Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Old content (2015 and before) is some of the best porn ever created
Cons:
-Current crop of models are all Eastern European.
-No tags or advanced search/filter options
-Updates were starting to slow before the pandemic but really slowed down during 2020, with no new updates for almost one whole year as of August 2022
Bottom Line:
When it was founded, X-Art was hands-down one of the best porn sites on the internet. The couples were really into it, because oftentimes they were actual couples. The videos were well-produced and cinematic. In fact, they were so 'artistic' that they often wouldn't even show the man cumming inside the woman.
The current site is absolutely nothing like this. The videos are indistinguishable from mainstream, over-produced porn. The sex is mechanical and emotionless, and the creampies are often obviously fakes. The actual quality in performance, lighting, camerawork, etc., was way better *ten years ago* than the current videos being put out. This can only be explained by massive cuts in production budget and a lack of passion both behind and in front of the camera.
The site used to have a wide array of models to choose from. As of the last 7 or 8 years, however, they have been hiring mostly barely-legal Eastern Europeans with no tits. They're probably paid a fraction of what a US model would be paid and I bet STI testing regulations are way looser. For some reason they also have not been crediting models lately, which seems suspicious.
Even when this site was new, navigation has always been primitive, with a very rudimentary search function, no tags, and no filtering besides choosing solo, couples, or group sex.
They appear to have been deleting negative comments on videos, which is the lowest sign of desperation.
It's easy to blame the pandemic for the decline of this site but the quality has been decreasing since the middle of last decade, and the updates were decreasing in quantity long before anyone had heard of COVID.
It's sad to see a site that was so great and unique die such a slow death.
Looking at the public preview pages, it seems the update rate really slowed in 2021.
The last updates appear to be in September 2021.
This was once a great site: lovely models, great videos and photosets.
Check out the update rate before joining.
Hate to see people wasting their money.
But the back catalog is worth a short term join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Huge archive
-Variety of scenes (solo, gg, bg, threesomes) although nothing hardcore or extreme
-Amazing models, some all-time favorites (Little Caprice, Nancy A., Eufrat, Blue Angel...)
-Nice photography, settings, direction...
-Stream + download option
-Several download options (HD/SD, MOV/MP4, and 4K in more recent scenes
-Great download speed and no download limit
Cons:
-Navigation options are scarce
-Site can be slow to react sometimes
-Updates are not very regular these days (between one and four per month this year, approximately)
-Photo sets don't seem to be very large (although I am not really a photo fan, so I don't really care that much)
-Can be pricey if you don't get a discount (and BEWARE of pre-selected cross-sells!)
Bottom Line:
This site is just one all-time classic. It goes back over a decade, and it features some of the most beautiful models that have ever worked in this business, and some of my all-time favorite girls: Little Caprice, Angelica, Eufrat, Blue Angel... Many of them are now retired or have their own websites and onlyfans, so there's no new material with them on the site, but the archive is so huge, that you probably won't mind.
In fact, updates seem to be a bit irregular these days, I don't know if this has to do with the pandemic situation, because last year the update rhythm seemed to be much higher: one update one month, up to four on the next one... In any case, as I also mentioned, their archive is so huge, and with such beautiful girls, that you will have plenty of material to watch before you have to wait for new updates... I guess this only becomes a problem after a couple of months of membership, when you have really "burned" the site archive...
And also, even the oldest content looks quite good. Photography is great, lighting is great, locations are gorgeous, and the quality is in general more than acceptable. (In other sites, older scenes seem grainy and old-fashioned).
For each scene (or for most of them in any case) there is a photo set and a video. I am not a photo fan so I won't comment anything about that. As for the videos, you can watch them online or download them, in several different qualities and formats, with a great download speed and no download limit (and believe me, I have downloaded A LOT of their content in these past weeks).
Of course, this site won't do much for those looking for hardcore or extreme content, since its style, even in the boy-girl scenes, is quite mellow: you could call it couple-porn, if you know what I mean. And also, as many of the girls are Eastern-European, there is no talking on the videos, and not really much context to the sex (excuse me, lovemaking), which can get a bit boring to be honest.
But the only major flaw of this site is... the site. Navigations options are really scarce: Updates, videos, models and favorites; and under categories: videos, photos, and a very few related with content (Male-Female, Group Sex, Backdoor Loving, etc.). A more detailed category system would make a huge different for me. For example, I love foot-fetish focused scenes, and although I know X-Art is not in that niche, I would like to know if any of their videos feature foot worship, footjobs, lesbian foot fucking... And the same with massages, bondage, etc. The only way to find these specifics is by browsing the list of videos and trying your luck. Which is really a shame...
