| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Lezbo Honeys
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 170 scenes.
-The performers are well known Eastern Europeans and most of them in their early 20's.
-All the videos are downloadable as a whole or broken down into smaller sections(for those with slower connections).
The videos average about 20mins and are either wmv or mpeg4.
-The photosets can be downloaded per page or as a whole (zip format), and the quality is simply amazing photos are about 850 x 1280.
-Access to 35 other sites.
-They have a reward program for long term customers. For each month that you remain with them they give you access to 2 additional sites within the network for no extra cost. |
| Cons: |
-Navigating often requires the use of the back button as well as a significant amount of up & down scrolling.
-The videos can get tedious since they tend to resemble one another.
-The chemistry between some of the performers is sometimes lacking. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is another site belonging to 21 sextury, so you know the quality is there.
I got acces through Lez Cuties, so I can't tell you which site you might get from the network if you joined through Lezbo Honeys.
I wish some of the videos would be longer and that there would be more kissing. You sometime get a feeling that they have rehearsed the scene and that they are going through the motions. I would like more passion and spontaneity.
Just the price and acces to the network makes this a greta deal. |
|
10-27-08 06:51pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
127
|
Lily Cade
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusive (with reserve).
+Videos can now be downloaded as well as streamed online.
+There are 114 videos with one new video added each week and it's all dated.
+Lily has a blog where she post info about once a month on stuff she did or is about to do. |
| Cons: |
-Video resolution is only 480x272 and they all looked a little grainy.
-There are photos but I wasn't able to open them. They appear to be pics taken from the videos.
-The content is exclusive but only if you want to download them because they can be found on dvd or streaming sites.
-Site is a little slow to surf. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I have been aware of Lily as a performer and a director for a couple of years now. She is a lesbian only girl so don't expect to ever see her with a guy. She seems to be a very popular girl with many performers and she does have a great talent for acting and directing.
*The scenes she directs or stars in tend to be very good and they can get a little nasty but almost never extreme.
*The biggest con against this site is that the videos are a little too grainy for me which is too bad because there are some great ones here. The good news is that this was once a streaming only site so at least we can now download the videos.
*The other advantage is that since there are no other download sites with this content then it's either paying for each dvd or paying to sream them on sites like AEBN and Hot Movies.
*There are pics but I wasn't able to see or download them so I can't speak for quality but I do know that there are no zip files for these so you'd have to download each pic one by one.
**I think this isn't a bad site per say and it's only 20$ so even if you don't wind up downloading anything then you at least get a very good idea the kind of porn Lily stars and directs and this can help you save or spend on movies you were thinking about. |
|
09-02-13 09:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Little Caprice
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Little Caprice is such a cute innocent looking girl that it's hard to believe she does hardcore porn.
-The content is all exclusif and this is the only site other than Woodman where she does anal.
-There are 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and they are all 1280x720 in resolution.
-You get access to 4 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The site is a little slow to surf and hell when it comes to downloading videos. It took me over 2 hours to download one HD video.
-They don't date their content so no sure way of verifying if and when they update except to say that TBP had 70 videos listed for them October 2010 and they now have 86 videos.
-There are over 100 photosets and resolution is is at least 1600x1067 but you can only download them pic by pic. You can't downalod photosets as a single zip file.
-I consider only 2 of the 4 sites included to be a good match for people that might enjoy this one and one of those is no longer updating with new content.
-There`s a forum where Caprice answers members but after reading a few post from her then all I can say is why bother. Theres nothing personal in her replies `to the popint that you don`t know if it`s her or the guys who manage the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is another solo model site that does some good things but drops the ball on key features that would rise it above mediocre. I think it`s important for any site to date their content so that new members know when to expect new stuff. If you are going to offer photos then make sure these can be downloaded as a complete photoset zip file. Attaching your site to other models site is only good if this adds to the overall quality and quantity. A bad site isn`t made beter if you add 3 other bad site to it all you have is more crap than you add before.
-If you are a fan of Little Caprice and want to collect as much as you can from her porn work then you have to join this site. For all others then it`s a question of whether she and some of the other girls have enough appeal to make the expenditure worth it. |
|
07-15-11 07:08pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
129
|
Little Mutt
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some truly amazing looking young women.
-A Good mixture of videos and stills
-The price of 15$.
