Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : dracken (0)

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428) Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 76-100 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 Brand New Faces (0) 80.0 Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review. Pros: -many amateurs (around 120 videos I believe) -exclusive content(as far as I can tell) -hot interviews and sex scenes (look for the two cousins who show up together and then have sex on two different days) -good streaming player(very fast and nice) -pretty good previews Cons: -a bit hard to navigate/download stuff -many Latino women and not that many teens -some videos are disappointing compared to the previews/what is promised -not able to download videos Bottom Line: Overall the site is a very nice amateur site, with funny girls that seem genuine as opposed to all the fake boobed girls out there. Most of them are also beautiful and ready to get dirty. The user-options leave one unsatisfied, however. Anyhow it's a site worth checking if you like interviews and sex scenes. 08-01-09  03:56pm Replies (0) Review 77 First Anal Quest (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 08-03-09  02:58pm  (Update History) Reason: I keep confusing young teen, for barely legal, sorry about that. It will not repeat. As I will not post any more links Pros: - as far as teen anal sex this is one of the best out there - many of the shots are hot and the girls look awesome - decent quantity and quality - regular updates with previews of the upcoming update - the bonus section has many full length dvd free for downloading - decent download speeds (around 200kb for four videos at a time) Cons: - a bit pricey for only one website (although the bonus dvd make up for the lack of exclusive material) - if you like story behind your porn, tough luck. All you will get here are sex scenes, not even an interview (most of the time) - some girls look better than others (actually some girls look like they had a lot of anal before) - the male models could be better looking and more into it - the navigation can be a bit annoying until you get used to it, no way to search for model name - all scenes are in a different language (there isn't much dialogue but still a small subtitle could have added to the atmosphere) Bottom Line: If you like teen sex with a bit of pain in the girls faces, instead of the wide asshole type, this is the place for you. The quality of the videos varies a bit but overall this is a place with hot young girls and good scenes. The girls look innocent but ready to do whatever the guy asks them to do (in some other language than English be warned). It is still new and it will certainly improve in the future. Keep an eye out for it. 08-01-09  10:28am Replies (0) Review 78 Teen Mega World (0) 80.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Updated: 08-03-09  07:43am  (Update History) Reason: Added pors and cons and changed grade after visiting the site again Pros: -NOT a scam of any kind. The girls are all legal and the subscribing/unsubscribing part worked just fine -A lot of content spread over many different sites. I am not a member anymore but I remember around 1500+ video scenes from all the sites and just as many photosets. -young, cute looking girls doing hardcore -good download speeds and the material seemed exclusive -updates pretty regularly on the main sites (teensexmovs, teen sex mania gagn gape and the lesbian one) -decent price for the amount of content offered Cons: -just sex, no story, no interviews with the models. Nothing but hardcore sex with girls that sometimes look confused. for some it is their first time on camera and some emotions are natural but some (not very many) girls looked completely out of it. -rather hard to navigate (have to enter each site manually, hard to search for a certain model) -some videos in my experience had bad quality as in bad angles or poor lighting. Mostly the older ones. Bottom Line: It's a good deal if you like hardcore teens. Most of the girls are awesome (you can judge how hot they are from the preview area), but the camera work is lacking quite often, also one of their male models is so ugly I could not watch the videos where he appears (but this is very subjective) Overall I'd recommend it as I found at least ten girls that in my opinion are incredible. I just wish they had some info, maybe an interview in order to get to know them better. 08-01-09  10:13am Replies (6) Review 79 Teach My Ass (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 08-14-09  04:56am  (Update History) Reason: Added info and expanded bottom line opinion. Pros: - Approximately 74, good quality (640 x 480) Wmv videos with no download limit or any kind of protection. - Just as many photo sessions with anywhere from 150 for older sets to 400-500 for more recent ones. Each image is in either 853px × 1280px or 1280px × 853px. Sadly no zips for these files makes downloading harder. - Access to 15 other teen hardcore sites if you get the teen core club deal. - The premise of the site is that a specialist will help a young girl loose her anal virginity for 100$. To play in with that there is a short interview and then the specialist takes a pretty wide range of dildos and other anal toys to the girl's ass. He then fucks her and cums on her face or more rarely inside her doing a cream-pie. - Most girls are very cute (the site's biggest bonus are the models) and it's surprising to see what they are willing to let someone do to their ass. - Many close-ups and all videos are POV (which can be bad at times as some scenes get static, but it works) Cons: - Often when downloading a large list of videos the site logged me out, thus confusing my download manager (caption word log-in makes it impossible for download managers to get in). Also each video saves under the same name so I had to manually re-name them. - Somewhat annoying to navigate, no search function, no model sorting system. This is especially frustrating as some models from this site are on other sites from the network but there is no way to see where. It would be great to see all scenes done by one model. - Girls speak poor or no English, making interviews often boring to watch (the guy translates in Russian, then back in English...also his voice get's annoying). - Videos tend to get repetitive and not enough focus is put on the girls, with (IMO) too much close-up of genitals and interior of anus. In each scene there are about 10-15 minutes of the girl just sitting there with her ass in the air and the guy probing her. Hot I guess...but we loose all of her reactions... Bottom Line: I am a fan of anal movies involving teenagers and this is one of the best sites in this niche out there. The girls are hot and the extent of anal abuse they receive is pretty impressive (almost every other scene has the guy stick a flash light in there at some point...which can be a bit too graphic, but if you like that kind of stuff it's pretty hot). However, there are some things that disappointed me. The site's and the whole network's navigation is one of the biggest cons. I really wish there was a way to see all scenes from a model, regardless of which site she is on. I didn't realize one of my favorite Try Teens models was on here until today... Another big con is that the site focuses too little on their biggest asset, namely the gorgeous models. We loose their reactions when they are getting anally probed because all videos are in POV and they focus mostly on their bottoms. Sure it's great to see a close-up of her gaping hole, but why don't we also see her face, cringing or looking pleased or anything? Also many videos skip the getting undressed part, jumping from fully dressed to completely naked. A big part of the foreplay is lost right there. At least in the more recent videos some girls keep parts of their clothing on, making the scenes a lot sexier. Finally, the fact that each video has the same name when downloaded and that the older videos are only available as 7 or 8 parts...well, it all drags the site's score down. What keeps it up there are the very, very hot models. The girls look great and seeing them smile shyly as they get on that anal probing table... It's worth it. The porn on this site has some of the best looking teens around and the way they act makes most scenes incredibly hot (An uncertain glance into the camera, their cum covered smile at the end...it all makes the scenes feel real in a way not even amateur porn manages to do it). If the site owners would learn this and showcase their models even more, while also adding just a few more user options this would be one of the best networks around. Like this it's just a good site, worth checking out if you like teens and anal (and have the money for the pricey membership). 08-01-09  08:45am Replies (0) Review 80 New Sensations Network (0) 79.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Thousands of videos most of them in pretty high resolution (but of course older scenes are only around 640x360) Updates are also relatively frequent, but it might not be your specific niche (while I was a member they updated mostly incest themed scenes) - Photos are available in archived zip files but they are only screen caps and sometimes you get 30 images, sometimes there's 200 with several virtually identical shots. Overall I wouldn't join this network looking for quality images. - Some great scenes in a variety of niches. The Ella Nova and Samantha Rone double anal scenes are a must buy in my book, but they have some really well done parodies as well and the Anya Olsen Eliza Janes lesbian scene is incredible. Besides the awesome models all recent scenes I've checked out are very well shot with a lot of variation in angles and action. They also mostly use soft lighting that gives scenes a nice mood. - The network goes on pretty deep discount pretty often. Cons: - As other people pointed out the search function is not the best and finding the scenes you're interested in can be a bit of a pain. - Since they still seem to be focused on DVD's sometimes you get several updates in one niche one after another, then no similar content for a few weeks. Also for some DVD's you only have the option to download the whole movie instead of individual scenes (this is mostly an issue with their XXX parodies) - The type of content is a bit all over the place, they have some really intense double anal scenes for example, but also some more standard, almost romantic scenes. There are some DVD's that feature one actress in multiple BDSM scenes (The Submission Of Emma Marx) and other DVD's that are focused on the daddy niche. The variation is nice, but also makes it a bit hard to recommend the network to anyone who is interested in one particular sub genre. - I've had some issues with downloads timing out, nothing too bad but a bit frustrating. Bottom Line: New Sensations reminded me of Videobox or Bang, one of the networks that have a lot of DVD's from several directors. While I believe most, if not all of their content is shot for them exclusively it's clear they're ripped from DVD's so you get a wide ranges of themes, types of action and even quality. For example the ASS FULL OF DIESEL DVD is focused on close up anal action with very little set up, while the James Deen scenes are almost identical in style to the videos he puts up on his own site and Analized. The older Mike Adriano scenes feature his style of POV with lots of lube while some other scenes feel like they were shot for Teen Fidelity and so on. This makes it a great network to join if you're interested in a lot of different types of porn, but aren't looking for a specific niche. However, it can be a bit disappointing if you really like one particular theme and realize there's only one DVD's worth of content for it. Also since they're probably trying to appeal to as wide an audience as possible a lot of the scenes seem to follow the trends in porn with plenty of focus on step siblings and hotwifing. A few older scenes (I suspect right around when 50 Shades of Grey came out) are focused on BDSM or tied up models. Since there is so much content and it's all pretty varied it's hard to make any general statements. For the most part all content is really well shot, the models are good looking and the action is varied, but it does depend from DVD to DVD. Some videos focus more on the setup, while some jump right into the sex, some are more POV focused, while others have soft light and wide shots. I don't regret joining and I grabbed around 200 scenes that I'm very happy with, but I also don't know if I'll be joining again until they update a lot more content that I'm interested in. It certainly didn't feel like a site that I had to stay subscribed to for a long amount of time. The lack of photos and some navigation quirks also didn't help it's case, but on the other hand I think the scenes with Ella Nova are some of the best she's shot. If you've never joined the network before, like the models they have or really like porn parodies I'd say the score is easily 6 points higher, but for me personally it was a bit of an average network. 