Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Wittyguy (0)

Feedback:   All (830)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (682) Other:   Replies Received (431)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 26 Gaping Angels (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: ++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP ++ 17 site network ++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites + No cross sales on signup + Some 720 sized HD vids + Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading) + Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that + No DRM + A good number of recognizable porn stars + 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches + Several updates per week Cons: -- Crappy search function and no cross site search -- Photosets are worthless and no zip function - HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection - A lot of sites have some overlapping content - Video quality varies from great to crap - Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags - My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me) - Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality - If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks. - Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes. Bottom Line: Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line: PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics. VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting. NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want. Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period. Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score. 04-13-11  02:38pm Replies (1) Review 27 Hot Legs and Feet (0) 87.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: +++ 10 years of content online ++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff ++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video + Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids + Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality + Updates 2 - 3 times a week + Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs) + 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP + Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually) + Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it). + Overall good quality production and lighting + Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either) Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07 -- Navigation and website need a big overhaul -- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them. - Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection) - Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue) - Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes - No search function and no scene tags - Only a few screen caps (get more) - Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available - Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus. - No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email). Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown: PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big. VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good. OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse. The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this). If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing. I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site. 01-26-11  02:26pm Replies (2) Review 28 Babelicious (0) 82.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: ++ $2.75 2 day full access trial through TBP ++ Newest pix go up 4,000 pixels though most stop at 3,000. ++ Daily updates for photo sets (about 1300 photo sets and 600 vids on main site) ++ Years of material on site(s) + Generally decent professional photo and lighting work + All photosets have zip functions and you can zip in 1k, 2k, or 3/4k mode + About 100 or so 1280x720 vids with decent download speeds + Access to 8 other sites + No DRM limits + Uses major billing companies + Small watermarks on pics and vids + Video options include full scene, clips and streaming + Has a detailed search function and a model directory with some bio material + Has a support and FAQ section Cons: -- Nonexclusive content -- Not a site for hardcore fans -- The bonus sites no longer update -- Quality really drops once you go back a few years in both pics and vids. - Cross sales on sign-up page - Navigation could use some work - Only a couple of screen caps showing video contents (needs more) - Have to type in password info for each site (and you get some long randomly generated password when you join) - WMV only file option for downloading vids - Vids only update once or twice a week Bottom Line: I last joined this site about 5 years ago and decided to to the trial option to see what's changed. In short, not much and that's not necessarily a good thing. There really isn't anything to not like about it but it is a mostly softcore nonexclusive content site (if you like your action hardcore, skip this network) that mostly left me feeling "meh". PICS: It's nice to see a site that lets you zip in multiple sizes. As noted above, the newest stuff goes up to 4000 pixels however some pixelation occurs at this level on a few sets. The downside is that the quality drops to about 2k sizes when you get to early 2009 and rapidly drops to 1k sizes thereafter. All pics come up in a separate screen. Most of this is stuff that you've seen before and not necessarily a models best offerings. VIDS: Good download speeds and about 100 newer HD vids. Bad news is that once you get past the HD sizes, the vids fairly quickly drop to 480x320 and the quality of the older stuff is average at best. If you like HC there are only about 40 HC vids in total (1 in HD). Even though I have high speed, the streaming stuff was only OK I had problems jumping forward on some of the streams. OTHER: It does have a good and mostly complete search engine but it's not entirely intuitive (it took me a few minutes to figure out how to find all the HC vids). Jumping around to different pages requires some clicking too. It's not bad (better than some other good sites) but it does need a few tweaks like adding "softcore", "lez" and "HC" categories, etc. All the bonus sites stopped updating at least a year ago so they don't really have anything to offer assuming you've been around the porn block a time or two. The pic size and video quality on those sites is mostly second rate by today's standards. TBP gave this site a "87" score which I can't justify. It's nonexclusive content and once you go back to early 2009 the quality starts to rapidly drop off. It is mostly softcore and, as I noted, these aren't what I would consider the models best work. For me, Twistys, VivThomas, Teendreams and others do a better job with this genre of site than Babelicious does. When I was last a member here I thought the site held up pretty well in comparison to what was going on at the time. Not so much any more. It's not a rip-off by any means but others do it better now. 12-28-10  05:10pm Replies (1) Review 29 Cougars In Heat (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: +++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP +++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds) ++ Lots of good hardcore action ++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots. ++ Exclusive content. + Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though) + No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager + About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids + No watermarks on pics or vids. + Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips + Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me) + Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start. + No cross sales on sign-up Cons: --- Down to 1 update a month. -- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive. -- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen. -- No scene tags or real search function. - Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work. - Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills). - About half the models have boob jobs. - No model directory or model info. - Bonus sites didn't work for me. - Advertising on main page. - Navigation needs some work. - Canceling membership a bit of a pain. Bottom Line: It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get: PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too. VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up. THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying. I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time. Now, how come I never meet these women