| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Susan Reno
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get access to the content from 13 other amateur sites.
-There are over 100 videos.
-They now offer many of the videos in longer clips and there are less of them as well.
-The action is pretty good for an amateur site.
-Susan appears to still be updating with new content(see Cons).
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-I don't believe that Susan is still doing porn because all the content appears to be remastered or never released videos.
-None of the content is dated.
-You can't get any videos on a single file so you have to attach 2 or more to get the complete videos.
-Photos can only be downloaded individually.
-Many of the videos have similar action in them so you get pretty much the same type of sex scene but with different male performers.
-Quality of the videos is hit and miss on many of the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Susan is an attactive 40yrs old blond MILF that really enjoys her IR, Anal and ganbangs sex and doesn't mind us seeing it. Her site is the best one out of all the others you get access to and she also has the most content.
-I was able to find a couple of pretty good videos on her site and some of the other sites in this network but the quality is average for most of them because this is still amateur porn.
-I found the 24.95$ price a little high but I didn't use that in my score because you still get a lot of content for that kind of money. It's not their fault if I didn't has much as I thought I would. |
|
03-27-11 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
177
|
Freddie's World
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusive.
-Over 150 videos.
-Most of the models appear to be unknows rather than professionals so this adds an amateur feel to the videos.
-They update with one new video a week. |
| Cons: |
-Many of the scenes lack decent lighting so the action is often hard to see properly.
-The scenes star almost exclusively Freddie so that can be a plus if you enjoy him and major negative if he annoys you.
-I found that the same performers are in too many videos.
-Navigation on the site is annoying because you can only move forward or backward by scolling one page at a time and no way to skip a page or pages. That's a pian when you want to see the updates on page 15 because you'll still have to scroll through the first 14. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a simple site of a an older gentleman who has sex with a variety of women ranging in age from late teens to early 40's and films it for us to see. The camera angles aren't too bad and the action is pretty good. The only thing that hurts this site is that the lighting could be better but I guess you'd lose the amateur feel to some of the scenes.
The other big thing that hurts it is the fact that too many of the videos star the same 2 women
Angel and Tracy Lain. |
|
03-19-11 11:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
178
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Most of their content appears to be exclusif.
-They have some of the only hardcore scenes from certain models.
-A very good selection of teen models.
-Videos can be downloasded in low, Med or high quality(all WMV).
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete zip file(resolution 1200x800).
Content is dated and they appear to update every 5 days.
-They have a little over 500 videos and more than 600 photosets in their library. |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds are pretty poor. I could use a download manager but I could only download one file at a time and surfing the site would kill my download speed.
-Some of their content is leased.
-Some of the male performers in the videos seem to be the models boyfriend so it adds a certain amateur style to the videos but this can be distracting since they aren`t pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a decent site with some good content & cute teens doing a mixture softcore, midcore and hardcore shoots but the download speeds make it hard to recommend. This might be a temporary situation because I don`t remember having that problem the first week I joined the site.
My score is based in large part to the speed issue and not so much the content. This is a good site if you like to see Eastern European teens having sex. |
|
02-20-11 09:40am
Replies (5)
|
Review
179
|
Tricky Old Teacher
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusive material.
-They update with 2-3 new videos each month.
-A very good selection of Eastern Europeans teen girls.(most are well know porn performers)
-There is a little scenario with a much older teacher coercing the teen into having sex with him.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format (1200x800). |
| Cons: |
-There is only one video download option (WMV) and no choice in the possible resolution.
-The dialogue is all in Russian and that's too bad because it would add a major element to the scenes.
-They could use a little more foreplay with some added kissing between the players.
-It would be nice if they gave the players the correct name and even more so if they gave her the same one for all of their sites.
-They have a search by model option but because of the above issue with names then I wonder why they offer it. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is probably the one site in this network that has the potential to be much better and I don't think they need to make too many changes for that to happen.
They could offer some English dialogue or at the very least subtitles so that we can get into the little scenarios. As it is you can only guess at what is said(unless you speak Russian) and please make sure that the same model doesn't have a different names from site to site.
-If you like the older/younger fetish and can overlook the Russian dialogue then you should enjoy this site. |
|
01-17-11 09:52am
Replies (6)
|
Review
180
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to 28 other sites with one membership.
