| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Oldje
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content. |
| Cons: |
-They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.
*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.
*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.
**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.
***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.*** |
|
05-07-12 06:57am
Replies (13)
|
Review
152
|
Oldje
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
11-22-10 01:50pm (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
|
| Pros: |
-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes. |
| Cons: |
-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.
I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some. |
|
11-22-10 08:51am
Replies (9)
|
Review
153
|
Pack Of Porn
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some exclusif and non-exclusif content.
-A wide variety of models to choose from.
-A huge library of content(over 1200 videos).
-Some of the sites are still updating with new content.
-They use the correct name for most performers.
-They have a good search interface system that allows memebers to find content under a specific site, models name or sex act/fetsih.
-The dialogue is almost always in English.
-Photos can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-The quality of the older vids is not very good.
-Difficult to tell what is leased and non-leased so it's difficult to say what is exclusif to the network.
-Some of the videos can only be downloaded in multiple clips.
-Some of the same models perform similar sex acts on more than one site.
-Most of the sites are no longer updating. |
| Bottom Line: |
-There are quite a lot of good videos to choose from but only old farts young tarts and spunky teens seem to still be updating with exclusif new content. The other sites which are updating but I'd bewilling to bet that this is all leased content is Lesbian Kingdom, UK road trip and jerk and slurp.
-This is a good network to try if you enjoy the old/Young fetish because this is the most common thread through many of the sites beside their main old fart young tarts. |
|
02-06-11 07:07pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
154
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 9 sites.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and they offer versions for smartphone and Ipads.
+All videos come in multiple resolution but 720P at 50fps is the highest possible.
+You can stream the videos in a flash player.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution is 1600x1067.
+They have a good selection of well known Eastern European models in their late teens early 20`s.
+Content is in a fetish category not well represented so that can be a major plus for fans.
+You get a special priceof 19.99$ through TBP/PU |
| Cons: |
-The premise may seem a creepy to some.
-A giant man in a panda suit doesn`t make for great sex scenes.
-The name given to the performers is rarely the one they are normally known under.
-There are only 26 scenes to choose from and they update about twice a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This would be a pretty awful stand alone site because I don't know if the content can really appeal to more than plushie fans. You have a man dressed as a giant panda who entices a young woman normally dressed as a young girl or semi-pretends to be a young girl into having sex with him. The sex often involves a dildo of varying size and color. I know that some may find the content slightly creepy but I mostly found it stupid. I might have had a different view if the man in the suit didn't grunt like a bear through most of the scene. I laughed the first time I heard him and didn't stop laughing since the grunting is through most of the video. It makes it hard to get turned on while you are laughing.
*Another huge problem is that since the guy is wearing a full panda suit then he can't see much, can't feel anything, and can't properly use the strap on either because of these two limtations. The girl is normally the one doing most of the work. What you wind up with is a little scenario with very little dialogue except for the grunting, a lot of finger pointing, not very good sex, and limited shots of the action because the suit is often in the way.
*I honestly don't know if this type of content can appeal to anyone other than flushie fans so if you aren't one of these than you'll probably want to staw away.
**Normally I would give a bigger score simply because you get access to much better sites but since most of the girls on this site have scenes on the other sutes than I'm treating this one more as a stand alone.** |
|
05-29-12 11:14am
Replies (3)
|
Review
155
|
Pix and Video
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Another great all European girls site. They offer movies and pictures(all downloadable)for each of their models. The quality for both is quite good. The sex ranges from solo, through lesbian, and finally boy girl. The sex is mostly mild to hardcore. They update quite frequently, and their calendar gives you a good idea wath the weeks will bring you. Download time is pretty good. |
| Cons: |
I'd like to see an alphabetical system, as oppose to the current numerical, to help users navigate all their models pages. I find the price a little high(29.95), but that isn't too bad. This site is part of a familly of sites, but you can't get access to all of them(without joinging all of them). They do offer specials where you can select 2 sites for an increase in price. They don't offer all possible choices. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good site: If you like to look at good looking Europeans girls having fun with either themselves and/or with others. If you like regular updates. If you enjoy variety. |
|
01-28-07 09:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
156
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The price for a 5 day trial is amazing, and you get to see a lot. There is enough to satisfy your average Playboy fan. The quality of the pictures is excellent. Navigation is made easy. |
| Cons: |
This may just be me, but I don't want to have to call to cancel my membership. If I join online, I should be able to cancel online, but not with Playboy plus. You have to call an 800 number to cancel your membership. Although you do get access to some magazine. they only go back a few years. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because I wanted access to their archive of magazines, but since they only had a few, I was really disapointed. Then the method for cancelling membership gave me a really bad taste. The trial price of 2.95$ for 5 days is unbeatable. |
|
10-27-07 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
Poon Net
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content appears to be all exclusif.
