| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-08-10 06:47pm (Update History)
Reason: did not include which sites came with membership
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 20 other sites.
-all models are super cute teens.
-They have some of the first hardcore scene from girls just starting in porn.
-They now update with one new video a week and they currently have 53 videos.
-You can download videos in low, medium and high.
-Medium quality is 860x480.
-You can stream videos in Flash.
-Navigating from site to site is one click away.
-You can download photosets in zip format and the pics are 960x1440.
-Over 1300 videos available through all the sites.
-You can use a dowanload manager. |
| Cons: |
-Many of the sites are no longer updating.
-I believe that some of the content is leased.
-Quality in the older videos is not always the best.
-Some of the same models appear on more than one site.
-The name of the models is not necessarily the one you know them under.(they aren't as bas as others).
-Their search functions are not very good and I'd almost say not worth bothering with.
-Scene description don't always match content |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is for people that enjoy watching cute teens having hardcore sex and getting sodomized.
I'd say that anal is common in many of the other sites as well but there is still a large amount of standard b/g and g/g only videos.
I gave this site a much higher score based on the other sites since this site is still too small to justify a +90 score with only 53 video.
I would have given them a score of about 85 but if they keep updating regularly and also keep the qualtiy then it will definetely earn that +90 score all by itself.
I forgot to add which sites are included with my membership and their updates. lolly hardcore(still updating), teen stars only(last update March 2010), home teen vids(last update March 2010), teen sex mania(still updating), at movs(last update June 2010),
home toy tens(last update in September 09), private teen videos(last update December 09), solo teen girls(last update April 2010), gag n gape(last update November 09), old n young (last update April 09), teens 3 some(last update February 09), nubile girls HD(new stuff as of October 2010 but can't confirm beyond that),teen sex movs(still updating). |
|
11-07-10 06:26pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
177
|
Gapeland
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Automatic access to 29 other sites.
-Some of the sites offered with this membership aren't available through some of the other sites.
-They update with one new scene a week.
-They have some models not on any of the other 21 sextury sites.
-Dowload managers are accepted.
-Videos come in both h.264 and wmv and from low quality to ultra high quality.
-Going from site to site is just a click away.
- |
| Cons: |
-The biggest drawback is that there are only 15 videos currently available so you should join only to get access to the other sites for now.
-Some of the girls appearing on this site have anal videos on the network so you aren't going to get a new girl so much as a new perspective.
-Some of the sites offered are dead sites since the content hasn't been updated in years.
-Unless there is a chnage then this package will never give you access to Club Sandy or Pix and Video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was planing to rejoin 21sextury and I knew that this was one of their newest sites so I took a chance and I'm not disapointed with what I got. Not necessarily for this site as much because 15 videos is not a very big library but because of what you get with the package. I think it will still take me the same amount of months to get full access to all the sites but I will have access to 45 sites. That's 5 more sites then what I used to get with my pix and video membership.
My score is mostly based on the complete network package. |
|
11-01-10 07:45pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
178
|
MMM100.net
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-A very thorough and easy navigation system that allow users to find almost anything on the site.
-Their choice of performers seems more geared toward promoting amateurs and up & comers rather than established stars.
-They like to film their videos in a wide variety of locations from beautiful beaches to your basic porn bedroom.
-Many the perfomers have a progression of scenes from basic nudes to the more hardcore stuff.
-updates come at least every 2 days.
-Videos can be downloaded as a single file in wmv
with an avergage resolution of 640x360 but their newer videos now come in HD as well. |
| Cons: |
I put some asteriks on some of the cons because, although they weren't a problem for me, they might be to some people.
**As far as I can tell, all the scenes involve the use of condoms.
**Navigation may be possible in a couple of languages but the content is mostly all French and Spanish with no English subtitles.
**Most of the performers are French and Spanish which explains the above spoken language con.
-Male performers are not necessarily established stars which can be a turn off.
-Although many of the girls/women appearing on this site also appear on explcite. On this site they have chosen to go for an amateurish look rather than a glamourous one.
-There is a good percentage of the girls that sport some obvious tattoos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm French Canadian so the fact that most of the dialogue is in French was not a turn off for me but the opposite. That could be a problem for some but then again most Eastern European sites have either no dialogue, basic English or some Russian.