-They have a nice selection of European teen models to choose from.
-Navigation from site to site is made easy by including a link of each site on the main pages of each site.
-They update with one new scene a week.
-Photos can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in one zip file. The pci resolution is 800x1200.
-Videos can be streamed in WMV and Flash.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV but with only one video quality of 832x468. |
| Cons: |
-This is still a very small site.(43 videos)
-Many of the models can be found on other sites performing similar sexual acts.
-Although you get access to a large network of sites. Most aren't updating anymore.
-They offer only one video download option and no choice in the quality of the vids.
-Many of the models are given names that aren't the ones we might know them by.
-Some of their content is leased material. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I found that a lot of the content on this site and a couple of the others within the network is very similar to what can be found elsewhere and for less than the cost of their membership. They still offer a couple of unusual sites to make the visit worth it.
-You should only join if you want access to the other sites within the network because there is not enough content here to justify the cost of a 30$ membership.
-Be advised that only 6 other sites are still updating with new content. She made us lesbians, tricky old teacher, amour babes, horny thief tales, 18 virgin sex, and spoiled virgins. |
|
01-09-11 11:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
181
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments. |
| Cons: |
-Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number, |
| Bottom Line: |
-I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.
-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.
-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.
-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them. |
|
12-31-10 10:50am
Replies (4)
|
Review
182
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a nice mix of female body types.
-Many of the girls are amateurs or new to the porn biz.
-Nearly 150 videos.
-Videos appear to all be wmv.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-No photos of any kind.(screencaps would have been nice).
-Only one page so you have to keep scrollig down to find the next videos.
-You can only download 4 videos and that's with or without a download manager.
-All the scenes are POV and he uses a couple of cameras to give you different perspectives but the editing is so bad that some of the shot are of the guy playing with the camera while many of the others ones show bad angles of the action.
-All the scenes are filmed in the same office the desk or the floor.
-The guy never stops talking and that's fine in the interview part but you would hope that once the actions starts that he'd shut-up.
-The guy doesn't want to be identified so you have a pixelated circle whenenever there is a chance that we might see his face. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has some good looking girls and most of these have never made it unto my porn radar so I was curious to see them in action. After having joined this site then I can honestly say, that I'm still curious to see them in action.
I'm glad that this guy has money to get girls to have sex with him on camera and his choice of girls is very good but I wish he cared enough about his customers to allow us to see them in action. Get a camera man or get a performer but don't try to be both.
If you want to see some really cute amateurs have sex and don't mind talking during the sex and the less than stellar camera shots then you might enjoy this site. |
|
12-11-10 07:09pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
183
|
Jim Slip
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 500 scenes(all of them dated).
-The site updates with about 4 scenes per month.
-A good navigation system that allows searches like hair color, body type, fetish and more.
-Jim employs models that come in a wide variety of body types and age groups.
-Models names are those we know them by.
-Videos starting in mid 2009 can be downloaded as complete scenes as well as clips. |
| Cons: |
-All the videos are still broken down in clips ranging from 5 to 15 or more.
-Download speed is pretty slow. I couldn't download more than 7 clips at a time.
-Only the most recent videos can be streamed.
-Video quality is average(you can forget HD).
-There is only one male star(Jim) so you have to like him or you'll waste your money.
-I didn't see where you can download the photos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is not a bad site but it lost points the moment that I realised it was still offering all the videos in small clip format. It's true that a portion can now be downloaded as a whole scene but the older videos should also be remastered as whole scenes.
-If you can overlook the fact that the videos are still small clips and you like an older man that has sex sex with young girls than this site might appeal to you. Jim hires a good selection of English and Eastern Europeans models for his shoots. You will recognize many of them since they use their own name, at least the one I know them under. |
|
06-09-10 07:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-He seems to have the first video from some of todays rising stars.
-He gets the first anal scene from some girls coming into the biz.(see cons)
-The average length of the videos is about 30 minutes to an hour.
-There are over 200 scenes. |
| Cons: |
-Some of the girls are doing their first anal scene and frankly the looks they have on their faces and the sound they make may leave some uncomforatble.
-All the scenes are in POV format and some of the angles are annoying and the camera has a tendency to move since he;s holding it in his nads as he's screwing. As far as I can tell the guy uses 1-2 cameras and edites the scene to show a couple of different views.
