Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : dracken (0)

Feedback:   All (678)  |   Reviews (143)  |   Comments (107)  |   Replies (428) Other:   Replies Received (318)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 Nebraska Coeds (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - The site claims to have 1236 Movies and 283 models and as far as I can tell that's pretty accurate, you can go back all the way to videos from 2004 (and surprising enough, a lot, if not all of the older videos have remastered versions which are very good 1280x720 quality) - Regular updates (I'd say maybe every 3-5 days there's a new video going up) - Not all videos have photos, but those that do have a very useful zipped archive and even a larger resolution zipped archive. - Definitely amateur models, don't think I recognize any of them, but overall the selection is pretty good with a range of body types and looks. - The content is mostly girls masturbating, but there is a lot of variation in location, toys used and length of the scene. There are a lot of videos from festivals showing nude women dancing or wet t-shirt contests, decent amount of girl girl action (hard to navigate the categories, but maybe about 100 scenes), about 40 or so scenes of blowjobs. Cons: - The site looks dated, the search is not great and the categories are not always that descriptive or easy to navigate. - The model page is pretty bare bones, it's useful to see all scenes from one model in one place, but they often don't even have a photo of the model, just her name and how many scenes she is in. - Camera work is pretty bad at times with a lot of jerky movements and a lot of scenes have a very distinct "college" feel. There are several scenes of weed smoking, the camera man making bad jokes about the sex toys and several of the girls don't really seem that interested in the action. - Slow download speeds on the largest videos (as far as I can tell these are pretty much uncompressed high bit-rate videos that are not that different from the HD mp4's and the site does warn you it will be slow so there's that) Bottom Line: I'm a fan of amateur content and several, if not all of the models here are clearly not professional porn actresses. There is a very distinct "unscripted" vibe and from the way several scenes go together I get the sense that the site owner finds girls who are willing to film and they hang out for a day or so shooting a bunch of different videos. This site in particular has the solo or lesbian scenes while some of the more hardcore stuff goes to After Hours Exposed. Because of this the scenes on here end up really varied: there are some interviews with the girls, some shower scenes, some videos where the girls are already naked and it feels like they just finished another scene. It's a bit of a mixed bag that doesn't follow any strict steps, for better or worse. The same thing extends to the models and videos as well. As with any site that uses mostly amateur girls some are more comfortable and fun, while a few seem a bit stiff and awkward. Some scenes, especially when there's natural light in the room end up looking really good, while in some scenes the light and angles are not really that great. Overall a mixed bag, I'd say a mostly positive mixed bag, but don't go in expecting the standardized production quality of a large budget porn network. Something else that didn't really work for me, but I'm sure is a selling point of the site is the focus on a "party vibe". For example, there are a lot of photos and videos from festivals and "spring break". Some of the girls in these are really cute, but I didn't feel like it was really worth paying subscription to see a few seconds of some topless girls at a fest. Luckily, there are plenty of other videos with more explicit content so it's easy to ignore this content. All of that said, I got access through a membership at Backroom Casting Couch and as part of that network this is certainly a good deal. Between ExCoGi (Exploited College Girls), the Casting Couch HD content and this site I can't think of a better network for amateur models. It's not big budget porn so it doesn't have that level of polish and there are some rough edges, but there are certainly several really hot videos here and there is so much content it's easy to skip the stuff that doesn't work for you. P.S. for what it's worth I haven't had any of the issues with downloads or videos not playing that RagingBuddhist mentioned in his review, but your mileage may vary. 12-04-18  11:19am Replies (0) Review 102 Need A Pee (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - There are many videos (151) at various sizes the most recent ones are all 16:9 Widescreen and come in 864*480 around 30mb | 864*480 around 50mb | 1280*720 - 80.6mb The older videos are a bit fuzzy especially at the very small resolutions but they tend to be only a few mb. - 33 sets of photos around 100 images each at 1200 dpi * 1200 dpi The photos for the most part were awesome. The best part of the site by far. - many other bonuses such as a blog, a forum (pretty active too), audio stories and a free by-weekly webcam show. All and all quite a large mount of bonus and the model (Rebeka Dee) puts a lot of effort into keeping in touch. Much Kudos for her effort to stay close to her fans. - every video is of model peeing, usually outdoors, sometimes peeing herself. Usually the girl seems forced to pee and there is no toilet around (hence the name of the site) - pretty decent variation in videos, very interesting for pee fans Cons: - there is something that lacks from the videos on this site. There is a lot of variation as Rebeka pees her tights, her underwear, into glasses and cups and on a glass table. There are also a bunch of "debut girls" peeing and a few models peeing public. But that is about it. The models don't play with themselves very much and the whole scene is usually focused only on peeing. Rarely do we have the model talk or strip before peeing. Then again this might be a bonus of you only enjoy seeing a girl pee. I just wish she would include access to her regular solo site with this membership or give us more sexy videos. - although there are quite a few other models guest staring they don't have a page of their own or some sort of model search. Also a search just in general would have been nice. Bottom Line: This site is definitely something else. If you like peeing, especially outdoors peeing and don't care that you probably won't see a boob in any of the videos this is the place for you. There are all sorts of peeing related scenes, even some golden showers with cute girls (the best were in the photo section and only a few of them; mostly it's girls peeing themselves or urinating in public and one or two guys being peed on by Rebeka). The site offers a lot of bonus content and the main model really tries to be close to her fans, which makes this a great solo site in my opinion. But offering her regular solo site as a bonus would have made this deal a million times better. More diversity in the action within the videos could help a lot. A little foreplay, maybe some slow stripping. Maybe also more dialogue. The webcam archives are the only place Rebeka really talks. Also a search by model and more golden showers could help, but maybe that's just me. Oh, if you join make sure to check out the video where she starts off playing with a dildo and ends up pissing. It's the best on the site and more like it would have been appreciated. I really enjoyed this page and felt like the models were having a good time doing the shots unlike other pee sites were the girls look miserable. All and all if you like pee or seeing a girl wet her panties this is a great site to check out (especially if you like how Rebeka looks) but if that is not your cup of tea this site won't change your mind. 09-29-09  03:24pm Replies (1) Review 103 New Sensations Network (0) 79.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Thousands of videos most of them in pretty high resolution (but of course older scenes are only around 640x360) Updates are also relatively frequent, but it might not be your specific niche (while I was a member they updated mostly incest themed scenes) - Photos are available in archived zip files but they are only screen caps and sometimes you get 30 images, sometimes there's 200 with several virtually identical shots. Overall I wouldn't join this network looking for quality images. - Some great scenes in a variety of niches. The Ella Nova and Samantha Rone double anal scenes are a must buy in my book, but they have some really well done parodies as well and the Anya Olsen Eliza Janes lesbian scene is incredible. Besides the awesome models all recent scenes I've checked out are very well shot with a lot of variation in angles and action. They also mostly use soft lighting that gives scenes a nice mood. - The network goes on pretty deep discount pretty often. Cons: - As other people pointed out the search function is not the best and finding the scenes you're interested in can be a bit of a pain. - Since they still seem to be focused on DVD's sometimes you get several updates in one niche one after another, then no similar content for a few weeks. Also for some DVD's you only have the option to download the whole movie instead of individual scenes (this is mostly an issue with their XXX parodies) - The type of content is a bit all over the place, they have some really intense double anal scenes for example, but also some more standard, almost romantic scenes. There are some DVD's that feature one actress in multiple BDSM scenes (The Submission Of Emma Marx) and other DVD's that are focused on the daddy niche. The variation is nice, but also makes it a bit hard to recommend the network to anyone who is interested in one particular sub genre. - I've had some issues with downloads timing out, nothing too bad but a bit frustrating. Bottom Line: New Sensations reminded me of Videobox or Bang, one of the networks that have a lot of DVD's from several directors. While I believe most, if not all of their content is shot for them exclusively it's clear they're ripped from DVD's so you get a wide ranges of themes, types of action and even quality. For example the ASS FULL OF DIESEL DVD is focused on close up anal action with very little set up, while the James Deen scenes are almost identical in style to the videos he puts up on his own site and Analized. The older Mike Adriano scenes feature his style of POV with lots of lube while some other scenes feel like they were shot for Teen Fidelity and so on. This makes it a great network to join if you're interested in a lot of different types of porn, but aren't looking for a specific niche. However, it can be a bit disappointing if you really like one particular theme and realize there's only one DVD's worth of content for it. Also since they're probably trying to appeal to as wide an audience as possible a lot of the scenes seem to follow the trends in porn with plenty of focus on step siblings and hotwifing. A few older scenes (I suspect right around when 50 Shades of Grey came out) are focused on BDSM or tied up models. Since there is so much content and it's all pretty varied it's hard to make any general statements. For the most part all content is really well shot, the models are good looking and the action is varied, but it does depend from DVD to DVD. Some videos focus more on the setup, while some jump right into the sex, some are more POV focused, while others have soft light and wide shots. I don't regret joining and I grabbed around 200 scenes that I'm very happy with, but I also don't know if I'll be joining again until they update a lot more content that I'm interested in. It certainly didn't feel like a site that I had to stay subscribed to for a long amount of time. The lack of photos and some navigation quirks also didn't help it's case, but on the other hand I think the scenes with Ella Nova are some of the best she's shot. If you've never joined the network before, like the models they have or really like porn parodies I'd say the score is easily 6 points higher, but for me personally it was a bit of an average network. 