Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-You get access to 9 other sites.
-Content is dated.
-Videos can be downloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV.
-You can stream videos in low, medium or high quality flash.
-Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. (res: 2464 x 1643) over 100 pics per set |
Cons: |
-Site is tiny with only about 30 videos and photosets.
-They update about once a week but one week you get the photoset and the next week you get the video.
-The sites other than this one all use the same models but the name may be different from site to site and the action is often similar for each model so it can get repetitious. |
Bottom Line: |
-I've had my eye on Abigaile which is the name spunky bee is more commonly known under, since she first came onto the porn scene in 2009. She has worked for a couple of other sites but this is the only site that offers so much content.
-The only reason I joined this site is because it's the only one that offers so many sites under the tonybucks banner. This would be a poor stand alone site and frankly all of them would be in this category. There simply isn't enough content to justify such a high join price.
-My score is based on the fact that you get access to so many other sites but I found that the content on the other sites to be similar from one site to the next and they all use the same models in each of the other sites.
-Be advised that the content for most sites is your typical boyfriend/girlfriend type of sex with pussy penetration only. Very few models do anal so anal fans might want to avoid joining. |
|
03-20-11 09:43am
Replies (2)
|
Review
152
|
Freddie's World
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusive.
-Over 150 videos.
-Most of the models appear to be unknows rather than professionals so this adds an amateur feel to the videos.
-They update with one new video a week. |
Cons: |
-Many of the scenes lack decent lighting so the action is often hard to see properly.
-The scenes star almost exclusively Freddie so that can be a plus if you enjoy him and major negative if he annoys you.
-I found that the same performers are in too many videos.
-Navigation on the site is annoying because you can only move forward or backward by scolling one page at a time and no way to skip a page or pages. That's a pian when you want to see the updates on page 15 because you'll still have to scroll through the first 14. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is a simple site of a an older gentleman who has sex with a variety of women ranging in age from late teens to early 40's and films it for us to see. The camera angles aren't too bad and the action is pretty good. The only thing that hurts this site is that the lighting could be better but I guess you'd lose the amateur feel to some of the scenes.
The other big thing that hurts it is the fact that too many of the videos star the same 2 women
Angel and Tracy Lain. |
|
03-19-11 11:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
153
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have over 2000 videos to choose from.
-They have a good breakdown of the content in each video so that it makes it easy to find all the videos with that particular niche.
-Content is dated.
-They update with at least one new video a day.
-They have one of the largest selection of models to chose from.
-Most of the videos can be downloaded in low, medium and high quality. Since I only downloaded the medium ones then those appear for the most part to be 480x360.
**you get access to club seventeen(see con)** |
Cons: |
**You get access to club seventeen with your membership but since club seventeen is a pics only site and this is it's video equivalent then you arent really getting 2 sites for one membership.
-Many of their models are not under the name we know them so it requires a lot morte research to find content and identify it.
-A large part of their older content isn't very good.
-Difficult to tell how much of their content is available elsewhere but I did find a couple of their videos on videobox without looking too hard. |
Bottom Line: |
-I found a few videos that are worth keeping but the percentage of them versus the total amount available is quite tiny. I'm not disapointed that I joined but I don't think it's site that I'll ever join again.
-The site should satisfy those who enjoy a wide variety of sex scenes from solo, lesbian and hardcore starring the same model. I found that many of their models appear in more than one video doing different type of sex scene. |
|
03-07-11 07:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
154
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Most of their content appears to be exclusif.
-They have some of the only hardcore scenes from certain models.
-A very good selection of teen models.
-Videos can be downloasded in low, Med or high quality(all WMV).
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete zip file(resolution 1200x800).
Content is dated and they appear to update every 5 days.
-They have a little over 500 videos and more than 600 photosets in their library. |
Cons: |
-Download speeds are pretty poor. I could use a download manager but I could only download one file at a time and surfing the site would kill my download speed.
-Some of their content is leased.