Apart from that, download speeds are great, as I mentioned, but the navigation of the site seems a little slow sometimes, for example when you click on "Download" or "Add to favorites". Nothing really troubling, just slightly annoying.
(I will add just another small and sort of funnny "glitch": in their site, models just don't age, they are in an eternal Peter-Pan-esque youth. Little Caprice, who is by now over 30 -and still smoking hot- appears as "22" in the X-Art site, because that was probably the age she had when she started).
All in all, I would highly recommend this site, particularly if you get a discount coupon or offer, since their normal prices are a bit pricey (and they come with some also very expensive pre-selected cross-sells, so be very careful of what you sign up to).
X-Art and SuperHot seem to be marketed as two sites for one.
$99.95/6 months subscription to both sites, recurring every 6 months.
There's probably a way to subscribe to X-Art by itself.
There's also a simpler way to subscribe to SuperHot by itself, for $49.95/year.
And if you are a creator, model, or photographer, you can get a free account to SuperHot, and get paid for your content, mesages, contests, etc.
Exactly what SuperHot is, I'm not sure.
And the public preview page shows almost nothing.
But $99.95/6 months for X-Art, even if it comes with the unknown SuperHot, seems very expensive.
I'm wondering how many subscribers are paying those prices, especially since the updates for X-Art seem to be very slow.
Maybe one new update per week, or less. X-Art had a lot of gorgeous models in the past, and the videos and photosets were high quality glamour, but they seem to have priced themself way too high to join.
The Best Porn states there is a new review of X-Art "completed on May 22, 2020 and will be released in less than a week."
It's now June 02, 2020, and the last review posted was released Oct 2, 2019.
October to May is about 7 months, so the latest posted review is only 7 months old.
I'm surprised they did a re-review so soon, even if they have not released it yet.
RabbitsReviews shows a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.
But the link connects to the X-Art site, and when you hit the join page link, it shows a join price of $99.95/6 months for a sub to X-Art and SuperHot, recurring at $99.95/6 months, and a $40/month sub to X-Art and SuperHot.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge content
Wonderful Photo Galleries
Enough reading material about videos and models
Professional shots
Cons:
Site navigation and video player is not the best.
Tagging and search is not good.
Bottom Line:
x-art is one of the best amateur porn sites I like. It has a big archive. Videos are shot professionally and do not have lighting or other problems some other sites have. Their video player is not the best I have seen, but you can download the videos easily, and also automatically at multiple resolutions. Also, they have very nice photo galleries to download.
Site navigation of x-art is not the best you will find. Updates, Videos, Models, and Behind the Scenes are the main sections. You can see their archives easily. Also, you can comment on videos and models . They have enough models. Even though some models have only one shoot, some have several. You can find all kinds of amateur videos on the site, from solo shoots to group, they have enough selections to satisfy you.
I like the good lighting and different locations on their videos. There are so many outdoor shoots and if that is what you like in an amateur site, you will not be disappointed. Since they have a big archive, you will find more than enough close shots and group shots also.
If you like reading about the models and shoots, they have a nice blog.
Beauty of x-art ladies will definitely satisfy you. They are mostly young actresses as you would expect from an amateur site. The shootings are professional, and the videos are amateur. That is what I definitely value in amateur site, beautifully shot amateur videos. However, their best quality must be their wonderful photo galleries, you will get lost in them if you are into photos as much as I am.
The site could have been designed in a better way. Even though, they have 4k videos on the site, navigating through the site and searching for videos can be a problem sometimes.
Actors and actresses do their work better on some other sites I have been.
They have an option to subscribe for 2 years non-recurring, which is their best value, and they definitely have more than enough content to be a member for 2 years.
When you click on the PU link to X-Art, and then click on the join link, the price you see is:
$99.95/6 months, recurring.
This is for a membership to X-Art and SUPERHOT.
I'm not sure what SUPERHOT is.
Is it a new porn site, or what?
Anyway, the price used to be around $100/year recurring for X-Art.
If they doubled the price, it seems very high to me, and I would not be joining any time soon.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ultra hot girls. It’s honestly hard to think of any sites with more beautiful performers (within this pro/mainstream, Eastern European aesthetic)
- There’s a variety of scene styles: solo, lesbian, boy/girl, threesomes, group sex. Within this variety there’s always a sensual, even ‘loving’ vibe between the performers. It’s the kind of content I can imagine watching with a lover.