This site may appeal more to people that prefer their models to be more natural looking with very little artificial embellishements and don't mind condoms in their sex scenes. That last one is very important because I know that it's a big sticking point for some.
**Their credit card processor is cgbilling.com and I had never heard of them before this but I have no complain. |
|
10-08-10 08:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
179
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Their extensive library of videos(over 5500).
-They update almost daily.
-They have one of the best selection of newbies.
-Navigation is easy to use and allows search using a wide variety of options like hair color, nationality, fetish, age group and so forth.
-Download speeds are 500kB/sec or better.
-Can download multiple videos at the same time.
I was able to download more than 6 and that's without using a download manager.
-You can use a download manager.
-Photosets can be downloaded in zip format.
-The join price of 17.95$ is hard to beat. |
| Cons: |
-The fake cum. Why do they even bother to use that stuff? It might not be so bad if they didn't use it in industrial quantities but when you pretend to shoot a load that's half a gallon then who exactly are you trying to appeal to? It can't be fans of facials because I suspect those people prefer the real stuff than what looks like a mixture of water and icing sugar.
-Some of the fetishes are slightly misleading. Although they might mention anal in the scene. That can easily mean light anal play as oppose actual anal penetration.
-There is one site that has an idiot talking during the scene and that's always annoying.
-One of the site uses Ron Jeremy and I can't say that seeing is fat belly was very appealing.
-Prechecked cross sell.
-They have crappy preview pages. They could do far better and might help with traffic and actual membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
I read a couple of comments before joining the site about their business practices. I can't speak for the past but I had nor problem joining and leaving was just as easy.
There is a lot to enjoy about this network but I guess the biggest thing is the sheer amount of new girls just starting in porn and doing their very first scenes.
The one thing that really isn't enjoyable at all and I've already mentioned it is the FAKE CUM. I won't get further into the details but I will never give this network a score of 90 and above simply because of that. If it was used in small quantity then I suspect we couldn't really tell and that might be fine but not the way they currently use it.
I wish they would have a larger amount of anal. That is one of my favorite fetishes and I find that it's quite lacking on the network.
Some of the sites aren't updating anymore and some only do sporadic updates but I didn't have a problem with that because I found that other sites were doing similar content.
I think that if you like cute teens getting F..d and don't mind too much the fake cum then you will be happy with the network. The network should be avoided by anyone that hates the fake cum because you WILL be very disatisfied. |
|
08-15-10 10:35am
Replies (16)
|
Review
180
|
Society SM
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 4 other sites with one membership.
-Nearly 250 models to chose from a surprisignly
varied choice of models which a large portion of them are well known pornstars.
-site offers at least 4 new scenes per month.
-Over 350 scenes to choose from.
-Navigation from one site to the next is only a click away. |
| Cons: |
-scenes are broken down in sections so no way to download a complete video.
-There is no separate section for pics & videos so you have to check every page to find the ones that contain the video and the ones with pics.
-Most of the content involves one man trying to make the girl cum often using only his hands or a vibrator. That can get repetitious quite fast. |
| Bottom Line: |
I must confess that I didn't really want to join this site/network but somehow I thought that joining this site would give me access to the one that I really wanted and the main reason why I didn't want to join is because of the amazing review rear admiral did. He hit on all the key points.
I suspect that our score differ in large part because I don't think a site that offers videos only in sections deserves a score of 90 and above
If a sites chooses to offer videos then they should at the very least be downloadable as complete scenes.
I found that the camera angles in the videos was often focusing in the wrong place and I would have wanted more intereaction with the performer and more girl on girl BSDM. |
|
08-07-10 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
181
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They update with a new scene once a week.
-Membership includes access to 7 other sites.
-Interesting mix of amateur/newcomers and well established performers.
-Movies can be streamed in flash.
-You can download the movies in various fomats which include wmv, quicktime, ipod/iphone & mpg.
-They offer hi-def in 1280x720, 1440x1080 or 192x1080 for movies made from 2007 and after.
-You can download about 4 scenes at a time without a download manager(avg time is 15min).
