| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A very good selection of models with many of them being amateur or semi-pro.
-You get a feel that the girls truly get off with the machines.
-Post 2004 videos can be downloaded has complete scenes(all othes are zip).
-They have over 550 videos to choose from.
-Members get a special 10$ discount on all their other sites.
-Upadtes come approximately once a week. |
| Cons: |
-The machines are noisy, cumbersome and tend to drag your eyes toward them instead of toward the performer.
-The dildos have a tendency to come out and that often requires that the machine be stopped so that they can reinsert it.
-Photosets can't be downloaded as a whole. You have to download them by section. That's not a big loss because they aren't very good when it comes to showing the action. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I've been aware of this site for many years and I knew that I'd have to join simply to satisfy my curiosity. I can't say that I'm entirely disapointed but I can't see myself rejoining them anytime soon.
Watching a girl have an orgasm or appear to have one (it's hard to doubt the orgasm at times) is quite nice. Specially after what I'm used to seeing in quite a few porns scenes these days.
Their biggest problem is that the site is called Fucking Machines and the machines are partialy the stars of each scene. They are rather weird looking contraptions that make a varying degree of noise. They tend to distract from the action.
The videos are for all intense and purposes solo masturbation scenes but with some very high end vibrator and dildos.
The one really great thing is that membership to one of their sites gives you that automatic 10$ reduction on any and all of their other sites. |
|
12-16-09 06:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
77
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 14 sites.
-Over 800 scenes at the moment.
-They now post new updates as well as upcoming scenes.
-Navigation between each site is easy.
-Download speed is very good.
-The models are all in their late teens to early 20's.
-99% of the models are beautiful to gorgeous.
-The theme for most of the sites is anal and DP.
-Youg throats being the exception sice it's all about blowjobs.
-The style of sex is more gonzo and extreme.
-Movies are wmv and can be download in one file or by section(average video length is 20+ mins).
-You can stream the videos by sections and they offer speeds from dial up to broadband. |
| Cons: |
-Although they advertise 14 sites. Only 7 seem to still be updating regularly.
-They don't date their content so it is difficult
to know the amount of new content compared to the older stuff.
-The sex is mostly gonzo and that means the same sets all the time(bed, sofa, room), no talking,
no scenario and that gets rather tedious.
The names of the models are likely different then what they are on other sites.
-This network is and as always been expensive. At nearly 50US$, it may not be in everyone's budget. |
| Bottom Line: |
I join this network maybe every 18 months. They haven't really improved all that much since the last time but they also haven't really lost any ground.
They have added the following sites since my last membership: Spermantino, Little Hell Cat, Ass to mouth, Double Teamed teens, and ass to mouth. Of course that adds to the overall content within the network but many of the performers already performed similar sex scenes in another one of the site within the network.
They don't seem to be updating very often in many of these and they stpped updating at Teach my ass a while ago.
I think that their biggest selling point is that they get some truly gorgeous Russian girls who are just starting in porn to do some very nasty stuff.
In return that is also their biggest problem because girls are for the most part doing their very first scenes. That tends to make the scene look and feel amateurish.
This network should drop the price a little and copy the style of the 21 Sextury network.
I would recommend this network for anyone who doesn't mind the price and is interested in Russian models that perform gonzo sex.
This is a in and out network. You do not join for more than a month and certainly don't join more often than once a year. I'd say the samething if the price was half what it is. They simply do not update enough to warrant a long term membership. |
|
07-26-09 09:47am
Replies (2)
|
Review
78
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The relationship between Chanta as the dominant and her submissive is really good. There are over 100 episodes with updates coming once a week. Membership price is now 19.95 through TBP.
The pre & post interview is a nice touch. You can download the episode in zip files for photos and rar for video. You can also watch in stream format. The torture/pain aspectisn't of the extreme kind. |
| Cons: |
Download of videos are only in Quicktime or WMV.
I'd like to see DIVX included. Some episodes are not with Chanta, but another dom instead. Most of these episodes aren't as good. I'd love to see more anal sex included. I'd also like to see some new blood. Most of the performers have been seen on many other sites of this type. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into this type of fetish then you have to give Chanta's Bitches a try. The cost alone is a giver, since most generally charge 29.95 or more for similar material. Since she mostly does light BDSM, and not the hard/extreme kind. You don't feel that she's trying to inflict pain as much as pleasure. I wish they offered, for an added cost, acces to their other sites see: Fucked and Bound. |
|
12-23-07 11:47am
Replies (1)
|
Review
79
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ There are now over 420 videos to choose from.
+ Still the only site dedicated to this type of fetish.
+ Content is for the vast majority still exclusive (see cons).
