Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.

Webmaster : XArt (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (4)         Other:   Site Feedback (368)   |   Replies Received (1) Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. Shown : 76-81 of 81 Page : Page 1 2 3 4    < Previous Page Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Comment 76 X-Art (0) Just curious Is all the material from their old site Beauty is Divine on this site as well, or just some of it? Looking at the preview it seems as though perhaps not... 12-05-10  12:04am Replies (4) Comment 77 X-Art (0) Teen glamor site with hardcore edge. This site has been around for a number of years. It used to be called "Beauty Is Divine". At that time it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. There were no videos that I remember. Most of the models were really stunning. The problem was that you only had a small number of photosets, and each photoset had a small number of photos. Then the name of the site changed a few years ago to "X-art". They started adding videos to the site. The videos over the last couple of years or so are becoming hardcore. The videos have a short runtime, 10 minutes or less. The videos are very high quality (in lighting, focus, high definition, etc.). The photosets are also becoming not just softcore, but hardcore as well. I think the photography of the photos is as good as any major photo site, but some PU members have commented they thought the photography at this site was not excellent. This site is not a mega-site in the amount of photosets and videos. But almost all the models are extremely attractive. And the videos and photosets are extremely high quality. There are definitely more photosets than videos at this site, but that is because of the site history, when the site was strictly photosets. The current updates at the site include both photosets and videos. The preview pages show you nice-sized thumbnails of many of the covers for the site photosets and videos. The preview could be improved by including sample photos, and by a few sample 1-minute videos, so you could get a clear idea of the quality of the photos and videos. You will probably wish each photoset had more photos, because the models are mainly lovely, and you want to see more of them. And the videos, at less than 10 minutes each, seem very short. You will almost certainly wish the videos were longer. If you like the type of photography at this site, I think the site is well worth at least a 1 month membership. I'm thinking of taking this comment, and turning it into a site review, because it sure as hell looks like it could have been written as a site review. Copyright Nov. 16, 2010, by lk2fireone, in case I do write a review of this site, and the material in this reply is used as the basis for a site review. 11-16-10  05:10pm Replies (1) Comment 78 X-Art (0) Not disappointed Thanks to the comments from the kind members here, I had a good idea of what to expect from this site. It's worth noting, however, that the updates appear to be coming every 2-3 days pretty steadily these days as opposed the every 3-4 days previously. I like the content very much, and I don't regret joining. I'm a big fan of slender models doing girl/girl and solo and good photography, so this site seemed ideal for me. The content is a lot like MET-Art's, but the models are allowed to go where we always wished MET would let their models go and look great doing it. I can't think of any site that has better looking models *and* makes its models look better, MET included, cept perhaps Explicite-Art. As other reviewers have stated, both the videos and the photo sets are short, and it's hard to tell why. The shoots take a long time to set up, and the models seem into it, and yet things are wrapped up awfully quickly, with a few exceptions. It often seems like such a gratuitous waste, and that may be the only negative I've found. You're kind of left thinking that there's a longer, less chopped-up version that's being sold elsewhere. While I can't recommend a long-term commitment at this point, it's certainly worth a month's sub, to me anyway. I reckon that I got my 20 bucks worth, and will keep an eye on it to see if it might be worth a return visit later on. If ever they begain daily updates and/or longer videos *of the same quality* then I'd consider a long-term commitment. 06-06-10  06:56am Replies (2) Comment 79 X-Art (0) Confused This looks ok (great models) at the preview - but certainly NOT sure about the content - NOT from brummies newly review, anyway... TBP states no videos, except streaming behind the scenes - though the preview say 'videos'. Even read webmasters earlier reply to Drooler - but I'm not more clear here. Like lk2fireone this user would be gratefull for some usefull info/update - if anyone? 02-05-10  07:49am Replies (4) Comment 80 X-Art (0) Site worth joining? This site has some absolutely yummy models. But as Drooler noted in a comment on July 29, 2009, in spite of the high-quality photos, the quantity of pix seems small. Any recent members have an opinion on whether the site is worth joining for a month? Like I said, some of the models are fucking gorgeous. 01-30-10  10:13am Replies (0) Comment 81 X-Art (0) Wasn't Very Impressed I recently rejoined this site (had joined once before when it was called "Beauty is Divine"). It was better, yet by no great measure in terms of the content. The photo sizes are larger, but the galleries are usually small and the updates are infrequent. And the site navigation has idiosyncrasies that took some getting used to. Really, it's pretty much like it was before: If you appreciate artistic nude photography, you might like it. I gave it a second chance as an erotic photo site and, though there were a small number of things I enjoyed, it didn't satisfy me very much overall. I'd wait several days for an update; one would finally come; I'd view it and find it lacking. That's how I remember this site. It would be a mistake for this user to rejoin a third time in the future. 07-29-09  04:52pm Replies (2) Shown : 76-81 of 81 Page : Page 1 2 3 4    < Previous Page Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.05 seconds.