Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Wide variety of attractive ladies
- Network access to other sites, they are all in the massage niche
- Camerawork and lighting are generally good
- The video quality is good, I mostly downloaded the middle level quality mp4 (960x544 ~2000 kbps total) which was usually around ~300 MB for a scene, and crisp enough for me. There are higher quality options (1280x720 5000 kbps) certainly looks nicer, but I am running low on space these days, so I only used that for scenes I really liked
- Reasonably diverse collection of models body types and ages
- Scenes are generally interesting and fun, the performers usually look like they are having a good time
- Download managers work (DTA), I did not experience any site timeouts (but there may be one), download speeds were acceptable
- Good price with TBP discount
- Pretty large network of sites
- They have user requested fantasies, not sure how legit this is, but interesting nonetheless |
| Cons: |
- Ethnic diversity is somewhat lacking
- Personal preference, but some of the sites are kind of odd, I don't really get the milking table thing, and some of the scenes on Nuru Massage are bordering on comical (they use a lot of lube)
- Not fond of the internal billing by "fame assist", would rather a more reputable biller, but did not have any problems with joining or cancelling |
| Bottom Line: |
I am not really sure why I joined this site, I guess I was in a weird mood. Probably saw some interesting scenes of models I like, but I don't really remember my logic, must have been drunk and liked the price. I don't honestly typically like massage porn, but I must say I was pleasantly surprised. There are plenty of very attractive models at this site, the camerawork is generally pretty good (not too many close ups, framing shots well, not moving around too much), and the lighting is also very good.
The scenes generally revolve around the same basic concept with only slight deviations regardless except for the two sites I talk about below. Someone shows up for massage, results in some type of sex (sometimes just oral), customer leaves happy.
Although I didn't download many of the scenes, the milking table site has a slightly different setup, men seeking help with erectile or performance problems solve them through this service. Interesting alternative to Viagra I guess, but I had never really heard of this niche/kink before, didn't really do it for me, but if you are into that, it seemed pretty well done. Scenes on that site generally involve a girl giving head to a guy through a hole in the massage table to help him with his "sexual" problem, sometimes followed by intercourse.
The other site that was kind of weird was Nuru massage. Not really my scene, for some reason I find an excess of lube kind of disgusting, and some of these scenes are like 55 gallon drum of lube on Amazon excessive. To me they are often bordering on comical, like two people trying to have sex on a lubed up slip 'n slide. But again, it was well produced, so if this is your thing, seems like a good place to get it.
Overall I was pretty surprised I liked this site as much as I did, I wish they used a 3rd party biller and had a bit more diversity. But they certainly seem to do what they do well, if you are into this niche, it is certainly worth a look. |
|
01-10-17 01:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Fuck Studies
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decennt video quality, most I downloaded were 1280x720, 5000 kbps, reasonably crisp.
-Okay download speeds, maxed at over 1MB/sec
-Attractive young ladies
-Good bonus content, although the score I am giving here is for this site alone
-Multiple file formats, although best quality only in WMV (flash, wmv, mp4 (for mobile) and 3gp (for mobile, never heard of this)
-Download managers work
-Logins don't time out, no capcha.
-Reasonable price, given bonus content
-Zip downloads of photos, decent quality 1000x1400 typical |
| Cons: |
-Small site, only 35 scenes at time of review
-Slowish updates, about 3 per month for the past month. Although the network updates at more like 10 a month from the looks of things.
-Camerawork can be a bit sketchy
-Navigation of the site and network are still pretty bad, although it is improving. The seem to have fixed some of the model name problems they used to have.
-Adds for other sites are throughout, kind of annoying.
-There are some navigation glitches (adds covering up thumbs and such). |
| Bottom Line: |
Joined this site, as I guess it was added after the last time I was a member of this network of sites (teensexmania, teenstarsonly, atmovs, etc.). I wasn't sure if this site was a part of the 19.95 deal for joining teensexmania as it is not listed as a bonus, so joined it directly - although it probably is included, I didn't feel like taking the chance.
The ladies are attractive, and the theme of the site is loosly teacher based, although I'd say it is primarily a gonzo site. All of the models listed do hardcore material, with about half doing anal. The scenes are for the most part pretty good, on par or better than most of these newbie euro sites.
If you haven't been a member of this network of sites, it is definitely worth joining, although I'd probably join through teensexmania and get the discount, if this site isn't one of the bonus sites you get, it isn't much of a loss. If you have been a member of this network before, I wouldn't say this site is reason enough to join.
Assuming this site is part of the network, see my review of teensexmania for my opinions on the network as a whole, although I wrote that 6 months ago, the info still applies.
I joined this site primarily cause I was bored, hadn't joined a site in a while and they have a few models I liked so I figured what the hell.
The site itself is pretty good, and I still think the network is great. I wish they would spend a little more time fixing some of the navigation issues (adding search, indexing the models, etc.), especially since the network is getting pretty large, 736 scenes at the time of this review.
Billed through segpay (I find to be the most suspect of the billers - I used a card on one of their sites and somehow the card number was stolen, I just sort of assumed it is because of them, but can't be sure) - used a virtual card this time...