-Cancelling is very easy. |
| Cons: |
-This site might be the slowest one I have ever joined. I don't know if they've been having some server problems in the last 30 days but how bad can it be when it takes about 3hrs to download a 7 minutes video?
-Navigation from page to page isn't better. It can take from a few seconds to a minute for the page to fully open. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've had my eye on this site for quite some time and when I noticed that we could get it for 15$ then I thought that I'd give it a try. Needless to say I can't tell you how good or bad this site is because trying to view or download the content requires more patience then I've got.
I wish that I could recommend this site because I think they have some good material but I have only been able to download about 6 videos and I can't be bothered to wait the all the hours it would require to scroll through their content.
I've emailed them to see what's happening so if I get a reply then I will amend this review but for now. I'd stay away from the site. |
|
10-11-09 10:01am
Replies (10)
|
Review
130
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nearly 200 scenes.
-Authentic Grandma looking performers.
-They have both BG/GG scenes.
-Video download options are among the best on the net with WMV and H.264 both at different levels of quality from low to high.
-Photosets can be downloaded whole in zip format.
-Immediate acess to 30 sites from the 21Sextury |
| Cons: |
-The fact that most of their performers truly look like grandmas can be a serious turn off.
-The new network is a little slower than the original (They may still be in the beta stage). |
| Bottom Line: |
I didn't join LustyGrandmas but got access with my pix and video membership. I did download a couple of scene, but this truly isn't one of my fetishes. Many of the older performers really look like grandmas. They are much older than a typical cougar, they have higher body fat, many have sagging breast, many have greying hair, and to be honest most are way past their prime and quite a few never had one.
If the above body type appeals to you then this is your site. For the others I'd recommend a quick visit. I'm more of the later so my score is in part because of my lack of interest in this site.
Of course you get quite a few other great sites with your membership so even if this one doesn't appeal to you. The fact that many of the others in the network do might be a great incentive to join. I've noticed that you don't get the same access with each membership so I recommend you always take a look at which site come wqith the mebership and then pick that site knowing you want the other in the network. |
|
01-30-10 08:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Mandy Mitchell
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There's good chemistry between Mandy and the other performers.
+The videos can be downloaded in WMV, ipod and quicktime.
+The medium resolution for the WMV videos is 1280x720.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is 1067x1600.
+All content is dated.
+A large part of the content is Mandy with women.
+You can join mandy's site for 20$ or you can join the full TS network for 35$. |
| Cons: |
-There is no specific date for updates and they can be a little long in coming. Mandy seems to be trying to add more content and to make sure that there is at least one update per week.
-If you are looking for TS having sex with men or other TS than you might want to look for another site because a good part of the content is Mandy with women.
-The downloads speeds are not very good when downloading the Hi-Res videos. You average about 180KB/sec.
-Many of the scenes are broken into 2 or more videos so out of 74 HC videos. You really only have 35 or so actual scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my first time joining a TS site and the only reason I joined this one is because Mandy has a lot of content where he/she has sex with women. I won't get into the debate if a TS is a woman or a man because it doesn't matter to me since the only type of TS porn I watch is when it's a TS with a woman. The reason why I didn't pick the full network access is that most of the other TS in the network mostly work with men or other TS. That's too bad for me because I would have loved to have found more content but that could be a huge plus for those looking for that type of porn.
*Mandy has chosen to stay natural so no breast implants and she is a pretty feminine looking TS with a female sounding voice. Not sure if that is the norm but that was also a plus for me. Mandy is still able to get a decent hard-on so the penetration shots are pretty good.
*This is a pretty fringe fetish so it's hard to know who this will appeal to. If you are like me and enjoy seeing a TS have sex with women than this is a very good site but if on the other hand you prefer to see TS with men or other TS than stay clear because i don't think there is enough content here to satisfy. I would recommend you take the network membership instead since you'll get all of Mandy's stuff and get access to 16 other TS sites. |
|
11-15-11 07:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
MMM100.net
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-A very thorough and easy navigation system that allow users to find almost anything on the site.
-Their choice of performers seems more geared toward promoting amateurs and up & comers rather than established stars.
-They like to film their videos in a wide variety of locations from beautiful beaches to your basic porn bedroom.
-Many the perfomers have a progression of scenes from basic nudes to the more hardcore stuff.
-updates come at least every 2 days.
