| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
FTV Girls
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of very attractive models.
The new Super HD videos are crystal clear with
a size of 1440x1080 and a total bitrate of 8000 kbps.
Picture sets are zipped. |
| Cons: |
Older videos (even as recent as 2007 and 2006) are of mediocre quality. Just as an experiment I went to the models' list and downloaded two video segments each from the first two models that were listed with a 2000 bitrate, wmv. I also downloaded the same two segments in divx.
Divx was an unmitigated disaster, the wmv files were better but far from crisp and clear as one would expect from something shot as recently as one - two years ago. One video shot in 2004 and downloaded because I really liked the model hit the recycle bin within seconds it was so awful.
The segments are numbered in a most awkward way. Each you will download will be called 01dx (for DVX), 01w (WMV), 01HD (HD) and you will be forced to rename it. Even if a model has two separate sets, both are named the same.
There is no search engine.
Some pictures can be obtained zipped in super size but the choice of pictures is arbitrary!
The regular pictures themselves are only so-so in size and definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
There should be two scores: One for what FTV are offering NOW (for that I would give them a ninety even if the updates ARE slow) and one for the rest of their material which is really mediocre in my eyes. The girls are great and are doing some daring things in a natural way which I find appealing but what good is that if the picture is small and blurred as is so often the case with the older material.
September 16: I will not lower the original score because the site deserves it but the more I read the site's derogatory comments on some of the models' looks or performance, the angrier I got.
It is demeaning to them and uncalled for. Let us users make up our minds if someone's body needs "tone" (a comment in today's update) or if their actions weren't as enthusiastic as they could have been. This site will NOT be revisited by me. |
|
08-22-08 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
77
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Interaction with the Models
- Models are young and very fresh looking
- Public Nudity is very good in this sight. I usually don't care for it much. This feels real and the anticipation/trepidation of getting caught is evident, nervous laughter, etc.
- Ultra HD video is great! Runs well on my machine and looks fantastic.
- Huge Library - |
| Cons: |
- No Search Function
- Should have super sized photos for every set
- No Hardcore Boy/Girl Action |
| Bottom Line: |
This site provides what they promise! That is unusual in this industry. The videos have gotten tons better over the years. I was first a member in 2002 and still have the photosets and vids. It makes me laugh at what I though quality was.
I will be making my way to the older sets, I'm interested in seeing if FTV has updated any of the older content, now that the rendering process is much more advanced. The speed of data transfer alone allows so much more terms of quality.
I would rate this a quality site... off the charts if they added Hardcore. |
|
08-22-08 08:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
78
|
FTV Girls
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
exclusive content
great looking young women
a lot of hardcore masturbation
excellent quality for both pictures and videos |
| Cons: |
the price is a bit high
there is very little male female sexual contact
some of the scenes shot in public areas have a lot of noise in the background
all girls are shaved |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an exclusive site that deserves to be in a category by itself. The high quality coupled with the dedication to the praise and showing off of the female body is beyond compare.
If you can handle the somewhat expensive price, this is well-worth subscribing to. |
|
08-19-08 06:37pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
79
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hot, natural looking chicks
- Lots of public nudity (good if you like that)
- Lots of large dildos (this is not a softcore site!)
- High quality videos
- Frequent updates |
| Cons: |
None |
| Bottom Line: |
This is just one of the best porn sites out there. Hot chicks, great bodies, fun videos, tons of video, and not too prudish: these girls get very enthusiastic even though it's not hardcore (b/g). |
|
08-14-08 09:04am
Replies (3)
|
Review
80
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large amount of beautiful young women and high quality pictures and videos. High definition videos are available for newer content. |
| Cons: |
Most videos are in segments. This can be annoying for downloading a complete scene. The site layout could be a little better; it is pretty much a simple list of latest updates, and then a large (really big) index of each woman. |
| Bottom Line: |
FTV is a great website featuring a wide array of women doing their thing to get off. Both the solo and girl-girl photos/videos are in excellent quality. Lastly, some well known porn stars are on here under different names (like Tiffany Taylor is called Celine here). |
|
05-30-08 02:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
81
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
05-13-08 08:17pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
82
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
# this site spoils video lovers
# offers 1440 X 1080 Ultra HD video; 8000 bper second
# offers 720 x 480 HD video
# every update from now on will include HD, and Ultra HD video
# Great looking models- usually students who send in sample photos and live in Phoenix.
# straightforward, magazine style layout
# the hd feeds are great; show great detail, def an upgrade over regular wmv watching that models booty jiggle in her skirt in Ultra HD is addicting.