-You can only download 4 scenes at a time and it takes about 10-20 min to download a scene.
-The video quality is average at best and you can only download one format(WMV). |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has the potential to be so much better than it is. I think the POV thing has limited appeal. I don't mind some of the scene in POV but at some point I want to see the action from different angles.
This is a one man show and he likes to hear is own voice during the scene. He saves money since he doesn't have to hire any male talent.
The downside is that it's always his tool in each scene. On the plus side. He makes mine look good. |
|
02-14-10 09:46am
Replies (7)
|
Review
185
|
Little Mutt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some truly amazing looking young women.
-A Good mixture of videos and stills
-The price of 15$.
-Cancelling is very easy. |
| Cons: |
-This site might be the slowest one I have ever joined. I don't know if they've been having some server problems in the last 30 days but how bad can it be when it takes about 3hrs to download a 7 minutes video?
-Navigation from page to page isn't better. It can take from a few seconds to a minute for the page to fully open. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've had my eye on this site for quite some time and when I noticed that we could get it for 15$ then I thought that I'd give it a try. Needless to say I can't tell you how good or bad this site is because trying to view or download the content requires more patience then I've got.
I wish that I could recommend this site because I think they have some good material but I have only been able to download about 6 videos and I can't be bothered to wait the all the hours it would require to scroll through their content.
I've emailed them to see what's happening so if I get a reply then I will amend this review but for now. I'd stay away from the site. |
|
10-11-09 10:01am
Replies (10)
|
Review
186
|
Gapes In POV
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-All models in their teens to early 20's
-Navigation is easy within the site & network.
-Video can be streamed or downloaded.
-Downloads are in wmv with either regular 640x480
resolution and 1280x720 for hi-def.
-The sex is pretty intense and leans toward the nasty/extreme of the scale. |
| Cons: |
-This is another one of those sites belonging to the "No rest for the ass" network and like the others ot does not allow for more than one download at a time.
-The sex in this site like in most of the other in the network is rather nasty so not really meant for those with a preference for the romantic type of intercourse.
-The average download speed for a regular version video is 20-30 minutes and double that for the hi-def ones
-They do not update based on any visible schedule so no way of knowing exactly when the next scene will appear.
-They only have 25 scenes which breaks down to alittle more than one scene per months since they started this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good adder to the network but many of the girls here appear in some of the other sites and therefore the scenes is somewhat redundent and repetitive.
Of course they still have a few that are only one this site at the moment so it's still nice to have access.
This site would not be worth bothering with if it weren't for the network access. My score is in part because of the network access.
I would rather the owners dropped half of the sites (including this one) and concentrated more updates for the rest of the sites. A proper schedule for the updates would be a nice option for guest and members. |
|
07-03-09 06:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
187
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-2 day full access trial for under 5$.
-Access to 19 sites.
-Downloads are really fast
-Quality of vids is pretty good
-Some of the content is really original(see Ass Smoothie).
-They have pics and videos.
-Access to its different sites is made real easy from the main one. Does not require the user to identify himself each time. |
| Cons: |
-Only 1/3 is exclusive. The rest is mostly, if not all, scenes taken from different dvds.
-There is no zip files for the pics.
-The most original site for this network is "Ass
Smoothie", and eventhough they advertise over 40 stars. In fact only 27 of them actually do the deed. The other are only interviewed on the
subject.
-There is no date on the material so now way to judge most of the material. |
| Bottom Line: |
I gave this network a higher rating only because of the low cost full access trial. Let me tell you that 2 days is one day more than you'll need to download the full content of the network. The exclusive content is either solo or mostly lesbian sex. The girls are young and good looking. Their scenes are pretty hot with anal sex being the main theme. I have no problem recommending this network as long as they keep their full access trial at this low price. |
|
02-10-08 08:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
188
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The price for a 5 day trial is amazing, and you get to see a lot. There is enough to satisfy your average Playboy fan. The quality of the pictures is excellent. Navigation is made easy. |
| Cons: |
This may just be me, but I don't want to have to call to cancel my membership. If I join online, I should be able to cancel online, but not with Playboy plus. You have to call an 800 number to cancel your membership. Although you do get access to some magazine. they only go back a few years. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because I wanted access to their archive of magazines, but since they only had a few, I was really disapointed. Then the method for cancelling membership gave me a really bad taste. The trial price of 2.95$ for 5 days is unbeatable. |
|
10-27-07 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
189
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
They have many episodes to download, and for the most part they come in both video and photo. The sex is fairly on the rough side. These include oral, vaginal, anal, fisting and DP. Most if not all the episode end with cum on the face or head. You get access to 4 other sites.(similar theme). The girls for the most part are unknowns. |
| Cons: |
I have high speed cable, and downloads were slow.