-Videos can be downloaded as a single file in wmv
with an avergage resolution of 640x360 but their newer videos now come in HD as well. |
| Cons: |
I put some asteriks on some of the cons because, although they weren't a problem for me, they might be to some people.
**As far as I can tell, all the scenes involve the use of condoms.
**Navigation may be possible in a couple of languages but the content is mostly all French and Spanish with no English subtitles.
**Most of the performers are French and Spanish which explains the above spoken language con.
-Male performers are not necessarily established stars which can be a turn off.
-Although many of the girls/women appearing on this site also appear on explcite. On this site they have chosen to go for an amateurish look rather than a glamourous one.
-There is a good percentage of the girls that sport some obvious tattoos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm French Canadian so the fact that most of the dialogue is in French was not a turn off for me but the opposite. That could be a problem for some but then again most Eastern European sites have either no dialogue, basic English or some Russian.
This site may appeal more to people that prefer their models to be more natural looking with very little artificial embellishements and don't mind condoms in their sex scenes. That last one is very important because I know that it's a big sticking point for some.
**Their credit card processor is cgbilling.com and I had never heard of them before this but I have no complain. |
|
10-08-10 08:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Mofos Network
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to 12 sites with one membership.
+They have over 900 exclusif scenes.
+They offer one very good bonus site that gives you access to over 4000 dvd's.
+They have an excellent selection of young US performers doing some of their first porn shoots.
+They also have a very good selection of models from the US, Europe and South America and they are from different age groups so not limited to just teens.
+Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats. You have PSP, iPad and 3GP for mobile devices. You have MPEG, MPEG4 and WMV in standard resolution and you also have MPEG4, 1080 and 720 for High Def.
+All videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies per pic. I saw some at 1333 x 2000 and I also saw some at 1300 x 867. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con for me is the fact that way too many of the videos are shot in POV and this is one of my least favorite shooting style.
-Since many videos are POV then the lighting suffers and that means that some of the shots are not as bright and clear as if it was shot by a cameran instead of the male performer.
-The fact that many of the videos are POV only then it can get repetitious rather quickly.
-I found that too many of the US performers had visible razor burns and pimples.
-They have copied Brazzer and started filming some Live shows but there are only 3 and they are very poor cousin to Brazzers live shoots.
-I'm adding one con in regards to their preview pages. These guys have one of the worst preview page I have ever seen from a large network. I dare anyone to tell me if they can figure out what's available in the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I got access to the network with my membership to let's try anal but I've only downloaded a couple of videos from the different sites in the network so this is not a network that has much appeal for me. The POV is in large part why I haven't been able to download more videos. It would be really amazing if they went to a different format but I don't think that's what they want to do with this network. I have actually downloaded a lot more content from the bonus dvd site I got with my membership. They have many dvd available on Videobox so that might not appeal for eveyone but they also have a pretty decent amount of older movies which are not available except on streaming sites. The quality of these vidoes is hit and miss but I'll still take them.
*If you enjoy POV videos than you should find plenty of stuff to satisfy you from the various sites. Otherwise I would recommend you check if some of the other sites in the network appeal to you. Of course I don't know how you'll be able to do that since their preview pages are awful.
**My score is based more on the content they offer than what i got out of the main network of sites. |
|
01-02-12 09:11am
Replies (5)
|
Review
134
|
Mom POV
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many of their models are true unknowns not seen on any other sites.
+They have an excellent mix of models and
+They update with one new video per week.
+All videos can be downloaded in MP4 with a 720x480 resolution.
+Most of the scenes are suprisignly well shot and the sex is often quite good.
+The site is about 2 years old and already has 108 videos.
+A decent percentage of thse milfs do anal.
+You can stream videos in 518x288, 720x405 and 1024x576. |
| Cons: |
-The title of the site makes it clear that you are only going to get POV shots.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then selecting one of the model on that page.
-The content is dated but you have to use a very convoluted way to know the date.
-There is also a scene description but you again have to find that in a convoluted way.
-There are absolutely no pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm pretty sure the people who own and operate girlsdoporn are also responsible for this site. Everything from the site design to the interview to filming style is identical in every aspect except that the guy who shoots for this site seems to know a lot more on how to use a camera than the guy who shoots for girldoporn. Now it is possible that it's the same guy but he does a far superior here than on the other site.
*Here are the important things you need to ask yourself to see if this is the kind of site you would enjoy.
