| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They update with a new scene once a week.
-Membership includes access to 7 other sites.
-Interesting mix of amateur/newcomers and well established performers.
-Movies can be streamed in flash.
-You can download the movies in various fomats which include wmv, quicktime, ipod/iphone & mpg.
-They offer hi-def in 1280x720, 1440x1080 or 192x1080 for movies made from 2007 and after.
-You can download about 4 scenes at a time without a download manager(avg time is 15min).
-You can download the pic sets in zip format. |
| Cons: |
-The senes have a fairly strong mysoginistic feel to them. You don't get a sense that they are trying to film a girl that enjoys this kind of sex as much as survives it. I guess it makes sense to call the site facial abuse but they could have called it pornstar abuse and it would have been just, if not more appropriate.
-If there is one site that feels like a graduate of the Max Hardcore school of pornography then this is the one. If you've seen what passes for porn in any of the movies Max made in the last few years then you will know what you'll get with this site.
-The pics are stills from the movies.
-Except for nasty little facials. All the other sites are either no longer updating or it appears to be leased content. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm still wondering why I join this site again.
I didn't particularly enjoy it the first time and I think it's gotten worse or at least worse for me. I think the latest offer of 19.95$ and the fact that they had a couple of cuties may have blinded me to the awful fact that I really disliked Max style of choking, drooling, vomiting BJ and most of their updates now contain some if not all of these things.
These guys could easily take Max's place and except for the fact that Max would not be in the scene. No one would tell the difference. So if you saw any of the movies that Max made in the last few years and really liked that style then you will be thrilled by this site.
Anyone who did not enjoy Max's stuff should stay very far away or you will regret it.
I'm actually suprised by the number of fairly well known performers they've been able to get seeing as this is not the stuff you'd expect to see them do.
I debated what score I should give them because although I did not enjoy most of the content. The site is technically pretty well done and is sure to satisfy people that enjoy this type of porn. Not to mention that I found a couple of scenes in the other sites that had the same performer as facial abuse but the scene was more what I enjoy. |
|
07-24-10 11:57am
Replies (16)
|
Review
152
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to the Evil Angel network.
-Special price of 20$ through TBP/PU.
-Large library of material(based on newtwork).
-Early access to scenes from just released dvd's.
-Some exclusive material.(based on network).
-Good Dowload speed.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in WMV and some in Quicktime as well.
-The videos all come in at least medium or high
quality. |
| Cons: |
-The navigation speed within the network is quite bad. Clicking on an icon and waiting 10 seconds or more for a response is quite common.
-The search engine is a mess. Good luck trying to find a specific scene or actress.
-This is mostly non-exclusive material. This is more important for members of videobox that also took the EA option. |
| Bottom Line: |
-In many ways the network feels more like an EA promotional tool than an actual stand alone site.
It makes sense since EA is possibly the top porn studio at the moment and having a site that showcases some of their material is sure to attract more buyers to their dvd's.
-The network has potential and if one day they decide to improve it then I would recommend it.
The way it stands at this moment. I would stay away. The satisfaction you may get is not worth the frustration you are sure to receive.
-I think EA should decide if they need or want a stand alone network or simply make their entire library available to sites like Videobox. It's less profitable through Videobox, but you get far more traffic.
-I debated what score to give them. I love most of EA's stuff and any site gives me acces to their content is great. That would be worth a high 90 score, but the navigation speed kills it for me. I don't have the patience needed to find what I want. |
|
11-01-09 08:53am
Replies (2)
|
Review
153
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Lady Sonia is an extremely beautiful older woman.
+You can stream or download all her videos.
+Videos are in the preferable MP4 format.
+Lady Sonias has started to add new content. |
| Cons: |
-The site design could be improved in key areas and for that reason finding content is made much harder.
-No way of knowing how many videos have been removed and no easy way to count the total number as well. I'd say at least over 300.
-A lot of the content is solo stuff that's mostly softcore to midcore.
-She does shoot with a black male but he wears a stupid mask so that removes a lot of the heat that would have been there otherwise.
-Content is dated but it's clear that some older stuff has been given a more recent date and it's also clear that the order of videos is not based on when it was made or originally uploaded.
-I can't help but feel that the site is now there more for her to book private meetings than to actually shoot porn for the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've been aware of Lady Sonia for many years and although I find her very attractive. The content she offers doesn't do anything for me. There are glimpses that look interesting but the execution and final product is somewhat lacking to me. I know she stopped shooting porn but I read that she was at it again and I was curious to know if her new stuff would be like.