01-06-19  05:52pm Replies (1) Review 81 Innocent High (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Access to a large network with thousands of scenes and a lot of them are focused on young looking US based models (I think the only exception really is Lust HD which seems to be focused on European girls). If you like one site you'll probably like most of the ones offered here. -Innocent High itself has 458 movies and updates about once per month. Updates are available in several resolutions from 360p to 1080p (Although several older scenes only have 576p as the maximum). - Each scene has zipped photos and screen caps. Zipped archives are named after the model (thank God for no gallery(10).zip) - Like every site in the Team Skeet network, navigation is pretty straightforward, downloads work well and overall the technical quality is good. - Top notch models. Most of the girls are really good looking and act well. A lot of known names, but there's a handful of somewhat new faces. Luckily the tour page gives a good idea of the content you will get. Cons: - I wish there were less ads. There's a landing page when you first log in and several promotions that look quite a bit like regular scenes. Not a deal breaker as nothing auto plays or takes over the screen, but a bit annoying. - Scenes seem to be anywhere from 25 to around 45 minutes with more or less set up. It's a bit hard to know what exactly you'll get, one or two of the older scenes just have the girl masturbating while there's a voice over, some of the recent scenes have a 5 minute set up. It's a bit of a mixed bag and since they're working with a relative limited niche the plots are not as interesting as some other TeamSkeet sites. - A bit repetitive for example only 5 anal scenes, 5 threesome scenes, no lesbian scenes, almost all scenes end with a facial, the girls almost always wear the same school girl outfits (although they do have a handful of cheerleader outfits). - The tagging system for the network is a bit of a pain to use. Bottom Line: I commented on my Teens Love Anal review about the pros of the TeamSkeet network. They have good download speeds, a lot of scenes (going back to the early 2000's if I'm not mistaken), great models (mostly pretty well known actresses that you can see on other sites, but hey they are well known for a reason) and they have discounts and sales pretty often. The whole network has a focus on young adult performers and most of their sites focus on a niche within that. You can probably guess what Exxxtra Small or Teen Pies focuses on. Innocent High follows the same pretty obvious naming convention and focuses on school girls having sex, mostly with their older male teachers. Most scenes are around the 30 minute mark and are shot in rooms that look convincingly like a classroom. There's a lot of sex on chairs and desks, but occasionally you get a bed or a couch if the girl is supposedly skipping class. Almost all scenes are BG and while the action is pretty varied with a decent number of positions I do wish there was some more variation. For example there is just one female teacher as far as I can tell, no MMF, very few threesomes at all and while the other Team Skeet sites seem to have at least some ethnic diversity almost all girls here are Caucasian US models. Even the plots seem pretty formulaic. While Teens Love Anal seems to have all kinds of story reasons explaining why the girls have to have anal sex Innocent High is rather narrowly focused on a teacher catching the girls doing something they shouldn't and then either blackmailing them or the girls seducing the teacher to get out of being expelled. I can't complain too much since the network has other sites dedicated to specific niches, but I wish they had played around a bit more with the idea of schoolgirls exploring sex. Maybe a high school party that turns into an orgy or a teacher showing several girls how to use toys on each other. It’s really a shame since the outfits the girls wear are pretty cute most of the time and the models could pass for 18 year old's in high school, I just wish the site went the extra mile to have them in more unique situations that match their theme. Outside of this rather subjective complaint the site is pretty good. I did have some issues with the pages not loading properly and I really wish they had a better tag and naming system (a scene called Skip Class And Fuck My Ass has no anal sex for example) but overall the network is pretty good. The only reason I’m giving it a 79 is the amount of ads and the somewhat limited variety, if you don’t care about the schoolgirl niche this could easily be a higher score. 01-05-19  07:36pm Replies (0) Review 82 Nebraska Coeds (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - The site claims to have 1236 Movies and 283 models and as far as I can tell that's pretty accurate, you can go back all the way to videos from 2004 (and surprising enough, a lot, if not all of the older videos have remastered versions which are very good 1280x720 quality) - Regular updates (I'd say maybe every 3-5 days there's a new video going up) - Not all videos have photos, but those that do have a very useful zipped archive and even a larger resolution zipped archive. - Definitely amateur models, don't think I recognize any of them, but overall the selection is pretty good with a range of body types and looks. - The content is mostly girls masturbating, but there is a lot of variation in location, toys used and length of the scene. There are a lot of videos from festivals showing nude women dancing or wet t-shirt contests, decent amount of girl girl action (hard to navigate the categories, but maybe about 100 scenes), about 40 or so scenes of blowjobs. Cons: - The site looks dated, the search is not great and the categories are not always that descriptive or easy to navigate. - The model page is pretty bare bones, it's useful to see all scenes from one model in one place, but they often don't even have a photo of the model, just her name and how many scenes she is in. - Camera work is pretty bad at times with a lot of jerky movements and a lot of scenes have a very distinct "college" feel. There are several scenes of weed smoking, the camera man making bad jokes about the sex toys and several of the girls don't really seem that interested in the action. - Slow download speeds on the largest videos (as far as I can tell these are pretty much uncompressed high bit-rate videos that are not that different from the HD mp4's and the site does warn you it will be slow so there's that) Bottom Line: I'm a fan of amateur content and several, if not all of the models here are clearly not professional porn actresses. There is a very distinct "unscripted" vibe and from the way several scenes go together I get the sense that the site owner finds girls who are willing to film and they hang out for a day or so shooting a bunch of different videos. This site in particular has the solo or lesbian scenes while some of the more hardcore stuff goes to After Hours Exposed. Because of this the scenes on here end up really varied: there are some interviews with the girls, some shower scenes, some videos where the girls are already naked and it feels like they just finished another scene. It's a bit of a mixed bag that doesn't follow any strict steps, for better or worse. The same thing extends to the models and videos as well. As with any site that uses mostly amateur girls some are more comfortable and fun, while a few seem a bit stiff and awkward. Some scenes, especially when there's natural light in the room end up looking really good, while in some scenes the light and angles are not really that great. Overall a mixed bag, I'd say a mostly positive mixed bag, but don't go in expecting the standardized production quality of a large budget porn network. Something else that didn't really work for me, but I'm sure is a selling point of the site is the focus on a "party vibe". For example, there are a lot of photos and videos from festivals and "spring break". Some of the girls in these are really cute, but I didn't feel like it was really worth paying subscription to see a few seconds of some topless girls at a fest. Luckily, there are plenty of other videos with more explicit content so it's easy to ignore this content. All of that said, I got access through a membership at Backroom Casting Couch and as part of that network this is certainly a good deal. Between ExCoGi (Exploited College Girls), the Casting Couch HD content and this site I can't think of a better network for amateur models. It's not big budget porn so it doesn't have that level of polish and there are some rough edges, but there are certainly several really hot videos here and there is so much content it's easy to skip the stuff that doesn't work for you. P.S. for what it's worth I haven't had any of the issues with downloads or videos not playing that RagingBuddhist mentioned in his review, but your mileage may vary. 12-04-18  11:19am Replies (0) Review 83 Woodman Casting X (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Over 1600 casting scenes (interview with the girl and softcore stripping), 594 Hardcore scenes (about half are actual sex scenes and half are casting+sex) and 146 behind the scenes videos. - Around 636 casting photo sets (softcore stuff) and another 156 hardcore photo sets. Each set only has around 20 images or less, but they are available as zip archives and are pretty high quality at around 3000x4000 - Older content is lower quality and oftentimes just a few minutes long (for the casting and BTS, hardcore scenes are all around 25-30 min) However most sex scenes are available at 720x520 with most stuff from the last year or so as high as 1920x1080. - Various options for downloading a scene, and very fast servers. No more time-outs or random log-outs when I set up a long list of downloads (see my negative comment from last year) - A few improved ways of navigating the site (you can select to see only girls with sex and you can filter the girl's nationality) - Hot models! Cons: - While navigation improved in certain areas it could still use a better search function (right now the search bar is basically useless and there is no category search for anal, threesome etc) - While you can filter the girls by nationality a better filter would have been language of casting interview since many of the older ones are in French. - All the casting+hardcore scenes feature Pierre having sex with the girl while filmed by a static camera... a bit disappointing even compared to the two or three cameras used by Backroomcastingcouch or Exploited college girls. - Updates are a bit random. While we get daily updates they are mostly casting videos. I'd say some months we get two or three hardcore scenes, some months 6-7. A lot of the casting scenes feature very broken English and little nudity. - The site advertises heavily for Wakeupnfuck, Pierre's other site which cost another 40 bucks or so. - Some content is available on other sites Bottom Line: Pierre Woodman was probably the first guy to do casting videos with innocent looking girls he then convinced to do DPs and Anal. He worked for a ton of big name porn studios and has a huge library of casting videos and Behind the stage videos a lot of which are fascinating to watch. There is nothing quite like seeing a girl be shy when first interviewed, no make up, no fancy clothes, just a girl "next door" hesitant about the porn world. Except you also get to see her doing a crazy scene with three guys a few minutes later. The appeal of Woodman is this transformation from regular girls to pornstars and this site is great for that. You get to see over 1500 casting scenes and roughly a third of those girls go on and have hardcore sex on camera. For many of them you can even use the forum and ask Pierre about juicy stories or details (one hesitant girl didn't do porn shots but hung out with the crew and had sex with them in between shooting. Another girl had her very first sex with Pierre... the stories go on and on and while they may be a bit exaggerated