Definitely worth joining if you are a fan of natural, thin, euro ladies - especially if you haven't joined the network before. However, if you are a fan of plots, large breasted women, or pictures, you are best served looking elsewhere. Also, if your internet connection isn't very good, you could certainly get frustrated, the typical scene on the network is between 500 MB and 1 GB. |
|
07-02-10 10:05pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some very attractive models
-I can't recall having seen any of these models elsewhere
-Download managers work (DTA)
-Good download speeds (2MB/s)
-I like the concept
-Reputable biller (I had CCBill)
-Long site timeouts, it doesn't appear to ever timeout
-Few if any fake breasts |
| Cons: |
-Camerawork is not the best
-Lighting is not the best
-Scenes are repetitive, almost all progress in the same fashion
-Navigation is very basic, just a page with 6 scenes on it, many scenes aren't even really labelled (no model names?!)
-Site is sort of small for the price (200 scenes at the time of review)
-Video encoding on many scenes is poor (see BL)
-HD only available after 30 days, a stupid gimmick given the size/update rate of the site
-They say one update per week, seems right for as long as I have been a member, but since scenes aren't dated it is hard to tell
-No photos
-Some videos are zipped, is this 2001? Zip a wmv all you want, you ain't saving any space.
-Some odd stuff in a few of the videos (showing a girl go buy Plan B)
-No bonus material
-Streaming starts instantly when you go to a page (to all webmasters: please stop doing this) |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the idea of this site, and it is nice to see some new faces, but I will admit I joined primarily due to the Miss Teen Delaware thing intriguing me enough to give it a look. Generally I think the models are attractive. Typically athletic, skinny, and generally on the smaller breasted side - no fake breasts that I could tell. My type of woman, so I figured 'what the hell' and joined.
The main negative for me with the site is the camerawork, lots of stationary shots as though it were filmed on a tripod, and shots I am not particularly fond of (long stretches of showing cowgirl from behind, which an ass man might appreciate I suppose, but I find it boring and a poor angle choice). The lighting can be a bit iffy at times, but they do appear to have put in some effort by bringing in some of their own lighting gear as seen in many of the shots, but all scenes are shot in a hotel room, so obviously not the best.
My second main gripe is the video encoding on this site, encoding a video that is filmed in 16:9 in 4:3 is unacceptable, and it hasn't been for several years. Basically forces you to have black bars on all sides. On widescreen monitors this will leave half or so of your screen as black space. This is particularly egregious since it is FILMED in 16:9. My only guess for why anyone would do this is that it was easier for them to do with their 30 days for HD policy. Perhaps these videos are encoded properly if you hang around for this period, but given their update schedule that is a tough pill to swallow. I used avidemux to crop the videos properly, but this is not something one should have to do at a pay site.
The scenes themselves are very repetitive, generally an interview, fully clothed oral, fully clothed doggy, naked cowgirl or reverse cowgirl, doggy, end. I have no idea why they spend so long on almost every film showing the girl from behind when she is on top, I prefer to see the girl not her back.
Overall, I think the site is a good concept, with some quite attractive original women, but the execution is too poor for me to recommend it. If they got rid of their HD policy, filmed scenes better, encoded the videos properly, and updated their navigation to at least include model names it would be a step in the right direction. |
|
03-08-13 11:31pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
29
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good site
Good photo quality, and good quality photos
Hanna is one of my favorites, so it is good to me
All photo sets are zipped
Navigation is good |
| Cons: |
Content is limited to mostly solo and some girl/girl
The content is all pretty similar, no real need to download 100 only slightly varying solo scenes (different outfits, haircuts, etc) |
| Bottom Line: |
I got a membership to this site as a bonus for joining onlycuties. It is a pretty good site, but I wouldn't see a reason to join just this site. No boy/girl action if that is your thing. |
|
03-30-09 08:45pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
30
|
Hardcore Partying
(0)
63.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some good content
Lots of bonus sites
Easy to cancel (this is about the only thing they did right, which is good cause the site does so much wrong) |
| Cons: |
Aweful navigation
No model listing at all
Site is slow
Videos are split into many files (usually 7 or 8)
DRM on most videos
Video quality is poor to average on most videos
Expensive (the discount price listed here is wrong, it was $28 when I joined)
Limited photos
Dead links, or pages never load |
| Bottom Line: |
As you can tell, I was not fond of this site. While I found the concept intriguing the execution is terrible. In my opinion the entire spicetv network of sites should never be joined until they resolve their many issues. Some of the content is good, and some of the women are quite attractive, but all the navigation problems (particulary no single-file download and DRM) make the site next to worthless. I would recommend looking elsewhere for your porn needs. The fact that I listed "ease of cancellation" as I couldn't really think of any other good points of the site is evidence enough that you shouldn't join. |
|
03-21-09 11:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Huge archive of videos
-Many videos actually have stories, albeit most are pretty stupid, it is nice to see this amongst all the drop your pants and fuck kind of sites.
-Many attractive women
-Pretty good download speeds, although somewhat variable given time of day (1MB/sec max, 700KB/sec average)
-Download managers work
-Pictures are pretty decent quality, newer photos are about 1500x1000
-No DRM anymore
-Access to barelylegal.com as well, although a lot of the content on barelylegal is also on Hustler.
-Good quality photography and videography
-Good price with TBP discount |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is mediocre. You can sort by star, dvd title, and other things, but with an archive this large it would be nice to have more sorting options and a search ability.
-Navigating for photosets is particularly annoying, very difficult to just browse.
-Video quality is mediocre to poor. The best I downloaded was 640x360 1700kbps. They even commically call some of the videos of this ilk "HD".