*Sadly for me there is very little that was different from past content and therefore not any more enjoyable than her past stuff. I find that a lot of her content gets repetitive rather quickly so buyers beware. You have to be into seeing an older woman play with herself more than seeing her with different partners. There is a certain level of teasing and cuckoldry in many of her videos which is something that may not appeal to everyone.
*I had an offer to join for about 13$ and I took it to satisfy my curiosity. I won't need to join again as I downloaded maybe half a dozen videos which will all wind up in my garbage bin.
**I know that she advertises private meetings for people in the UK and it's a recurring theme in her tweets. To the point where that's basically all they are. That's why I felt like the site is more like advertising for that business than an actual porn site where the model shoots exclusively for it.*** |
|
10-26-14 01:01pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
154
|
Lily Cade
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusive (with reserve).
+Videos can now be downloaded as well as streamed online.
+There are 114 videos with one new video added each week and it's all dated.
+Lily has a blog where she post info about once a month on stuff she did or is about to do. |
| Cons: |
-Video resolution is only 480x272 and they all looked a little grainy.
-There are photos but I wasn't able to open them. They appear to be pics taken from the videos.
-The content is exclusive but only if you want to download them because they can be found on dvd or streaming sites.
-Site is a little slow to surf. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I have been aware of Lily as a performer and a director for a couple of years now. She is a lesbian only girl so don't expect to ever see her with a guy. She seems to be a very popular girl with many performers and she does have a great talent for acting and directing.
*The scenes she directs or stars in tend to be very good and they can get a little nasty but almost never extreme.
*The biggest con against this site is that the videos are a little too grainy for me which is too bad because there are some great ones here. The good news is that this was once a streaming only site so at least we can now download the videos.
*The other advantage is that since there are no other download sites with this content then it's either paying for each dvd or paying to sream them on sites like AEBN and Hot Movies.
*There are pics but I wasn't able to see or download them so I can't speak for quality but I do know that there are no zip files for these so you'd have to download each pic one by one.
**I think this isn't a bad site per say and it's only 20$ so even if you don't wind up downloading anything then you at least get a very good idea the kind of porn Lily stars and directs and this can help you save or spend on movies you were thinking about. |
|
09-02-13 09:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much. |
| Cons: |
-Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.
*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.
*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.
**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.
**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site |
|
03-03-13 09:15am
Replies (6)
|
Review
156
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway. |
|
12-27-12 08:14am
Replies (4)
|
Review
157
|
18 Virgin Sex
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 28 sites.
+Content is dated and the update with 2 new scene each month.
+Their selection of performers is excellent and includes many of the popular European models.
+They have 226 videos that you can download them in WMV and resolution is a decent 832x464
+The videos each have their accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. The pic resolution is 1200x800.
+Most of the performers have a tleast one scene on the other sites of the network. |
| Cons: |
-There's a synopsis for each scene but the info is not very accurate and that's annoying because they don't assign any tags on their scene to do a search.
-They don't have a real search option except using the performers name or the name of a site.
-I can't tell just how much of the content is leased but the the bulk of the updates after 2009 are mostly all leased.
-This site suffers from the renaming syndrome so most of the performers on this site aren't under the name they are normally know by.
-Only 6 of the actual sites in the network are still updating. All the others stopped updating in 2009 or before.
-There is a pretty large amount of leased material within the entire network with only some sites having all exclusif content.
-You can only download the videos in WMV and less than a dozen of these are in HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is one of the better sites in the network and the second one with the most content. The videos are all pretty well shot and the action is also very good. There is a wide selction of young European performers and they all look lovely. My biggest annoyance is that since they don't have a proper scene breakdown in the synopsis and they don't have any tags then you either download the entire network or you do like me and check part of the content for each video to see if it's worth downloading.
*I think anyone that likes to watch young Eastern European women have sex on video should be statified with the content. There isn't enough content hear to justify the join price unless you plan on downloading content from some of the content on the other sites.
**Some of the people that should be nervous about joining this site are those that have been members of teen mega world, 18x girls and smack my bitch because I'm pretty sure that some of their leased content is on this site.** |
|
05-17-12 11:26am
Replies (2)
|
Review
158
|
My Sex Life
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites. |
| Cons: |
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it. |
|
08-05-11 07:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 500 videos and pic sets to choose from.
-Most videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and Quicktime. They offer standard resolution at 720x405 and HD at 1280x720
-You can stream videos in Flash.
-Pics sets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set.
-There is a wide selection of models to choose from.
-They have some nice fetishes to choose from like watersports, spanking, latex, bondage to name a few.