they add a certain Risque flavor to the videos.) Once you consider that the girls are for the most part incredibly hot European models and almost all scenes on the site involve anal and/ or DP (even some rare double anal if you look around closely) the site is very interesting. Another bonus (I already mentioned a bit) is the forum interaction where Pierre answers questions and tells stories about the girls. It's frustrating to hear how many of the castings also have a hardcore scene, but Pierre can't release it because the girl didn't sign a proper contract :P Unfortunately there are some downsides too. First of all a lot of the older interviews are in French and even the more recent ones don't have very good English. I really wish they would use subtitles more often. The Forum also uses a lot of French and there are constant promises that we'll see an update with a particular girl that does a casting, but her Hardcore or BTS video never goes up. In fact since I last joined Pierre added only a handful of BTS videos, which is really a shame as many of them are very interesting. Speaking of updates a lot of new scenes are going to Wakeupnfuck which is a sister site focused on POV scenes where Pierre has sex with very hot models. However membership to Woodmancastingx won't even get you a discount on Wakeupnfuck. In fact the rather expensive membership here won't give you any kind of bonus features. (A while back I think there was talk of having live shows but after a few of those no more updates) The site navigation could also use some improvement. There is a section for updates where you can see the different types of videos and there is a section for girls where you can filter by nationality and girls who have sex, but there is no way to filter a specific category of sex and sometimes links are wrong or a girl is featured twice in the line-up. Basically the site needs a bit of re-design. I'd also like to note that a lot of the older content here is available through Pornstarnetwork and one nice feature on Pornstarnetwork is that they put the casting and the hardcore scene in one video so you can easily see the interview then skip a few minutes and see the girl having sex. The way the site is organized now that would be impractical, but I'd like some way to queue movies. Another frustrating aspect of the site is that whenever you click on a video the page loads and the scene starts playing immediately. This is a pain if you just want to download a bunch of videos and don't care about streaming, but I guess it might be a personal preference so I won't take too many points off. Previewing a scene could also be more user friendly... On one hand I'm glad to see more hardcore videos than before and some easier navigation options on the other hand the price of the site is still very high and the fact that Wakeupnfuck is not included in the price is a disappointment. The forum is full of promises that more hardcore or at least BTS will be released soon but in the meantime it feels a bit strange that after almost a year absence I discovered very little new here. Bottom Line: If you really love Pierre's stuff and want more of his stuff the site is for you if not Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls might be a better fit. As it stands right now, without better browsing tools, without some sort of discount or membership to Bonus sites this is a strong 79 very close to 80. 07-08-12  05:47pm Replies (6) Review 84 Beauty Angels (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 180 scenes and they update the site very heavily (I believe thy had an update per day for September so things are looking good) - A lot of cute models doing mostly hardcore action (including a lot of anal and some lesbian anal toy play) - Each set has video as well as images downloadable as zipped files. (Images are around 960px × 1,440px or 1,440px × 960px. Videos come in three categories high WMV files, Medium FLV and "portable" quality MP4) - The network, while not perfect allows for easy log-in in all the websites you are a member off so you can easily search for more scenes featuring a particular model. Or you can try to use the advance search function which (almost always) returns pretty accurate results - Each update has a nice tagging feature so you can quickly tell what the scene will contain, the model name age and date it was added onto the site. - The action in the videos is varied and pretty hot for the most part. Good camerawork and nice models Cons: - There are a lot of small issues with the site and the network in general, many of which I mentioned in my review of Fuckstudies. The thumbnails are not very revealing as to what happens in any given scene, downloads sometimes cut out for me. Many of the models are re-named so it makes it hard to find a particular model (Aspen is named Galina for example)A few of the links are broken taking you to the main page instead of where you wanted to go to. All models are 18, even if they have scenes on the site in 2009 and 2011. - Aside from the network wide minor issues this site has a few odd quirks of it's own. Several of the scenes seem to be taken from other sites (some in the network some not.) They have at least one scene from Firstanalquest and a few from other sites. - Along with the non-exclusive content the variation in the scenes is a bit strange. You have a few videos of solo girls with toys, some lesbian, some threesome, some hardcore anal. It all feels a bit chaotic Bottom Line: I've been a member of this network for a long time on and off. My latest membership was probably a year and a half ago and a lot has changed since. They always used to have more unknown models doing pretty hardcore stuff with male models that looked about their age. Overall there was a feeling of home made amateur Russian videos, with kinda crappy lighting and awkward scenes (I remember a few where the male model couldn't get hard enough to properly fuck) This all changed for the better since I was last on the website. The male models seem a lot more confident, the camera work is improved and the WMV high definition (which is not truly HD, but close) was a much needed addition. All the while the girls are still cute and a bit awkward, making for some very hot scenes. Note how I said some hot scenes, because not all scenes are that great. Sadly, a few of the girls are not the most beautiful or young looking models out there, and while I know that what constitutes beauty is very subjective teens with massive fake boobs just seem off-putting on a site such as this. Also girls that seem really not into it or even in pain make for very bad scenes. It puzzles me how on the same site you get girls that positively seem to jump on the guys cock along with girls that look confused and generally uncomfortable with the whole deal. Furthermore, to be honest the lesbian scenes didn't do it for me. On Lezcuties you get some very hot girls who seem all the way into it here maybe every other video seems to have that kind of passion. If you have a lesbian scene you must get girls that are into giving head, sucking nipples and caressing as opposed to just grabbing toys and jamming them in their partner. Since we're talking about inconsistencies among models I guess I should mention the solo action. You have some models that do anal toys, some that fist themselves and some that just use their hands very delicately. Overall it's a bit strange and some more ways of filtering content would be nice. I realize that criticizing models or their level of enthusiasm is a very subjective way to approach a site review, but the inconsistency between how the models act within the same network makes for an odd experience. I guess the fact that scenes are used from different places is to blame for this, but still, more careful selection of the scenes included in the site would help. Also a way to quickly sort the type of scenes would help. It's strange to navigate the site and see 3 solo girls along with a hardcore anal gape all on the same page. Better navigation in general would be nice. The site right now is a bit clumsy and the search failed me several times. For example I couldn't figure out a way to see just the models that appear on one site, probably no one cares about this feature since all sites seem very similar. I for one had hopped that Beauty angels would be more focused on solo, maybe some lesbian action, definitely more stripping and focus on the models. Instead half the scenes are identical to the rest of the network with brutal anal sex to the point where the rest seem out of place. I guess the moral of the story is that you should join the whole network and expect more content similar to hardcoreyouth or analteenangels than met-art or nubiles. The focus is on hardcore action and while the site does deliver, at the end of the day I still felt like something was missing. The rest of the network offers enough other content to compensate but this particular site could benefit from a bit of reworking and a different approach. Overall if you never joined the network or if some of the models seem incredibly attractive to you, a month of membership is not bad. But make sure that you also want the content on Fuckstudies, teenmoviemania and tricky masseur. If you want just anal action, Firstanalquest might be a better fit and if you're looking for hardcore gorgeous teens consider teencorenetwork. 09-08-11  12:16pm Replies (0) Review 85 Freak Bukkake (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - About 18 videos, although new stuff is supposedly updated monthly (they seem to have an on/off calendar whit some years only having a handful of scenes. - The scenes are in Spanish with subtitles, there is a brief intro/ interview and a massive bukkake. - One huge bonus is that almost all of the girls are laughing and seem to be enjoying the experience without the classic porn moans or the fake "look I'm sexy" look. As far as I can tell this trend is true for most of the network, making this a nice place to visit if you're tired of the classic Playboy looking models. - Some very cute girls, and they talk through the performance joking with the guys and the camera man, a very distinct "feel" from other bukkake or oral sex sites (basically this site is the exact opposite of facial abuse or teencoreclub, the girl seems into it or at least she's making the best out of the situation and everyone is having a good time with no humiliation present) Cons: - For some reason streaming was a bit problematic for me and as noted before download managers didn't work well. I used Download them all the add-on for firefox and that seemed to work fine. - Some of the scenes are focused too much on the guys in my opinion, I remember one video where the camera dude goes interviewing the men, which would be fine and all but some of them were really funky looking and some wear masks (which kinda killed it for me...a man in a pig mask should never be present at a bukkake) - I have the same complaints as mbaya, the photos are pretty much useless, and the updates are way too few. The site has great potential and although there is no penetration the scenes are fun to watch and interesting. Bottom Line: For some reason this site felt like the porn website that Kevin Smith would do... maybe it was the fact that a bunch of the videos are introduced by the chubby camera man/ director; maybe it was the fact that I saw a dude in a star wars mask and another in spiderman get-up...maybe the humor and good-natured feel of the scenes just reminded me too much of Jay and Silent Bob. Overall the whole site just felt "right" the perfect combination of disgusting, hot and weird to make me extremely interested, while never crossing into abuse or humiliation. It was a very different site and I am glad I stumbled unto it, after seeing all sorts of abuse and disgusting cum shots I was certain oral sex in porn wasn't my thing. I usually skip the cum as much as possible, especially since the girl looks uncomfortable waiting for that load, trying to be sexy and not look at the camera too much, however this site proved that you can do good semen related porn. I guess I would have enjoyed more scenes, easier navigation (there are adds for reviews and friendly sites crowding my main page) but overall the network felt decent if you like amateurs and a non-standard kind of porn. Considering the discounted price this was simply a deal too good to pass up (again as long as you like amateur girls that talk during the scene, giggle and sometimes look ridiculous) P.S. The reason the site doesn't get an 80 is because of the few scenes 20 