-Video quality for older DVDs is poor, as low as 700kbps in highest quality.
-No zips for photosets
-While download managers work, they can be a bit glitchy as the path to files change, so you can only really queue up a few files
-Some videos aren't available for download, most are, it seemed like most of the videos that couldn't be downloaded were newer additions
-Some videos were a bit glitchy - 2 scenes in one, the ending missing, etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this site gets somewhat of a bad rap, as historically it was a horrible site with streaming only options and terrible navigation. I think it is much better now than it was in the past (even though the only change I noticed was getting rid of DRM). Maybe I just have a soft spot for Hustler since the first DVDs I ever bought were Barely Legal DVDs.
If they improved the video quality, added some better navigation, and provided zip downloads of photosets this would probably be one of my highest rated sites.
The archive is quite large, 830 DVDs on Hustler, and 346 on barelylegal. Even with some overlap, that is a nice sized archive.
I particularly enjoy the style of many of Hustler's videos and enjoy that many of them have a story - which seems less and less common these days. They appear to also have a large magazine archive, although I didn't have the patience to sort through it.
I would definitely recommend the site for a month, especially for $20/month. Even with the mediocre video quality, I still enjoy a lot of the scenes I downloaded here more than HD content on other sites. I'd be surprised if anyone couldn't find some material they like on this site. However, if you are a fan of photos, this probably isn't the best site to join. |
|
02-18-10 08:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive eastern euro women
-Download managers work, I haven't experienced any idle time-outs
-Good download speeds, I've been getting over 1 MB/sec avg.
-Decent sized site when you include the "bonus" sites, although most of the content can be accessed any of main the sites. 348 total models, it is difficult to tell how many scenes, between 1-6 scenes per model from what I have seen.
-Zip downloads of photosets, although this is primarily a video site
-Small or no watermarks
-I didn't see any obvious fake breasts, yay!
-Videos can be downloaded in parts (many many parts, two sizes) or a single file (only one size available)
-Most of their content appears exclusive, or at least I haven't seen it anywhere. |
| Cons: |
-Mediocre video quality on newer material, 832x468, 2300 kbps high end. Worst I downloaded was 520x416 1400 kbps. None of the videos are very crisp
-Poor camerawork is common
-Photo quality is poor to mediocre, 800x1200. Some scenes appear to be screenshot only.
-A bit pricy
-Poor navigation, although it has improved over the last time I joined this network. There is a model list that can be sorted by name/date/rating but no search function
-There were a few dead links
-Some sites no longer updating
-WMV and streaming are the only formats available |
| Bottom Line: |
Rather than try to review all the sites on this network, I will just post this and hope most of the people find it. Hopefully in the future this network will establish a main site ala 21sextury or DDF - certainly would make reviews easier.
This network of sites has definitely improved over the last time I was a member, the navigation is significantly better (it has gone from god-aweful to poor). Perhaps worth considering if you are into young eastern euro models.
There are 28 bonus sites that are included with this site. some of which are:
Trickyoldteacher (HC, old/young); Spoiledvirgins (HC); 18virginsex (HC); Amourbabes (Solo); youngpornhomevideo (Amateur); Drilledmouths (BJ); younglesbiansportal; creampiedsweeties (HC); Dirtyass2mouth (anal)
Some of the bonus sites appear to be original content, others clearly are not. The only sites that appear to be currently updating are 18virginsex, trickyoldteacher, ifuckedherfinally, and spoiledvirgins.
As I said earlier they have integrated most of their content onto a single site (accesesible from the models tab on any of their sites), so you no longer have to keep browsing all the bonus sites. I am not entirely sure that all of their content is listed under the models list.
The content itself on the network is pretty variable, but I would say most of it is gonzo-style content. Some of the sites try to add some plot to the scenes, although since few are in english, it is pretty pointless (for me).
Didn't have any experience with customer service, billed through Epoch for me, no forum or anything of that nature, although you can add feedback on the sets (and rate them).
If you are into young natural women, this site might be one to consider. Hopefully they continue to improve - especially in the navigation/video quality/camerawork departments. They certainly find some attractive women, if only they could present them a little better. |
|
05-12-10 07:43pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
33
|
Idols 69
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*Pretty large collection, about 450 photos sets (typically around 100 pics/set), 600 uncensored videos, 800 total videos
*The site also lists 360 or so dvds, but I believe these are where most of the videos listed come from.
*Beautiful japanese women
*Zip downloads of photos
*Decent quality photos, 1200x800, pretty good photography
*Good quality videos, 720x480 2000kbps was the best I saw
*Good download speeds, I got over 800 k/s
*Download managers work |
| Cons: |
*Some videos are censored, like most Japanese AV sites the hottest models tend to be censored
*Photos are softcore, not usually censored, but photographed to only show bush
*Like all Japanese porn, some of the content is a little odd
*Poor navigation |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this is a pretty good site, similar content-wise to JSexNetwork, although has more uncensored videos and has zips of all photo sets. I think JSexNetwork had slightly better photos, although they didn't have zips of most of their sets.
The site comes with four bonus sites:
*Puuko - an anime site, barely has any content
*analnippon - a video site with about 550 videos, mostly uncensored, obviously mostly anal - but often just with toys. Seems like a decent site, although anal isn't really my cup of tea so I didn't look around too much
*ocreampies - a video site with 600 uncensored videos mainly focused on cum related sex activities; creampie, bondage, bukkake mostly.