in real life? 09-16-10  04:30pm Replies (3) Review 30 21Sextury.com (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Sweet TBP/PU rate of $20 to join, eventually dropping to $10 month for ongoing membership + Thousands (maybe even 10k) of scenes + 25 sites network initially, expands to about 41 after a month + Good navigation and the search engine looks amazing and goes across the whole network + No DRM and no DL limits + Newest vids on the flagship sites (PixandVideo, Club Sandy, etc.) go up to 1900x1080 + All pic sets have zips + Professional effects, lighting and photography on the flagship sites + Clearly marked updates + No cross sales or advertising + Lots of hot euro babes + Wide variety of content with multiple daily updates across the network + Archive going back to 2003 on the oldest sites; all exclusive content on the flagship sites Cons: - For the first month, only SweetSophieMoone, AssholeFever, PixandVideo, ClubSandy, LezCuties, FootsieBabes and BlueAngelLive have anything great to offer. (I refer to these below as the Flagship Sites) - Scenes aren't tagged real well so the awesome looking search engine can leave stuff out. - Broken links on some photos and preview thumbs (click the "x", it's probably there) and I got a few bad video downloads. - DL speeds not so hot (mostly 120 to 500 kps, the more channels I have going the faster it seems to go for me). - Pic sizes are obsolete for the level of quality they otherwise offer. - Zips and movie files are not labeled well. Bottom Line: I used to love the individual sites but rarely joined in the past because of price. With the sweet PU/TBP deal, I couldn't resist and will probably stay a member for many months, damn near a first for me. Here's the low down: PICS: All scenes have zip but all pic sizes are limited to 1280x850. WTF? The flagship sites here scream quality but they're still launching 20th century quality with their pic sizes. Most scenes have 100 to 160 pics. Also, when viewing pics individually the horizontal slide bar doesn't automatically appear on landscape shots (again, why?). Once you get past the Flagships, the pics are few and far between but there is plenty to keep you going with the big 6 sites. VIDS: Awesome size on the newest vids. Most of the stuff within the last few years maxes out at 1280. The oldest content and a lot of the content outside the flagship sites peaks at 640 or even 460. You do get 10 screen caps minimum to see what you're getting. You can DL full scenes or scenes. In browser stream is an option and works well. On the most recent content, you usually have 3 download options, only 1 or 2 on the older. Full scene file sizes range from about 40 mb (low quality) to 2 gigs (best quality). DL speed is an issue as I noted above. SEARCH: There is a 25 filter search system which looks awesome. As noted, the problem lies in the lack of adequate tags. Thus, the system sort of defeats itself and you're better off just going through the sites you like one by one. There is a central model directory which appears complete but no model bio's are given. As for "the rest": Some sites have lots of dead links for pics and the like. Just click them, they usually bring something up but it's annoying and a pretty basic problem to overcome. If you liked the old calendar version of the site, the new set up takes a little getting used to. However, after a few days I found it much easier to use, especially on a network this size and found they had lots of options for customizing. It didn't take more than a few clicks to go and get what I wanted. A big issue for me is why are they adding all this content beyond the flagship sites for the first month. It's obviously 3rd party produced and the models and production values just aren't up to 21stSextury snuff. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with Brazzers or NewSensations and add a bunch of sites to pump up the numbers and add "new" sites with overlapping content. My advice is to keep your standards up and focus on the good sites you already had. I'll take quality over quantity ... especially if you boost your pic sizes. Lastly, despite the many negatives I pointed out, I'm still scoring this one a "91" simply because of the volume of content on even just the flagship sites, the hot babes and hot videos. With more sites coming to me soon, it can only get better. Well worth a join even if it leaves this picture fan a bit miffed. 02-24-10  07:17pm Replies (12) Review 31 Asshole Fever (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Currently 305 scenes available, all with pics and vid + Newest max vid sizes are 1900x1080 with most maxing out at 1280 (smaller for the oldest stuff) + No DL limits and Downloadthemall DL manager works + Awesome $20 initial join fee (dropping down to $10 after 2 months) through TBP. + Access to 25 other sites including ClubSandy and PixandVideo right away. + Excellent search engine with 25 filter categories. + Model directory spans the whole network + Exclusive content with no apparent recycling + Loads of hot euro babes taking it where the sun don't shine (all HC content). + Professional photography and video with very good lighting. + Wide variety of content (MF, DP, Indoor/Outdoor, etc.) + Average sized watermarks in cornor Cons: - Only 1 update per week - Pic sizes are too small given the overall quality of this site. - Some problems with downloads not coming through. - Some problems viewing pics in the browser - New site design is fine but navigation could be a bit better - Logging in is a major eye strain (their teeny sized authorization letters you have to copy are almost impossible to read) - Some of the action gets a bit rough and/or mechanical - Some nonworking links (not many though and mostly individual pictures) Bottom Line: If you can't even handle watching your dog/cat lick it's butt, then this site is probably not for you. It's all hot looking euro babes taking like champions where the sun don't shine. Here's the "scoop" (not to be confused with scooping your animals poop): PICS: All pic sets have accompanying video (and seem to match the video in terms of content) and all sets have zip. Excellent quality with only a little air brushing from what I can tell. Bad news, pic sizes are only 1280x850. On average, you get between 100 and 180 pics per set with most pics being 250-300kb in size. Why do sites always seem to do this; getting hung up on video while neglecting their photos standards? These sizes don't cut it any more. Also, when viewing photos individually in the browser, I found that the landscape shots get cut off with a monitor setting of 1080x720. They have an up/down slider bar for portrait pics but no right/left slider bar for landscape. WTF? VIDS: As noted elsewhere, newest max size vid downloads come in at 1900x1080 with most on this site being 1280 by 850. You can stream in browser at L, M and H and download in L, M and H in either .wmv or mp4 settings. File sizes on full length vids vary from about 2 gigs on the newest and largest to about 40 MB on the smallest. Each scene has 10 scene screen caps with scene and full scene download/stream options. Almost no music in vids and I haven't found any scenes yet with direction cues being shouted out. I did have a few problems with some vids just not downloading correctly and having to redo them. They have redone their navigation on 21sextury so now after you log in you get a page that looks like a blog almost. It's easy to jump around but it takes a few clicks to get to what you want if just trying to find, say, all of the scenes in a single site. Once you get used to that, their filter system on the search engine is one of the best I've seen but the scenes aren't tagged very well so relying solely on the search functions will leave out some of the goodies that should be included. Unfortunately, the action sometime gets a bit over the top with chicks just being pounded up the poop shoot because the shot calls for it. While these hot euro babes take it well, there's still a difference between just taking it and actual acting (same with the guys too). The overriding theme here is the anal action doesn't seem very spontaneous or a taboo thrill. The action can still be hot but it's just not all I hoped it would be. I'm scoring this site an 87 on it's own. I'll be working a review on the whole 21sextury.com site soon, probably scoring the network in the low 90's. If you like butt sex, this is one of the best sites I've seen out there. Considering the network you get and the great price (after the second month you only pay $10 a month for a recurring membership) you simply can't go wrong in my butt ... er, I mean book. 02-17-10  03:46pm Replies (7) Review 32 Twistys (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Tons of babes and content + 3 photo set and 2 vid updates daily + Pic sizes up to 3000 pixels + Vids from 2009 onward go up to 1280x720 + High quality search and model directory + No download limits or DRM + Good 2 day full access trial for $2.44 through the bonus sites + 6 other sites offered of which only 3 have original content + Professional, high quality content + One of the better forums I've seen for members + Smallish or nonexistent watermarks + Good customer service Cons: - Download speeds were a bit slow for me but it may just be a prolem on my end. - Vids before 2009 mostly max out at 480x360 - Most of the pic sets clock in at 1020 x 720 or smaller - Some advertising on the site but not terrible - The 3k pixel photos only available in zip format - A lot of nonexclusive content Bottom Line: I was last here in '08 when I dished out an 81. Glad to see things have improved although, as we know, there's always room for improvement. Pictures: About 9500 solo sets, 1350 HC sets and 880 lez sets. As noted, in '09 Twisty's started putting out 3000 pixel pictures but only in the zip sets. Why Shap? Especially since other sites go this big as an option and sometimes we just want to pluck the good stuff as opposed to downloading an 80mb file only to toss most of it later. Most sets have about 100 pics. Pics are professional and generally very good in terms of quality and lighting with some airbrushing, mostly on the solo sets. All sets have a zip function. Watermark is small, posting dates are included, and slideshow option is available (all definitely welcomed). About the only real negative is that most of the pics are 1020 or smaller but this is somewhat expected given the extensive history of content available. Videos: About 1900 solo scenes, 950 HC scenes and 250 lez scenes available. As noted, the new stuff clocks in at 1280 sized and is very impressive in terms of quality. However, most of the stuff is 480x360. Once you go back more than about 18 months, you don't even get vid caps to see what the scenes contain (pain in the but). The oldest vids only come in clips, not full length scene. DL's available in WMV, MOV or pointless "phone" sized. The model directory is excellent although, like most sites, sometimes models mysteriously pick up new names. The search has numerous variations available to sift through the content. Mostly, the tags seem pretty thorough but they are a bit weak on the oldest content in my opinion. While they do have some exclusive content, most of the stuff is nonexclusive and can be found at other megasite / pornstar sites. Not necessarily bad, especially considering the trial price, but quality is sometimes downgraded in my comparisons to other sites when it comes to pic size, pic count per set, and video DL options. The forum seems to be inhabited by people who are usually successful in getting their point across and they have lots of useful topics there. One of the better forums I've seen in pornland (excluding PU naturally). I'm giving my score of 85 based solely on the Twistys content. Bump it up to about an 87 or 88 when you factor in the other sites (Annette Dawn, Bluefantasies and Naughtystaff are the only ones worth visiting). Basically, you're not getting the cream of the crop of here in terms of quality or exclusivity. However, you are getting a ton of pretty good to very good content that keeps updating regularly and can keep you occupied for a while. This site should be rocking in a few more years when they get a lot more HD vids and if they bump the pic sizes to 3000 pixels outside of the zip only function. 01-26-10  07:49pm Replies (0) Review 33 Teen Pink Videos (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Excellent $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP + Lots of hot euro cuties (about 200 models and 1500 scenes split about evenly between pics and vids) + Daily updates + No DRM or DL limits + Pics OK at 1180x790 with some sets being larger sized and all have zips + Interesting function where you can change the size of the thumbnail in the photo galleries. A nice option instead of the usual tiny stuff. + Vids are of good quality Cons: - Cross sales on signup page - Navigation is a bit of a pain - No model info and no search engine - Mostly nonexclusive material - Vids can be tracked via date of posting, pics cannot (a pain if you decide to go back in the future) - The coding of the webpages is such that when you go to a page it has to load all at once, not gradually. If you have slower internet speeds it can take a while to load some pages leaving nothing but a blank screen for a while. - Plain website design - Problems with consistent pic sizes Bottom Line: This is a site run by the people who own Twistys but it's not part of the network. Not much of the content here is on the Twistys network so that was a good start. Overall, I was pleasantly surprised for what you get for a buck. Pics: About 750 photo sets, all with zip. The pics are of good quality with good lighting and cropping and focus even on the closeups. Fairly professional overall. The content is pretty evenly split between hardcore and lez/softcore. Smallish watermark is tolerable. Most girls have multiple sets which is good. Most sets come in with 120 to 200 pics. One problem with a number of sets was that, for example, the portrait shots were 1180 x 790 while all the landscapes were 900x600. Same scene, same shots, what's up with that? Vids: About 750 vid sets, downloadable in mpeg or wmv or as a stream in full video mode or scenes. WMV files top out at 720x480 with decent download speeds. Again, a good even mix of h/c and softcore and lez. The quality is good and the scenes are well shot and mostly professional in quality. You can look at the screencaps from the scenes to see what you're getting. Not all vid scenes have accompanying pic sets but most do. Like I mentioned navigation needs some work. The only way to really find what you want is through the model directory since there's no search engine. The video page is good and easy to get around. The pic sets only allow you to go forward and back one page at a time. For pic sets, you only get one thumbnail showing the set so you sometimes have to dig into it to find out what the set contains. With the vidcaps, you can usually figure what the vid contains. A lot of this stuff is nonexclusive and has been around a while (e.g. - a young Eufrat and Anita Keys are featured here). So, even the "new" upates were most likely shot quite a while ago. However, there was still a lot I hadn't seen before or saw in a "lesser" version elsewhere so I was pretty happy with the selection. Some may be exclusive but the site advertises exclusive content which it certainly lacks. If you're really into the younger euro porn thing and you don't have a hard drive full of the stuff you certainly can't go wrong with the trial price. I could have stayed longer than the trial but the 3 days let me get most of what I wanted. If you've been around the euro teeny block a few times then a lot of the content will be old hat and you'd be better off spending your money elsewhere. 06-18-09  03:21pm Replies (3) Review 34 My XXX Pass (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP + 13 network site + Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark + Mostly exclusive content + Good mix of Euro and American babes + Good action and professional quality shoots + Good download speeds on vids + No DRM or download limits. Cons: - Cross sales on sign-up page - A lot more action in the vids than the pics - Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics - Search is OK but could be better - Each site in network updates 2x per month - A few deadlinks and pics that don't load Bottom Line: I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases. Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files. Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot. There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good. There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning. Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal. 05-13-09  11:05pm Replies (3) Review 35 Brandi Love (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Good price (7 day full access trial for $10) + Decent amount of content (about 100 pic sets, 100 vids and 25 webcam shows) + Hot MILF with great legs and tight bootie who covers the whole range of porn + Weekly live webcam + All vids and cam shows have description of what happens Cons: - Cross sales on signup page - No zips on pic sets - No update schedule and unsure how often it really does update - Video quality average at best - Navigation needs work - Lots of advertising and cross promotions Bottom Line: I usually avoid single model sites but decided to chance it here with Brandi and her banging hot bod. Brandi is an amateur MILF in late 30's early 40's who has a fitness body that most men wish their wife or GF had. She covers the whole gambit on her site, from HC to lez to fetish to swinger to toys to uniform to glam .... She does put a lot of time into her site but overall the site needs some work. Pics: This is where the navigation sucks. She has a pic page with about 10 different categories. However, clicking on a category takes you into the same big archieve that you have to page through. Just one thumbnail to show what it's in the gallery so you have to look at each one to see what's really there. No page jumps, just forward and backward. No zips either. Pic sizes are all over the board from worthless and tiny screen caps to 2300x3500 in your face puntang depending on the set (you don't know until you click). Most of the pics are of good quality but I wish there was more for each set. You get at most 100 in a set and often only about half that. Some sets are continuations of earlier sets but that's not really clear until you get into them. Cropping is not one of her strong points either although part of that problem is that she uses a lot of stills from an HD camcorder for the photo gallery. Videos: There about 100 now. You get four download choices (who the hell still downloads "Real" vids?). No scenes, just full vids. Problem is that most vids are 380x280 and of amateur quality. I wasn't expecting professional stuff as this is an amateur site but the quality still lacked for me. The webcams were OK but they are also fairly small sized. Brandi, boost your vid sizes and get a tripod if the operator can't hold the cam still! You get about 30 HC vids and the rest are solo, lez and in a few other categories. The webcam archieve is pretty good and with about a dozen HC cam shows out of 25 total shows. Each show runs about a half hour. She does do a good job of promoting herself. She has a blog but it's loaded with cross sale stuff and isn't deeply personal, mostly chat about her swinger lifestyle. She is big on the swinging lifestyle and has a lot of links for those who are into that. There is some teaser "friends" stuff from other amateur sites but you don't get anything but a few very shot vids and small pic sets so I just call that advertising. Brandi does enjoy what she's doing and that does come through in the pics and vids. So, I give her an "A" for effort. The execution could be better by enlarging the picture sets, fixing some of the dead links, improving video size and quality and getting some zips done on the pics. It's not a bad site but there's nothing that will keep me here beyond the trial period. 05-06-09  06:43pm Replies (0) Review 36 Swank Pass (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + 8 member network + $6, 3 day full access trial through TBP + Probably over 5000 photo sets (1020x680) with zip. + Thousands of video scenes + No DRM or download limits + Cancellation is easy (you know it's bad when this makes it as a "pro") Cons: - Almost entirely nonexclusive content - Search engine does not work. Finding anything of value is a royal pain. - Quality is poor to average - Majority of pic sets have fewer than 20 pics - Majority of vids available only as clips - Each site updates once a week. Bottom Line: I really was hoping for more when I signed up, thinking that for $6 (I got off cheap) I would find some OK stuff. NOT!!! Let's start by saying if you have ever been to a Deny DeFranco (DDF) site, Vivthomas, Karupspc, etc. you've seen all there is of value seeing here. All the content from the last few years appears to be shot by these major studios. It wouldn't be so bad but that the quality is worse (downgraded for this network) and often times you don't get the full scene at least for the pics. Some of the oldest material, mostly photos, I don't recognize so I can't say it's all nonexclusive. Swank (and all the accompanying network sites) are originally magazine based. Like most magazine sites, they seem unable to make a decent leap to the web; unwilling to shake off what they do in print in hopes of actually having long term economic viability. Swank is apparently betting the farm that some fool will spend money on their mags in the future because they're not investing anything here. You figure with a network the search would be a great way to bring things together. Nope. The search don't work. You can only browse by vids or pics or model directory. Oh yeah, a lot of sets don't have model names attached to them so good luck. It gets worse because several of the sites have over a thousand pic sets. It gets worse again because some of these sites don't tell you on the pic preview pages how many pics are in a set so it's hunt and peck (some sets 4 pics, some 300: What's behind the curtain Monty?). It's just too exhausting to hunt and peck through the mounds of reheated content to find the occasional gem. While pic sets go back over a decade it's only the last few years of material where the sets have more than 20 pics per set. Guess what, some of the network sites won't even tell you what year the set was published ... more hunt and peck for gems ... more swearing. Oh yeah, some of the pics only max at 800 pixels despite the fact you click on the icon for large photos. Most of the content is solo, while there is more hc in the last year or two of updates. The vids max out at 640x480. Some sites having nothing but clips available. Some are about evenly split between full length and clips. Again, all is nonexclusive and average to good quality. About the only good thing is that most of the vids appear to be hardcore. About half the sites cater to big boobs. Otherwise the models are all over the radar from pornstars to amateurs. The solo model pics tend to be more glam oriented harkening to the magazine theme at work here. There is no content from the mags though besides the pics. The only reason I can score this in the 70's is because they have a mountain of content and because they still have acceptable pic and video sizes. Don't waste your money even on the trial. Save your pennies and pay a little extra to see the original stuff in mint condition at the sites that sell Swank their material. 04-08-09  09:06pm Replies (0) Review 37 Leg Action (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP + Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network) + 960 photo shoots and 343 vids + Zip download available + No download limits or DRM + Smallish watermarks Cons: - Search function doesn't work & no model directory - Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680 - Vids max out at 640 x 480 - About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only - Mostly nonexclusive contact - Updates about once a week Bottom Line: For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road. Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different. Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity. The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good. Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez. Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez. The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory. As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches. As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything. Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability. 04-08-09  05:29pm Replies (0) Review 38 Cuties In Stockings (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP + No DRM + Mostly exclusive content + Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings + 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks Cons: - Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined) - Photo quality a bit grainy - No zips on photo sets - No search function and no model info - Only 46 vids of mediocre quality - Some cross marketing for their other sites Bottom Line: No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore. Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part. Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents. The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips. This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes. It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back. I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times. 