| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
51
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
05-02-10 03:52pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
52
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
03-07-10 01:57am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
53
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
02-03-10 08:15pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
54
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Sharp Quality Videos.
Large Updates.
Exclusive Material.
Recent Addition of Boy/Girl Hardcore.
Lots of model info. |
| Cons: |
Download speeds average at best. (Compared to sites such as Videobox and Nubiles). I do not use download managers.
Although it appears to be improving; search functions still need work.
Site design seems to never change (I've been a member off and on for several years.)however; site content is changing for the better with the addition of lesbian and boy/girl hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a really good site where you will find young, beautiful girls photographed and filmed in a most excellent manner.
The factors that keep it from be a GREAT site and getting a rating of 90 or greater are download speeds and search functions.
On a short term basis the site is worth the money. If download speeds were improved, streaming and slide show functions added I would definitely consider a long term membership. |
|
02-02-10 05:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
55
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
%100 Exclusive Material
I love how their photos are shot! Very natural looking.
Unique content that brings out the models personality |
| Cons: |
MORE updates please!
Didn't really like their old school layout.
Download speed was ok. |
| Bottom Line: |
Is it worth my money? Hell YEA! Love the videos especially. Their models are always fresh and doing something different in every updates. The only bad part about this site is that they don't update enough! I believe its once every 5 days. But even with the less updates the site is stacked with years of updates and videos to entertain you for a while. |
|
01-31-10 03:27am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
56
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
01-23-10 09:10pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
57
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful women
- Many amateurs and ‘first-timers’
- An opportunity to see some porn stars ‘before they were stars’
- Newer files have an HD option
- Decent download speeds
- Huge site, with apparently regular updates
- Public nudity / exhibitionism
Please note - my intention is to review only the public nudity part of this site - there are many other general reviews that cover the site more completely |
| Cons: |
- The set-ups are all essentially the same – gets repetitive
- Scenes are broken up into several files
- Every file opens with a brief title screen which is VERY annoying when linking multiple files
- Expensive
- Very little variety in the type of model (not a con if you like this type of model though) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my first review of a site that I probably shouldn’t have joined, but I’ll be objective. I have no real interest in solo-girl masturbation sites. All my other reviews are of sites that I had an interest in. The reason I joined was for the advertised public nudity. My review will focus primarily on that for anyone who has the same interest.
As other reviewers have noted, there is a lack of variety with the models. For people like me who like FTV Girls’ taste in models, this isn’t an issue, but for those who like some variety this may be a negative. There is a lack of variety is scene set-up too. Most models start outside with a little flashing and then move indoors for some masturbation. Some models are more playful and do more outdoor flashing and some outdoor masturbation too.
My reason for joining FTV Girls was because it appeared that there was a lot of public nudity. This is an under-served niche and though the site was not something I’d join otherwise, I joined to see the public stuff.
The public stuff is certainly there in quantity. Most of the models do some public flashing. As a public nudity site (and I realize that this isn’t specifically such) this is pretty tame, but well within industry norms for U.S. sites. Obviously all the models will have differing levels of daring when it comes to public nudity. A few are quite daring, a few won’t do it, and the majority do some. For most models, the extent of their public flashing isn’t all that public – they dress in skimpy clothes and flash for the camera on side streets and empty parks. A few – very few – are as daring as the best of the public nudity sites on the web.
Many of the public nudity scenes are shot in the same area, which might lead one to presume that they are staged and have the support of the property owners. If you presume that, please take note of the webmaster’s comments below: these scenes are not staged. In my opinion, having the outdoor scenes as spontaneous as this is the essence of a good public nudity site.
One thing that would normally be a big negative for me is actually a positive here. The scenes are broken down into several smaller files. I normally despise that, but if all you’re looking for is the public stuff, that works out in your favor. One added thing that is DEFINITELY a negative is that at the beginning of every file there is a title screen. When you link several clips the action gets interrupted by a two-second title screen every few minutes. The site really needs to think about fixing this. Surely a watermark is enough to identify your material.
If you’re a fan of public nudity and have run through the sites that specialize in that, FTV Girls is worth a look. There is a lot of material here, and it is well done too. Public nudity (done in the U.S.) isn’t well served, and FTV Girls adds some quality stuff to the available material. |
|
12-31-09 09:01am
Replies (5)
|
Review
58
|
FTV Girls
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Long overdue re-review of one of the internet's best known porn sites. Originally rated a 91.
- The newest videos are 1440x1080 with hefty 8000 bitrates, also available in a much smaller 352x240 resolution and a middle ground 720x480 resolution version.
