Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : dracken (0)

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428) Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 Cock Competition (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - interesting/original concept. A competition where girls spin a wheel to see what they will do with OG who owns a huge (plastic) penis and can cum gallons. - fun atmosphere. In all the videos the girls joke around, the male character is funny and makes weird faces. Overall the videos here are pleasant to watch because of the feel good vibe they have. - hot girls. Most of the models are young, big breasted, cute and willing to joke around as they try to deep-throat a huge fake cock - around 59 scenes that can be downloaded in high resolution either as wmv or mpg. DVD, ipod and other formats are present too but I never bothered since the HD download went with about 1-2 mb when downloading a single video. - each scene has a photo set of about 450-500 photos that can be downloaded as a zip. - camera angles tend to be a bit too close for my taste but are overall well done. The technical aspects of the videos being good. - the content is all exclusive - you get access to a network Cons: - the concept of a huge fake cock and gallons of "semen" can get boring/ annoying/ why don't they find a guy with a real dick? (I looked at it as girls doing stuff with a huge dildo and it worked much better) - could never get the streaming player to work. It might be my stupidity but I could watch videos on any other site adult or not, except the Porn Pros network. Good thing they don't have any download restrictions. - ads on the pages. There is a big banner for some live chat site at the top. It flashes and cannot be disabled. There is also a banner at the bottom but that never bothered me as it's not flashing five little "live" buttons - website can be slow at times. Maybe it's the flashing adds, but sometimes the page loads ridiculously slow, especially when you're already downloading a video. Bottom Line: It all depends on how you feel about the concept. Can you get over (or turned on by) the huge cock and ridiculous cum-shot at the end? I for one found it funny and entertaining. Seeing a girl try to do anal with the monster thing or seeing Shawna Lee thank her fans while covered in fake man-goo was hot and amusing at the same time. Others may find it awkward and annoying (the site does have a bit of a jock doing cheerleaders attitude around it). It really depends on your tastes. But be warned the giant cock theme repeats itself in the network several times (freak of cocks and cum shot surprise for example) as does the whole jock / high five, dude feeling. Also it depends on whether you like streaming or downloading videos. While there are multiple options of streaming they never worked for me, so either some technical know how might be needed or just settling for downloading stuff. (as I'm typing this I'm downloading 3 videos from them and the downloaded is going steady with 3.29 mb) Finally, remember that the cost of membership gives you access to another 20-ish sites many of them focused on teens, cum-shots and deep-throat so if you like that kind of porn this could be a good place to find it. 08-05-09  09:27am Replies (2) Review 102 Ass Teen Mouth (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 08-14-09  06:03am  (Update History) Reason: Expanded on previous review. Pros: - All the teen core club sites have good quality videos of hot teenagers doing hardcore, ATM is no exception. 54 sets of both video (Wmv at 640 x 480) and anywhere from 200 to 500 photos per session at either 853px × 1280px or 1280px × 853px. Sadly no zip files for the photos, but, on the good side, they are not screen caps... - Simple browsing. There are 27 pages and each page has two girls on it. It's a nice format and the site design works but it's maybe too simple at times a good search function would have helped a lot. - As the whole Teen Core Club network this site has some of the hottest European teens out there, and they all do hardcore scenes (deep throat and anal are a must for each model on this site). - The newer videos with girls make-up running as they gag are incredibly hot. - Camerawork and lighting are good, the videos look great and the photos are of a superior quality. Overall much better than other teen sites I've seen. Cons: - In my experience this was one of the worst sites from the Teen Core Club network when it came to loading times and downloading videos. This site over a period of 2 months+ failed to load at least 5-7 times. Even when I wanted to access it today in order to write this review it failed to load. Not to mention that navigating it while downloading three or four videos is impossible. More servers please! - The content is a bit lacking with only 50-ish scenes may of the girls available here also doing hardcore on other sites of the network. Some of the older videos are disappointing, looking exactly like the videos on Try Teens or Girls Got Cream. - The lack of a better (or any) search feature is a big problem of the Teen Core Club network and I won't re-hash all the issues it causes. Also the fact that all videos are downloaded with the same name can cause some confusion and unwanted over-writing of files. Bottom Line: Overall the site is nice and it was pleasant to see some of my favorite teens from this network really get into hardcore gagging and anal sex. Most of the older videos can be a bit repetitive as the content is not as extreme as advertised, but the more recent videos are really hot. I don't know who decided to put eye-liner on the girls before they choke on some dude's penis but it was a stroke of genius, making the scenes look great and very hot. However the same problems as the other network sites plague ATM as well. Lack of model search or a top rated search or any bio for the models as well as sometimes slow download and navigation speeds. If you read anyone of my Teen Core Club reviews you probably heard the whole litany of "They have great models why don't they do more to showcase them." Well, ATM is no exception and just a bit more work from the webmasters would go a long way into making this a better website. As it stands now, ATM has some good content and many hot girls. It's worth it as part of a network and even more so if you like hardcore teens that look extremely hot while doing crazy stuff. But on it's own, well it still has some growing to do before it can stand on it's own. 08-02-09  05:09am Replies (1) Review 103 Anal Acrobats (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -hardcore action -hot/cute actresses or at least interesting outfits -mostly lesbian action with golf balls, dildos and some other weird objects (I like lesbians so this is a plus for me) -relatively easy navigation -access to whole network -nice streaming options Cons: -the scenes and girls get a bit repetitive. you know that a golf ball is going to go into her ass -the gape can get a bit too intense, to the point where I felt sorry for a girl or two -the download speed is very, very slow -the network offers also similar looking girls/scenes so the bonus sites are kinda disappointing (or a bonus if you just wanted hardcore anal action) Bottom Line: Overall if you like anal action this is a good place to see some exclusive content. Many cute girls (including two dressed like rabbits, hopping around before they fuck and one dressed like a bee) but a somewhat boring theme after you've seen inside the colon of 5-10 girls. 08-01-09  03:31pm Replies (0) Review 104 Babes Network.com (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - The main site you get with this subscription is Babes.com, but they offer network access to Elegant Anal, Stepmom Lessons, Black is Better and Office Obsession. Babes.com has around 977 scenes with updates every 2 days, but the network updates even more often. - Scenes are pretty varied with a lot of different locations, premises and types of action. To give you an idea they have around 224 Lesbian movies, around 100 threesome scenes, 181 Outdoor scenes, about a dozen massage scenes and 149 work fantasy scenes which include all kinds of jobs. - Some great models and while the focus is clearly on white young models shot in glamour scenes there is some variety. For context 640 scenes have a Caucasian model. - Most scenes are around 30-40 minutes and there's a decent amount of variation in set up: some scenes have no dialog, some scenes have voice over to set things up, some have the actors talking and setting up the scene, it's a nice mix overall Cons: - As I mentioned in my Elegant Anal review this whole network has an ad problem, tons of ads pretty much everywhere you look. They are pushing content from other sites, they have channels which seem to be attempts to re-sell other networks. The regular membership only includes streaming and a big banner that ask you to unlock downloads. It's a pain overall and it feels like navigation is more cumbersome than it should be (the menu for example has 3 navigation buttons but 4 buttons that lead to some kind of promotion or upsell). - No easy way to filter all models from just one site. The tag system is alright, but could also be improved. Like let's say I want to see all interracial scenes on babes.com, but not those on Black is Better (which will obviously all be interracial) but the tag for black models doesn't show up when filtering by site, only when searching the entire network. Not a deal breaker but some odd quirks. Bottom Line: I don't usually join networks that are focused around boy-girl or lesbian content, so it will be a bit hard for me to compare this to sites like Vixen or X-Art, but I'm fairly certain babes.com is going for the same glamorous look so I'll give it my best. Also for full disclosure I had a streaming only subscription so I’m not sure how fast downloads are. Let's start with the positive: All videos I watched here were very well shot, good light, good editing with a nice mix of closeups and wide shots. They have some loosely themed series like "The Sessions" which is supposed to be a therapist interviewing a male or female model they end up having sex with, or "Bad Girl Justice" which is a series of about 5 videos themed around school girls having sex with a teacher and taking revenge on him for cheating. These mini series (some of them only 2 or 3 videos) give the site a chance to vary up the plots, the clothing and the location of the sex. Aside from this they also have some scenes focused on oiling up the female model, kind of similar to Fucked Hard 18 and scenes that are very reminiscent of Vixen with a voice over from the female model. More recently they added a few scenes that I believe are meant to look like they are shot at night in a dance club maybe a bit similar to stuff you'd see on