1-Do you like older women(they have some 30years old but most of the women are in their 40's, 50's and even in their 60's.
2-Is body art a problem. Not all the models have ink but a large enough group does that if you have to have all natural then you may want to avoid.
3-Is POV shot porn a negative then avoid since it's all POV. I actually didn't mind it too much and I known for not liking POV.
4-Do you have to have HD content. They don't and even if it's available then I suspect that they do like GDP and make it available only to members who stay with the site for multiple months.
You'll know if you will enjoy the site based on how you answered the above questions or at least on how flexible you are on some of them. I know that I enjoyed the site and have no problem recommending it but there's plenty of room for improvement.
*The first thing would be the addition of an actual camera guy to get different shots but I guess that will never happen since it would make the sites name redundant. They should make the features on the preview section available to the paying members. It would save people like me from opening two seperate pages so that you know what the action in the video will be.
**I did recognize a couple of models from this site on some of Scores sites so they are not all unknowns. |
|
12-09-12 04:58pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
135
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1-Unbelievable amount of nude/sex celebrities.
3-Content is international and not just the US.
2-Downloadable Flash & WMV scenes.
3-Downloadable stills from scenes.
4-The search engine is easy to use and amazing at searching unusal parameters. |
| Cons: |
1-Although they mention a nude scene. They don't always have physical proof.
2-Although they update daily. Much of that is of newer material.
3-I find the price of 24.95 a little high.
4-The quality of the scenes is not always very good. |
| Bottom Line: |
*No doubt that Mr Skin is still the king of nude celebrities. I've never seen another site that has so many nude celebrities from the past to today or from around the world.
*The search engine is amazing because it allows the user to search by body type, hair color, date of birth, and many more.
*Having been an on and off member for the last couple of years. I can't help but find that although new content is added daily. Much of it is from recent material as oppose to hard to
find scenes.
*My biggest problem is that Mr Skin mentions specifics nude scenes and has a description, but no actual stills or video. My opinion is that if you can't prove it, then don't mention it.
*Be forwarned that unlike in the past. The trial memership is no longer a full access one. Now you
can stream, but cannot download.
*I wish that the price was lower, maybe 15-20$. |
|
09-28-08 09:13am
Replies (7)
|
Review
136
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The quantity of nude celebrities Mr Skin has accumulated is monstrous. Most nude scenes have a miniclip. The search engine for the site is very flexible, and great for people who can't remember much about an actress. You can ask for a movie or a specific TV show. You can look under nationality, even under age. You can download all clips or images. Trial membership allos acces to all th site. updates regularly. |
| Cons: |
Although Mr Skin may have the information about a specific actresse's nude scene, he does not always have a picture or clip of it. With such a large library of clips and pictures the search engine does not always bring up all the info. I would love for some of the clips to be longer. The quality of the clips is at best average. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you want to find an actresse's nude scene you have to at least try MR Skin, if he doesn't have it, then I don't think any other site will. Not to mention, but with the price of 3 day trial as low as this...What do you to lose? There are a few others out there with similar offerings, but none with the amount of content offered here. |
|
04-14-07 07:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Mrs. Siren
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.
*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.
*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me. |
|
08-07-11 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Most of their content appears to be exclusif.
-They have some of the only hardcore scenes from certain models.
-A very good selection of teen models.
-Videos can be downloasded in low, Med or high quality(all WMV).
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete zip file(resolution 1200x800).
Content is dated and they appear to update every 5 days.
-They have a little over 500 videos and more than 600 photosets in their library. |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds are pretty poor. I could use a download manager but I could only download one file at a time and surfing the site would kill my download speed.
-Some of their content is leased.
-Some of the male performers in the videos seem to be the models boyfriend so it adds a certain amateur style to the videos but this can be distracting since they aren`t pros. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a decent site with some good content & cute teens doing a mixture softcore, midcore and hardcore shoots but the download speeds make it hard to recommend. This might be a temporary situation because I don`t remember having that problem the first week I joined the site.
My score is based in large part to the speed issue and not so much the content. This is a good site if you like to see Eastern European teens having sex. |
|
02-20-11 09:40am
Replies (5)
|
Review
139
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+The sex scenes are rather well done for an amateur site and there is a decent amount of hardcore sex.
+Jackie is a hot looking older woman. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is a mess because you are never too sure where to go to find something.
-Many of the videos are in more than one file.