-A good selection of models. Most of them being Eastern Europeans porn performers |
| Cons: |
-They don't update very often and it's difficult to tell what is and isn't new content since they don't date any of it.(except on the preview page)
-Some of their scenes are split in 2 or more sections and these aren't updated at the same time but over a certain number of weeks.
-Some of the updates are older scenes that have been given a facelift and now come in better video resolution.
-They update with some leased content.
-Some of the content appears to be from some of their other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is another site under the ddf network and one that lives more on it's connection to that network rather than it's own merit. It would not have gotten as high a score if it weren't for the automatic access to the network.
-This one suffers from some of the same issues that plague Handsonhardcore. They don't update regularly. Their updates aren't necessarily new scenes as much as re-issued older ones. They now have leased content and also use content from some of their other sites. Add the fact that they don't date their material and this makes it hard to know what is and isn't new material.
-I guess this site still has some good stuff to offer but mostly for new porn surfer. Older memebers will probably feel more cheated than satisfied. |
|
01-07-11 07:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
160
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Membership gives you access to 14 other sites.
-Download speed is quite good using I.E and no dowmload manager.
-They have over 1000 videos in the network.
-The sex is all interracial going from mild to intense.
-There are quite a few videos with a little scenarios which adds to the fantasy aspect.
-A good choice of models with a greater emphasis on milf.
-Blacks on Blonde appears to still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-Blacks on blondes and Glory Hole seem to be the only 2 sites still releasing new content. It's difficult to tell because although they give you the release dates on the sites. I don't believe that they are accurate.
-The quality from site to site or from older to newer material is of varying quality.
-The more recent videos can be downloaded whole or in 3 parts but quite alot of the older material on the other sites is in multiple parts.
-Some of the sites do not have the option of downloading the complete set in one file. |
| Bottom Line: |
The main reason why I joined was because you got access to Spring Thomas and Katie Thomas with the membership. I've had my eye on the 3 sites for a long time. I wouldn't have joined them individually but in a package it was difficult to pass up.
I think this a very good join, download all the content you want and then don't comeback for a long time. I'm pretty sure Spring and Katie are no longer updating and most of the other sites are variations of black on blondes.
If you like IR, gangbang, milf, cum swallowing style of sex than you should give these guys a try. |
|
09-27-09 09:30am
Replies (2)
|
Review
161
|
Giorgio Grandi
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-All the models are in their teens to early 20's.
-The sex is nasty and the theme is anal.
-video can be streamed or downloaded.
-Downloads videos are wmv and either 640x480 for the regular version and 1280x720 for the hi-def.
-Although a European site the language used in the dialogue is English. |
| Cons: |
-This is another one of the sites that belongs to the "No rest for the ass" network and like the others only allow you one download at a time.
-Download speed is pretty bad at 20-30 minutes for the regular version and 50-60 minutes for the hi-def one.
-If you aren't into anal sex then avoid this site and the network since that is the main theme throught most of the network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I may be wrong but I think this is the newest addition to the network since the scenes only go as far back as January of this year.
I enjoyed the content but I wouldn't mind if the owner dropped the concept of 9 sites and instead focused on maybe half that amount. Afterall The content is very similar accross the network with only: dildo and fisting, Eurolesbo gilrs and Gags girls being different.
In return I would like to see more updates and all of them on a specific shedule as oppose to their current system which I haven't figured out.
I based my score in part because you get access to the network. |
|
07-03-09 07:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
162
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A network of 28 sites.
+You can access all the sites from the main page.
+They update with about 12 new scenes per month which are broken among their 6 active sites.
+Over 2600 scenes to choose from.
+The vast majority of the scenes have an both a video and photoset.
+Videos are in WMV and most of them are in a single WMV file.
+All photosets can be downloaded in a single zip file. Resolution is 1200x800 for most of these.
+All content is dated and they show upcoming updates. |
| Cons: |
-21 of the sites are no longer updating and the other six don't update on a weekly basis.
-It is hard to tell how much of the content is leased but there appears to be a significant amount that is.
-Most of the videos are not in HD and full downloads are only available in WMV.
-A percentage of the older videos are split in multiple video files.
-Many of the sites content could be under one banner since the content is the same as other sites.
-Scenes have no tags so no way of doing a search using tag words.
-There is no real search system since you can only look under the performer's name or the site itself.
-Most of the performers are not known under the name they are given on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has a lot of content and I don't know if it matters that a percentage of it is leased because it's stuff you might not have anyway. The bigger issue is that a lot of this content is getting old because 2 of the sites stopped updating in 2010-2011, 4 sites stopped in 2009 and 15 stopped in 2007-2008. That only leaves 7 sites still active and these update with only 2-3 scenes per month.