01-06-19  05:52pm Replies (1) Review 104 Nubiles Unscripted (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - 16 videos, but the site give you access to the entire NubilesPorn network which has over 1000 scenes. - Website design is clear and easy to use, the downloads come in multiple sizes and let you know ahead of time how large the file will be (from 1920x1080 ~3-4gb to 480x270 ~under 100mb). - Very attractive models, this site in particular has several videos with Anya Olsen, Tiffany Watson, Haley Reed and Gina Valentina, often without make up, looking gorgeous in a more natural state. - Several videos have multiple sex scenes and there is a lot of variety in both action and where the sex takes place (There's car sex, a blowjob on an inflatable raft and lots of outdoors sex.) Cons: - The site seems to be on hold for now. It's still listed as active, but no new updates since Mar 4, 2018. - Most videos are only around 25 minutes with a few minutes of intro, so while there is a lot of sex overall it does feel a bit like a small amount of content. - Photos are not always available and when they are there doesn't seem to be a zipped archive option. They do have screens of the videos that are pretty good quality, but again no zipped archive. - While they have "seasons" which follow a theme each video is pretty unique, there's no repeating style in each scene (which I find great and refreshing, but if you're looking for more structured porn this is not really it) - As with most Nubiles stuff don't expect the sex to be too rough or lean towards the hardcore side of things, there's also not a lot of toys and no anal scenes, but the varied location makes up for this. Bottom Line: I love behind the scenes videos, interviews with the girls and just generally natural feeling sex. In my opinion it's always awesome when you can get a sense for a girl's personality and can tell she is into the whole scene. As such this site really intrigued me and I joined the Nubiles network for it and the Nubiles-Castings site (although the whole network is pretty awesome, with a lot of great scenes of very attractive models). The site has "Seasons" which you can almost think of as a DVD - About 4-7 scenes themed around a core idea: Rally Race - they have a branded car they use to do some interviews with random people and shoot car sex scenes (Anya Olsen is the main actress here and she is great as a host, full of energy and very fun even if the interview is a bit awkward) then they drive several models to a cabin in the woods and shoot there. Snow Bunnies - Several models on a sky trip. Lake Powell - Several models on a boat in Lake Powell. What makes the whole site awesome, beyond the hot models, is that they show the girls arriving at the airport, driving to the cabin (flashing people as they're on the road), playing around and just generally being goofy. There's a lot of behind the scenes content cut into the intros to the videos showing everyone having a good time. It's absolutely awesome and makes the scenes feel like you would imagine a spring break college trip could be. The girls have good chemistry and it genuinely feels like some sex scenes are not planned, it's just a bunch of models and guys with cameras setting out to film porn, seeing what happens and filming it. Sadly most of this "theme setting" content is only used in the intros to the videos, in well edited montages. For example, the Snow Bunnies episode 1 has some great shots of the girls in the car to the winter cabin, getting out and showing their bottoms, and even a car blowjob before the scene cuts to a really good shower sex scene. The content is great, but they don't keep any of the banter in the car, or show the reaction of the other girls while one of them is giving a blowjob right next to them. I know that it must be really hard to cut together all that content in an interesting way, but to me the appeal of the site is the vibe of "yeah we're porn stars, but we're also just a bunch of girls on vacation having fun". It would have been really cool to keep the videos a bit longer (most of them are around 25-30 minutes) and show the girls chat, flirt with each other, maybe a brief interview or even the planning of what kind of content they want to shoot. Something to showcase the girl's personalities more. They even toyed with the idea of having some models record stuff on their phone, but it's very brief and easy to miss. I would have loved the girls maybe giving a bit of an interview on who they plan on sleeping with (nothing to crazy, but more than just a "Later That Night" card and then a cut to sex. Overall the way they use the BTS content feels like a missed opportunity. At times it's almost like "here's the fun montage up front in a 2 minute intro" now let's cut to the sex. All of that said, this is still some of the most unique content I've seen in a while, as I said before the models are awesome and they have good chemistry while the action is varied and fun. I just wish there were more seasons, and the videos were longer but if you're a fan of unscripted sex scenes this is a must buy. Probably as close you can get to amateur sex, while still filmed very well and edit into a great final product. 11-18-18  04:30pm Replies (0) Review 105 Nubiles.net (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Almost 1000 models at the point when I write this (994) Each one with several sets of images and photos, a lot of them in very good quality - Messmer mentioned the technical aspects of the videos and images in his review bellow mine. I'd like to add that while the older stuff is not as high quality all scenes on the site are still highly enjoyable and the images are great quality for almost all models. - A lot of very very good looking models. This is consistently one of the hottest sites out there with a ton of new models. Great great stuff. - Content is very hot with several scenes for each models, multiple outfits, different vibrators, dildos and enough boy girl sex to satisfy most people. (I believe the policy is out of three models they update one has to be hardcore ) - A new, more streamlined design that makes it much easier to browse through the scenes. A improved video browsing page and a strong search feature. Different Zipped archives and wallpaper bonuses Cons: - The thumbnails on the video page don't show a few frames from the scene when you hover over them. A real shame in my opinion. - While the models they add nowadays generally at least play with toys a lot of older content is very softcore. This is entirely personal, but don't expect to join this site ans see anal, threesomes, lesbian sex or any crazy orgies (they even have a set with Aspen and she doesn't do anal... that must be a first) - Ads to live shows on the main page. - As far as I understand they sub-contact the picture taking to various photographers so there is some discrepancy in between how each scene is lit/ shot/ etc. For the most part they offer hot stuff, but especially among the older content there can be a few bad apples. - Another personal issue is that while they seem to try and make a lot of the girls look innocent and school-girl like they still don't have very many stocking/ high heels, boots combos. I'd love to see some more erotic looking sets. Bottom Line: If you read my cons above you'll probably be able to tell that they refer mostly to older content or personal preference about the way a scene is shot or what they have the models wear. The reason for this is that there is very little you can complain about when it comes to Nubiles.com. The site promises hot young girls and it delivers. I can't think of any other site that has as many new faces, and many of them doing hardcore action too (hardcore here is just plain old boy girl, don't think Deepthroat, DP, anal or any of that crazy stuff) They update every day and have a new model every week or so. They offer a good mix or American and European models each girl has several sets of both images and video. I really love that some of the more popular models have up to 20 or so sets. It's great to see more and more stuff from a popular model and I hope they keep bringing back the girls the community enjoys the most. Since I mentioned the community I have to say that they have a pretty decent forum with some strong activity and a few nice bonuses like sneak previews of the up-coming updates. Also the webmasters are very responsive in case you encounter some error or you find links that are out of date, etc. Recently the site has also gotten a face-lift that makes it look sleeker, works better on mobile devices (or at least it does on my tablet) and allows for easier browsing of the videos. While this is a great move I hope they add some way to quickly tell what each video contains. Right now we only get one thumbnail from the scene, the running time, the model name and a video name that goes something like this: 3v_daybedrub or 4v_tubesocks... not very descriptive. I also hope they improve their search function. While the form they have now works well enough and allows for some pretty customized searches (they have 3 short girls with braces and puffy nipples for example :) I would like to be able to see categories on each scene or video, categories that could leas me to other similar scenes from other models. Right now it can be a bit daunting sifting through all the content they have. In fact this is probably one of my biggest issues with the webdesign right now. While the models page is excellent and now there is a quick and easy easy to see all videos available they don't really have a method of seeing similar scenes from other models. They don't link between the girls and overall the navigation isn't the most entertaining or immersing. Since we're talking cons I also have to mention the bonus section which is a joke and the fact that there are ads in the members page which sadly seems to become all too common nowadays. Also there are small errors here and there (a broken link, a Russian model who does mostly anal shots says she never does anal in the bio, small stuff here and there) I would also love an option to exclude older content since they have quite a few models they only do nude shots and a few photographers that are not the best (you can comment on the photographers skill and I believe they are actively filtering the bad ones out). I also wish they had more behind the scenes content. There are several interviews that are very cute and interesting, but it can be a bit hard to find them quickly. Also for a site that prides itself on the connection between the models and the community (you can contact each model individually, although I doubt many answer) they could add a lot more behind the scenes bonuses, especially since they have a lot of US models. Anyhow, I feel like I am just listing my personal dislikes and getting into really nit picky stuff here. The bottom line is that the site is very good. It could improve in some areas and they are working on it, listening to comments from the community and changing stuff for the better. Nothing but praise for the webmasters and I hope to see many quality updates in the future. 11-07-11  06:41pm Replies (4) Review 106 Nubiles.net (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 10-05-09  08:33am  (Update History) Reason: Joined the site again, and looked at the updates. Big improvement Pros: FIRST OF ALL this is a very subjective review so keep that in mind as I list my pros and cons for this site. -nice young looking teenagers (barely legal but all are 18 as far as I could tell) I think the quality of the girls (cute faces, petite) increased significantly. -nice navigation+ easy downloading -large amount of content -a lot of info about the models helping you know them -members board - a lot of options for leaving feedback. The webmasters really care about your opinion. - much more hardcore than before (my main con argument is slowly proving to be a mute point) Cons: - there are teens who do hardcore and teens who do softcore and rarely do the two mix. Which means that instead of watching a girl go from solo shots to anal or, something hard like that, you get some newcomers who only do the hard and the cute teens who only do solo and toy scenes. This makes the site actually feel like two different sites, one with good looking solo cute teens and one with random hardcore girls. Out of the top ten rated girls only four have sex, but wait the four are actually two girls placed in the top rated twice. Which brings me to the website owners attitude. I feel like they are trying to cheat us their approach is just to bring in more hardcore girls instead of getting the cutter teens to do the hardcore and the softcore... This attitude makes me wish they had made two sites but instead they chose to make one single site that brags it has teens doing both softcore and hardcore. Bottom Line: EDIT: I re-joined this site recently and felt I simply HAD to re-view my review. I tried to leave as much of the original review there (the opinion below is from before joining the site again) but damn this site improved a lot since I last visited it. The girls were hot back then, they are awesome now and so many of them do hardcore as well as softcore. Thank you! That was exactly what I wanted from this site a progression of teens going through all the stages from stripping to hardcore. Thank you! This site is a must on my list now. Keep up the good work guys. I am a fan of hardcore teen porn and I felt cheated by the Nublies team and I disliked their approach to the website as well as the direction they were taking the project. I expected the girls they highlight to go all the way in a nice progression. If you can look past the difference in hardcore and softcore models the website has a nice, big collection of photos and videos. But if you like hardcore I'd recommend other teen sites before this one, to be honest. 