| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Access to 579 titles which I believe is close to the entire Wicked libray.
+Content is dated and they update with one new movie each week..
+All the videos can be streamed online.
+All the videos are offered in the mp4 for download with 640x480 resolution for all them, while over 200 of the most recent titles are now also offered with 720p resolution and the last 40+ titltes are also offered in 1080p.
+Unilke most sites like this. You can actually download the entire movie rather than just the scenes. Resolution is the same as the scenes.
+Each movie/scene has multiple tags attached to it and it's possible to search using tags words.
+You catch for free all the Wicked live shows.
+You have access to some bonus content live BTS and award show stuff.
+You also stream over 3000 pages of videos in the bonus section(see con).
+the TBP discount is sweet. |
| Cons: |
-I don't know if it's recent but the site often stopped working for no apparent reason which requiried me to log back in.
-Advertising tends to take about 1/5 of all the pages and it's a lot more on certain pages.
-Load times to stream videos is a little long sometime.
-You get access to some camgirls but the good stuff requires that you pay for it so is it really worth it?
-There are over 3000 pages of bonus videos that you can view online but the tags are all wrong, you always get an error message going from one page to the next and quality is not very good on most videos.
*-I'm putting this in the con only because some people are rabid about condoms so be warned that Wicked is a condom company going back a long time.* |
| Bottom Line: |
**Ihave been a fan of Wicked since the 90's so it's a little strange that I never thought of joining their site until now. I don't mind condoms and I prefer a story with my porn and this is basically what Wicked does. I suspect that they try to target more the couples market than the gonzo one but that doesn't mean that there isn't any heat in their scenes because there is. They also have a certain number of contract stars so if you are a fan of these ladies then you are almost obligated to join this site because most of them haven't done much except for work for Wicked.
**I was pleasantly surprised to see a studio site offer the majority of their library and even more so to see that you can actually download the entire movie and not just the individual sex scenes. I was happy to see that the video quality on the older title is quite decent. Resolution is only 640x480 but seeing as these movies were never filmed in HD then trying to convert into a higer resolution would probably be a really bad idea.
**My only major issue with the site is that it kept on stopping to work and you had to log back in and find the page you were on. The other one is in regards to the bonus videos. If you are going to bother and put some bonus videos then why not make sure the system works. Otherwise it's usueless filler that slows down the servers.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those looking for pure gonzo porn and those who can't watch porn that has condoms in it.*** |
|
09-30-12 10:32am
Replies (15)
|
Review
227
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is completely exclusive.
+Huge library of over 4000 videos to choose from.
+Has some of the only anal or dp videos of well known performers.
+You can stream all the videos directly online.
+All the videos can be donwloaded in the MP4 format and medium resolution is 960x540. You can also download multiple videos in the 1080pHD format as well.
+Over 360 4K videos.
+There is a very active forum where fans and members can interact with each other and with Pierre himself.
+The vast majority of performers appear to have multiple orgasm during their scene.
+All of the performers have an interview video that can include hardcore sex.
+For a small increase in the join price you also get access to Pierre's "wake up n fuck" site.
+Seems to add more North Americans to his site than in the past. |
| Cons: |
-Most of the videos are POV in nature so that limits the possible viewing angles.
-Pierre is usually the only male performer in the videos.(not a problem for me but worth mentioning).
-Something that many people complain about is that Pierre likes to hold on to some videos for months if not years so that although you know it exists. Better be very Patient because it will take longer than you want to see that video.
-Some of the content is many years old so video quality can be quite poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
**In my opinion there have only been two men who were able to get unknown women to do porn and they are Ed Powers and Pierre Woodman. Ed has long stopped doing it while Pierre is still going strong. Both men relied heavily on tripods and hand held cameras to shoot their porn because the women would have been uncomfortable with another person in the room. For that reason it tends to limit the kind of shots one can have but in return you can get content that few have managed to copy/emulate.