*I have posted a review of almost all of their active sites and these are only about a year old. I know that others have reviewed some of their sites so I'm instead posting info on some of the other sites that aren't active anymore or those that don't have or deserve a full review.
**They've added a new anal themed site called young anal tryouts but it only has 34 scenes and a percentage of these are leased. That wouldn't be so bad but some of the exclusif scenes are shot using a tripod so you get shots from the same angle and no zooming or paning during the scene. The girls are really cute but I would never join this network for their scenes because you can either get them elsewhere or they suck.
**You will notice that TBP doesn't post one of their sites called horny thief tales. I don't know why but I can guess so I will simply say that they have 46 scenes, it's exclusif content and they are still updating with about 2 scenes per month. I've never actually downloaded any of their scenes so couldn't do an honest review anyway
**young porn home videos is a site where I know that some of the content is leased because I recognize the scene. They have 84 scenes and the quality in most of them is bad to awfull. Most of the videos have an amateur feel to them with tripod only shots, night-vision cameras, bad lighting, fuzzy shots and so on.
**young lesbian porn appears to be all leased content with 69 scenes to choose from. The scenes are next to impossible to review because the content is too ecletic, quality varies a lot and only 15 of the scenes have an accompanying video.
**drilled mouths is appears to be an oral sex themed site with 46 scenes but where a large percentage of the girls also have sex with the guy so why call the sites makes no sense. Content appear to be partiallt leased and qulaity varies from scene to scene.
**creampied sweeties is exactly what it sounds like. They have 40 scenes, some of them are probably leased and quality varies.
**They have many other sites that could probably have been under one of two different site names but the recuring theme among all of them is that they are no longer updating, a lot of leased material, quality of the content varies a lot and most of the sites have very little content.
***I don't know if anyone should join the network for any of these sites because you might already have the content and even if you don't then you might not want it anyway. You should join the network for the active sites and use these as a bonus instead.***
My score is for the entire network and not based on these sites. |
|
05-22-12 08:30am
Replies (4)
|
Review
163
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
03-15-12 07:07pm (Update History)
Reason: I completely screwed up my reviews because this is for backroom casting couch. and not exploited college girl
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+The majority of the models are amateurs and this is one of the only places where you'll see them do porn. (although a few of them have had porn careers after this)
+There are some truly good looking models and there is also a good variety.
+They update with one new video a week.
+All updates are dated.
+Videos can be downloaded a sa complete file or you can download certain sections. |
| Cons: |
-The shooting style is very similar to backroom casting couch so it's all handheld POV, on a tripod or on the bed.
-Because the performer doesn't want his face to be seen then all the shots either avoid shooting above a certain height or his face his hidden.
-Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV but resolution is still only 640x360.
-The girls attempting anal tend to all be trying this for the first time so it's more often than not a fail or hard to watch because of pain. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I chose to join this site because you got access to backroom casting couch(see my next review). It's my second time here and it will be my last. The content still has potential but it can't overhsadow the unapealing ponr inside.
*The site is similar to backroom casting couch and girls do porn. It is superior to BCC but it is inferior to girl do porn. The problem is that the guy has to be in the videos so he has to be both cameraman and performer. I can see the appeal for any guy to want to have sex with these girls but that also means you mostly get handheld POV shots with less than steallar angles and that's when the camera isn't moving from left to right or being dep[osited on the bed to get a face shot.
*The one positive about this site vs back room casting couch is that the guy appears to want to make the girls happy and comfortable and that helps with the scene but not if anal is in it.
I only saw a couple of the girls appeared to be enjoying themselves during the anal. The bulk of the other videos are hard to watch or listen to because you can see and hear the gilrs in pain.
**If you like POV shot porn and you also like to see amateurs and can overlook the errors in the way the videos are shot then you might enjoy the site but be advised that it's 35$ and that is not a cheap amount to pay. It would be a lot easier to recommedn if it was in the 20$ to 25$ dollar range.** |
|
03-15-12 12:25pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
164
|
Alexis Golden
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Alexis is a an attractive 40yrs old woman with a very active sex life.
+There are 105 videos which can be downloaded in WMV(resolution is 640x480).
+You can stream the videos in the Windows player.
+You can stream past web cams shows.
+Sites updates with new content once a week. |
| Cons: |
-There are 105 videos but it's really only about 50 scenes since they've broken the scenes into 2 or more parts.
-Some of the videos is leased material.