*bigtitstokyo - 250 videos big tits and large japanese women, looked uncensored but didn't look too much at this site
I am a big fan of asian ladies, and I think this site has a lot to offer. I find the quality of the photography on sites like these to be much more erotic than a lot of other (American/Euro) sites these days. I would recommend joining if you are a fan of Japanese porn. Just be aware, they always show the most attractive ladies in previews - and many of them only do softcore or edited content. |
|
02-03-10 06:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
J Sex Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent selection of beautiful women
Good variety of videos and photos
Photos are good resolution
Videos are good quality
Most photos seem exclusive, videos are all from DVDs some of which are available on other sites
Good connection |
| Cons: |
The mosaic is a little annoying, especially on older material. Though some of it is uncensored
Videos cannot be downloaded by scene, must download entire dvd which can be quite large (500MB-1GB)
Site organization is a bit frustrating, especially if you just want to browse and aren't searching for specific women
Japanese porn can be a bit odd. This was my first experience with Japanese porn and some of it was a bit off-putting.
Most of the photo series are not zipped |
| Bottom Line: |
Worth joining if you are into Japanese women, certainly if you are mostly interested in soft-core type photos. If you are planning on downloading videos, you should be prepared with a great connection and note that there is a download limit.
Without a doubt some of the most beautiful women you will find, if Japanese women are your thing. |
|
03-04-09 07:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Jordan Capri
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some newer videos are much higher quality, the newer stuff is typically 720x480 (1800 kbps) with some stuff that is 1280x720 (5400 kbps)
Jordan has always been one of my favorites, although I don't find her quite as cute as I used to.
There are plenty of cute girls
Download speed is pretty good
My download manager worked for the photo sets, but not the video set. Could be a problem with my settings.
All exlusive content, I think. Including exlusive models. |
| Cons: |
Very few updates, I believe they did a couple of newer scenes with Jordan in 2008, but the vast majority of content on Jordan's site is much older (2003 or earlier)
Expensive
None of the other Lightspeed Network sites appear to be updating anymore. The "New" sets of Nella and Belicia were clearly from the early 2000s.
Still cylcles sets as "new updates" when they clearly aren't. Supposedly this is to keep it fresh, but I find this dishonest. The sites are just floating on all the old content they collected years ago.
Navigation is terrible.
Photo quality is typically mediocre, especially the older sets. New stuff is 2000x1400, older stuff is 800x600.
Camerawork in both the photo and video sets is pretty crappy. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this was the first pay site I ever joined, and the women on the site are attractive. I had heard there were recent sets of Jordan added last year, so I figured it was worth a look. I was a bit dissappointed at the quantity of newer sets, however the quality is better.
Maybe worth joining for a month if you have never joined this site before and are into Tawnee Stone or Jordan Capri or several pretty popular euro models from the early aughts (Nella, Veronika J, Belicia) when they were younger.
Almost entirely softcore solo and "soft" lesbian, the euro models all have some toy action as well.
I probably would have given this site a lower score, but a lot of the sets I have from this site - even with the crappy quality - still rank amongst my favorites. |
|
01-25-10 03:21pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
36
|
Joy Mii
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good quality videos from a technical perspective
-Lighting is typically good
-Many attractive, mostly eastern euro women
-Videos tend to be shorter, and smaller (may be a negative to some)
-The action is generally pretty good
-Download speeds are excellent
-Download managers work (DTA)
-Reputable biller (CCBill)
-No ads on any of the main pages or model pages |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is annoying, not sure why they use a random screenshot for the model profile pic instead of a headshot (sometimes it is like their leg)
-Camerwork is pretty odd, feels like they are trying too hard. You aren't trying to win an Oscar for cinematography, you are making porn
-Lots of weird pans and zooms, weird ways of framing shots, hang too long in certain areas, odd editing
-Not a super large site, ~600 videos
-Updates seem kind of random, 2 or 3 a week (total including videos and photos) |
| Bottom Line: |
One of many glamcore sites these days, for some reason the last one I ever joined. Not really sure why, just never got around to it. Personally, I think X-Art, Wow/AllFineGirls do a better job, and probably give you more value. Not the type of site you should join if you are looking for harder content, there is hardcore, but it is typically much softer than most sites, very little anal, very few facials, more just relatively natural sex.
I kind of liked this site, I think it has the potential to be pretty good, there are just some weird things they do. The main issue I have is the camerawork, it is almost always panning or zooming somewhere. There is nothing wrong with just framing the action and sitting there. There certainly are some attractive women, and they do a good job with lighting and picking scenes and outfits. For me, they just kill it all with shitty camerawork. It is kind of hard to explain the problem, best I can say is imagine you are getting into a scene it looks nice and all of a sudden the camera guy just starts randomly zooming and panning all over the place, just distracting and you end up skipping around the scenes too much.