-Video resolution is 640x 480 at best and it's not that unusual to see some 320 x 240.
-Content is not dated so no way to be sure when it was done but the site appears to be more or less dead now.
-There isn't much here. I counted less than 60 videos.
-It take at least 20 minutes to download a single video file. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm a returning member to this site and very little has changed. That's neither good nor is it bad. It looks the same and the content is in the same location. I even found some videos that I don't remember from my last time but I'm hard pressed to say if that's because they are new or because I didn't see them the last time I was here. Her appearance changes from one video to the next but I think that has more to do with the way they are set up on their different pages rather than because of any chronological order.
*This is an amateur site that a husband and wife started over a decade ago and I guess they get enough members to keep it alive. Not sure if Jackie still does porn but I doubt it. Mind you my score is not that high but I'm not too disappointed in my membership. My only real disapointment is that I wish Jackie was still doing porn because she is(or was) quite good at it.
*I suspect that if you don't care too much about video resolution, large libraries of content and professionally shot porn then you might be happy with this site. Otherwise stay away because you definitely won't be.
**I kept my old score because there is still some decent stuff here.** |
|
06-22-13 06:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
140
|
My Hot Wife
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-Jackie is an attractive all natural over 40yold woman who really enjoys having sex with mostly black men.
-They appear to still be updating with new content
-They have a forum where Jackie and/or Jason her husband answer their members.
-Over 60 videos
-They use CCbill as a CC processor.
-Videos are all shot by another person so none of that POV or one camera crap. |
| Cons: |
-Download speeds are not very good at about 228Kb.
-The content is not dated so no way of knowing when the videos were filmed.
-There aren't many photosets and none of them are Hi-Res.
-There are about 60 videos but only 26 of these are in one file |
| Bottom Line: |
-I was rather surprised with what I found on the site mostly because these stand alone amateur sites more often miss than hit the target. It's true that there isn't a lot of content compared to other sites and a lot of it is a couple of years old but I was still able to find about 6-7 videos that are keepers.
-All the videos are shot by another person who's probably her husband Jason and he's not bad as a cameraman. The camera doesn't linger on only one angle and you don't have to suffer through POV only shots.
-If you like enthusiastic middle age women who like to have sex with strangers on camera then you might find somthing here. Anyone looking for teen girls should avoid. |
|
06-07-11 08:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
My Pickup Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They currently have 100 videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
-Access to 5 other sites with one membership.
-Most videos come in at least standard 1024x576 AVI and a large part also include HD 1280x720.
-Videos can be streamed in Flash.
-Many photosets can be viewed online and they can all be downloaded as a single zip file.
-You can vote on your favorite girl or video and post comments. |
| Cons: |
-The same model can appear on more than one site where she performs similar sex acts.
-Download speeds aren't bad but you can usually download a maximum of 4 videos at the same time and sometimes only 2. You cannot surf any of the sites once you havw reached your maximum number of downloads because their server will give you an error message.
-Many of the models are given a name different then what we know them under.
-The dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitle.(that might annoy some).
-As the title implies. This is a site where we are meant to believe that these everyday girls are picked up by these guys and inticed into having sex on camera.(it doesn't really work). |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a pretty good site as long as you don't care about the little scenarios and the dialogue that's in Russian. The scenarios didn't work for me because I recognized the performers and they are all pornstars.
The download speeds and the fact that you can only download a maximum of 4 videos and often only 2 videos is a little annoying. This is compounded by the fact that surfing the site and network is impossible during those periods.
-Membership gives you access to 5 other sites.
The only site that might include lease content is chickiporn and that's why I won't review it.
studentsexparties.com
cashforsextape.com
hardfucktales.com
porntraveling.com
chickiporn.com |
|
12-31-10 08:32am
Replies (6)
|
Review
142
|
My Sex Life
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif and you get a sense that Lori is involved in it.
+There is a nice drop down menu for finding pics and videos using certain keywords.
+585 photosets which are boken down into sub-categories. The resolution varies from set to set but 800x1200 is common.
+353 videos which are also broken into
sub-categories. Resolution on many is now offered in 640x480 and you also have some with 720x480.
+You can book Lori for personal webcams.
+You get access to 25 other sites. |
| Cons: |
All the videos that are hardcore, BJ and handjob star Lori and only her husband. These are all shot using a tripod or handcam.
-The length on many of the vidoes is under 10 minutes.