porn videos are really not enough for a modern site, although the network makes up for that I still wanted to see more freak-ish bukkake action :) 10-25-10  07:37pm Replies (0) Review 86 Playboy Plus (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Right now the site offers a deal where you can get 3 weeks for free, (in order to cancel you have to call them, but it was all pretty easy) - A ton of playboy extras including montages from the photo-shots, extra pictures and access to old pictorials (Betty Paige, Marlyn and so on) - The images are anywhere between 531px × 800px to 1600 x 1200 px. In other words you get decent quality. - The videos are anywhere from blurry cut into pieces 2 minute segments to beautiful HD more recent shots. Most of the scene can be seen as quick time or WMV and are anywhere between 320p to 720p resolution and then quicktime HD, which I didn't figure out how to download. - You get access to videos from casting calls, amateurs, coeds, classic pictorials, playmates, some 2 girl shots, a decent forum, interviews, a how-they made the covers and a few extra bells and whistles. - The girls look really good, which is to be expected and if you like the magazine you're almost guaranteed to like this Cons: - Inconsistency. The whole site is extremely confusing at times. Each girl (even in the same category) has different types of content, most of the older ones only have photos, others have a short interview, others have just a video. Some you can download, many you can't. Sometimes when you click on a gallery you're taken to a little editorial before you get to the good stuff, other times you don't. - The search function is a bit funky and navigation can get confusing. - A lot of the content cannot be downloaded. - Not as many interviews with the girls as I expected, most of the videos are of the girls posing for the photos, only some playmates get an interview. - Often the site re-directs you to buy a DVD or an older magazine, a bit disappointing as I expected full access to the contents. - Most videos feel like something you'd see on TV, not like a porn video. You get music and cut-aways which are not always necessary Bottom Line: First of all this is a Playboy product, don't expect any type of hardcore (or even softcore touching or masturbation) going into this site. Hell even in the fre photos they have with two two girls the models barely touch, it's all very artsy and classy. This comes with a bonus and a downside. On one hand most of the girls are absolutely gorgeous much better looking that most sites, on the other hand they all seem to have that Playboy look (no small titties, almost always shaved and very skinny, etc.) What was also interesting was that many of the videos felt like a reality show, more than a porn video...I am still not sure if I like this or not. For now I left it under cons because when you have a 3-5 minute video, which a lot of these are, I'd rather see more naked girl and less pan around the room or have a nice intro and outro. Most of the older content is a bit outdated with lower resolutions for both videos and images and no option to download. However the streaming option worked flawlessly and the inbuilt image navigator is perfect, it allows you to set a slide or navigate manually and you can save the photos. For new content you get a lot more bonus with the most recent playmates having a longer (20 min or so) video which contains an interview as well as a sort of story- strip video... I remember for one girl she follows a rabbit around until she ends up naked then we cut to some interview with her, then back to the nakedness, then some more questions and so on. For the rest of the girls you usually just get her stripping naked to music, a few giggles some funny faces and it's a wrap. At the end of it all the site feels like the extras on a DVD, more than the main feature. I mean, don't get me wrong I saved a ton of stuff (since each video is so small they are easy to store and so many of the amateurs and co-eds are adorable) but I don't think I was "really" turned on by any particular video. Here's how I feel about the site by way of analogy: most of the scenes I felt very comfortable reviewing in the middle of my living-room with friends and wife nearby, if you get my drift...it's like the playboy magazine, I'm not embarrassed of having it on my desk and I'll check out the girls, but I probably won't jack-off to it. That being said, as a fan of behind the scenes, seeing some of the girls I saw long ago in the magazine actually talking and moving around was very interesting. I appreciate the very high quality of the images and the videos and while they feel to TV for my taste I wish more porn sites would use well chosen songs and work with the models at least half as well as Playboy does. So, the conclusion? If you are subscribed to the magazine (which is about the same cost like the site) you will probably enjoy the extra content of the site, if the magazine seems like waste of time and money the site will probably do little to change your opinion. 10-16-10  11:47am Replies (0) Review 87 Let's Try Anal (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 310 scenes with updates around 2 times a month (sometimes it seems like you only get one video per month, but 3 the next month so it might vary a bit) - All scenes have download options from 320p to 1080p and almost all scenes also have images (around 50 to 80 photos at 2000 x 1300 or close to it). I was surprised that even old videos seem to have high resolutions (1080), but older images are only 1200x800. - The site layout is very similar to the Babes network and I believe the Reality Kink network. The search could be a bit better, it timed out a few times while I was downloading stuff, and there are some other small issues but overall it's decent and works well. - Most scenes are around 25-30 minutes and are mostly POV. Some scenes have some more wide angles but really the focus here is pretty close up anal action. - Really great models. They have mostly better known girls recently (Lauren Phillips, Hime Marie) but a lot of new models in the older scenes. Cons: - A lot of ads. You get a landing page promoting Reality Kings and the Babes network, ads at the bottom of each page and even when navigating around you get hit with banners going "Want more?! Unlock our 26 premiums sites" - All downloads are not named, so get ready to have a few dozen "scene_1080p.mp4" and "gallery.zip". - Downloads were fast, but I've had the site time out on me a few times, luckily once you log back into a page you can just resume the download and it seems to work fine. - Since most videos are POV don't expect a lot of wide shots, not really a negative for me just something to keep in mind. Also while older scenes seem to mostly have anal some of the newer videos have a lot of oral and PIV sex before getting to the anal. - Older scenes played with the idea of "this is a real couple and he's convincing her to have anal for the first time" more recent scenes seem to follow more standard porn plots so that could be a downside. Bottom Line: The Mofo network is pretty impressive with around 3700 scenes already up and at least one new video added to one of their sites per day. They have some great looking actresses and Let's Try Anal has some of the only anal scenes some of these models have shot. Unfortunately the navigation could be better. When searching for the anal tag in the whole network you only get back 13 scenes... which, considering LTA has over 300 videos just goes to show their search system is seriously broken. Add the almost constant ads the site has everywhere and compared to other networks like Team Skeet or Evil Angel I was left a bit disappointed. Even searching for one particular model turned out to be a bit of a pain since there is no way to see all girls that shot a scene for LTA (when you go to the models page you get all models in the whole network and even searching by name can return wrong results). Something else that might be a turn off is that almost all videos on LTA are entirely POV. Some of the more recent scenes have some tripod shots but for the most part the site tries to sell the idea that this is a couple and you're seeing things from the perspective of the guy convincing his girlfriend to try anal for whatever reason. This plot point was more prevalent in older scenes where there's a lot more prep with toy and finger insertions. Also in a lot of the older shots the girls seem to be in some amount of pain and keep asking the male model to go slower. Finally, these scenes also seem to have a more amateur level to them: the lights are not always perfect, the camera shakes a bit during the action, the girls comment on why is the guy filming them, that sort of stuff. More recent scenes seem to have better lights and camera work as well as more standard porn plots and doing anal doesn't seem to be the same big deal it was in the older scenes. The most recent update (Whitney Wright) doesn't even have the model talk, she just starts stripping and goes into anal sex pretty casually. Now this is clearly subjective and I'm not a fan of "painal", so the way some of the girls acted really didn't work for me, but overall I think the handheld nature of the older videos was more interesting and unique than the more recent scenes. Older videos remind me a bit of Woodman casting scenes or something from Exploited College Girls, while the more recent scenes are more generic. I'll also make a special note about the Joseline Kelly scene where the guy is supposedly playing games on a turned off TV with no console in sight... I know I should care about details in porn, but come on, the TV is off! In conclusion, the network has some pros but some serious cons. The site itself has some great models, but the scenes might not be your cup of tea if you are really turned off by POV shots... it's a bit of a mixed bag. If some of the models look really appealing to you and you never joined I'd say it's worth it, but if you're only interested in the most recent scenes you can probably get similar stuff on other networks. 01-06-19  04:13pm Replies (0) Review 88 Office Obsession (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Despite what the official best porn review says the site only lists 80 scenes today with the latest being uploaded on December 11, 2017. - The scenes have categories and you can search based on those pretty easily, although I wish there were a few more descriptive ones. - Incredibly hot models and a nice mix of European and American girls (tags are not always right but the site lists about 30 European models. The American tag only lists 11 models but there are a lot more American girls here). - Really hot outfits, lots of stockings and high heels and for the most part the outfits stay at least partially on. - Lots of positions (especially since most sex takes place on tables and couches, it's impressive how creative they get) - Great light and editing, lots of nice close-ups mixed with good wide angles. The editing is also for the most part really good with nice music over the intro and smooth cuts whenever needed. Cons: - No updates since 2017 and the site doesn't show in all of their main search functions, pretty safe to say it's dead and no new updates are coming. - Most scenes are boy-girl. They do have a few threesomes and at least one lesbian scene, but don't expect a lot of variance in that area. - While the theme is supposed to be office sex, there are a handful of nurses/ doctor scenes and some other scenes that don't fit the theme ( a maid, a Christmas scene, that kind of stuff), not a big deal breaker, but just don't expect all 80 scenes to be set in an office. - As I noted in my Elegant Anal review some scenes from this network can be a bit short. Almost all scenes here are at or over 30 minutes, but with some having a relatively long set up of 7-8 minutes that can be a bit of a downside. Also no interviews or behind the scenes or any extra content. - Some models have a thick accent which makes some of the set-up a bit awkward to listen to if that bothers you. Bottom Line: I originally joined the babes network for elegant anal and while a lot of the stuff I said in that review applies here as well this site blew me away. Let's start with the good: all scenes are very well filmed with good cuts, nice mix of wide shots and closeups. The models are really gorgeous and while they still are mostly Caucasian and teen looking there is more variation here than over at elegant anal. The website design is modern and responsive, I've had no issues with it on my