Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
There are some photos of Venus Knight (aka Angelica Costello)
There are some photos of Venus Knight
There are some photos of Venus Knight
At least there is no scam billing. They take your money and then they take off.
That's all the Pro's I can come up with. Seriously
Cons:
Dead site with no activity.
No customer support at all
Very sloppy navigation
Hardly any content
What's there is lousy quality
Bottom Line:
Bottom line, forget this site.
I signed up because they sent me an email that offered a 2 month non-recurring at $19.99. Being a Venus Knight fan, BIG TIME, I figured that was a great deal although PU/TBP had no G2 at all about the site.
As soon as I accessed the site for the first time I went to work to find stuff about Venus. It took a while but I finally found a few photos, No videos, just photos.
Having committed my money I thought I'd see what else was there. Yes there was some low quality stuff but none of it was worth previewing, let alone downloading.
When you consider that you can get a ton more material on Venus Knight on Twistys for the same investment, you will conclude this site is a waste of time and money.
To give you some idea how bad it is, I'm as tight as they come when it's my money, so when I sign up for a site, I drain as much as I want as quickly as possible so I can cancel and move on within the first month. In this case, after day one when I determined what a crap site it was, I don't think I revisited it more that 3 or 4 times and that was just to see if I missed something the first time or if the webmaster woke up and worked on it.
Why a score of 51 and not 50? Remember, I'm a Venus Knight fan and there were a few photos of Venus Knight that I did not have nestled away on my harddrive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I finally gave in and signed onto Bikini-Pleasure after checking out the free photos they make available. (See www.preview.bikini-paradise.com)It was pretty much as I expected.
The site is totally focused on very nice looking babes wearing (sorta) teeny tiny bikinis ranging from maybe 1 square inch of fabric covering the pussy to crotchless numbers (example, costume pearls arranged in a triangle that leave the pussy totally unprotected.
The site is almost a fashion show of teeny tiny beach wear and in almost every case winds up with the model being totally starkers (that means bare assed naked to you Yanks).
There are a few instances where the babe plays with her labia lips (sometimes where they are flapping around a micro bikini, and other times after the bikini has been removed.
The site is about 50/50 between videos (superbly hi def) and photos (are all hi def with three size options).
Mammaries are also exposed in the same manner as the pussy, usually with fully erect nipples
Cons:
Absolutely no insertions of any kind. Makes Met Art stuff seem totally pornographic and salacious in comparison.
Many of the scenes have two or four babes but there's no interaction between them nor is there even a hint of any sexual interest.
The majority of videos are of photo sessions and include a lot of camera clicking and flashes which becomes somewhat distracting.
I saw no models with whom I'm familiar, with the sole exception of the always lovely Blue Angel who has a batch of material.
Bottom Line:
The standard scene is on a beach and many scenes are in the same venue with the same babes. Most show people in the background ranging from naked old gents (reminds me of the old nudist park material back in the day...without the volleyball) to little kids and normal (not physically attractive) middle aged ladies.
Even with the featured ladies walking around with their boobs and twats on full display for all to see, no one seems to notice. Thus I suspect the shooting venue is probably a Mediterranean beach somewhere like the Costa Del Sol (Spain) or the French Riviera.
In no case is there any blurring out of the faces of the folks who were on the beach.
The site has a very large volume of material and zipped photo groups so draining the site is not a real possibility except if you want to devote an entire month to the project.
In summary, if you enjoy great looking babes (almost) wearing scandalously teeny-tiny bikinis and enjoy closeup shots of pussy and some titties, you may enjoy the site. But you won't see much in the way of ass shots or any fingering or toy activity.
The material would easily pass the censorship limitations of Playboy in the 70's and 80's and would be totally OK for any other soft core publications back in the 20th Century.
I like the site and was not expecting anything more than I got when I signed up. Navigation is simple and downloading is clean and efficient.
My score of 84 is based on the site delivering exactly what it promised, providing content with consistently very high quality stuff and a very large bunch of stuff to choose from. The site updates frequently, usually daily.
Using the PU scoring criteria, the site had no variety in terms of shooting venues and themes and was too "puritan" in how they had the models behave.