some of the older episodes aren't very good. The designated studs leave a lot to be desired. I wouldn't say the girls are ugly, but I wouldn't describe them as pretty or cute. Updates come slowly. Quality of episode is inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an average kind of site. Some of the episodes were quite good, but many weren't. With a sign up price of 19.95, they are bordeline on whether you want to give it a try. Your best bet is to visit the site and read the episode, watch the trailers. A lower sign up cost might make it more appealing. |
|
02-11-07 10:44am
Replies (2)
|
Review
190
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have an excellent selection of models.
+You get access to 30 extra sites.
+You can download the videos in multiple formats like MP4, FLV, MKV and WMV.
+Video resolution is offered in low, medium and high quality (medium resolution is 860x480).
+You can download photosets as a complete zip file and pic resolution is 960x1440. |
| Cons: |
-A part of their content is recycled videos from some of their other sites.
-The bulk of the performers on this site already have very similar scenes on the other sites.
-There are only 19 videos at the moment.
-They opened the site in November and they were doing an update every few days and then they stopped updating from early December until early February. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This may be a very good addition to the teen mega world network one day but the owners have to stop using scenes from their other sites as new updates. I can understand if they created this site to regroup all their POV style videos under one banner but they have to be careful and update with a mixture of new scenes as well as recyled scenes and they certainly can't skip updating a brand new site for 2 months.
**Since the site is still quite small and that some of the content isn't really new then I'd recommend that anyone looking to join because of their videos wait a few months. Anyone looking for this type of porn but more the content from the main network will get more than his moneys worth.**
**I gave them a smaller score than I would have if I was including the the content from the entire network**. |
|
02-27-12 11:34am
Replies (4)
|
Review
191
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have some of the only anal scenes from non anal performers.
-They have an excellent selection of models.
-They update with one new scene per week.
-Most videos can be downloaded in WMV or Mpg.
-You can use a download manager.
-More than 200 videos. |
| Cons: |
-No models info to be found on the site. You can usually see the performers first name on the preview pages but that info is not available on the members page.
-They don't date their videos so although they have started to update again. You can't trust the date on the preview pages.
-The pics are to be used as a reference for the action in the video. They can't be downloaded as a complete file but then again you wouldn't want to anyway.
-They don't have any navigation tools except the page buttons.
-The theme in many of the videos is coercion and punishment so that might not appeal to everyone.
-Camera angles could sometime be better.
-Not every performer knows how to properlly use a strapon so that removes heat from the scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I'm a returning member and although they have done some slight changes in regards to the style of action they shoot. They still screw up the important stuff to the point where it's hard to give the site a good review. They hire some beautiful women to do lesbian and anal strapon sex but then the scenes often lack passion. Too many of the scenes still use coercion/punishemnt and that was always one of my dislike of past scenes. |
|
04-21-11 07:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
192
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They have a very good navigation system that allows you to search by model name or selecting from 39 ndifferent paramers like sexual fetish, body type and hair color.
-They currently have over 700 videos.
-Newer videos can be dowloanded in low, medium and high quality.(medium quality is 720x408)
-They have over 500 photosets.
-They are still updating with new content every 2 days or so. |
| Cons: |
-Only 290 of the videos are single files. Any video prior to december 2008 is broken into 6 or more clips.
-Content appears to be exclusive but it is so similar to other sites like Seventeen, pack of porn and a slew of other sites that it's hard to tell if you don't already have a similar scene from one of those sites. Add the fact that they use the same models on these sites.
-The cost is way too high for what you get.