phone or pc, even with some spotty hotel internet. I wish they had less ads, but overall can't complain. I couldn't really check download speeds since I only had a streaming subscription, but the photo galleries have a nice slideshow function and videos played in high resolution (1080p is the max, no 4k here) with minimum buffering. Overall very happy with the technical side of things. (Categories could be a bit better, but the site is small enough that I could find the videos I liked pretty easily) Unlike elegant anal where I wish there was more attention paid to the setup for the scenes most videos here have a longer intro and the girls keep on their cute outfits. Zazie Skymm leaning backward over a desk and giving a blowjob while still wearing her heels and a half opened yellow shirt is an incredible sight. The way Jade Nile is playful and smirks at the male model when he's trying to ignore her because he's in a conference call is simply adorable. There are so many incredible models here (Dillion Harper, Ella Hughes, Angel Smalls) and there are so many tight skirts, heels and stockings the site really stands out. The biggest negative if of course that it's a dead site. No longer getting updates is a pretty big downside and I haven't been so sad to see a site go in a while. That said the 80 scenes on here are great and while a few of them could be a little less blurry (the Angel Smalls and Janice Griffith scenes in particular seemed very fuzzy for some reason) or would benefit from a few more wide shots, overall the content is top notch. In conclusion if you like the office setting fantasy or just like to see girls partially clothed in stuff they might wear around an office, and are interested in the models I mentioned above, this site alone makes the babes network worth it. Throw in the other sites they have (elegant anal, babes, step mom lessons) and this is worth checking out at least once. I am only giving it a 75 instead of a higher score because there isn't more of the great content they can produce. 12-05-18  08:41pm Replies (0) Review 89 Analized (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 190-200 scenes with regular updates (about 1 video per week) - As the name implies all scenes include anal sex. They are well filmed with lots of closeups, ATM, deepthroating and generally a focus on relatively rough sex (expect some breath play and slapping, but it doesn't really get into BDSM territory). I assume most scenes are directed by James Deen (at least 90 videos feature him) since they all mostly have a similar approach: an few minutes of intro with just the girl moving around (no interview), no real set up (there are some very bare bones stories, but they are easy to ignore) and it quickly transitions into a pretty hardcore scene. - Lots of interesting positions and generally really good looking models that seem to get into the scene. I don't believe they have any girls that are really exclusive or brand new to the industry, but the models they have all give excellent performances. - Overall fast download speeds. Cons: - Pretty difficult to navigate the site, categories are not easy to navigate, no easy way to filter male models from the model view, no easy way to see which scenes have photos or just screencaps. Videos auto-play and the ads are a bit intrusive (sometimes placed right under the video). Overall this is a super bare bones site. The search category works well enough, but it's not enough. - Most scenes are boy-girl, not a lot of variation as far as threesomes or lesbian scenes. Not necessarily a con, but they have a formula and stick to it. - Doesn't seem like there is a good way to grab a zipped archive of the photos (I swear I saw a .zip link on some pages, but it doesn't seem like it's always present. Either way, not a great site if you're looking for photos) - While fast, sometimes when downloading a scene I couldn't stream something else. Bottom Line: I'm a bit conflicted on this site. On one hand many of the scenes are incredibly hot, with the models seeming to really get into it. The sex is rough, but never gets into an uncomfortable territory (there is no puking, not a lot of double anal or "push her limits" kind of sex). The models are mostly well known performers you can see other places as well, but the scenes here are all well shot and often a bit more rough than what the models normally shoot. That's all the positive stuff, the negative is the site itself. For the most part it works, but the design is very bare bones and I've had it timeout on me several times. There are no zipped archives of the photos or screencaps (and often the photos don't contain all the action shown in the videos). When browsing the site, the screen-caps of the scenes are not that descriptive, don't show a preview when you hover over them and if you click into one the video starts playing right away (on my phone often at a much lower resolution than what my wifi can handle) Overall, a lot of small issues that just made me not want to bother logging in and browsing around. Oh and when downloading the videos they have a generic name, instead of the model or the scene name. Technical issues aside the content here is pretty good, as long as you're interested mostly in boy-girl anal. For the most part they don't have interviews, the girls are already mostly naked and there are no BTS videos. It's all pretty standard porn, without a focus of glamour shots like Tushy or a lot of rimming and ass eating like TrueAnal. That said performers do switch positions a lot and there are a lot of great shots of anal against a wall as well as some great ass to pussy shots that look really good. It ultimately comes down to how interested you are in seeing their selection of models in pretty energetic, but relatively standard anal scenes. I've found at least 40 scenes that are absolutely top notch and will make it into my library, but your mileage may vary. 12-02-18  06:37pm Replies (1) Review 90 abbywinters (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Decent amount of content around 5,606 videos (although most girl-girl and boy-girl scenes have three videos each) around 1,427 models and daily updates. - Exclusive models - More recent videos are available in multiple formats up to 1280x720 - All shoots have images available as ziped files, they also have a best of, which highlight the best photos in a nice gallery. - All models look very natural, little make-up many are not shaved, just trimmed almost all look very next door girl - The sex looks very natural, there are some awkward pauses, no insane penetration angles, the blowjobs look realistic. - Overall the site has a fun, softcore feel with some close-ups of vaginas and blowjobs. - A lot of the scenes have a before and after where they interview the models and the girls seem pretty relaxed (although there are some serious language barriers at times) -In a lot of scenes the orgasms are or look real. - Good download speeds - Decent forum with many members Cons: - Almost all of the videos have an old school feel to them, with highlights overblown and colors a bit faded. Even the highest resolutions feel a bit grainy. - A lot of videos are broken up into various parts. Also the before and after interviews could have easily been lumped with the actual scene. - Scenes tend to have a slow intro (I remember one video where the boy texts the guy for 3 minutes) - The site's navigation is decent but takes some getting used to. There are videos labeled "intimate moments" which are basically solo masturbation shots, but there are also "solo shots" and "after dark" shots and when I say shot I don't mean a video I mean a collection of videos... trust me it makes sense but it takes some getting used to - The girls are very natural looking and some could use a bit more make-up. I was expecting the same kind of models Backroomcastingcouch or Exploitedcollegegirls has, but the girls here seemed less attractive (IMO) Bottom Line: Man, this site is something else. I've been a member of most major porn sites over the years and have seen many styles and combinations of content, but Abbywinters stands out as a unique product. If I had to compare it to anything else I'd say it's close to suicide girls in their focus on fun, softcore stuff and community (at least that's how suicide girls used to be back when I joined it a few year ago) The great selling point of the site are the exclusive, natural looking models and the realistic settings and action. The site claims that all scenes are shot in the girls homes with their outfits and only (supposedly) with their boyfriends and/or girlfriends. To cement this claim there are before and after sex interviews where the girls explain what felt good and what they were nervous/ excited about, where they met the boyfriend, how often they have sex in private and so on. Aside from scenes with boy-girl, girl-girl sex the site has "Intimate moments" scenes where supposedly the girls are alone with the camera and can be themselves as well as solo shots where the director interviews them a bit before the action. They also have a handful of "after dark" scenes where the girls are supposed to be dressed in nicer clothes and be more romantic. I hope they get more of these as some of the outfits were very nice, but for right now they only have a dozen or so. Overall the site has a decent premise, unique content and a strong community of followers (and a great forum btw). If you like their style and the girls this place will be a great find and the 3 month membership a steal. However the scenes are far from perfect and you could easily end up disliking the site for how different it feels. The navigation is efficient, but somewhat different from other porn sites and can get a bit confusing at first. The homepage shows the updates, but the preview images are not animated. The easiest way to browse is by looking at shoots and then either video shoots or image shoots (this way you get animated previews), but you can't easily view all models that video or only images and there is no way to search for top rated models or Russian models. Not to mention that older videos tend to be split into 10 parts and even more recent ones often have 2 parts. Speaking of videos, I have to say that the girls look great in photos but in many of the videos they end up looking average, even a bit disappointing. I suspect that in order to maintain the vibe of the site everything is filmed with minimal equipment and it shows. Overexposed shots, some blurry close-ups, the sound of the camera taking photos in the background. It all contributes to make the site feel unprofessional. Don't even ask me how many scenes are shot in an extremely bright room with perfectly clean white walls or how overexposed reds look in half the scenes. Overall for me the technical quality was a huge disappointment. The content itself is decent with a lot of the girls really into it and believable orgasms However it's a bit slow paced for my taste. All sex scenes take several minutes before anyone gets naked. I personally don't see the need for a little make believe story (oh I'm a photographer, get naked. Oh we're watching tv, get naked) when there is a before interview where the girls say they are excited to have sex (especially when some scenes are only 25 minutes long). Speaking of the interviews. Some have captions to translate the interview and those are great, the British accents on some girls are even better, but the broken English most girls have coupled with giggling every two seconds when they don't understand the question can get frustrating and took me out of the mood. At the end of the day I see the appeal of Abby Winters, but I don't think I saved more than a handful of videos. The image sets are very good, but the technical quality and the poor set-up make this feel like old, old Pierre Woodman casting videos. I don't regret joining the site but it's not my cup of tea, I'll stick with Nubiles, which has a similar feel but much better navigation and quality videos. 