+ You can stream all the videos online.
+ You can download all the videos in MP4 and resolution is from low 512 x 288 all the way to HD 1280 x 720p.
+ They even offer the possibility of downloading the videos in four smaller sections in both MP4 and WMV.
+ They have a surprisignly decent selection of models that are willing to do this type of fetish.
+ Content is dated and they update every two weeks.
+ You get access to the entire Kink network now(see Cons).
+ You can search by models name. |
| Cons: |
- Their navigation is now a huge mess because the only way to see more content is clicking on the "more" button but all this does is open more videos on the main page.
- The content is no longer truly exclusive since members of VB can also buy the Kink channel and you will find a small portion of this sites content on that channel.
- It's true that you now get access to the entire Kink library but the cost is 50$ to join and fans of this site may not care for any of the other sites so a pretty steep price for just one site.
- This is a video only site so fans of photosets need to look elsewhere.
- Not enough kissing.
- Many of the performer have body art. |
| Bottom Line: |
*It's been a long time since I reviewed this site and I thought it was due an update. In some ways it's better that I review it now than a few months ago because some of the changes at Kink have taken effect and they affect the final score.
*If you are a fan of women who have sex with transsexuals than your options are basically this site or joining Evil Angel who releases the odd video with the same fetish. The good news is that this site is a significantly better option because the same women appearing in the EA videos are already on this site, may even have more than one scene and the sex scenes are better here.
*Each video has a small scenario which often adds a lot to the final product. The various camera angles allows us to see the action from multiple sides and perspectives. One of my pet peeves is that I wish there was more kissing. It's not that there isn't some already and sometimes there is a lot but overall I can't help but feel that the players want to skip over that part of the scene. Most of the transsexuals do a more than adequate job during the penetration part of the scene but for some there is visible limpness and that can reduces the heat level of the scene or can even ruin it.
*This site is sort of easy to recommend because unlike other porn sites with a more common type of sex scene that's found elsewhere. There is no equivalent to TS Pussy. If you are a fan of this type of fetish than you have to join at the very least once. You will probably do like me and join multiple times. That's not a bad idea now that you get access to the entire Kink network. I'm sure you will enjoy some of their other sites as well. |
|
09-12-16 06:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Huge network of sites which give you access to over 3000 videos and their accompanying photosets.
+They have an excellent selection of young Eastern European models.
+They update once a day and all content is dated.
+They have a very good search engine that allows searches based on keywords or the models name.
+There is a synopsis of each scenes content.
+There is a lot of variety in their sex scenes which includes b/g, g/g b/g/g and solo
+Most of the models have multiple scenes. |
| Cons: |
-The vast majority of the sites are now dead and no longer updating.
-They keep adding new sites but then stop adding new content within a few months.
-They recently altered their update schedule where now they release the photoset first and the videos is only released in the follwing day or days.
-Many of the models have more than one scene but sometimes there is not a lot of difference between each of them.
-The older content is not aging well and I don't belive that they plan on remastering any of those scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*These guys recently fixed an issue with their preview site and I'm one of those people that was complaining about that so I thought I should check the site out again. Not much as changed since my last time except to say that the content seems to have improved. I suspect that they have found other sources to fill the void left by Russia's change in policy in regards to shooting porn. That is good news because I was a little distraught the last time.
*Their choice of model is still excellent and the porn is usually well shot, well lit and the action quite good. My only negative is that the male performers are not always as good as they should so the scene does not reach the potential it could have with a better male performer.
*My one big issue with the network, and this is an old one, is that they keep adding new sites to the network all the while stopping to update those that were already quite good. Not to mention that the new sites are not'necessarily that good and even if they are then they will also stop updating it within a very short amount of time.
**I truly hope that their new update schedule has less to do with lack of new content on their part and more some kind of gimmick to make it appear as though they have a brand new scene each day.
**I'm giving the network is better score this time because they have started to add some good content. |
|
05-20-13 09:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
81
|
Mom POV
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many of their models are true unknowns not seen on any other sites.
+They have an excellent mix of models and
+They update with one new video per week.
+All videos can be downloaded in MP4 with a 720x480 resolution.
+Most of the scenes are suprisignly well shot and the sex is often quite good.
+The site is about 2 years old and already has 108 videos.
+A decent percentage of thse milfs do anal.
+You can stream videos in 518x288, 720x405 and 1024x576. |
| Cons: |
-The title of the site makes it clear that you are only going to get POV shots.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then selecting one of the model on that page.
-The content is dated but you have to use a very convoluted way to know the date.
-There is also a scene description but you again have to find that in a convoluted way.