+Site caters to a fetish that is underrepresented.
+The art work is rather impressive.
+You get access to 6 other sites with similar content.
+You can save the pictures to computer |
| Cons: |
-The sites are all small with very little content.
-Too many of the comics have less than 20 pics to them so you aren't getting much.
-There is no way to download the comics as a single file.
-The art work is impressive on most of the comics but body proportions are often too exaggerated to be appealing.
-Content can get repetitious real fast.
-You have to log in to each site individually. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm in my exploring phase at the moment and I'm trying new things. It hasn't been a fruitful endeavour up to now and these sites are not going to change the trend. I can see that some of the artists have talent at drawing and some even have talent at writing stories but too many of the comics feel like a joke and a bad one at that so that you don't really enjoy any of them.
*I can't recommend this to anyone because there is just not enough decent content here to make it worth while for many people.
Here is a small breakdown of the content on each site:
*-Poon net has 59 comics but some have only a couple of pages. In many ways this feels more like a repository of the other sites content
**Jaguar has 8 comics and they aren't bad but body propartions are just too hard to deal with.
**Dirty Comics has technically about 40 comics but they are each so small I'd put the number more like 5.
**Andes has 15 comics but I don't know how of these are exclusive because they appear to be Japanese comics translated into English. These don't involve interracial like most of the others.
**Uncle sickey. This one is sort of anomaly because these aren't actually drawn comics but 3d generated images with some dialogue. There are 57 comics but over 20 have les than 15 images. Another problem is that you are basically looking at badly bad CGI to look.
**There is also blacks on celebs but it is so bad that no one should bother looking at the content...Ever. |
|
10-14-13 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
158
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusive and they update with one new video each week.
+The site is clean, sleak and well designed with an empasis on the enjoyment and ease of use for all members.
+They have a play list editor that allows members to directly edit videos on the site.
+You also get access to Teen Fidelity.
+They have a search engine that allows users to search by ethnicity, whether the model has implants or not whether there is a cumshot and whetehr there is anal in the video.
+All the videos have a little scenario.
+They currently have 518 models to choose from and of those 208 have implants.
+All videos can be streamed online.
+All videos can be downloaded in the MP4 format and resolution is at least 480p and 720p.
+Over 400 videos can be downloaded in 1080p and since January 2015 they also offer 4K videos(just over 90) |
| Cons: |
-The only male performer is Ryan Madison so unless you are a fan than avoid the site.
-You can use a download manager but download speeds can be a little slow(about 800Kb/sec for me). That can be an issue for people looking to download 1080p videos and it's definitely going to be an issue for the 4K fans.
-I find that some of the shooting locations limit the amount of possible camera angles |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is probably as perfect a site as anyone can hope to create. Most of my cons are so small and insignificant that most people can and should overlook them when considering joining. The only can that is likely to be an issue is that Ryan is the only male performer to appear with the models(There are a couple of exceptions). If you can't watch him than everything else is not of any importance to you because you won't want to watch it.
*I have always been a huge fan of their videos because Ryan and Kelly really know how to shoot amazingly hot porn. In an age where most gonzo porn are almost afraid to show kissing between the performers. These guys aren't shy and make sure that there is plenty which adds enormously to the heat and passion level of the videos.
*I suspect that Kelly may be behind the camera shooting the videos or is no longer interested in appearing with the other models because she used to be a participant in some of the older videos but you don't see her anymore. It's something that I miss and would love it if they would have more threesomes with Ryan, Kelly and the model.
*If Anal is your thing than be advised that they only have 49 videos but they are really good ones.
*Of course there is no lesbian content but that would really be an incredible thing if they chose to add that to their already incredible répertoir.
**The 4K videos are huge files in upwards of 5GB and most near and over 10GB so be forewarned that anything other than an High Speed Internet means you may never be able to download these files in less than a day. Something that is made clear on the download page of the site** |
|
12-11-16 10:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif and they add a new scene each week.
+You get access to teen fidelity as well.