05-01-12  07:24pm Replies (4) Review 91 Ass Bangers Ball (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 85 scenes each one available as 640x480 WMV or Ipod format, as well as a few images (around 20-30 images per set, not that many but enough to get an idea of the action) - Zipped archives available and images are up to 3072x2048 although the lighting is not always the best in the photos. - Most scenes have two girls that get pounded by several guys. There is a ton of anal, deepthroat and DP. Also there are some serious cumshots with multiple guys covering one girl in semen. Pretty intense stuff. - Access to the rest of the network which has several good sites with multiple updates. A lot of fetish/ extreme action here including BSDM, latex, and fuck machines. - Some very cute models and fun costumes (there are a few masks, a Indians vs cowboys theme) lost of stockings and high heels. Cons: - Last update published 2010/12/02 - Several scenes have strange cuts during the scene. I understand that this is necessary when you are shooting an orgy with multiple people, but it still feels strange when the action suddenly changes. - Some models are really disappointing (older looking, strange body types) More make-up or better light might have helped the scenes. It's also strange to see a very cute girl paired with a woman that is not the same body type/ look. - Navigation is okay, but feels a bit outdated, would like more categories/ search functions. Right now the main search tool is a type in yourself deal, which can be a bit hard if you're new to the site. - Sometimes the focus of the scene is not necessarily on the most interesting action. For example a girl is getting DP'ed but the camera is focused on her giving a BJ. Bottom Line: For the price this network is very decent, as long as you like pretty extreme content, and enjoy BSDM. They have several sites dedicated to rough sex and orgies with this one being a very interesting one. Almost all scenes feature two girls and several guys (there are one or two video with only one girl and 4 or 5 guys, but for the most part expect dozens of dudes.) The focus is on anal sex and DP, although several times I believe only one of the girls does anal. I say I believe because the action can get pretty confusing, which is understandable when you have 12 guys and 2 women having sex. However, the scene editing doesn't help the situation. In one scene we cut away from a sex scene to a shot of the other girl crying out in what seems genuine pain, we cut back to the sex and then back to the distressed girl after she presumably got some more anal lube. That is 4 cuts within maybe 2 minutes, completely unnecessarily in my opinion. Unfortunately this happens a lot in the more recent scenes. They cut from one girl to the other almost every few minutes and seem to have a lot of close-ups of either one of the girls face or her genital area then cut and switch around. I understand the difficulties of filming an orgy and I have to say that all things considered they do a pretty good job, but less editing would have been preferred. It's not like the scenes are incredibly long, most of them come in around 32 minutes which I believe is on the short end considering how much material they could get from two girls having sex with multiple guys. Aside from the way the videos are edited the site doesn't seem to update anymore, so that's a big downside, but considering they have almost 100 intense scenes I am okay with the amount of content (just don't plan to spend a whole year on this site) The final issue I had with the site was that the model quality is hugely varied. They have some incredible looking girls that I couldn't believe were ready to do this kind of action, but on the other hand they have some ladies that would be more at home on a big and beautiful site or on a mature page. Combining the two types of models in one scene can make for some awkward moments, especially since they like to cut from one girl to the other pretty fast. Speaking of the two girls, I was a bit surprise to see that in several scenes the two females don't really interact that much. The focus is mostly on the two girls getting pounded by the males, almost separately from each other. At times you could easily forget that there were two women involved in most videos. Aside from the points above the site was a very nice experience. Downloads worked fine ans streaming was excellent. I wish they had more images available for each scene, but the few they do have are all pretty hardcore action so no major complaints there. The navigation and design of the site felt a bit outdated, but still very functional and while they could use a more improved model page or a category search I had no issues previewing and finding content. The bottom-line: A good site for anyone who likes orgies and hardcore sex. Worth checking out for a month or two, especially if the rest of the network looks appealing to you. 11-14-11  03:42pm Replies (0) Review 92 My Teen Oasis (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 550 videos with a new scene update every 7 days. Most videos are around 720 x 528 with some of the older stuff only around 480. - Everything is available in a multitude of formats and WMV as well as MP4. They also offer ipad and smartphone formats. - Streaming and downloading worked just fine for me. No time-out issues even on weak connections and no major navigation issues. - Access to the whole devils films network along with this (in total you get several thousand scenes) - A lot of hardcore action, almost half the scenes are anal and I'd say all involve deepthroat and pretty rough hardcore. - They also offer images with some scenes, but not as many as the videos and not as good looking. Overall the photos are a bit of a disappointment. The videos are the main feature here. - The videos have categories and you can quickly sort scenes (all anal, all handjob, etc) - Some very cute latina and white models (Lexi belle, Bree Olsen, etc) Cons: - The site has mostly videos taken from Silverstone DVD, but it's not really the same site, as TBP review suggests. There are some scenes from Pink visual and Combat zone as well as a few other solo scenes that are not available on the Silverstone DVD site. I doubt any of this content is exclusive though. - Several scenes are mis-tagged (they claim there is anal in the scene but there is none or they don't tag the anal, but there clearly is some, one or two wrong actors are tagged, small stuff mostly but nonetheless) - Very varied types of scenes. The older Fresh euro flesh or pick-up lines scenes are very amateur-ish and look like the old Rocco or Woodman scenes. The more recent HD scenes are more similar to big network content like reality kings. Makes it kinda hard to know what you get in each scene. -No model index. Making it kinda hard to find all scenes by one girl. There is an actor category break-down, but it's not the best search function Bottom Line: For around 10 dollars you get access to about 20 sites with somewhere around 11,000 scenes in total. Most of the videos are hardcore and there are tons of European amateur girls doing pretty intense action. If you enjoy hardcore action this network is a great deal, especially because of the Rocco Siffredi site which has some impressive action (although devils films is very good as well). A lot of the models in the network are pretty young looking and this site seems to collect several of the teen scenes from other sites along with some content from DVDs by other companies and some scenes that seem to be shot for the web and don't belong to any DVD series (I'm thinking of a few scenes entitled My HD teens... not sure if that's exclusive to them or what, maybe someone can clarify in the comments). Maybe it's optimistic but it seems the more recent stuff is all different from the rest of the network and I believe that as the site keeps growing they will add more and more content that is not on other network sites. I also wanted to mention, again, that they are uploading regularly again with a new scene every seven days. The TBP review is a bit outdated in that aspect. When all is said an done I'd say maybe 60% of content is identical to SilverstoneDVD and the rest is new. The other negative point about this site and the entire network in fact is that they don't care very much for images. Most photosets are small (around 30 images or so) a lot of them are just screen caps to make things worse there are no zipped archives. Now that we cleared up what the site is and what the main negative points are let's take a look at the positive side. The videos here are pretty good with some seriously hot models doing intense action. The girls are cute and several do anal as well as deepthroat. I'd say other sites in the network have even better content but for the most part what we have here is decent (not as much DP and ass too mouth as other sites, but nonetheless.). The content can be roughly divided into older DVD's which are European amateur stuff with very little story and about 20 minutes or so of action. Then there is the more recent stuff which is good quality, but a bit generic. (Girl tries out for porn, pervy coach tricks cheerleaders into sex, sexy nurse, etc) I hope that going forward they keep the spirit of the older stuff but use new hot girls. All things said and done the site is a nice bonus, but not really a main attraction yet. If they keep up the regular updates of content that is not available on other network sites they will become great pretty soon. That being said both Rocco Sifredi's site and devils films have tons of young adult content so you won't miss out by joining this network. 10-30-11  09:33pm Replies (0) Review 93 Teen Core Club (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: - This network continues to have some of the best looking young girls, doing very hardcore scenes - A lot of new faces in porn (they somehow continue to find girls that don't show up on other porn sites. I believe this site was the first to show Aspen, Isabel, Eva and a few other popular Russian girls that have since shown up many other places. Still It's nice to see them here first) -Each site has a niche and delivers what it promises (ass to mouth, DP, etc.) But all of the sites are hardcore and there is a lot of anal and deepthroat (In many of the more recent scenes they make sure the girls make-up runs down their faces so they look all disheveled). -The videos are pretty good quality (colors are a bit funky, but nothing too major) and you get a ton of images (but no zip files, so you have to use a site ripping tool to get all images) -Simple navigation and layout that can be a pain in the ass, but does work okay most of the time Cons: -Very simple navigation, no way to search for one model across all sites. Now way to preview the videos and streaming is a joke (it leads to another download page) -The site doesn't load half the time (As I write this the main website is down, but I can log into a few of the member sites) -They log you out at random intervals and customer support is all but non existent. -There are no different options for videos so sometimes I have a 2 gb file to download other times it's 300mb... you never know. It sucks when you want to watch a quick video of one girl only to realize it will take an hour to download her particular scene. -No overall network access (if you're used to 21sextury this network will disappoint). -Sometimes the videos are too much to the point. I enjoy scenes with no long stories, but every since scene here goes from fully clothed girl to dick in her but within 5 minutes... It's like they are always racing to get it done. Not to mention they go through the same positions Bottom Line: I believe I mentioned this before in almost all of my reviews of this network. The girls are hot and they do incredible hardcore. The make-up team doesn't over do it so the models don't look like the average Hustler porn stars (I hate it when a site takes a cute 20 something year old and plaster her with make-up...why hide the beauty? WHY? anyhow, this site doesn't do that so kudos to them). The light and settings aren't all pink and bubble gum cute but aren't the run of the mill porn either. In other words you won't feel like a pedophile, but you know you're not watching mainstream Hustler porn either. Add to everything I mentioned above the fact that these girls do great deepthroats, anal, DP, now they are starting to add threesomes... overall this network should be the best out there. Notice how I said should be... the sad truth is that their webmasters don't give a shit. The sites feel old, and in over a year of membership I haven't seen any significant updates or improvements. The downloads crash, the site auto logs you out, it won't load properly and there is no network overarching website (you have to log into each site individually and there is no way to get all scenes by one model.) To make things worse, instead of fixing what they have the owners decided to simply add new sites that are run just the same. In one year I saw Maketeengape, cumholic, defiled18, hardcoreyouth and a handful of other sites many abandoned since, some still updating