-Some of the male performers in the videos seem to be the models boyfriend so it adds a certain amateur style to the videos but this can be distracting since they aren`t pros. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is a decent site with some good content & cute teens doing a mixture softcore, midcore and hardcore shoots but the download speeds make it hard to recommend. This might be a temporary situation because I don`t remember having that problem the first week I joined the site.
My score is based in large part to the speed issue and not so much the content. This is a good site if you like to see Eastern European teens having sex. |
|
02-20-11 09:40am
Replies (5)
|
Review
155
|
Pack Of Porn
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Some exclusif and non-exclusif content.
-A wide variety of models to choose from.
-A huge library of content(over 1200 videos).
-Some of the sites are still updating with new content.
-They use the correct name for most performers.
-They have a good search interface system that allows memebers to find content under a specific site, models name or sex act/fetsih.
-The dialogue is almost always in English.
-Photos can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format.
-You can use a download manager. |
Cons: |
-The quality of the older vids is not very good.
-Difficult to tell what is leased and non-leased so it's difficult to say what is exclusif to the network.
-Some of the videos can only be downloaded in multiple clips.
-Some of the same models perform similar sex acts on more than one site.
-Most of the sites are no longer updating. |
Bottom Line: |
-There are quite a lot of good videos to choose from but only old farts young tarts and spunky teens seem to still be updating with exclusif new content. The other sites which are updating but I'd bewilling to bet that this is all leased content is Lesbian Kingdom, UK road trip and jerk and slurp.
-This is a good network to try if you enjoy the old/Young fetish because this is the most common thread through many of the sites beside their main old fart young tarts. |
|
02-06-11 07:07pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
156
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
72.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusive content.
-Some really good looking girls.
-Videos can be downloaded as a single file.
-Photos can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Interface allows to search by models name or by fetishes. |
Cons: |
-There's a pretty big, colorful watermark on each of their videos and sometimes it's on the top right of the screen.
-A kind of regional pricing.
-Only 23 models to choose from.
-No video download options.
-A pretty small site with only 76 videos.
-26 of the videos are solo girls playing with their strap-on.
-Content is not dated so no way of judging if or when they update with new content. |
Bottom Line: |
-I was rather surprised when the advertised 30$ join price became 35$ and maybe that should have been a warning that I might regret my membership and I did.
-I really think there's a market for this type of content and I was hoping that this site might be a good one but I only found 6 videos worth downloading and most will get deleted to make space for better content.
-If you have 30$ burning a hole in your pocket and like to see girls playing with strap-ons then you might enjoy this site. |
|
01-24-11 07:05pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
157
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Huge network of 21 sites.
-There is no update schedule but it appears that they add at least 2 new scenes per day.
-An amazing selection of Eastern European teen stars to choose from.
-They have an excellent navigation system with good search options and a major bonus is that many of their models have one of the name they are often known by.
-Videos can be streamed online.
-Most videos can be downloaded in low, medium or high quality.
-You can use a download manager.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format(resolution 960x1440)
-They have added 2 new sites to the network.
-The 19.95$ join price is mre than a bargain. |
Cons: |
-They have a large network but only 5 of the sites are still updating.
-The same model may appear on more than one site but she often performs similar sex acts with the same male performer.
-Some of their content is leased material.
-A lot of their older content is not very good by todays standard and some could be dropped to make more space on their server for the newer content. |
Bottom Line: |
-They've added 2 new sites to their network and, although one is exclusive and the other is all leased material; both are actually a major plus for this network. They have also redesigned their network where it's easier to see the different updates and do searches.
*Tricky Masseur has potential because there aren't that many sites that offer this type of shoot.
*Beauty angel is basically the same content that can be found on smackmybitch and 18xgirls but which you now get with this network.
-If you like to see super cute teen girls have varying degree of hardcore sex then you will get more than your money's worth. |
|
01-17-11 11:09am
Replies (4)
|
Review
158
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-All exclusive material.
-They update with 2-3 new videos each month.