+All videos can be downloaded in at least 480p which they increased to 540p in 2008 and most of the videos after that date are also offered in 720p
+The 100 more recent videos are now also offered in 1080p.
+They offer a B.T.S video of each shoot.
+All scenes have an photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution is approximately 900x600.
+Their selection of performers is top notch.
+You can stream the videos online and you can even jump to a specific part of the scene based on keywords.
+They have a playlist editor where you can create your own clips of the scenes.
+You can search based on whether a performer has natural breats or implants. |
| Cons: |
-There is very little not to like about the site except that the number of enhanced performers significantly outnumber the natural ones.
-Another negative is that a good portion of the models have tattoos.many of the models
-The only two performers are Kelly and her husband Ryan.(not an issue for me but could be for some). |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they keep putting out some of the best porn I've seen. There's very little that I don't like. That's not to say that all the scenes are as good as the others but there is a certain consistency in regards to quality. They even do some scenario based scenes from time to time which is a nice bonus for people like me who like their porn with a story.
*I didn't find anything really wrong with the site except that I would love to see two or more updates per week as opposed to just one. I know I'd be willing to pay more for that since it would mean a lot more of what I like.
**The only reason why I'm not giving the site a perfect score is because I want to see them hire a few more natural models. |
|
05-13-13 06:32pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
160
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are 398 videos and they add a new one every week.
+All the videos after January 2008 can all be downloaded in WMV and Quictime at 960x540 and 1280x720. Videos prior to date are 640x480.
+You can download a solo and BTS video starring the model form each shoot.
+The videos are all extremely well shot with the right camera angles, lighting and an impressive job from all performers.
+There is a photoset for each video shoot and these can be download as complete zip files. Resolution varies from set to set but the medium qulaity are at least 900x600 and 1300x900 for high quality ones.
+You can search for scenes under ethnicity of the model and/or whether she has natural breast or implants.
+Content is all dated.
+You can use a download manager.
++You can get a 3 day full access for 10$. |
| Cons: |
-A large percentage of the models have implants and/or tattoos.
-I wish their search option had more keywords to help members find certain types of videos.
-The only 2 performers appearing with the models are Kelly and her husband. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my second time at porn fidelity and the site keeps getting better. I had a hard time coming up with anything substantialy wrong with the site. About the only thing that might be nice would be a greater number of natural bodied models. That said they still have 144 models that are all natural.
*Kelly and her husband are amazing performers and they always seem to have great chemistry with the models. It may be talent or they pick models knowing that there'll be great chemistry.
Whatever the reason. Their scenes are always hot.
**To be avoided by anyone who doesn't want to see Kelly or her husband on screen because one or both of them is always in the video.*** |
|
08-10-11 09:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-07-14 03:23pm (Update History)
Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
|
| Pros: |
+There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either. |
| Cons: |
-They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites
*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.
*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.
*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.
I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues. |
|
10-05-14 11:02am
Replies (4)
|
Review
162
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A variety of gorgeous young Eastern European women performing in solo, g/g, b/g, b/b/g, fisting, waterplay, and a few other fetishes.
Downloads are quick, and quality is moderate to high. You can download both photos and videos.
The price is pretty good for what you get. Updates are regular. |
| Cons: |
My biggest problem is the promise of 30+ sites when you join. This is true only if you stick with them for more 120 days. They add to your overall access about 2 sites per month after the initial membership. The same women appear in more than one site peforming similar acts, and the content is partially exclusive. Navigation could be improved |
| Bottom Line: |
Even though you don't get access to all the promised sites upfront. You still get a lot of
content. I wish they would offer an option for selecting which sites you can pick when joining. Some of the content appears leased or scenes from dvds. ***I noticed on TBP that you could join through this site, but also with VIP XXX PASS. the difference is that the cost is only 24.95 with VIP XXX as oppose to 38.95*** I'd love to hear which sites were offered with VIP XXX PASS. |
|
08-31-07 08:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
163
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Their extensive library of videos(over 5500).
-They update almost daily.
-They have one of the best selection of newbies.
-Navigation is easy to use and allows search using a wide variety of options like hair color, nationality, fetish, age group and so forth.
-Download speeds are 500kB/sec or better.
-Can download multiple videos at the same time.
I was able to download more than 6 and that's without using a download manager.
-You can use a download manager.
-Photosets can be downloaded in zip format.