- Production values are very high for both videos and the photosets
- Updates are regular and frequent – the collection is pretty huge thanks to this
- The more recent videos are available in 4K resolution, and basically all videos can be streamed from 360p to at least 1080p.
- Downloads are fast, streaming is also a smooth experience
Cons:
- The site has a visual niche for its performers and it sticks to it quite strictly. It’s a fantastic niche, but some more visual variety would be nice.
- Browsing the collection can be frustrating. The search engine is surprisingly basic and there’s no real option to browse by categories (more on this below).
- I’m sometimes getting an annoying banner across the top of the page that is prompting an upgrade. Disappointing to have something like this when it’s not the cheapest site around…
Bottom Line:
X-Art has been going since about 2010, and over that time they’ve built up a large collection of videos and accompanying photosets. It’s hard/impossible to count, but exotics4me’s review suggests that they have around 1000 videos – that seems like a conservative guess to me. Basically, there’s enough porn here to keep you busy for a long time, so it’s good value in that sense.
The specialty here is in extremely hot, model-like girls, usually from Eastern Europe but with some Americans, too. The look is slim, refined and super feminine. It’s rare to see tattoos or obviously fake breasts, and I would say the makeup is fairly ‘everyday’ and tasteful. ‘Glamcore’ is for sure the right term to use for X-Art.
Keeping with this theme, the scenes are shot in luxurious locations (indoors and outdoors), with some very slick lighting and camerawork. I noticed that some scenes are more cinematic than others, but as a rule the visual production is refined and matches the exclusive kind of beauty that the girls have.
Videos come with a text describing the action and the situation, but within the videos themselves there is rarely anything like a story. In this case I’m glad there’s no needless distraction. Instead, they usually start with some playful and flirtatious posing and stripping, where the details of the girl’s exquisite bodies are revealed. The fucking can be solo, lesbian, as couples or in groups, but it’s practically always sensitive and intimate, like you’re watching a (professional) boyfriend and girlfriend. There are lots of closeups of blowjobs and cocks sliding into the girls, etc. to go along with the wider shots. The effect really emphasizes things like skin texture, wetness, and softness, creating a super sensual atmosphere.
This is a strong point for me – the girls have that kind of beauty where rough treatment would feel wrong or a waste. Some people will wish for rougher action, but I appreciate being able to (virtually) luxuriate in the beauty and touch of these girls. Sometimes I might be in the mood for something more amateur, but that’s just not what X-Art is about so I would go elsewhere for this. X-Art have focused on glamorous girls and sensual fucking, and I think this focus is why the quality is so high. It means there’s not much diversity in the girls or the way they perform, but you don’t really go to McDonald’s for Chinese food…
If X-Art has a weak point, it has to be the website itself. The search function is really weak – it seems to only search video/photoset names, and performer names or something. So if you search for something like ‘neighbor’ or ‘cumshot’ you won’t find much, if anything. This could be because there is also no good system for tagging videos. Instead, I find myself sometimes searching by model (there is a ‘Models’ page) or simply browsing the entire collection by rating or upload date. I can always find something good, but it’s a bit disappointing that it’s this hard to search through the collection – especially since it’s so large.
This is a real annoyance, but it doesn’t overshadow the quality of the videos and photos for me. You always know what you’re going to get on X-Art, and it’s going to be top-level, glamorous beauties fucking sensually and shot professionally. If you can afford the rather high membership price and you’re interested in the niche like I am, I think it’s worth at least a short membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's top artsy but hardcore sites.
- The quality throughout is very high.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of my max) but the site sometimes is a bit slow to load. It's not my internet and my computer is considered a still viable computer in video gaming. I'll go a little more into in the BL.
- The models. Some of the prettiest models in the world and they use high production values.
- Update schedule isn't consistent but it works out to 3-4 updates a week.
- CCBill as the biller, there was a cross-sale and it was checked, it's to their other site. Kind of hard to see because their signup page is black.
- If you've ever liked their content, you probably still will. I think they're one of the most consistent sites.
- While it has nearly 1,000 videos, I join it for for the picture sets. They have some of the best picture sets I've ever seen.
- It's one of the few standalone sites these days that gives you your money's worth and more.