-A very good selection of Eastern Europeans teen girls.(most are well know porn performers)
-There is a little scenario with a much older teacher coercing the teen into having sex with him.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format (1200x800). |
Cons: |
-There is only one video download option (WMV) and no choice in the possible resolution.
-The dialogue is all in Russian and that's too bad because it would add a major element to the scenes.
-They could use a little more foreplay with some added kissing between the players.
-It would be nice if they gave the players the correct name and even more so if they gave her the same one for all of their sites.
-They have a search by model option but because of the above issue with names then I wonder why they offer it. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is probably the one site in this network that has the potential to be much better and I don't think they need to make too many changes for that to happen.
They could offer some English dialogue or at the very least subtitles so that we can get into the little scenarios. As it is you can only guess at what is said(unless you speak Russian) and please make sure that the same model doesn't have a different names from site to site.
-If you like the older/younger fetish and can overlook the Russian dialogue then you should enjoy this site. |
|
01-17-11 09:52am
Replies (6)
|
Review
159
|
She Made Us Lesbians
(0)
69.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Exclusive material.
-They have some really cute teens that most will know if you are familiar with Eastern European performers.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format. The resolution is 800x1200.
-Access to a network of 29 sites. |
Cons: |
-This is a tiny site with only 22 videos.
-They only update once a month.
-There is only one video option(wmv).
-You can stream the videos in Flash or WMV but they are cut-up in sections so no way of seeing the entire video.
-There is a little scenario with dialogue but it's in Russian so no way of knowing what they say..Unless you understand Russian(I don't).
-The videos are similar with 2 teens and 1 older lady but most of the interaction is between the teens.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are more commonly known under. |
Bottom Line: |
-This site could never survive as a stand alone because it doesn't update often enough and their lack of choice in the possible download videos formats doesn't help.
-It's not a terrible bonus site but I can't help to feel that they missed the boat on the premise for their videos. If you are going to have two teens with an older woman than you'd think that she should be a more active player rather than be regalated to sideline coach.
-I don't recommend you join this site unless the content on the other sites appeals to you. |
|
01-17-11 09:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Access to 28 other sites with one membership.
-They have a nice selection of European teen models to choose from.
-Navigation from site to site is made easy by including a link of each site on the main pages of each site.
-They update with one new scene a week.
-Photos can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in one zip file. The pci resolution is 800x1200.
-Videos can be streamed in WMV and Flash.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV but with only one video quality of 832x468. |
Cons: |
-This is still a very small site.(43 videos)
-Many of the models can be found on other sites performing similar sexual acts.
-Although you get access to a large network of sites. Most aren't updating anymore.
-They offer only one video download option and no choice in the quality of the vids.
-Many of the models are given names that aren't the ones we might know them by.
-Some of their content is leased material. |
Bottom Line: |
-I found that a lot of the content on this site and a couple of the others within the network is very similar to what can be found elsewhere and for less than the cost of their membership. They still offer a couple of unusual sites to make the visit worth it.
-You should only join if you want access to the other sites within the network because there is not enough content here to justify the cost of a 30$ membership.
-Be advised that only 6 other sites are still updating with new content. She made us lesbians, tricky old teacher, amour babes, horny thief tales, 18 virgin sex, and spoiled virgins. |
|
01-09-11 11:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Over 500 videos and pic sets to choose from.
-Most videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and Quicktime. They offer standard resolution at 720x405 and HD at 1280x720
-You can stream videos in Flash.
-Pics sets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set.
-There is a wide selection of models to choose from.
-They have some nice fetishes to choose from like watersports, spanking, latex, bondage to name a few.
-A good selection of models. Most of them being Eastern Europeans porn performers |
Cons: |
-They don't update very often and it's difficult to tell what is and isn't new content since they don't date any of it.(except on the preview page)
-Some of their scenes are split in 2 or more sections and these aren't updated at the same time but over a certain number of weeks.
-Some of the updates are older scenes that have been given a facelift and now come in better video resolution.
-They update with some leased content.
-Some of the content appears to be from some of their other sites. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is another site under the ddf network and one that lives more on it's connection to that network rather than it's own merit. It would not have gotten as high a score if it weren't for the automatic access to the network.
