Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
VideoBox
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great amount of Content
- Great organisation of content
- Great usability of the site |
| Cons: |
- If anything negative can really be mentioned, all dvds that are added are relatively dated
- Movies can't be downloaded as individual full files |
| Bottom Line: |
The really great thing that differentiates Videobox from any other adult site is its interface.
Most sites feature a '90s style, slow, cluttered, non interactive interface that has been designed in a couple of weeks by some bored guy hoping for his task to be over fast so that he could go back playing World of Warcraft.
Videobox, instead, has the most sophisticated interface I've ever seen on a video site.
Movies and scenes are part of an extremely accessible and detailed database. Scenes can be downloaded with a mechanism that allows you to just download the segment of the file that you have previewed that you might be interested in.
Download options are more than enough, and can fit to most kinds of internet connections.
Dvd-quality files are probably the best quality ever seen for videos on a porn site but they are...useless. Each film would often add up to more than a couple of GB if downloaded at the highest quality.
The variety of movies is also a plus: every niche is represented and contains more than one can download in months. |
|
06-27-07 04:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
My Mom's Fucking Black Zilla
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Shane Diesel
- Many, interesting scenes |
| Cons: |
- Almost no downloads
- Pictures are not zipped
- Less than ideal site design
- The format is extremely repetitive |
| Bottom Line: |
Very few things to say:
Scenes are interesting, and no other site offers anything like that.
At this site they seem to have noticed it, and decided to make files available for download only the very week they're posted. Which means, a one month subscription only gives you right to roughly four downloaded scenes. All the rest of the content is streaming only.
Pictures, also, are not zipped and hard to download.
In other words, once your subscription expires you are left with very little in your hands.
Were these restrictions taken away, the site would jump immediately 15 points up. |
|
06-16-07 11:13pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
18 Interracial
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
– A reasonable amount of material
– Girls are reasonably sexy and "possibly" eighteen
– Network access |
| Cons: |
– Access is terrible
– Scenes are NOT exclusive
– Action is just mediocre |
| Bottom Line: |
To begin with, content is not 'exclusive'. This site's content is shot for ordinary 4-5 scenes flics and most of it has been around for a long long time.
Getting to the main point, I can cope with non-exclusive content and less-than-optimal quality. What really annoys me is that when I access a porn site I just want to get in, see clearly what I can download, and get it on my computer fast and ready to be consumed. I want a few clicks to be enough to complete the whole procedure and at the end have three, four scenes running – and running fast – on my download manager.
I don't want to have anything to do with annoying interfaces, unwanted streaming players, confusional download options or anything of the kind.
I don't want to confront myself with lousy preview screens that don't show me exactly who's starring in that scene and what the action is about.
I don't want to solve riddles and puzzles or to lose time in any way to put files together when I have downloaded them. I don't even want to have to fight to download them from the website in the first place.
It is evident that who made this website doesn't like people like me. They don't like people to want to access easily to all the content and cancel the membership when they're done. They want people to have a hard life getting the content they paid for.
Useless to say, these guys don't like me and I don't like them; I cancelled my membership after a couple of hours since the subscription. |
|
06-16-07 10:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Site design is light and provides easy access.
- There's a good deal of stuff in it. |
| Cons: |
- Many, but not describable in just one line |
| Bottom Line: |
All in all, Spring Thomas is an interracial reality site where storylines are based on the constant humiliation of white men and of their penis size, while showing how great lovers black men are.
Various visualisations of this concept are shown throughout the site.
Some people think that there is something wrong with watching porn. i disagree but think it's arguable.
What I really have no doubts about is that if someone enjoys watching white guys getting physically and psychologically humiliated and sometimes licking off black men's sperm – well, he must really have some issues with his sexuality.
Maybe it's just that the Spring Thomas site has so far been wrongly catalogued as an interracial site whereas it's more of a BDSM site, but I don't find its videos to suit "standard" interracial or hardcore tastes.
Another thing I really hate about the site is Spring herself. She's the uttermost and most annoying personification of the dumb, self-engrossed american girl.
And she's not a teen anymore since a long time. |
|
02-03-07 06:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Maybe the biggest interracial archive on the net
- Featured material is exclusive and quite various.
- Video quality is high and scenes also come in one-piece only downloadable files |
| Cons: |
- New movies are somewhat not really interesting
- Site design is terribly old-fashioned and heavy
- Some of the girls that are advertised on the homepage are not actually featured in the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Blacks on Blondes used to be the best, biggest and most followed interracial site on the net. Between 2000-2004 it featured most of the best and most famous interracial porn chicks around. In the last few years, though, after a new wave of reality-style interracial sites have emerged BOB's importance in the interracial scenery has diminished, and the guys who run the site started a sudden wave of changes in their style to adapt it to the new trends.
If before the average movie was focused on showing very hard sex in expensive Californian houses with little dialogues and little staged parts (if any), now the main focus is in creating pretending-to-be reality situation with unlikely dialogues.
The quality of the sex, also, has strongly declined, and anal is now rarely featured.
What I find more obnoxious in this new style is the dodgy and explicitely fake reality style. Porn is itself fiction, creating a further layer of (very bad quality) fiction on it just makes everything just not as appealing.
If in the old BoB style making interracial movies was about showing well-endowed black men fucking white girls with their incredible stamina, now it's only about white girls saying "Your big black cock is so much bigger than my white boyfriend's cock" or stuff like that for most of the movie, even when they should just shut up for God's sake.
These comments apart, BoB is still a fairly good quality interracial site, well worth a 1 month subscription. |
|
02-03-07 05:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Movies are really more than enough
- Every single chick is as hot as hell
- Easy user interface
- Pictures are very good quality (big & professionally shot) |
| Cons: |
- Download speed could be better
- No variety in the scripts
- Authors should understand that "more moaning" does not equal "more realism" |
| Bottom Line: |
A quite good site for real anal lovers, but not a really great one for all the others.
Personally, a one month subscription was more than enough.
Videos are very high quality - 250-300Mbs each, too - but colours are not very vivid and this spoils the very colourful and baroque costumes, locations and make up.
Scripts are non-existent, though (usually just a chick showing up, making some not quite realistic horny expressions while showing off and then getting fucked by 'n' guys without saying a word), and the lack of 'contextualisation' makes movies not that interesting.
It is a pity, that such amazing and girls are wasted on everything-but-creative mediocre quality videos.
It must be said, though, all girls in the site are real anal pros and take some amazing cocks. |
|
01-15-07 09:51am
Replies (1)
|
|