-Resolution on a percentage of the videos is only 320x240.
-Content is not dated so hard to tell how old it is.
-All the pics except for the glamour sets are taken from the video shoots. Those seem to be the ones with the worst resolution. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is Lori Anderson's site and she's a 30+ yrs old blond woman with an all natural body that enjoys being filmed doing the nasty with herself, her girlfriends or mostly her husband. I often complain that solo model sites don't make their site more personal. This is not the case here. It looks like Lori is involved and she has done some really good things inside.
*The problem for a guy like me is that the one thing she does wrong are the videos. I like pics but I don't really collect them. I love videos and unless you have some good ones than I'm going to be disapointed. How much depends on how badly the videos are. The first thing that I noticed about the videos is that she has a lot of the same thing. 91 BJ videos with her husband is overkill. You add 63 handjob videos with her husband. Then there are 92 hardcore videos but again they are with her husband. The only ones that don't include her husband are the G/G videos but there are only 17 of these and a couple are barely 10 minutes long.
*I could have overlooked the fact that she only does hardcore with her husband but shooting all that content using a tripod or handcam is a deal breaker. It made sense that in the beginning they wanted to save money by shooting their own content but at some point they should have hired someone to film them. As it is. All you really have are variation of the same stuff.
***If you like or don't mind videos that are shot using a tripod or handcam than you will be happy with Lori's site. I'd recommend that anybody like me avoid it.***
-My score is based on what they offer and not what I took from it. |
|
08-05-11 07:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-They have a very good navigation system that allows you to search by model name or selecting from 39 ndifferent paramers like sexual fetish, body type and hair color.
-They currently have over 700 videos.
-Newer videos can be dowloanded in low, medium and high quality.(medium quality is 720x408)
-They have over 500 photosets.
-They are still updating with new content every 2 days or so. |
| Cons: |
-Only 290 of the videos are single files. Any video prior to december 2008 is broken into 6 or more clips.
-Content appears to be exclusive but it is so similar to other sites like Seventeen, pack of porn and a slew of other sites that it's hard to tell if you don't already have a similar scene from one of those sites. Add the fact that they use the same models on these sites.
-The cost is way too high for what you get.
-The quality of the photosets are very good but there aren't that many pictures in each of them. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is one of those sites that although I have visited from time to time and often wished I could join. I would never have joined because of their join price. The only reason I'm able to do a review is because I got a special offer that gives me access a bunch of sites belogning to the parent company for a insignificant amount.
-This would be a pretty decent site if you could get access to it through some kind of network offer like teen mega world. There are some good videos to be found inside. It's too bad that more than half of them are in multiple clips. That really hurts them.
-If you like the content found at Seventeen and pack of porn then you should like this site. |
|
04-09-11 07:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
144
|
Naughty Alysha
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Alysha is an attractive blue eyed blond milf with large breast who seems to prefers extreme penetration sex to anything else.
-There are over 1000 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV. They also offer MP4 on some videos.
-There are almsot 1000 photosets and they can all be downloaded as complete zip files. Newer sets are 1225x816.
-You get acces to 8 more sites.
-The content is dated and they are still adding to the site. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con for me is that although there are many videos. More than 2/3 of these last only a few seconds long to a couple of minutes.
-Older photosets have really poor resolution so likely not worth saving.
-They have a search engine but I can't figure how to use it and the design is likely to cause more headache than anything else.
-The content gets repetitous to the point where one scene looks identical to another one. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Naughty Alysha is quite naughty and into some serious penetration (mostly Vaginal). She uses some really large toys to penetrate herself and when one is not enough then she'll use a couple instead. mind you some of the toys she uses are so large that it would be impossible to use more than one.
-She's a beautiful woman and a good performer. I wish she would do more standard B/G or G/G content than the extreme penetration stuff. It's moderately interesting the first few times but gets tiresome after you've seen it done a half dozen times.
-Her site is a good mix for the network because most of them are into this type of porn and that is a good thing if you like extreme penetration porn. To be avoided by anyone who does not want to see a woman insert a toy that is larger than a childs head or double fisted. |
|
07-18-11 02:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Naughty America
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are over 5000 scene to choose from.
+They have a great mix of mostly US performers from teens to women of varying ages.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search by keywords.
+You can stream the videos online.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV and they started to offer the Quicktime version sometime in 2007. Video resolution from 2007 and onward is at least 720x400.