03-18-09  10:03pm Replies (0) Review 39 Teen Dreams (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Freakin' huge amount of content + Good $20 TBP monthly membership + 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F) + Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum + No DRM + Supports download managers + Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks + Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive + Full tour available before joining Cons: - Search function leaves a real nasty after taste - More of a pic site than a video site - Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between - Quality varies - "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds. - Older material is mostly nonexclusive Bottom Line: I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography. Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller. Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around. My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n". The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it. There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for. Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot. The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff. This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times. If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all. 02-24-09  09:33pm Replies (4) Review 40 Viv Thomas (0) 82.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: + Great $10, 7 day full access trial through TBP + Full access preview before joining (can't view individual sets but can view all model and category content) + Very professional production + 17 categories of photoshoots, all sets have zips + No DRM + Top quality models for the most part Cons: - Updates only every other day - Videos are in short clips only - You've probably already seen the older content - Pics max out at 1280 pixels - Limited model info Bottom Line: Vivthomas is a top notch photographer who's stuff you've probably already seen on sites like Teendreams, ATKgalleria, and others. His focus on Euro glam porn. This is my second time joining and I only hopped on for the trial. For those interested in vids, forget this site and consider Vivthomasvideo. All you get are short clips and access to some streaming vids. I didn't really mess around with this but I note that the clips played at 640x480 in wmv. Most of this stuff is only a few minutes long. The pics are the real reason to go here. He does a very professional job in terms of production value and overall quality. Very few blurry shots or bad lighting. He also uses a variety of sets so it's not overly reptitive. Most sets have fewer than 100 pics which I tend to like since you don't get 10 shots of the same thing. There is a small watermark in the cornor of the pics. The hardcore was good but it doesn't update that often. Viv is probably at his best when shooting solo models. He does a good job of shooting lingerie and seems to bring out some sexiness in the models which a lot of sites seem to lack. There's 17 categories to choose from and you get about 650 models and there's about 165k pics. Some models have bios and bits about them but most don't have anything. The model directory appears to be complete and accurate. There is also a forum which has a fair amount of activity and you can buy his dvds from the site too. I'm only scoring this site an 82 because so much of his older content is leased out that I've seen most of it before. The new stuff is exclusive but it too will eventually start cropping up elsewhere. I certainly had no problem getting what I wanted during the trial period and if you've been around porn for a while you shouldn't have any problem getting by on a trial either. I'm also scoring the site an 82 because of the lack of video content. Granted, he has a video site which costs more but I think I'd rather see him merge the two sites together and charge a bit more to get all the content. My last reason for the score is that his photos sometimes appear in larger sizes on other sites. I just joined Teendreams and their Vivthomas pics are much larger. You get a little graininess but it's minimal. So all I have to say is "Viv, grow 'em bigger!". So, if you like pics, like hot euro babes and want a cheap distraction, then I suggest checking it out. 02-24-09  08:58pm Replies (0) Review 41 Fresh Outta High School (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Cheap $5, 3 day full access trial with TBP + Generally hot looking 18 - 23 old starlets in HC action + Exclusive content + Videos are pretty hot and 30 minutes long on average and no DRM + Access to 24 original content sites (Reelpass) and 22 nonexclusive bonus sites + Good for those with a schoolgirl / uniform fetish + No watermarks Cons: - It's a Newsensations product, 'nuff said - Pics are small and lack a lot of the content found in the vids - No email confirmation of signup or cancellation with the netbilling.com processor - Updates only 1x per week - Some advertising on site - Reptitive in sets and theme Bottom Line: I joined this site on a trial since I noticed it wasn't part of the Newsensations network and I was hoping that maybe they were upgrading their product since it wasn't part of that group ... and I was wrong. Currently, there are 62 sets/scenes and all have pics and vids. Pretty much all feature US youngsters in school girl skirts and conservative tops getting bopped in various ways. The production value is mostly professional with decent lighting and plot settings. Most of the time the girl stays mostly clothed so if you're into uniform type sex you might like this. A lot of the sets are the same and scenes don't vary much so it does get repetitive. There a lot of known pornstars but a few fresh faces as well. No real model directory or model background is offered. Pictures: Each set has about 200 to 300 pics but most are them are just of the girl stripping. Sizes only come in at 1024x680 with a few random 1530x1020's tossed in just to prove that they're intentionlly skimping on pic size. All sets have zip with good labelling. Like I noted, a lot of action on the vids get left out of the pics and you usually end up with a few dozen HC pics. Basically, don't go here for the pics. Videos: Vid size maxes out at 800x600 with full scenes eating up a few hundred megs of disc space. Download speeds were OK. WMV is the only real option here for the biggest size. The action tends to be pretty good overall. There are hundreds of vid caps for each set so you know what you'll be getting on your downloads. As I noted you also get access to the reelpass network with is mostly a newsensations clone. You do get access to newsensations so joining here on the trial might be a cheap way to update from that network if you like their product. This network (reelpass) is not pic friendly so, again, go here for the vids. The bonus sites are just the usual suspects (teensforcash, herfistanal, etc) and pretty much stream only though you can download clips if you're desperate for second rate entertainment. On it's own this site merits a 79. Kick it up a notch or two when rating the whole network. Bigger and more pics would be a welcomed bonus (one of the main reasons I don't go back to Newsensations any more) and bigger vids would also be a nice addition. I did the trial and had no problem getting what I wanted from this site in a day. If you like school girls this site is OK but you might be more entertained with a site like Innocenthigh. If you have the uniform sex fetish going, this ain't bad but I'd stick with the trial. 02-04-09  04:19pm Replies (1) Review 42 Suze Classics (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Good $10, 7 days full access trial + Also get full access to suze.net and suzevideo + Definite retro porn from the 80's and 90's + Pics remastered up to 1200x850 with zips + Good quality vids + Exlusive updates (er, "retrodates" perhaps) 3-4x a week + No DRM Cons: - No video and pic set overlap (aka - no pic sets and vids of the same scene) - No real HC photosets - Site still smallish - Prechecked cross-sale(s) on sign-up page - Advertising on the pages but no too annoying Bottom Line: If unshaved muff and names like Raqueal Darrian, Savannah, Christi Canyon and Teri Weigel bring back fond memories then this site might be worth donning your smoking jacket, trimming your 'stache and sitting back to go stroking with the oldies. This site features porn US stars from the 80's and 90's. Here's the basic breakdown: Pics: There are about 110 sets and all have zip. Three sizes going up 1200x850. All are basically digitally scanned photos from the original pic or negative and there is a smallish transparent watermark. Surprisingly there was very little graininess so the quality was good for what they were. The original lighting and cropping sometimes suffered though. The sets are somewhat small (most having less than 50 