Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from Cybertoad:
One of the best reviews I have seen by a newbie, looking at this review one would not think you were new . GREAT JOB!!! keep up the great work.
CT
|
05-30-12 08:57am
|
Reply
102
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from mbaya:
Great review that I really enjoyed reading. One of the best ever by a newbie. I hope to see more reviews form you.
|
05-28-12 11:29am
|
Reply
103
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Great and detailed review. Keep em coming!
|
05-28-12 01:23am
|
Reply
104
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from Capn:
Very nicely done, my friend.
I do hope you will be a regular contributor.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-28-12 01:02am
|
Reply
105
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from gaypornolover:
Superb review, welcome to the site!
|
05-27-12 06:53pm
|
Reply
106
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Claypaws's Reply)
Thanks for the detailed reply, I really enjoyed reading it, Claypaws! I am always astounded how people go about collecting in such a different manner from the one I am used to. To me the model has always been secondary to what she was wearing, actually I shouldn't say that, she is very important but she should also be dressed in something alluring.
I really dislike the practical turn most photo shoots have taken with everyday clothing like Jeans or Jean skirts and tops and not much underneath becoming the norm.
I was a member only recently and looked at update after update and after my initial elimination of "extreme" hair there was never anything left that appealed to me because of that factor.
I actually ended up downloading videos rather than photo sets eventually, if the model was pretty, that way I didn't have to look at nude studies for three, four pages.
Yes, you are right, I like Sean R. more than I dislike him, even though I don't like the heavy make-up he puts on some of his models, but I always liked him for letting his models keep their panties on for longer than one page! I love crotch shots with panties still on! :-)
Your way of collecting gives me a greater understanding as to why so many people gave high ratings to sets I found quite frankly bland. I always suspected that they voted for the model more than for the set and you confirmed this. Which is fine, of course .. I simply did not take other folks' tastes into consideration when I did my complaining, which no doubt might have made me a too subjective in my reviews..
I do have my favorite models, Isabella being one of them, but if she did not sport enticing, erotic lingerie I tended to leave her latest set on the site.
You are lucky, you will never be caught by surprise by changing tastes in clothes and lingerie because a beautiful woman will always remain beautiful if it is SHE you are collecting!
Nice chatting with you, Claypaws.
|
05-27-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
107
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another tremendous informative review Claypaws. I hope you stay with PU and become a regular contributor.
|
05-27-12 05:42pm
|
Reply
108
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from messmer:
Great review, Claypaws! I am happy to see that they (according to what I read into your remarks) are starting to steer away from an over abundance of hairy leg, arm, butt sets and concentrate on what they used to do best, showing beautiful, natural models who retained their pubic hair.
This was one of my favorite sites for many years. Maybe, if the almost daily addition of "extreme" hair has been reduced, I shall subscribe again. It really did look as if they were happily going the other way and became a true fetish site for me.
|
05-27-12 10:25am
|
Reply
109
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from elephant:
(Claypaws's Reply)
Yeah quite easy to do then on the American sites cause the majority of these babes love the tats, I just wish they'd stop having them and fake boobs too, stay natural is much more sexy.
|
05-27-12 12:49am
|
Reply
110
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from PinkPanther:
(Claypaws's Reply)
Good job on the complete info, Claypaws. She's an odd looking girl when you see vids of her. It looks like her jaw needs some surgical correction when she talks - I'm not being insulting, that's just how it struck me. But when she takes her clothes off and shakes that ass, damn is she sexy!
|
05-23-12 08:07pm
|
Reply
111
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Claypaws's Reply)
It's nice to meet another Gloria fan here. She's my favourite Diesel model, but there are several others who aren't far off. I know people who wouldn't find her attractive, but she damn near perfection in my book.
Is it easy to turn java and flash off?
|
05-23-12 05:32pm
|
Reply
112
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Claypaws's Reply)
I think that this is the first time that someone has reviewed one of my reviews so thoroughly. Thanks for doing that and I hope that you did find it useful.
For the 317 pages, my guess is that you're right that the error comes from including all of the diesel sites too. I didn't notice that until slutty mentioned it but I would have felt cheated if I made my decision to buy a membership thinking that it was a large site. The current site has nothing to apologize for given the great quality, so I hope they fix this mistake soon.
The Wow Girls site does have the ability to shrink the size of the thumbnials and I did use that but I found that the picture pages still loaded slowly. That might be a factor of the way I select the pages though. Because they have to be downloaded through the browser I'd go to a model's page and open the sets I wanted in a new tab and work my way through the tabs. Opening two or three tabs didn't seem to be an issue, but opening more than five was a problem. The problem might be the way I'm using the site.
I don't want to get anyone's back up in answering your question, but the answer is that not much is left if you remove the material you listed. This is a guess (after browsing through the site to get a sense of what the count is) but I'd say there are fewer than 50 photo sets that don't have what you prefer to avoid. I have to add one huge caveat to this answer though - I'm no fan of screencaps or photos which simply mirror a video but with this site, like the Diesel sites, the photo shoot doesn't detract from the video and the videos don't detract from the photos. I'm not sure how the site does it, but the two can really stand apart.