-There are absolutely no pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm pretty sure the people who own and operate girlsdoporn are also responsible for this site. Everything from the site design to the interview to filming style is identical in every aspect except that the guy who shoots for this site seems to know a lot more on how to use a camera than the guy who shoots for girldoporn. Now it is possible that it's the same guy but he does a far superior here than on the other site.
*Here are the important things you need to ask yourself to see if this is the kind of site you would enjoy.
1-Do you like older women(they have some 30years old but most of the women are in their 40's, 50's and even in their 60's.
2-Is body art a problem. Not all the models have ink but a large enough group does that if you have to have all natural then you may want to avoid.
3-Is POV shot porn a negative then avoid since it's all POV. I actually didn't mind it too much and I known for not liking POV.
4-Do you have to have HD content. They don't and even if it's available then I suspect that they do like GDP and make it available only to members who stay with the site for multiple months.
You'll know if you will enjoy the site based on how you answered the above questions or at least on how flexible you are on some of them. I know that I enjoyed the site and have no problem recommending it but there's plenty of room for improvement.
*The first thing would be the addition of an actual camera guy to get different shots but I guess that will never happen since it would make the sites name redundant. They should make the features on the preview section available to the paying members. It would save people like me from opening two seperate pages so that you know what the action in the video will be.
**I did recognize a couple of models from this site on some of Scores sites so they are not all unknowns. |
|
12-09-12 04:58pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
82
|
Mofos Network
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 12 sites with one membership.
+They have over 900 exclusif scenes.
+They offer one very good bonus site that gives you access to over 4000 dvd's.
+They have an excellent selection of young US performers doing some of their first porn shoots.
+They also have a very good selection of models from the US, Europe and South America and they are from different age groups so not limited to just teens.
+Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. You have PSP, iPad and 3GP for mobile devices. You have MPEG, MPEG4 and WMV in standard resolution and you also have MPEG4, 1080 and 720 for High Def.
+All videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies per pic. I saw some at 1333 x 2000 and I also saw some at 1300 x 867. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con for me is the fact that way too many of the videos are shot in POV and this is one of my least favorite shooting style.
-Since many videos are POV then the lighting suffers and that means that some of the shots are not as bright and clear as if it was shot by a cameran instead of the male performer.
-The fact that many of the videos are POV only then it can get repetitious rather quickly.
-I found that too many of the US performers had visible razor burns and pimples.
-They have copied Brazzer and started filming some Live shows but there are only 3 and they are very poor cousin to Brazzers live shoots.
-I'm adding one con in regards to their preview pages. These guys have one of the worst preview page I have ever seen from a large network. I dare anyone to tell me if they can figure out what's available in the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to the network with my membership to let's try anal but I've only downloaded a couple of videos from the different sites in the network so this is not a network that has much appeal for me. The POV is in large part why I haven't been able to download more videos. It would be really amazing if they went to a different format but I don't think that's what they want to do with this network. I have actually downloaded a lot more content from the bonus dvd site I got with my membership. They have many dvd available on Videobox so that might not appeal for eveyone but they also have a pretty decent amount of older movies which are not available except on streaming sites. The quality of these vidoes is hit and miss but I'll still take them.
*If you enjoy POV videos than you should find plenty of stuff to satisfy you from the various sites. Otherwise I would recommend you check if some of the other sites in the network appeal to you. Of course I don't know how you'll be able to do that since their preview pages are awful.
**My score is based more on the content they offer than what i got out of the main network of sites. |
|
01-02-12 09:11am
Replies (5)
|
Review
83
|
Mrs. Siren
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.
*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.
*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me. |
|
08-07-11 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
84
|
Anjanette Astoria
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Production value on many of the videos is very impressive with the use of soundtracks, scripts, dialogue, visual effects and editing.
+Anjanette is a beautiful 38 years old women with natural 36D breast who does hot sex scenes.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4. The resolution varies from 640x352 to 848x480 and the bit rate also varies from 2300 to over 4000 kbps.
+There are 24 videos and they update with 1 new video each week.
**I normally don't put cost as a pros but 10$ for one month is hard to complain about. |
| Cons: |
-The lower video resolution means that videos aren't as crisp on full screen.
-The use of a soundtrack is a good idea but not when the music is nso loud that it overlaps the action.
-The use of visual effects in some of the videos can be a plus or a negative for some members.
-There are 24 videos but some of them are parts of a larger scene.
-There are no real search options and navigation is pretty much limited to next page or previous page.
-There are only 11 photosets and the quantity of pics in each set is tiny. not to mention that you can't download the sets as a complete file. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Anjanette is beautiful woman as well as an excellent sex performer and that adds a lot of heat to the scenes. She's not affraid of doing hardcore so that is also a plus. The main drawback for me is the quality on some of the videos. 848x480 is not bad but 640x352 is. This is a new site so they may address this in future videos.