08-01-09  02:07pm Replies (11) Review 107 Office Obsession (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Despite what the official best porn review says the site only lists 80 scenes today with the latest being uploaded on December 11, 2017. - The scenes have categories and you can search based on those pretty easily, although I wish there were a few more descriptive ones. - Incredibly hot models and a nice mix of European and American girls (tags are not always right but the site lists about 30 European models. The American tag only lists 11 models but there are a lot more American girls here). - Really hot outfits, lots of stockings and high heels and for the most part the outfits stay at least partially on. - Lots of positions (especially since most sex takes place on tables and couches, it's impressive how creative they get) - Great light and editing, lots of nice close-ups mixed with good wide angles. The editing is also for the most part really good with nice music over the intro and smooth cuts whenever needed. Cons: - No updates since 2017 and the site doesn't show in all of their main search functions, pretty safe to say it's dead and no new updates are coming. - Most scenes are boy-girl. They do have a few threesomes and at least one lesbian scene, but don't expect a lot of variance in that area. - While the theme is supposed to be office sex, there are a handful of nurses/ doctor scenes and some other scenes that don't fit the theme ( a maid, a Christmas scene, that kind of stuff), not a big deal breaker, but just don't expect all 80 scenes to be set in an office. - As I noted in my Elegant Anal review some scenes from this network can be a bit short. Almost all scenes here are at or over 30 minutes, but with some having a relatively long set up of 7-8 minutes that can be a bit of a downside. Also no interviews or behind the scenes or any extra content. - Some models have a thick accent which makes some of the set-up a bit awkward to listen to if that bothers you. Bottom Line: I originally joined the babes network for elegant anal and while a lot of the stuff I said in that review applies here as well this site blew me away. Let's start with the good: all scenes are very well filmed with good cuts, nice mix of wide shots and closeups. The models are really gorgeous and while they still are mostly Caucasian and teen looking there is more variation here than over at elegant anal. The website design is modern and responsive, I've had no issues with it on my phone or pc, even with some spotty hotel internet. I wish they had less ads, but overall can't complain. I couldn't really check download speeds since I only had a streaming subscription, but the photo galleries have a nice slideshow function and videos played in high resolution (1080p is the max, no 4k here) with minimum buffering. Overall very happy with the technical side of things. (Categories could be a bit better, but the site is small enough that I could find the videos I liked pretty easily) Unlike elegant anal where I wish there was more attention paid to the setup for the scenes most videos here have a longer intro and the girls keep on their cute outfits. Zazie Skymm leaning backward over a desk and giving a blowjob while still wearing her heels and a half opened yellow shirt is an incredible sight. The way Jade Nile is playful and smirks at the male model when he's trying to ignore her because he's in a conference call is simply adorable. There are so many incredible models here (Dillion Harper, Ella Hughes, Angel Smalls) and there are so many tight skirts, heels and stockings the site really stands out. The biggest negative if of course that it's a dead site. No longer getting updates is a pretty big downside and I haven't been so sad to see a site go in a while. That said the 80 scenes on here are great and while a few of them could be a little less blurry (the Angel Smalls and Janice Griffith scenes in particular seemed very fuzzy for some reason) or would benefit from a few more wide shots, overall the content is top notch. In conclusion if you like the office setting fantasy or just like to see girls partially clothed in stuff they might wear around an office, and are interested in the models I mentioned above, this site alone makes the babes network worth it. Throw in the other sites they have (elegant anal, babes, step mom lessons) and this is worth checking out at least once. I am only giving it a 75 instead of a higher score because there isn't more of the great content they can produce. 12-05-18  08:41pm Replies (0) Review 108 Only Tease (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A lot of content. You get around 3 updates every day and the archives go back all the way to 2002. According to their specs they have over 1 million images... pretty crazy. They started adding high quality images at the end of 2007 and now all sets are available as 1,066px × 711, 2,048px × 1,365 or 3,000px × 2,000px - They also offer videos (although they are around 5 minutes each and I wouldn't call them the highlight of the site) - Tons and tons of models and an incredible amount of outfits (anything from Halloween costumes to secretary, nurse and night gowns) Tons of stockings and any type of underwear or stocking that you can think off. - A pretty active forum with many members and wembasters posting all sorts of behind the scenes info. - Pretty decent search function that lets you find several per-selected categories quickly (want to find all girls with petite breasts, or all girls in a Dorothy costume?) - If you get onlyallsites you have a network with a few similar sites. Cons: - This is a very softcore site. If I had to compare it with anything mainstream I'd say it's Maxim with a bit more boob. - Videos are rather awkward (they don't have any sound and many of the girls look very nervous as they stare at the camera. In one video I watched you can hear some crows in the background, another one some car sounds... the whole thing just felt amateurish and awkward ) - Some photo sets are mislabeled and the girls don't even get nude/ show their breasts. - They have pretty big ads on the main page and there seems to be no way to get rid of them. Also they have a bunch of "interactive" ads to their live camera shows which can get frustrating. - They have a few shots with two girls, but they never really touch each other or kiss. It just feels like a bit of a waste. - More model related search options would be nice. I'd like to see all models in a certain age range or of a certain ethnicity/ hair color etc. - Some inconsistencies in how sets are saved Bottom Line: First of all don't join this site expecting hardcore action. In fact don't even expect to see every model fully nude. This site is one of the most softcore ones I have ever joined (including playboy and met-art). Another huge downside is that the videos are not up to modern standards. They are all very short (under 10 minutes)often not very high quality and I found them to be rather awkward. Let me explain what I mean about awkward videos. Most of the scenes I watched featured the model introducing herself then trying to dance to nonexistent music. You can hear noises from the outside (as well as camera noises) and most of the girls seem confused as to what they should do. They rub themselves, but don't really play with their breasts or vagina. They try to dance and pull their hair up, but somehow it just feels like they were given no direction past "look sexy" The scenes are not helped by the fact that the camera usually just sits in one position, instead of doing some panning or close ups. This site is all about stockings and costumes, so why the heck not zoom onto the girls feet or pan on their buts. Also I understand that the site is softcore, but I think it would be just fine to show the girls slowly let their hands go towards their vagina, you know, imply that they are sexual and willing to pleasure themselves... just saying. Some of the better videos featured the girls changing outfits or answering fan questions. Both of these types of scenes are much, much better. If the girl is actually doing something (like putting on new stockings or laughing over "sexy" questions) the video actually becomes interesting. Otherwise I feel it's just an exercise in awkward silence. I wish that instead of the silent stripping scenes we have now they would give us some behind the scenes videos of the photo-shoots. I think that would end up being much sexier than seeing a girl twirl to the sound of a camera recording. Anyhow this site is not about the videos, it's all about gorgeous photos and they truly deliver when it comes to images. The site offers some pretty impressive high resolution images along with tons and tons of good looking models in many varied outfits. You can find any type of stocking, underwear and skirt combo you can think of. They even have a pretty large selection of Halloween themed costumes. Uniforms, secretary, cheerleaders, tennis, ballet, gym outfits, all kinds of socks... you get the idea. Unfortunately they don't have a lot of variation in the locations they shoot and almost all sets are extremely brightly lit. I would have liked some more outdoors scenes as well as more mood light (a fireplace or a bathtub with candles or what not) After browsing the site for a few hours I could recognize the setting for the secretary scene and there seems to be a snow white outfit that at least 7 models use, also don't even get me started on the red riding hood or the hooters girls. More cosplay outfits, more corsets and shoes, more locations for the scenes and more focus on mood would help. Now don't get me wrong, I am listing all my cons here, but in the end I saved thousands of images from this network. The models they have are exclusive and extremely hot. Also they usually have more than five sets with each model so if you really like a girl you can see her in multiple outfits and often with multiple hair styles as well. Another nice thing is that they focus a lot on the girls faces and some of the models are incredibly cute. I do wish they had a better model index though. Right now the model page has one image for each models and the photo is not always very clear. Also it's almost always a full body shot, which makes it hard to see the girls face. So the bottom line is that the site is great if you want softcore glamor shots of girls. As a bonus you get some videos and access to a pretty active community that discusses the girls, talks about upcoming features and, as far as I can tell webmasters who actually listen to the users. There are some downsides and they need to do some more work, add more navigation options (maybe a quick way to sort the top rated models, or an improved thumbnail system). Better directed and edited videos and a few less ads in the member section would also be nice. Nonetheless overall this is a great glamor site. If the girls played with toys or with themselves more this would be an incredible place. Right now I'd say it's great for anyone very interested in different outfits and stockings and okay for the great majority. A solid 80 for their target market, a 60 or so if you want more nudity and hardcore action. 10-30-11  07:16pm Replies (0) Review 109 Over 18 Under 21 (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 20 scenes, videos and photos (Videos at 640x 480 WMV and images around 768px × 1,024px, although no zip option for images.) - Great download speeds although not enough download options regarding video quality - Rough hardcore (the girls seem to be really into it and there is some pretty rough deepthroating and some choking. Not very much anal play though) - Some cute models (Hillary Scott) - The girls all wear cute clothing and in some scenes they keep some of their stuff on, so there is some nice variation. - Full network access with some of the models appearing on other network sites as well. Cons: - The site is tiny (only about 20 scenes and while the sex is pretty hot several of the models are pretty well known so not a lot of new stuff here) - Doesn't seem to get any new updates. - Video quality could be much better, also I'd appreciate better lighting (sometimes when they go for a close-up the image gets too dark because of the angle) - Most of the scenes seem kinda generic, the girls don't look into the camera a lot and some of them seem to just go through the action kinda mechanically. (One girl in particular just kept screaming I've been bad daddy, give it to me daddy, to the point where it got very distracting.) Too much focus on the whole daddy's girl aspect - The lack of zipped archives and some rather poor photo scenes make it clear the focus here is videos, but we don't have HD or particularly unique videos so... well let's just way that this is overall one of the weakest sites of the network Bottom Line: First of all beware of the trial for this network since it doesn't really work well (you only get some scenes and it changes into a full membership rather abruptly). Secondly, don't expect that this network will change your life, they have some good content but overall they are pretty average, especially if you're looking for young adult stuff. I'd say the stocking/ leg niche and the Asian angle is what they focus on although backstabingsluts is also very nice. Either way, young adult is not their cup of tea and it's very obvious. This is the only site dedicated to young adults and it's not very large or very