-You can download the pic sets in zip format. |
| Cons: |
-The senes have a fairly strong mysoginistic feel to them. You don't get a sense that they are trying to film a girl that enjoys this kind of sex as much as survives it. I guess it makes sense to call the site facial abuse but they could have called it pornstar abuse and it would have been just, if not more appropriate.
-If there is one site that feels like a graduate of the Max Hardcore school of pornography then this is the one. If you've seen what passes for porn in any of the movies Max made in the last few years then you will know what you'll get with this site.
-The pics are stills from the movies.
-Except for nasty little facials. All the other sites are either no longer updating or it appears to be leased content. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still wondering why I join this site again.
I didn't particularly enjoy it the first time and I think it's gotten worse or at least worse for me. I think the latest offer of 19.95$ and the fact that they had a couple of cuties may have blinded me to the awful fact that I really disliked Max style of choking, drooling, vomiting BJ and most of their updates now contain some if not all of these things.
These guys could easily take Max's place and except for the fact that Max would not be in the scene. No one would tell the difference. So if you saw any of the movies that Max made in the last few years and really liked that style then you will be thrilled by this site.
Anyone who did not enjoy Max's stuff should stay very far away or you will regret it.
I'm actually suprised by the number of fairly well known performers they've been able to get seeing as this is not the stuff you'd expect to see them do.
I debated what score I should give them because although I did not enjoy most of the content. The site is technically pretty well done and is sure to satisfy people that enjoy this type of porn. Not to mention that I found a couple of scenes in the other sites that had the same performer as facial abuse but the scene was more what I enjoy. |
|
07-24-10 11:57am
Replies (16)
|
Review
182
|
Huge Strapon Lesbians
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They currently have 76 scenes(all dated).
-They update with one new scene per week.
-Access to 6 other sites.
-Movies can be downloaded in parts or whole.
-Videos com in 640 & 1920 WMV as well as 640 MP4.
-You can use a download manager.
-The performers are all identified with their proper name.
-The toys used do match the name of the site.
-Photosets can be downloaded in zip format. |
| Cons: |
-The only way to search for a scene is by it's date, the type sex (vag/anal) and it's score.
-Although you get 6 other sites. Only 3 of those may still be updating with new content.
-The photosets have a resolution of 1200 x 800 but they appear more like teaser material than an actual desire to satisfy their customer.
-The price is pretty steap for what you get.
-Older content on the other sites is of poor quality and looks very dated. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site belongs to the same people that own norestfortheass or they use the same director locations and performers. I was a recent member of N.R.F.T.A so the similarities in content, performers and styly is obvious. I can't prove it but I think they saw an opportunity to make more money by stopping to update content on one or more of their network and creating this new site with that content. I would have prefered paying a couple of dollars more and getting this content with my norestfortheass membership.
I think that only brutal dildos and maybe Sasha Rose are still updating but the prior is again content that could and should have been added to the N.R.F.T.A network and not this one.
If you like Girl/Girl action with huge toys that penetrate vaginas and anus than you will be satified.
To be avoided with anyone looking for serious passion between the performers. Some were able to portray it but most missed theboat. |
|
06-25-10 08:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
183
|
Jim Slip
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 500 scenes(all of them dated).
-The site updates with about 4 scenes per month.
-A good navigation system that allows searches like hair color, body type, fetish and more.
-Jim employs models that come in a wide variety of body types and age groups.
-Models names are those we know them by.
-Videos starting in mid 2009 can be downloaded as complete scenes as well as clips. |
| Cons: |
-All the videos are still broken down in clips ranging from 5 to 15 or more.
-Download speed is pretty slow. I couldn't download more than 7 clips at a time.
-Only the most recent videos can be streamed.
-Video quality is average(you can forget HD).
-There is only one male star(Jim) so you have to like him or you'll waste your money.
-I didn't see where you can download the photos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is not a bad site but it lost points the moment that I realised it was still offering all the videos in small clip format. It's true that a portion can now be downloaded as a whole scene but the older videos should also be remastered as whole scenes.
-If you can overlook the fact that the videos are still small clips and you like an older man that has sex sex with young girls than this site might appeal to you. Jim hires a good selection of English and Eastern Europeans models for his shoots. You will recognize many of them since they use their own name, at least the one I know them under. |
|
06-09-10 07:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a good selection of popular European
performers.