-The quality of the photosets are very good but there aren't that many pictures in each of them. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is one of those sites that although I have visited from time to time and often wished I could join. I would never have joined because of their join price. The only reason I'm able to do a review is because I got a special offer that gives me access a bunch of sites belogning to the parent company for a insignificant amount.
-This would be a pretty decent site if you could get access to it through some kind of network offer like teen mega world. There are some good videos to be found inside. It's too bad that more than half of them are in multiple clips. That really hurts them.
-If you like the content found at Seventeen and pack of porn then you should like this site. |
|
04-09-11 07:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
193
|
Torbe Network
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-About 800 videos.
-Some exclusive content.
-You can download most videos in 4 format which include Quicktime, ipod/psp, wmv and mpg4.
-You can use a download manager.
-You can download some of the picture sets as a complte file.
-The videos are all dated.
-There is an option to search using the models name. |
| Cons: |
-Large part of the content appears to be leased and the quality is from good to poor.
-The camera work in many of the videos is not very good and the cameraman tends to zoom on the penetration for too long.
-Certain scenes have only video and no pic sets while others have only pics and no video.
-The language used in many of the videos is not English.
-Many of the videos have a strong amateurish feel to them.
-Most of the leased content little to no model info.
-Synopsis of the action in the videos is often incorrect. |
| Bottom Line: |
I haven't been lucky with my memberhsip of late beause this is another network that has really disapointed me. I thought that I could find some goo videos but out of about 800 or so videos. I have downloaded about 12 and all will be deleted from my computer. There are still quite a few videos that llok good but they don't appeal to me.
This network might appeal more to someone who's just starting to surf for porn and likes the amateur/newbie style of porn. I'd avise most older porn surfer to avoid because of the leased content. You don't want to join this site only to find out you have many of the videos. |
|
12-20-10 07:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
194
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+The sex scenes are rather well done for an amateur site and there is a decent amount of hardcore sex.
+Jackie is a hot looking older woman. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is a mess because you are never too sure where to go to find something.
-Many of the videos are in more than one file.
-Video resolution is 640x 480 at best and it's not that unusual to see some 320 x 240.
-Content is not dated so no way to be sure when it was done but the site appears to be more or less dead now.
-There isn't much here. I counted less than 60 videos.
-It take at least 20 minutes to download a single video file. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm a returning member to this site and very little has changed. That's neither good nor is it bad. It looks the same and the content is in the same location. I even found some videos that I don't remember from my last time but I'm hard pressed to say if that's because they are new or because I didn't see them the last time I was here. Her appearance changes from one video to the next but I think that has more to do with the way they are set up on their different pages rather than because of any chronological order.
*This is an amateur site that a husband and wife started over a decade ago and I guess they get enough members to keep it alive. Not sure if Jackie still does porn but I doubt it. Mind you my score is not that high but I'm not too disappointed in my membership. My only real disapointment is that I wish Jackie was still doing porn because she is(or was) quite good at it.
*I suspect that if you don't care too much about video resolution, large libraries of content and professionally shot porn then you might be happy with this site. Otherwise stay away because you definitely won't be.
**I kept my old score because there is still some decent stuff here.** |
|
06-22-13 06:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
195
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me. |
|
08-06-11 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
196
|
Shy Angela
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Angela is such an amazingly cute teen model.
-This is probably the only place where you can find her on the net. At least I certainly have never seen her anywhere else.
-She may look young and innocent but she has no problem with having some pretty intense sex with boys. (she has only two lez scene at the moment)
-The site offers some really impressive options for video download: WMV 640x360 (2000 kbps), WMV 1280x720(6000kbps), FLV 640x360 (1300 kbps), FLV 640x360(2500kbps), iphone3G 640x360(1500kbps), ipod 320x180 (512kbps) and H.264 1280x720 (8000 kbps).
-You can download the phototsets as complete zip files. Resolution is 1600x1067.
-You can view photosets online and they offer them in 4 resolutions: 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768
and the standard 1600x1067. The majority of the photosets have over 120 pics per set and some have over 200. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest problem with the site is that it`s tiny with only 23 videos and 24 photosets.
-Another problem is that 14 of the scenes are solo in nature and mostly midcore.
-Updates are also a problem because they don`t have a set date and they don`t come very often. TBP says the site was launched in October 2010 and they had 9 videos and photosets at that time. that means only 15 updates since October of 2010.