*Because Pierre is usually the only male in the scene than you have to be a fan otherwise the scene will not be worth watching. I am a huge fan because Pierre knows what he has to do to get the women to orgasm and in an era where gonzo is master and women fake it to such a level that it becomes comical. You still have places like here where it may or may not always be real but it always looks like it is.
*The biggest complaint people have toward Pierre is that he will tease his fans with a scene that you know exist because he will have shown a pic from the video but he will keep under wrap for years. Not sure why he does and frankly I don't care because while I might have to wait for that particular video to get released. I will get plenty of others that will be just as good while I wait.
*This may seem strange for some but I find that many of his interviews are somewhat bittersweet. The reason is that he has been doing this for such a long time that many of the women who first appeared in those interviews are now long gone from the industry and seeing them when they first started to the way they looked at the end is a little sad.
*I didn't put pricing in the cons because I think that site owners should charge what they want and in Pierre's case he more than deserves the price he asks for but be advised that his pricing is in Euro. |
|
03-06-17 06:44pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
228
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Gigantic library of videos.
-Good Interaction from Pierre in the forum.
-Some Exclusive material.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in WMV and H.264.
-The sites updates regularly. |
| Cons: |
-Downloads speeds aren't very fast. A 20 minute video may take from 20 to 45 minutes to download.
-You usually can only download 4 videos at the same time.
-The quality of the videos is hit and miss. The older content has not been remastered and it shows.
-THere is a very large watermark at the bottom of each video.
-Many of the videos are only interviews.
-A cost of 30 Euros makes it harder to justify for North Americans. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've seen many of Pierre's movies. I enjoy his style and he often gets girls to do stuff on camera that they have never done and may never do again. The majority of the content on this site is taken from interviews that he's done over the years. Some videos contain actual sex with Pierre but many are just the interviews.
Since a large part of the hardcore found on the site is of Pierre with a performer then you are stuck with a POV view taken from a single camera on tripod. I knew that going in so it wasn't a problem but for those who dodn't then you might want to reconsider.
My biggest disapointment with the site is that I was hoping for more exclusive material. As it stands you can find some his content on Videobox since they have a couple of Pierre's movies.
I can't see Pierre going for many more years without going all exclusive. How many people will be willing to remain long term members or even be a returning member when a large part of the library is of poor quality and available elsewhere? |
|
05-02-10 06:49pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
229
|
WTF Pass
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A network of 9 sites with nearly 1200 videos and photosets.
+They have an excellent selection of models to choose from.
+All the videos can be streamed online.
+All the Videos can be downloaded in WMV and MP4 and resolution for these two formats is at least 576p. The bulk of the videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in 720p.
+They offer smartphone, iphone, ipad and mac versions of their videos.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1600x1067 is common with scenes shot in 2009.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with a little over 15 new scenes per month. |
| Cons: |
-A large percentage of the recent updates is all leased content available on many other sites.
-Resolution for the bulk of the videos is very good but too many of the scenes are not well shot. where the camer is in the wrong place and lighting leaves a lot to be desired.
-A percentage of the updates are the same scene that is cut into multiple sections.
-About a 1/5 of the mains screen is taken up by offers to other sites.
-The network has tendency to use a different name then the one we know them under.
-Many of the models have multiple scenes that are split into the different sites and they often perform the same type of sex scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a pretty big network with a variety to chose from. I'm going to give more indept info on the different sites so that you get a better idea of what that site offers it's members.
*College Fuck Parties is sort of an orgy type of site where there are multiple partners having sex at the same time and the camera moves around a lot to keep track of the action. The scenes are normally shot in different rooms so this is one of the sites that updates with multiple sections. There are 79 parties and the site updates with a new ones every month. I can't recommend the site because I don't like orgy type porn because the camera has to keep moving to show as much of the action as possible or spend too long on just part of it. Of course if someo likes this type of porn then you should be quite happy with it.