Also the only males in any of the scenes were older gents lounging nearby totally oblivious to the naked ladies in their vicinity.
One last thing. I've never seen a bikini bottom with a zipper. in a few cases the damn thing was so small, the labia lips hung out on the sides even when zipped. I can only imagine who it must have felt if the model was careless when zipping up.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great video quality in recent additions. (Bang Bros. affiliation)
- All natural models.
- Excellent camerawork and lighting
- Good assortment and getting bigger (one new video per week)
- Each video has 60 minutes of content, 40 or more minutes nude/hardcore.
Cons:
- Same 3-part sequence for each model. No variety. Scene 1- Pickup; Scene 2 - Solo; Scene 3 Hardcore (or just BJ in a few cases). Hardcore always vaginal, sometimes anal as well.
- Same stud does them all. He's good (lets the babe show all her stuff) but no variety
Bottom Line:
If you love gorgeous women with large, natural breasts captured on video by a great tit loving cameraman, you'll love this series. You'll recognize several of the models who are quite popular in porn such as Jane Darling, Anastasia Christ, Sandra DeMarco, Tiffany Rousso and others.
Partner sites vary in quality but provide a good value add. Best one is Big Ass Adventures.
Heed the TBP warning. The "trial" membership gives you only the first of 3 scenes, which seldom has much nudity and no hardcore. The site has 1 minute (FREE!) trailers for each model that are far better than what you'll get with a trial membership.
Best move is to sign up for a full month and give it a full shot. You won't regret it if you're a bit tit fan.
(I was a member for 3 months then cancelled a few weeks ago just because I'd pretty much seen all the content and downloaded (NO DRM!) the ones I wanted to keep. I plan to rejoin in about a month or so after several new models have been added.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
From my previous review [current review is in brackets]:
Pros: Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models. [Nothing at all added since the first review.]
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
[Now part of the New Sensations network, so the entire NS network is now available for $15, a great price.]
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month. [See above.]
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.[Ditto.]
Galleries are Zip downloadable [Ditto]
No DRM [Ditto]
Cons:
Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined. [Now part of New Sensations. No longer a "con" because of that.]
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months. [No updates since 7/26/2007]
Videos not top quality, slow loading [Ditto]
Photos are quite small [Ditto]
Content not dated. [Ditto]
Bottom Line:
The site is probably wrapping up its existence. [Not true. It's dormant and hasn't changed, but it still tries to recruit new business.]
Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download mgr, it won't take more than a few hours to drain it dry. [Ditto.]
NEW: I'm back on the site because I signed up for New Sensations this morning and this site was a part of the network.
I reduced my score because the site is dormant and based on what is now available on other sites, this site is now a total pass.
It gets 6 points over minimum only because it has single scenes of Natasha Nice and Sara Stone, two of my favorite big titted babes and 3 or 4 other scenes that are worthy of download.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month.
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.
Galleries are Zip downloadable
No DRM
Several "Non-Exclusive" sites, whatever that means, with just streaming vids only - no downloads from the non-exclusive sites, no pix.
Cons:
Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined.
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months.
Videos not top quality, slow loading
Photos are quite small
Content not dated.
Bottom Line:
The site is probably wrapping up its existence. Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download manager, you could drain all the content on the three sites in a month. But there are enough much better sites that skipping this one is no big lost opportunity.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons:
No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads
* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line:
The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.
The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.
Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.
I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.
Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.
Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.
I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.
I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge inventory of exclusive content.
Emphasis on big breasts
Recent videos are usually well designed and good resolution
Cons:
Photo quality and quantity could be better
Uses error filled DRM. DRM permits no access after cancelling membership.
Customer Service is virtually non-existent.
Frequent broken links and discontinued content remains in indexes
Bottom Line:
Has its moments, but has deteriorated severely over the last 12 - 18 months. Unless the new owners (Danni Ashe is no longer in the game) step up to the plate and make some big changes, the site is no longer ready for prime-time.