*-Another necessary improvement will have to be the navigation system. As more content is added then it will be harder for new members to find scenes unless they want to scroll through many pages of videos.
**-Not a necessary improvement but one that will garner her more members are the photosets. A key part of good solo model sites are the many different phototsets that are exclusif to their site. If you are going to offer pics than make sure they are of higher quality, that there are sufficient amounts of pics and can be downloaded as a complete set.
-I could say that if you are a fan of Anjanette then you have to join her site but I personaly had never heard of her until I saw her site on TBP. Now that I know who she is and what she does then I will keep track of her work. Her site is only 10$ so if you think she looks good and want to see her do some hardcore shoots then go ahead. |
|
07-22-11 07:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
85
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*Navigation is quite easy. *Download options for both pictures and videos are amazing. *the selection of women is good and varied. *There is a good choice of taboos offered. *They offer exclusive material. *the download speed is excellent. *The price is reasonable. Updates are pretty regular. |
| Cons: |
Although navigation is made easy, you are required to hit the back button once you've made a selection or you have to retrace your path to the scene you were looking at. The models are all well known eastern european with just a few americans added. I wouldn't mind seeing a trial membership. Except for the download options it's impossible to identify the new scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
I've sampled many of the sites that are part of the DDF family and like them this is a really good site. I'd love it if one day they offered the option of buying at an increase price a membership to a couple or all of their sites. They cover most fetishes with emphasis on spanking and watersports. |
|
11-21-07 07:20pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
86
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusive and they add one new videos every two weeks.
+This is the only American site that produces this type of porn. In fact there may only be one or two other sites on the net that offer similar content.
+You get access to all the other Kink sites.
+The videos can be streamed online.
+The videos can also be downloaded in the MP4 format.
+They have a surprisingly decent variety of performers with many that you wouldn't expect to see in this type of porn.
+The lighting and camera work is excellent. |
| Cons: |
-A few too many of their male talent leave a lot to be desired on looks, wood retention and overall performance.
-A few too many of their female performer sport multiple tattoos.
-The content is sometime a little too hardcore for my taste.
-It's not that unusual to see the same performer appear multiple times on the site.
-Some of the scenarios are just not that good and that makes the finish product that less appealing.
-Navigation is basically scrolling from page to page or searching by performers name. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The name of the site tells you exactly what you get for your money and Kink knows how to deliver. Your basic premise is one woman and at least four guys going non-stop. There is always a little scenario to go with the sex but I find that too often there is little taught put into it and it shows in the finish product.
*My two biggest issues are that a fairly large percentage of their male and female performers sport multiple tattoos and since I'm not a huge fan of those than I will often skip that scene. It also doesn't help that many of their recurring male performers are also performers that work on the gay/Trans side of the industry and that often shows in their looks and performance.
*I understand that budget is very important in this day and age I that's why it limits what Kink can do with some of the scenarios but I sometime wish that they would simply forgo the entire scenario instead of doing a half-ass job at it.
*The one thing that is constant here and with all other Kink sites is that they know how to shoot porn. The lighting is excellent and the camera shots are always top notch. You won't miss any of the action and it will be well lit.
*The fact that you get access to all the Kink site is both a major bonus and somewhat of a let down. The obvious bonus is that you don't need to join multiple Kink sites at for considerable amounts of money like you used to in the past but the downside is that if you are like me and only care for maybe 4 or 5 Kink sites than getting them all doesn't add anything. The fact that main pages shows all of their content means that you will have to scroll through what I consider gay porn. Not a big issue for me but might be one for others. |
|
04-03-17 06:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have a library of over 10,500 movies to chose from.
+They have over 5000 performers to chose from.
+The videos can streamed online.
+The videos can be downloaded in the MP4 format.
+Many of their movies are not available anywhere else(except VOD sites).
+Many of the movies are in their original language(see cons).
+Many of the movies have tag words to help search for specific types of scenes.
+You can also search by production year, models name or just the first letter of the movie.
+They have added a series of photos to most of the performers portfolio and some appear to be from fans(they can't be downloaded). |
| Cons: |
-The site stopped updating on March 11 and it's not looking like they are about to start anytime soon.
-The video quality is varies a lot from movie to movie but it rarely gets better than mediocre to good.
-Because many of their movies aren't made in the USA than at least 1/3 are in a language other than English.
-It's common for an American made movie not to be in English because their source material is from another Country that the US.
-They haven't tagged all the movies so doing a search by keywords won't give all the possible results.
