Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : BrighamXart (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (9)         Other:   Site Feedback (368)   |   Replies Received (3)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 76-81 of 81 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
76
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

Confused

This looks ok (great models) at the preview - but certainly NOT sure about the content - NOT from brummies newly review, anyway...

TBP states no videos, except streaming behind the scenes - though the preview say 'videos'. Even read webmasters earlier reply to Drooler - but I'm not more clear here.

Like lk2fireone this user would be gratefull for some usefull info/update - if anyone?

02-05-10  07:49am

Replies (4)
Review
77
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful young slim models professionally photographed. Not porn star type models. Young fresh faces enjoying the cameras eye. No cosmetic body enhancements. Video technique improving with time. Increasing use of video.
Cons: Shoots need more of a story line using clothing props. Fantasy build up from clothed to nude instead of too many similar nude shots in one set however beautiful they are. Improved eye contact with camera.
Bottom Line: This site is the best in it's field & improving with each update. I find it very rewarding for my erotic needs & the photographer is open to ideas. Highly recommended.

02-04-10  09:23pm

Replies (4)
Review
78
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: # nice girls
# good quality
# HDV videos
# partial HC content
# functional design
Cons: # HIGH PRICE
# 1 update every 4th day
# small archive
# no bonus contents
Bottom Line: X-art aka Beauty Is Divine was always a great source for inspiration full of angelic looking babes.

I see the change from BID to X-Art with mixed feelings. The additional hc content stays in total contrast to the "old" days and unique contents and make it just another teensite.

I totally disagree with majestix opinion because the price is way to high for a site that updates only every 4th day and offers a small archive.

X-art is for people who do not need a daily update and don't want to miss nicely shaped and flexible teens in quality scenes.

02-01-10  02:11am

Replies (2)
Comment
79
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

Site worth joining?

This site has some absolutely yummy models. But as Drooler noted in a comment on July 29, 2009, in spite of the high-quality photos, the quantity of pix seems small. Any recent members have an opinion on whether the site is worth joining for a month? Like I said, some of the models are fucking gorgeous.

01-30-10  10:13am

Replies (0)
Review
80
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Extremely high quality and original content. Photographic style that captures the beauty of the girls. I have never been disappointed by an update. The memberships costs are extremely low for the quality of the content and frequency of updates.
Cons: The updates could contain more photographs but everything that is in the updates is pure quality. No filler shots
Bottom Line: This site has amazing content. Many of the photographs have an editorial quality and uniqueness that is hard to come by. The quality is 2nd to none. I am continually impressed by the quality found at this site. I highly recommend this site.

10-03-09  12:40am

Replies (0)
Comment
81
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

Wasn't Very Impressed

I recently rejoined this site (had joined once before when it was called "Beauty is Divine"). It was better, yet by no great measure in terms of the content.

The photo sizes are larger, but the galleries are usually small and the updates are infrequent. And the site navigation has idiosyncrasies that took some getting used to.

Really, it's pretty much like it was before: If you appreciate artistic nude photography, you might like it.

I gave it a second chance as an erotic photo site and, though there were a small number of things I enjoyed, it didn't satisfy me very much overall.

I'd wait several days for an update; one would finally come; I'd view it and find it lacking. That's how I remember this site.

It would be a mistake for this user to rejoin a third time in the future.

07-29-09  04:52pm

Replies (2)

Shown : 76-81 of 81 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.