occasionally. Basically it feels like they only care about saying they have +47 sites bonus even if most have 10-15 scenes and will never be updated again. There are also some other minor annoyances. All videos are named the same so if you batch download them you have to go back and re-name everything. Downloading images is a pain (use neodownloader to crawl their site and grab everything, trust me it's much easier than anything else) Also the images are plentiful, to the point where you get too many of them. I mean there are 20 images of the exact same scene with just a small variation (I feel like their photographer simply sets the camera on auto shutter and shoots 1000 images of each scene) I love the photos from sites like nubiles and this is just a disappointment by comparison. Another small issue for me is the male model, who is the same in every scene. He simply doesn't look like he cares, he goes through the motions almost mechanically, he also has a huge scar on his arm and I know this is nitpicky but why can't they get another guy once in a while? The older videos have a bunch of different dudes and somehow it makes it look more interesting. I guess since I'm complaining about the content of the videos I might as well mention that they get repetitive very fast. Don't get me wrong I love seeing different girls, but why do they all have to go through the same motions. I am at a point where I can skip into almost any video on this site and guess what will happen. Minute 10 usually means anal from behind, minute 12 the dude will jump off her and we get some ass to mouth for 3 minutes or so, then some reverse cowgirl anal... and so on... The 21 sextury network which also brings a ton of anal videos somehow manages to make it interesting and different. Here the girls are on a boat, here they are in fishnets, here there are two of them and so on... a bit of variation would be nice. At least in the more recent videos the camera man asks the girls a few questions which seem to confuse them more than anything. I guess it's a step in the right direction nonetheless. Oh, now you can also get the scenes on DVD so there are a bunch of banners advertising just that, I don't know who still buys DVD's but I guess that's nice? Why not download the scene and burn your own though... especially since the streaming is non-existent. Anyhow, overall I gave the network a lower score than last time I reviewed it. The fact that one year has passed and nothing changed on their technical side is not good. It used to be that this was the bets place for hardcore young sex, but now you can look at many other networks who are growing and don't charge almost $50 for similar content ($9 for 21sextury anyone?) Sorry to say that if they don't improve their act soon I'll have to move on... such a shame though because the girls are incredible... such a shame. 08-27-11  10:59am Replies (5) Review 94 Jerk-Off Pass (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A bunch of different sites, with focus on hardcore action. At last count there where about 30 websites in here, each one with around 1600 scenes in total. - Mostly young looking girls and a lot of fresh faces - relatively decent download speeds for me (I was a member way before, almost 6 months now and recently re-joined to complete my collection, never had a problem getting videos) - Videos are decent size, but nothing Hd (around 300x 600 and only come as wmv) - very simple navigation, and I do mean very simple, to the point where it's a con, however you can access all sites from one main portal and you can browse all scenes easily. - there is access to some live cams, nothing too crazy, but they are there if you're really into that kinda stuff. I just checked that they worked and never went back :P Cons: - the extras are ads to other sites :P - the whole network feels like a lesser version of teencoreclub - I don't think they update the sites anymore, I can't remember if cumsumption cocktail was there the last time but I think they had about 1600 videos for about a year now. - The picture galleries are for the most part poor quality and not available as zipped files. - The action, while almost always hardcore is somewhat different from site to site, some have a short interview, some are straight to the action. Some girls are kinda funny some are annoying. The only overall drawback is more of a personal opinion, that there is a bit too much focus on showing the girl's buthole and less of her face, but meh It doesn't really kill the scene for me. Bottom Line: Overall the network is not bad some cute girls and some less attractive ones tossed together in a very hardcore mix. Some scenes that look great and some that left me feeling bad for the girl (some of them sound so stupid sigh...) However the huge drawback of no photos (unless you're going to sit there and download them one by one), no streaming, only one download option, lack of updates or update info at the very least. Well if you look at the larger picture this site starts to look pretty bad, especially compared to teen core club which shares the hardcore aspect and the navigation. So my honest advice is check that network out first then, if you really love it come over here. That being said, some of the videos, especially school bus chicks are famous around the internet and you might want to have the full version in your collection (that's why I joined it again :) Oh, one final annoying point, all videos save with the same name so have fun re-naming everything or having a bunch of i01-099.wmv videos. 07-22-10  05:11pm Replies (0) Review 95 iTeen Video (0) 75.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: -around 1200 videos (if I counted correctly) Each video available in Wmv, Mp4, flv but each one is a different resolution with Wmv 720x576 or HD 1280x720, flv a decent 600 something and the rest a horrible 320 x200. - good looking models from the Teensexmania, teensexmov, oldnyoung and a few other sites. No exclusive material that I could find, however it was nice to see all the network content in one place and easily navigable. I wish they would incorporate all the videos they have in this site, then it would be truly worth it. - I could access the bonus sites of the network without any trouble which was very nice, although much of the content overlapped. - a good collection of hardcore videos, but too little anal IMO. - stills from videos are available but they are not really worth it. Cons: - the search function is a bit funky and I wish there was a more detailed preview. Right now all you get is a blurry image from the video that often doesn't do justice to the model (especially when it's just a close-up of her ass) - videos download with cryptic numbers instead of names, which makes them harder to sort - a separate models page would have been nice, also many of the video descriptions are very poor and have funky characters instead of letters - I wish I could download wmv's at a 600 resolution as the HD is too big, but the flv plays funky in some media players. Bottom Line: The overall site is not that bad if you've never been a member of teensexmovs or teensexmania or any of those sites, but if you have most of their content this is not really worth it. It's a nice way to navigate all sites at once but the previews are very poor as they don't show more than one image. I often downloaded a scene and discovered the girl was nothing like what I imagined. On the other had I was very surprised to discover some very hot models here. You just have to dig a lot. The bonus section is worth it, however as I could access the whole teensexmovs network with no trouble. Overall with better presentation this site would be awesome, as it stands it's just another way for the network to showcase the videos they already have. I would recommend it if you've never been in this network before, otherwise there are other more interesting russian teen sites out there. 01-13-10  01:39pm Replies (1) Review 96 Cable Guy Sex (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - around 60 HD videos (1280 per 800 I believe) as well as access to the whole HD porn pass network. - around 20 photo galleries with around 100-200 photos each at 685px × 1024px. No zipped files - if you have a fetish for a cable guy this is the place for it. The guy will wear a hardhat most of the time and the girls occasionally do nibble on the actual cable. Other than that this is a pretty regular porn site, with some group sex and some good old guy on girl. I have no clue as to why this deserved an independent site as opposed to being part of geek girl sex or teenage whores, but I guess it does... - most models are hot and the videos are very good quality although the content is pretty standard... - easy navigation and good servers. - the network is awesome if you want HD porn. One of the best out there. Cons: - scenes are rather short and they are often cut into multiple parts so the actual number of videos you get is not 60 but more like 25. - the image gallery isn't really worth it. - videos all save with generic name...had to go back and rename everything - does anyone actually have a fetish for cable guys? I mean the whole pizza delivery guy was kinda funny but this site borders on weird. It's a niche that didn't need filling I feel like... nonetheless as part of the HD network this is an okay deal, just adding some more sex scenes. Bottom Line: This site is rather small compared to others in this network and the content isn't really that unique or special that it would motivate a sale. I guess it's another website in the network and maybe it can tip the balance towards buying a membership, but not by much. The scenes are good and the HD is awesome (I have never seen genitalia glisten like they do in these videos...very cool) but there isn't anything above regular porn here. Expect middle of the road material with average girls, but in HD. I said this before but I'll repeat it becuase it bears keeping in mind. This is a big site and it feels like one. The content is similar to what you'd expect in Playboy or Hustler. It's hot and the girls look gorgeous but most of the time they are middle of the road. If you have a particular preference for anal, rough, teen, lesbian, mature, etc. then you can probably find a better site for the same price. If you don't know what kinda porn you like or if you like the big magazines but don't want to join them, then HD porn pass is for you. (Thy also have a great Indian porn section...) Otherwise, and especially if the HD doesn't sound amazing keep looking. Personally, I only came back to this site due to the bonus section of Teen Models (join it and get the HD porn pass for free...much better deal...) All in all, a good site that targets middle of the road people and cable guy fans. 10-17-09  05:34pm Replies (0) Review 97 Anal Hell (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 114 videos in HD (1200 x 720), standard WMV (380 x 200) and quicktime format. Available for download (went around 400kb to 2 mb when I had two videos going) as well as streaming (which was pretty fast). However many videos are truncated into 2 parts. - About 180 photo galleries (683px × 1029px) with somewhere around 200 photos per set. No zipped archives that I could find, but some very hot photos that were not available as videos (as far as I could tell). - Many hot, but well known models. Both male and female (Hillary Scott, Lucy Lee, James Dean, etc.) - The scenes are pretty intense with some serious gape and a lot of anal action. Most of the scenes have some sort of story (boyfriend brings a flower over, sex ensues pretty quick) - Access to a whole network of HD videos. Including Teenage Whores, Just Legal Babes, Geek Girls sex and a bunch of other HD stuff (65 sites in total including some nice solo sites). Also you get some discounts for other sites. Cons: - I liked this sites design but it lacks some basic features such as a search by category for example. The site has anal with toys, group sex and deep throating but you have to dig for it. They don't even offer a model search. Also I would like a little bit more integration within the network, the site shows recent updates from all sites but no network wide search. - Couldn't find updates schedule, although the updates do happen (almost weekly). Why not brag about it? - Personally I found most of the stuff on the site not really that arousing. I have seen most of the models have anal before (the scenes were new, but the models are mostly well known women) If you want to see fresh faces or real young adults this isn't really the place. Also the scenes are very brief (around 12 minutes each) with no time devoted to developing the story or characters involved (aka no interviews or more than a smudge of storyline) - Each video saves as vid_01.wmv so you have to go back and rename stuff Bottom Line: Overall this site delivers what it promises: high quality videos and anal. But there is room for much improvement, a more user friendly interface, more variety in the scenes (not necessarily as in having the girls do the crazy stuff from Anal Acrobats but as in having more plot, maybe an interview, maybe more outfits. Stuff that would bring the site out from under the "Generic" tag where it is right now.) As it stands, right now, I wouldn't necessarily spend more than a month's worth of membership here. Evil Films has much more intense action and places like First Anal Quest have a lot more variation in models and outfits. However, this doesn't mean that the site is bad, along with its network it's a decent deal, especially if you're not that into anal as to want only a site dedicated to that niche. There are lesbian anal scenes, solo scenes here as well a many classic sex scenes. Furthermore if you want crystal clear image this is one of the best HD sites out there. But don't expect the kind of exclusive models and close connection to the actors that other, smaller websites offer. This is a big network and it feel like one. It's almost like the Playboy or Hustler network in that regard, with a feeling of old school, classic porn to it. If that makes any sense. Either way. I hope my review was at least somewhat useful and please feel free to ask any questions you may have. P.s. Each scene is about 12 minutes long so what they gain in high quality they loose in length or video. This also means that if a scene is longer you will have 2 or 3 pieces...a tad bit frustrating but it probably made sense for the webmasters at some point... 