-Access to 7 other sites.
-They are still updating on most sites.
-Their content is all dated.
-Scenes can streamed in Flash.
-downloaded scenes come in low or high WMV/MPEG.
-Photosets can be downloaed in zip file.
-No DRM on videos. |
| Cons: |
-Many of the scenes are badly filmed which gives the content a certain amateurish feel to it.
-Although they employ many well established stars. They've given most of them a different name than what they are known under.
-A few of the sites have leased content and some aren't updating anyomore.
-Too expensive for what is offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was curious about this site. I knew that they had quite a few scenes with some of my favorite stars and the content looked good. Add the fact that you could get access to a couple of other sites and I took the plunge.
I won't say that I feel cheated but the content is very disapointing. It's hard to believe that they can hire super cute European stars and make them look drab and unatractive. The porn is too fast and you don't get any chemistry between the players. |
|
05-22-10 10:53am
Replies (5)
|
Review
185
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gigantic library of videos.
-Good Interaction from Pierre in the forum.
-Some Exclusive material.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in WMV and H.264.
-The sites updates regularly. |
| Cons: |
-Downloads speeds aren't very fast. A 20 minute video may take from 20 to 45 minutes to download.
-You usually can only download 4 videos at the same time.
-The quality of the videos is hit and miss. The older content has not been remastered and it shows.
-THere is a very large watermark at the bottom of each video.
-Many of the videos are only interviews.
-A cost of 30 Euros makes it harder to justify for North Americans. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've seen many of Pierre's movies. I enjoy his style and he often gets girls to do stuff on camera that they have never done and may never do again. The majority of the content on this site is taken from interviews that he's done over the years. Some videos contain actual sex with Pierre but many are just the interviews.
Since a large part of the hardcore found on the site is of Pierre with a performer then you are stuck with a POV view taken from a single camera on tripod. I knew that going in so it wasn't a problem but for those who dodn't then you might want to reconsider.
My biggest disapointment with the site is that I was hoping for more exclusive material. As it stands you can find some his content on Videobox since they have a couple of Pierre's movies.
I can't see Pierre going for many more years without going all exclusive. How many people will be willing to remain long term members or even be a returning member when a large part of the library is of poor quality and available elsewhere? |
|
05-02-10 06:49pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
186
|
Drilled Sweeties
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A good selection of super cute Russian girls.
-Videos are WMV and can be downloaded in medium, high & HD.
-They also offer IPod and HDV Mac versions.
-Navigation is simple.
-All updates are dated. |
| Cons: |
-There are 32 videos availble.
-Site almost no longer updates.
-This is pure gonzo porn.
-The model's name are different from what we no them under.
-Download speed is approximately 90-120Kb/sec
for the medium videos.
-Pics can only be downloaded individually. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined xcoreclub which is the network that encompasses this site and 3 others. I couldn't review xcoreclub because it's not listed at TBP or PU but then again you have to pick a site and then select access to all sites in the join page anyway.
I recommend that you pick the all access if you choose to join since it's only 10$ more because I don't think any of the sites are worth half the amount they charge. The main theme for each site regardless of it's name is anal sex. All the sites had potential but the lack of regular updates simply makes joining a one time deal. |
|
03-20-10 05:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
187
|
Smack My Bitch
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 200 videos.
-All videos are HD 1280x720.
-They have some of the most beautiful up and coming Russian teen pornstars.
-The main theme is teens and anal sex.
-Updates come regularly and are dated.
-Navigation is simple
-There is dialogue in some of the scenes.
-They offer some description for the action in each scene.
-Some of the scenes involve schoolgirl uniforms. |
| Cons: |
-Most girls are not exclusive to this site so you may have seen them doing similar things on other sites.
-Like similar sites in Europe. The girls name may be different than what you know her under.
-This is mainly a video site. They do have photosets but sometimes only screenshots.
-Only one download option for videoss
-Download speed is a little slow but then again the videos are HD.
-This is still pretty much a gonzo style site so no major premise.
-Some of the content may not be exclusive.