Other than that main complaint, the regular photography is very nice, the models are definitely attractive, although not very diverse in build or ethnicity. Maybe worth joining if you have already tried the other, better sites in this genre, but given the update rate and relatively small site, I doubt you will stick around for long. |
|
03-20-17 11:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
37
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
85.0
|
No Review.
|
10-24-09 02:25pm
|
Review
38
|
Mofos Network
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive content
-Decent sized site, 810 videos at time of review
-Download managers work
-Decent download speeds (maxed my connection at 1.8 MB/s)
-Reasonable variety of ethnicities, mostly hardcore but some solo
-Zip downloads of photo sets
-Some attractive ladies
-Decent price, although some are cheaper
-Large DVD site as bonus
-No DRM
-No download limit that I ever ran into
-Video technical quality is good
-Comments section and scene ratings
-Navigation of main site is pretty good
-Decent update schedule, 9 per week or so |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross sell
-Camerawork is some of the worst I have seen anywhere. I've seen home videos shot by 12-year olds that are better shot. Commonly out of focus, odd angles, zoomed at bad times, poorly edited, obstructions, etc.
-Too many tats, fake breasts, typical American porn network
-Bonus content is nice, but navigation of bonus content is poor, and a small amount didn't appear downloadable
-Ads, lots of ads, other sites listed at top of page, a worthless offer to a lifetime membership to Brazzers pops up everytime you log in (only valid for as long as you area member at mofos). |
| Bottom Line: |
Maybe I'm just tired of "American" porn these days, or perhaps I'm just pissed off that for the first time I missed the pre-checked cross sale, but I was not impressed with this place at all. I had always thought about joining here, but assumed it would be far too similar to BangBros and Reality Kings, which it unfortunately is. Some may like this style of porn, but I guess it just isn't for me. There are some decent aspects to the site, and I like the idea of a few of the network sites, but the execution is pretty hit-or-miss.
The camerawork at this place is astoundingly poor, I know they are trying to be an 'amateur' site, but that doesn't mean they can't hire a guy that can hold the fucking camera still (and keep it in focus). At times it really seems like the dude has ADHD or something. Also, the running commentary is a bit of a nuisance. They seem like they are trying to be the BangBros, in my opinion they would be much better off trying to be someone (anyone) else.
They do have some attractive ladies here, and those that are fans of fake breasts and lots of tattoos might really enjoy this site. I will grant that a lot of my opinions on this site are quite subjective, so some might really enjoy it, but if your tastes are anything like mine, you likely will not.
They have interesting sites, and interesting concepts, I just wish the execution were a bit better. I guess I will just have to stick to euro sites from now on. |
|
01-16-12 11:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Rating
39
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
06-29-10 12:28am
|
Review
40
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive euro-teen models
-Decent sized collection, 244 models, 545 videos, 589 photo sets.
-Video quality is decent (best I saw was 1280x720 4000 kbps wmv, worst I saw was 720x480, 3000 kbps). Reasonably crisp, although not the best I've seen.
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although had some trouble with them with photosets.
-Decent navigation for a site like this, model index, model rating, and comments on scenes are available - although not always reliable
-Zip downloads of photo sets
-Decent photo quality
-Mostly hardcore, but good variety of solo and a few lesbian scenes mixed in
-Content is exclusive as best I can tell
-Bills through Epoch |
| Cons: |
-No real bonus content
-Expensive for what you get compared with some other sites
-Unreliable servers, download speeds are all over the place - 1 MB/sec one day, 200 KB/sec the next.
-Updates aren't very frequent, 7 photo sets and 7 video sets in the last month (photos and videos are usually the same scene)
-Camerawork is not the best |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I'd say this is a decent euro-teen site. The site is not very large, although the collection is pretty well sized. For those used to seeing a boatload of content with tons of bonus sites, they might find this site lacking. It could certainly use some improvement, and more consistent download speeds would be nice.
I primarily joined the site because I knew it had content by some models I liked, so I was reasonably pleased with what I got. However, as with most sites of this nature there are some drawbacks. Model quality is somewhat inconsistent, and while some of the scenes try to have a plot it is pretty much a gonzo site.
I think this site would be a lot better if paired with the other JTCash site as a bonus, or if they just merged the two sites into one as the content is similar and they have many of the same models.
As with this company's other site, some of the scenes are a little odd (a girl screwing some guy while her mother is sleeping at the table, overly long jerking at the end, etc), and some of the models, while attractive, look like they are doing their taxes rather than having sex.
This place is probably worth joining if you are a fan of some of the models they offer. There are definitely some decent scenes here. Of course there are also plenty of not so good scenes as seems typical of most of these smaller euro-teen sites. If they offered their other site as a bonus (or lowered the price), and increased their server capacity I would probably recommend this site a little more highly. |
|
09-15-10 12:51am
Replies (2)
|
Review
41
|
My Teen Video
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
There are some good videos, mostly hardcore but some softcore
There are several very attractive women
Seems to be exclusive content, haven't seen a bunch of these girls before
Server is pretty fast |
| Cons: |
Small site as of now, only about 64 women
Some of the videos are a little odd (long intro portions, the models are eastern european and none of the talking I heard was in english - several i saw had a guy just sort of standing around for the entire video)
Some videos are a bit large given the quality |
| Bottom Line: |
A reasonable site, probably only worth joining if you particularly like a girl shown on the preview pages (as that is pretty much all there is). Certainly not worth joining for more than a month |
|
03-02-09 06:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Naughty America
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very large collection, with a pretty wide of content
-A good number of attractive ladies
-Excellent price when I subscribed ($5), but the TBP price is still great
-I like that many of the sites have some type of setup, rather than straight gonzo
-No DRM
-No download limits that I encountered
-Download speeds typically good, I got 1.5MB/s using a download manager which is my connection max
-Download managers work (I used DTA), the most I could seem to get was two concurrent downloads, although there are some issues, see cons.