unique by a long stretch Now don't get me wrong, the scenes are pretty intense and I believe exclusive, however they are virtually the same to what you could find on the majority of hardcore DVD's. For the sake of compassion I watched some of the scenes here next to scenes I had from videobox and to be honest I couldn't tell which was which (well, that's a lie, the videobox movies were in better resolution so there's that) Each scene seems to start with the girl dancing around a bit to standard porn music. After a few minutes a guy walks in and we get some pretty rough sex, including some spankings, deepthroating and a bit of playful choking. There is the standard porn dialogue: "You're a bad girl, I'll have to send you to your room" and the standard blow job, sex, cum-shot routine (Interesting enough most sites in the network don't follow this routine, with a lot more 69, toys or other types of interesting/ different sex) Nothing on here comes close to the intensity of something like Facial abuse, but we're not talking about softcore porn either. Basically the scenes are similar to what you'd find on the Barely 18 series of DVD's or Cum stained casting couch or most Hustler videos. Good old fashioned porn with girls that could be anywhere from 20 to 30 and pretend they are much younger. Big lollipops are present, along with ridiculously short skirts and make-up smears. However, at the end of the day you can get more young adult content for your money on other sites, shorter miniskirts and more intense hardcore action along with younger looking models. Try Teencoreclub, Firstanalquest, 21sextury, Nubiles, or good old Videobox. Any of those sites have better camerawork and more girls, along with much easier navigation (I didn't mention it so far but this site is basically one page where all the scenes, video or photo are mixed together, no search options, no categories, no model index, no multiple download options, overall just the bare bones of a site.) However, if the rest of the network attracts you then this could be a nice, if not very big bonus site. Their Asian content and the stocking sites are much more interesting so check those out and look at this site as a bonus not a main attraction. P.S. I uploaded a review for one of the stocking sites as well so you can get an idea as to what kind of content they have there. 09-18-11  01:53pm Replies (0) Review 110 Playboy Plus (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Right now the site offers a deal where you can get 3 weeks for free, (in order to cancel you have to call them, but it was all pretty easy) - A ton of playboy extras including montages from the photo-shots, extra pictures and access to old pictorials (Betty Paige, Marlyn and so on) - The images are anywhere between 531px × 800px to 1600 x 1200 px. In other words you get decent quality. - The videos are anywhere from blurry cut into pieces 2 minute segments to beautiful HD more recent shots. Most of the scene can be seen as quick time or WMV and are anywhere between 320p to 720p resolution and then quicktime HD, which I didn't figure out how to download. - You get access to videos from casting calls, amateurs, coeds, classic pictorials, playmates, some 2 girl shots, a decent forum, interviews, a how-they made the covers and a few extra bells and whistles. - The girls look really good, which is to be expected and if you like the magazine you're almost guaranteed to like this Cons: - Inconsistency. The whole site is extremely confusing at times. Each girl (even in the same category) has different types of content, most of the older ones only have photos, others have a short interview, others have just a video. Some you can download, many you can't. Sometimes when you click on a gallery you're taken to a little editorial before you get to the good stuff, other times you don't. - The search function is a bit funky and navigation can get confusing. - A lot of the content cannot be downloaded. - Not as many interviews with the girls as I expected, most of the videos are of the girls posing for the photos, only some playmates get an interview. - Often the site re-directs you to buy a DVD or an older magazine, a bit disappointing as I expected full access to the contents. - Most videos feel like something you'd see on TV, not like a porn video. You get music and cut-aways which are not always necessary Bottom Line: First of all this is a Playboy product, don't expect any type of hardcore (or even softcore touching or masturbation) going into this site. Hell even in the fre photos they have with two two girls the models barely touch, it's all very artsy and classy. This comes with a bonus and a downside. On one hand most of the girls are absolutely gorgeous much better looking that most sites, on the other hand they all seem to have that Playboy look (no small titties, almost always shaved and very skinny, etc.) What was also interesting was that many of the videos felt like a reality show, more than a porn video...I am still not sure if I like this or not. For now I left it under cons because when you have a 3-5 minute video, which a lot of these are, I'd rather see more naked girl and less pan around the room or have a nice intro and outro. Most of the older content is a bit outdated with lower resolutions for both videos and images and no option to download. However the streaming option worked flawlessly and the inbuilt image navigator is perfect, it allows you to set a slide or navigate manually and you can save the photos. For new content you get a lot more bonus with the most recent playmates having a longer (20 min or so) video which contains an interview as well as a sort of story- strip video... I remember for one girl she follows a rabbit around until she ends up naked then we cut to some interview with her, then back to the nakedness, then some more questions and so on. For the rest of the girls you usually just get her stripping naked to music, a few giggles some funny faces and it's a wrap. At the end of it all the site feels like the extras on a DVD, more than the main feature. I mean, don't get me wrong I saved a ton of stuff (since each video is so small they are easy to store and so many of the amateurs and co-eds are adorable) but I don't think I was "really" turned on by any particular video. Here's how I feel about the site by way of analogy: most of the scenes I felt very comfortable reviewing in the middle of my living-room with friends and wife nearby, if you get my drift...it's like the playboy magazine, I'm not embarrassed of having it on my desk and I'll check out the girls, but I probably won't jack-off to it. That being said, as a fan of behind the scenes, seeing some of the girls I saw long ago in the magazine actually talking and moving around was very interesting. I appreciate the very high quality of the images and the videos and while they feel to TV for my taste I wish more porn sites would use well chosen songs and work with the models at least half as well as Playboy does. So, the conclusion? If you are subscribed to the magazine (which is about the same cost like the site) you will probably enjoy the extra content of the site, if the magazine seems like waste of time and money the site will probably do little to change your opinion. 10-16-10  11:47am Replies (0) Review 111 Porn Pros Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Tons and tons of videos, (they seem to have more than 6000 scenes and are uploading 2 per day) - Videos are available in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Even nicer they offer a trailer for each scene, so you get a quick impression of what will go down. - Streaming was excellent, downloads are incredibly fast, navigation is easy and the main network site allows quick access to all member sites. Overall the technical aspects of the site look okay. - Fixed their billing/ spam issues (see bottom line for more details, but a great improvement) - A lot of different sites that fit many niches including BDSM, cum-shots, MILF, African American, Latino, old on young etc. Focus on young looking girls and hardcore sex (not a ton of anal, DP or deepthroat) - Some very hot models that seem exclusive (and new to the industry) Cons: - Some of the sites in the network don't update very often or at all, the main focus right now seem to be the disgraced and violation sites (which are light BSDM/ a random guy supposedly running up to girls and cumming on them or pulling their clothes off in public) The real ex-girlfriend/ amateur sites and the 18/ Jurassic cock sites. - Some of the navigation features could still be improved. The models index is a bit wonky especially with girls that appeared in older videos (some links don't work, lead to wrong videos etc.) Nothing big, but still would be nice to see everything work. - The fake cum shots/ public violation can be either a pro or a con. If you hate over the top videos this network probably has a few sites that might put you off. Overall they have a very specific vibe to the site and some people will love it others will hate it. - They still have some adds in the member section (Adblocker on Mozilla should take care of everything) Bottom Line: This is one of the first networks that I joined years ago and I have to say they have been improving constantly. I remember about a year back when they used to spam your e-mail and I had serious trouble canceling my billing with them. They finally seem to have cleaned up their act and are now focusing on creating some awesome porn. I had no trouble canceling and no spam from them. They also created a new members page which looks better than before and seems to have fewer bad links. This doesn't mean it's perfect, but it's a good step in the right direction. Better previews of the scenes would help (right now they have only one image a few categories and a verbal description, unless you click on the scene), as would a way to find all anal scenes from one model for example. Right now they don't have any way to do this kind of cross tab search. Nonetheless, they offer category search, model search, site specific search... overall unless you want a very specific video you shouldn't have trouble finding good content. Another improvement would be if they offered more hardcore scenes. Don't get me wrong the disgraced series is pretty fun and intense (want to see a girl get tied up and fucked in a swing or while clothespins are stretching her pussy out? This site has it) However the site has almost no anal scenes (a lot that are labeled anal are actually light ass play) and almost no true deepthroats (although the deepthroatlove site is changing that don't expect to see too many girls with smeared make-up or spit/ semen on their faces) Right now the site focuses on having good looking young girls (even the MILF, look young) doing regular sex scenes. And I believe they have some of the best straight sex scenes out there. A ton of new girls, along with several better known models, but all of them with awesome bodies, great make-up, good lighting, good camera work and some pretty well hung male models. Almost all scenes start with a bit of an interview so you get a feel for the girl, then we get to the action which can be pretty varied (they have several threesomes, POV, the light bondage series as well as more traditional little scenes). Sometimes they use fake cocks and fake cum, which seems to disagree with many people, but I'd say that maybe only one site that is still updating does that (cum-shot surprise). So it's pretty easy to ignore those scenes, especially when you get over 6000 other videos to choose from. In the sections above I mentioned that the site has a specific vibe to it. I'd like to talk a bit about this. The Porn Pros network always had a strong fun, classic porn identity. They don't do the whole innocent Lolita or the abuse the female model spiel. With this network you get good old fashioned porn. Hot girls that look like they are having fun and a lot of regular sex in over the top situations. This is not Facialabuse or Met-art, this is the kind of almost mainstream porn that used to be all over the DVD market, except Porn Pros makes it look even better and offers a ton of variations so you won't get bored. The Disgraced series isn't really that disgraceful or abusive, but for someone that doesn't care for intense, humiliating BDSM they are just the right amount of deviant to be fun. The amateur sites they offer follow the same model. Sure we get a bunch of shots of the girl in the mirror and POV shots, but the quality is still miles above anything a true amateur could produce and just different enough to keep me entertained. That feels like the key to this network, they aim to entertain. Even the fake cum falls into that model, sure it's fake, but it's entertaining to stuff squirting on them. It's all meant to be light hearted fun and form some people that works (I love their vibe, their fun scenes and the hot models). Bottom line: Don't expect this network to fit into a narrow niche. If you want only intense BDSM or truly amateur scenes or would rather see all anal sex, then I believe there are many other better sites for you. However for 18 bucks, considering the amount of content you get and the high quality of the models it's a shame not to give this network a try. 10-05-11  08:00pm Replies (3) Review 112 Porn Pros Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -a lot of content -nice, fun scenes. The girls look like they're having fun and the guys make fun and small talk. Overall a feel good porn site -many girls seem amateur-ish and almost all of them look good (maybe it's the professional camerawork) -some models I couldn't find anywhere else Cons: -some videos are disappointing compared to the overall quality especially in the real ex-girlfriend section -the fake monster cock is kinda cheesy and it gets old pretty fast -the site can be very slow and images tend to not load sometimes, also the download is awfully slow -older content is not as good in visual quality and models good looks Bottom Line: Overall this is a good deal, especially if you like funny porn. I often chuckle when I watch some of their scenes: "It's so HUGE!" :big eyes: Also they have a good selection of young girls in funny/interesting roles (I just graduated, fuck me! I'm lost can you fuck me?) Worth giving a try 08-01-09  02:31pm Replies (0) Review 113 Public Invasion (0) 80.