-Older content does not have a description. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because they had some rare anal scenes of my favorite Russian stars and the price of 30$ was good. They have some dialogue but it's sometimes in Russian, which I don't understand but frankly I prefer that to none at all. They have a good selection of cute teens and the scene location, decor and choice of clothes emphasises that teen aspect.
If you like good looking teen girls having anal sex then you will be satisfied.
I'm not sure how I found this but this is the link to the studio where the webmaster buys his content. As far as I can tell, most of theses girls and scenes are or will be found on smack mybitch.com: http://adultlabs.com/new_faces.php
TBP says that the site has been up since January 2010 but the content goes back to May of last year. All I know is that I only started keeping track of it recently. |
|
03-14-10 09:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
188
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-He seems to have the first video from some of todays rising stars.
-He gets the first anal scene from some girls coming into the biz.(see cons)
-The average length of the videos is about 30 minutes to an hour.
-There are over 200 scenes. |
| Cons: |
-Some of the girls are doing their first anal scene and frankly the looks they have on their faces and the sound they make may leave some uncomforatble.
-All the scenes are in POV format and some of the angles are annoying and the camera has a tendency to move since he;s holding it in his nads as he's screwing. As far as I can tell the guy uses 1-2 cameras and edites the scene to show a couple of different views.
-You can only download 4 scenes at a time and it takes about 10-20 min to download a scene.
-The video quality is average at best and you can only download one format(WMV). |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has the potential to be so much better than it is. I think the POV thing has limited appeal. I don't mind some of the scene in POV but at some point I want to see the action from different angles.
This is a one man show and he likes to hear is own voice during the scene. He saves money since he doesn't have to hire any male talent.
The downside is that it's always his tool in each scene. On the plus side. He makes mine look good. |
|
02-14-10 09:46am
Replies (7)
|
Review
189
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have some of the first anal scenes from many of the newest Eastern Europeans girls.
-They currently have over 70 scenes.
-Videos can be downloaded in wmv or h.264 and both come in multiple levels of quality.
-Acess to 30 sites with this membership and I'd say that at least half of those are worth it.
-A reward program that allows you access to more sites whithe the network for each subsequent month you remain a member. |
| Cons: |
-The new site design is still hard to get used to. This is more for returning members.
-Surfing speeds are still a little slow but seem to be imporving.
-The names of the models are not always those seen on other sites.
-The choice of some of the males could be a little better. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that I started keeping track off when it was added to the 21Sextury network. I was tempted to join but I didn't like the bundle of sites offered with the membership. I got access through the reward program for my pix and video membership.
They have some gorgeous models doing anal for the first time and some of them were met-art models. Even the models that have done anal on other site seem to look better here or at least the quality seems to be better.
I highly recommend this site if you like teens getting analyzed. |
|
02-06-10 08:48am
Replies (4)
|
Review
190
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 170 scenes.
-Many of 21Sextury's top young models appear on this site.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV or H.264 as a whole or in sections. The vids come in low to high quality.
-You get immediate access to 30 other sites and half of these are decent or great.
-Photosets can be downloaded zip format |
| Cons: |
-The new network is rather slow and the design takes time to get used.
-Navigation on the new site is annoying because the back button often brings you back to the first page rather than previous one. Not so bad when you're on page 2 but annoying when your on page 8 and the number son screnn stop at page 3. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefered the content in this site rather than Lustygrandmas but this site also suffers from a similar problem. The girls are super hot but some of the male talent isn't. That's not such a bad thing but you have to be aware of it.
If you like to see young women getting fucked by much older men and don't care too much about how they look than you'll love this site. There is some anal and DP mixed into the mix as well. |
|
01-30-10 10:46am
Replies (4)
|
Review
191
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nearly 200 scenes.
-Authentic Grandma looking performers.
-They have both BG/GG scenes.
-Video download options are among the best on the net with WMV and H.264 both at different levels of quality from low to high.
-Photosets can be downloaded whole in zip format.
-Immediate acess to 30 sites from the 21Sextury |
| Cons: |
-The fact that most of their performers truly look like grandmas can be a serious turn off.