Blacked Raw. Overall this variety makes the network pretty interesting as you're not always sure what you'll get when you open a scene. There is also some pretty good variety in the outfits the models are wearing and where the sex takes place. Finally, they have some great models, both European and American. Several scenes from Elena Koshka a great scene with both Elsa Jean, Piper Perri, scenes with Gina Gerson and Luna Rival and so on. For the most part pretty well known models that can put on an interesting scene. Unfortunately, the negatives drag things down: Payment is really not clear. They say unlimited access, but that means no downloads unless you pay an extra monthly fee. There are ads everywhere and it constantly feels like they are trying to upsell you. Navigation is good, but for a large network I would expect some better tagging and more filtering options. It’s also incredibly frustrating that you can’t tell what videos you’ll get from the pre-purchase preview pages. They have plenty of interesting content, I don’t get why they make it hard to preview. Overall, the technical and sales aspect kind of lower the score here. I happened to join the Team Skeet network at around the same time I joined this site and I find myself going to their site a lot more than I’m going to babes.com although the action here is probably more interesting. I just don’t want to bother with all the ads and rather poor filtering options. That said, if some of the models I mentioned above sound interesting and you want more variety than what Vixen offers this might be a good network to join. 12-18-18  03:56pm Replies (1) Review 105 Elegant Anal (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 95 videos with regular updates two or three times a month. - Streaming in multiple formats, always very fast for me, even when not on the best internet. - Well filmed scenes with a good mix of wide shots and closeup's on the girl's faces (especially when they first move into anal sex or if they really get into it) - Good light and a nice mix of positions, action and location. Some scenes only have anal sex, some decently long shots of pussy eating and rimming, some scenes are filmed on the floor, some have couches or beds... you get the idea it's a pretty varied mix. - Modern web page design, you can filter scenes by quite a few categories, the videos thumbnails auto play a preview when you hover over them, responsive mobile design. Everything you'd want in a modern site. The only big downside is that the model page is decent but shows models on the whole network, you can't see all the models that are on just on Elegant Anal - Good looking models. - Great photos. Cons: - Most of the models are pretty well known European actresses (Linda Sweet, Gina Gerson, Ivana Sugar) Not necessarily a con, but they have a certain look. - While there is a nice variety in the video premise and location I believe all scenes are boy-girl. Don't expect gang bangs or threesomes, I didn't even see any toys being used. - Some scenes are pretty short. The average is around 30-35 minutes, but for example the scene with Foxy Di and Martina Gold are each 19 minutes and there's a handful of other scenes that are around 25 minutes. No bonus behind the scenes footage or interviews or anything like that either. - Quite a lot of ads, the first page when you log in is an ad you have to close, there are pretty big animated banners at the bottom of each page. Since I only had a streaming subscription I periodically would get a banner asking me to unlock downloads. Bottom Line: Let me start off by saying that I got access to this site through a streaming only subscription to babes.com, so I'm not sure how the download options work. It seems like it would be fine as they advertise unlimited downloads, but I can't comment on that. Speaking of streaming, if you're not sure and want to check the site out that's a pretty good option since it gives you access to pretty much everything with the only downside being a pretty big banner that pops up every time I logged in reminding me I should upgrade to download. That said, the content here is pretty good. The models are really gorgeous and the filming style works pretty well overall. There are a lot of tracking shots, soft light and a nice balance of closeups and wide shots. I am also really impressed with the variation in locations, I don't believe any of the scenes are filmed in the same room. If you ever wanted to see anal sex scenes in a restaurant, barbershop, sauna or in a pool this site has you covered. As far as action there's a decent amount of positions (partially due to the locations), every scene has at least several minutes of anal in a few positions and most also have some oral and vaginal sex. Unfortunately not a lot of ATM (26 scenes are tagged as such) and if they use toys it's very brief (3 scenes are tagged as using toys). There are also a decent amount of scenes that end with an anal creampie or the male model cumming on the girl's ass, which is a nice change compared to the standard facial. Unfortunately it's a bit hard to find these scenes since the tags are not always that accurate. Another downside for me was that the set up is quickly brushed aside. Most scenes jump to the sex within 2 minutes, and the girls are completely naked within at most 4 minutes, which feels like a wasted opportunity. There are a lot of cute outfits that could be kept on or more slowly stripped off to add to the whole glamour side of the site, especially since a lot of the videos are only 30 minutes. There is one particular scene with Linda Sweet where she is dressed as a business woman/ FBI agent and she slowly undresses while getting seduced by a con-man, keeping her stocking and garter belt on, it was a very well done scene that used the setup well. I wish there were more scenes in that style, it would have made the site stand out more when compared to Tushy, Hardx, Holed or 21naturals. At the end of the day, that's probably the biggest downside, while well done there isn't anything that really stands out here. You can get more scenes at any of the sites I mentioned above, the models are pretty well known so you can see them do anal in other places and while there are some good scenes here I don't know if I can recommend it unless you're a big fan of anal glam porn and have seen the stuff other sites have. 12-05-18  07:33pm Replies (0) Review 106 My Very First Time (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A bit over 70 videos with updates coming in about once per month. (About 30 first anal scenes which are really great) - Good looking models and a lot of them are new to the porn scene - All scenes have photos in zipped archives and downloads are pretty easy and when they work pretty fast (see cons). - Navigation is alright, could be better but it works and you can use their search bar to look for certain types of scenes (lesbian, anal etc.) - The scenes are well shot and focus on the female model, you really get a good feel for their personality. Cons: - Just like Holed (and I assume the other sites in their network) videos & pic folders names are all generic names, which makes saving videos or photos a bit of a pain. - A lot more ads than I'd like and it feels like they are pushing the network membership pretty heavily (also be careful, because you can easily get subscribed to another site, there is no 2nd confirmation screen) - Unlike Holed, sometimes this site timed out and broke my downloads or didn't load all scenes properly. Not sure what the difference was. - Updates are a bit slow. Bottom Line: The thing that really sold me on this site was the way they shoot their videos. They have an initial interview which feels pretty natural and covers a lot of stuff other sites ask as well (age, how many scenes the girl shot, what got them into porn etc.) but they also keep asking the models how they feel during the scene. It doesn't really interrupt the action, but it's very hot when periodically they stop so the girl can talk about how they prepared for anal but they still can't take the male model's entire length (CeCe Capella’s First Anal) It makes scenes feel like BTS videos, but with a lot more action. The girls for the most part feel natural, giggle and seem to get into it, it gives the shots a unique feel. All of that said, the low frequency of updates, the small navigation issues the whole network shares and the number of ads make me hesitant to recommend this site for everyone. I really like it, but I'm a fan of BTS videos and I got the site on sale for 17 bucks, which is really worth it. I'd recommend it if the models look really good to you and the idea of behind the scenes talking during a video sounds interesting. 11-10-18  06:47pm Replies (0) Review 107 Rookie Babe (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Roughly 100 models, 225 photo scenes and 100 videos. - Most of the images are at 8000x1200, but a handful are as high as 2048x3072 and some go higher (maybe 25 go as high as 5120x). - Most girls have a video interview, but it's usually only 5 minutes or less with some pretty standard questions that get repeated for each girl (where do you like to shop, what couldn't you live without etc), some girls also have a bonus video where they talk about themselves, put some make-up on or get dressed. There are one or two solo masturbation scenes, but they are less than 5 minutes as well and not terribly exciting. - Good light and good framing for the photos. Some great shots of good looking models. - You also get a written interview with the girl with some playboy like questions (describe your personality, what do you love about your body, etc) - Decent navigation, easy to download content, good model pages. Overall very decent webdesign, functional and pleasant to use. Cons: - Very basic site, the photos are the highlight of the site and with only around 40 images in each scene not much is going on here, think Playboy level of softcore. The girls get undressed and pose around a bit, but no close-ups and just one outfit per shoot. - Videos are here only as a way to help you get to know the girl, but with some very basic questions and only 4 minutes of footage per clip it's hard to get excited about the movies available here. - While some of the more recent updates are in 5120 resolution some are as low as 1200, when the biggest selling point of the site is the high resolution of the images this is not good. All updates should be high resolution. - Videos are in pretty bad resolutions 640x400 and not really well lit. - When trying to stream a video I sometimes got an error that the video wasn't found..not sure why. It was rather infrequent, but still Bottom Line: I joined the site because several of the girls looked incredibly hot and I expected something similar to the cyber playboy club or met art. I didn't go into the site expecting