I hope that answered your question. If not, let me know and I'll try to get the information you're looking for.
|
05-22-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
113
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from elephant:
(Claypaws's Reply)
Thanks very much also Claypaws for the extra info on Riley, looks like she has a few other things I might like to check out, love the makeup and her look on ftv though, they make her look perfect. Models can often look quite different on other sites, I haven't checked any of these other sites so figures crossed so looks equally as cute.
|
05-22-12 09:42am
|
Reply
114
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from elephant:
I'm a huge fan of the improvements this network as gone under the last year or so, so much better than it used to be and the models are so cute its unreal. I was thinking yeah maybe they should make it more clearer though that the site isn't really that much for the photo lover as it is much more based on the movies. I for one are the opposite of you and realy only a movie lover, photos don't really do much for me anymore. But there is some decent photos of Gloria on her site, I really like her too and have looked at a few sets, some really good shots of her, that said I'm not a photo expert. I hope the network carrys onto grow and I'd love to see wowgirls being added to the network.
There is sadly very few sites that do amazing photos and amazing movies, I think most companies concentrate on one think and become experts at that,The Diesel network I have to say are pretty damn incredible when it comes to movies.
|
05-20-12 05:48am
|
Reply
115
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from slutty:
While I generally like this site, like rearadmiral, I can see where you are coming from as a photo lover (I have been in a video phase lately). Most of the photo sets I have saved are average, like you mentioned some are just vidcaps - which is sort of pointless to even post on a site in my opinion.
Welcome to PU, looking forward to hearing more from you.
|
05-19-12 10:59pm
|
Reply
116
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from tangub:
As a photo lover myself I have to agree with what you're saying in this comment. I scored the site 85 in my review last October and I feel that was over generous considering what I actually got from the site, I guess I was trying to be objective and rate the site in its overall value to those who also enjoy videos. I'm also a big fan of Goria aka Kylie A and out of interest just went back to see what I downloaded of her from YLP. All I got of her was 4 solo sets in 2000px, they may have been available in 4000px but I can't remember and tend to opt for full sets in 2000 to save on disk space. I later found 2 of those sets on The Life Erotic where she is named Elise so they are certainly by no means exclusive to YLP.
Like you I have little interest in videos, or boy girl and lesbian action. They do have many hot models here but it is difficult to appreciate them when most of the photos have a maximum size of 1000px and I certainly don't see the point of those shitty screencap galleries, surely they have no use to photo or video lovers. I certainly hope the site continues to improve on the quality of the photographic side as promised by the webmaster here as that might tempt me back one day.
|
05-19-12 12:34am
|
Reply
117
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from tangub:
Welcome aboard, this is an outstanding first review. I will certainly look forward to seeing more input from you as you seem to have very similar tastes to my own in enjoying photography of solo females.
|
05-19-12 12:07am
|
Reply
118
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment from Claypaws:
It is refreshingly honest of you to say that your photo sets are "very average". I would like to see your tour being more up-front about being video biased. Most users probably are more interested in video anyway. We photo-lovers are rather in a minority and I fear that, one day, we will find we can longer get photos and have to leave the world of porn subscribing behind. That will be a sad day. Fortunately, I have over 2 TB of photos.
But if you are really going to give still photography some quality attention, I will be interested to see it, particularly if it is of Gloria. I am not interested in sets with toys, or with masturbation. I love to see full pussy spreads with full eye contact and the face in focus. When you get some quality photos, I will definitely be prepared to give the network another chance.
Yes, I did see skinnysupergirl.com
I was a member of the full Diesel network for a month from 15 December 2011. skinnysupergirl was the main reason I signed up to the network.
I have saved 32 Gloria photo sets from skinnysupergirl, of which 12 sets are true photo-sets at 4000x2666, though, as you say, they are very "average" in quality and interest. I am sure I have seen one or two of them elsewhere too though, if I did, I did not consider them worth downloading then. The other 20 sets are 1000x562 vidcaps. If there are 36 real photo sets with her then either they have been added since mid January 2012, or I saw them and found them too uninspiring to download, or I missed them, which seems unlikely since finding photos on that site was my reason for joining the network.
I also downloaded 17 videos of Gloria from that site and 8 from the rest of the Diesel Network. I agree that the videos are excellent, as videos go. I downloaded them because otherwise, I would have felt I got no value from the Network, as a photo-lover. If you were to produce solo photo shoots of Gloria, without toys or masturbation, of a quality equal to the videos, you would get a rating in the high 80s from me. As of now, there are excellent such photo sets of Gloria (as Kylie) on MET-MODELS (now called eroticbeauty), MET-ART, Femjoy (as Valonia)and Averotica. I also got good sets of her from the now defunct 66Beauty (as Susi). They were ruined by a silly watermark and a horrid grey border but otherwise were moderately interesting though well below the calibre of the MET-MODELS or Averotica sets.