-The content is primarily from the 70's and 80's with a percentage from the 90's so not likely to appeal to anyone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This has always been one of my favorite sites because they have some of my favorite movies of all time and now that it appears that they are dead than I honestly don't know where I can go to find all those amazing classic porn movies from by gone days.
*Now I can understand why many people especially those under the age of thirty who would never join a site like this because the bulk of their movies are scenario driven where the sex scenes are often much shorter than today and the video quality is not all that stellar but to those people I say that there is a reason why many of these are true classics that are worth seeing if for no other reason than the people who produced them understood how to make movies and not just shoot porn.
*Another huge appeal for me is that because a portion of their movies are in their original language than movies made in France are in French and for someone like me who speaks French that is amazing.
*The reasons why I'm still giving this site a pretty good score is because their library is huge, they only offer a one month or three month membership and they made some improvements since my last membership. |
|
03-27-17 06:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
88
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 80,000 movies to choose from.
+They have the partial to entire library of movies from most porn studios.
+They update with internet content as well as studio made movies.
+They have exclusive access to some porn studios as well as internet only studios content.
+They update on a daily basis.
+They have multiple tag words attached to their movies/scenes to help narrow the search.
+They have a search matrix that allows users to search for content using a series of options like the setting, sexual positions, type of sex acts, gender orientations and even if there are accessories used in the movie.
+It is Roku Compatible so you can watch all the content on your big screen HD TV.
+It is possible to change the interface language to seven different dialects. |
| Cons: |
-They have less movies from some of the big studios than their competitor Hot Movies.
-Normally not a con but in this case hard to not mention it is the rather high cost of streaming. You get approximately 200 minutes for 30$.
-The site design could use some streamlining because 1/4 of the viewable page is wated on options that aren't necessary except maybe on the front page.
-Some of the content uses twice as much minutes as the other movies.
-The quality of the vids varies greatly based on when the movie was produced or which company produces the movie/scene.
-The search results for the performers name are sequential but you have to scroll through page numbers to find a particular model.
-I find the box cover pics to be a little small.
-The scene tags aren't always accurate and not comprehensive enough to make searching by keywords 100% effective. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the first streaming site that I joined many years ago and the one that I come back to because they have the content from a few studios that aren't available elsewhere. The other big advantage is that they now supplement their updates with internet only studios and quite a few clips4sales stores.
*The problem with a minute based streaming site like this as opposed to a membership based one is that watching a movie gets to be pretty expensive and although you can rent for two days or a life time. These two options are only worth it if you really expect to want to watch that movie many times.
*It's impossible to avoid comparing this site to Hot Movies. This one comes out the loser in site design and possible the overall number of movies from some of the big studios but for the rest they tend to be quite similar.
*Something to watch out for is that although they have a great search matrix. The results it gives are based on the entire movie so there may not be an actual scene with every parameter you selected as much as different scenes where the results are spread among all of them.
*I'm sure I could name a few of the exclusive studios that are available only on this site but the only one that comes to mind Max Hardcore. They don't have his entire library but they still have 107 of his movies.
*I think that this site is a must for fans of older porn, fans of internet made porn or fans of some of the more popular clips4sale stores. Yes it is expensive but well worth buying a certain number of minutes that you can use over many weeks. |
|
11-28-16 06:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-07-14 03:23pm (Update History)
Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
|
| Pros: |
+There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either. |
| Cons: |
-They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites
*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.
*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.
*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.
I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues. |
|
10-05-14 11:02am
Replies (4)
|
Review
90
|
Oldje
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership. |
| Cons: |
-They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.
*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.
*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.
**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**. |
|
02-02-13 10:53am
Replies (8)
|
Review
91
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to over 127 movies or 620 scenes.
+All the content is dated.
+They appear to update with one new scene every 2 days or so.
+All the videos can be downloaded in at least 640x480 resolution but at least 150 of them can also be downloaded in 1080p.
+You can view all the pics online and they offer 3 possible rseolution: 1024x680, 1280x852 and 1600x1060.
+You can download all the photosets in a single zip file and they aoffer the same resolution as the online versions.
+Jules used to be able to get some of the top women in porn to do a lot more hardcore stuff than they had previoulsy done.
+All the scenes have multiple tags and it's possible to do a search by keyword. |
| Cons: |
-A percentage of the content is not exclusif.
-Jules decided to start another site sometime after this one so part of the content that should have come to this site is on the new one.
-They don't release all the scenes from a movie even though that movie is on the site.