hardcore action or even seeing the girls masturbate, but even so I ended up being disappointed by the content here. A lot of the scenes have around 30 images and they are all shot in the same location and same outfit. Several of the galleries are just the girl standing in front of a white wall or a brick wall or on a couch in front of a white wall. In fact I noticed that they don't even like to move the girls around too much. If a scene is shot in a hotel on a bed, don't expect the girl to also maybe pose in a chair or standing up next to the bed, they will have her maybe stand on the bed, but that's it. I understand that you would need to set the lights again and move equipment around, but when your entire site is dedicated to images you have to offer a bit more. I also mentioned the outfits, the vast majority of girls are dressed in jeans and t-shirts or very plain skirts. There are maybe one or two scenes where the girl is wearing a corset or stockings and high heels. But for the most part there is nothing here that I couldn't see walking down the street. Now don't get me wrong I don't mind that the girls bring their own clothes to these shoots, but the reason I would pay for a site that has only softcore images and under 100 images per set would be because I get to see the girls in different outfits, in different poses and under different angles, in glamor shots as well as outdoor shots, here the diversity is minimal. The content just doesn't feel worth it. I could go to Met-art or X-art and get the same gorgeous looking models in a lot better looking images. (mind you not technically speaking, the photos here are great, well lit and professionally taken, but most of the time the photographer could have chosen better ways to present the girls.) The other attractive aspect of the site for me was the idea that you could get to know the girls, get to know their unique personality, at least that's what the FAQ of the site promised. I guess the videos are meant to help here, but the low resolution, short length makes it hard to enjoy the limited clips available. The interviews are very brief and don't really help. Compared to Littlemutt for example, you don't get any feel for the models here. The one area the site shines in is the diversity of the models, they have some gorgeous looking black and asian models. This is one area that I really enjoyed and is lacking from many other photo sites. In the end the site has some great models but just doesn't use them as well as they could. If we had more outfits, more locations, more video interviews and daily updates in high definition this would be a great site. As it stands now I would recommend Met-art, X-art even Nubiles over this site. P.S. It only gets a 70 because the site design is very well done and the models themselves are incredible looking. 05-28-12  04:39pm Replies (0) Review 108 Webcam Hackers (0) 70.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems). - The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show) - As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo. - They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network. - Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot. - Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.) Cons: - Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong) - Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place). - The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear. - Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed. Bottom Line: Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird) Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old. Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos. So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles? Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money. Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great. More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.) P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites. 10-29-11  04:13pm Replies (1) Review 109 Teenrotica (0) 70.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Around 240 individual models with several scenes, coming in at around 1200 photo scenes and around 280 videos (some very cute lesbian action but mostly solo videos) - Most models are incredible and as far as I cna tell they are not the same few girls that show up on every site. - A lot of corsets, stockings and high heels. I don't think I've seen such variations in outfits on many sites. Very nice and classy. - Most scenes have around 150-200 images and you get to see the girl strip from cute dress or skirt or what not as well as play with a dildo or touch herself. -Decent navigation (has some errors, but nothing huge) you can search by type of content, bra size, hair color or model name. Although I don't think all scenes are labeled correctly. - They have some pee scenes and a few anal scenes, a bunch of lesbian scenes and 4 vaginal fisting scenes (including a girl with 3 dildos in her vagina.) oh and around 10 blow job scenes... not too spectacular but I guess it's okay. Cons: - I don't think the site is still updating. I've been here for a month and I don't believe they got anything new. (some ) - Some links don't work and my download speed varied greatly, sometimes timing out. Might be just me, but a FYI. - Videos are about 9 minutes or so and are almost all under 100 mb... I thing this is a dead giveaway as to the quality of the scenes in terms of resolution. Don't bother is what I'm saying. - The action in the videos is also sub par so in case you missed my last point, the videos here are an after-thought and you shouldn't expect anything else. - The photo scenes get a bit repetitive since all the girls seem to use rather similar toys (having a sybian or a massage wand or a selection of larger dildos would have been nice) but overall the cuteness of the girls saves the site (as long as all you want are solo photo-sets) Bottom Line: I joined the site with the mindset that I was joining a photo gallery, despite their claim on the free tour to have a "large HD video pool" don't expect that. They have a lot of models and a lot of photos, as well as some BONUS videos. (I don't know what else to call all the videos where the girl has 9 minutes to get naked and fuck herself with a dildo...) Now that we cleared that up, let's take a look at the actual images. For the most part I was content with the galleries I downloaded from here. The chief reason for that is that they have an incredible amount of very cute models. Most of the girls are European but you don't get the same Eastern European vibe many sites seem to have nowadays. They have girls from Portugal, France, Finland, UK, anywhere in Europe, you name it and they probably have it (even one girl from Mongolia). They of course also have a lot of US models and you can easily navigate the girls by age, haircolor, country or horoscope (I guess most models here are Aquarius...not sure how it helps but there you go, now you know). Sadly, they do the old porn trick of claiming every one is 18 or at most 20. The oldest girl on the site is supposedly 23 and there is only one.... of course when you look through the girls they mostly look 25-ish, but whatever. Anyhow, for the most part the girls look young-ish, have some make-up but not incredibly ridiculous amounts of it (for the most part, as one or two of the "18 year olds" on here needed a lot of foundation and pig-tails to pass as under 30) What matters more though is that the girls personality seems to shine through their sets. I suspect that they had the girls bring their own wardrobes from home, because I felt a strong consistency. One model is all innocent and dressed in white, while another is playful and has rainbow colored socks or what not. Overall, I'd say they did a great job with giving most of the photo scenes personality (intentionally or not) That being said, they do have some very weak photos where it feels like they tried to pad the gallery with shots that are almost the same (girl moves her hips a bit or something like that) More focus on the dildo and masturbation would have been nice. In several sets the dildo action is maybe 15 photos out of 150... Not good enough. Navigation, while okay also had some issues. They have a big add for MC-Nudes.com that never goes away. At the bottom of the member's page they have a link to a free preview and a few other Join now promotional stuff. Small stuff, but it shows that someone doesn't care enough. Furthermore, the specials on the site are nothing but a few more similar galleries. It's really a joke. The vote for a model feature they seem to be very proud off doesn't really seem to do anything and I found it a useless gimmick to make users feel like they are involved. Oh and the biggest negative point is that they don't seem to be updating anymore, so yeah... that's pretty huge. All things considered this is not a bad site, or better said this looks like it was a good site back in 2008. Nowadays it feels outdated and lacking. I'd say you can get much better content at Nubiles, X-art, probably Met-art or Karup-s PC. If you really like some of the models in the preview page ( and there are a lot of cute ones) consider joining once to get what you want and then more on to better sites. They get a 90 for the quality of models and a 50 for everything else so I guess around 70 is the correct score. 