pics). I counted one true hc set but there were a few psuedo hc sets (no penetration) from the days when the skin mags couldn't show that stuff. This is defintely glam porn so if amateurs are your thing you probably won't be too into this. Vids: About 75 vids using WMV player only. 3 sizes to choose from (300k, 1 gig and 2 gig) and they're about 15 minutes long. The largest sized out at 720x540 and they streamed for me around 350 kbs. Almost all the scenes are HC and remastered from the original film or tape. Again the quality on the remasters was very good but the original lighting and directing sometimes left something to be desired. Still there was some hot action here. I'm scoring this site on it's own at an 82 simply because it's still growing, the original quality was sometimes suspect and for some reason this site did less for me than I expected it would. As I noted, you also get full access to Suze.net and Suzevideo. When you consider the network as whole, I'd score it around an 89 or 90 because the other two sites save it (See my comment on the suze.net page entitled "Site Stats Update" for what the network currently contains). They have also added a forum but it's still relatively new, not real informative and the only person from Suze who seems to contribute is Holly Randall (she seems to be running the show now). There is a model directory but it doesn't have much background info on the models themselves. There is also a search function for various sex acts and poses. If you're into retro porn, the 7 day trial price makes it worth checking out. For me, it was more of reminder of how much better porn is today than it was years ago but there is still some decent stuff there. 01-22-09  06:20pm Replies (1) Review 43 Reality Pass HD (0) 77.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + 5 site network (4 HC, 1 Lez) + Good TBP $5, 3 day full access trial + Some exclusive content which updates once a week + Some HD vids + A slew of nonexclusive material (1000's of pic sets and vids covering softcore, HC, lez, IR, etc.) Cons: - Painfully slow download speeds - Navigation and search is poor especially when dealing with nonexclusive material - Exclusive material quality is only average - Incomplete model directory and scene tags Bottom Line: I find this strange to say but the nonexclusive content is what makes this site, not their original stuff and that ain't saying much. Here's the breakdown: ORIGINAL CONTENT: 5 sites all link together. Pics come in at 800x1200 and all have zips - pics appear to be HD screen caps and aren't as complete as the vids. Vids come in streaming, 820x480 and 1280x720 HD and include clips and full scenes. The download speeds suck, around 150 kb/sec. The 820 and 1280 sized vids (roughly 700 mb and 1 gig in size) are almost impossible to download due to the length of time it takes. The quality is only average. You get iffy lighting and production but and the girls are teens/20's but only average looking. There is only one update each week between the five sites. Most only have about 12 sets so far. NONEXCLUSIVE MATERIAL: This was the best part of the site. There are literally 1000's of photos sets and vids from about 15 to 20 production houses. You also get access to 380 DVDS but those are pretty old titles. Three big problems here. First, navigation is a pain. You can only jump 5 pages at most - not cool when dealing with this volume. Second, search is limited. You can search by about 20 categories. Then you can search by tags within categories. Tags and categories and model directory are all incomplete and sometimes mixed up (you get teens in the MILF section, some HC sets don't appear in the HC category, etc.) Also, porn stars who have multiple names require multiple searches - no cross referencing. Third, you don' know what you're getting unto you dig into it. Pic sizes range from 600 to 2500, you can only find out by clicking on pics to see what you can get before you try to zip or view further. Vids are similar, you don't know if it's partial scenes or full scenes and the quality and sizes are all over the board (no HD nonexclusive vids though). Couple this "hunt and peck" search method with the slow speeds and it's a royal pain in the ass. As a plus, you get a lot of major production stuff (at times it looked like a Twistys or PaulMarkham or LegSex clone site) and you get Devils Film shots and other good stuff. So there is good stuff there but you have to spend a lot of time looking for it although you can search by production house if you want. If they shelled out some coin for some servers and bandwidth and improved their search and navigation this site could easily score in the 80's. As it exists now, I can't really recommend it. If you do join you get the option of a $10 per month for life discount when you cancel but there's nothing here you can't really see within the trial period unless you plan on downloading a lot ... in which case it may take your lifetime to get it all ;) 01-02-09  01:53pm Replies (0) Review 44 Brazzers (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + 22 sites and growing of exclusive hardcore content + No DRM, No DL limits + Multiple daily updates, nearly 2000 scenes throughout the network + Good search function across whole network + Very good user interface + All scenes have vids and pics (pics have zip) + Scenes actually have story lines although acting is, well, about average for pornstars + 40 bonus sites (nonexclusive third party movie clips, not really worth it but it's there) Cons: - Pics are a bummer coming in at 900x600 - Video quality is just OK - Too many pics in sets but they're getting better (new stuff has 700-1000 pics per set) - 8 of the network sites no longer update - Some minor technical problems - Quality is only OK but certainly not amateur - Smallish opaque watermark but it sometimes gets in the way of the action Bottom Line: I reviewed this site 10 mos. ago but recently rejoined and I'm re-reviewing as I was too harsh on my initial take. For the uninitiated, this is a large network focusing on the Sir Mix-a-Lot school of porn (big booty and big busts). I'm not really a fan of the genre but there is enough content to satisfy just about everyone: they have big tit, big butt, anal, teen, interracial, schoolgirl and milf content. For those into American girl booty, silicone and tats, it's probably about the best site around for you. PHOTOS: I'm a photo guy and so all I can say is that you join here for the vids. For some reason, the "Walmart's of Porn" (Brazzers, Newsensations, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica -- they make their money on volume while the quality is spotty) all seem to go small with the pics (900x600). You get too many landscape shots here with a lot of dead space (hint, turn the camera sideways and zoom in a bit more). What is frustrating here is that some sets have random 1350x900 shots so they obviously know how to make them. Some shots are a bit grainy and out of focus but overall they are OK for the size. VIDEOS: Vids come in WMV, Mpeg1, Mpeg4, and Ipod/psp formats and have a streaming option. The vids are not hi-def and come in clips or full length. They average about 30 min. long and are about 300-400 megs in size. Screen size is 640x480. Sort of like the pics, sometimes they get too much "dead space" in the shots but for the most part they are well done and entertaining with no talking camera men (yay). I would say this site has the best user interface I've seen on a porn site. You can rate each scene and post comments. They have a "personal favorites" function too. There is a user forum with a ton of postings although it's mostly "Beavis & Butthead" level commentary. There are discount (tastefully small) ads for other sites with good prices. There is a very good search function with multiple search options available. I did have some small technical issues: a few browser crashes, some sets had pics that didn't match the thumbnails, some dead links and pages that wouldn't load but most of these were overcome. As an aside, I was happy to see Nicole Sheridan come out of retirement for a hot new scene here. I'm scoring this site an 86 for two reasons. The main issue is quality. Like I said, Brazzer's has the Wal-Mart mentality of porn: they produce a lot and have reasonable membership fees with frequent discounts but they skimp on the quality. They're getting better but still have a ways to go. With HD vids and hi-rez pics, I'd put a score of 90 or more on this site. The other reason is that it does get a bit stale. A lot of scenes seem alike, performers appear in multiple genres, and the girls they use are usually not top shelf "hottie" talent. Like I