+Videos from 2009 to today are now also offered in two HD format: 720p and 1080p.
+You can view or download the photosets that accompany each scene.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with about a dozen new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-They actually have two real time feeds for cam sites running on a couple of their main pages.
-They have two side tabs on the right of the screen that have to be closed each time you change pages and although not that big. they are still a distraction.
-I didn't see a method to scroll back through their library so that you can see all their content. The only way you can view content past two months is if you use the porn finder option and select a tag word. Of course if the scene was not proprerrly tagged then you willnever find it.
-Using the back button to return to your previous page wil always bring you back to the first page no matter on what page you were.
-The site is clutered with advertising for their own sites or for third party stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
***The 5$ join price was impossible to pass up. Especially for fans of sites like Brazzer, Bangbros and Reality King. There are some variations in the sites but they all pretty much offer the same type of content and they tend to also hire the same performers. This site may be a litttle more geared toward the couples market or at least people interested in scenario driven kind of porn. Now just because it might be more couple friendly does not mean that the sex isn't hot and raunchy because it is.
**If anyone saw my exchange with a webmaster on a recent review in regards to live feeds of cam sites then you can imagine that this site lost a lot more points because they actually have two of these. I'm sorry that sites feel the need to do that to make money but if they must then the least they can do is make sure that it is in a section that must be selected and not on the main pages of the site.
**There is a lot of advertising clutering the site and this takes up a lot of screen space. You even have to close one pop up and skip over an advertising page each time you log in.
**The bottom line is that for 5$ or even the normal 10$. You will more than get your moneys worth and even the annoying advertising and the stupid live feeds shouldn't be such a problem.
***My score would have been in the 90's if it wasn't for the live feeds.*** |
|
10-13-12 11:42am
Replies (6)
|
Review
146
|
Naughty America
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Another site with sex scenes that have actual scenarios.
-A gigantic library with over 3000 scenes.
-A very good selection of models that cover most age groups and body shapes.
-Their navigation system is quite simple to use and there are multiple methods to reach a model, fetish or particular scene.
-Surfing and download speeds are excellent.
-They offer multiple levels of quality for their videos that include normal to DVD quality. I notice that they also now offer HD on some of the newer videos.
-The price for joining is a plus because I'd expect to pay more for their content. |
| Cons: |
-They have a small video advertising their lives shows that pops open every time your return to the main page.
-They have cross-sale offers that clutter some of their pages.
-Quite a few of their models have implants of varying sizes.
-Some of the scenarios are hit and miss. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Another amazing site with actual scenarios that have a scenario, dialogue, foreplay and pretty good acting(for the most part).
-Their content is similar to Brazzer and Reality Kings. It's a toss up on which of these does a better job. I give extra points to NA for their selection of stars. Their selection of models include more of the upcoming stars.
I highly recommend this site to anyone that still wants an actual story in his/her sex scene. |
|
11-26-09 07:02pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
147
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Desirae is a hot blond all natural woman in her 40`s who does vaginal and anal sex.
-The site has restarted updating with new photos and videos.
-There are over 150 videos at the moment.
-There are over 300 photosets(see cons).
-Desirae also post info on her blog?journal |
| Cons: |
-All the videos are filmed using a tripod or an handheld camera so it's always the same shots with the same angles.
-Many of the videos have little scenarios like fucking my boss and so forth but they were all with her husband. It's pretty obvious because of the above con.
-She does have many photosets but you can only download them pic by pic. She does not offer them as a single zip file.
-Only the new content is dated and that's 4 videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I have had my eye on Desirae's site for many years and I thought that now would be a good time to try it since I'm in solo model site mode.
Desirae is an attractive 40 years old woman with an active sex drive and knows how to play to the camera. There is clearly a lot of great things to like about this type of site for anyone that likes or at least doesn't mind videos filmed in POV or tripod only.
-The biggest problem for me is that I don't like POV and tripod only porn. I find that it's too limiting to the viewer because there are only so many different ways to film a scene using those 2 methods. It also makes believing any scenario porn impossible because it's filmed in such a way that the fantasy is ruined.
-Desirae mentions that she recently got divorced so that could explain why she stopped updating and some of the recent changes on the site.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I took from it. |
|
07-03-11 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A nice clean site that is easy to navigate with icons that quickly get you where you want to be.