# 30-45 minutes of vid comes with each shoot setting; comprises about 2 + hours of video per model; with some much more than that.
# photo shoots are hi quality; around 4 shoots/4 different settings 40- 60 pics per. Fewer, well chosen pics: almost every pic is background material
# Offers super sized pics 2000x 3000 format
# FTV girls Co. lavishes these girls; they are shot in hotels; inside lavish homes, taken away in expensive cars making hi class shoot settings.
# offers an extensive DVDs: each 1.5 to 2 hours long |
| Cons: |
# HD vids are only a recent addition- 24 models have updates that include the HD- the rest are
#the ultra HD vid feeds will take five- 7 minutes to load for like a six minute segment DSL- don't know about other connections
# not a site for those with dial up connections: downloads can take hours. as this is not a site where you would join just for the pics
# The updates come on schedule; but your not going to get an update a day- about one model every couple of weeks. |
| Bottom Line: |
Ftv Girls are for vid lovers who have the hi speed connection to be able to enjoy this site.
Mostly college age students are dared to expose themselves in a public setting. Usually in a place- like a mall parking lot, or city park when no one is there. Its almost a requirement for a photo shoot; and some of them are nervous about it; some shoots are even interrupted by security; but some of the models end up loving it. One model Kara, who at first was too shy to do it, surprises as she strips down naked in a parking lot as she walks to the photgraphers car.. and that one was in offered in HD. Its fun to see some of these girls turn from shy girl to exhibitionist; passing the point of no return; almost becoming addicted to the thrill of it themselves.
There's booty jiggling, upskirts, dressing room shots where they try on clothes (high end lingerie and dresses), interviews, poolside vids, panty stuffing in their vagina, and tons of masterbation.
# each model comes with around three seperate shoot settings: usually one shoot where they take clothes off in a public setting; one where they primp- dress in a bathroom try on different clothes and lingerie; and a hardcore shoot where they masterbate with or without a dildo.
The other plus with a vid site is that I can do other things while the HD vids download; You can get other things done while these vids are downloading.
Ive joined Ftv Girls wtihout regret 5 times. Though the first time I had dial up. |
|
04-14-08 09:31am
Replies (4)
|
Review
83
|
FTV Girls
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Tons of content, all archived
+ Hot young models, most are unknowns
+ Some good videos, with masturbation, anal, toys, including some in HD
+ Pretty easy and simple navigation
+ Selected photos are available in gigantic sizes (2000 x 3000!) |
| Cons: |
- Normal photos could be a lot bigger and clearer
- Content can get repitive and boring, sometimes pretty softcore, even for a girl-only site
- Downloads could be faster
- Too much clothed and public nudity scenes
- Not every model has videos
- Better content descriptions needed for the model listings (it's not clear whether something is in a video or photo) |
| Bottom Line: |
First off, this is a huge site - lots of exclusive content, available to all users. Unfortunately, all this content was not created equal. A model could be doing some big insertions in a scene, but half the photos will just be of her undressing, or doing some stupid public nudity, and this gets frustrating very fast. The vast majority of these women are very attractive; it just takes too long to see them nude. The photos themselves are good, but really way too small (1100 x 800 max). There are huge photos available in a big pics section, but they are only available in zip packs, so you have to DL a whole scene (some 100mb+, a slow DL on this site) just to get a few good ones.
This site gets high marks for the sheer amount of content available, the beauty of its models, and its videos, but they seem to fail to reach the full potential of it all by not offering bigger size normal pics and more nudity (it is a porn site after all). Fortunately, navigating and finding the goods is quick and easy, though they are not always clear what is what on the model listing pages (whether something is in a video or photo), and some stuff I stumbled upon by accident, but it's not mentioned (a few pissing photos, for example). Still, this is not a hardcore site, so if you looking for rough hard content with guys, then this isn’t the place. |
|
04-01-08 12:35pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
84
|
FTV Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of content.