Cons:
- My score reflects the 5 point automatic drop. I hate this site's navigation. It annoys the hell out of me. The videos navigation is very good. The model's list is very good. The updates, which is the only way to find the photo sets, is one long page of scrolling. I expected a change on that but it hasn't happened.
- I'm trying not to use the word "heartcore" because I for some reason really like this site but don't typically like heartcore. But that is very much a con for some. It's kind of mushy.
Bottom Line:
X-Art to me is a site you could join for a year and wouldn't get tired of the content, if you like the content. And, it might take a year to get to the bottom of the updates page! Why isn't that fixed? If nothing else, easy fix here, stick a photos "tab" up there with "videos" and have 30-40 photo sets per page. I think I broke my my mouse's scrolling wheel on this site. I have no idea how much content there is overall because I get to 2013 and stop scrolling but open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages. I not only know roughly how many videos but I can jump from page to page too. I was going to just do a 5 point deduction, but I believe an 8 point deduction is more fitting.
That wouldn't be a problem but I come for the photo sets. That's really my only legit complaint. I thought I had got around it. There's a drop-down menu that has "photos" in it. But all that did was put all the photo sets on the long, scrolling page!
If you've not been to X-Art before, it fits that "female-friendly" genre of porn. I hope I'm not being sexist by saying that. I know women who love the most hardcore porn on the internet. So, I'll say, in general, this is a more "realistic", mushy, kind of lovey style of porn. They still get very hardcore at times but it's done tastefully. That was the hardest paragraph I've ever typed in a review!
As I've gotten older, I have started liking the teen-style models but they're still not my favorites. And most of the models here fit the teen-type, slender, very pretty, if there are tattoos you don't see them often and implants are either a no-no or very rare. It's also not just male/female. They have quite a bit of lesbian too and some solo too.
I don't know if this is a negative but I like their pictures better than the videos. It's most-likely me. I haven't been joining or downloading much what I call "regular porn videos". I have downloaded 38 (exact count) so far at X-Art, so it's not that the videos are bad. Their picture sets have my favorite thing in porn photos, the models going from (usually)dressed fully to fully nude and they do enough of the in-between dressed and nude photos in their sets. They excel at it. The newest photo update wasn't one of my favorites. It's titled "Sex with Gymnasts". It's a lesbian set. There's nothing in the photos to make me think they're gymnasts. I was excited to download and view it. There's no stretching or upskirt splits. And they're nearly nude at the beginning! I hear gymnasts and I think tight shorts or tight leggings. But that's rare for them.
Videos are 965 in count, since January 2016, they've had the 4K option on the videos. It is a little sporadic back when they first started it but they're offering it on all of the newer videos. This shows the quality, at least to me, over those 965 videos, 961 have 1080p option. They also have 720p, 540p and 480p. The pictures are all downloadable and are 4000 long end in the "large" download file.
I even think I understand why I like their photos so much, the lighting is very natural. So you don't get the real warm colors like some sites use but you also do get crisp colors and I would even say the colors are more of a cool color. That's become more important as I've got older and my eyes don't especially like bright, vivid colors.
I also know why the site loads so slowly. It's that long scrolling page. Their "thumbnails" for each set are 350x400 resolution and I would estimate there's over 2,000 of those on that page.
I do like their solo videos. They have some with big toys and some with little toys and the models, as said, are very pretty.
As for the main male/female content: I've at least got over the feeling that it's silly to try and project love in a porn video but it's not just that. It's the mushy part that I don't do well with. I don't even do that mushy stuff in my life. They're up there making love. And I think that's where it loses me because I like the teasing and the playfulness and then they should go at it like jackrabbits. They never seem to respond to the teasing and playfulness like they've been teased. It's still not a big negative. The content is popular with some people and I'm okay with that.
The site is still a top site that's worth joining at least once. Can't complain at all about the technical quality or what looks like someone spends some time actually setting the scenes up. Just don't expect any double ass to mouth or even hair-pulling. Maybe that's why I like the solo videos better? Some of those solo ones look like they're trying to tear their insides out.
With solo content becoming more rare and focus on photos becoming even rarer, those who like those should definitely check this site out. And their lesbian content is on par with a typical lesbian scene. If they would fix that scrolling page so I could see all the photo sets, I would jump it up to 96-98 but that page will annoy some people. So, I'm going with a 90.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls here are all beautiful, mostly Eastern European and very popular. If you like the Met-Art or FemJoy networks, you will also like this site. The site has evolved a little, though, and is now featuring several porn stars and starlets that you have seen elsewhere. The videos are well done, dedicated videos. The girls are natural, trimmed or shaved, and solid 9s on the combo body-face scale. Every image and every video is high quality, with no older shoots or videos to disappoint. Even the music selection and timing in the videos seems well done.