-The join price of 17.95$ is hard to beat. |
| Cons: |
-The fake cum. Why do they even bother to use that stuff? It might not be so bad if they didn't use it in industrial quantities but when you pretend to shoot a load that's half a gallon then who exactly are you trying to appeal to? It can't be fans of facials because I suspect those people prefer the real stuff than what looks like a mixture of water and icing sugar.
-Some of the fetishes are slightly misleading. Although they might mention anal in the scene. That can easily mean light anal play as oppose actual anal penetration.
-There is one site that has an idiot talking during the scene and that's always annoying.
-One of the site uses Ron Jeremy and I can't say that seeing is fat belly was very appealing.
-Prechecked cross sell.
-They have crappy preview pages. They could do far better and might help with traffic and actual membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
I read a couple of comments before joining the site about their business practices. I can't speak for the past but I had nor problem joining and leaving was just as easy.
There is a lot to enjoy about this network but I guess the biggest thing is the sheer amount of new girls just starting in porn and doing their very first scenes.
The one thing that really isn't enjoyable at all and I've already mentioned it is the FAKE CUM. I won't get further into the details but I will never give this network a score of 90 and above simply because of that. If it was used in small quantity then I suspect we couldn't really tell and that might be fine but not the way they currently use it.
I wish they would have a larger amount of anal. That is one of my favorite fetishes and I find that it's quite lacking on the network.
Some of the sites aren't updating anymore and some only do sporadic updates but I didn't have a problem with that because I found that other sites were doing similar content.
I think that if you like cute teens getting F..d and don't mind too much the fake cum then you will be happy with the network. The network should be avoided by anyone that hates the fake cum because you WILL be very disatisfied. |
|
08-15-10 10:35am
Replies (16)
|
Review
164
|
Porn Traveling
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get to see different travel locations like Egypt, Turkey and Thailand.
-The girls are very cute and most are newbies to porn.
-These appear to all be real life porn couples on vacation.
-Videos can be downloaded in iphone 460x320, AVI 1024x576 and HD 1280x720 format.
-Videos can streamed in Flash.
Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file. |
| Cons: |
-This is basically a variation of cashforsextape but here our real life couples are on vacation so why create a new site when these could have been added to the other site.
-Still a very small site with 3 travel locations.
-Ligthing is again not very good.
-Dialogue is all in Russian with English subtitles.
-Content is not dated so impossible to know when they are updating or if theyr still do.
-Many hours of videos to download but a lot of it is not about sex as much as couples playing and talking. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is basically cashforsextape on vacation. Many of the couples on that site are on this one but this time they are in an exotic locations. The major improvement is that most of the sex is filmed by a third party so less POV shots and we can see some of the action.
-This one suffers many of the same problems that cashforsextape did. The only exception is the third party camera shots.
-If you are curious to see how porn couples interact with each other and friends on vacation then you might enjoy this site but be warned that you'll have to watch a lot of content that has nothing to do about sex. |
|
01-01-11 09:37am
Replies (0)
|
Review
165
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Over 120 videos
-They update once a week.
-A mixture of European and American performers.
-They film in different locations than those normally used for other Kink shoots and some of these are outside locations.
-The models are not all well known performers.
-Videos can be downloaded in either WMV or mp4 and version comes in normal & HD quality.
You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-Photosets are broken in 4 sections and although
you can download each section whole. It would be nice if you could download the entire shoot as a single file.
-Each shoot as bystanders that aren't part of the action and I found that more distracting than anything else.
-The camera angles aren't always the greatest and that deducts from the enjoyment.
-I didn't enjoy a single one of the videos that are shot outside. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the second kink site that does little for me. Ultimnate Surrender is the other one. This one is more centered on sex but most of the shoot left me unsatisified. I think the main thing that bothers me is the addition of an audience for each shoot. The camera will from time to time pan toward the audience and then back to the girl and frankly that does nothing for me.
This site should appeal to people that like to watch porn with an audience but for the others I'd recommend a site like sex and submission. |
|
11-28-10 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+One of the best scenario driven porn site.
+Over 250 videos to choose from that are all dated.
+They add on average about 8-9 new scenes each month.
+All Video can be downloaded from 160p all the way to 1080P HD with at least 144 of the more recent videos being available in 4K.
+They hire every top performer in the US which include just about every body type, ethnicity and age group.
+The cinematography is top notch with good camera opertors who know how to use filters and proper lighting to add a level of realism rarely seen in porn.