-The new network is a little slower than the original (They may still be in the beta stage). |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't join LustyGrandmas but got access with my pix and video membership. I did download a couple of scene, but this truly isn't one of my fetishes. Many of the older performers really look like grandmas. They are much older than a typical cougar, they have higher body fat, many have sagging breast, many have greying hair, and to be honest most are way past their prime and quite a few never had one.
If the above body type appeals to you then this is your site. For the others I'd recommend a quick visit. I'm more of the later so my score is in part because of my lack of interest in this site.
Of course you get quite a few other great sites with your membership so even if this one doesn't appeal to you. The fact that many of the others in the network do might be a great incentive to join. I've noticed that you don't get the same access with each membership so I recommend you always take a look at which site come wqith the mebership and then pick that site knowing you want the other in the network. |
|
01-30-10 08:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
192
|
Everything Butt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some very good anal themed videos with a touch of BSDM added in the mix.
-The anal tends to be more extreme than standard suff(large toys & fisting are common)
-Over 60 scenes in 7 months.
-Surfing and downloading speeds are excellent.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in normal WMV, HD WMV and HD MP4. |
| Cons: |
-The pictures are their biggest drawback because they can't be downloaded in one section but even if they could. The angles and choices of photos leave more to the imagination than show.
-I'm adding a mention about the anal in the cons mostly as a warning for those that might not be into the extreme nature of some of the scenes.
There are some very large toys used in quite a few scenes and anal fisting is also common.
-I'd like a bigger variety of models. The same girl can be in more than one scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
I first noticed this site during the summer but it was just starting and there weren't enough updates to warrant a membership. They had a promotion last month where you got 2 months for the price of one so that was the perfect time to join.
This site is in many ways similar to Whipped ass but the emphasis here is on anal with a mixture of BDSM. Whipped Ass is BSDM with anal added for flavor. I highly recommend this site to anyone interested in a more extreme style of anal sex. The scenes are mostly lesbian anal sex. People looking for standard B/G anal sex should avoid since there are only a couple of scenes.
The one thing that seems to be similar in each video is that these girls are into anal sex and not just there for a paycheck. I'm not saying that they aren't but that they appear to love anal sex. |
|
01-17-10 09:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
193
|
Whipped Ass
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Almost 500 scenes available.
-Post 2003 scenes can be downloaded as a whole.
-Newer videos can be downloaded in HD(WMV & MP4).
-Videos can be streamed.
-One new scene per week(average)
-A good selection of doms and subs.
-Surfing and download speeds are very good.
-They have some truly good looking models.
-Members get a 10$ reduction in price to all of their other sites. |
| Cons: |
-Many of their older videos have a level of BDSM that may not appeal to everyone.
-Photosets can only be downloaded in sections but that's no big deal since they aren't worth downloading in the first place. They are meant to give you a slight idea of what's inside the video.
-Some of the interaction between dom & sub lacks chemistry. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second visit at Whipped Ass and I prefer the direction they seem to have gone with their content. I always felt that their older material had a level of pain inflciting that left me more cold than turned on. It's not too say that their new stuff is tame but there seems to be less intense whipping and caning that left marks on the skin of the models. They also seem to have less verbal abuse.
It's surprising to see some of the models they are able to get for their shoots. I'm not sure if this is because of the change in the level of BDSM, but I'm not complaining.
This is my favorite site within the network and I have no problem recommending it to anyone that likes their lesbian sex mixed in with BDSM. |
|
12-20-09 10:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
194
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A very good selection of models with many of them being amateur or semi-pro.
-You get a feel that the girls truly get off with the machines.
-Post 2004 videos can be downloaded has complete scenes(all othes are zip).
-They have over 550 videos to choose from.
-Members get a special 10$ discount on all their other sites.
-Upadtes come approximately once a week. |
| Cons: |
-The machines are noisy, cumbersome and tend to drag your eyes toward them instead of toward the performer.
-The dildos have a tendency to come out and that often requires that the machine be stopped so that they can reinsert it.
-Photosets can't be downloaded as a whole. You have to download them by section. That's not a big loss because they aren't very good when it comes to showing the action. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I've been aware of this site for many years and I knew that I'd have to join simply to satisfy my curiosity. I can't say that I'm entirely disapointed but I can't see myself rejoining them anytime soon.
