| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
18 Years Old
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU discounted membership of $17.95/month (recurring).
-483 Updates. This is one of the larger sites in the Porn Pros network.
-You get access to the basic Porn Pros network with membership. (Access to the premium sites costs a one-time fee of $69.95).
-A wide variety of niches served by the 22 sites in the basic network.
-Navigation is basic, but easy.
-A large number of mostly attractive, white teen models engaging in hardcore sex.
-Videos are good quality: professionally shot: good lighting, good camera-work, good sound control, sets are not cheap (but not expensive, either).
-Unlimited downloading.
-Unlimited streaming. |
| Cons: |
-Cons are basically minor.
-Cross-sale on join page. Note: even if you uncheck the cross-sale box, you might still be charged the cross-sale membership fee. If you are charged, make sure you contact the biller to dispute the fee.
-Nag screen each time you log in to upgrade to premium status for $69.95.
-Have to check a box each time you log in to verify you are not a robot.
-There is a variation of the box-to-check to prove you are not a robot: You may have to check all the boxes in a visual where there is a street sign, to prove you are not a robot. This is the only paysite I can remember where I have to prove I'm not a robot, after I've already paid for my membership, each time I log in.
-Some ads on each page for cross-sales to other paysites. And an ad to upgrade to premium status.
-Slow, irregular update rate for the site. However, the basic network gets 2 or 3 new videos per week.
-Although the models are mainly attractive young teens, I've been spoiled by the glamcore sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Sometimes the videos stop steaming.
-Sometimes the photo sets fail to load.
BOTTOM LINE:
This is the current list of sites listed at the "Sites" page:
THE NUMBER OF NAMES IS 17
Here are the sorted names.
18 Years Old;
40ozBounce;
CockCompetition;
CrueltyParty;
DeepThroatLove;
Disgraced18;
EuroHumpers;
FlexiblePositions;
FreaksOfBoobs;
FreaksOfCock;
JurassicCock;
MassageCreep;
MilfHumiliation;
PimpParade;
RealExGirlfriends;
ShadyPi;
TeenBFF.
Before the glamcore sites like X-Art, Blacked, and Tushy came out, the Porn Pros network was an excellent site:
It had a large number of attractive teen models who were engaging in hardcore teen sex. The quality of the videos was excellent for the time.
However, since X-Art, Blacked and Tushy started publishing videos and photosets where the same girls (and other attractive teen models) are showcased, the Porn Pros network suffers in comparison:
The glamcore models are presented to showcase their glamor and attractiveness: High quality, professional lighting, expensive costumes, expensive or upgraded sets, use of professional photographers that strive to make the models as attractive and glowing as possible.
So the same models at Porn Pros just don't look as good.
The porn pros network has the advantage of massive content compared to the glamcore sites.
But the glamcore sites present the models like starlets in a movie with sex. (Except that a movie with sex would have a better plot and better acting). The glamcore sites try to add a tiny plot line, to give the sex more meaning. And the glamcore sites try to add different factors: a sensual element, kisses, interaction between the stunt cock and the model beyond gonzo sex, etc.
Porn pros does give value. But it's a question of what you want to pay for:
A glamcore site, where the models look glamourous.
Or a hardcore teen network, where the models are attractive, but it's missing the glamourous approach.
There are some minor negatives to the network. But it's basically easy to navigate-except for the missing sites. There is a huge number of attractive models featured in hardcore scenes. Download speeds are good, 3-4 MB/sec.
Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p.
You can stream the videos in standard or HD definition.
The network has minor glitches:
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
--Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states:
Forbidden. We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
-The request to verify you are not a robot, before you can log in to the site.
-The ads you have to ignore, when browsing the pages. You paid for a membership, so why can't you enjoy the site without a bunch of ads? Because they want the rest of your money.
In spite of the minor annoyances, the network does give good value. But it's a question of where you want to spend your money: there are plenty of sites that give good value for your money, and it's difficult to find the best sites to join.
Which is not the worst problem in the world.
With a little searching, you can find porn sites that are a worthwhile join.
Porn Pros would have been an amazing site back in the 1970s or 1980s.
In 2016, it's a good site, worth joining, but not the outstanding value it would have been many years ago. |
|
01-10-17 05:46am
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
18 Years Old
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- exclusive content of hot teenage girls. Maybe they are not all 18 but they look pretty young, don't get me wrong they are not little Lupe or lolitas but they look like young ladies ready to get satisfied.
- a lot of fun role-play. Almost each scene has a certain twist or fun little detail. In one scene the girl just graduated and is dressed in a cap and gown. In another the girl is a scout or a cheerleader. Seeing a hot teen try to cheer with cum on her face is extremely hot. However the girls never take it to seriously. They laugh at how ridiculous a scene is and everybody seems to have a good time as opposed to sites that go all the way trying to pretend the girls are something they are not.