Follow-Up:
Since I wrote the review, Danni.com removed the DRM (finally!) but all previously downloaded material can no longer be viewed. Connection problens are the worst in the biz, but the more recent material is excellent. I came back to give them another chance and increased my rating from 75 to 85. I get the sense that they are trying hard to recover the ground they lost over the years with DRM. The score will go up more when they let members log on more than 50% of the time...and access all content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Superior video quality, very sharp
-Excellent, and large, inventory of models, genres
-Some anal and DP masturbation
-Sure to satisfy those who like solo masturbation by uniformly gorgeous ladies.
-Top notch production values - good lighting & editing
-TBP has a special deal $9.95 per month. Major discount
-No DRM!
Cons:
-Site has zip down loads for photos (excellent quality) but you must be a subscriber for at least 30 days to have access to the Zip feature. My scure dropped from 93 to 89 because of that.
-Single focus is as advertised, so there is not much variety in the situations and themes.
-Navigation is a bit clumsy but not awful.
-Some content is not exclusive.
-Small but permanent watermark appears in lower right of all videos.
Bottom Line:
If your preferences include masturbation in its various forms, from finger play to dildo and veggie insertions, this site is definitely for you. If you are into solo strip tease, this site is also recommended. Crisp, clear camerawork and great camera angles throughout. The Best Porn has an incredible special price right now ($9.95 vs. reg price of $24.95) and the TBP team posted positive reviews. The price and the reviews caused me to sign up just to check it out. I'm happy I did, and I may stick around for another month or two if only to be able to use the deferred zip feature.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
OK, I'm now in my second month. I like the site a lot and had a few chats with the webmaster that make me like it more.
See my first impressions in my comments when I first signed up. (I questioned the high ($35/month) price tag and whether it was worth it.)
After I got used to the unusual but efficient navigation, I'm finding a lot more good stuff than I expected initially.
-Easy to use search functions. It's got a decent user evaluation system and has user comments about each model/scene.
-Nice commentary is provided by the site for each scene. They even identify their idea of the best scenes by embedding a small check mark in the commentary.
- Gorgeous models and locales. Each set identifies the shooting location even though the locations aren't significant to the primary purpose of the site.
There currently are 1,077 sets (as of 9/4/15), each with, normally, 3 or four separate parts. Many models have just one full set but several also have multiples
Cons:
- Some of the scenes are slow (languid, almost) which is OK for a short spell, but they can be achingly boring. (How long can you watch a babe's snatch while she writhes around on her back?) Reminds me of the First Time Video site where they can spend a lot of time on a single activity that makes me go for the fast forward button.
To their credit, the site mentions such situations in their commentary so if you're like me (no patience), you'll like this aspect.
There is no multi-month pricing so make sure you can handle the $35 per month price tag if you plan on sticking around awhile. I'd love to but I'm afraid my budget cannot handle it.
Bottom Line:
The site has a disarmingly large amount of content, which I'm still going through, but so far I haven't seen a single male doing anything to any of these babes. That's not to say they aren't working the hell out of a wide variety of "toys."
For those into solo peeing, there's quite a bit of that in this site. There are one or two scenes with two models involved in some water sports.
If you like seeing babes stuff unusual stuff up their twats you won't be disappointed. Ice cream, pearls, ice cubes, bananas (squished inside) and other stuff.
There are some scenes featuring creative uses for panties, stuffing and heavy duty wedgies, for example.
Out of the 1077 sets there are only 25 sets with any lesbian action and no males anywhere.
Being an aficionado of material that explores every inch of solo gorgeous babes in HD, I'm really OK with that.
My score reflects my personal preference for the content provided. I don't consider price in my evaluation but if I did I would dock them a few points for their comparatively high price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Jana Jordan is the featured model, needless to say, and even when fully clothed she's still a "dy-no-mite" babe.
She is listed on the iadf.com data base as being 5'2" and 96 pounds, but she has the prettiest eyes and puffy nipples on top, a perfect pussy and an elegant pair of legs. And she loves to show off.
Jana, as far as I know, just does solo and lez stuff, but some of the lesbian material I've seen has been pretty nasty and never fails to transition Little Richard into Big Dick.
That's about it for the "pro's" ladies and gentlemen. The babe is the only thing going for this site. It sure ain't the content!