-Good navigation, scenes are tagged, there is a search function that works better than most sites I have used, as well as comments (which seem rarely used), favorites, and forum
-Network updates frequently, 15 times in the last week, 65 times in the last month
-Camerawork is generally good, at least compared to their American competitors, not as many lingering closeups, long shots of the guy’s face, etc
-Cont. in BL |
| Cons: |
-As others have said, too many fake/large breasts
-Ads on login are annoying
-Lower price for the first month with a vastly increased price thereafter, seems to punish those that want to stay around for a while (or take advantage of those that forgot to cancel)
-Though the tags are nice, and being able to sort through all the scenes using their ‘Porn Finder’, they are a bit overly ambitious with some tags (petite as far as I know doesn’t just mean short)
-Download mangers work, but they do file location shifting so if you queue up too much stuff you will get file location errors
-Older videos are poor quality, although they appear to be remastering some of this content |
| Bottom Line: |
Pros Cont.
-Scenes are generally well done, little abusive male talent, not much jibber-jabber from the cameraman, they do well in this area where so many other hardcore American sites fail miserably
BL:
Though I generally dislike American hardcore porn sites these days, I think this might be the best of the bunch. Where so many others fail in so many ways (aweful camerawork, horribly annoying male talent, iffy business practices), this one seems to do a fair bit better than average in all of these areas. I think for the price, it is definitely one worth joining for at least a month now and again if you are into hardcore porn.
This site is somewhat softer than some might like, so if you are looking for a harder edge (more anal, more abusive behavior), you are probably better off trying a different site. But, I would imagine most that are in to this type of videos would be reasonably satisfied with their purchase.
There are a few things the site could do better, as listed in the cons. I found the tagging to be highly inconsistent, listing women with C-D cups as small breasted, a few that I am pretty sure have fake breasts are ‘natural’ (although I’m no expert), and general misuse of some categories – which is annoying for someone who is a fan of small framed models and keeps getting large breasted results. It would perhaps be nice if you could select more than one category (for example petite and natural would have been greatly appreciated) or if you could select a “not” category.
I did not experience any of the dead links messmer mentioned, so perhaps this is resolved, or perhaps it is only in the MILF sections (see his reply to my review).
If you are interested in hardcore American porn, I would probably join this network over any of the other options (BangBros, RK, PornPros), as with all of those, I have gotten so frustrated that I just let my subscription lapse without returning after the first week. While there are some areas they could improve, like having a bit more user interaction on scenes, labeling better, removing some of the ads, I think it is generally the best of the American hardcore networks. |
|
01-20-13 10:59pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
43
|
Oldje
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor. |
| Cons: |
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent |
| Bottom Line: |
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...) |
|
11-06-10 12:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Only Cuties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very attractive women
Good quality photos
Good quality videos
Zip archives of all photosets
Good navigation
Site is categorized very well
Reasonably priced
Bonus site hanna's honeypot, good if you like that girl - as the whole site is her, with some lesbian stuff with other women |
| Cons: |
While video quality is good, the file sizes can be very large (make sure you have a big hard drive)
The site is not huge, the collection is good, but not nearly as large as a site like 1byday or twistys.
Site is not very fast, sometimes you can only download/load one file at a time
A minor issue, but the model names do not match the model names most other sites use |
| Bottom Line: |
Good site to join for a month. The content is mostly the eastern european models you probably have seen on other sites. I believe most of the content is exclusive, I haven't seen any of it before anywhere.
The updates are several times a week and the organization of the site is very good. I like the girl hanna, so that bonus site was particulary good for me, but I'm sure others wouldn't like her super-skinny style.
Most of the content is solo, but there is a decent amount of girl/girl and guy/girl action.
It would be nice if the site had more a full preview as other sites do, and increased speed would be nice. |
|
03-30-09 08:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Attractive ladies, I believe entirely european
-Good variety of material, sotfcore, lesbian, some hardcore
-Good download speeds, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Okay navigation. Model index, search function, scene ratings.
-Zip downloads of photo sets, in 3 sizes, 1200, 2000, 4000
-Good video quality from a technical standpoint (1920x1080 4000 kbps HD mp4, 960x540 3600 kbps SD wmv, 1280x720 4250 kbps HD wmv)
-Most videos available in 8 formats, wmv, mov, mp4, and flv. I mostly downloaded the mp4’s even though it is categorized under the “mobile” section
-Videography and photography generally pretty well done. Decent lighting, decent focus, good camerawork in my opinon
-I like the style of most of the material, pretty much a euro copy of X-Art.
-In browser streaming works well and buffering is minimal
-Respectable biller, I had CC-Bill
-No issues with billing, no pre-checked cross sales, or problems cancelling
-I believe it is 100% exclusive content |
| Cons: |
-No bonus content
-Update frequency somewhat slow: 7 videos and 6 photosets in June
-Small site, 161 videos, 71 photosets, 80 or so female models
-Some videos had odd playback problems, the wmv’s had buffering issues which I have never seen before, could be my computer I suppose
-More costly than their direct competitor
-Pop-ups on login
-No user interaction (comments, forum) |
| Bottom Line: |
For some reason this site is somewhat hard for me to rate. I feel like the content is pretty good, although it is more or less a direct copy of the style of X-Art (they originally even copied X-Art’s website layout), it is reasonably well executed, albeit I don’t think they did it as well as X-Art. Given that and the fact that it is a smaller site, has no bonus material, and is more expensive than this site, I feel I should score it a good bit lower, but I probably didn’t score X-Art as high as I should have given my current feelings towards that place.