*Pickup Fuck is basically a fake scenario style porn where we are meant to believe that these guys meet a girl on the street, in a café or a bar and after some some time she decides to have sex with one or two guys. The dialogue is all in Russian but they have subtitles. I like their selction of models but I really didn't particularly like their videos. Too many of the scenes are shot in tight spaces like bathroom stalls so camera angles are very limted and when you couple that with many of the shots being POV style then that simply adds to my displeasure, The lighting is also quite bad when they shoot those tight space scenes because they are using the rooms normal lighting. There is often music coming from the club or bar when they do those bathroom scenes. They have 171 scenes.
*Private Sex tapes is a hard one to describe. The girls are all professional porn performers so don't expect to see amateurs in this one but all the videos do have that amateur feel because they are shot by the girl, her real life boyfriend/husband or her sex partner for those scenes. Most couples have multiple scenes and it feels like these are filmed over a long period while the couple is on vacation. The quality of the videos is limited to the camera each couple used and the placd where they shot it. The overall feel is often amateurish because of that. The videos are POV or tripod since they are shot by the couple themselves. There are 40 couple and each has multiples scenes to chose from.
*Hard Fuck girls is well named because it includes the most intense type of porn the network offers. The main theme is forced gang bang sex normally with 3 or more guys. The choice of models is quite good and if you are into this type of fetish then you might enjoy the content. The little scenarios aren't the greatest and unless you speak Russian then you'll have to read the subtitles to know what they are saying. That's if you care. I did enjoy a couple of the videos but I think they use the same camera guy as pickup fuck because a lot of the shots aren't very good. Luckily they don't shoot in dark spaces so you get to see a lot more of the action. The site has only 3 updates this year and 12 in the last twelve months. That's a poor update shedule and when you consider that they only have 35 scenes total so you better be interested in more than this site before joining.
*Porn Weekends is a lot like private sex tapes but the couples are on vacation. The models are attractive and you can almost believe that they are on vacation with their boyfriend/husband. The site's last update was in September 2011 so 86 episode is all you are getting. Be advised that each couple has multiple scenes so all you are getting is the same girl and guy having sex in different locations.
*Dolls porn is all leased content that can be found on many other sites so you should not join for this site. This is the only site that offers only the video. I guess they didn't want to fork over the cash needed to buy the photosets to go along with the video.
*Public Sex is basically the same thing as pickup fucks but usually shot outdoor. The models are attractive and the content appears to be all exclusif. The bad news is that there are only 22 scenes to chose from and the last update was in February so the site is now dead.
*HD Masage Porn is standard b/g porn but here the scene starts with a guy giving the girl a massage. They have a good selection of models and the scenes are well shot. The bad news is that this site only has 21 scenes and the last one was in March so who knows whether they will add more. My gut feeling is no. If you are into this type of porn then it's a great bonus site but I again wouldn't join for just this one.
*Panda Fuck is the last site but you can search for my independant review of that one.
**The network used to be 35$ but I wouldn't have recommended it at that price but our join price is only 20$ so that is a pretty good deal. |
|
06-09-12 05:13pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
230
|
X-Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The scenes are very well shot with multplie camera angles and good lighting
+They appear to have all exclusive content(at least video wise).
+Over 530 videos and 550 photosets that can be downloaded.
+Videos can be downloaded in MP4 they offer a wide variety of video resolutions from 640x480 all the way to HD 1920x1080.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and they offer you 3 possible resolution(4000x2667 is the highest one)
+All content is dated and they appear to update with one new video or photosets once every day.
+Nearly 200 different models to choose from.
+Lots of kissing. |
| Cons: |
-Content may be a litle too glamorous for some.
-The videos are on the glamorous side of things but this is still gonzo porn with no premise, no dialogue and basically just sex.
-The lighting on a few of the videos leaves a lot to be desired.
-Their models are all teenagers and women in their early 20's so anyone looking for more mature performers will have to look elsewhere.
-Not all the models have accompanying videos and/or photosets.