Worse, if you join this site to check out Jana's fine body parts, you'll be sorely disappointed. Go to one of the many "preview material" sites like freeones.com and you'll see a whole lot more of Jana than on this site.
Cons:
The site has a total of 9 short videos (the same number as stated in the TBP "site facts" page for this site). There are 4 wmv's, 3 mov's 2 mpg's totaling about 25 minutes of Jana showing her car, magic tricks, bunnies and silly crap but no pussy, no boob.
There are 61 photo sets (nothing zipped, but in this case who cares) where TBP's "site facts says there were 55+).
All 9 movies and 61 photo sets showed Jana fully clothed, a few in semi sexy poses in bikini underwear. There are about 5 photos where she has wet toilet paper squares covering her nipples in a manner that suggests that hers are a bit on the puffy side (one of her main assets).
The TBP "site facts" was last updated on 12-24-05, which means the site has been dormant for three years.
There are 5 G-rated photo sets of her "friends" as well, that left limp Little Richard asking me why I bothered. I had no answer so I went back to my FTV Girls download to make the poor little guy turn back into Big Dick.
Bottom Line:
This site is suitable for kids because there is no, I repeat, no material that isn't available on basic over the air broadcast TV. I wondered as I went through the material if it wasn't, in fact, created before Jana Jordan turned 18 because it wouldn't bother a censor or a lawyer in the strictest of situations.
This site got my cancellation about 1 hour and 45 minutes after enrolling because I had completed a review of all of its content in about an hour. That was, for me, the fastest time from sign up to cancellation ever. (My last record was with the Shay Laren site that has a whole Helluva lot better content. That one took me about two days to drain everything and be done with the site.)
The only reason I scored it a 51 is because, although they had the usual check box option to sign up for another of their sites, Lili Jensen.com, they had the decency to have left the box unchecked rather than the usual trick of pre-checking the box.
That should earn them 1 point over the minimum.
FINAL COMMENT: If you had any thoughts about signing up for JanaRocks.com, you should reconsider. Give your $15 to that guy standing at the bottom of the freeway off ramp with the cardboard sign. You'll at least feel like you accomplished something with your money.
(Boy, I need an attaboy for wasting my time and money. But it shows what torture I'll put myself through in my quest for the PU team! ;o))
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.
That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons:
Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line:
This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.
The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 15 sites as of this writing; 10 active and 5 "archival".
- 2 sites updated each weekday, no Sat or Sun updates
- Very easy going, frat party style to most of the videos
- While POV is excessive, a lot of the angles and details are outstanding
- Enjoyable concepts and fantasy stuff
- Lots and lots of gorgeous babes plus 3 ugly ones
- Models usually are into the fun which adds to their sex appeal
Cons:
- Videos are far too long. Way too much garbage is left in for reasons known only to the producers.
- The later updates are very high quality but some of the older stuff is hard to watch. It's a shame because the babes are gorgeous in many of the old ones.
- Ancillary features not well maintained. One example is that a Jane Darling video is listed on one site as #6 in the top rated list, but the link has been broken since I signed up
Bottom Line:
The site accesses for $23.95 per month which, considering the volume of material, isn't too bad a price.
The navigation is OK once you get used to it but at first it's difficult to figure out how to access all scenes involving a specific girl.
The BangBus series has some stuff that I don't find enjoyable. I'm sure degradation schtick appeals to some, like waving $100 for a bus side blow job or kicking a chick out with her face covered with goo in a homeless area as the Bus takes off and the guys giggling about that "stupid broad." (Given hat the girls all must sign a legal release this nonsense is all part of the act/fantasy, but it's still unnecessary.
After 1-1/2 months of membership, I'm still discovering new stuff and features, so I suggest you ration your time when surfing Oc Pass (also known as Bang Bros Network). There's an incredibly large quantity of stuff to check out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good selection of zaftig* ladies, mostly Caucasian. Most are naturally big boobed but some have had some surgical assistance. The vast majority of the models are gorgeous.
A few fatties but the vast majority are proportional.
Good assortment of photos with occasionally functioning zip downloads (see Cons). My estimate is 850 videos on the entire site with an average of 1 to 2 updates per week.