- Pictures have been upgraded to 1600 long end, older pictures range from 1052 to 1280 long end. All are downloadable in zips.
- Site runs very fast for me. I consistently get 20% higher speed on downloads than my average download speed.
- As much exclusive content as just about any site I can name off the top of my head.
- Sets are usually more fun than other sites, a little more daring with some public sets, lots of pre-masturbation flashing as well.
- One of the first sites to have a lot of "squirting" content.
- One of the best sites for finding older content of current hardcore stars. Eva Angelina, Sativa Rose, Jenaveve Jolie, Amy Reid to name a select few have some early career solo sets here. |
| Cons: |
- Videos are still split into parts with no full scene download option. I'm not really for sure what the reasoning is behind this practice, but it gets them a few points reduction.
- This is a personal preference one. I know a lot of members wanted newer, fresher models near the amateur level and they have delivered that. That's not something I like though. I prefer the glammed up models.
- Some of the content can become tedious. Like watching a model trying to flash her boobs for 4 minutes. Some of the older sets feature some of porn's wilder girls who just do it.
- A small con to end the cons, I would like to see more pictures from the sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
I seem to be in a porn lull right now. I decided to try FTV out again after nearly 2 years away from it.
The first thing that I'm going to talk about is that the older content is better than the newer content. I think that was because of the models. Eva Angelina's sets here are some of her best on the internet. Also, I stand by my previous statement that the first set with Amy Reid is Amy's best set of her career.
Of the models that have been added since I was last a member (December 2007), I downloaded and plan to keep the content of 12 of them. They update roughly 4 times a month, so at best, I downloaded and will keep 12 out of 90 models. Even at that, most of the 12 are known porn stars.
Most of the other models are girls that look like girls I went to school with or could be the pizza delivery girl. That's great for some members, but I'm not really into the amateur, girl next door look. Though I do really like Tessa, one of the newer models, who I don't think is a porn star.
One really good part for me is that I lost my FTV files from 2007 when one of my hard drives fried. I was able to go back and get those really great pre-2008 sets.
Overall, the site is still one of the best overall sites. It just isn't that great for me. I kind of feel like I just re-joined to get the content I already had.
If it was my first time joining it, I would probably score it in the low 90s.
The split video parts are annoying. It definitely isn't because of size restrictions or concerns. The parts are rarely over 8 minutes each. This is compounded by having a splash screen on nearly all videos. So even if you line the parts up in a media player, there is still the hesitation between loading the parts plus a 2 second splash screen.
I tried joining the files into one big file, but there is still a splash screen every 8 minutes. I could edit the video and cut the splash screen out, but that's more work than I should have to do for a premium site.
The complaint with wanting more pictures should be taken as a compliment. I've always liked their photo sets especially the more public ones and would like to see 250-300 photos from each set.
You really can't knock the site on technical quality. The 1440x1080 videos are very crisp. I do wish more sites would optimize the bitrates to fit the resolution size. I would imagine a 1440x1080 video could run smoothly with a 4000-5000 bitrate, but that's nitpicking.
Most of the interviews are fun enough. It goes back to the model in each one. Eva Angelina is very funny in hers.
The site could easily score 95+ with a few changes. It's hard to say a site has a potential when it has been around as long as FTV has, but it is the best word I can think of in this situation. For those into newer, more unknown models check it out. Some of these newer models they have are really cute and come across as very genuine. Still recommended, especially for those who have never joined it. |
|
12-03-09 12:52am
Replies (7)
|
Comment
59
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
11-23-09 06:53am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
60
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
08-20-09 08:30pm
|
Comment
61
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
07-26-09 05:30am
Replies (3)
|
Review
62
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very pretty girls
Extremely erotic situations
Great masturbation scenes
Awesome toys
No scripts
The quality of the videos are extremely good
No limits for downloads
Great library of previous models |
| Cons: |
Content can feel old after a while
There are only some fetish scenes that improve the variety of the site performances
Girls are new, but will be seen in more hardcore videos in the near future on other sites
Updates are once a week or so |
| Bottom Line: |
The girls of FTV are new to the porn scene and provide a refreshing look at women trying to break into the industry. They are normally, gorgeous and young but every so often you will find an older girl who is looking for an adventure.
Some of the scenes are so unscripted that the models get caught by security guards at malls, hotels or office complexes. The girls also make themselves so crazy that they cum so hard they squirt (surprising themselves and the cameraman).
The content is consistently excellent and the girls are extremely hot. No men therefore no dicks, just a girl, her toys and hands. If that's your thing, you will love this site. |
|
07-20-09 01:09pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
63
|
FTV Girls
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great looking girls
-Natural (no airbrushed crap)
-No music!