10-15-11  12:35pm Replies (0) Review 110 First Anal Date (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 38 videos and around 34 image sets (updates seem to happen more frequently recently.The last few updates are as follows: 15 Oct 2011, 7 oct, 15 sept, 9 sept, 07 aug and april before that ) - Around 25 minutes for each video WMV available as 1920x1080 and around 480x270 - Images are available as zipped archives and look good (anywhere from 50 to 200 per scene) - On average very good looking models and we get oral, vaginal sex and anal in a few different positions (almost all scenes have doggy and reverse cow) The finish is mostly on the girls back although we have a few facials and anal creampies. - Navigation works pretty well and if you hover the mouse over the preview scenes you get to see a few images from the scene (It makes getting an idea of the video you're about to see much easier) - You get access to (I believe all) Pink Visual streaming sites as well as I shoot my girl, they caught on camera and a few more and if you stay with the site longer they give you more sites. Cons: - All the models have different names from other sites making it hard to tell what model you're looking at (I believe they have a few new girls here, but I can't be 100% sure) The lack of a models index makes this even harder. I'd like too see more focus on the models, but maybe that's just me - The scenes tend to have very poor lighting and some of the older ones look closer to amateur porn than something professional. - More search options will become necessary as the site grows. - Pretty huge ads for other sites - A lot of the action is pretty generic Russian porn. There are a few scenes that look really good with the actors getting really into it, but a lot of the girls look bored/ mentally checked out. - All videos save as fulllength-high.wmv, which seems to be a plague of Russian sites. Makes organizing your downloads harder. - I hate that the PinkVisual sites don't allow downloads (I know they are just offering those sites as a bonus, but I love complaining about them :) Bottom Line: I joined this site because I am a "completist" and wanted all scenes with Aspen (who is named Olga or something like that on this site). However, I was surprised at the quality of some scenes here as well as the nice bonuses they offer. The videos, especially the large option look great(honestly don't even bother with the low resolution stuff since the poor light and the 420x resolution will make for a horribly looking movie). They have a lot of good looking models and while the action is not the most diverse, there are a few really good moments here. Some highlights of the models they have are Aspen, Agnessa and Henessy as well as a bunch of other girls I didn't recognize (Vanessa and Lucie are were very adorable). The scenes range a lot in quality with some girls who look like they are drunk or half asleep to some girls that push themselves into the guys cock. I remember one particular scene where the girl is eager to get him in her anus and grabs a bottle of lube herself. It was incredibly hot seeing her lube the dude and force him into her ass. What is also pretty darn cool is that they have a bunch of videos where the girl seems really hesitant to go for the anal sex. For a site that calls itself FIRSTanal date that makes a lot of sense and a level of "realism" that ads a lot to the feel of the site. (Sadly for the most part the girls don't even seem to notice a difference between vaginal and anal sex) Overall, I'd say they come pretty close in type of content to sites like Teenmegavideos or maybe Firstanalquest (Firstanalquest has a lot more stockings and cute outfits, something this site avoids entirely). The big difference, of course, is that firstanaldate only has around 40 scenes so far. Just comparing the number of videos you'd get those other two sites are better deals or even better go to 21sextury or Teencoreclub and get a hell of a lot more content with better light and more variation in outfits/ action. Now don't get me wrong if the site continues to grow at the pace they showed for the past few weeks this will become a hell of a deal. (And if you're like me and need all videos of a certain model this is is also a great deal :) What is nice though is that the site seems to know that it's not offering enough content so they give out a ton of nice bonuses. The Pink Visual network is pretty great (except for their streaming only policy) and if you hang around for 100 days or so you get around 20 bonus sites (of course a bunch are old and don't update anymore but Bang my teen ass, Nasty angels,18 pussy club, I shoot my girl are all nice sites with similar content. Sadly young libertines and casual teen sex don't seem to be available as part of this "stick around get bonus sites" deal) Considering the bonuses offered, the limitations of almost all Russian porn sites (why the hell does everyone have to re-name models? ) and the bonuses this site offers the whole package is not bad, not great, but not as bad as many other sites out there. I still stand by my opinion that 21 sextury or Teencoreclub are miles ahead of this place, but if you're bored with those more mainstream places and love anal scenes this place is not bad. Bottom-line: average, worth checking out if you're a huge fan and looking for new sites to join. 10-15-11  10:31am Replies (3) Review 111 Stocking Stars (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px) - A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise) - The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time) - Some hot models that really seem into it - Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar. - Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs) Cons: - The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then) - The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option) - More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos)) - The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.) - Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie. - Some sets are mislabeled Bottom Line: This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name) Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so. To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like). The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings. Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music. Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties. Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites. Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey). Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion) That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network. 09-18-11  12:42pm Replies (0) Review 112 Make Teen Gape (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Some very hot girls (Aspen, Logan, Libit) doing hardcore action, with somewhat more focus to anal sex, but each girl does oral and either a facial or an anal creampie (For some of the girls they actually do both which is kinda nice). - 26 scenes (and no more updates by the look of it) - Good lighting, make-up, overall they strike a good balance between the young aspect of the site and the sex (It's not Lollita, but it's not generic porn dvd #3 either). - Hardcore action similar to the rest of the network, a lot of focus on the girl's face, some nice close-ups, pretty decent action overall. Nothing but praise for these hot girls who choose to get their but abused pretty roughly Cons: -The site is not the best in the network by far. It doesn't even have the best models from the other sites (Some girls are nice but not when compared to the number of hotties on Assteenmouth or Girlsgotcream for example...) -Limited amount of scenes and no future planned updates -Some girls seem to not be able to take the anal action and halfway through the video they switch to vaginal sex. Which is perfectly fine if your site wasn't called Maketeengape and you weren't focused on anal sex. -Some scenes look and feel like they were meant for other sites in the network, but for some reason ended up here (see the comment above with the girls switching to vaginal sex halfway through) -Don't be mislead by the title, this site is nothing like gapeland or norestfortheass. No anal DP or huge toys here, in fact most of the gape is quite reasonable -Technical issues with the site make this whole network not worth it (see my review of the teencoreclub network. Bottom Line: I hate to beat a dead horse but the whole Teencoreclub network has serious technical issues. You can read more about it on the Teencoreclub network page. Speaking of which that is what you want to join. The membership to this site alone is not worth it. Trust me, get the more expensive teencoreclub membership and download the content from all their sites since it's all pretty similar. Now don't get this the wrong way, the fact that most sites in the network have similar content is not bad, it simply means that you don't want just this site. You want it all. It also means that whoever runs the company is kinda sneaky and decided to create a new site instead of updating some older ones (looks much nicer to say you have 47+ websites...although you don't no matter how you slice it. You only get around 20 sites with only 4-5 of them updating constantly (Assteenmouth, Doubleteamedteen and Hardcore youth, maybe try teen too)) Is it false advertising? hell yeah, is the site crappy and hard to use? (no zipped images, only one option for downloading videos, no easy search feature etc.) hell yeah But is it worth it? I say yes, some other people might say no. The big question is what do you want from your porn. I prefer girls to look natural (little make-up) I don't care a lot about striping videos and can live without the interview before the scene. I want anal and deepthroat action, but don't want to see too much abuse or ridiculous gape. For me the network was worth it. However if you care more about how you navigate a site or streaming or very responsive customer support, then you should consider another teen network (xcoreclub, teenmagavideos, 21sextury firstanalquest, etc.) PS. Before I forget, I love the photos they take (cute girls smiling, more stripping, more close-ups etc.) But for some reason they have around 20-30 images of the same scene, just slightly changed. I actually went in and deleted every 3 and 5 image and made for a much better slideshow for myself, but still it feels like they are just dumping everything they shoot without caring about the end user. I guess that is their general motto: we have incredibly hot girls so suck it up and deal with our shitty service. 08-27-11  06:18pm Replies (1) Review 113 Deep In Cream (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 98 videos and 44 photo sets (the videos are available as WMV and the more recent ones are also available as MPEG, most videos are available as 720x480, although the MPEG is a little smaller) each video has screencaps which are rather fuzzy and not worth it IMO - Those 44 photo sets are separate photos available at 1600x1200 in zip files. They are very good clarity and you get about 100 or so per set. - About 30 anal scenes, 3 ass to mouth, 7 DP... and I can tell because of the nice filter system which allows you to see each scene by category. Also each video tells you what model is in it and you can find her anywhere on the network or on DVD's (which you need to buy) - Pretty energetic action and the creampies don't look fake. You don't get any story or interview just a chick who gets fucked, but it's pretty satisfying. - A few cute girls and the network is a great bonus, I could find several cute girls on other sites. - Steaming, download, canceling membership, Cons: - Like I said most scenes can be a bit too standard, most girls look like average porn stars and in my opinion the best content is in other places on the network. - The site loads another page in the background when you log in. It's just a porn review page, but it was a bit annoying. No trojans or viruses yet. - Some videos didn't stream for me, but not sure if that was my issue or the site. Bottom Line: Overall the site is decent, however I don't know if it's the best cumshot or creampie site out there or even close, in fact most of the scenes are kinda average, the girls look okay, but they could have better make-up or more interesting clothes or something...I just felt like other parts of the network were more interesting. After about 5 minutes of looking at girls on this site I found myself navigating away to first sex video or the hardcore site. That being said if you like hardcore and cumshots you should probably check out this network, they have a surprising amount of anal and deep throat and most of their girls look very amateur, although there are a few professional beauties like Kara Mynor or Haley Paige. Oh, before I leave two minor issues with the site are that after you have 3 videos downloading it slows down to a crawl and each video saves under the same name so you have to go back and re-name stuff. On the other hand the streaming works flawlessly. Also the tour page is pretty reflective of what the network has to offer. A solid set of sites, with decent navigation, clear update schedule and solid tech side, although the content itself could be a bit better. 