to 5 sites
- In expensive trial ($5)
- Some high quality vids and OK photos
- No DRM
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Sites are poorly designed
- Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that
- Most sets are lower quality vids and pics
- No zip and only one photo size
- Many dead links
- Not a lot of content
- Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster
- Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff" |
| Bottom Line: |
This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site.
I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much.
I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued.
Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here. |
|
04-21-08 06:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
61
|
Suze Video
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Expanded libary now (100s of videos each in several different categories)
- Lots of attractive models
- No DRM
- Good customer support
- Good unrestricted trial offer (when available)
- Professional camera work |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds a little slow
- Video quality is average at best
- Navigation could be better |
| Bottom Line: |
I recently did a review of suze.net (photos site only) and recently reupped for the combined suze.net and suzevideo.net. I'm limiting my review here to the videos.
I'm primarily into photos and didn't spend a lot of time with the videos. You have several download options in WMV format. I did note that the speeds were a little slow and you don't get hi res, just average video quality at best. For the most part, the women are attractive and the scenes are hot so that is the trade off.
Navigation is a but of a bummer for both sites. When you have years worth of material but can only jump 2 pages at time you think they would make paging easier.
In a nutshell, the videos arent' bad, the most recent videos are best. However, Suze and company started in the photography era and the photos are probably the best part of the site. Maybe this will change. I would probably stick to the trial offer when they advertise for one -- in my other review I noted that you have to hunt for their trials but they are out there. |
|
04-17-08 04:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
All Inclusive Pass
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Reasonable Trial Price
- 10 Site Access
- Generally Good Photo Quality
- No DRM
- OK video with various download features
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Limited Updates
- No zip on photos
- Slowish download speeds on videos
- Navigation could use improving |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of this site should be changed from "Allinclusivepass" to "Allwegotpass". I had been a member several years ago and after a computer crash I decided to come back to replace what I lost. Basically, the content was unchanged. Only about half the sites seemed to have any real updates in the last year and only 2 or 3 of the sites seemed to have any real regular updates. Most of the sites have around 20 sets to choose from, some more and some less.
There are some interesting niches with the "Sleepassault", "Motherdaughterfuck" and "Usemydaughter" sites but, again, the lack of quantity and updates hurts.
The photos come in at full screen or larger and are OK in quality. The vids are generally just OK.
I don't have much to say that Roseman didn't include in his review. So the bottom line is this: The material you get is fine for a trial membership but there isn't enough quantity, quality or updates to stick around for any length of time. Join once and you probably don't need to go back. |
|
04-16-08 01:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
63
|
Hegre Art
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography
- Mostly attractive girls from all over the world
- Good customer service
- No DRM
- Multiple photo download options
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Video quality is average
- Most of the models are not very "livley"
- Wish there were more models to choose from |
| Bottom Line: |
As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice.
As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times.
I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative.
All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again. |
|
04-08-08 09:56pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
64
|
Suze Randall
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Suze is a legend
- Huge Photo Archieve
- Multiple Download Options
- Model Search & Index
- Good Customer Service
- Hot babes if glamor and/or fetish is your thing
- Sweet $4.77 full trial |
| Cons: |
- Some photo sets are limited (not showing full suite of photos)
- Some "pseudo porn" on the old sets
- You have to hunt for the trial offers
- Possibly some set rotation but does not appear to happen often
- No videos (based solely on the trial offer I signed up for) |
| Bottom Line: |
(Note: This is a review for Suze.net only, it does not cover suzevideo.net)
If you love huge quantities of quality photos of hot girls then this is the place for you. If you're not familiar with Suze think of Penthouse and Hustler as the standard I'm talking about.
I was at Suze.net a few months ago and just came back and what a difference. You now get 10 years of photos which means 500+ boy/girl sets, 300+ girl/girl sets, 1600+ centerfolds and hundreds of additional sets. The sets allow zip and download options of 800, 1024 and 1400 pixels. The sets prior to '03 generally lack the 1400 option. The sets generally had 50 - 100 pics each with older ones usually having less than 50.
A lot of this stuff I hadn't seen since the days when a 56k connection was high speed, Jill Kelly ruled and white guys with names like "Dale DaBoner" swung their stuff. Depsite the fact that many of the sets were older they didn't seem too dated given the glamor/fetish emphasis of the site.
My only dislikes were that the older sets had a lot of psuedo (aka nonpenetration porn) and that Suze keeps shifting her trial offers. I'm a cheap bastard and I eventually found a tgp link that got me into the $4.77 full trial as advertised by TBP. Otherwise, it's hit or miss on the posted trial amounts if you go to the site. Also, a few sets I had seen before lacked all the images available.
With a full trial of less than $10 you simply can't go wrong. Basically, this site rocks. |
|
03-31-08 02:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
65
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large number of models
- Easy Navigation
- User interaction (ratings and feedback)
- Directory of almost all models
- Preview options for vids
- Numerous vid download options including podcast
- Small Medium & Large pics with zip available
- Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions
- For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong |
| Cons: |
- Nonexlusive content that has been around for years
- When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory
- Repetive content
- Content rotates
- Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen |
| Bottom Line: |
I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets.
For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site.
I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory.
I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive.
If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial.
I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month. |
|
03-21-08 10:12pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
66
|
Brazzers
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of movies and picture sets
- No DRM
- Multiple Updates Monday - Friday
- Numerous pornstars
- Multiple themed sites
- Search options and "Girl" catalog available
- User rating system for the sets
- Zip downloads available |
| Cons: |
- HQ photo sets not very high quality\
- Way too many pictures in sets (1000+ usually)
- Quality varies with older material pretty weak
- Navigation is not very good
- Too many models with bad implants |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a bit old school and I happen to like picture sets over movies so I'm going to focus on the pictures here: also, I think enough has been said about the movie downloads.
Almost all sets have way too many pictures (1000 to 2000) with way too many repeat pics. The sets prior to 2007 are not worth looking at. While they advertise high quality photos they are basically slightly less than full screen and some sets have pics no bigger than screen caps. There are some random large format pictures inserted into some sets. The photo quality varies a lot from good to lousy (these guys need to buy a decent digital camera and learn how to focus the thing).
Having said this I give the site an 80 simply because of the volume of content and the fact that you can get a membership for around $20 at this time. If you are into high quality pictures and content then this probably isn't the site for you. Otherwise it is worth checking out but unless you are really into the "big breast, big butt" genre then it's probably not worth sticking around for more than a month or so. |
|
02-26-08 05:52pm
Replies (2)
|
|