Great video options and quality.
Very attractive models.
Good price.
Webmaster always responds to e-mails.
Consistent updates.
Great solo masturbation content.
Good bit of fisting and large toy use.
Model comments on some scenes are interesting.
Some lesbian material.
Many models aren't seen all over the place.
Shoot locations are gorgeous. |
| Cons: |
No hardcore for the hardcore fan.
Older shoots do not have the same quality of video.
Some older shoots don't even have video.
Occasionally the models aren't very attractive, but it's rare for this. |
| Bottom Line: |
Easily one of the best sites out there. The amount of content is staggering since this site has been up and running for a long long time now. Almost all of the models are attractive, although lately there have been a few unattractive ones. Still, it's 95% cute-hot girls to 5% not so much, which is a damn good ratio.
The content itself hasn't changed a bit over the years, except now there seems to be a focus on public nudity more than there used to be. Still, there are usually at least 1-2 extreme shoots per month, which consists of large toy use, weird insertions, or fisting. Many of these girls are damn hot too that do this stuff. If it's not extreme, it's usually at least some masturbation.
Another topic worth noting is the fact that the webmaster is very responsive to e-mails. That is a big thing with me, and there are only a few other sites I've been a member of where I got consistent responses to suggestions and feedback. I actually brought Alicia Angel to Rob's attention and he shot her. Pretty cool. I will say that in my years of communication with Rob, he can be brusque at times, but overall he's a cool guy.
Also worth noting is the fact that most of the models on his site aren't porn models you see all over the place. A few are, but maybe only 20-30%. That's refreshing since it gets tiring seeing the same women over and over on the web. |
|
03-01-08 01:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
85
|
FTV Girls
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
02-20-08 04:21am
|
Rating
86
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-09-08 08:50pm
|
Review
87
|
FTV Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*A ton of content
*Lots of attractive women
*A lot of videos usually following a pattern of themes (primary focus of the site)
*Thumbnail images (vid-cap) at regular intervals to preview the clips. (can be enlarged to full resolution)
*Photo sets with every update - professional quality (natural lighting) - this isn't studio style stuff, though.
*Female masturbation to usually real orgasms.
*Some bizarre insertions (if you're into that) - extra large toys, champagne bottles, baseball bats, etc.
*Sets offer plenty of material in usually a variety of locations (2-3 locations per set).
*Public masturbation and nudity - sometimes high risk locations (they do get caught and thrown out sometimes)
*Variety of video resolutions (real High Definition started in December)
*Many of the models are known and popular porn stars or ladies who have since become popular porn stars.
*There is a section devoted to Girl-Girl shoots (best part of the site) |
| Cons: |
*Mostly solo content.
*Not every model shoots video.
*Not every model goes into extra-curricular activities (masturbation public or private, public nudity, etc)
*Definitely on the pricey side.
*Can get repetitive.
*No hardcore at all.
*File names for videos are terrible. (1a, 2a, 3a - requires more effort when saving since you have to rename them or create individual folders for each model & shoot)
*Since the photo shoots aren't studio style - the quality of the shots really depends on the skill of the photographer and how lucky they get with the lighting. Pretty much a best effort given the situation and location.
*Mega-size section for photo sets are almost all just a zip file so you have to commit to the entire download.
*Mega-size photo sets are completely untouched - these are jpgs of exactly what comes out of the camera's memory card - so it's not exactly like the ones in the preview. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a fantastic video site that features very attractive women doing as much extreme solo subject matter as the videographer can get them to do. So it can range from simple nudity & interviews to masturbation, fisting, extreme insertions, girl/girl action and fetish material. There is no hardcore action or boy/girl, but I never missed it. Usually things are very personal/intimate - more so than any other site I've found.
There is a general theme to the majority of the sets. The videographer definitely has favorite places (both public and in the "FTV House") to do shoots, but he tries to mix things up as much as possible to try to keep things fresh. And for all of the really popular models, he takes them to Hawaii.