Watching a girl have an orgasm or appear to have one (it's hard to doubt the orgasm at times) is quite nice. Specially after what I'm used to seeing in quite a few porns scenes these days.
Their biggest problem is that the site is called Fucking Machines and the machines are partialy the stars of each scene. They are rather weird looking contraptions that make a varying degree of noise. They tend to distract from the action.
The videos are for all intense and purposes solo masturbation scenes but with some very high end vibrator and dildos.
The one really great thing is that membership to one of their sites gives you that automatic 10$ reduction on any and all of their other sites. |
|
12-16-09 06:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
195
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-An excellent selection of models to choose from that cover most ethnicity, age groups and body type.
-They seem to have some exclusive models or at least some that have little to nothing elsewhere.
-A gigantic library of videos.
-Surfing and download speeds are pretty decent.
-The search engine allows to search by using multiple parameters like hair color, body type, fetish and many others.
-They update regularly. |
| Cons: |
-They give titles to each video but more often than not it doesn't include the models name. You have to enter the vid page to see her name.
-Their content is more like semi-pro porn than actual reality porn with little scenarios. I'd compare their content to Reality Kings.
-You can only download a full scene in WMV. You can choose MPG or WMV if you want to dowmload the scene in sections.
-The quality of the newer vids is pretty good but the older stuff is rather poor.
-They do not offer a preview of upcoming updates.
-The photosets aren't very good and screencaps are worse. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm groing through most of the top rated sites joined this one first then my score might have been higher but after seeing Brazzer & Naughty America then this one pales in comparaison.
They lost a few points right at the beginning when I had to click the video page to find the name of the model. You'd think that with a search engine like they have. They'd realise that we want to know the name of the model and we really don't want to click twice to get it.
The fact that they have such a large content and the cost of joining is so low helps them.
They might consider offering more video download options and higher resolution as well. |
|
12-05-09 12:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
196
|
Naughty America
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Another site with sex scenes that have actual scenarios.
-A gigantic library with over 3000 scenes.
-A very good selection of models that cover most age groups and body shapes.
-Their navigation system is quite simple to use and there are multiple methods to reach a model, fetish or particular scene.
-Surfing and download speeds are excellent.
-They offer multiple levels of quality for their videos that include normal to DVD quality. I notice that they also now offer HD on some of the newer videos.
-The price for joining is a plus because I'd expect to pay more for their content. |
| Cons: |
-They have a small video advertising their lives shows that pops open every time your return to the main page.
-They have cross-sale offers that clutter some of their pages.
-Quite a few of their models have implants of varying sizes.
-Some of the scenarios are hit and miss. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Another amazing site with actual scenarios that have a scenario, dialogue, foreplay and pretty good acting(for the most part).
-Their content is similar to Brazzer and Reality Kings. It's a toss up on which of these does a better job. I give extra points to NA for their selection of stars. Their selection of models include more of the upcoming stars.
I highly recommend this site to anyone that still wants an actual story in his/her sex scene. |
|
11-26-09 07:02pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
197
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to the Evil Angel network.
-Special price of 20$ through TBP/PU.
-Large library of material(based on newtwork).
-Early access to scenes from just released dvd's.
-Some exclusive material.(based on network).
-Good Dowload speed.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in WMV and some in Quicktime as well.
-The videos all come in at least medium or high
quality. |
| Cons: |
-The navigation speed within the network is quite bad. Clicking on an icon and waiting 10 seconds or more for a response is quite common.
-The search engine is a mess. Good luck trying to find a specific scene or actress.
-This is mostly non-exclusive material. This is more important for members of videobox that also took the EA option. |
| Bottom Line: |
-In many ways the network feels more like an EA promotional tool than an actual stand alone site.
It makes sense since EA is possibly the top porn studio at the moment and having a site that showcases some of their material is sure to attract more buyers to their dvd's.
-The network has potential and if one day they decide to improve it then I would recommend it.
The way it stands at this moment. I would stay away. The satisfaction you may get is not worth the frustration you are sure to receive.
-I think EA should decide if they need or want a stand alone network or simply make their entire library available to sites like Videobox. It's less profitable through Videobox, but you get far more traffic.