10-19-10  07:02pm Replies (1) Review 114 Nasty Little Facials (0) 70.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Some pretty cute amateur-ish models (Delilia Darling is a darling :) and about 80 or so videos, a lot of the models appearing in the rest of the network too. - Not as hardcore as the facial abuse or anal recruit videos, and therefore more enjoyable in my opinion. - I had very good customer support experience and the owner of the site really seemed like a decent guy who was willing to offer me money back when I had a problem with the login and what not. - Pretty decent download options up to 1280x720, but the older scenes are kinda fuzzy and not very enjoyable - Each video has a zipped photoset and download speeds were decent (as far as I remember, it's been a while and now I'm just looking through the galleries saved on my PC) - Streaming worked well, even in large resolutions. - You get network access, but many of the other sites are focused on much more hardcore stuff. Cons: - Remember how I said some models were pretty cute, some are not at all, or you hear them talking and it makes you cringe. I heard a lot of stoned/ stupid girls doing porn, but some of the chicks on here are very "interesting." Guess they get points for weird originality (they are the only network I know with a deaf girl) - Older content was disappointing. - Not enough updates, I think they are really focusing on the facial abuse site and neglecting some of the other ones. Bottom Line: To be perfectly honest I am not crazy about facials and although I downloaded some stuff from this network I only recently stumbled upon it in a dark corner of my hard-disk. The thing is almost all scenes are not just deep throat, but involve some sex, even anal sometimes. There are threesomes, there are POV scenes and even some "reality" set-ups. Which kinda makes you wonder if it's all exclusive stuff. The newer videos definitely, but the older the scene the more uncertain I am. Anyhow, the site feels a lot like a more mild version of Facial abuse and I think the owners realized that whoever is interested in the energetic hardcore of FA won't care very much about Nasty little facials. As a result Facial abuse received several site re-designs, has more frequent updates and is clearly the main site for the network. In other words, if you don't care for facial abuse or some other site in the network, this is pretty much a waste. That said, you can still get some nice pretty hardcore scenes here and there are a few models that I haven't seen before. The site itself was pretty decent and had a search, a model page, zipped images, you know all the nice stuff you want your porn site to have. Now, if you're really into deep throat I'd recommend the Teen core network, which has the young throats site, also there are is whole facial fest from the bang bus network, which can satisfy any nasty cum shot desire. But if you're tried of the same old stuff and want some serious hardcore stuff, check out Facial Abuse and consider this site a bonus. What's nice about this whole network is that you can tour almost all their models and get an idea of what they each do. Hope this helps and remember if you don't like rough sex this is not the network for you, but if you enjoyed Max hardcore, back in the day then this is probably the place where you want to be. 08-23-10  08:13pm Replies (0) Review 115 Teen Slam (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -39 scenes in rather poor quality 452x300 . Most of which don't have full download options (available only as clips) On a few of the more recent videos WMV and MPG are offered. I'd have preferred MP4 but that's just me... - each scene has a few screen caps at around 480px × 640px. No zipped archive and not really worth saving IMO. The images are blurry and don't even come close to the quality available in many other places. Teen Dreams comes to mind as a good place for teen hardcore photos. - a lot of new faces (I didn't really recognize any of the models and I browse most of the young adult networks) and mostly relatively cute girls. Some act more shy than others and some are cutter than others, with a lot of girls I didn't care for (but that's subjective). All and all a decent mix. - some of the more recent videos have trailers. - access to the whole meat members network which has around 54 sites and hundreds of scenes. The site is very well integrated in the network. Cons: - last video is from 06.2009 but before that the last video is from 2007. A huge gap....also I am not sure if further updates will be available - no way to search only inside the site. Say if you want to see anal within the Teen Slam site. - no model pages - streaming claims it requires windows media player 11 I had it installed and firefox still wouldn't stream. Didn't have this problem elsewhere. - download speeds aren't the best I've ever seen. It capped at around 50-70kb. Bottom Line: All and all this site has/had potential. There are some really cute girls in here, although they can be a bit hard to find among the less good looking ones, a better preview system would have worked wonders. Most previews are just a shot of the girl with a penis in her mouth, the penis obscuring half the image due to the angle. Anyhow, the main problem is not bad previews but the fact that this site was probably abandoned in late 2007, for a while updates were regular (back in 2007), then they stop. Only to have that last video from 2009...does this mean that the updates will start back up? maybe, maybe not. By 2007 standards the site is good, but compared to other networks, it lacks. When places like Facial Abuse offer HD videos and this place has mostly scenes cut up in clips of 1 minute each there isn't really any fair compassion. When sites offer high def photos and Teen Slam tries to compete by offering screen caps...nope, won't do. Bottom line. A lot of potential, a decent amount of cute teens doing hardcore, not enough dedication by the webmaster. The site is mediocre and if there is something else in the Meat Members network that you like consider this site as well, but Teen Slam is not a deal maker or breaker. (Gave it 70 because I really liked one or two of their models, but if it weren't for that, this site is not worth it.) However this site will also get you access to the whole Meat Members network which boasts 57 Sites 29123 scenes, 8000 Bonus DVD's and 374864 Photos! Now keep in mind that the bonus DVD's are only for streaming and that some of the scenes are actually low quality stuff that you will probably not be interested in. However, this is not a bad deal, especially if you're into rough sex with a lot of anal. The whole network seems to slowly move in that direction. 10-30-09  03:11pm Replies (0) Review 116 Dream Kelly (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - About 190 videos available as WMV (320x 240) or quicktime. A lot of the more recent scenes also available in HD (1200x 720).Very fast download speeds. - Around 270 photo galleries with more or less 400 images each (1024px × 682px). No zipped files though. - Good looking model, with a wonderful smile. She also has a bunch of different hairstyles and dresses up a lot. However, her back kinda put me off (her spine is very pronounced and looks kinda reptile like in some videos... only a few though) - A decent variation of dildo, vibrator, strip and some photoshoot videos. But no sex scenes and no anal that I could find. - Access to a whole network of 7 other solo girls and around 50 other websites. - Really good HD in the more recent videos. The content is very good in terms of quality. Cons: - Although the site is a solo model type it doesn't really connect the girl to the audience. No forums or chats, no special request videos section or web-chats. It's good content but why not go the extra step and make it an interactive experience? - It's only one model who doesn't have sex or do anal. How often can you see the same girl play with herself? On the positive side the network access compensates more than enough, offering access to many sites. - Lack of a search function is bothersome at times. A category search (strip, play with self, roleplay, etc. ) would have helped. - An update schedule would have also been nice. - Many of the videos are cut after 12 minutes in several parts. This can get frustrating as you have to download 3 videos for one scene. - Interviews with the girl would have made the site much better, helped us connect to her. Bottom Line: Overall the site is nice for a solo girl site. There is a lot of content and the model looks beautiful, especially with pony tails. My main problem was that the site doesn't try to establish a connection between the users and the model. Solo sites work well when the girl responds to users, does videos that they ask her to do, chats with them and so on. Even something as simple as adding a brief interview at the beginning of each video would help. Having her say a few silly things about her week would make people feel closer and enjoy the site more, IMO. Also in many of the videos the soundtrack covers her noises or she doesn't make any...this results in a somewhat awkward video. More natural sounds, maybe let her play with herself until she cums and record that...I think it would make for a much better site. Finally, I feel like the girl used to look a lot better in the older videos, which is a shame since the HD is so crisp and nice, but this could be just me so no points off for that. What I am taking points off are the lack of a search function, no photo zipped archives, no easy to access update schedule...small things that gather up to make for a slightly less than satisfying experience. What brings the grade back up is that cute smile Kelly has in some videos, the slight awkwardness when she fingers herself and those huge, gorgeous eyes. A great model and a site that could be improved. 