-If anal is your thing then be advised that they only have 17 videos and they probably try not to shoot these type of scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I've been aware of this site for a couple of years but I kept putting off joining because I was afraid that I wouldn't enjoy their content. I can't say that I was wrong because I find that their content is mostly hit or miss for me.
*One of the reasons why I had reservation is that I had expectations that the content would appeal a lot more to me and they were unable to do that. Not their fault since I may not be the person this is meant for.
*Now the second reason is that these videos are for the most part gonzo porn with not many things to distinguish them from other gonzo videos. I know some will disagree but let me demonstrate what I mean.
1-There's no dialogue in these videos.
2-It's common for the performers to be naked or semi-naked at the very beginning of the scenes.
3-The girls give a BJ to a guy who already has a hard-on.
4-The videos show a variety of sexual positions but I couldn't help but feel that they are there so that the camera operator can show a different shots then a proper evolution of a real sex scene.
5-The last thing but the most important one to me is that it's common to see facials and a cum shot to the mouth.
*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos.
**Now the two important things that distinguish these scenes from other gonzo type videos is that the performers actually kiss multiple times in the scene and the guys orally service the women. It is actually common for them to do that prior to the women returning the favor on the guys. Just these two things elevate these gonzo style videos to a level that most gonzo studio never go and may make joining well worth it.
**Now I am giving this site a pretty high score which might look strange after I said so many negative things but there is no denying that the people responsible for this site strive to offer a very good product and even if I am not that satisfied myself. I do recognize that this may be more because of my personal taste then their efforts. |
|
01-07-14 11:39am
Replies (9)
|
Review
231
|
Young Busty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-Models all appear to have natural breast.
-Over 470 videos and 950 photosets.
-All videos can be dowloaded as a single file in either low, medium or high quality.
-Very good navigation system that allows search by models name, body type and a wide selection of other niches.
-They update with new content approximately every 2 days |
| Cons: |
-Not all the models have both video & photosets.
-Not all the scene are properlly tagged so that negates the very good search system.
-Not all the videos have accompanying photoset and vice versa not all the photosets have a video.
-Searching by models name is difficult at best because the names given to some of them are not the ones we know them by.
-It's very Difficult to say if all the content is exclusive but I know that some of it had to have been done for Seventeen because some of the models sometime have a tee-shirt with their logo on it. |
| Bottom Line: |
-The first thing you need to know is that the name of the site is a little misleading because not all the models are what I would consider busty but that should only be a problem if you like only large breasted women. That's not my case so I was quite pleased with the various cup size to be found inside.
-This site belong to the same people who own my sexy kitten but at least all the videos here are in a single file.
-I was pleasntly surpsied by how good the videos were and my only issue is that I wish they had all the videos to match the photosets because I much prefer video to photos. |
|
04-10-11 10:11am
Replies (6)
|
Review
232
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 9 sites for your first month and more get added the longer you keep your membership active.
+All content is dated and 6 of the sites appear to more or less still be updating.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+They have an amazing selection of Eastern Europeans models.
+There is a very good mix of pics and videos.
+Video resolution and pic resolution (see bottom line).
+The scenes are all well shot, well lit and there is some good action.
+The scenes are all tagged with multiple keywords which you can search for. |
| Cons: |
-My biggest con is that it's too common to have only a photoset and not the accompanying video for many scenes or vice versa.
-3 out the 9 sites are dead and have been for a few years and the content on some of the other has a release date but the actual production date is much older.
-A large part of the content on two of the sites is leased and available on many other sites.
-No way to search for a specific model's content across all the Diesel sites.
-There is a lot of repetition from site to site where you aren't getting much more than a variation on theme and I think some of the same scenes appear on more than one site. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This was a tough review for me because there was so little that I downloaded that I was not sure if I could be impartial in my review but I think that I did a decent job.
*The first thing people need to know is that a great deal of the content is not exclusive so if anyone has been a member of the more popular Eastern European sites like Teen Mega World then be careful because you may already have this content.