Reasonably simplistic, but accurate, navigation.
There are several models that appear on other sites (such as DDF) so the site seems to be willing to pay for better talent for short cameo type appearances.
*Webster's definition of zaftig - "of a woman: having a full rounded figure : pleasingly plump"
Cons:
Most (close to all) videos and photos are only focused on mammaries. So far I haven't found any examples of pussy shots of any kind let alone any B/G material. I'll acknowledge I haven't browsed through the entire site but if you want a site like Score with pussy tease and some heterosexual action, you'll be disappointed.
Cross selling on signup.
Some ads. Not overwhelming but still annoying.
Peddling separate sites of models that appear on the main site which really irritates me. If you have a model on your site, don't tease into buying a separate site to see more. Score does that too as do other sites, but it seems like Pin-Up files could be a preview site for its many solo model sites in it's inventory.
Most videos have music soundtracks. There isn't any significant action in any of the scenes so there wouldn't be much point in recording natural sounds. (How much oohing and ahhing is involved in taking off tops and occasionally squeezing a pair of big tits?)
Bottom Line:
Bottom line, I have been receiving a bunch of promotional emails peddling the site. I finally decided to bite and signed up to see if the promotional stuff was accurately representative of the actual content.
I didn't spend much so I don't feel shortchanged but I don't plan on renewing when my first month runs out.
The one positive benefit of the site is that it helped me enhance my listing of well built big titted models with good photos.
If you are a fan of well shaped and natural boobies, the site is worth a single month signup. But if you are like me where you enjoy nice floppers bouncing away in reverse cowgirl scenes while a stunt cock is rocking her socks, you will be disappointed.
My score is 74 because the promotional material did not "overpromise" but there's only so much one can enjoy girls pulling off t-shirts while wearing securely tight shorts (or slacks) that seem to be firmly fixed to their waists.
The 74 score meets TBP's guideline for 70-79, "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend."
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gets them young and fresh. This site is really an adjunct to the DDF Prod network and, IMO, is a place for them to share their "audition" shoots with their members. You can see some of their very popular babes looking quite young and, usually, without any "stage presence." As you might guess there normally is only one relatively brief shoot. Downloads are fast and reliable. The separate site has over 200 models, some with just photos, some with just videos and some with both.
Very easy navigation and a rudimentary search function where you can find babes by category: Solo, Hardcore, Blowjob, Big Tits and Legs.
In some cases there are some great shots and/or activity that one doesn't encounter in the professional DDF productions. Brief, but still quite good.
Updates posted 3 times a week.
Cons:
Many (most?) of their stuff is in low definition (which, I suppose, is consistent with these being audition shoots.
Lots of interviews, which is also expected, with inane questions and monosyllabic answers. Many of the interviews are hard to understand because of very heavy accents of both the interviewer and the model. In some cases the interviews are in their native Eastern European language.
There are no direct links to the DDF Prod site's inventory and in a few cases the names on the SVC model list differ from the names in DDF Prod (and in a few rare cases, to the name mentioned by the model herself during the interview.
Not all the models on the DDF Prod sites are included in the Sex Video Casting site.
The SVC shoots are not included in the model directory on the main DDF Prod site. (Not a real problem. Just reporting the facts.) However the updates page on DDF Prod do include the Sex Video updates.
Bottom Line:
I may be strange but I really like the audition videos. Yes they are plotless and all have essentially the same, "what is your name" start, with a model showing a variety of apprehensive attitudes. In a few cases (very few) the model has a persona of self confidence but most times they give the impression that they aren't sure they really want to be doing this.
The shoots range from short clips of the newbie just stripping down to nude to full, hot and heavy hardcore. That's one of the positives because one never knows what may be coming up. And being part of the "discovery phase" of a truly gorgeous babe's career is always fun.
Responses to direction (such as "take off your sweater," or "show me your pussy") are almost comically rapid; sort of like when a cop pulls you over and asks for your license.
Bottom line. I don't recommend joining this site individually because it will be disappointingly repetitive and the babes are not up to their full blown quality, both in appearance and in "stage presence." Also the quality in production values and in the actual video quality is not up to DDF standards. But I strongly recommend joining DDF Prod and later finding this site to enjoy the first shoots of your favorite babes.