Cons:
The overall quality of the images and videos seems to have declined slightly, or, at best, is not keeping up with the standards of other sites. The site format has not been updated in a while and seems a little dated. The number of images in each set has dropped and the highest resolution shots are often upscaled rather than converted from raw files. The site also relies heavily on all-white backgrounds, which was a thing a couple of years ago but seems a little tiresome today.
The site is now breaking out the photo sets and the video sets from a shoot, that used to be one release, into multiple releases. This allows the site to effectively cut the number of shoots in half.
Perhaps the biggest shortcoming that this site has is that it only updates once every 2-4 days. With several other sites updating daily, the potential that this site once had to really compete with the top sites has dulled somewhat.
Bottom Line:
This is a well done site. The photographers and videographers do a very good job of focusing on the girls..and I don't just mean keeping them in focus. The sets, lighting and overall environment combine to create excellent imagery. The videos seem pretty genuine and there are some very good videos both of solo girls, couple and girl-girl scenes.
Navigation on the site is good, allowing you to list by update, model names or model rankings. Downloads are fast. Image selection once in a set has changed since my last visit and no longer allows you to select size. Instead, you get a full screen image and a zoom button that allows you to zoom in considerably. Zips are available in several sizes, usually up to 2500x4000 pixels. Videos come in SD, HD and 4K.
The images are all focused, lit and cropped nicely with no odd or distorted angles, giant panoramas or distractions in the images. Perhaps the only personal thing is that there is a slight shortage of images showing the entire model in a natural position (i.e. without the legs or feet cropped). I'm not a foot fetishist, but I do think several complete images of each model once she is undressed would be nice. Also, several of the more recent image sets are very fuzzy at the high resolution, either because of compression, editing, or both.
Overall, this site could easily fit into the Met Art network as a sex-art clone, or in the Femjoy network as a Joymii clone. There are nicely done photo and video sets, beautiful models and the sex is comparable to the sites I mention above. But the dated format, not-quite-top-tier image quality and less frequent updates mean that this site is no longer one of my top picks. It is still a great site and I highly recommend it, though.
I haven't been a member of X-Art for about 6 months.
But I've read some comments online that X-Art and Colette have published some material from Teen Mega World
and WTF Pass.
I don't know if the comments are true.
But if they are true, that's a real shame that X-Art and Colette are not publishing 100% exclusive content.
If true, I would guess that X-Art and Colette are having financial problems. Or at least trying to conserve cash publishing recycled content.
I'm not saying Teen Mega World or WTF content is poor. Some of their content is excellent. But X-Art was a superior glamcore site, and I hope it continues to product exclusive, glamcore content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed!
Cons:
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets.
Bottom Line:
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site.
I've not been a member for a good while here but just looking at the new site design, whats with all the text description frames appearing when you hover over an image, makes it really annoying to browse in my opinion.
I got a membership to both X-Art and it's sister site Colette the other day and have a bit of a gripe with them. While the amount of videos is great, the HD videos themselves are a bit dull looking. To me the videos look like regular SD videos that have been re-sized and as a result just lack the sharpness and clarity of HD videos on other sites. The file size would back that up too, they are very small, the 1920P average around 350-500 mb. 1080p HD videos from sites like PassionHD and Brazzers are over double that and 1920p can go 2gb+.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The collection of models rivals any porn site on the Net, as far as attractiveness of the models.
-The videos and photosets are professionally shot: excellent lighting, good camera technique, the models are professionally made-up, the costumes are good quality, as well as the sets.
-Choice of hi, standard, low, and mobile definition for videos;
-Choice of hi, medium and low definition for photo sets.
-No download limits.
-No DRM. Download a video or photo set, it's your to keep.
-Zip files for photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
-Epoch is the biller, a respected name for payment processors.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can use download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Excellent download speeds. I get up to 4.6-4.9 MB/sec downloading a file.
-All content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is mainly a well-designed site, that is easy to use.
-No search engine. A good search engine would save a lot of time for members who have specific needs.
-The models are 18 to early 20's. Mostly white. Extremely attractive. There's no variety beyond that. So if you want to see mature women, or different ethnic backgrounds, you won't find it here.