The site is organized very well. Everything is accessible from the main page and the entire catalog is split into 3 sections of the alphabet except for the girl-girl stuff which is in its own section.
There is a system set up with descriptions so you can see what might be worth your time and what might not. They identify photo-only shoots and use a color coding system to identify standard masturbation shoots (yellow) and extreme shoots (red).
I signed up for 3 months and I needed it. Someone with a higher speed connection could likely leech everything in a month, though, but there is a daily cap of 25GB*(littlejoe). I wouldn't stay subscribed year-round, though. Maybe once a year for me to get the updates, but it's definitely worth resubscribing. |
|
01-26-08 01:32am
Replies (7)
|
Review
88
|
FTV Girls
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Great fun girl they work with who are up for a laugh
Now HD vids so thats always a plus.
Huge archive of babes now as been going a good few years.
Lots of sexy insertions and pussies being stretched to their max, which is different
Nice public nude stuff which I really enjoyed and worth the price alone to see the girls kissing and feeling each other up outside in public areas
87 but thats mainly cause of the great lesbian stuff even though it is too and far between here which is a great shame, I'll probs join every two years just to get the new lesbian stuff |
| Cons: |
Too much solo stuff for my liking
Some vids are of photoshoots which is totally dull
Hardcore doesn't happen here
Needs more lesbian
Quality of the vids isn't the best
Files named the same which is very annoying indeed |
| Bottom Line: |
Its a great site and quite unique in lots of ways, I enjoy things a little out of the norm porn bracket and this site had great insertions, excellent lesbian material with some vids making my favs of all time. Milk play on one vid which was weird but interesting.
I adore public nudity and girls flashing their pussies in naughty no underwear scenes, great indeed, love the kissing scenes in public too. nice touch.
Lots of the scenes are fresh of the top of the models head and you never know were its going, some are disapointing in the end, others are like wow, the naughty babe.
All is downloadable and yeah some of the older stuff not the best of quality, I think it would be good to re edit them like sapphic erotica did but that could take forever as u can guess, still the the quality is improved which is the main thing.
All the solo stuff for me is kind of boring, really wished they would do more lesbian scenes as they do it so well and could be one of the leaders if they got more of the girls to pair up, theres loasds of models who have done lesbian stuff on other sites so its not like they aren't willing.
For the lesbian and some of the fetish stuff off the wall scenes I really liked but its mainly solo stuff, if thats your thing you'll be in your element, some stunning girls. Solo masturbation though bores me and always has.
Overall its got stuff to warrant a membership here for most porn seekers apart from the hardcore crew, none of that here.
I'm giving 87 |
|
01-20-08 01:51am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
89
|
FTV Girls
(0)
99.0
|
No Review.
|
01-13-08 01:20pm
|
Review
90
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Real HD videos (Only started in december)
+ Standard video is Good Quality
+ Lots of images for video previews
+ Massive amounts of both Video and Images
+ Great scenes with pulic scenes also
+ Interveiws
+ Download Speed around (600k)
+ Girl Cum (with tasting)
+ Mainly Above average girls
+ Preview Image before Video starts
+ Video decription
+ the camera man doesnt get in camera veiw only talks |
| Cons: |
- No search engine
- Download limit 15g per day (Increased from 5Gig)
- Model names arnt always correct and sometimes made up
- Navigation needs improvments
- No Niches to search from
- Few lesbian scenes
- not enuf updates (every 5 days i think but they are big updates)
- File names are really anoying and are all the same. (see 1a.) |
| Bottom Line: |
One Year Member
This is my fav site and would remended it to anyone.
The some of the girls are totaly amazing and unscripted scenes (as far as i can tell)
They started doing HD videos (which are hd and dont just clame to be)
1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)
Improvements: I like the layout but it needs a revamp and it badly needs a niche search engine.
Make the split videos avlible into one complete video.