-This one suffers from some of the same issues that plague Handsonhardcore. They don't update regularly. Their updates aren't necessarily new scenes as much as re-issued older ones. They now have leased content and also use content from some of their other sites. Add the fact that they don't date their material and this makes it hard to know what is and isn't new material.
-I guess this site still has some good stuff to offer but mostly for new porn surfer. Older memebers will probably feel more cheated than satisfied. |
|
01-07-11 07:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
162
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Almost 700 videos & pics sets availablew for download.
-A good selection of performers that cover most body types.
-Most videos can be downloaded in quicktime, WMV,
Flash and MP4(HD is available in a couple of format as well).
-They upgraded the quality of many of their older videos(see cons).
-Access to the dff network with one membership. |
Cons: |
-Site no longers update regularly.
-Many of the updates are older scenes that had an upgrade in video quality or offer more video formats.
-Some of the updates is leased content.
-Some of the updates is content taken from their other sites.
- |
Bottom Line: |
Part of my score is based on the fact that this site doesn't really update with a significant amount of new content as much as re-release older scenes in better video quality or offer different video formats. I appreciate the work that goes into taking older videos and cleaning and reformating them but these should not be the bulk of new updaates. I believe a site survives on new content and not on 5yrs old scenes.
Another annoying thing is their use of content from their other sites passed of as new and the addition of some leased material.
The only thing that saves them from getting a worse score is the fact that I think many people starting to surf for porn can still find many excellent scenes on this site but most returning members should be weary of downloading content they already have at least once. |
|
01-06-11 07:48pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
163
|
Porn Traveling
(0)
69.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-You get to see different travel locations like Egypt, Turkey and Thailand.
-The girls are very cute and most are newbies to porn.
-These appear to all be real life porn couples on vacation.
-Videos can be downloaded in iphone 460x320, AVI 1024x576 and HD 1280x720 format.
-Videos can streamed in Flash.
Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file. |
Cons: |
-This is basically a variation of cashforsextape but here our real life couples are on vacation so why create a new site when these could have been added to the other site.
-Still a very small site with 3 travel locations.
-Ligthing is again not very good.
-Dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitles.
-Content is not dated so impossible to know when they are updating or if theyr still do.
-Many hours of videos to download but a lot of it is not about sex as much as couples playing and talking. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is basically cashforsextape on vacation. Many of the couples on that site are on this one but this time they are in an exotic locations. The major improvement is that most of the sex is filmed by a third party so less POV shots and we can see some of the action.
-This one suffers many of the same problems that cashforsextape did. The only exception is the third party camera shots.
-If you are curious to see how porn couples interact with each other and friends on vacation then you might enjoy this site but be warned that you'll have to watch a lot of content that has nothing to do about sex. |
|
01-01-11 09:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
65.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-This truly appear to be real life porn couples that film some of their everyday stuff but where sex is still the main theme.
-All videos can streamed in Flash.
-videos can be downloaded in AVI format with standard resolution.
-Each couple has multiple videos that are shot over an undetermined period of time so you have many hours of content for each couple.
-There are 46 couples to choose from and each has many hours of video content. |
Cons: |
-These are sex tapes of porn couples so like all other sex tapes. The videos are shot either in POV or from a tripod which means you get jerky camara shots or long shots with bad angles where you see little of the action.
-Ligthing is often bad to awful.
-There are many hours of avalaible content to download but a good chunk of it is not about them having sex since it includes some of their everyday stuff.
-Since these are porn couples then the guys are the girls real boyfriend and aren't necessarily porn performers and many of them wouldn't win any beaty conntest.
-Dialogue is all in Russian with subtitles. |
Bottom Line: |
-There has to be a market for this kind of content because they are still updating but I honestly don't know who likes this stuff. I'm not a huge fan of POV and let alone tripod shot porn. Pierre Woodmand is one of the few that has been able to do a prety decent job of it but he's a pro who's been doing it for years. these people aren't.