-I debated what score to give them. I love most of EA's stuff and any site gives me acces to their content is great. That would be worth a high 90 score, but the navigation speed kills it for me. I don't have the patience needed to find what I want. |
|
11-01-09 08:53am
Replies (2)
|
Review
198
|
Brazzers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Porn with actual little stories that have good camera work, some hot sex, a decent run time, and dialogue.
-A good variety of women from young to cougars. I'd say that they have an emphasis more toward milfs and large breast(quite a few implants).
-Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats as a complete scene or in multiple sections.
-Navigation is user friendly with many different methods to find a certain scene or fetish.
-The surfing inside the site and download speed is very good to excellent.
-Regular updates(about 3 per day).
-The ability to see some of the upcoming updates.
-The price is amazing for all that you get. |
| Cons: |
-too many women with fake breast and a few with some scary sizes.
-They tend to use the same actress all the time.
-The stories are hit and miss with some of the premises not being to everyone's taste
-Some of the navigation highlights don't always match the content inside the scene.
-The comments attached to each scene could use a good moderator. I found the language used in some of them to be lacking in good manners. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been aware of this site for years but kept putting off joining. I don't know why I didn't join sooner. I was pleasantly pleased with just about everything that this network offers.
I really liked the little stories. There are some that are good and quite afew that are really bad, but not necessarily in the ses as much as the corny dialogue or storyline.
My major complain is all the fake breasts. I prefer small breast but I can enjoy women that have larger breast. It's just that some of the performers have near blimp sized implants.
The male performers seem to come from a small
pool of talent. That is problem if a particular
actor annoys you because the scene is ruined, regardless of how hot the woman is.
They offer HD videos to long term members with
6 months or more. I'm glad for those willing to take the offer but that's not me. Not too mention but HD can be a real downer on some of their performers. I suspect that HD makes your small imperfections much larger. If your main perfomers have breast implants with minor scars well HD can make those scars quite large. |
|
10-29-09 07:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
199
|
Little Mutt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some truly amazing looking young women.
-A Good mixture of videos and stills
-The price of 15$.
-Cancelling is very easy. |
| Cons: |
-This site might be the slowest one I have ever joined. I don't know if they've been having some server problems in the last 30 days but how bad can it be when it takes about 3hrs to download a 7 minutes video?
-Navigation from page to page isn't better. It can take from a few seconds to a minute for the page to fully open. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've had my eye on this site for quite some time and when I noticed that we could get it for 15$ then I thought that I'd give it a try. Needless to say I can't tell you how good or bad this site is because trying to view or download the content requires more patience then I've got.
I wish that I could recommend this site because I think they have some good material but I have only been able to download about 6 videos and I can't be bothered to wait the all the hours it would require to scroll through their content.
I've emailed them to see what's happening so if I get a reply then I will amend this review but for now. I'd stay away from the site. |
|
10-11-09 10:01am
Replies (10)
|
Review
200
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Membership gives you access to 14 other sites.
-Download speed is quite good using I.E and no dowmload manager.
-They have over 1000 videos in the network.
-The sex is all interracial going from mild to intense.
-There are quite a few videos with a little scenarios which adds to the fantasy aspect.
-A good choice of models with a greater emphasis on milf.
-Blacks on Blonde appears to still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-Blacks on blondes and Glory Hole seem to be the only 2 sites still releasing new content. It's difficult to tell because although they give you the release dates on the sites. I don't believe that they are accurate.
-The quality from site to site or from older to newer material is of varying quality.
-The more recent videos can be downloaded whole or in 3 parts but quite alot of the older material on the other sites is in multiple parts.
-Some of the sites do not have the option of downloading the complete set in one file. |
| Bottom Line: |
The main reason why I joined was because you got access to Spring Thomas and Katie Thomas with the membership. I've had my eye on the 3 sites for a long time. I wouldn't have joined them individually but in a package it was difficult to pass up.
I think this a very good join, download all the content you want and then don't comeback for a long time. I'm pretty sure Spring and Katie are no longer updating and most of the other sites are variations of black on blondes.
If you like IR, gangbang, milf, cum swallowing style of sex than you should give these guys a try. |
|
09-27-09 09:30am
Replies (2)
|