*The second thing you need to know is that a great deal of the content is softcore to midcore solo and g/g. There is still plenty of b/g hardcore but it's probably in the minority VS all the other stuff and you may have it on your computer.
*Of course if you prefer the less hardcore stuff than you should find plenty to satisfy your desire but again you have to make sure than you don't already have that content on your computer.
I do and that's why I did not download much and worse I didn't keep much of it.
*A big problem for me was the fact that a model would have only a photoset when you now there must be an accompanying video somewhere on the net and vice versa she has only the video and not the photoset as well.
There's also the problem that there's duplication of the content across the network where a model's video or photoset is on more than one site and or her video is on one site while the photoset is on the other site. That's less of a problem and more of a headache because you can't search across the entire network so you have to look for each scene on the appropriate site.
**Breakdown of the content from most sites**
*young legal porn: 1480 photosets (170 of them have a resolution 4000x2600, the others 1000x562) videos approx 1250. over 425 are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080HD. About 400 are offered in all resolution except HD and the rest are only in 480p.
*18 only girls: 1590 photosets and nearly 1300 videos. See info on resolution for pics sets and videos for young porn since it looks t be about the same for this site.
*Beata porn: 286 phototsets and 198 videos. I'm not doing a breakdown of which photosets and/or videos has which resolution because it's a mess since I'm sure recent content is really much older than the date on it.
*Ivana: almost 1200 photosets and over 800 videos. I think the same thing that applies to Beata's site applies to Ivana's in regards to the content.
*Sasha blond: Over 1000 photosets and about 850 videos.
*Skinny: About 275 photosets and 180 videos.
**I'm not going to breakdown the info on the last 3 sites because they are dead and nothing has changed in a long time.**
***This can be an amazing network for the right people but do some research on your computer prior to joining to make sure that you don't already have most of the content.** |
|
08-04-13 09:27am
Replies (10)
|
Review
233
|
Your Mom Loves Anal
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Offers content that is sorely under represented.
+ The models age varies from the 40's all the way to late 60's.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the MP4 format. Resolution varies depending on production year but it's common to see 1280 x 720 on most of the videos.
+You can download the picture sets as a single file.
+You get a set of stills from each video that help you decide it it's worth watching or downloading. |
| Cons: |
-False advertising when it comes to the models that actually do anal.
-None of the content is exclusive. You can find all of these videos if you join other Score sites.
-The date on the videos is not the production date so it should only to be used as a reference point.
-They only have 64 videos and if Rabbits review is accurate than they actually lost 1 video since his Nov 25 2016 review. It may be even more if you consider that there were supposedly 4 videos added in December so the most recent count should be 69 and not 64.
-The videos are about 20-25 minutes long with usually only the last 8-10 minutes dedicated to anal.
-You supposedly get access to 15 other sites but in you could have simply had two or three sites that break down as anal only, interracial only videos and one that covers the rest.
-No search engine to help you find the content. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I can't help but feel that this is a pure cash grab by the Score group and that's too bad because it's not going to endear them to other people who might have joined one of their sites but may now think twice because if they can screw you here than why can't they do it elsewhere. I know because I'm the one who got conned into joining this site but if others avoid it than it was worth it.
*I should have realised that it was too good to be true the minute I visited the site and saw the names of so many women who had never done anal before that they were using the old bait and switch trick to fool visitors into thinking that you could finally see something that you hadn't before.
*If they at least had all of the anal scenes available from all the Score Group of sites than it would be worth it but as it is they only have a portion and I can't help but feel that they aren't ever going to add a lot more to this site.
*If anal starring more mature women is your thing than simply join some of the other Score sites that are sure to have a lot more content and will likely be cheaper than 30$.
**I try never to use pricing in my score and I won't this time but charging 30$ for these sites feels a lot like highway robbery and the owners should be ashamed** |
|
12-30-16 10:49am
Replies (2)
|