09-18-09  03:13pm Replies (0) Review 98 Teen Bitch Club (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Approximately 132 scenes each one with Mp4 (needs quicktime) videos in either high or medium quality as well as around 50 or less high quality photos (853px × 1280px, also I'd like to say that the light and camera they use is very good. I'm not a fan of photos but this site had some good ones IMO) and around 200 screenshots (720px × 540px the problem with the screenshots being that theya re clearly taken by an automated program, some of them cutting out the girl's head or part of the action. Theya re mostly good to get an idea of how the movie is going to be.) - Each video has a trailer, which is really helpful when deciding what to download. - Okay navigation (it loads fast and there are many options. You can stream movies, download clips or the whole movie. They also have zipped archives for photos) - Good customer service (it's easy to contact them and they responded fast, solving my issues with the streaming) - Good streaming, although a bit slow to load on my machine. Cons: - The models are a bit disappointing. I joined this network mostly for Lez Cuties which has a ton of rather unknown (although if you see a lot of Russian porn you must know Sasha and Autumn), barely legal-looking girls. However this site has a bunch of not so young looking girls that are mostly well known porn stars (Eva Angelina, Bree Olsen, Allyson Pierce, etc.) These girls are hot but I've seen a lot of them before. Then again I guess the site is named Teen Bitch Club...not New Members of the Teen Bitch Club. - The navigation on the site could have been better. There was no way to filter "anal" or "group sex" videos from the rest. Although there are some hot examples of both hidden in the site. - I have never seen such unflattering preview photos when browsing for movies. They seem to prefer photos where the girl's face is contorted into a big "O" or she just looks funky (eyes half closed, can't really see the girl because there is a huge close-up on her vagina, etc.) Bottom Line: This site has me thorn. On some days I hate it on others I love it. Sometimes the download speed is ridiculously slow on others it jumps up to 1mb per video. They have that great trailer (I really enjoy trailers for videos, just so I know what I'm downloading)but then they choose to use horrible photos for previews. A girl I thought was hideous turned out to be Lexi Belle when I actually paid attention to the video description. Why? because their preview when browsing offers usually 4 photos one big one and 3 small ones. The big one is usually the girl with a ridiculous face and the other ones tend to be close-ups of genitalia. Maybe this works for others but for me (I watch porn mostly for the girl's face) it was disappointing. However, when your biggest problem with a site is the bad preview photos it means it's doing the rest correctly, right? After all the site delivers what it promises: It has plenty of good content of young models being fucked. It even has some anal and group sex scenes...but then why doesn't it let me search those scenes by adding a button that filters a scene by category? Well at least is has a model search which is very nice. But then again most models don't have any info and I found one or two models where the only photos they have are screenshots (for one girl it was the same screen cap repeated three times.) So what is the bottom line? Good videos with good looking girls but not a lot of new faces. Good quality but a bit of frustration (mp4 format) and decent navigation with a a few mistakes. A decent website if you like teen-looking girls, but not the best by far. The network access does compensate that though, making this a good enough site. Look through the free tour and if you see more then 5 hot models or scenes sign-up it will be worth it. 09-06-09  03:02pm Replies (3) Review 99 Little Hell Cat (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Very cute, lolita-looking, teenage girl doing all the shots with one single guy who is presumably her boyfriend. This makes the site feel like Little Lupe but more intimate (there is only one couple so it feels more realistic) As a bonus he is not ugly either :) - About 15 videos of 960x540 (available for download as wmv in one file between 200 and 550 mb or as segments of about 100 mb each) and 16-17 photo shots (each video has a photo session of anywhere in between 500 and 900 photos, each one 1280px × 853px. Sadly the photos are not available as zip) - Decent download speeds of about 400kb to 1mb - The couple does a lot of different things including anal (presumably for the first time although it's doubtful), light bondage, sex in a car and in a clothing booth (at least they claim so) they play with food and have sex in a bathroom on top of the toilet. They even have one scene where he is dressed as a clown if you like clown porn... - The girl is very flexible and passionate Cons: - The navigation can get annoying as it slows down when you're downloading a video or two. Also you can't search for a certain type of video, and you have to rely on the rather poor and similar descriptions of the videos or the screencaps. - The site is updated but you can't find out when the next update is or how regular the updates are. (About one per month I'd hazard...although the network is updated more often) - Although the couple tries it's just the two of them so far so the scenes can get a bit boring. Even if they spice it up by starting a video straight with sex or if they have a nice long foreplay it's only so much they can do...then again that's true for porn in general :) Bottom Line: The website suffers from the same problems like the other Teen Core Club sites: the navigation is slow at times and more options would be nice, all videos save with the same name so you have to be careful not to overwrite something and you can feel a certain lack of care for details (for example the girls 18th birthday party which ends up in a sex scene is placed in the middle of the website, nothing wrong there but why not make it the first video on the site, sort of like her introduction into the whole porn business? It's a small detail but it's stuff like that which makes you feel the webmasters care). Overall, the scenes are hot, the girl is passionate and the foreplay is very nice( in the scenes where it's present I found it to be just enough, not too much and not to little). The girl is very adorable (if you like barely legal girls that look almost too young to be in porn) and many scenes are incredibly arousing (her so-called first anal or the sex scene where she starts off in her pajamas and has an orgasm as he gives her head). Furthermore the camera work while not always lighted the best way is pretty well done with many angles and a certain home-made feel to it that ads atmosphere while still keeping a good detail level. Finally, the fact that Little Hellcat comes with access to a network packed with similar content (hardcore teenagers) makes this a good deal. However before joining this site one should consider the rest of the network and make sure they like what they see on the bigger websites like Try Teens or Girls Got Cream. The content here is pretty limited and while it's good quality after you see the little hellcat one or five times you might get bored. Other single model websites can offer a wider selection and more variety in the scenes (I'm thinking of Little Lupe or The Milton Twins) If you do join make sure to watch the anal scene and the pajama one they are in my opinion some of the best the site has to offer. I hope I was helpful and don't hesitate to send a message if any questions arise. 08-12-09  12:29pm Replies (0) Review 100 Jurassic Cock (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - around 59 videos, photos and screencaps in wmv and mpg (both around 512x288) as well as ipod, psp and xbox formats. Images can be downloaded as zips and are roughly around 850px × 566px. - Download speed was around 700kb-3mb for 2 videos - hot teens, who seem to have fun while shooting the scenes. Also most of the older gentlemen are not 80 year old's that couldn't hold a hard-on, they look around 40-50 and very capable of having a good sex session. - most scenes have a bit of a story behind them. This teen is working as a mechanic, the other one is a nurse. The acting is not amazing but, as with most sites in this network, it's funny. I remember one scene where the horny gardener pops up at the window while the girl is having and interview. She tries to hush him away but they end up having sex...random, unbelievable but amusing and maybe a bit kinky... - the site is updated every two weeks on Mondays - access to the whole porn pros network which has many similar videos. Cons: - site pages load slowly, (not always and without any apparent pattern. Images that won't load one day will load the next) - ads on pages (sometimes annoying other times can be ignored, depends what add loads) - couldn't figure out the streaming player. It works on every other site out there except this one. - content can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: Overall the casting choices of this site are good: hot teens and old guys who sometimes are also famous (Ron Jeremy is in there). The scenes are fun and well shot with a good combination of close-ups and far shots. However unlike other sites in the porn pass network this one doesn't have that much content to offer. 59 videos is enough to keep one busy but not for a long while, especially considering that there are only a limited number of male models. The stories make the whole site more interesting and I found it amusing to see how one girl's solution to a man having a heart attack was to give him a blow-job, but in all honesty it's up to you if the stories work or not. If you like cheesy porn plots that are funny and not that well acted than this is the site for you. However if you want more realistic scenes or scenes where the girls don't want to have sex, this is not a good place to look for it. All girls are willing and many initiate the sex, not your regular old man corrupting young innocents here. In fact I believe in at least 3 videos the case is the other way around. the teen is in some sort of trouble so she seduces the older man into having sex... The bottom line is that I enjoyed the scenes here but I wouldn't have joined this site it was on it's own. with the whole network behind it yes, but only because (sometimes) I enjoy cheesy porn plots and hot, teenager-looking girls that are willing to have sex and take the initiative. 08-05-09  04:16pm Replies (0) Shown : 76-100 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.37 seconds.