I wish more network sites would do this.
My score of 83 is an amalgamation of subjective opinion (I really enjoy the raw footage aspects for some perverse reason) and objective evaluation (the content is not of the same caliber as the material on the rest of the DDF Prod sites by any means) with a 6 point enhancement solely because it is an integral part of the network and not trying to be a self sufficient site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A group of 9 sites, 8 active (see below) and one inactive with quality ranging from superb to adequate.
- Outstanding babes with soft core more dominant than hardcore.
- Reliable. No site downs in over 1 year as a member and only a few broken links.
- Responsive customer service (for minor issues)
- Most photos (all posted in last few years) are in zip downloads.
- Exclusive content (as far as I can tell)
- Easy navigation.
- Babelicious has some good features - see sparate review
Cons:
- Older content lower resolution; some without zip.
- Ambiguous model names. Same babe in Sexy Babes has a different name in Eurobabez, for example. Others are fictitious names for known pornstars.
- Inactive users forum that is not monitored by webmaster. (But see Babelicious, below).
- UserID and Passwords required for each site; no unified log on.
Bottom Line:
Sexy Babes TV is the "parent" site with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Eurobabez, also with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Dreambabes with 5 photosets per week and no video, and BabesUK with 1 photo set per week.
Then there is Babelicious with 5 photosets and 2 videos per week, and a great design and a very active users forum. (See separate reviews.)
Bringing up the rear are Babes on Film that has 1 clip from a porn vid posted each week, Cummin' At Ya! with 1 BJ video per week, BikiniBabe.TV with 1 photoset of babes in bikinis that never come off, and finally RoyalBoobs.com, an inactive site with about 10 big tit video clips.
Last note - Babelicious is the newest site of the bunch and has several characteristics that are similar to Twistys, but with Hi Def video clips now available on Babelicious, they win. (See the separate reviews for Babelicious for more details.)
While the main sites are very similar, the hottest babes (IMO) show up on SexyBabes.tv, Eurobabez.com and Babelicious.com that really make the membership price for sexybabes.com worth the money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Superb quality photos and videos
Some videos at 1720
All relatively fresh content
Photos are all zipped
Photos appear to be actively updated (last update was today, 3/30/08)
Normal speed download of both photo sets and videos (broadband)
All content is Shay Laren, most solo with a few lesbo shoots/vids
Subscription includes 6 other sites (see "bottom line" for details)
90 photo sets in three categories: Candid (8 sets), Girl/Girl(11 sets) and Solo (71 sets).
Easy navigation (site is too small to be complex)
Cons:
Light on content
No video updates since November, 2007 but new photos were added today (3/30/08)
UPDATE - 2 new videos added in early April, each about 11 minutes and each almost identical in content. Photos added on 4/5/08, none since.
Way overpriced as a standalone site, but partner sites make its price less terrible.
Personal blog has not been updated since last October.
The advertised Live Cam is non-existent.
Bottom Line:
$29.95 subscription gives access to: Glamour Models Gone Bad (huge content maintained daily) Amateurs Gone Bad (huge content maintained daily) Crissy Moran (static) (47 vids, lots of pix last u/d 2/08) Natalia Cruze (static) (2 vids, lots of pix last u/d 4/07) Lonnie Waters (static) (10 vids, lots of pix last u/d 1/08) Jesse Capelli (static) (25 vids, lots of pix last u/d 11/07)
Each of the sites in this list offer the other four for 24.95. The Shay Laren site is not available on any of them. That means if you like Glamour Models Gone Bad but want access to the Shay Laren site, you should sign up on the Shay Laren site first. It's $5.00 more but the content offering is worth the $5.00 if you are a shay Laren fan.
I have a normal speed cable modem and was able to "drain" all of the site's videos in about 5 hours. There are a total of 90 photo sets as of 3/30/08, and it looks like they are adding new sets quite frequently. There are a few more Shay Laren downloads available on Glamour Models Gone Bad.