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - around 200 scenes and 196 theoretically amateur European girls. Videos are good quality (can't remember if it was 720 or 640..something around there) and the photos are really nice at 2912px × 4368px (saved a few) But there are no zipped archives and the videos come in 3 small Wmv clips that have to be glued together (or a bunch of smaller mpeg clips). So not the download friendliest website out there. - you get access to at least 4 other websites including welickeachother and bustyadventures. - each scene has a trailer, which really helps get a feel for the video before downloading it. - good quality and most models look very cute and very amateur-ish. Many hot scenes and there is some variation including anal and outdoors sex. Also the pick-up of the girls is rather funny/ cool. Sort of like an interview but it seems less scripted. The English doesn't help though most models and the cameraman having poor grammar... Cons: - last update was June although they promise to update every Wednesday. - the lack of download options got to me eventually, as well as the sometimes slow download speed and crashes during downloads. - not all girls do hardcore (not a huge drawback but it's still frustrating at times) - not all photo sets show hardcore action. - the English (or lack of it) can get frustrating. - some models are better looking than others. There is a nifty model search that helps select good looking ones, though. - no way of selecting what kind of scene you want to watch (anal, outdoors, etc.) Bottom Line: Let me start by saying that this site is clearly for fans of European women, they all have a very distinct look about them, which turns some men on and can turn others off. Make sure that you really like European women before joining this site, the models here dress European and they talk and walk like Europeans. Also don't expect too much variety, almost each video starts with the guy approaching a girl, asking her to flash him, they then have sex (anal or vaginal) usually outdoors but in a more secluded spot and then they leave on their own ways. There is a lot of fucking with clothes on (I'm a sucker for that). A lot of thigh high pantyhose and a lot of action from one or two positions as they don't have a bed or couch to "act" on. Is this good or bad? It really depends on the user. I found it hot as hell but other people might find the action boring and repetitive. Either way be warned that the site is not the most user friends as it doesn't offer a full clip of the action (main reason I left, that and the lack of updates) Instead they have two options of clips 3 WMV's or a bout 10 MPEGS. On the positive side their streaming works well and between the screenshots and the trailer you can really get a good idea of what you're about too watch. Also most trailers and screenshots are really arousing...so that's a bonus :) All and all I'd recommend this site as it's very different from the usual porn. The girls have a certain unique look and the fact that they keep their silly little fur jackets on while getting fucked makes the whole scene much more arousing. However the user friendliness and the bad English are some speed bumps on how fast you should sign-up... 09-08-09  06:09pm Replies (0) Review 114 Real Ex Girlfriends (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Around 265 scenes available as mpg mp4 and wmv The more recent stuff it at around 1280x720, while older scenes are sadly at around 600x400 . - Frequent updates, this seems to be one of the most updated sites in the Porn Pros network right now with at least one update per week and 6 updates during the month of May. - Photos available for each scene in zip files (around 1500x800 for the more recent scenes and around 200 images per set, the older stuff is around 800x600 and more like 170 per set) - Very fast downloads (regularly maxed my internet connection while using Downloadthemall for firefox) - Access to the entire porn pros network which has a lot of similar content (several of the girls have scenes on other sites like disgraced18) - Almost all the models are incredibly hot porn stars, big boobs, cute faces, lots of make-up and sexy lingerie. - A lot of the scenes are focused on long POV blow jobs with some great close-ups. Not many wide angles. Cons: Porn pros has been around for a while and is a major network with a lot of positive stuff and cons which are mostly subjective stuff. For example none of the girls here are actually amateurs or unknown girls (almost all have at least another video on the network) For some people that's a deal breaker, for me it doesn't really matter that much. Anyhow, the following cons are some minor stuff that could be improved in my opinion - Some older videos are not lit very well and a sever of the older POV scenes are filmed with a shaky hand-held. - Streaming while fine most of the time can be a bit slow if you're downloading a video already. - Navigation is a bit clumsy at time, although all the major tag searches, model pages and the basics are there, somehow the site is not 100% user friendly, it just takes a bit of getting used to. - The photos could be a bit better several images were blurry or showing the girl from a very unflattering angle (half closed eyes etc.) Bottom Line: Porn pros is a huge network with tons and tons of content. Even though several of their sites don't update anymore they still have enough videos here to keep you busy for quite a while. Real ex-girlfriends, Disgraced 18, Cumshot surprise and 18 year olds are some of the site that still update frequently and the content here is still high quality classic porn. I say classic porn because the girls look a lot like old fashioned porn stars, big boobs, make up, high heels and corsets, the whole nine yards. Also the action is not fetish stuff or rough, nasty sex with crazy DP, anal or insane deep throating, here you get just regular vagina, bj sex that reminds one of the early 2000 porn boom. Which is great if that's what you're looking for. The scenes are roughly divided into POV shots where the "girlfriend" has a surprise birthday party for the guy or just got out of the shower or she gets caught looking for a vibrator. Some quick 5 minute set-up followed by a quick strip show and a long POV blow job scene, sex and facial or creampie. These are mostly the older videos on the site and some are in lower resolution and a bit darker, but in most of these videos the BJ shots are really hot and well done. There is minimal talking, no interviews, no talking during the sex, and pretty long action (most older scenes are over 30 minutes but some go as long as 60 minutes) On the other hand a lot of the more recent scenes on the site are shot from a somewhat wider angle, no talking whatsoever, the girl and guy just walk in and have sex. These scenes tend to be a bit shorter, usually around 20 min, but are available in higher resolution, good light and a mix of wider angles and close-ups. Also there is no real set-up and very little stripping. The scenes usually start as the guy walks in and starts giving head to the girl, with some very good close ups of the action. Some of the best guy giving oral to a girl I've seen in a while, mostly because they often manage to get her face as well as the action in the same shot. Of course there are some scenes that don't really fall in either category, but the point here is that there is a lot of variation and with several settings (kitchen, several hotel rooms, even one or two outdoor scenes) you won't get bored quickly. They even have a scene( Tiffany Brookes I believe) where she is getting fucked on a glass balcony of sorts and several minutes of the action are shot from underneath, really interesting and different stuff. Overall the content doesn't get stale and between the great looking girls, the different angles and settings the site is a great deal. One of the biggest downsides for me was that the navigation is functional, but a bit clumsy. For example you can't really see the most popular scenes on just one site, it will show you the most popular scenes on the entire network. There are tags and categories, but again they work for the entire network so I can't really see all scenes tagged "big tits" on real ex girlfriends, I get too see the scenes tagged like that on the entire network. Then again all the girls here have big tits so no big loss :) Another somewhat strange trend is that fact that some scenes are labeled MILF when the girls clearly look young, or amateur when the girls are clearly no amateurs. Speaking of which, there is at least one scene where they show a 1 minute interview with the girl where she is asked if her agent informed her why she's there today "to have sex, duh!" she answers, then they try to pretend the whole video is an amateur scene shot by a jealous boyfriend because she cheated on him or something like that...a bit of mixed messages here. Anyhow, don't expect the girls from backroomcastingcouch or woodmancasting to show up here. But these are mostly subjective complaints and if you like porn stars, classic sex in some fun and different locations/ outfits (do you want to see a girl wear her ugg boots through the entire shoot?) This site will be a nice compilation of videos. Add in the massive network and I wholeheartedly recommend this to anyone that's never tried it before, but don't expect very niche material, this is all pretty much mainstream porn here. 06-03-12  12:22pm Replies (0) Review 115 Rookie Babe (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Roughly 100 models, 225 photo scenes and 100 videos. - Most of the images are at 8000x1200, but a handful are as high as 2048x3072 and some go higher (maybe 25 go as high as 5120x). - Most girls have a video interview, but it's usually only 5 minutes or less with some pretty standard questions that get repeated for each girl (where do you like to shop, what couldn't you live without etc), some girls also have a bonus video where they talk about themselves, put some make-up on or get dressed. There are one or two solo masturbation scenes, but they are less than 5 minutes as well and not terribly exciting. - Good light and good framing for the photos. Some great shots of good looking models. - You also get a written interview with the girl with some playboy like questions (describe your personality, what do you love about your body, etc) - Decent navigation, easy to download content, good model pages. Overall very decent webdesign, functional and pleasant to use. Cons: - Very basic site, the photos are the highlight of the site and with only around 40 images in each scene not much is going on here, think Playboy level of softcore. The girls get undressed and pose around a bit, but no close-ups and just one outfit per shoot. - Videos are here only as a way to help you get to know the girl, but with some very basic questions and only 4 minutes of footage per clip it's hard to get excited about the movies available here. - While some of the more recent updates are in 5120 resolution some are as low as 1200, when the biggest selling point of the site is the high resolution of the images this is not good. All updates should be high resolution. - Videos are in pretty bad resolutions 640x400 and not really well lit. - When trying to stream a video I sometimes got an error that the video wasn't found..not sure why. It was rather infrequent, but still Bottom Line: I joined the site because several of the girls looked incredibly hot and I expected something similar to the cyber playboy club or met art. I didn't go into the site expecting hardcore action or even seeing the girls masturbate, but even so I ended up being disappointed by the content here. A lot of the scenes have around 30 images and they are all shot in the same location and same outfit. Several of the galleries are just the girl standing in front of a white wall or a brick wall or on a couch in front of a white wall. In fact