09-18-09  05:14pm Replies (1) Review 117 Melissa Midwest (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - around 204 videos of Melissa moing increasingly more hardcore stuff 840x480 in WMV. They also stream pretty well, but are a tad bit on the short side at around 5-7 minutes. The older videos usually have multiple parts which makes them longer but also a pain to download. - around 400 photo galleries with pictures around 790x 400 I think... No zipped files though. - Access to three other websites Sweetadri (a friend of hers she stars with in a few scenes) Foxyjacky and melissawebcamvideos. - Melissa is very hot and in many scenes she looks like she is having a lot of fun. She also does a lot of dressing up (halloween, bride's costume, etc.) and most of her sex scenes are with her dressed... - The site also has some small fun interactive games and a forum (couldn't access it) They say Melissa sometimes posts in the forum but as the site is pretty much dead I doubt that... - It's very hot to see Melissa progress, her hair and body changing and her going from softcore to hard... Cons: - No updates. They promise new content but I think Melissa is done with porn at least for now. - Browsing could be improved a lot simply by grouping the small video together or offering zipped photo archives. - The site is really focused on the contact between members and Melissa and now that she is gone the site is just an archive of the good days. - Couldn't access some parts of the site (games and forum) It simply wouldn't accept my password. Customer support never answered me. - There are at least two videos that are from a TV interview and a court case? That is not porn and should not be on a porn site...maybe in the bonus section. Bottom Line: Watching the videos on this site in chronological order is one of the hottest porn-related experiences I've ever had. Seeing this girl evolve over time, seeing her enjoying porn more and more and seeing her eventually doing hardcore is very, very arousing. It's a rare situation where after seeing a few videos of one model you end up feeling connected to her, but this site manages it. I even read all her bio and chuckled at her pre-porn career photos, heck I feel closer to her than I did to some of my ex-girlfriends (which is not proof of how poor my relations are, but of how good the videos on here are, IMO). So yeah, basically this site rocked my socks off. However the fact that her webcasts don't really happen anymore and there are no updates, no information about where she is now..it kinda made me sad...I wanted more. Which is the only complaint I really have with this site. More videos, more download options, more Melissa. Her first BJ video, her first sex video...they are so hot but so short why only give us a few minutes? I understand they are but why not put them together and offer it as a large file? Not even the DVD's and magazines the website promotes are current... At least the bonus websites offer some high quality videos of her (actual camera instead of the webcamera...) So overall, this is an awesome site that manages to do exactly what a solo model site should. Make you connect with the model and have a very arousing experience without being boring...however, it stopped updating so rating it above 80 is really out of the question. I truly recommend joining it and taking down all videos (orbit downloader might help grab all links on a page) and the check back in a year or so to see if Melissa is back or not. However, the chances of her being back are slim. On the other hand if you're not a big fan of her you can see a few fee galleries around the internet and call it a day. ( Be aware though that none of her older stuff is easily available elsewhere) Hope this helps and Melissa if you're out there...please come back :) 09-13-09  02:05am Replies (1) Review 118 Becky's Dungeon (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 54 photo galleries with anywhere from 150 to 400 photos each. No zipped archives and the photo quality was very different ranging from 525px × 700px to 825px × 1100px. - around 228 WMV (320x240) videos and about 12 MPEG videos. No streaming, just downloads. However the download speed is quite good. A minor inconvenience is that a lot of the larger scenes are split into two or three parts. Also some of the videos are not exclusive but rather taken from slave-videos.com - around 64 cellphone videos. My phone doesn't support this mode so I couldn't say how good it is, but any 3g phone should work - Scenes usually have a dominatrix and a submissive girl who is tied up and tortured in quite a lot of ingenious ways from needles through breasts to pumps, clamps and all sorts of twisting devices. A lot of focus on the breasts, some scenes don't even showing the girl's vagina. This doesn't mean that clamps on vagina's or penetrations are not present in some scenes, just not so often. Cons: - A huge disproportion in the attractiveness and type of models used. From MILF's to Chubby and to Teens this site has almost every kind of model. And they don't have any way of sorting through them. - In my opinion to much focus on the breasts. There are scenes where the girl still has pants on when they are done. - Some scenes were a bit too graphic for me, the breasts turning purple or bloody from all the smacking and wax pouring and what not. But I guess that is a good thing if you're really into extreme breast mishandling. - Poor quality on most videos. 320 is not really that good, also most scenes only run a few minutes. - The photo galleries are ordered per model so in one photo gallery you may see the same model in 3 different outfits or stages of bondage. I wish they had made separate galleries for each one of those sets. - Sometimes the quality of the lighting is questionable, making it hard to see what is going on. The small video resolution is also part of it. Bottom Line: A good site for bondage, especially if you like breasts. Access to streaming videos from ABEE.net (I hope that's how it's spelled...a big network full of bondage videos) is a great bonus, and the exclusive content can satisfy anyone with a passion for abused women. For me it didn't really work because it didn't have enough penetration or focus on the models (they have a brief description about the model and the shoot, but I usually like to see more, get familiar with a model before I see her abused...) Also I felt some stuff was way too graphic... Unfortunately it seems that the newer updates are from slave-videos so they are not exclusive anymore. Also the 3-4 minute video clips don't really satisfy as they could if it was all a bigger video. Overall, the site does some good things (exclusive content, some cute models, some very hardcore breast brutality) but does a bunch of other things wrong (lack of navigation features, not that much content, content isn't that qualitative, wide differences in how cute the models are/how big the photos are.) I'd recommend it for anyone who really enjoys breasts with clamps on them or anyone curious to see girls covered in hot wax, but if purple breasts are not your thing, this site is really not for you. If you also don't care for streaming definitely look elsewhere. 09-02-09  02:50pm Replies (0) Review 119 HD Porn Pass (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge amount of content. Around 2056 image sets with around 200-300 photos each at around 1066px × 1600px or 680px × 1024px also around 1800 videos available as Wmv or quicktime at 380x210 or 1280x720 (which makes the video look awesome. Crystal Clear). The content is spread over 21 sites such as (anal hell, teens kissing and India uncovered) - Bonus access to a bunch of other websites of solo girls as well as 7 or 8 hardcore sites including her first anal, which I visited more often then the main content.... - The streaming works fine and was surprisingly fast. - A lot of hot models and good scenes, but don't expect any amateurs. Most of the actors are big names like Hilary Scott or James Dean. - Quite a lot of hot scenes and some anal and squirting is in there too. Sadly you have to dig to find it as there is no easy content-related navigation. Cons: - Navigation is a bit slow. With four videos downloading I had trouble loading the preview photos. Also as soon as you select a video it starts streaming instead of allowing you to select what you want to happen. Just a bit frustrating, nothing too major. - Many videos are cut into two or three parts and you can't access all of them at the same time (they are each considered their own separate video instead of being part of a bigger one) This is probably a way for them to produce more content out of nothing, so those 1800 videos cut that in half... - Download speeds were very slow for me (under 100kb most of the time) - Many scenes weren't that hot. There is a small back story and then sex, but somehow it just felt average. Maybe I'm getting too old and jaded but I just felt like there was something lacking. This is very subjective though so I won't take any points off. Just be warned that scenes can look a bit too generic on some network sites. Bottom Line: Overall this site was a pleasant surprise. The bonus content was very nice (saved everything I could from Her First Anal) and the amount of content was nice too. The photos looked great (I'm not big into images but even I downloaded a few sets) Also the India Uncovered site was nice. If you like ethnic women this site might be a true gold mine. As for the HD quality...well I'm torn, on one had the videos looked great but I wish there was an option in between 380x210 or 1280x720. Also some more diverse content would have been nice most scenes being too generic for my taste. The back story was boring (a gamer boyfriend get's seduced...wow...how hot; some guy get's a girl a rose and bones her...wow..how original) Again this is very subjective though so maybe others will enjoy the scenes more... The navigation could have been better and overall the download options weren't satisfying (no zips for photo sets and poor quality for quicktime movies). So my conclusion? This is a good network with at least two, three interesting sites. The videos download fast despite slow speeds(because they are so small (50 mb each or 200 mb for the high quality stuff) There are some cute girls and some nice scenes but you have to look a bit too hard for them. In the end the best description is that this network "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend." 08-29-09  05:03pm Replies (0) Review 120 Sweet Members (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A lot of content. The membership offers you access to 25 websites (sweet auditions, bukkakepiss, french fisting, max hardcore, angel videos etc. Most of the sites are hardcore and most of the content is of pretty hot girls) Each website has around 