-You can sort the models by popularity, newness, name or age, but the listing order is clunky: You have to scroll down the page numerous times, to bring up more models, instead of just being able to scroll smoothly down to see all the models.
-The action might be too soft for some tastes. This is consensual sex: almost no hitting the women, slapping, spitting, forcible sex.
-Updates average one per 2-or-3 days. Would like more updates. But the site emphasizes quality over quantity, which is a good idea.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of models: 200+
Number of photosets: 800+
Number of videos: 600+
This is one of my favorite glamcore sites. It does an excellent job presenting the models as attractively as possible.
The models are almost all lovely to look at: they range from attractive to stunning to drop-dead gorgeous. Examine the model pages to see what I mean: these girls could be movie stars, based on their physical looks.
Note: The photographer can have a massive effect on how attractive a model appears in a photograph. The X-Art site photographers do a great job in showcasing their models. A model that might appear as just OK or slightly attractive at a different site, can appear to be alluring or beautiful or gorgeous in X-Art photos.
Most of the action is sweet, loving, gentle sex, either solo, twosome (boy-girl, girl-girl), or threesome (mainly 2 girls + 1 boy). The sex is mainly presented as between consenting adults who are giving each other pleasure. There is very
little gonzo sex. Recently, they have introduced a few videos/photosets showing a more forceful, 50-shades-of-grey style, since that seems to be the flavor of the month. But even then, you assume the sex is consensual.
When the site started, it was called "Beauty is Divine", and the content was strictly softcore photos of lovely models, but no videos.
Then the site became "X-Art", and they started adding videos, and the focus changed from softcore photography to glamcore, where they started adding sex, which over time became more and more explicit.
If you haven't tried glamcore, this site is definitely worth at least a 1-month membership, just to see what glamcore is.
The PU discount means $20/month. Considering the quality of the site (exceptionally beautiful models, professionally shot photosets and videos), you get more than your money's worth, if you are into soft, erotic sex. The site has been around since 1999, so there is a large amount of content (photosets and videos) to explore.
I've been a member of this site twice. Once in 2012 and again in the spring of this year. (2015) Oddly enough, the downloads from 2012 are superior quality! The video resolution is the same but it seems X-Art odd shadow and lighting -- maybe on purpose? Half their videos are letterbox, which I don't see a need for.
Time to go back to basics X-Art. You had a good thing going.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Beaufiful, natural girls who seem to be enjoying themselves in very nice settings.
-Well presented site with good navigation (but see cons).
-Video and photo production quality is very good.
-Photos can be downloaded as ZIP files.
-Variety of video download options - the HD MP4 video files are quite small whilst still high quality.
-Content can also be streamed.
-Scenes are not overly long; some of the shorter scenes at less than 20 minutes are especially hot.
-Most scenes are more "romantic" than "porno", with lots of kissing, so this site may be more likely to appeal to women.
-Good value for money with TBP member discount.
-Plenty of girl-girl action if you're into that.
-Works well with my download manager (I use Firefox/DownThemAll) and fast download speeds.
-Can leave comments on scenes and save models/scenes to a favourites list.
-Good usability on mobile phone device.
Cons:
-Navigation isn't as comprehensive as other sites: you can't search for specific types of scene (e.g. anal, interracial etc) though there is a navigation menu option for group sex scenes.
-Scenes can be a bit samey with not a lot of variation, with some scenes being just kissing, blowjob then fucking in one position to end.
-I didn't like the continuous scrolling of pages of content and the models listing, modern though it is; much prefer numbered pages with previous-next navigation as it's much easier to get back to where you were after clicking on a particular scene to watch.
Streaming in HD could be bit choppy more often than not.
Updates don't appear to be daily, but perhaps that's asking for too much?
Group sex and interracial content is a bit thin on this site, though having said that, the interracial content that is there is very hot - check out the scene with Ana!
Not much anal or DP but then that's not really this site's focus.
I'd like to have seen more girls in stockings.
Bottom Line:
This is a great site with plenty of hot content that's a bit different to your average porn site. Models are mostly US and European and the scenes are less "porno" and more "people having and enjoying sex", so not many scenes have facials or anal/DP, but having said that, there are a few anal and DP scenes and some of the US girl's scenes all end with facials. Most scenes end with the guy cumming on her ass, back or on her pussy, with some scenes ending in creampie, which is more "natural" I guess.