-Solo masturbation shoots (NO DUDES!)
-Lots of squirting |
| Cons: |
-VERY Slow download time
-Many low quality pics
-Not enough high quality photgraph/pics
-Not as much content as advertised
-You can find the best parts of vids and better quality pics for free. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV girls is a good site with a great selection of girls that do exactly what I like... High quality solo shoots. Problem is as I see advertised this site is not devoted to PICTURES but VIDEOS. Though they are great quality vids, they take too daggum long to Download! I have found my favorite parts in many of these vids for free. Plus I can find HIGH quality PICS for FREE for my detailed viewing pleasure. If you want to take a look at their content because you can't help yourself go ahead and pay the month fee but I wouldn't go past that time frame cause overall the frustration isn't worth it. They need to make DLs faster and have full photo shoots for me to become a ftv website customer again. I believe you can buy DVDs I'm not 100% sure on that but I think you can somewhere and if they do then I certainly will be buying some. |
|
07-02-09 01:03am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
64
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
06-29-09 05:33pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
65
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
06-11-09 11:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
66
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
06-09-09 07:42am
Replies (7)
|
Rating
67
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
05-26-09 03:59pm
|
Review
68
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge Collection.
- HD option for videos available.
- ZIP download option for photosets.
- Hot models.
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- No DRM videos protection.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Good website design.
- Frequent updates. |
| Cons: |
- Expensive.
- Navigation needs improvement.
- Old content's quality is average.
- Download limit (25 Gb/day).
- No hardcore content.
- Updates could be faster.
- Not enough bonus content offered. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV Girls is a good babes adult website that surely needs improvements.
First of all, it's current collection is huge at the moment with lots of models to choose from but please notice that there is NO hardcore content offered.
Videos (new ones) can be downloaded in two formats (.wmv and .DivX), HD (.wmv 8000kb/sec) is available which is totally awesome. Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and new ones quality is excellent.
There is no DRM videos protection but there is a daily download limit of 25 Gp. Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
Website design is cool but there navigation needs lots of improvement because there is no search feature just a models name list and site's collection seems chaotic. In general lines, models are very hot.
Monthly subscription price is expensive (30 USD) and there is no trial feature. Bonus content is tiny as it contains only a few scenes.
Site updates weekly and content is daited. Updates could come faster, at my opinion.
In conclusion, if you are into such content you can try this one. Recommended. |
|
05-01-09 04:44am
Replies (4)
|
Review
69
|
FTV Girls
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill.
-Mostly extremely attractive girls.
-Large website. Presently has 380 girls, 658,500+ MB of video, and 106,000+ photos.
-Updates weekly. This is fine for such a large site. I don't expect several updates a day as these are not copied from an archive of DVD's.
-All videos exclusively shot for the site. |
| Cons: |
-Close to zero ethnic diversity. Of the 380 girls, I found only three Asian and three Black. A lot of variety as long as all you want are white girls.
-No variety as to age. I did not find one model over 25. If there are please, let me know.
-A few are short or tall, but I saw no other variety as to body type. None I could find are even remotely out of the norm of slim and thin. There is a little variety as to breast size, but most are small breasted.
-While not a glamour model site, not exactly not glamour either. The girls are nicely made up, but few seem to be completely natural. It felt to me that the girls are made to look how the site wants them to look. Since the site sells itself as ordinary girls, I feel this is a negative. I was expecting girls who looked more like real amateurs. Too professional and artificial.
-Most videos are only very poor quality Divx or 680x420 WMV. Adequate but not the greatest quality. Since January 2008 the site is updating with true HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Considering how many reviews as well as the number of exceptionally high scores, I was rather disappointed. Many of the videos were not of the best quality and the videos are not easily downloaded. Each girl has a page or pages of her. On each page there are usually four videos. There is no way to download all four, so you have to do this individually. Every video on the page is labelled by number, so the next page or the next girl has the same number as the last page. You have to download individually and then change the file name. Otherwise you have files by number only and after downloading have a completely disorganized mess to sort through. The search is only by date or model name, so it is difficult to find what you want if say, you want to see all the public nudity videos. Are they seriously expecting me to go through 380 models, and some have multiple pages, to search? The types of videos are of several types-public nudity, solo nude scenes and masturbation. Most of the videos are masturbation; probably at least half. I am mostly into the public nudity and solo nude scenes and finding good quality scenes to download is unnecessarily difficult and time consuming. The public nude scenes are fairly tame in my opinion, and lack the fun and spontaneity of, for example Publicflash.com. The nude scenes are ok, comparable to the ATK sites videos. The masturbation scenes had a lot of dildo use, fingering, as well as fisting, not my taste. You often hear the photographer in the background. Not intrusive or terribly annoying, but not spontaneous either. Comparable to, but not worse than Simonscans.com or Mattsmodels.com in this regard. Overall, a lot of attractive girls, a big site, some HD videos, a lot of inadequate quality videos, some interesting masturbation scenes, and too much glamour posed by the numbers model photos and videos. Many times I had the feeling the site had no genuine erotic passion and lacked a feeling of fun. However I cannot deny this is a good site for those who like this kind of material because it is so large. |
|
03-08-09 09:25am
Replies (12)
|
Review
70
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Each girl has a boatload of content. A lot of videos, a lot of pictures. Each page has the girl's measurements and other data.