I think they have some really good material, and I like these new sites that feature a more “erotic” style of porn, and this is definitely one of them. As for the material, you will see many of the typical, perhaps more popular, euro models you see these days, as well as somewhat humorously many of the euro models that X-Art uses. They have a decent mix of somewhat older models such as Zuzana Z, Piper Fawn, Eufrat and some new favorites of mine Pinky, Caprice, Ivy and Abby are all present, although amongst these only Ivy and Zuzana Z do hardcore if that is something you are looking for. Generally speaking I find most of the models to be ranging from attractive to beautiful, with the vast majority being quite lookers. Although the models are pretty much all white (one Asian), and generally the same body type – thin, athletic, and small breasted. For me the petite/small breasted part is a positive, but some more ethnic diversity would be nice.
I did not have any interaction with support, so I cannot comment on that.
It may be worth joining now if there are some models here you really like, but the site is rather small at this point so it I’d probably just wait a few months to see how it grows. The current breakdown as I counted is, Photos - Solo: 22, Les: 24, HC 25; Videos - Solo:13, Les: 60, HC: 49. With videos especially there seems to be some favoritism towards HC and Les, so if you are particularly into solo videos this is probably not the place to go.
Overall, I think this site is pretty good, decent videos, decent camerawork and photography. I am glad that there are more of these erotic porn sites showing up (even if they are copying each other), and I hope they continue to become more prevalent in the future. If this is the type of site you are interested, I would definitely recommend X-Art above this one, but it is worth considering if you have already been there. If you prefer solo material, broader ethnic diversity, or more gonzo-style porn, I’d probably look elsewhere. |
|
06-30-12 11:29pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
46
|
Orgy Max
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site has some good fetish content.
It looks like all (or at least most) of the content is original
Some very attractive women, doing some crazy shit |
| Cons: |
Too expensive
Navigation is bad, it is nice that they have the model directory, but it only lists some of the models.
The scenes are split into several pieces.
Some models listed as appearing in a scene (especially on the orgy sites) only appear in passing.
Download speeds aren't the best.
Video quality is okay (640x480) was the best I saw) and the files can get quite large |
| Bottom Line: |
Like my rating suggests, average site. If you have the time to dig through it all or have a specific fetish (clothed sex, for example) this might be a good site for you - but I'd look at all the sites first and make sure it is what you want). Some sites don't appear to update often, if at all. If it were a little cheaper and they greatly improved the navagation (put everything on one site, have a full model index) I would probably recommend it. |
|
12-01-09 06:21pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
47
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent number of models, hard to get an exact figure but pretty large collection
-No DRM on newer videos, appears to have started in 2009 as well, but only for some models
-Zip downloads of some of the newer photosets (seems like this started in 2009 for the most part)
-Some attractive ladies
-Download managers work, although there isn't much to download with them
-Good photography
-Decent price with TBP
-Navigation is acceptable although not the best
-Download speeds are decent, I got 1 MB/sec, although once again not much to download
-Newer streaming videos are decent quality |
| Cons: |
-Too many 'fake' women, although it is Playboy so what should one expect...
-Difficult to tell which of the many sites you are getting when you join
-Click on links to models and get directed to content you don't have access to
-Video quality is sub-par, 840x480 2900 kbps is the best I have seen, and it isn't well encoded for the downloadable videos
-Photo quality is mediocre, typically 1600 long-end.
-Prechecked cross sell
-Too many adds, up-sells, and other junk on the site
-It just takes to much time to go through it all, I doubt I will |
| Bottom Line: |
To be fair, this site is pretty much what I expected, and what most people should. Overly made up, often fake breasted women in softcore photoshoots. I wish there were a greater variety of body types, but it is Playboy after all.
Given that, it isn't a terrible site, but I probably wont be joining it again unless they make it all inclusive, make all videos downloadable, and increase their video and photo specs significantly.
The main reason I joined was someone told me there was a local girl who had posed for them, which would have been interesting, but I couldn't find her, and I was in the mood for some softcore material. Probably should have just joined MetArt again or something, but oh well.
It is hard for me to be too harsh with this place, because I was well aware of this companies faults, and pretty much expected what I got, although for some reason I thought the TV stuff was included with the subscription, but I guess it isn't. Or at least I can't find it, not that I would watch it much anyways.
Probably an okay place to join if you are into the not-so-endangered large breasted american blonde and very soft softcore, but it is definitely hard to recommend. |
|
03-18-11 01:22am
Replies (2)
|
Review
48
|
Private.com
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Since I keep getting responses to my comment, I figured I'd go ahead and write a review. Hopefully this answers everybody's questions.
-Good size archive, almost 500 downloadable DVDs, 1160 zipped photosets, 200 downloadable full magazines.
-Partial magazine archive, most of which is downloadable in PDF format which is excellent quality. I'm not really sure "quantify" good quality for a pdf, but they appear to be digital prints of the magazines, not scans.