said, there is enough here for most anyone to get their money's worth for a month. It's not the best site but it's certainly worth a membership to check it out. 12-10-08  10:19pm Replies (4) Review 45 Only 3X (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Daily updates back to July '06 + No DRM + Good sized pics (most 1600x1065 or larger) and all have zips + Many HD vids (1280 wmv) and rest come in up to 512 or 640 wmv + Some exclusive content and a good content mix (about 2/3 HC and the rest is lez and solo) + Decent $15 month discount through TBP Cons: - Navigation and technical issues caused unnecessary pain and suffering - Lots of nonexclusive photo sets and partial sets - Quality can vary from OK to very good - Not DL manager friendly - Issues with having to keep logging in - Incomplete model directory - Large-ish opaque watermark in lower right cornor on all pics and some vids Bottom Line: The bottom line here is that this site initially comes across as being in the same general family as 1byday or Pixandvideo but it's really more the red headed step child as it ain't getting, or giving, enough love and is stuck with the second tier material. When you log in you can view the material by model directory, some general categories or the monthly calendar layout. The model directory is incomplete so it's easiest to view by the calendar. You don't know if a certain day is a pic or vid unless you hold your browser pointer over it (files ending in F = photo, V = vid and A = both although there are very few pics to see in these). There were also a few other technical glitches I came across but nothing too bad. Click on a day and new window pops up (must turn off pop-up blocker). Then you select the vid size or photo. Sometimes you get another window, sometimes not. This makes it ill sutied to DL managers. Don't open any other windows or make browser changes because you'll be logged out. Don't leave the site unattended for more than 10 minutes or you get logged out. After a few hours you'll get logged out. Each time you have to circle back to where you left off. Photos. Most of the photos are nonexclusive except for the photos that have matching vid sets (most sets don't have pics and vids, just one or the other). The nonexclusive stuff ranges from the older and more obscure stuff not many have seen to the stuff on every megasite. Some of the nonexclusive stuff gets pixeled at the 1600 level. The exclusive sets can be incomplete in comparison to the vids and are smaller (most come in at around 60 to 80 pics). There are some HD pic sets (3500x2300) but you'll be pressed to find more than 20 per set and they download seperately and copy the the regular resolution pics of the set so it's more of a novelty than an attraction. Videos. The vids are pretty good except for the first few months were quality is average. Pretty much all the vids come in up to 512 or 640 wmv and the download speeds are OK. The quality on the vids is generally better than the pics and there are more vids than photo sets on this site. There are more HD vids with the newer material (2008). The updates (daily) vary. Some months you get a bunch of pics, others a bunch of vids. When the photo and vid sets match, the "mate" set can be weeks or months apart. The actors are all euro models except for some of the nonexclusive stuff. Most of the women are attractive but not many total hotties like the more premium sites. It claims to be brutally HC but there's really nothing too brutal about it but there is some anal and dp action. Overall, the site isn't bad considering the price and the amount of content. If you can get over the technical issues it's not bad but the quality does vary, especially on pics. I wanted to give a higher score when I first joined but for now an 83 seems appropriate in my book. 11-19-08  04:57pm Replies (2) Review 46 Euro Pornstars (0) 82.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + Good $10, 5 day full access trial through TBP + No DRM + Daily Updates (1 scene or set per day) + Pics go up 2300x3500 with multiple sizes and multiple zip formats + Full preview allowed before joining + HD movies (HD in quality but not size) + Good search function, easy navigation Cons: - Nonoriginal content - No more bonus sites - Some pic sets get grainy in largest sizes Bottom Line: This is a site that has loads of potential but can't quite get there in terms of the final score. This is probably more of a pic site than a movie site which is fine by me. There are about 375 picture sets which have 140 to 200 pics ranging from 1000 to 3500 pix (you can zip in three different sizes). The size is great but some sets get grainy. About 20% are hardcore, 15% lesbian and the rest are solo. Pics also have a slideshow function. The vids, about 80, have a few percent more hc scenes than the photos. They come in at 640x480 with a 4200 stream rate (my download speeds were generally good). The quality is very good. You can download clips or full scenes (full scenes come it around 500mb sizes) and they run about 20 to 30 minutes. They offer daily updates, good search and a calendar look showing the updates of the day for each month if you like. Navigation is easy. They also offer a great preview where you can look at the vids available and every thumbnail in every photoset. With so much great stuff why not a great score? The answer is the nonexclusive content. They rely heavily on Viv Thomas material so if you've been a member there you've seen a lot of this. I recognized almost all the hc sets from Viv and other sites like Twistys and Karupspc and Sexybabes. Most of the softcore looked familiar as well. Some of the pics didn't stand up to being enlarged so big and some colors got a bit fatigued as well in the process. Given that this is a Newsensations spinoff I think the score could have been helped by tossing in a couple of NS sites as bonuses. The bonus sites mentioned by earlier reviews now seem to be gone. If this site had some original content and/or some decent bonus material I'd be pushing the score to near 90 but the nonexclusive nature hurts in this case. If you haven't been to Vivthomas or some of the more mainstream porn sites recently then I think this is good site to visit. For those who have I think it's a question if you want the bigger pics (Vivthomas doesn't put his pic resolution as high as they do here) or to update your collection. I don't see any reason to stay for longer than the trial given the lack of exclusive material unless you don't really have any of this material. 11-06-08  12:53pm Replies (0) Review 47 The Hardcore Network (0) 74.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + Decent 2 day, $5 full access trial through TBP + Mostly exclusive material (more than 50% I'd say) + No DRM + 5 sites have HD video + 13 sites to choose from + Network wide search function for girls, acts, etc. Cons: - Primarily a video site, although they advertise pics they generally aren't that good - Quality varies from excellent to total crap - Prechecked membership boxes on signup form - Some of the usual 3rd party bonus sites but can't view the content (lure to sign you up only) - Pics have no zips and all pics for the set appear on one page and individual pics come up in separate window - Sporadic updates Bottom Line: This is a network that doesn't quite know where it's going. It has some more mainstream sites but then throws in some more extreme sites. The network advertises pictures but for the most part the quality is average at best while sizes go from 1600x1200 to useless small screencaps. The vids are the most consistent in quality and quantity with the standard being 640x480 wmv with decent download speeds and some HD sites tossed in. The following are the sites I'd score in the 70's: Iloveyouceleste; Iloveyoumya; Iloveyoumelanie; Iloveyoumadison. All sites have about 32 vids and 22 pic sets (1000x720). The vids go HD here (up to 1440x1080). All the girls are relatively attractive and they do solo, HC, toys and lesbo. The girls often appear in each other's sites so there is a lot of overlap. Each also has a pointless and brainless diary. Attackmyass. Has pics, 35 sets, up to 1500x1000 but most are 1000x750). Vids, about 80, are average. Mostly outside content with known pornstars. Pleasebegentle. Younger pornstar sex with 66 vids and only a couple of photosets. Vids are average but good quality. Chopsticksluts. Nonoriginal asian porn with average quality at best. The following, in my opinion, fall at or below the "Mendoza Line" score of 70: Pornstarsolos: 77 average sized vids and 60 pic sets (most 800x1200). Nothing original here and some photo sets are just partials. Asssmoothie: This I don't quite