+Two very high quality download options - DivX and WMV (640x480)
+Except for the FTV image that lasts 2 seconds at the start of each video, there are no watermarks.
+The interviews are rather fun to listen to.
+Image sets downloadable as ZIP's.
+Complete model directory with description of what type of content is offered for the girl, size of the videos, and number of pics available.
+Sneak peek page to see what upcoming updates will be.
+Girl-girl updates are separate from all the solo content.
+Newer content is available in HD 720p.
+If there is more than one set of content for a girl then the pages will link to each other - very nice.
+Site is super fast as are the downloads.
+Friendly to Europeans, cheaper to buy from EU Direct Pay (20.31EUR = $26.52 at 1EUR=$1.306 today)
+100% original content |
| Cons: |
-Weak update schedule (1girl/wk)
-Pictures watermarked (although subtly)
-Newer updates require secondary login (only once though)
-Majority of content is all solo material (sans the separate girl-girl content which smaller in size) and mostly softcore (but there are masturbation videos)
-All movies are split file.
-Girl-girl movies not updated as frequently as solo material (looks like 1 update per month)
-Girls don't have last names, so like Karups and other sites, you get girls named with numbers (Andrea, Andrea 2, Andrea 3, etc.)
-Bonus content is nothing more than some more content that could otherwise be featured as future updates (besides the fact that they are hosted on the FTV domain)
-There are other FTV owned sites (DanielleFTV) but they are not included with membership.
-No site search.
-What do the colored bars next to each girl mean? Intensity???
-Expensive, $30/mo - no special from TBP, and no multi-month deal. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not going to say the site is lacking, quite the contrary, but the site is pretty straightforward and doesn't make it hard at all to find all their content, so there isn't much to complain or boast about with regards to the site.
The content is super high quality. Be it the videos or the photos, you will not be disappointed nor will you be unable to enjoy it. Obviously if you don't fancy softcore or solo masturbation, you will be out of place. There is no boy/girl content (unless you consider the guy off screen conducting interviews b/g). The girl/girl content is OK, but pornstar-quality lesbian content is never that good when you compare it to true amateur lesbian content, and FTV lesbian content is pornstar-quality. This is not to say the content is bad, it just is not what some people are looking for.
Overall it is a good site, but the biggest problem I have is that there is only 1 update per week, for mostly solo content, at a costly $30/mo. Yikes!
I can understand the update schedule especially if they are putting a lot of effort into producing one girl's worth of updates per week, and I can understand the focus (hey every site has their calling card), but $30/mo with NO available discounts in any shape or fashion? Urrrrrr... Make it cheaper per month ($10-$15/mo...because this is all I think it is worth) and you have a 90+ rated site in my book. |
|
02-03-09 10:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
71
|
FTV Girls
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality videos.
+Beautiful selection of young models, with different body types and sizes. They don't all look the same.
+Intimate videos with Real Orgasms.
+Lots of public nudity
+Normally 3-4 galleries per model update, around 60 images per gallery.
+2-4 videos per model update. |
| Cons: |
-Pricey ($29.95 per month, I got offered $20 per month when I went to cancel)
-Images could stand to be bigger. Currently are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. Not as high quality as some other sites.
-They do have BigPics, where are 3000x4000 or 2000x3000 but it's a seperate page from it's self and no way to know from the model update if they are available for her or not.
-No search function. Have to go by update or models first name.
-Not all models are actually first timers. For example a recent update was Franziska, who I saw alot on ALS Scan when I was recently a member to there.
-Older videos and pictures not that good of quality.
-Only updated on average 1-2x per week.