-Normally I don`t use price as a con but 29.95$ is way too expensive for what is available at the moment. It`s hard to tell if and when it might be worth it because their update schedule is uncertain. 15 updates in 9 months is not a good track record.
-They have a bonus section where you can view or download scenes from many dvd's but it's all leased content that can be found elsewhere. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Shy Angela was an impulse join for me. I saw her site`s banner on another site and I just hasd to join. I had high hope that it would be better than what I finally got but that`s what happens when you choose a site based on impulse.
-I think the site has potential even as a stand alone but it will require a significantly larger amount of content before it gets there. I know there is more to be released because there is a B/B/G picture on the preview page and that's not part of the current updates.
-If you think she's too beautiful to past up and don't mind paying 30$ to see her now then go ahead. Otherwise I would recommend waiting at least until the end of this year or beginning of next year to join. hopefully by then she will have more content. |
|
07-14-11 07:15am
Replies (6)
|
Review
197
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-Jackie is an attractive all natural over 40yold woman who really enjoys having sex with mostly black men.
-They appear to still be updating with new content
-They have a forum where Jackie and/or Jason her husband answer their members.
-Over 60 videos
-They use CCbill as a CC processor.
-Videos are all shot by another person so none of that POV or one camera crap. |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds are not very good at about 228Kb.
-The content is not dated so no way of knowing when the videos were filmed.
-There aren't many photosets and none of them are Hi-Res.
-There are about 60 videos but only 26 of these are in one file |
| Bottom Line: |
-I was rather surprised with what I found on the site mostly because these stand alone amateur sites more often miss than hit the target. It's true that there isn't a lot of content compared to other sites and a lot of it is a couple of years old but I was still able to find about 6-7 videos that are keepers.
-All the videos are shot by another person who's probably her husband Jason and he's not bad as a cameraman. The camera doesn't linger on only one angle and you don't have to suffer through POV only shots.
-If you like enthusiastic middle age women who like to have sex with strangers on camera then you might find somthing here. Anyone looking for teen girls should avoid. |
|
06-07-11 08:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
198
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics. |
| Cons: |
-They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below) |
| Bottom Line: |
(cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.
Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.
*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.
*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.
**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.** |
|
06-30-13 11:18am
Replies (3)
|
Review
199
|
60 Plus MILFs
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.
*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.
*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.
**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.** |
|
12-27-12 06:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
200
|
Jizz On Teens
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content appears to be all exclusif.
+You get access to 3 other sites.
+They have a very nice selection of teen models.
+You can stream videos online.
+They offer multiple download options for their videos which include ipod/PSP and go all the way to HD at 1080P.
+You can download the photosets in a single zip file.
+The content is all dated and they are still updating. |
| Cons: |
-The site is tiny with only 20 scenes and since they only update about twice a month then it's going to take along time to accumulate a decent amount of content.
-Their idea of High quality picscs is 720x480 so not remotely close to HQ.
-Each video includes two girls with one guy so this may not appeal to people looking for some one-on-one.
-There are no search options and most of the performers are given a different name than the one they are more commonly known under. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I don't know if this site can appeal to anyone other than people who are really into oral sex because each video is basically two girls giving a guy a BJ for over half an hour. There is some lesbian action between the girls like kissing, breast play and some pussy licking but that is a small part of the video. There's no sex between the guy and the girls.
*Some of the videos are nearly an hour long and that seems to be on the long side of things. The videos are all well shot and well lighted so no complaints in that department but I don't know how many people will want to sit through a half hour BJ scene and since some of the videos are nearly an hour long then that is an even longer BJ scene.
*The bulk of the girls appearing on this site have at least one scene available on a site in the network and they also do BJ on that video so you are only getting a longer BJ scene here and the added girl to the mix.
*I got access to the site with my first anal quest membership and although this type of content does very little for me. I thought I should at least add a review since there are currently none available and maybe there are some people who might be interested.
*This would not be a good stand alone site but if you are into this type of fetish and really like anal as well then you should be happy with it. If you aren't into long BJ scenes and don't like anal then avoid the entire network because that is the bulk of their content.
*I'm boosting my score a little since you get access to some great sites with your membership. |
|
07-09-12 06:02pm
Replies (0)
|