get. You see girl, girl strips, girl fires up the blender, girl lays on floor and dumps goo in her booty, girl pushes goo out the tail pipe and then it goes down the hatch. Breakfast of champions, mmmm. This is the same setup for virtually every set; all 150 vids and 52 pic sets. They have HD vids here which is a waste because if you've seen one you've seen 'em all. Swirliegirls: High school nerd abuse? Not really, just another site I don't get. Every scene (25 pic and 25 vid which are OK) has a girl in a toilet doing some violent bj stuff and then getting her head flushed. Tries to be brutal but most of it isn't. Again, everything is the same in every scene. Herlastfuck: This is like a slow motion car wreck, you know it's going to hurt but you just have to peek. The vids are average at best and the pics are worthless. It's all seriously ancient eastern euro women looking for some rubles after the Soviet Union collapsed and their pensions disappeared. I couldn't bring myself to wach the 86 yr old woman give a bj. Fat and nasty is the theme here. There are a few more sites here which, again, have varying quality and pretty standard content and rate high 60's or low 70's but they don't merit any real discussion. With such a range of quality, only OK photos, and sporadic updates I couldn't score this site in the 80's. Given that so much is average, average be the score. I did the 2 day trial and that was more than enough to take what I wanted and get out. Don't bother with the month here 11-05-08  05:00pm Replies (3) Review 48 Thai Chix (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + 100's of vids and 100k photos + Many photos come in at 1500x1200 and all files have zip + No DRM + Good customer service + 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP + Updates daily + No watermarks (99% of the time) Cons: - Nonexclusive content - Mostly American asians, no Urabon and few "asian" women - Most vids come in clips - Many HC photo sets are incomplete - Quality varies - Navigation on a site this big needs work Bottom Line: Overall, I would have to say there is nothing special about this site. As the content is nonexclusive the quality of the photos and vids can vary. Like I noted, it's mostly American porn here although it gets more amateur and asian in the solo girl sections. Here's how it breaks down: PHOTOS: 360 HC, 130 Lesbian and 1000 solo sets all of which have zips. About half the photos come in at 1500x1200 and most of the rest come in at full screen (1020). Some of the photos are from screen caps so they can be grainy or blurry but most are pretty good but certainly not high def. A lot of the HC sets are incomplete and out of order or feature bj's only so there wasn't a lot to pick from there. A lot of the sets seemed the same to me after a while. VIDEOS: There are 3rd party links to full length dvd's and videos. Most of the vids are in their "in house" section. Here, the majority can only be download in clips. Most come sized in 320x240 for wmv and 640x480 for mpeg. It streamed for me at about 400 kps. The quality is mostly good but can vary. There are no screen caps. Navigation is OK and there is some advertising on the site. They have a search function that is just OK (can't search by scene content or body type) and limited model information. Customer support is good and it bills through ccbill. While the site updates daily most of the updates are softcore. You get one vid and one photo set a day it looks like. HC and lesbian sets/scenes update infrequently. If you've had limited exposure to asian porn the site is decent. If you're a fan of asian porn there probably isn't much here you haven't seen before or would want to keep. I got everything I wanted within the 3 days so I couldn't see staying for month. Overall, average site, average score. Book it Dan-o. 10-31-08  05:23pm Replies (0) Review 49 18 Eighteen (0) 82.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available + No DRM + All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips + Updates 5 days a week + Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP Cons: - Navigation is a pain but tolerable - Primarily a photo site but there vids available - Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel - Some advertising on site to buy their products - Older vids are very big and some only come in clips - Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download Bottom Line: 18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit. Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything. All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images. The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month. You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material. Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more. I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked. I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content. I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though. 10-24-08  05:44pm Replies (0) Review 50 Tasty Pass (0) 77.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Great TBP full trial prices ($1 for 2 days, $12.50 for a month) - 8 network sites focusing on eastern euro girls plus some standard 3rd party feeds - Large photos (up to 1400 x 920) - Videos are generally of good quality but only average sized (450 x 335 at the highest end) - No DRM - Content pretty much exclusive but I did find a couple of sets that I had seen elsewhere Cons: - Content is mostly average and only about 4 of the network sites are worth looking at - Have to re-enter username/password for each site - No zips for photos - Some advertising on some of the sites - I had some issues with the billing company here but they were resolved - Photo updates don't come very often and the sites update vids a few times per month Bottom Line: Overall, this isn't a bad network. I joined on the cheapo $1 for 2 days trial (you have to join an individual site, not the network to get this deal). I will note that going this route will result in a $40 monthly membership charge if you don't cancel (obviously this is where they're looking to make money). You also need to login under the heading "full membership", not "trial membership" on the login page. Why? I have no clue but this is how it worked. When I went to cancel through the processing company (crmedialtd.com) they did not recognize my member info. I used the on-line chat function and got cancelled but my member info never appeared on the billing processor's site so this might be a red flag. Also, be aware that if you sign up for the trial, there are other "prechecked" trials on the bottom of the signup page; a nasty practice in my book. Overall, the content wasn't bad. I found that I liked tasty18and19, bridesonblacks, and tastydildos the best. There are some solo model sites as well but exoticsforme pretty much covered them in his review so I won't delve into them here. Teensonblacks and the mature site were worthless. You also get access to 9 3rd party vido feed sites which are nonexclusive obviously. Tasty18and19.com was pretty good with 77 photo sets and 82 movie sets with about 1/3 being hardcore. All photos were large, had small watermarks and were generally good quality. The girls were all pretty good looking. You also get access on this site to 420 streaming full lenght dvd's (nonexclusive) and 36 amateur girl vids (only downloadable in 2 minute clips). This site has the most content and most frequent updates of the network. Bridesonblacks has no relationship to wedding day hookups. It's just an interracial site. They had about 30 photo sets and 60 vids. The newest photos were 1400x930 but about 2/3 were 1020x700. The girls ranged from young to mature. The photosets seemed to have stopped updating and the vids rarely update. I will note that all the vids can now be downloaded as full scenes. This site definitely had more of an amateur feel in terms of quality of the material. Overall the quality was decent but certainly not high definition. Almost all the material is exclusive and the women are generally pretty good looking. I pretty much saw all I needed to on the 2 day trial but if you like the content the no zips will slow you down so the monthly $12.50 membership might be the way to go. Either way you go there isn't a lot of updating so there is no need to stay longer. I'm scoring this a 77 because while the quality is decent there is not a ton of it and the updates don't come all that often on most sites. The billing processor problem/"gotcha" also counted against them here. It's a decent network but not the cream of the crop. 09-19-08  05:56pm Replies (4) Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.37 seconds.