-If you are curious to see who a porn girl wants to date and what their normal life is like then you might enjoy this site but be prepared for badly shot porn intermixed with a lot of non-porn related content. |
|
01-01-11 09:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
06-18-11 09:27am (Update History)
Reason: I rejoined the site and I find that their updates have slowed.
|
Pros: |
-Acces to 5 other sites with one membership.
-All the girls are popular newbies in the porn world.
-All videos come in 3 formats: iphone 480x320,
standard AVI 1024x576, and HD MKV 1280x720.
-You can stream the videos in Flash.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Content is dated.
-You can use a download manager but are limited to only 2 and sometimes 3 downloads at a time. |
Cons: |
-This is a very small site with only 24 videos.
-They now appear to only update with one new video every month.
-Some of the content on the other site might have limited appeal.
-Many performers have the same first name only. The people behind this site have simply added a number to their first name ie: Lena 8, Lera 5 and so forth.
-You can only download about 2 videos at a time and you cannot surf within the site or network until one of the downloads is complete. |
Bottom Line: |
-This was a small site within a network of 5 other sites in January and at the time I gave it an 85 for potential but the network has not gotten better but worse. Most of the other sites except for pickupgilrs almost never update.
The theme of the videos are mini gangbangs with one girl and 3 guys. Anal in all of them with most getting a dp.
-The first 8 videos were all shot outside and that is consistent with content shot in the summer or early fall while the most recents are all inside and that makes sense as it is winter overthere.
-The 35$ join price may be a little too high for what you will get.
-It's hard to say if this is now a network worth joining because of the update schedule. In January I would have said yes but now it's not so clear. You should only join for what you will find on this site and the others within the network and not for what might be coming up in future updates. |
|
01-01-11 08:09am
Replies (2)
|
Review
166
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments. |
Cons: |
-Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number, |
Bottom Line: |
-I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.
-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.
-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.
-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them. |
|
12-31-10 10:50am
Replies (4)
|
Review
167
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They currently have 100 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Access to 5 other sites with one membership.
-Most videos come in at least standard 1024x576 AVI and a large part also include HD 1280x720.
-Videos can be streamed in Flash.
-Many photosets can be viewed online and they can all be downloaded as a single zip file.
-You can vote on your favorite girl or video and post comments. |
Cons: |
-The same model can appear on more than one site where she performs similar sex acts.
-Download speeds aren't bad but you can usually download a maximum of 4 videos at the same time and sometimes only 2. You cannot surf any of the sites once you havw reached your maximum number of downloads because their server will give you an error message.
-Many of the models are given a name different then what we know them under.
-The dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitle.(that might annoy some).
-As the title implies. This is a site where we are meant to believe that these everyday girls are picked up by these guys and inticed into having sex on camera.(it doesn't really work). |
Bottom Line: |
-This is a pretty good site as long as you don't care about the little scenarios and the dialogue that's in Russian. The scenarios didn't work for me because I recognized the performers and they are all pornstars.
The download speeds and the fact that you can only download a maximum of 4 videos and often only 2 videos is a little annoying. This is compounded by the fact that surfing the site and network is impossible during those periods.
-Membership gives you access to 5 other sites.
The only site that might include lease content is chickiporn and that's why I won't review it.
studentsexparties.com
cashforsextape.com
hardfucktales.com
porntraveling.com
chickiporn.com |
|
12-31-10 08:32am
Replies (6)
|
Review
168
|
Everything Butt
(0)
96.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Their choice of models is very impressive and they have a better selection than in the past.
-All the performers appear to truly enjoy anal sex and this often involves large toys and fisting.
-They have added B/G content(it was mostly solo and G/G in the past).
-They currently have 115 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV & MP4 and both come in regular or Hi-Def.
-You can use a download manager.
-Membership to one site gives you deals for the other sites withink the kink network. |
Cons: |
-This is still their biggest drawback and I don't expect it to change but their photosets aren't worth watching and let alone downloading.
-I'd love to see 2 updates per week but I can live with just one because of the quality.