-Some videos are behind the scenes of the photo shoot, so you hear the great 3,2,1 camera click. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a site that I was a member of awhile back and liked back then but it was a bit too pricey for me. The site can get alittle too extreme for me (huge toys or fisting, etc) but decided to give it another try.
Photo's: In todays day and age of high resolution and high quality, FTV's photos are step behind the competition. Current updates photos are 1062x1600 for portrait and 1600x1062 for landscape. While updates in 07 where, 797x1200. 06 where 712x1072. So as you can see, while FTV keeps improving every year, it still doesn't compare to sites that have 3000 or 4000px images. But FTV does offer BigPics. They are 3000x4000px or 2000x3000px. But it's only of select galleries/models. I don't know why FTV doesn't do what ALS Scans do and offer two download sizes, normal res and high res. Since offering BigPics proves they have them available. For $30 a month, not offering them as standard is unacceptable.
Videos: 08 videos are available in 8000kb/s HD WMV's, 3000kb/s WMV's & Divx vidoes. Anything prior to December 07, is available in 2100kb/s WMV & Divx. The 8000kb/s videos are great quality, unfortunately my pc can't play them smoothly. So I'm stuck with the 3000kb/s. The quality is pretty good but not as good as some 720p videos from other sites. According to FTV's site, here are the following specs:
WMV Ultra HD 1440x1080 Resolution 8000kb/sec bitrate
WMV HD 720x480 Resolution 3000kb/sec bitrate
WMV 640x480 Resolution 700-2000kb/sec bitrate
Some videos are behind scenes of the photoshoots and you get to hear the lovely 3,2,1 and then the snap of the camera. However the cameraman does do a decent job of not talking too much, unless it's the interview video, he normally just lets the girls do what they want.
The videos are normally split up into 5-10 5-7 min secments. No option for full scene download.
The site could use a update in navigation. As of now you can either list by update or by model name in alphabetical order. There no way to search for a name or to find a model with a certain body type.
Some models are also not first time video girls, some can be seen on other pages, before their FTV shoots. However the models like that seem to be few.
In closing I really like FTV and it's probably one of my favorite sites. However there are changes that need to be done to break the low 90's number. They need to start putting the images up in their default resolution, instead just putting select images in a zip and slapping them up on the BigPics page. Add the user forum and drop the price. Right now $29.95 is flat out too high for any site that isn't a network site.
If they would do both of those and drop the price to $5-10 then I think it could easily be a mid to high 90's site.
In closing if you like public nudity or like real orgasms, then I'd recommend you give FTV a shot. |
|
12-30-08 04:58pm
Replies (4)
|
Rating
72
|
FTV Girls
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
12-10-08 04:23pm
|
Review
73
|
FTV Girls
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful selection of young models
- High quality pictures (1600px × 1064px latest)
- Over an hour with each model
- Very intimate videos – Real Orgasms
- Huge selection ( cant count)
- 64 HD videos ( incredible quality)
- Exhibitionism
- Girls are able to be themselves
- Crazy Insertions for those with fetish
- Appealing site design |
| Cons: |
-Full scene with every part combined would be nice
-Old stuff isn’t digitally enhanced, and quality lacks slightly
-The HD videos take forever to download
-No boy/girl sex
-Search features are limited to model
-no forum for interaction with any model
-updates are usually around once a week |
| Bottom Line: |
Ah FTV girls, one of my very first reviews. This site is still my number one site after all this time. You get real girls who send in their amateur pics and FTV pays them to get off and be natural. Obviously not all are amateur, but there are some girls who are only found on this site. Love the fact there is not to many fake boobs, or famous porn stars. There are not to many other sites where you get to see a girl truly orgasm and enjoy herself on tape. You even get close ups of the girls juices flowing. The videos are genuine and real as they get and the quality is extraordinary. Each girl’s personality really shines in each video, and you get to see every inch of the girl. Sometimes you get some kinky stuff like speculums, gigantic dildos, fisting, and pregnant woman(HOT). You can literally download all the HD videos from the site and make a DVD collection which is worth WAY more than the monthly asking price. The site is gigantic; it would take months to download everything on this site. If you never joined this site then you have seriously been missing out even if hardcore is your thing. This site is about enjoying the beauty and eroticism of woman at its best. I know some people say the material is repetitive but so is most hardcore sites material. If you’re looking for the kinky masturbation stuff, this is the the best site. I’m leaving my previous score of 94, because even though FTV improved so did some of the other similar sites. |
|
10-30-08 08:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
74
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
10-15-08 08:39am
Replies (5)
|
Rating
75
|
FTV Girls
(0)
94.0
|
No Review.
|
09-14-08 03:34pm
|
|