-There are 144 phototsets but you can't download them as complete zip files and the quality of pics is average at best.
-Navigation on the site is limited to a couple of icons orand page numbers.
-There is a link to a VOD site with some of Alexis content which still has me scratching my head since you'd have to pay extra money to view the streaming content that you are getting with your membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Here is another solo model site that manages to fail because they do so many wrong things that they overshadow the good ones. The first thing a solo model site has to have is a personality. This is afterall the models site and it should reflect her in some way. It shouldn't just be a repository of pics and videos. The site should include stuff that can't be found elsewhere.
*If you are going to offer videos then make sure they are complete scenes and not in multiple parts of a bigger one. It's bad enough that the videos are only 640x480 but to have to download 2 or more parts to get the complete scene is more than a little annoying.
*To make a site seem more personal requires pics that are more than stills from the videos. They should include some glamour shoots and even some day to day stuff that isn't pornagraphic in nature. This helps members feel like they know you better. Of course once you talk pics than please make sure the quality, quantity and most importantly that you can download the phototsets as complete files.
**This isn't a terrible site except for anyone looking for pics but it is really disapointing.
If you want to see Alexis have hardcore sex and down't mind that the scenes are in parts than you should be satisfied. |
|
07-29-11 06:28pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
165
|
The Nympho
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Alanna is a rather cute 30+ yrs old blond woman with a penchant for swinging.
-There are more than 200 videos.
There are over 400 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies a lot from set to set so it's difficult. I can confirm that many of them are at least 1152x864.
-You get access to the TAC amateur and chickpass networks. |
| Cons: |
-Their updates are dated but those dates are not worth anything since the content found on it is often much older than the date posted. I found videos from 2007 that are dated 2011.
-Their navigation system is a little confusing. You can search for videos and photosets by different categories but if that scene includes interacial, anal, and a cumshot than it's going to be located in all of these locations. Members have to be carefull not to download the same content multiple times.
-Too many of the videos are broken into 2 or more parts and they aren't huge files.
-They claim that some of their videos have dvd quality but that false. They barely qualify for moderate qulaity. I found that many videos had below average quality.
-Some of their content are scenes from swinging parties that star other internet performers so its also available on their site as well as Alanna's. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Maybe my expectation are too high for these types of sites. I mean this is suppose to be an amateur site but then again can you really call yourself an amateur if you've been doing this for more than 5 years. I think that Alanna is a cute above 30 woman with a nice body that suits her age. If only the content on this site was as good as her than she would have something special.
-I found far too many videos that were filmed using a lower quality video camera and poor lighting so that most of the videos cannot be watched full screen and often the action is difficult to make out. Then you add a less than stellar camera guy and you get a video that's blurry, semi-dark, bad camera angles and the always pleasant swinging camera because we don't want to edit that from the video.
-I downloaded about half a dozen videos but I'll only keep about 2 of those. The rest aren't worth the hard disk space.
**The only reason I gave the site a higher score than my review seems to imply it deserves is in large part because of the bonus content and the join price is less than 20$.** |
|
07-04-11 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
Oldje
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-22-10 01:50pm (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
|
| Pros: |
-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.
I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some. |
|
11-22-10 08:51am
Replies (9)
|
Review
167
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Membership to one site gives you access to two other (sort of)
*You get access to 88 movies of which some are exclusive to this site.
+You can download videos in multiple resolution from basic all the way to 1280x720 HD.
+You can search using the model's name and keywords to narrow the results.
+You can view some screen caps of each video.
+It is easy to go from one site to the next. |
| Cons: |
-You don't really get acces to 2 other sites since one has all the content of the other.
-Download speeds are on the slow side of things. it took me about 8 minutes to download an 846 MB video.
-You only get acces to a little more than half of harmony's library and both Videobox and VideosZ have more movies than this site.
-You don't actually get all the scenes available in their movies.
-It's impossible to return to your previous page because the back button always brings you back to the main page.
-Too many of their pages are cluttered with advertising for their other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is now the third Stiffa owned site that I join and I'm starting to see a pattern and it goes something like this. You have a company who had some cash and was looking to get into the porn industry but wasn't looking to produce so they went to some dead or dying porn studios and bought part of their libraries. They then started a network of sites where you could join one and get bombarded with advertising for the other sites.
*This site could have been on par with their West Coast site because it has a little more going for it than some of their other sites but they don't have as many movies as VB and VideosZ and the way they update then it will take years to reach the same level as the other sites. Then there's the reality that Harmony studio is now more or less dead so the number of new movies is not going to get bigger in the years to come. The only thing they have going is that they offer HD content but how many people will want to join this site solely based on that.