-It's hard to tell whether the site will update using newer movies or if he's going to use older stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the best site for any fan of Jules Jordan movies or at least the younger version ofJules as a lot of the movies are a couple of years to many years old. Mind you that's actually a huge advantage since I find that his earlier stuff is far superor to what he tends to relesae these days. Hopefully he will keep adding new content from his older movies rather than the newer stuff or at least a mix of bothe.
*Now if you aren't familair with Jules then he's is on a very short list of directors able to get top stars to do some pretty hardcore stuff. He has always been known for gonzo porn and anal is common in his movies(at least the early ones). He cares that the women appearing in his movies look both beautiful and desirable. To that end. He'll usually make sure that they wear appropriate makeup and that their hair is well done. He will then spend a large amount of time shooting the girls from a wide variety of angles so that we get to enjoy her beauty. There is rarely any transition in his movies so girls are first oggeld and then they meet the guy or guys and the sex begins.
*If what I described above appeals to you then you have to join this site at least once. Of course if it doesn't then you should avoid it. Be advised that he's not into lesbian porn so anyone looking for this type of content from him should also avoid the site because it doesn't really exist. |
|
01-07-13 06:55pm
Replies (12)
|
Review
92
|
Naughty America
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are over 5000 scene to choose from.
+They have a great mix of mostly US performers from teens to women of varying ages.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search by keywords.
+You can stream the videos online.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV and they started to offer the Quicktime version sometime in 2007. Video resolution from 2007 and onward is at least 720x400.
+Videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in two HD format: 720p and 1080p.
+You can view or download the photosets that accompany each scene.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with about a dozen new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-They actually have two real time feeds for cam sites running on a couple of their main pages.
-They have two side tabs on the right of the screen that have to be closed each time you change pages and although not that big. they are still a distraction.
-I didn't see a method to scroll back through their library so that you can see all their content. The only way you can view content past two months is if you use the porn finder option and select a tag word. Of course if the scene was not proprerrly tagged then you willnever find it.
-Using the back button to return to your previous page wil always bring you back to the first page no matter on what page you were.
-The site is clutered with advertising for their own sites or for third party stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
***The 5$ join price was impossible to pass up. Especially for fans of sites like Brazzer, Bangbros and Reality King. There are some variations in the sites but they all pretty much offer the same type of content and they tend to also hire the same performers. This site may be a litttle more geared toward the couples market or at least people interested in scenario driven kind of porn. Now just because it might be more couple friendly does not mean that the sex isn't hot and raunchy because it is.
**If anyone saw my exchange with a webmaster on a recent review in regards to live feeds of cam sites then you can imagine that this site lost a lot more points because they actually have two of these. I'm sorry that sites feel the need to do that to make money but if they must then the least they can do is make sure that it is in a section that must be selected and not on the main pages of the site.
**There is a lot of advertising clutering the site and this takes up a lot of screen space. You even have to close one pop up and skip over an advertising page each time you log in.
**The bottom line is that for 5$ or even the normal 10$. You will more than get your moneys worth and even the annoying advertising and the stupid live feeds shouldn't be such a problem.
***My score would have been in the 90's if it wasn't for the live feeds.*** |
|
10-13-12 11:42am
Replies (6)
|
Review
93
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+414 videos and they add a new one each week.
+All videos can be dowloaded in multiple formats like WMV and MP4 and resolution is at least 640x360.
+They started offering HD quality videos in 2010 so you can now download the 100 most recent ones in 1920x1080.
+They have 414 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution for the last 100 sets is 1200x800.
+They have a surprisingly wide variety of models.
+You get access to 8 other sites.
+Content for this site appears to be all exclusif. |
| Cons: |
-Resoution for 300 of their videos is at best 640x360.
-Resolution for 300 of their phototsets is 560x840.
-Although you get access to 9 other sites. Only 3 of them are still updating.
**Many of the toys are huge so less a con and more a warning for anyone looking for midcore style penetration.** |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was hard to pass up. It's not that 30$ is a high price to pay but the content is on the extreme side of things and I'm not always in the mood for that kind of porn.
*The most surprising thing about this site and some of the other in the network is that you don't expect all of their models to do such extreme penetration and I'm not just talking about vaginal either. They use some really big toys which is a plus for me but I have to be in the mood otherwise the content is too extreme and I don't enjoy it. The only sites that are still updating are brutal fisting and huge strapon lesbians. These sites share many of the same models so it's not unusual to see a model on all 3 sites. I'm also pretty sure that the content on the sites that are no longer updating is not exclusif.
*If you are in the mood for extreme penetration than this site and 2 of the other in the network should more than satisfy your needs but if you like midcore style penetration then stay away because you will really hate what you see.*
**I think they should really work on the preview sections because this would greatly help anyone visiting for the first time to see that they are still upodating and what you get for your money.** |
|
03-26-12 09:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
94
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Roxy is at the top of the list for extreme anal queen of the US.