-Each video is tagged with multiple keywords but you can only search by one keyword at a time.
-There are over 1300 videos to choose from that go back as far as 2001. (Needless to say quality is quite poor on those early videos.
-Their video resolution has followed technology so that they have added from their original SD to now include HD as well as 4K for any video produced from 2016 to now.
-They update on average with 10 to 14 new videos each month and each video is dated.
-They have a wide selection of models to choose from with an emphasis on natural looking women and surprisingly a few of them even became top performers in the industry.
-They offer cam content but I'm not a fan of that type of porn so can't add anything. |
| Cons: |
-The site is a bandwidth hog that rarely allow you to do more than download one video at a time or navigate the site itself. Let alone the net. Trying to download more than one video is not recommended.
-Videos start automatically instead of waiting for the user to click on the start button.
-Obviously the further back you go. The worse the video resolution gets. The early stuff is 320p.
-Not necessarily a con but their 4K videos are huge files that are above 4G and some go as high a 6.5G.
-The video are all handheld and Tripod shot so it's a mix of eclectic and static. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I have had my eye on this site for years but I was always nervous to join because they have such a piss poor preview section and needless to say I was really nervous to invest money for fear I would regret it but boy was I wrong. This is one of those rare sites that you should not judge by it's cover.
*Granted if you aren't into POV/Handheld porn than don't bother to go any further but if you can live with it than you will find that the guys knows their stuff.
*I really like the fact that most of the models are natural looking. I would prefer to see less ink on some of them but they aren't the more common and you can often overlook it. There are a few older women but the vast majority are late teens to primarily 20 year olds.
*The sex is pretty hot and the women really look into it. There is a mix of vaginal with quite a few anal videos as well(80 at last count). You also get a nice mix of g/g with b/g.
*The only major negative is the bandwith the site eats and you are talking to a guy that as ultra-high speed internet. I can normally download huge video files from other sites while still surfing the net but you can't do that here and if you are into 4k videos than be prepared to wait at least 20 minutes for the file to download before you can download another one or surf the net.
*It's also very annoying that the videos start automatically because that means that once you select a scene than you will wait a few seconds for the player to buffer the video before it starts.
*The guys talking can be annoying to some but it didn't bother me and he mostly does it in the beginning when he is doing this pseudo-interview.
*Now this is supposed to be a network of sites but seeing as they all seem to be shot from the same locations and the action is about the same in all of them then I wouldn't necessarily call it a network but I also don't care because it's the content that's important and it's amazing.
If you don't care that it's handheld/tripod porn than this is an excellent site to join. |
|
04-04-20 11:16am
Replies (0)
|
Review
149
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-Models are all in their teens to early 20's.
-A good selection of body types.
-They currently have 60 scenes.
-All scenes can be streamed or downloaded.
-Movie downloads are wmv with basic resolution at 640x480, hi-def at 1280x720 and they also offer true hi-def 1920x1080 for some of the scenes.
-Some of the scenes can downloaded to an ipod format
-You can download photosets in a zip format. There are about 200+ pictures per set and resolution is usually 853x1280
-The sex tends to be leaning toward the extreme.
The majority of it is anal with quite a few dp's and dap's included.
-Navigation with the site or withing the network is very easy. |
| Cons: |
-This site like all the others in the network permits only one download at a time. You can navigate but do not try to downalod more than one scene.
-It takes about 20-30 minutes to download a regular version scene and about an hour for a hi-def scene.
-The sex is extreme and may not appeal to some people. A DP is one thing but a DAP is more circus act then anuthing else.
-Updates are sporadic and therefore difficult to anticipate. They seem to update once to twice per month.
-The models names will require a little research since they may not be what you know them under. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you can overlook the one scene download at a time and like your sex a little extreme than this site will deliver. I'd say that for the most part that the network will deliver as well.
A major improvement would be to allow for more than one dowload at a time and accelerate the download speed. 30 minutes for regular scene and an hour for an hi-def one is a major problem.
I'd like to see a proper schedule for their updates or make them on the same day each month.
This is a good network of sites for those that join, download the content and then leave. I don't think it's worth more than a one month membership. More so since some of the sites don't have a lot of content and updates aren't the greatest. |
|
06-30-09 07:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
150
|
Oldje
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership. |
| Cons: |
-They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.
*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.
*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.
**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**. |
|
02-02-13 10:53am
Replies (8)
|