I noticed that they don't even like to move the girls around too much. If a scene is shot in a hotel on a bed, don't expect the girl to also maybe pose in a chair or standing up next to the bed, they will have her maybe stand on the bed, but that's it. I understand that you would need to set the lights again and move equipment around, but when your entire site is dedicated to images you have to offer a bit more. I also mentioned the outfits, the vast majority of girls are dressed in jeans and t-shirts or very plain skirts. There are maybe one or two scenes where the girl is wearing a corset or stockings and high heels. But for the most part there is nothing here that I couldn't see walking down the street. Now don't get me wrong I don't mind that the girls bring their own clothes to these shoots, but the reason I would pay for a site that has only softcore images and under 100 images per set would be because I get to see the girls in different outfits, in different poses and under different angles, in glamor shots as well as outdoor shots, here the diversity is minimal. The content just doesn't feel worth it. I could go to Met-art or X-art and get the same gorgeous looking models in a lot better looking images. (mind you not technically speaking, the photos here are great, well lit and professionally taken, but most of the time the photographer could have chosen better ways to present the girls.) The other attractive aspect of the site for me was the idea that you could get to know the girls, get to know their unique personality, at least that's what the FAQ of the site promised. I guess the videos are meant to help here, but the low resolution, short length makes it hard to enjoy the limited clips available. The interviews are very brief and don't really help. Compared to Littlemutt for example, you don't get any feel for the models here. The one area the site shines in is the diversity of the models, they have some gorgeous looking black and asian models. This is one area that I really enjoyed and is lacking from many other photo sites. In the end the site has some great models but just doesn't use them as well as they could. If we had more outfits, more locations, more video interviews and daily updates in high definition this would be a great site. As it stands now I would recommend Met-art, X-art even Nubiles over this site. P.S. It only gets a 70 because the site design is very well done and the models themselves are incredible looking. 05-28-12  04:39pm Replies (0) Review 116 Sasha Rose (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - 26 scenes with Russian model Sasha Rose doing all the basic and not so basic stuff (solo masturbation scenes, fisting, regular hardcore sex as well as anal and double anal penetration, lesbian action as well as lesbian fisting) - Videos are all good quality with multiple size options and formats to chose from HD- 1920x1080 SD- 640x480 and WMV or MP4. - Images are available as zipped and are decent quality at around 1200x800. There are around 170 images per set and overall they look decent/ aren't just thumbnails. - The site had great download speeds, no log-out periods, no issues navigating and overall it probably has the nicest interface of the whole network. - The Bonus feature is a joke, but you do get access to several network sites that still update pretty often. - There is a members forum where you can report issues and in theory could communicate with Sasha. (t would be awesome if it worked) Cons: - The last update on the site was 10.10.2010 and I don't think we'll see much stuff here in the near future. - The forum, while a potentially nice bonus is devoid of life and Sahsa only posted on it 6 times total. - The whole strength of a solo site is the girl offering new and unique content. While the scenes here are exclusive they are not incredibly unique (except for one or two). A membership with many other networks will get you similar stuff from Sasha. Some of the outfits here are nice (a hot pair of heels here and a nice corset there) but simply not enough different content to warrant joining this particular site. - The network sites are nice but several of them are old and don't update anymore (Dildo sex machine last updated in 2009, Brutal anal sex doesn't have dates but is old. Extream Kream updated this year but irregularly, anal dildo lesbians last updated in 2008) - They have adds in the member's area Bottom Line: I love Sasha Rose. I loved her since I first found her sets on Teencorenetwork. She does anal, fisting and even double anal and makes it look effortless and fun. She has a great body and gorgeous lips, overall she is one of my favorites so joining a site dedicated to her sounded like a great idea. While I usually don't care very much for sites dedicated to just one particular porn star I've had some good experiences in the past. Membership to a solo site usually means some live chats, maybe a forum or journal of sorts and even if the model herself is not posting someone pretending to be her does, which is the most you can ask for really :). I remember solo sites where the girl would upload random photos of herself every day, answer questions regularly and auction off bits of her clothing or just give it away, you could make special requests for a certain type of outfit or scene and she would deliver. I even remember one site where the community convinced the girl to finally try anal. Overall what I'm saying is that if you're not going to promise hundreds of different hot girls but just one you have to make sure that one girl caters to her fans. This site at a first look appears to do just that. Sure, most of the videos are pretty average sex scenes, but you also get some unique and exotic content: a milk enema video, a peeing scene that is very tastefully done. We get some interesting outfits (black leather jacket and white stockings anyone?) In the beginning Sasha was posting in the forums and they were taking requests for what the next scene was going to be. Everything seemed to be going great. Then it all stopped. No updates, no one answers the forums anymore, it's like a ghost town in there. The first thing in the member's area is a banner proclaiming they will update weekly. There are dozens of users asking when those updates are supposed to happen and dead silence since 2010. It's like a slap in the face. The site looks great, it navigates very easily and has a ton of nice features (each scene is dated, rating buttons for each scene, easy to preview the action and even easier to download stuff) Sasha looks awesome and she does very hardcore stuff, but nonetheless the webmasters dropped the ball in the worst way possible. It almost feels like Sahsa decided to leave the network and they had a huge fight or something. Now don't get me wrong the content that is here is not bad, in fact it looks great, but except for a few videos, you can get the same type of scenes on a dozen other sites that will also have a lot more scenes. I would have loved to see some backstage stuff, some interviews (I know she doesn't speak English, but subtitles or a translator) something to make more of a connection with Sasha. They only have the same type of porn I can get at 21sextury and teencoreclub and on top of it all they aren't even updating anymore. The network itself is not bad, they have a few sites that are still updating regularly and a bunch that have older videos/ clips. But I wouldn't join just for Sasha's site. If some of their lesbian/ dildo content on the other sites looks incredible and you're already in the network Sasha is a nice bonus, but otherwise it's simply not worth it. Check out brutal dildos, huge strap-on lesbians, moms teaching teens or brutal fisting before deciding on this network (those are all sites that still update regularly and have significant amount of content). Those sites bundled into the package also drive the score up from a 60 for this site to a 69 overall package value. 09-24-11  12:21pm Replies (1) Review 117 Shane's World Online (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -41 models in about 90-100 videos. A bit hard to tell since each video clip is taken from a DVD and each DVD has a different amount of video clips. There are around 15 DVD's each one having a few videos, casting info and a few photos as well as the story behind the DVD. But don't get too excited, most of the stories are nonexistent and the photos are 600px × 800px and in very small quantities. - However you do get access to some bonuses. After a month of membership you get access to Collegeinvasion.com. Then there is S.H. TV which streams a few different videos (if you can get it to work, if you have a slow connection don't even bother). You also have some amateur photos and videos around 36 or so. Not very attractive amateurs if I may add. - Kinda fun videos. They are all college themed and rather amusing or at least try to. Some models are hot, not as many as I've seen at other studios, though. Cons: - Couldn't find any download options for videos. - Browsing was funky, the whole, select a DVD then we'll show you the scenes you can see was rather disappointing. At least you could browse based on models. - The amount of content is not really that large, although at first the site seemed overwhelming. Most of the bonus features don't work or are disappointing (I'm thinking of the unattractive amateurs or the lounge which contains some bonus videos that were rather short and boring) -The whole site seemed based on selling the DVD's and keeping you a member while offering as little content as possible. Left a bitter taste in my mouth... Bottom Line: Maybe I'm getting older or maybe I have too high expectations but when I join a site I choose not to purchase a porn DVD. I want some exclusive content, updates and some model info or other bonuses that a DVD couldn't deliver. However when a site makes me feel like I'm just previewing DVD's in order to choose which one to buy, well it just doesn't stand well with me. The Anal Acrobats network (for example) also puts out DVD's and a lot of their content is available in that format but they don't remind you at every second. Their browser doesn't take you to a DVD cover with the options to see video clips from the actual DVD. On the positive the videos are fun and the premise for the actual porn is interesting (blazed and confused= a girl smokes pot and then gets fucked, college courses in anal and strap-on road trip or something like that, are some examples of how this site tries to connect with the college world...which is cool and all, but it just kinda makes you want to buy the DVD's and avoid a monthly fee) To add to the whole feeling of "Why bother paying for this site" I believe at least some of the DVD's are available at Videobox. I know at least Glazed and Confused is. So the final conclusion is don't bother with the website, try and get the DVD's the content is good but not worth a monthly membership. 09-02-09  03:28pm Replies (1) Review 118 Soccer MILFs (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 78 videos in HD (1200 x 720), standard WMV (380 x 200) and quicktime format. - good download speeds - around 37-40 photo galleries (around 683px × 1029px) with around 150-200 photos per set. No zipped archives, but some very hot photos that did not have a videos matching them. - very nice and decently sized network of HD porn in a bunch of niches. - this site surprised me as I hadn't even visited it a few months back when I got my first HD porn pass, but this is one of the best sites in the network in my opinion. The milfs here are truly moms I would love to fuck as they are hotter than many of the teenage models in the rest of the network and most of them didn't seem to be familiar models. Some very hot scenes. Cons: - most scenes are cut in two or three pieces, each one less than 20 minutes - the same problems as the rest of the network, lack of a good search function, videos are all named the same when downloaded, some scenes are too generic (there is a soccer ball around hence the soccer mom milf porn...) - this was the only site in the network where streaming was funky and slow at times... Bottom Line: This site has what all the HD network lacks...personality and a certain air about the models that makes them hot. Maybe becuase they are supposed to be more in charge, maybe the girls just resonate with me, but I downloaded almost every video on the site. As opposed to other sites in this network I feel like Soccer Milfs is really, really arousing and a very, very good porn site. I think it all comes down to the models acting different than girls in everyday porn. They are usually dressed up or look like well off women that actually want sex with some random dudes. The girls seemed to initiate some of the scenes or at least be more willing than the regular girl that is often portrayed as just an accessory. I felt like there were real women having sex in front of the camera not just models who were thinking about the check at the end of it all. The content still feels like a major company's product and it's nowhere near the kind of personal connection that models have with the user on smaller networks, but here I actually felt turned on by most videos, like back in the days that Playboy was actually cutting edge and didn't show Marge on the cover just to get a few more sales...know what I mean? This is main stream porn at it's best not it's lowest. The only complaint is that there aren't enough videos and the whole cutting scenes in pieces means you actually get only 30-40 scenes once you're don merging everything together....give us more!!! All and all, I recommend this site wholeheartedly. Check it out guys, especially if you like HD porn. This one alone is worth the membership fee, combined with the big network behind it, it's a steal. 