1a. The file names are totaly anoying and all the videos names have only numbers e.g. 1w.wmv this has to be the most anoying thing in the world as you have to rename the files or you will forget which video is which model. (This is a massive flaw in the site and should be addressed right away)
All My reviews are non profit and 100% honest. |
|
12-26-07 06:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
91
|
FTV Girls
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Nice Magazine Covers
+ Nice Web Design
+ Have to cancel to get lower membership price offer of $19,95 USD
+ Set of large pictures given every 4-6 months
+ Just started HD video |
| Cons: |
- No Daily Updates – up to a week for single model update
- Blurry and porly lit pictures
- Girls seem forced into uncomfortable situations and not very happy.
- Only one size small pictures offered weekly
- No customer service. Tried to cancel and charged again. No email back
- Not so many pretty models |
| Bottom Line: |
I originally join site because of TheBestPorn review but was very sad. TBP review not honest about site. Ftv updates every 6-7 days which makes it not worth money. Only single model updates so when model not pretty you have to wait 1 more week and wish a pretty girl is added. To many bigger sites for money update daily like met-art, ronharris, alscans, and 1by-day with higher quality pictures and better video. Ftv trys to shoot glamore but Met-art is very much better quality and value. Site not first time video because always same models do video for Ronharris and other sites many months before ftv.
Many pictures are blurry/graney that is why pictures are only given in one small size for download. Every 4-6 month site releases a set of supersize pictures hand selected to find no blurry pictures. They should give all picture sizes in each weekly update. Site has nice magazine covers to get peoples money. Almost no Hi-Def video, only few models. Rest of site is low def video.
Same models shot at other sites look much better. I collect pretty models from many sites and ftv pictures and video are never as good. In videos man filming makes models uncomfortable and makes me sad for them. This is true review that so many more better sites for money with daily updates. Site does have some pretty girls but not enough. Members site layout is very good. Site was better 3 years before but now compatition much better then Ftv. |
|
12-18-07 08:11am
Replies (7)
|
Comment
92
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
12-16-07 10:06am
Replies (12)
|
Comment
93
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
12-04-07 01:17am
Replies (7)
|
Review
94
|
FTV Girls
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Lots of content
+ Great looking girls
+ Nice reality - they look like they are having fun
+ Good video quality (especially later videos)
+ Nice website design in members area
+ 248+ GB of movies (as of June 2007) |
| Cons: |
- After a while can get a little repetitive
- Very little girl/girl |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I like this site although I think it is a little repetitive. As of June 2007 they had over 5000 movies. Each model has lots of individual movies, which I would prefer to be available in one download.
I've been a member of this site twice (once in May/June) the previous time was 20 months earlier.
The site is different to a lot of others out there which is definitely a plus point. The interviews and scenes are very believable.
If they offered full HD movies and had more girl/girl scenes this would make it a really great site. |
|
11-15-07 12:44am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
95
|
FTV Girls
(0)
96.0
|
No Review.
|
10-02-07 07:29pm
|
Comment
96
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
10-02-07 07:27pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
97
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
10-02-07 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
FTV Girls
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A Lot Of Material
- Hi Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Many Videos
- Decent DL Speed |
| Cons: |
- Much Of The Material Is Somewhat Boring
- NO Hardcore
- Infrequent Updating |
| Bottom Line: |
After thumbing through their extensive preview, I was anxious to see the site. I was somewhat disappointed. It's a very attractive site, and easy to navigate. It does have an awful lot of material, photos and videos. But, something is missing. It's not exciting. A bit bland. Some of the sets seem to be nudity optional! Others, the old statue posing. There is no hardcore. That would be fine if the material was highly erotic, but most of it is not. I guess if you never saw a girl nude before, it would be. But for jaded porn surfers, nah! It's not that there isn't good material here, there is, but you have to search for it. The photos are hi-res, at the lower end of the scale (1200px), and zipped for convenience. They do have a page of larger sized photos (2000x3000), but just 1 page.The videos are offered in wmv (640x480), and divx (360x240). Being First Time Videos, the girls are basically presented as the archetypal "girl next door". I don't know about your neighborhood, but the girls nowadays are a little more wild than those presented here! |
|
09-30-07 04:08am
Replies (9)
|
Comment
99
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
09-15-07 07:24pm
Replies (7)
|
Comment
100
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
09-15-07 02:59pm
Replies (1)
|
|