*It doesn't help that this site is paired with another whose content is very different from it's own so you aren't likely to get as many people interested in both. When you couple that with slow download speeds and you get a mediocre site.
**Luckily for me I wanted content from both sites and I also got to join for 10$ as opposed to the TBP price.** |
|
02-10-14 08:51am
Replies (3)
|
Review
168
|
Kirtu
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif.
+There are 10 different comic series.
+The art work is decent and the dialogue is appropriate.
+All the comics have about 30 plus pages.
+All the comics can be viewed online or downloaded to you computer as a single file.
+There is a section informing members as to when new updates are coming. |
| Cons: |
-I found that there is a lack of imagination in the premise and dialogue for each comic.
-You aren't getting a lot of variety since many of the series tend to have a similar theme.
-There is too often a lack of build up in the plot for each comics and that could have made the comics so much better. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The bottom line is that we are essentially talking about indian porn comics with the underlying theme of a bored housewife or teenager willing to screw about anyone at any time for almost any reason.
*The art work is good but there could be some improvements but I doubt you'll see it as some of the series have more than 30 issues under their belt and I didn't see any major changes from one to the next.
*The plot within each series could use some more imagination but again I doubt you will see it for the same reason as I mentioneed before.
*I can't exactly complain a lot about this site because I got access for less than 3$ because I joined a similar site from the same parent company and this was a cross-sell from the other site. There is enough here to warrant spending less than 5$.
*If you're into adults porn comics and more importantly into Indian comics then this is the site for you. Do not buy anything more than a one month membership because it would be a waste of money. |
|
09-23-13 02:37pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
169
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gigantic library of videos.
-Good Interaction from Pierre in the forum.
-Some Exclusive material.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in WMV and H.264.
-The sites updates regularly. |
| Cons: |
-Downloads speeds aren't very fast. A 20 minute video may take from 20 to 45 minutes to download.
-You usually can only download 4 videos at the same time.
-The quality of the videos is hit and miss. The older content has not been remastered and it shows.
-THere is a very large watermark at the bottom of each video.
-Many of the videos are only interviews.
-A cost of 30 Euros makes it harder to justify for North Americans. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've seen many of Pierre's movies. I enjoy his style and he often gets girls to do stuff on camera that they have never done and may never do again. The majority of the content on this site is taken from interviews that he's done over the years. Some videos contain actual sex with Pierre but many are just the interviews.
Since a large part of the hardcore found on the site is of Pierre with a performer then you are stuck with a POV view taken from a single camera on tripod. I knew that going in so it wasn't a problem but for those who dodn't then you might want to reconsider.
My biggest disapointment with the site is that I was hoping for more exclusive material. As it stands you can find some his content on Videobox since they have a couple of Pierre's movies.
I can't see Pierre going for many more years without going all exclusive. How many people will be willing to remain long term members or even be a returning member when a large part of the library is of poor quality and available elsewhere? |
|
05-02-10 06:49pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
170
|
Holed
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is exclusive and they update with one new video each week.
+The videos can be streamed online(see cons).
+The videos can be downloaded in the MP4, MPG and WMV format with 480p being the lowest possible resolution but to get 1080P or 4K than you only the superior MP4 format.
+They have created photosets for each video which can be downloaded as a single zip file.(resolution is 1500x100)
+They managed to get the first anal of some performers.
+Their selection of models is top notch including most of the most popular new performers.
+You can download multiple videos at the same time but (see cons). |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds for videos with resolutions above 720p are quite slow(about 530KB/sec) which means that download time can be as long as 2hrs. Needless to say download of 4K videos is well above 2 hours. Of course downloading multiple videos at the same time will greatly increase download time for each video.
-I can't emphasize just how aggressive and also quite annoying they are with their cross-sell options(see bottom line).
-Site is still pretty small with less than 50 videos.
-Some of the models appear twice on the site.
-Most of the videos are in a POV format so that limits the possible shots.
-There is a lot of chocking sounds during the BJ part of the videos.
-Good luck trying to stream videos because it takes forever for the video to upload in their player and you can skip ahead until the video has uploaded beyond your skip to position. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I had high hope for this site because it's an anal themed site(something I really like) and they hire the most popular performers in the industry. Now if only they didn't manage to screw those two things up than we might have had a great site but as it stands it's not remotely close to being that. Let's begin with what I think is probably one of the most annoying thing I have seen and heard in video. They have a loud 10 seconds promo video for their other Holed videos at the beginning of each of their videos. I could see why you might want to do that if you were leasing your content to other sites but which member wants to see advertisement for other videos he already has access to and probably will download and watch later on?