10-17-09  06:08pm Replies (0) Review 119 Spoiled Virgins (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Network access to many sites with similar content (only one site in the network has more mature women, the rest are almost all built around young adult) - Around 225 scenes available on this site with about 2 updates per month. - Video quality ranges a lot, some old scenes are as low as 320x240, but the more recent stuff is 1024x768 and some are as high as 1920x1080. The average is 832x468 25 frames per sec - Zip archives for images as well as slideshow option on the site. Images are 1024x768 and around 150- 200 images per set. - Model pages are very nice and help you find other scenes the girl did on the network - Very fast downloads, maxing my internet connection regularly. No Time-outs, no DRM or other issues. - The models are hot, a lot of familiar faces from other Russian sites, but also quite a lot of new girls, some of which might be exclusive. - Most scenes are group sex, two guys and one girl although there are a handful of two girls and one guy Cons: - The web design is a bit dated, no search function no quick category filter, no easy way to separate all girl-girl-boy scenes from boy-boy-girl. - Sometimes clicking on the show all girls link will actually lead you to the models on another site (Ifinallyfuckedher) meaning that really the best way to navigate this site is by looking at the scene thumbs, which are not very descriptive. - They have animated ads in the members area, pretty prominently. - Some strange cuts in the scenes (it's all part of the "virgin" gimmick- cut away from penetration, cut back in and magically there's "blood" on his penis. Not really a big deal, but a bit distracting) - Some older content is really unwatchable (several scenes with very bad resolution/ lighting) Bottom Line: A lot of Russian porn goes for of MAXIMUM HARDCORE action with innocent girls. Just think about sites like First Anal Quest, Gapeland, Defiled 18. It's almost like you have to have anal gapes to be a Russian porn site. Spoiled Virgins and in fact the entire network here doesn't really follow that rule. Sure, there is an anal only site, but for the most part the girls here do group sex without DP's and/or doubleanal shenanigans. In fact the spin of this site (as the title suggests) is the idea that these girls have never had vaginal sex and the first penetration is a big deal for them. To sell the idea the site has a fake doctor check the girls out and proclaim them virgin and even goes as far as using fake blood in several of the shots. While all of this is not really that interesting and in my opinion only takes away about 6 minutes out of the rather short 20-25 minute scenes what was interesting for me was the way the girls act when the guys first penetrates them. In all scenes they act eager, yet shy. Hesitant, sometimes even in some pain, but ready to guide the male model inside them. It's all acting and some do it better than others, but overall the girls really seem into the sex in a way that a horny virgin girl might be. Those few moments of the initial penetration make the scenes here truly worth it for me. I quickly skip through the phony doctor (who sometimes strips naked to have sex with the girl...talk about dedication to their patients ) and the set-up which is in Russian with no subtitles. But once you get to the actual sex scenes there are some great, great shots. Once the doctor is gone almost all scenes continue with a few moments when the girl is penetrated and another girl or a guy watches the whole action. It probably sounds lame, but trust me the whole act can be surprisingly arousing. Once the initial awkwardness is taken care of the sex goes to some pretty hot threesomes without going into hardcore anal mode. It's pretty much just BJ's and vaginal sex here, but with some pretty good angles and positions. While the lack of DP's could be a disappointment for some it also means that the site managed to get some very hot looking girls that are probably not willing to show up on other sites. Combine that with the somewhat different acting and you get a pretty decent site with an unique spin. Another plus is that the locations are varied and while a lot of the scenes are filmed around a couch at least it's a different couch. Also the male models are varied and there are several who look right around the same age like the girls and don't come off as complete perverts who creepily moan into the camera. The angles and light are decent, with a good mix of wide-shots and some close-ups. One disappointment is that a lot of cum-shots are on the girls chests, not cream-pies and very little swallowing. Overall I'd recommend this network and this site to anyone who loves young Eastern European models and wants some different scenarios past the usual gonzo porn. There are many models who were unknown to me and several that are familiar faces, but I'd say the vast majority are petite and very hot. It's a combination you can't go wrong with. Don't expect actual virgins and while the network does have some Deepthroat and anal centric sites most of the content is a tad more softcore than the vast majority of Eastern European porn out there. 06-11-12  06:19pm Replies (0) Review 120 Stocking Stars (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px) - A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise) - The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time) - Some hot models that really seem into it - Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar. - Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs) Cons: - The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then) - The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option) - More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos)) - The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.) - Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie. - Some sets are mislabeled Bottom Line: This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name) Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so. To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like). The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings. Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music. Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties. Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites. Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey). Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion) That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network. 09-18-11  12:42pm Replies (0) Review 121 Sweet Members (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A lot of content. The membership offers you access to 25 websites (sweet auditions, bukkakepiss, french fisting, max hardcore, angel videos etc. Most of the sites are hardcore and most of the content is of pretty hot girls) Each website has around 10-20 models minimum each one with anywhere from 1 to 5 videos and just as many photo shoots. Add some bonus galleries (both video and photos) and dvd content and you have quite a decent network. -A lot of cute models/hot scenes and a lot of hardcore scenes (the camera man/interview person was a woman which made the whole scenes somehow much more hot...in fact the interviews I saw on this site are some of the best I have ever experienced...but then again I love interviews.) - Videos come in various resolutions and types (wmv, quicktime, mpg) and some download very fast. However, the quality of many videos is sub-par. I guess that makes them smaller and easier to download but still.... - Streaming worked very well for me. Cons: - The biggest problem I had with this network was it's inconsistency. Some sites had poor quality videos (Athens Angels come to mind, with fuzzy videos at poor quality) While others have up to 640x480. The models are also rather random, there are some chubby girls and some mature women but you have to manually look for them; most of the models are teens or teen-looking. Finally some sites had easy navigation while others made you dig for the content. - Speaking of navigation it could also be improved. It was a bit buggy at times with pages loading the same models twice, and some sites not letting me use the open in new tab option which made my navigation very hard... - Finally, the download speed for me was very bad and many of the videos crashed before they were done. However since my connection is very poor right now so I am not going to take points away for it. Just be warned that a spotty connection can result in every video reaching 0 bytes after it's about 25% done. Bottom Line: The network has a lot of issues. Most videos are available only in pieces. The fact that there is no real way to search for chubby or mature models (or any kind of models in fact) in the whole network also makes the navigation unpleasant. Sure we have a search model by name but unless you know the girl's stage name this is not really useful. The previews for videos are very poor quality (they reminded me of 70's porn shots). There is no zipped archive for photos and so on...You get the idea, the network could be better. I personally also had issues downloading videos but I blame that on my poor internet connection. However, on the plus side I had never seen so many pee, anal and group sex scenes of hot women and teenagers. The female cameraman was also a nice change, but there are also videos of sex without any back story if you prefer that. Overall a nice variety of hardcore porn (including a bunch of Max Hardcore videos which are pretty good if you like female abuse and ridiculous anal) All and all the network has good content, which can be very interesting if you are into water sports, anal, or bukakke (however it's spelled) but the navigation and user features could be improved. Worth checking out and if you like the Max Hardcore style of videos or the Pierre Woodman. For me it worked for others the issues might be too much to deal with. 08-29-09  03:24pm Replies (0) Review 122 Teach My Ass (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 08-14-09  04:56am  (Update History) Reason: Added info and expanded bottom line opinion. Pros: - Approximately 74, good quality (640 x 480) Wmv videos with no download limit or any kind of protection. - Just as many photo sessions with anywhere from 150 for older sets to 400-500 for more recent ones. Each image is in either 853px × 1280px or 1280px × 853px. Sadly no zips for these files makes downloading harder. - Access to 15 other teen hardcore sites if you get the teen core club deal. - The premise of the site is that a specialist will help a young girl loose her anal virginity for 100$. To play in with that there is a short interview and then the specialist takes a pretty wide range of dildos and other anal toys to the girl's ass. He then fucks her and cums on her face or more rarely inside her doing a cream-pie. - Most girls are very cute (the site's biggest bonus are the models) and it's surprising to see what they are willing to let someone do to their ass. - Many close-ups and all videos are POV (which can be bad at times as some scenes get static, but it works) Cons: - Often when downloading a large list of videos the site logged me out, thus confusing my download manager (caption word log-in makes it impossible for download managers to get in). Also each video saves under the same name so I had to manually re-name them. - Somewhat annoying to navigate, no search function, no model sorting system. This is especially frustrating as some models from this site are on other sites from the network but there is no way to see where. It would be great to see all scenes done by one model. - Girls speak poor or no English, making interviews often boring to watch (the guy translates in Russian, then back in English...also his voice get's annoying). - Videos tend to get repetitive and not enough focus is put on the girls, with (IMO) too much close-up of genitals and interior of anus. In each scene there are about 10-15 minutes of the girl just sitting there with her ass in the air and the guy probing her. Hot I guess...but we loose all of her reactions... Bottom Line: I am a fan of anal movies involving teenagers and this is one of the best sites in this niche out there. The girls are hot and the extent of anal abuse they receive is pretty impressive (almost every other scene has the guy stick a flash light in there at some point...which can be a bit too graphic, but if you like that kind of stuff it's pretty hot). However, there are some things that disappointed me. The site's and the whole network's navigation is one of the biggest cons. I really wish there was a way to see all scenes from a model, regardless of which site she is on. I didn't realize one of my favorite Try Teens models was on here until today... Another big con is that the site focuses too little on their biggest asset, namely the gorgeous models. We loose their reactions when they are getting anally probed because all videos are in POV and they focus mostly on their bottoms. Sure it's great to see a close-up of her gaping hole, but why don't we also see her face, cringing or looking pleased or anything? Also many videos skip the getting undressed part, jumping from fully dressed to completely naked. A big part of the foreplay is lost right there. At least in the more recent videos some girls keep parts of their clothing on, making the scenes a lot sexier. Finally, the fact that each video has the same name when downloaded and that the older videos are only available as 7 or 8 parts...well, it all drags the site's score down. What keeps it up there are the very, very hot models. The girls look great and seeing them smile shyly as they get on that anal probing table... It's worth it. The porn on this site has some of the best looking teens around and the way they act makes most scenes incredibly hot (An uncertain glance into the camera, their cum covered smile at the end...it all makes the scenes feel real in a way not even amateur porn manages to do it). If the site owners would learn this and showcase their models even more, while also adding just a few more user options this would be one of the best networks around. Like this it's just a good site, worth checking out if you like teens and anal (and have the money for the pricey membership). 