10-20 models minimum each one with anywhere from 1 to 5 videos and just as many photo shoots. Add some bonus galleries (both video and photos) and dvd content and you have quite a decent network. -A lot of cute models/hot scenes and a lot of hardcore scenes (the camera man/interview person was a woman which made the whole scenes somehow much more hot...in fact the interviews I saw on this site are some of the best I have ever experienced...but then again I love interviews.) - Videos come in various resolutions and types (wmv, quicktime, mpg) and some download very fast. However, the quality of many videos is sub-par. I guess that makes them smaller and easier to download but still.... - Streaming worked very well for me. Cons: - The biggest problem I had with this network was it's inconsistency. Some sites had poor quality videos (Athens Angels come to mind, with fuzzy videos at poor quality) While others have up to 640x480. The models are also rather random, there are some chubby girls and some mature women but you have to manually look for them; most of the models are teens or teen-looking. Finally some sites had easy navigation while others made you dig for the content. - Speaking of navigation it could also be improved. It was a bit buggy at times with pages loading the same models twice, and some sites not letting me use the open in new tab option which made my navigation very hard... - Finally, the download speed for me was very bad and many of the videos crashed before they were done. However since my connection is very poor right now so I am not going to take points away for it. Just be warned that a spotty connection can result in every video reaching 0 bytes after it's about 25% done. Bottom Line: The network has a lot of issues. Most videos are available only in pieces. The fact that there is no real way to search for chubby or mature models (or any kind of models in fact) in the whole network also makes the navigation unpleasant. Sure we have a search model by name but unless you know the girl's stage name this is not really useful. The previews for videos are very poor quality (they reminded me of 70's porn shots). There is no zipped archive for photos and so on...You get the idea, the network could be better. I personally also had issues downloading videos but I blame that on my poor internet connection. However, on the plus side I had never seen so many pee, anal and group sex scenes of hot women and teenagers. The female cameraman was also a nice change, but there are also videos of sex without any back story if you prefer that. Overall a nice variety of hardcore porn (including a bunch of Max Hardcore videos which are pretty good if you like female abuse and ridiculous anal) All and all the network has good content, which can be very interesting if you are into water sports, anal, or bukakke (however it's spelled) but the navigation and user features could be improved. Worth checking out and if you like the Max Hardcore style of videos or the Pierre Woodman. For me it worked for others the issues might be too much to deal with. 08-29-09  03:24pm Replies (0) Review 121 Gag N Gape (0) 70.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: -young girls doing hardcore -no download limits -straight to action Cons: -some videos are poor quality -navigation can be a bit annoying -the girls often look like they're not into it at all. I actually had to stop one video because I felt sorry for the girl involved. -no English, no story, just action (this can be good or bad) -girls look much better in the preview than in the actual videos (all sites do this more or less but this whole network is a bit decieving) Bottom Line: If you like teens doing hardcore get the Teenmega world pass which includes this site, but be warned that it might be a bit to "real" for your tastes. At times I left the sites wondering why the heck are these girls in porn if they look like they hate it. 08-01-09  09:54am Replies (0) Review 122 CFNM Teens (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Team Skeet network so you get a lot of similar content across the entire network. Several of the models you see here are also available on Exxxtra Small or one of their other sites. - Some really attractive young adult models (Elsa Jean, Alexa Nova, Joseline Kelly). The entire network has some great models so no big surprise here. - All the pros of the Team Skeet network: fast download speeds, archived photos, well shot action, frequent updates (to the network, not this site) and so on. The website is clearly run by a a professional company and they have pretty much all the bells and whistles you'd expect. Cons: - Sadly no more updates since 2016. This is a dead niche site. - The same downsides of the Team Skeet network. Lots of ads, some minor issues with navigation and their search system could be better. Bottom Line: This is going to be a short review since there isn't that much to say about the site, after all they only have 30 scenes. However while other sites in the Team Skeet network have a lot more content I really enjoyed almost every scene they have here and I'm secretly hoping that more attention might convince them to bring back this style of videos. Almost every scene is POV and some of the earlier ones only have blow jobs, no PIV sex. The action itself is good, but relatively average. The models are hot, but again there are other sites in the Team Skeet network that have the same models and a lot more content. What makes this site stand out is the nice variation in set up and the girl's outfits. Vera Drake is giving a massage in a very cute hippie romper she just slides to the side so she can ride the male model, Harley Jade looks great in a business outfit, there's some school girls outfits and stockings that get ripped. Unlike a lot of the sites focused on particular outfits there is a nice variation and they go out of their way to shoot scenes in different locations with outfits that for the most part look very normal. I wish they had kept this site around and explored even more types of clothing. I guess a lot of the content that could have gone here now ends up on Exxxtra small since that site has plenty of interesting outfits (or Innocent High if it's school girl themed), but it would have been really cool to have a Team Skeet clothed sex focused site. The score is necessarily low due to the small number of videos, but for me it was a really nice surprise in the network and I wanted to call it out as such. 01-06-19  06:36pm Replies (0) Review 123 Casting Couch Teens (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - They claim around 2000 scenes, I counted around 150 on this site and a few more bonus scenes, however you get access to an entire network so maybe if you add everything up you'd eventually get 2000 (a pretty nice network btw. with a lot of young adult action). - Scenes are available as clips or WMV at around 480x 360. Sadly no HD available as far as I can tell - Images are available at around 667px × 1,000 but no zipped archive as far as I could tell - Some seriously hot teens, some of them exclusive (of at least I haven't seen them around) and some pretty well known porn stars. The action is very hot, although we never get more than the standard boy girl scene (no anal, no deepthroat etc.) - Several of the girls are pretty good actors or really, really enjoy the sex. If you join check out Carmella Diamond getting her ass licked. I have not seen a girl moan that much in quite some time. - Okay download speeds, no issues with time-out or log outs. Okay webdesign Cons: - The entire network doesn't seem to update anymore. Which is really a shame. I think they occasionally throw a video up, but months go by without anything new. - The quality of the videos is poor. Fuzzy images, poor light in some scenes and while the images are better they can't really save the site from a technical aspect. - Web design is way too basic. No real search options, the descriptions of the scenes are very bare bones. The whole network here feels outdated and desperately in need of some love. Bottom Line: I am really saddened about this site. The models they have are great, a lot of very, very cute girls (they even have the Cherish & Cali twins doing an appearance). They have a nice mix of better known models as well as some girls I never heard of. What is even better is that all the girls involved look very realistic. I couldn't tell if the orgasms were faked and quite often you actually believe that these are naive teens surprised that this is a porn audition. Great job, I wish that all porn sites had models this dedicated. Even better each scene is long, at around 30 minutes. They start off with an interview that turns sexual pretty quick. In a way it reminded me of the Back room casting couch site or Exploited college girls, but the models here know what they are getting into and play along very nicely. Instead of awkward giggles and shyness you get some gorgeous looking girls playing coy and it actually works. However, that is pretty much where the good things stop and the negative aspects come in. The content is great, but the quality is horrible. VLC player crashed twice when I tried playing these clips. I get strange green screens and fuzzy images. The resolution is bad and the light in some scenes is terrible. You have a great looking girl give head to a dude and look in the camera just as the whole screen becomes a mess of pixels. Streaming requires extra plug-ins, no zipped archives for images and what they call the photo gallery is screencaps from the movie. You want the digital stills for the actual photos, which half the time are overexposed anyway. To make things even worse the updates are slow to come, maybe one every few months or so. I think since the last time I joined (2009 I believe) they added about 5 or 6 scenes, all in the same bad quality. Now, on the positive side you get access to a few other great sites like teeny bopper club and big cock teen addiction, both of which also have awesome content, (with the same technical limitations sadly) Bottom-line: If you like teen content I'd join this site once just to get all the awesome content, and never come back. They wasted some great models on shitty web design and poor video quality. P.S. The 69 is only because I absolutely love the models here and the way they act. Otherwise this would be a 50 11-07-11  07:18pm Replies (4) Review 124 American Bukkake (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A lot of scenes (way over 200), starting all the way back in 2004 and up to January 2011. - Videos (640x320, 340x240 for the older stuff, which unfortunately means most of the content here) and images (720x480) although no zipped archives here. - A lot of pretty good looking models and a ton of guys who cum on them. We're talking about dozens of dudes in most scenes. Basically, I don't