- 175 scenes (video, photos and screencaps) wmv and mpg high quality formats as well as some other smaller formats and photos are zipped. For me again, the downloads went fine. Ten hq videos downloaded in about 30-40 minutes.
- easy to navigate + search for a model.
- network access |
| Cons: |
- as with all porn pros websites you have to accept the silliness of some stuff. Of course that girl didn't just graduate, of course she didn't loose her dog. It's all a show and you can tell it's a show. If that turns you on, this site rocks if it doesn't then it will annoy you.
- website loading times can get annoying at times. The whole network needs more servers as pages load a bit slowly.
- never got that streaming player to work.
- ads on the pages. Sometimes flashing , especially the ads for live cameras on the top
- the male character drives around in the beginning of most videos talking about all sort of stuff. Sometimes this is pointless and annoying, sometimes it's relevant and fun...it's almost a 50-50 chance that something said will piss someone off... |
| Bottom Line: |
I mentioned in another review for Cock Competition that the whole Porn Pros network has a jock / frat boy feel to it. Never is this more obvious than on this site (in my humble opinion)
I remember a discussion where the main character claims he never banged a cheerleader and the camera man laughs saying that now a dream comes true (spoiler alert: the guy has sex with a girl dressed up as a cheerleader). The whole site feels like that, fun, joking about everything, including the acting in the scenes and a bit high-school-ish. I would almost hazard to say that this is the site we would have made back in tenth grade when we couldn't get laid with the most beautiful girl around, but dreamed of having our own porn site (please tell me I wasn't the only one with that dream).
This whole approach works fine if you like to get amused by porn, however if you like it to be more serious or the girls to be completely innocent/abused/taking control of the situation...well this is not really the place for that kind of stuff. What they offer is mostly regular boy-girl scenes with nice angles, hot girls and a bit of role-playing/story.
Again, it all depends on what you want from your porn. There are other teen sites where the girls are little angels, there are other sites where the girls are little devils but here more than anywhere else I felt like the models were girls trying to act like porn stars and having a good laugh while doing it.
P.S. Some stats about videos and photos: hq videos vary between 512x218 and 740x404 and in size range from around 300mb to 500-600mb and photos come in at around 850px × 850px |
|
08-05-09 01:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
18 Years Old
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Top tier young hot pornstars
- Entertaining direction and the "innocent young girl" theme can be very hot
- Vivid colors in sets/wardrobe - fairly attractive videos
- Attractive site design |
| Cons: |
- Update schedule is awful: 1/week at most and frequently a girl is advertised whose scene has not yet been posted
- Lighting could be better: videos slightly reddish
- 18yo/super young conceit taken a little far - who wants to see an obvious 21yo play with a stuffed animal
- Director sometimes dominates the action - doesn't give the girls a chance to be sexy
- No network content; incredibly weak bonus -content |
| Bottom Line: |
There is some very good, even awesome content on this site, but I have a very hard time justifying the price with such a slow update schedule and such weak bonus content. |
|
01-12-07 04:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
18 Years Old
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots Of Hardcore Material
- Some Hot Girls, Including A Few Well Known
- Videos Well Done With One Exception (See Cons)
- A Riley Mason Set! |
| Cons: |
- Site Design Is Poor
- No Photo Zip Files :(
- All Photos Per Set On One Page
- Cameraman/Director Can't Keep Quiet
- Weak Bonus Content |
| Bottom Line: |
OK, I have a thing for Riley Mason, so strike that pro! I have mixed feelings for this site. I primarily collect photos, and collecting them here is a chore. No zips---no good! They also have each set's photos loaded onto one page, and sometimes when you click and save, the page reloads, some pages have up to 700 pics---no good. The pic quality varies also. A lot of the pics are very good though. I do like vids too, and their's is a good selection. All exclusive, the vids are fun and hot. Well vidoegraphed, but the cameraman is constantly chattering away, I hate that! Why don't porn producers of all people realize that we are not interested in the guys! They are props, and should be seen and not heard! Focus on the girls please! They're more natural in front of the camera. But, I don't think you'd be disappointed in these videos if you like hardcore with young ladies. The vids have an atmosphere of lightness, compared to a lot of the grim circus porn you see nowadays. Bonus content isn't worth looking at, but personally that doesn't concern me. I would give this site a higher score if it was better designed. If all you care about is vids, you'll be just fine. But for pic collectors, you have carpel tunnel syndrome ahead of you. |
|
07-18-07 11:56pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
5
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
12-16-11 07:19am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
6
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
10-14-09 08:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
7
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
09-22-09 06:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
8
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
01-25-08 07:04am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
9
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
01-19-08 03:13pm
Replies (29)
|
Comment
10
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
11-11-07 02:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
11
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
03-07-07 03:03pm
Replies (0)
|
|