08-01-09  08:45am Replies (0) Review 123 Teen Bitch Club (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Approximately 132 scenes each one with Mp4 (needs quicktime) videos in either high or medium quality as well as around 50 or less high quality photos (853px × 1280px, also I'd like to say that the light and camera they use is very good. I'm not a fan of photos but this site had some good ones IMO) and around 200 screenshots (720px × 540px the problem with the screenshots being that theya re clearly taken by an automated program, some of them cutting out the girl's head or part of the action. Theya re mostly good to get an idea of how the movie is going to be.) - Each video has a trailer, which is really helpful when deciding what to download. - Okay navigation (it loads fast and there are many options. You can stream movies, download clips or the whole movie. They also have zipped archives for photos) - Good customer service (it's easy to contact them and they responded fast, solving my issues with the streaming) - Good streaming, although a bit slow to load on my machine. Cons: - The models are a bit disappointing. I joined this network mostly for Lez Cuties which has a ton of rather unknown (although if you see a lot of Russian porn you must know Sasha and Autumn), barely legal-looking girls. However this site has a bunch of not so young looking girls that are mostly well known porn stars (Eva Angelina, Bree Olsen, Allyson Pierce, etc.) These girls are hot but I've seen a lot of them before. Then again I guess the site is named Teen Bitch Club...not New Members of the Teen Bitch Club. - The navigation on the site could have been better. There was no way to filter "anal" or "group sex" videos from the rest. Although there are some hot examples of both hidden in the site. - I have never seen such unflattering preview photos when browsing for movies. They seem to prefer photos where the girl's face is contorted into a big "O" or she just looks funky (eyes half closed, can't really see the girl because there is a huge close-up on her vagina, etc.) Bottom Line: This site has me thorn. On some days I hate it on others I love it. Sometimes the download speed is ridiculously slow on others it jumps up to 1mb per video. They have that great trailer (I really enjoy trailers for videos, just so I know what I'm downloading)but then they choose to use horrible photos for previews. A girl I thought was hideous turned out to be Lexi Belle when I actually paid attention to the video description. Why? because their preview when browsing offers usually 4 photos one big one and 3 small ones. The big one is usually the girl with a ridiculous face and the other ones tend to be close-ups of genitalia. Maybe this works for others but for me (I watch porn mostly for the girl's face) it was disappointing. However, when your biggest problem with a site is the bad preview photos it means it's doing the rest correctly, right? After all the site delivers what it promises: It has plenty of good content of young models being fucked. It even has some anal and group sex scenes...but then why doesn't it let me search those scenes by adding a button that filters a scene by category? Well at least is has a model search which is very nice. But then again most models don't have any info and I found one or two models where the only photos they have are screenshots (for one girl it was the same screen cap repeated three times.) So what is the bottom line? Good videos with good looking girls but not a lot of new faces. Good quality but a bit of frustration (mp4 format) and decent navigation with a a few mistakes. A decent website if you like teen-looking girls, but not the best by far. The network access does compensate that though, making this a good enough site. Look through the free tour and if you see more then 5 hot models or scenes sign-up it will be worth it. 09-06-09  03:02pm Replies (3) Review 124 Teen Core Club (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: - This network continues to have some of the best looking young girls, doing very hardcore scenes - A lot of new faces in porn (they somehow continue to find girls that don't show up on other porn sites. I believe this site was the first to show Aspen, Isabel, Eva and a few other popular Russian girls that have since shown up many other places. Still It's nice to see them here first) -Each site has a niche and delivers what it promises (ass to mouth, DP, etc.) But all of the sites are hardcore and there is a lot of anal and deepthroat (In many of the more recent scenes they make sure the girls make-up runs down their faces so they look all disheveled). -The videos are pretty good quality (colors are a bit funky, but nothing too major) and you get a ton of images (but no zip files, so you have to use a site ripping tool to get all images) -Simple navigation and layout that can be a pain in the ass, but does work okay most of the time Cons: -Very simple navigation, no way to search for one model across all sites. Now way to preview the videos and streaming is a joke (it leads to another download page) -The site doesn't load half the time (As I write this the main website is down, but I can log into a few of the member sites) -They log you out at random intervals and customer support is all but non existent. -There are no different options for videos so sometimes I have a 2 gb file to download other times it's 300mb... you never know. It sucks when you want to watch a quick video of one girl only to realize it will take an hour to download her particular scene. -No overall network access (if you're used to 21sextury this network will disappoint). -Sometimes the videos are too much to the point. I enjoy scenes with no long stories, but every since scene here goes from fully clothed girl to dick in her but within 5 minutes... It's like they are always racing to get it done. Not to mention they go through the same positions Bottom Line: I believe I mentioned this before in almost all of my reviews of this network. The girls are hot and they do incredible hardcore. The make-up team doesn't over do it so the models don't look like the average Hustler porn stars (I hate it when a site takes a cute 20 something year old and plaster her with make-up...why hide the beauty? WHY? anyhow, this site doesn't do that so kudos to them). The light and settings aren't all pink and bubble gum cute but aren't the run of the mill porn either. In other words you won't feel like a pedophile, but you know you're not watching mainstream Hustler porn either. Add to everything I mentioned above the fact that these girls do great deepthroats, anal, DP, now they are starting to add threesomes... overall this network should be the best out there. Notice how I said should be... the sad truth is that their webmasters don't give a shit. The sites feel old, and in over a year of membership I haven't seen any significant updates or improvements. The downloads crash, the site auto logs you out, it won't load properly and there is no network overarching website (you have to log into each site individually and there is no way to get all scenes by one model.) To make things worse, instead of fixing what they have the owners decided to simply add new sites that are run just the same. In one year I saw Maketeengape, cumholic, defiled18, hardcoreyouth and a handful of other sites many abandoned since, some still updating occasionally. Basically it feels like they only care about saying they have +47 sites bonus even if most have 10-15 scenes and will never be updated again. There are also some other minor annoyances. All videos are named the same so if you batch download them you have to go back and re-name everything. Downloading images is a pain (use neodownloader to crawl their site and grab everything, trust me it's much easier than anything else) Also the images are plentiful, to the point where you get too many of them. I mean there are 20 images of the exact same scene with just a small variation (I feel like their photographer simply sets the camera on auto shutter and shoots 1000 images of each scene) I love the photos from sites like nubiles and this is just a disappointment by comparison. Another small issue for me is the male model, who is the same in every scene. He simply doesn't look like he cares, he goes through the motions almost mechanically, he also has a huge scar on his arm and I know this is nitpicky but why can't they get another guy once in a while? The older videos have a bunch of different dudes and somehow it makes it look more interesting. I guess since I'm complaining about the content of the videos I might as well mention that they get repetitive very fast. Don't get me wrong I love seeing different girls, but why do they all have to go through the same motions. I am at a point where I can skip into almost any video on this site and guess what will happen. Minute 10 usually means anal from behind, minute 12 the dude will jump off her and we get some ass to mouth for 3 minutes or so, then some reverse cowgirl anal... and so on... The 21 sextury network which also brings a ton of anal videos somehow manages to make it interesting and different. Here the girls are on a boat, here they are in fishnets, here there are two of them and so on... a bit of variation would be nice. At least in the more recent videos the camera man asks the girls a few questions which seem to confuse them more than anything. I guess it's a step in the right direction nonetheless. Oh, now you can also get the scenes on DVD so there are a bunch of banners advertising just that, I don't know who still buys DVD's but I guess that's nice? Why not download the scene and burn your own though... especially since the streaming is non-existent. Anyhow, overall I gave the network a lower score than last time I reviewed it. The fact that one year has passed and nothing changed on their technical side is not good. It used to be that this was the bets place for hardcore young sex, but now you can look at many other networks who are growing and don't charge almost $50 for similar content ($9 for 21sextury anyone?) Sorry to say that if they don't improve their act soon I'll have to move on... such a shame though because the girls are incredible... such a shame. 08-27-11  10:59am Replies (5) Review 125 Teen Core Club (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -young, hot girls doing hardcore -a lot of sites/content/niches (anal, cumshot, regular sex, outdoors sex) -the browsing is simple (but it can be a pain) -just action, no complex stories or descriptions (depends what you like, this could be eitehr a good thing or a bad one) Cons: -the browsing can get annoying and log-ing into each site get's old (but it's simple) -it's hard to find all scenes of one model -little English and no back story / little intro (except for teachmyass and spermatino) the guy just walks in and does the girl Bottom Line: I like hardcore barely legal girls. I don't like girls that look under 18 or try too look like lolitas. I like a bit of innocence a firm body and sex. This site offers exactly that. I wish their navigation was better and I wish they could let me sort the models but even so I like it and have almost all their scenes saved up on my HDD. Great site in my opinion 08-01-09  02:44pm Replies (0) Shown : 101-125 of 155 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.68 seconds.