Whilst quite a few of the models are recognisable from other sites, most of the models I've never seen on other sites.
Scenes tend to be natural (that word again!) so no sex in every position, just kissing, oral (usually mutual), then fucking in a few positions to the end.
Compared to your average porn site, there's very little chat during the scenes which start with the performers naked, so there's little or no build-up to the action. But having said that, the performers don't tend to make over-faked noises during the action, so not many screaming girls here.
I did find that when I cancelled, I was offered a continuing membership for an extremely low price that was very tempting.
Overall a site worth joining for at least a month.
Just signed in and feel that this is the best Porn Site I've ever signed in :)
+ 4000x2667 Pixel images (about 1 MB each) very good photographic quality ("Art" is merited, without exaggerating in any way, it's all very natural)
+ FullHD Videos
+ Only the most beautiful young girls, perfect selection (for my taste) without the need to search the pearls in a "heap of disgust". Beautiful hair, pure skin, healthy models, good shape, nice smiles - everything very stylish and neat.
+ fast download (1.2 MBps, the maximum my line allows)
+ Girl introduction set / Masturbation / Lesbian / Lovely fucking / VERY PRETTY Blowjobs / 3 BEAUTIFUL Girls, GGB
+ almost no anal
+ no tricks, no cross-selling (as far as I can tell now)
+ Files are named
+ Enormous amount of material.
+ There are nice and tasteful comments for each scene.
+ Seems they make the material themselves (=exclusive).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-absolutely beautiful natural girls who appear to be enthusiastic and well looked after
-well presented site with multiple streaming/download options
-good value for money compared to some others
-high quality shoots, excellent production values
-good mix of established and unknown girls
-Angelica's "Goodnight Kiss" is almost worth the subscription alone!
Cons:
-very little variation in themes/scenes/styles/locations. if you're looking for anything other than two people having tasteful sex in a white room with white sheets then maybe try elsewhere
-website could be improved with a better tags and filters system
-sister site colette.com is now being heavily promoted and standards on x-art seem to have gone down slightly since its launch
-it's definitely more "x" than "art" these days, I'd like to see a little more artistic license being used
Bottom Line:
If you are looking for high quality content with stunning, natural girls then I would recommend this all day long.
Maybe against my better judgement I rejoined briefly on a discount to pick up some updates I liked the look of. Seriously this site has gone downhill, but now they seem to have stopped bothering completely.
There have been loads of days recently with no updates, lots of old stuff being reposted (without stating it is old), and almost all the blogging is about the rough new site Colette.com.
In the last 4 days there has been 1 update, and that was a reject from Colette.com which wasn't hard enough for that site - it was with Aubrey who had just done an anal scene and been so hurt by it that she couldn't do the anal planned in this scene so they just stuffed it up on x-art instead. It really is just rough hardcore porn now, and Brigham Field seems to have almost nothing to do with the site any more.
They seem to have given up on this site completely - why shouldn't the members do the same?
My guess is that new subscriptions/renewals will drop off significantly, if they keep those prices.
That's a shame, because X-Art is my favorite glamcore site.
But I certainly won't be paying the new listed prices.
The way they film the video is get amazing. I like that they don't get into the useless staged conversations to get to the sex. They just let the models do their thing, and the models have great chemistry with each other. Great stuff.
Anybody else having trouble downloading from this site. It's terribly slow and can take upwards of 15-20 minutes just to download even the 960X540 file format. I really enjoy the site but I had to cancel my subscription because of this issue.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Holy. Crap. This site is absolutely insane. I'm a girl and love watching porn so having a sexy, young, ever-new site like X-Art is essential for me.
I've never seen hotter girls anywhere. They get the top top models from all over the world and they do the dirtiest stuff. I can stay on there for hours.
I love the production value and how real the girls look. They actually LOVE doing what they do.
They have every type of video for whatever mood you're in: solo, girl-girl, threesomes, orgies... it goes on and on.
Cons:
It's hard to think of something they can improv on but I guess I'd say I wish they had 3 updates a day :)
Bottom Line:
You MUST join. Even for 1 month and you'll know what I'm talking about. Even if I'm not horny I'll log on to check our their new videos and I automatically get turned on and have to play with myself. Both the guys and the girls are sexy and irresistible.
Since today you can download only .mp4-Files. There are no .wmv-Files available. They have also removed the .wmf-.Files from the history. There was no Information on the Website or blog.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