think I've seen any other site which shows this much cum on a girl (excluding fake semen). The Gokkun scenes, where the girl actually swallows a lot of the semen are even more intense. - A lot of behind the scenes videos were you get to see the girls get ready, some candid interviews and a few mistakes. - Access to the entire network which includes a lot more oral fixated videos. - If you have not gotten any of these videos before, and like bukkake and oral sex this network is a decent value - relatively easy navigation, didn't have any issues with log-in or downloading or streaming stuff Cons: - This site doesn't seem to be still updating (although others in the network do update) - Too much of the site's content is focused on behind the scenes videos. I love those scenes, but with a lot of the videos at around 340 resolution and the more recent ones almost entirely BTS, it feels like we're missing out (In fact I believe they have some behind the scenes for videos we don't even see on the site.) - The site needs a serious face-lift. The navigation right now works, but it's lacking. No search functions, no easy way to sort through the different types of scenes. No model pages. Compared to many other sites this feel like it's missing some basic features. - More download options and more/ higher resolutions would be great. - Overall content can get a bit repetitive. Bottom Line: I joined this network because I had never seen any of the videos from JM Productions before and as far as I can tell none of those scenes are available anywhere else on the internet in one place. Not even Videobox has all the DVDs from the American Bukakke or Gag factor series. So basically if you enjoy seeing good looking girls getting covered in cum you can't miss these videos and VOD would be way more expensive than a months membership on this site. On the other hand the sites in the network feel a bit like they are the bare minimum necessary to get 30 bucks out of you. The design is very basic and a lot of the older stuff they offer is in poor, poor resolution (for this site which hasn't been updating recently that means a lot of the content is not very qualitative). The other reviews here already pointed out that many scenes that are on DVDs are not available on the site, there is no HD and there is way more Behind the scenes stuff than necessary (Gagfactor has a much better mix of BTS and actual content.) To this list of complaints I'd like to add that for a bukakke site there isn't that much actual bukakke here. Several of the videos are actually lesbian bukakke or reverse bukakke, both of which are squirting in my book and don't belong on a site that writes half it's title in a semen-like font. Also while I understand that this site is strictly focused on bukkake, I wish they had more fore-play. Not necessarily sex, (although a few of the scenes where they have a good old gang bang before the cum are nice) but more stripping, more of the girl getting naked. Right now most of the scenes feel like they start in the middle with the girl already masturbating and go on from there. Another annoyance was the lack of a better preview page. Right now once inside the members area you get on huge list with the female models name, the date the scene was updated, a small thumbnail that is often not very descriptive and the length of the clip. It's not enough to really sell the scene. I'd love a models page or a category search so I can find all the lesbian bukkake scenes quickly. Now that I got the negative points out of the way I'd like to focus a bit on the scenes, which for the most part are great. They have a few with actual sex (if you join check out Chastity Lynn's anal bukakke, it's great) and a lot of scenes with many, many men cumming on one girl that usually plays with herself a bit before the actual cum-fest. If you enjoy facials, ruined make-up, a lot of cum and some swallowing you really can't miss these videos. All the models seem to have a good time and they joke around a bit a the end of the video. We also get a bunch of more or less interesting twists (birthday cake with cum on it? bukakke in a gym? Martini glass or dog bowl filled with cum? They have it) There are also a bunch of different outfits, corsets and even some light BDSM. Another highlight are the Behind the scenes which for the most part are petty good (I preferred the ones on GagFactor). If you enjoy seeing girls get ready for the scenes, joke around with the camera guy, change from regular street clothes to sexy outfits then this site will be a nice surprise. I personally really enjoyed a few scenes where you get to see the girl without make-up, acting very casually, but you have to be interested in BTS to really see a great value here. So overall, this site doesn't rank as high as Gag Factor (see my review for that site as well before joining the network) but still offers some nice scenes for anyone who loves cum-shots. The lack of recent updates, low resolution and the niche appeal hurt the score and while there is a lot of fun in the scenes here I don't think they have as much personality as other sites in the network. Basically I'm recommending this to fans, for anyone else check out the other sites in the network or consider another place to get your facial videos :) 10-02-11  07:32pm Replies (5) Review 125 Sasha Rose (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - 26 scenes with Russian model Sasha Rose doing all the basic and not so basic stuff (solo masturbation scenes, fisting, regular hardcore sex as well as anal and double anal penetration, lesbian action as well as lesbian fisting) - Videos are all good quality with multiple size options and formats to chose from HD- 1920x1080 SD- 640x480 and WMV or MP4. - Images are available as zipped and are decent quality at around 1200x800. There are around 170 images per set and overall they look decent/ aren't just thumbnails. - The site had great download speeds, no log-out periods, no issues navigating and overall it probably has the nicest interface of the whole network. - The Bonus feature is a joke, but you do get access to several network sites that still update pretty often. - There is a members forum where you can report issues and in theory could communicate with Sasha. (t would be awesome if it worked) Cons: - The last update on the site was 10.10.2010 and I don't think we'll see much stuff here in the near future. - The forum, while a potentially nice bonus is devoid of life and Sahsa only posted on it 6 times total. - The whole strength of a solo site is the girl offering new and unique content. While the scenes here are exclusive they are not incredibly unique (except for one or two). A membership with many other networks will get you similar stuff from Sasha. Some of the outfits here are nice (a hot pair of heels here and a nice corset there) but simply not enough different content to warrant joining this particular site. - The network sites are nice but several of them are old and don't update anymore (Dildo sex machine last updated in 2009, Brutal anal sex doesn't have dates but is old. Extream Kream updated this year but irregularly, anal dildo lesbians last updated in 2008) - They have adds in the member's area Bottom Line: I love Sasha Rose. I loved her since I first found her sets on Teencorenetwork. She does anal, fisting and even double anal and makes it look effortless and fun. She has a great body and gorgeous lips, overall she is one of my favorites so joining a site dedicated to her sounded like a great idea. While I usually don't care very much for sites dedicated to just one particular porn star I've had some good experiences in the past. Membership to a solo site usually means some live chats, maybe a forum or journal of sorts and even if the model herself is not posting someone pretending to be her does, which is the most you can ask for really :). I remember solo sites where the girl would upload random photos of herself every day, answer questions regularly and auction off bits of her clothing or just give it away, you could make special requests for a certain type of outfit or scene and she would deliver. I even remember one site where the community convinced the girl to finally try anal. Overall what I'm saying is that if you're not going to promise hundreds of different hot girls but just one you have to make sure that one girl caters to her fans. This site at a first look appears to do just that. Sure, most of the videos are pretty average sex scenes, but you also get some unique and exotic content: a milk enema video, a peeing scene that is very tastefully done. We get some interesting outfits (black leather jacket and white stockings anyone?) In the beginning Sasha was posting in the forums and they were taking requests for what the next scene was going to be. Everything seemed to be going great. Then it all stopped. No updates, no one answers the forums anymore, it's like a ghost town in there. The first thing in the member's area is a banner proclaiming they will update weekly. There are dozens of users asking when those updates are supposed to happen and dead silence since 2010. It's like a slap in the face. The site looks great, it navigates very easily and has a ton of nice features (each scene is dated, rating buttons for each scene, easy to preview the action and even easier to download stuff) Sasha looks awesome and she does very hardcore stuff, but nonetheless the webmasters dropped the ball in the worst way possible. It almost feels like Sahsa decided to leave the network and they had a huge fight or something. Now don't get me wrong the content that is here is not bad, in fact it looks great, but except for a few videos, you can get the same type of scenes on a dozen other sites that will also have a lot more scenes. I would have loved to see some backstage stuff, some interviews (I know she doesn't speak English, but subtitles or a translator) something to make more of a connection with Sasha. They only have the same type of porn I can get at 21sextury and teencoreclub and on top of it all they aren't even updating anymore. The network itself is not bad, they have a few sites that are still updating regularly and a bunch that have older videos/ clips. But I wouldn't join just for Sasha's site. If some of their lesbian/ dildo content on the other sites looks incredible and you're already in the network Sasha is a nice bonus, but otherwise it's simply not worth it. Check out brutal dildos, huge strap-on lesbians, moms teaching teens or brutal fisting before deciding on this network (those are all sites that still update regularly and have significant amount of content). Those sites bundled into the package also drive the score up from a 60 for this site to a 69 overall package value. 09-24-11  12:21pm Replies (1) Shown : 101-125 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.36 seconds.