+Membership includes access to the entire Adult Time network. |
| Cons: |
-A significant amount of the content is pseudo-incestuous in nature and that can be a problem for some. I mostly find that it makes for poor writing.
-Because this is scenario driven porn and not every performers is up to the task then sometime their inability to play their role correctly negatively affects the finish product.
-It would be nice to see more g/g only content. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I am more than comfortable is saying that PT shoots the best scenario driven porn today with no one coming close to them and that includes their sister site GW.
*Their use of lighting and filters completely alter what would normally be an overly bright and less believable scene. They don't rely on mostly tripod mounted shots which usually make most scenes look and feel static but like to use different shooting styles in the same scene and that increases the realism.
*The difference between them and their sister site Girlsway is so glaring that I find most GW videos to be sub-par to what they probably are simply because I judge them based on what the same producers can achieve on PT.
*I would love for them to add more lesbian only content because while they have 25 scenes that include some g/g content. Only 8 of their videos are actual lesbian themed scenes and as I have already mentioned. The stuff GW does feels so subppar and makes it nearly impossible for me to enjoy it.
*I also wouldn't mind if they did more multiple scene scenarios that intermix the different performers.
*The only warning I might add is that if you're a hardcore gonzo porn fan then this may not be the site for you because while the sex is all hardcore. I'm not sure gonzo fans will be happy The scenario is an integral part of the overall scene and skipping that to get to the sex will affect the quality of the sex scene as they lose the context for the sex. |
|
04-12-20 12:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Rage Story
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-Videos can be downloaded in 4 different formats which include WMV at 1920x1080, MPG & WMV at 768x432 and MP4 at 480x270.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and there are over 400 pics per set and the resolution is 1200x800.
-Content is dated. |
| Cons: |
-They claim that you get bonus access to their sites mybrosgf.com and meetmysweet.com but in fact you don't have access to any other site. If you click either links then you are brought to their standard join page where you can pick a one day trial for 1$ but you can only download the most recent video.
-1/3 of each models video page is reserved for content available on their other 2 sites but you have to join those to see it.
-There are only 13 videos at the moment and they only uplaod a new video once a month except for the 10 that were available when they went online in late March early April.
-There is a little scenario where the boyfriend is pissed at the girl for whatever reason but most of the dialogue is in Russian and they didn't bother to put subtitles for us to know what they are saying.
-They offer bonus content but it's all leased material from other sites or movies.
-The join price is way too high for the current content. |
| Bottom Line: |
The only reason I joined this site was because TBP claimed you got access to 2 other sites with one membership. There's no way I'd have paid 30 dollars for only 13 videos. Whats worse is that the people responsible for this site have a notice at the bottom of the members section that reads: "Don't Forget. Access to this site gives you bonus access to the following sites". Of course if you click on either link then you will get the options mentioned in the Cons.
-You can see that this site has potential but it's difficult to recommend to anyone because there is not enough content available and at the rate of one video per month then you will only have 31 videos by the end of 2012. |
|
06-19-11 08:05pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
168
|
Real Tampa Swingers
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating. |
| Cons: |
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me. |
|
08-06-11 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
Reality Kings
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Over 7500 scenes to chose from.
+They have an excellent mix of North American, South American and European performers.
+They have over 500 interacial scenes and over 1100 lesbian scenes.
+They do an excellent job of tagging all their scenes so it's easy to search using keywords.
+All the videos from 2006 to now can be dowloaded in WMV and MP4 and the resolution is at least 768x432.
+All videos starting in late 2010 are now also available in MP4 1080p HD.
+They update with about 10 new videos per week and all content is dated
+The main pages aren't clutered with a lot of third party advertising. |
| Cons: |
-The most annoying thing about this site is that you only see the performers full name on the main page. So if you do a search by keyword then all you see is the models first name which isn't always correctly spelled.
-They do a lot of scenario porn but a lot of it is not as well done as it I'd like it to be.
-The content from sometime in 2004 and before is only available in multiple clips.
-The resolution for most of the videos may be 768x432 but the quality for the videos made from 2008 and before is average at best.
-Their preview section is one of the worst one for this type of site. |
| Bottom Line: |
**This is the top rated reality porn site and I can see why it is. They try to hit almost every type of porn and they to do a pretty decent job with most of them. They have a few faults but these are rather minor and are probably not much of an issue for most people.