BOTTOM LINE: If you like Shay but are not interested in any of the partners, $29.95 is way, way too much to pay for the currently paltry Shay Laren offerings. However, if the other sites are good for you long term, sign up for Shay's site for a month, drain it, then cancel and sign up next month for one of the partners.
The score of 84 is based on the small quantity of Shay Laren only. Considering the entire package, including the partner sites, it's a 90
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great talent.
Great concept, dealing with the babes as REAL PEOPLE and not porn whores.
Attractive site and interfaces.
Interesting thematics.
$2.95 [b]trial[/b] price is a good deal
Cons:
Very thin content.
Way overpriced for monthly membership (but great price for trial)
Slow, but not terribly so.
The interviews are fun, but most are done fully clothed from beginning to end. (Out of 43 total videos, 13 are interviews and 13 more are sloppily edited "behind the scenes," leaving a total of 17 videos that are full productions (but those 17 are very well done.)
One very cute babe, Franchezca Valentina, has no videos, just 118 photos. The other 13 have photo sets and at least 3 videos each.
Navigation is easy and well structured for a future fully populated site.
Bottom Line:
I signed up after reading Drooler's Comment. There are now 14 babes in the stable - SHAY LAREN was added on July 1 with 117 photos and 3 videos, the first update since mid-March.
I signed up today at 1:00pm. I completed a 100% drain of all content by 7:15pm, even with a lot of interruptions. I'm guessing that, with a normal broadbnand connection and no distractions, one could drain all of the content in two to three hour's time, tops.
The site has a lot of potential and really should have been loaded with a lot more content before going live, but for us Porn Users, it's a great deal at $2.95.
I'm hoping the webmaster works on building the site with much more content because I'll be back when it's ready for prime time.
(The 80 score is a direct result of the paucity of content. With 140 babes instead of 14, and if they are all of the same top drawer caliber, this site would warrant a mid 90's score.)
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge number of top quality photos and decent number of video clips.
- Great search engine that finds just about anything of interest - by name, body part, hair color, etc.
- Daily updates with 4 photo sets and 1 clip
- All recent videos are top quality
- Decent level of exclusive content but a lot of non-exclusive stuff as well
- TBP price ($19.95) is excellent compared to similar sites
- Zip photo downloads
- Has a rating system that is reasonably consistent with my tastes
Cons:
- Some older video clips are of lousy quality
- Video content is lighter than similar sites
- Older videos are in parts, requiring multiple downloads
- Many videos are X movie scenes and are not easily identified as such. Quality is a sometimes thing.
Bottom Line:
I'm more interested in video than in photos and this site is quite good in providing top notch quality in its daily updates. Many of the models are apparently exclusive to Twistys.
Bottom line, this site is definitely worth the investment for one month. I am a 10 month member at $99.00 and am quite satisfied with it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
My original review:
Pros: - Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM
Update: Some added "bonus content" since my last review.
Cons:
My original review:
Cons: - Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content. Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes.
-No zip for photos
Update:
No new vids since last review, no changes in review.
Bottom Line:
My original review:
Bottom Line: Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content.
Update:
Same except the current trial (go outside the TBP/PU link to VictoriaPink.com) is $1.00 for 7 days so if you have any interest in a nice looking babe with great natural tits and a nice meaty labia, skip the $1.00 burger tomorrow and spend it instead on this site...but be sure to cancel after signup so you can avoid a ridiculous $40.00 one month renewal.
51 score this time just because I love her tits and pussy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great body on the babe that is the focus of the site.
- Nice variety from non-nude to hard core.
- Very well organized and easy navigation.
- No DRM
Cons:
- Only one or two updates over the last 2+ years
- Vids are 352 or lower and are badly pixillated at full screen.
- Very small amount of content Appears to have become inactive
- Several of the older videos have disappeared including some really good ones.
- Advertises 37 video clips but there are really only 5 or 6 videos (now) and are downloadable in several 2 minute segments.
-Aspect ratio issues with some scenes.
Bottom Line:
Victoria appears on no other sites and is a great looking babe so for 10 bucks (TBP discounted rate) you can download everything in a few hours. But the site needs to be upgraded to a much better resolution and needs much, much more content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