+She has 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and you get low or high quality(resolution for HQ is 960x540)
+There are 56 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. (Resolution is 800x1200).
+They update every day or two and content is all dated.
+You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-There is a lack of variety in the different types of videos shoots because over 50 of them are of Roxy inserting various objects in her ass.
-She loves the extreme side of anal so you see her rosebud quite often.
-All the phototsets are from the video shoots so nothing extra. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Roxy is a such a cute girl that it's hard to believe that she's into extreme anal insertion. That's the good news for me. The bad one is that she's a little too extreme for my taste. I love seeing anal but seeing a girl try to push different size objetcs out of her is interesting but not necessarily sexually stimulating. Then there is the appearance of her rosebud in some of the videos and that's a major problem for me. I can't look at a girls rosebud. I'm glad that they seem to have no problem playing with it and don't seem to have any health issues but I still don't want to see it.
**This is a decent site for anyone looking for a girl that's into pushing different objhects out of her anal cavity and enjoy doing it. I really belive that Roxy loves this. Since m,any of the other sites have similar content than that's also a plus.**
***This site and most of the other whithin the network should be avoided by anyone who's not into extreme porn. Otherwise you will be very disapointed by the content***. |
|
08-04-11 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
95
|
Naughty Alysha
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Alysha is an attractive blue eyed blond milf with large breast who seems to prefers extreme penetration sex to anything else.
-There are over 1000 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV. They also offer MP4 on some videos.
-There are almsot 1000 photosets and they can all be downloaded as complete zip files. Newer sets are 1225x816.
-You get acces to 8 more sites.
-The content is dated and they are still adding to the site. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con for me is that although there are many videos. More than 2/3 of these last only a few seconds long to a couple of minutes.
-Older photosets have really poor resolution so likely not worth saving.
-They have a search engine but I can't figure how to use it and the design is likely to cause more headache than anything else.
-The content gets repetitous to the point where one scene looks identical to another one. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Naughty Alysha is quite naughty and into some serious penetration (mostly Vaginal). She uses some really large toys to penetrate herself and when one is not enough then she'll use a couple instead. mind you some of the toys she uses are so large that it would be impossible to use more than one.
-She's a beautiful woman and a good performer. I wish she would do more standard B/G or G/G content than the extreme penetration stuff. It's moderately interesting the first few times but gets tiresome after you've seen it done a half dozen times.
-Her site is a good mix for the network because most of them are into this type of porn and that is a good thing if you like extreme penetration porn. To be avoided by anyone who does not want to see a woman insert a toy that is larger than a childs head or double fisted. |
|
07-18-11 02:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Sara Jay
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Sara Jay is a large breasted blond pornstar in her early 30's who loves to have sex and doesn't mind being filmed doing it.
-There are more than 275 videos which are broken down in different categories like hardcore, G/G, Interracial, solo and a couple of other as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV 640x480 2735 kbps, MP4 these come in a couple of possible resolution but it can be as low as 400x300 1211 kbps and the Quicktime videos are 500x282 925 kbps.
-There are over 275 photosets and these can be downloaded as complete zip file. The number of pics per set and resolution varies from set to set.
-Site updates with new content every week.
-You get fee access to the networks cam shows and they post the time and date that shows are happening.
-Sara post her club appearances in the different US cities
-You can view all her Twitter post and she seems to love Twitter.
-You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-Although the videos come in 3 different formats.
They all suffer from average quality when viewed full screen. It's more noticeable on some videos.
-Far too many of the videos are broken parts of a complete scene. I would understand if the scenes were very long but most of them are 30 minutes scenes.
-Content is dated but that date is misleading since TBP says the site was launched in 2006 and the oldest video or photoset has a 2009 date. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Here is a solo model site that does almost everything right from offering multiple video formats to allowing members to download photos as complete sets. Posting a schedule of her club appearances is a good idea since it allows her fans the chance to possibly meet her at one of those locations.
-The biggest issue for me is video quality since I'm a mostly video guy. They should consider remastering the videos to improve the quality.
-If you are a fan of sara than you can't pass up this opportunity.
-If you aren't into interracial content then avoid because she really enjoys that kind of sex whether B/G or G/G. |
|
07-18-11 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
97
|
Karup's PC
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 900 hardcore videos.
-Over 2800 softcore videos.
-Over 11,000 photosets to choose from and more than 1900 of these are hardcore shoots.
-Over 2000 models to choose from
-They have a search system that helps members find a specic type of video or photoset.