*If you have been a member of Naughty America, Mofos, Brazzer or bangbros than you know what to expect since tese guys offer about the same type of content. The most obvious difference seems to be in the selection of models. Most sites prefer to stick with models from one or two Countries but these guys try to cover the whole world. They have over 900 scenes with European models, 350 scenes with Brazilian models and so many more with American models of different nationality. The only ethnic group not really represented are Asians.
*Their choice of models is a slight problem for me because I'm not generally a fan of Brazilain models or Brazilian porn so that's 350 less porn scene for me. Then there are the 900 Europeans scenes. They are for the most part good but I've been a member of so many great European sites that I already have many similar scenes starring these same girls so that means that I didn't really bother downloading most of their videos.
*The only thing that I wouldn't mind seeing is an improvement in the acting for the scenario driven scenes. The other sites do a much better job. The other improvment is in making sure that the models full name is visble on every screen so that you don't have to check out a different page to see if it's the correct model.
**If you have tried the other sites like this one then you have to try this one because there is so much content that you are bound to get your money's worth. |
|
10-25-12 06:29pm
Replies (11)
|
Review
170
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+There are 64 videos which can be downloaded in WMV.
+There are 94 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+CCbill is the CC processor. |
| Cons: |
-The videos all fall under bad with crappy 320x240 resolution, bad camera angles, bad lighting, and even a few out of focus shots.
-All the phototsets are 640x480 resolution.
-I'm pretty sure the content is identical to the one found on mandingogirl.
-There is very little info about the videos or phototsets so you have to open the file to find out what you'll get.
-They are still updating with new content but quality is so bad that I'd be willing to bet that it's just recylced content from years ago. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Dawn is not your typical bone thin young woman but is instead a pretty chubby all natural red head woman who has a southern accent and likes enjoy having sex with multiple partners at the same time. She seems to favor IR perfromers.
*This site could have been something good but the videos are so bad that tube sites wouldn' bother using them. There is no reason for anyone else to get taken in by their less than honest preview. Videos in 320x240 resolution should not exist today and any site that offers only this type of resolution should close shop right now instead of stealing money from fools like me.
**I'll post a comment about mandingogirl as well because I suspect that they share content or may even have the exact same content. I can't be 100% sure and I'm not joining them to find out. One bad decision is enough for me. Neddless to say avoid mandingogirl because it's not going to be any better than this one** |
|
08-25-11 06:33pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
171
|
Retro Raw
(0)
57.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get access to 139 movies from the 70's and 80's
-They have movies with some of the big names from those eras.
-Movies are broken in scenes that can be downloaded in WMV(low & high quality). |
| Cons: |
-No money was spent on restoring or remastering any of the movies so video quality is usually bad to awful.
-They have a couple of classic movies but the overall selection leaves a lot to be desired.
-No search option.
-No scene identification.
-No photos except for the front and back artwork for each movie.
-Content is not dated but based on TBP's last review then they have added about 7 movies since December 2010.
-You can download the scenes in low or high quality but the high quality is so bad that I can't see anyone downloading the low one. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I got access to this site because of an amazing offer I received on the weekend so I'm able to review without complaining about the price but I don't think this site is worth $20$.
-This is the type of site that could appeal to anyone who enjoys porn from the golden days but since the people behind it can't be bothered with offering a quality site then stay away. If you don't then you will regret it. I love these type of movies but after downloading a couple of scene and suffering through them then I deleted them and I'm not going to bother downloading any others. |
|
04-11-11 07:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
172
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Roxy is at the top of the list for extreme anal queen of the US.
+She has 86 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and you get low or high quality(resolution for HQ is 960x540)
+There are 56 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. (Resolution is 800x1200).
+They update every day or two and content is all dated.
+You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-There is a lack of variety in the different types of videos shoots because over 50 of them are of Roxy inserting various objects in her ass.
-She loves the extreme side of anal so you see her rosebud quite often.
-All the phototsets are from the video shoots so nothing extra. |
| Bottom Line: |
*Roxy is a such a cute girl that it's hard to believe that she's into extreme anal insertion. That's the good news for me. The bad one is that she's a little too extreme for my taste. I love seeing anal but seeing a girl try to push different size objetcs out of her is interesting but not necessarily sexually stimulating. Then there is the appearance of her rosebud in some of the videos and that's a major problem for me. I can't look at a girls rosebud. I'm glad that they seem to have no problem playing with it and don't seem to have any health issues but I still don't want to see it.