-They have added many new models to the site and that's a welcomed change but you still find the same model doing multiple shoots or similar stauff that she might have done on other Kink sites. |
Bottom Line: |
-This is my favorite Kink site and the one that I make sure to visit every week to see the most recent update. Due to the cost of a membership. I usually only stay for 2 months. They offera special deal where you get 2 months for a small increase in the cost of a one month membership.
-Their selection of models is getting better each time I visit and you now have many newbies that you wouldn't necessarily expect to see on this type of site. Add the fact that they've added B/G content and people that avoided it in past because of the G/G only stuff shgould be very happy.
If you like to see girls that look like they love anal sex with a Kink twist then this is a great site. Please avoid if you prefer your vanilla style of anal sex. You won't find it here. |
|
12-27-10 07:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
Torbe Network
(0)
74.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-About 800 videos.
-Some exclusive content.
-You can download most videos in 4 format which include Quicktime, ipod/psp, wmv and mpg4.
-You can use a download manager.
-You can download some of the picture sets as a complte file.
-The videos are all dated.
-There is an option to search using the models name. |
Cons: |
-Large part of the content appears to be leased and the quality is from good to poor.
-The camera work in many of the videos is not very good and the cameraman tends to zoom on the penetration for too long.
-Certain scenes have only video and no pic sets while others have only pics and no video.
-The language used in many of the videos is not English.
-Many of the videos have a strong amateurish feel to them.
-Most of the leased content little to no model info.
-Synopsis of the action in the videos is often incorrect. |
Bottom Line: |
I haven't been lucky with my memberhsip of late beause this is another network that has really disapointed me. I thought that I could find some goo videos but out of about 800 or so videos. I have downloaded about 12 and all will be deleted from my computer. There are still quite a few videos that llok good but they don't appeal to me.
This network might appeal more to someone who's just starting to surf for porn and likes the amateur/newbie style of porn. I'd avise most older porn surfer to avoid because of the leased content. You don't want to join this site only to find out you have many of the videos. |
|
12-20-10 07:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
170
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-They have a nice mix of female body types.
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.
-Nearly 150 videos.
-Videos appear to all be wmv.
-You can use a download manager. |
Cons: |
-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face. |
Bottom Line: |
The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action. After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action. Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site. |
|
12-11-10 07:09pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
171
|
Ferro Network
(0)
62.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-CCbill is their CC processor.
-They have a wide variety of sites that target specific fetishes like: anal, mature, shemales, feet, nylon & pantyhose, gays, lesbian and toys.
-They have a pretty impressive library of videos.
I stopped counting at 2000 videos because the content on the other sites did not appeal.
-Some sites offer both videos and photo sets.
-Many of the videos come in a single file but not all of them.(see Cons)
-You can download photosets as a single zip file.
-You can use a download manager(see Cons).
-They rebill at almost half the original cost.
-Some of the videos have little scenarios but it's all in Russian. |
Cons: |
-You have to log in to each site individualy from the main members site everytime you visit that main site. The only redeeming thing is that as long as you go back to the main ferro page and you've log on to a specific site once then you won't have to log in again.
-Once you've logged on to a site then there is no way of going back to the main ferro page except if you use the back button as many times as you did going forward or logging back on to the main screen.
-You can use a download manager but since you can only download about 4 videos at a time then why bother.(I didn't see a difference in speeds either way).
-There is no search option of any kind.
-The updates are not dated so no way of knowing if or when the sites update.
-There is only one video download option.
-Some videos are broken in 3 or more sections.
-The price is way too high for what this network offers. |
Bottom Line: |
-I've been curious about ferro since the moment I heard about the network. The cost always made it a near impossible option for me but since I recently won the top draw then I thought this would be the time.(No you can't use your winning for that but I could buy Christmas gifts with them and that left me some extra cash).
-This network might have been a great find about 8 to 10 yrs ago. All that porn under one roof and such an amazing selection to chose from but this is 2010 and a network that doesn't date their updates, offer better download options, lowering their exorbitant join cost should not exist.