-They update daily and all their content is dated |
| Cons: |
-This is primarily a softcore photoset site.
-A little more than half of the hardcore videos are B/G. 1/3 are G/G only and the rest are solo stuff.
-About half of the hardcore videos are in parts only. It's much worse for the softcoire videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a hard site for me to review beause I can see how amazing it must be for people that like photosets. There is such a large amount to be found here that a month may not be enough to find all that you would want. I'm primarily a video guy so this site leaves me a disapointed because there is just not enough to satisfy my needs. You then add the fact that many models have hardcore photosets but no accompanying video and that just increases my frustration.
-I was able to find about 5 rare videos that I don't believb can be found anywhere else and they are of models that have only done hardcore for this site.
-People that prefer photosets should find more than enough to satisfy their desires.
-This might also satisfy some video fnas but this depends on the type of hardcore you prefer.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I was able to download. |
|
06-18-11 09:07am
Replies (2)
|
Review
98
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They currently have 100 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Access to 5 other sites with one membership.
-Most videos come in at least standard 1024x576 AVI and a large part also include HD 1280x720.
-Videos can be streamed in Flash.
-Many photosets can be viewed online and they can all be downloaded as a single zip file.
-You can vote on your favorite girl or video and post comments. |
| Cons: |
-The same model can appear on more than one site where she performs similar sex acts.
-Download speeds aren't bad but you can usually download a maximum of 4 videos at the same time and sometimes only 2. You cannot surf any of the sites once you havw reached your maximum number of downloads because their server will give you an error message.
-Many of the models are given a name different then what we know them under.
-The dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitle.(that might annoy some).
-As the title implies. This is a site where we are meant to believe that these everyday girls are picked up by these guys and inticed into having sex on camera.(it doesn't really work). |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a pretty good site as long as you don't care about the little scenarios and the dialogue that's in Russian. The scenarios didn't work for me because I recognized the performers and they are all pornstars.
The download speeds and the fact that you can only download a maximum of 4 videos and often only 2 videos is a little annoying. This is compounded by the fact that surfing the site and network is impossible during those periods.
-Membership gives you access to 5 other sites.
The only site that might include lease content is chickiporn and that's why I won't review it.
studentsexparties.com
cashforsextape.com
hardfucktales.com
porntraveling.com
chickiporn.com |
|
12-31-10 08:32am
Replies (6)
|
Review
99
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 120 videos
-They update once a week.
-A mixture of European and American performers.
-They film in different locations than those normally used for other Kink shoots and some of these are outside locations.
-The models are not all well known performers.
-Videos can be downloaded in either WMV or mp4 and version comes in normal & HD quality.
You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-Photosets are broken in 4 sections and although
you can download each section whole. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.
-Each shoot as bystanders that aren't part of the action and I found that more distracting than anything else.
-The camera angles aren't always the greatest and that deducts from the enjoyment.
-I didn't enjoy a single one of the videos that are shot outside. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the second kink site that does little for me. Ultimnate Surrender is the other one. This one is more centered on sex but most of the shoot left me unsatisified. I think the main thing that bothers me is the addition of an audience for each shoot. The camera will from time to time pan toward the audience and then back to the girl and frankly that does nothing for me.
This site should appeal to people that like to watch porn with an audience but for the others I'd recommend a site like sex and submission. |
|
11-28-10 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Explicite Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Currently over 300 models being offered.
-The scenes can be simple interviews to lesbian and all the way to hardcore sex that can include anal, DP and some fisting action.
-The downloads are extremle fast.
-Videos can be downloaded in Divx, Mpeg, Wmv, Ipod and Quicktime.
-Photosets can be downloaded as individual or in zip format. THey are crisp and clear.
-Navigation is quite simple.
-Access to some of John Roots movies |
| Cons: |
-I can't be certain but the I expected a lot more updates based on my last membership July 07.
-Although they have a large models base to pick from. Many of these have maybe 1 or 2 photosets.
-Many of the videos have an amateur feel to them.
-There aren't any sets. It's usually a bed, couch office desk or chair.
-The navigation is in English but the content is almost exclusively in French.
-The cost is around 25-30$US. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I joined Explicite was in 07 and at the time they had a promotion that gave you full access for 5$. The current cost is 26$ and I would have no problem recommending this site for them but I would be more cautius for any older members looking to rejoin.
Although the language can be an issue for some. I speak French so that isn't an issue and is in fact a definite plus.
They truly have some gorgeous girls doing some fairly nasty stuff. Many of todays rising French pornstars had humble beginnings with this site.
This is one of the few and maybe the only sites that offers has many video download options. |
|
04-13-09 07:58pm
Replies (0)
|