**This is a decent site for anyone looking for a girl that's into pushing different objhects out of her anal cavity and enjoy doing it. I really belive that Roxy loves this. Since m,any of the other sites have similar content than that's also a plus.**
***This site and most of the other whithin the network should be avoided by anyone who's not into extreme porn. Otherwise you will be very disapointed by the content***. |
|
08-04-11 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
173
|
Sara Jay
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Sara Jay is a large breasted blond pornstar in her early 30's who loves to have sex and doesn't mind being filmed doing it.
-There are more than 275 videos which are broken down in different categories like hardcore, G/G, Interracial, solo and a couple of other as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV 640x480 2735 kbps, MP4 these come in a couple of possible resolution but it can be as low as 400x300 1211 kbps and the Quicktime videos are 500x282 925 kbps.
-There are over 275 photosets and these can be downloaded as complete zip file. The number of pics per set and resolution varies from set to set.
-Site updates with new content every week.
-You get fee access to the networks cam shows and they post the time and date that shows are happening.
-Sara post her club appearances in the different US cities
-You can view all her Twitter post and she seems to love Twitter.
-You get access to 7 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-Although the videos come in 3 different formats.
They all suffer from average quality when viewed full screen. It's more noticeable on some videos.
-Far too many of the videos are broken parts of a complete scene. I would understand if the scenes were very long but most of them are 30 minutes scenes.
-Content is dated but that date is misleading since TBP says the site was launched in 2006 and the oldest video or photoset has a 2009 date. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Here is a solo model site that does almost everything right from offering multiple video formats to allowing members to download photos as complete sets. Posting a schedule of her club appearances is a good idea since it allows her fans the chance to possibly meet her at one of those locations.
-The biggest issue for me is video quality since I'm a mostly video guy. They should consider remastering the videos to improve the quality.
-If you are a fan of sara than you can't pass up this opportunity.
-If you aren't into interracial content then avoid because she really enjoys that kind of sex whether B/G or G/G. |
|
07-18-11 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
Review
174
|
Score HD
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have a loyalty program where you get access to one extra site each month that you remain a member.
+They truly have a wide variety of different body type models.
+A huge collection of older women models.
+Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV and basic resolution is 640x360.
+They also offer videos in the 1280x720 resolution.
+You can download all the photosets of each video in a single zip file and resolution is 1280x720.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with 6 new videos per week. |
| Cons: |
-There's a preview video that automatically starts each time you go to that videos download section.
-There are no tags on the videos so you actually have to search through each one to find what you are looking for.
-Many of the models may not be what you are into.
-They offer two extra sites with your membership but these aren't necessarily all that good.
**-It's possible to see what each model has on the other Score sites but since this is the only site where you can download all the content then that's not necessarily a good thing. |
| Bottom Line: |
**I got badly burned when I joined 40something because they implemented their policy of only allowing downloads of only their most recent updates after TBP had done their review so I was pleasantly surpried when I saw that this site offers almost every video I wanted from that site and a lot more. It's not perfect by far but you at least don't have any surpsise when you join this Score site.
*I'm pretty choosy about what I download and I still managed to find some amazing videos that were well worth the membership. The only warning I might give someone is that you should definetely check out all the models prior to joining because they do have a wide variety of models. You have some cute teens all the way to women in their late 40's and probably a couple in their 50's. There is also an abundance of BBW so if this is your thing than you'll have plenty to be happy about. On the downside. If you prefer women under the age of 30 and who are more on the slim side then this may not be your site of choice. Also anyone looking for more softcore or midcore stuff may want to steer clear as there is very little to be found here.
**The site could really use the addition of tags on their videos. It took me a long time to find what I wanted to download because I had to search through each model's video page. A nice search by keyword would really be appreciated by most members.
**It would also be really great if they offered the 50plus and 60plus content. As it is. You can see which models go on to shoot for those sites but yoiu have to join those sites knowing that only a tiny percentage of their content will be downloadable.
**They also don't necessarily add all of the content from their listed sites so while you do get a large amount. You don't get it all so it's very important to check this site's content before joining or you could be in for a surprise. |
|
11-10-12 11:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
175
|
Score Videos
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week. |
| Cons: |
-None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.
*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.
*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.
**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?** |
|
11-18-12 07:26am
Replies (3)
|