-Decent download speeds, I almost maxed out my connection - 1.4 MB/sec in Eastern USA
-Downloadable zips of photosets and magazines
-Video quality is acceptable 640x480 1500 kbps on high
-No DRM
-Photo quality okay, 1200x800 for the newer stuff 600x400 for the older stuff
-Good price with TBP discount |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is downright aweful. If the navagation was similar to what is shown in the preview the site would be much better. I ended up keeping a window of the preview open so I could figure out which videos had which stars in them.
-Have a search function, but it is basically worthless unless you know the title name you are looking for
-Even when you find the DVD you are looking for, the thumbnail previews of the scenes are so small you can't tell who is in it. They don't even list who stars in the DVD or scene when you get to the DVD page.
-Download managers do not work
-Content not exclusive, many Private DVDs are available on sites like Videobox.
-It just takes too much time to sort through it all, I gave up and moved on |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this site is the perfect example of a site that could be great with some major fixes to navigation and setup. Based on the amount of Pros I listed, you may think my score is far too low, but sites like this just piss me off. They certainly have some great content, and if you have the time you can find it - but why have the preview area show reasonably good navigation and then when you join the site it is terrible? I kept thinking there must be something I'm missing, like you have to click somewhere to go back to a "home page" or something. I can't stand sites that use this type of "bait and switch" tactics. Navigation, especially with a site this large, is pretty much THE MOST important thing.
Based on the stuff I found, if they fixed the navigation issues, added much larger thumbnails and scene previews, this site certainly could be excellent.
Even if they say they fix the navigation problems (see the Webmaster's reply to my comment) I would be hesitant to join again. Thus, it would be hard for me to recommend to anyone unless they have boatloads of free time.
Sorry if my Bottom Line sounded more like a rant, but content providers need to learn not to mislead customers. |
|
02-10-10 01:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
49
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Decent Download speeds
-Download managers work
-Some of the girls are attractive |
| Cons: |
-Small collection, some of which appears to be from another site - jailbaitvideos - and these videos are particularly sketchy as some of the girls look aweful young (although they don't have nudity they are just dancing around)
-Bonus sites are equally crappy or streaming only
-Trial give you access to practically nothing, parts of 4 scenes that aren't downloadable
-Expensive
-Crazy false advertising, I saw very few of the girls shown on the home page in the site
-What I consider unethical site behavior, see me comment
-No pictures except screen caps of videos, although it would appear from the front page that there are many pictures
-Video quality is mediocre to poor (1500 kbps typical) |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought this site sounded sort of interesting, however it proved to be pretty crappy and very misleading both in price and content. I strongly discourage anyone from joining this site. I tried to come up with some other pros, but I must admit I couldn't really think of any.
Very sketchy site, I recommend you look elsewhere. |
|
02-25-10 04:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Reality Kings
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Some attractive ladies
-Original content
-Excellent download speeds
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Good price through TBP
-Decent navigation, scene scores, search (although can be glitchy), model index, user comments
-Large network
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent photo quality
-Several updates a week, 10-12 on average it seems |
| Cons: |
-Odd biller
-Download limit, enforced regularly for me although others have reported otherwise (10 Gb)
-Video quality is okay on mid-sized videos, didn't download any HD videos due to limit
-No sizes given on videos
-Many of the sites are dead or infrequently updated
-Content can get repetitive
-A subjective opinion, but girls are too "porn" for me, lots of tats, large breasts
-Seem obsessed with ass, I like an ass and all, but move on after a while
-Camerawork is mediocre to downright annoying
-Male talent can get grating
-Lack of variety, even though it is a network serving several niches, all of the content has the same feel
-Too many ads, all over the damn place |
| Bottom Line: |
This site used to be one of my favorites years ago, and everytime I join I am less and less impressed with it. I read my review from before and am surprised I scored it so high, perhaps I was just in a good mood. Regardless, I don't think I will be giving them another chance.
The site does some stuff well, navigation is pretty good, download speeds were excellent (I maxed my connection at 1.4 MB/s). Their is some good material, and I enjoy the concept of some sites.
I am just unsure as to why some of these sites even exist - if it has less than 10 updates and hasn't had a new one in years can't you just merge the content somewhere? It just seems like an advertising gimmick.
There is still some good material, particularly the older stuff. But, it seems as though they have become far to focussed on the glam porn star look, even in their euro sites (Mike's Apartment and Sex Parties). For a supposed "reality/amateur" site, it just doesn't seem to fit anymore. For those that are fans of the typical late 90's-style porn star, this site might still be for you, but it is no longer for me. I grant you that this opinion is subjective, but they have definitely moved away from what I liked about the site. Also, it seems as though they get more and more focussed on asses over time. I like to see the entire woman, not 2 minutes of ass shots.
On top of these somewhat subjective complaints, they have a relatively firm limit of 10GB now, although I never came within 500 MB of that limit I was cut off frequently. I don't really consider myself a heavy downloader by any means, I tend to go through the screencaps to see if it is a scene I actually want. If you are going to impose a download limit, you should take note of your file sizes, and let users know - a 10GB limit with files in excess of 1GB is just irritating.
Overall, I think this site still has some decent older material, maybe worth joining once to get it. If you are into their older material, and unless you are totally obsessed with ass (not necessarily anal sex, just ass) I don't think you will be pleased with the direction of the site and I would recommend looking elsewhere, there are plenty of decent networks out there, although you may have to pay more. |
|
01-02-12 11:19pm
Replies (1)
|
|