*Then there is the cross-sell page when you first join the site, then the cross-sell banners at the top of the main page and the third party cross-sell at the bottom of each page. Let us not forget the various enticement to join their other sites that are the bottom of each page when you select a performers videos and they show you all the other videos you don't have access to.
*The one good thing they have going for them is that their choice of models is excellent but they don't seem to know what their shooting style should be so instead of being all similarily shot videos with a recurring anal theme what you get instead are anal videos where more often than not it's a sort of POV style video but other times it's s light BSDM, another it's sort of coy girl wants to try anal sex. Normally sites pick a style and stick with it but not these guys.
**The simple fact is that all of the performers who appear on this site wind up doing anal for other sites(including their sister sites) and their anal scenes are in my opinion better on those sites than they are on this site so unless you want the first on screen anal of a particular performer than you might want to skip this site. if you want to reward them for their hard work than check out some of their other sites where the content is actually better** |
|
04-24-17 07:09pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
171
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and it's a type of fetish that is not well represented on the net.
+They update with one new scene each week and content is dated.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in multiple formats like MP4, WMV and each video is offered in low, medium and high quality.
+You can download the photosets as a complete zip file.(resolution is 1400x810)
+You get access to all the teenmegaworld sites.
+They use the same models as TMW so you know they are all really cute teens.
+They have an excellent search engine and they tag their scenes so it's easier to find what you are looking for. |
| Cons: |
-The site is the latest addition to TMW and is still quite small with only 19 scenes.
-Their male performer(s) are probably over 50 so that could be an issue.
-The dialogue in the videos is only in Russian with no subtittles.
-Their cameraman tends to often shoot from the wrong angle and is too static with his shots.
-Don't join through the site because it's 30$ but instead through TMW.(you save 10$ that way). |
| Bottom Line: |
*One thing this site has going for it, is that there aren't many simialr sites on the net so competition is almost non-existant. That's the good news. The bad news is that it's dialogue driven scenario porn and being in a Foreing language makes it hard to know what's happening from the dialogue.
*All the scenes are pretty much identical with a young woman going to see a doctor for an exam. They talk for a few minutes then the doctor normally does a few simple examination and then the woman removes her clothes and gets on the dotor's examination table. This is followed by some touching, fingering and speculum play from the doctor before they have sex. I find it hard to judge if the acting is adequate or amateurish because I have no idea what is said between the performers. This makes it hard to know why the girl decides to blow the docor and have sex with him. The doctor's acting seems a little wooden but I don't know if he's playing that type of role or if he simply can't act.
*I like the general concept and their choice of male performer(s) and female performers is fine with me but the site would be significantly better if it was in English. Not understanding what is said makes it almost impossible to enjoy scenario driven porn.
*It's a new site so maybe they will add many different male performers. There are currently only two male performers and one is only in the most recent video. Both are over 50 so unless you enjoy watching an older man with a much younger woman than this won't really interest you. I hope they add subtitles because I can't see this site ever being popular to anyone who doesn't speak Russian. |
|
07-24-12 06:28am
Replies (6)
|
Review
172
|
Teen Anal Casting
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to most of teen core clubs sites
and for a lot less than that network's price.
+Their have a nice selection of models and some of these are rising Eastern European performers.
+The content is all exclusif.
+Their videos are all HD 1920x1080. |
| Cons: |
-The site has only 10 videos and is already dead because they haven't added a new one in weeks and none are planned in their update schedule.
-A few of this sites models do a simialr scene another one of their site.
-There is no real search option and navigation is basically choosing a particular page.
-They have pics but you have to download them one by one then so why bother?
-Only 4 of the other sites are still updating with new content on a regular basis and one of these has only leased content available on many other sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This would be an awful stand alone site but if you think of it as a bonus site then it's not bad at all. The girls are all cute. The sex is hot and well filmed. The only huge problem is that there are only 10 scenes and I don't think they'll be adding much ir anything to the site. I might have joined it in the futur if only for the try teens stuff but I got a sweet deal by email where I got access for 20$ so this was a no brainer for me.
*The fact that your membership gives you access to all of the teen core club sites that are still updating is a great deal even at 30$. About the only people that might want to get a TCC membership would be members that want access to some of their older sites not available with the teen anal casting membership.
*I sometime wonder why a network like TCC or 21sextury will add a site to it's line up when that site has only limited amount of content and will probably not have anymore updates. Why not incorporate those scenes in one of their active sites instead? I know that the shooting style for this site did not exactly match some of the other TCC sites but I would think that promoting what is essentialy a dead site would be a bad martketing idea.