Possibly the best thing about the join price is that it makes it very hard for most porn surfers to join and seeing the content makes me think that's not a bad idea. If they drop their price then more people will be tempted to join this site and franky that would be a bad idea for most customers.
I debated which score to give this network and I stuck with 62 only because there are still quite a few good videos. You'll just have to do some serious research to find. |
|
12-05-10 09:04am
Replies (4)
|
Review
172
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Over 120 videos
-They update once a week.
-A mixture of European and American performers.
-They film in different locations than those normally used for other Kink shoots and some of these are outside locations.
-The models are not all well known performers.
-Videos can be downloaded in either WMV or mp4 and version comes in normal & HD quality.
You can use a download manager. |
Cons: |
-Photosets are broken in 4 sections and although
you can download each section whole. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.
-Each shoot as bystanders that aren't part of the action and I found that more distracting than anything else.
-The camera angles aren't always the greatest and that deducts from the enjoyment.
-I didn't enjoy a single one of the videos that are shot outside. |
Bottom Line: |
This is the second kink site that does little for me. Ultimnate Surrender is the other one. This one is more centered on sex but most of the shoot left me unsatisified. I think the main thing that bothers me is the addition of an audience for each shoot. The camera will from time to time pan toward the audience and then back to the girl and frankly that does nothing for me.
This site should appeal to people that like to watch porn with an audience but for the others I'd recommend a site like sex and submission. |
|
11-28-10 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Whipped Ass
(0)
96.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Over 540 videos.
-They update with one new scene each week.
-Very good selection of models.
-Very good chemistry between doms and subs.
-Videos can be downloaded in either wmv or mp4 and each version comes in standard & HD quality.
-You can use a download manager.
-Navigation between each Kink site does not require you to log in each time.
-Membership to one site gives you deals on the access to the other Kink sites.
-Less pain inducing BSDM. |
Cons: |
-The photosets are broken down into four section
and although can can download each section in one zip file. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.
-Their older content did not age well and I find that it contained a little too much pain and not enough sex. |
Bottom Line: |
I did this review in large part because of the last review that was done. I'm not sure what daniel saw that made him give this site such a low score but it can't have been what I saw.
I find that over the years the site has moved away from the intense pain giving BSDM porn to intense pleasure giving. The BSDM is still there but I find that it's more subdued. For me that is a plus because that was the one thing that always bothered me about the older content.
I took a look at the 30 most recent updates and Half the girls are newbies to this site and a large part of them are newbies to Kink. As well many of these are up and coming girls in the biz.
This site is for people that like lesbian porn with a BSDM twist and anal sex. |
|
11-28-10 10:57am
Replies (4)
|
Review
174
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-The concept is orginal and that's pretty rare in porn.
-They have many of the regular Kink performers.
-You can use a download manager.
-Videos come in WMV or MP4 and both offer regular quality or HD.
-They update with one new video every 3-4 days.
-They have over 420 videos. |
Cons: |
-I found the rules for the wrestling somewhat hard to figure out.
-They will pan to the audience and that tends to distract from the action.
-I found that most of the sex was too cold and lack any kind of passion and heat.
-The setting is always on the mat and in the same room.
-Lighting is a little on the dark side of things. |
Bottom Line: |
-I'm not sure if Kink wanted to make a wrestling site with added to it or make a sex site that had wrestling in it. No matter what they wanted to achieve I certainly didn't really enjoy it.
It could be that they were thinking that after watching a couple of girls fight each other for a while that we'd be thrilled to see the winner really give it to the loser but if that's the case then it didn't work for me. I downloaded a couple of videos but I can't say that more then 2-3 are worth watching more than once.
The site is still updating so I assume that I'm not the customer they cater to. |
|
11-22-10 07:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Oldje
(0)
77.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
11-22-10 01:50pm (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
|
Pros: |
-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes. |
Cons: |
-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with. |
Bottom Line: |
-This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.
I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some. |
|
11-22-10 08:51am
Replies (9)
|