**This is the type of site you only join if you want access to the content on the other sites. For that reason my score is much lower since I'm not really considering the other sites.** |
|
06-22-12 10:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
173
|
Spoiled Virgins
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 28 sites.
+They've got a very good selection of popular young European performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to update with 2-3 new scenes per month.
+You can download all the phototsets in a single zip file and resolution is 1200x800.
+Navigation from site to site is usually about two clicks of the mouse.
+You can see all of the videos a model has by looking at the bottom of her video page.
+Most of the models have at least one video on some of the other sites. |
| Cons: |
-You get 28 sites but only 6 of those are still updating. All of the others stopped updating 3 or more years ago.
-The performers name are not the ones they are normally known under.
-The use of HD isn't helping in the quality of the videos since you see all the skin blemishes, pimples and razor burns. |
| Bottom Line: |
*The setup of this site is that it tries to make the viewers believe that all the girls are true virgins and that this is their first sexual experience. They fail miserably at it because the acting is not very good, all of the girls are well known European performers and whenever they have a doctor to verify that the girl still has her hymen then he or she comes into the room already wearing a complete surgery outfit with a mask on their face. They currently have 215 videos(only about 12 are HD) so this makes it the second biggest site of the ones that are still updating.
*I think I saved about one or two videos from this site because the virgin gimmick doesn't do much for me. I might have a different idea if the dialogue was in English and the acting was a little better but I doubt it. The choice of models, the setup and everything else would have to be changed for me to get interested and this is not something these guys appear able to do.
*I guess that if you care more about the idea that the girls might be virgins and you can overlook bad acting and a mediocre setup then you might enjoy the content on this site. The others that might enjoy the site are those that want to collect all the content a certain model has done. If that's the case and you collect European models then you have to join this site.
**If the above do nothing for you then stay away from this site. You mnight find one of their other site more to your interest.** |
|
05-14-12 11:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
174
|
Lara's Playground
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+She's a tall red head with a nice all natural body who likes both women and men.
+You also get access to Jim Slip's site.
+Videos can be downloaded in wmv and they offer at least 720x408 and 1280x720 resolution.
+All pics are offered in 1200x900 or 2000x1343 resolution.
+You can search for specific shoots using certain keywords.
+She updates with one new scene each week. |
| Cons: |
-The site is tiny with only 10 videos or pic sets.
-All the photosets must be downloaded pic by pic and they all have to be renamed because they use the same name.
-All videos with lara prior to October 2009 are broken into 5 clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Lara says that she's Jim Slip's wife and that she is the one who's been behind the camera for years and she's decided to get in front of the camera. I don't know if she is Jim's wife but she is definetely the one who was behind the camera because she sometimes makes an appearance in some of Jim's past videos and you hear her voice from time to time.
*She is an excellent performer and brings a lot of heat to her performance whether with men or women. Her site has really only 10 new videos with her but because you get access to Jim' site as well then she actually has a total of 36 videos. it's just that the bulk of her videos can be accessed by joining only Jim's site.
**It's hard to recommend the site at this moment because of the tiny amount available and the cost. You can get access to just Jim's site for 19 Pounds and Lara and Jim together for 29 Pounds. If Lara keeps updating with new content then her site will be worth it within the next 4 months.** |
|
08-25-11 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Erin Daye
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 160 videos (Many videos can be downloaded as a complete file).
-Over 100 photosets (Many can be downloaded as a complete zip file.
-You get access to 13 other amateur sites.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-Content is not dated but since her last diary entry is in 2009 then you know the site stopped updating 2 yrs ago.
-There are over 160 videos but many of them are actually parts of a complete scene broken in 2 or more sections.
-Erin has quite a few tatoos and I'm not sure but she might also have implants.
-A lot of the content is similar so there isn't that much variation.
-The main male performer (probably her husband) has many tattoos on his body but the biggest problem is the one on his penis. He's in many videos and seeing that tattooed monstrosity in many of the penetration or Bj shots wa rteally annoying. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Erin is a pretty attactive dirty blond 30yrs old who loves creampies and getting tattoos. That last one becomes evident as you watch her later videos because her sleeve tattoo keeps getting bigger and other tattoos appear on her body.
-I find that Erin has the second best site after Susan Reno but that's in large part because Susan is willing to do more intense sex scenes than Erin and I'm not a huge fan of women with many or large tattoos.
-My score is in part because of the content you get from the other sites. |
|
03-27-11 08:37am
Replies (0)
|