There is no video of her anywhere that comes anywhere near the quality of yours. But video is not my thing. The one called "Fuck me" is almost enough to convert me though :-)
|
05-18-12 04:42pm
|
Reply
119
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
from Drooler:
I had a look at the review I'd written about this site five years ago, and I was struck by how similar the main pros and cons were to what you've written here.
I like the site, but I like it as I would anything else that I know is also flawed in some respects. It's a good site, just not as good as it should be.
Lola/Dido is one of the more magnetic models who appear here (magnetic as always, wherever). But I was struck at how "distant" Eufrat seemed here at least some of the time compared to the stuff she's done with lots of other sites, particularly the ATK sites and TorridArt.
You've written an outstanding review. Hats off!
|
05-18-12 04:14pm
|
Reply
120
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from dieselman:
We almost have no duplication, only few scenes for promotion of different sites/
Now about overrated network and rating us between 70 to 75 - oh no :) No way here. We have created so great much scenes and our cooperation with girls is unique. We brought a lot of innovations and interaction with models. I find our sites very well rated by members here and underrated by staff of TBP and I hope it will get better. Members know better then staff, that's for sure!
Thank you for your time guys and see you in our world again!
|
05-18-12 02:43pm
|
Reply
121
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from dieselman:
About splitting the sites.
You do know that we were among the first solo site makers online and it had huge success. This is why we have a lot of sites and those solo girl sites are not just regular sites, we are talking here about following the girl for many many years. This is not "point and shoot 200 sets in one flat and create website", this is a real get to know the girl and follow her, talk to her live and become friends.
This experience is priceless and yet very costly so this is how it works with us and I think we did a great job, creating awesome platform where you can easily switch between sites and getting all within two clicks. This is actually very popular among our members.
|
05-18-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
122
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from dieselman:
The photo sets.
Well, we have the best films online, it's unarguable, but our photo sets are very average which is unarguable as well.
I am a big fan of cinema myself and we love image in motion but saying that, we are going to blow up our photography this summer. We are going to change the standards of photography as we did with filming.
So if you are interested in photography, we got a lot of nice photo sets but they are not captivating enough as our films and we are definitely more in filming. Give us few months and we will surprise you with our photography skills and its quality.
As for Gloria's photo sets, we have 36 real photo sets with her. Have you seen her solo girl site, www.skinnysupergirl.com?
|
05-18-12 02:39pm
|
Reply
123
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from dieselman:
Hey guys!
I am the man behind the network and I love talking to our members! :) Thank you for your comments, please allow me to get into your discussion :)
The exclusivity of our models.
We nowhere claimed that all our models are exclusive, though a lot of them were discovered by us. We brought a lot of great stars to web, Ivana, Sasha, Natasha, Kat, Alice and the list is quite long. I love to get real girls rather then models, but the ones we found already modeling, got much better scenes with us.
Girls love to be with us, our approach in creation of content is much different, it's like another world comparing to industry standards. For example, take the girl Gloria, the one you commenting about, there was no chance to get her filmed in masturbation scene. NO CHANCE. And a Girl-Girl scene with Gloria? NEVER EVEN THINK ABOUT IT. Year ago it wouldn't be even funny, but today - we got it! Real girl-girl scenes with Gloria. We have managed to create the right atmosphere for her so she feels attracted by the idea of girl-girl action and it took us one year!
Take Sasha and making her go hardcore? FORGET IT AND NEVER ASK AGAIN, couple of months and voila :) Same goes with almost all girls who came to us.
So, some girls were modeling already and I care more about rediscovering them! Girls love to be with us and you can feel it in the scenes of course and that's why they are popular.
|
05-18-12 02:36pm
|
Reply
124
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from skippy:
(Claypaws's Reply)
I upgraded to Win 7 and IE-9 and I get no more BMP files. Thanks for the info!
|
05-18-12 01:23pm
|
Reply
125
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Comment
from rearadmiral:
As a former member who scored the site at 95 I was prepared to disagree with you, but you make some valid points. I’m not a big collector of photos so when I collect them I only collect those of models I really like. I did download a lot of photos from this network and was impressed with the quality. But I can understand how someone who is primarily interested in photos would find this site a bit disappointing.
I wasn’t aware that the models here aren’t exclusive until fairly recently. I don’t know or follow many European or Russian models so I made the assumption that they were exclusive since many of the models work together and the production values are equally high in all the videos.
I strongly agree with you that the way the site is organized doesn’t work well. There is no good reason to spread a model’s videos and photos throughout the ‘network.’ And it can be especially frustrating to see the same videos repeated, though that isn’t a common occurrence. It would seem to make a lot more sense to sell this as one large site and not as many small ones. I suspect the reason for the setup is that it makes it easier to sell as a network than a site even if all the material is the same.
But… being a video fan and really liking many of the models here, this ‘network’ is one that is on my list of sites that I return to occasionally to look for updates.
|
05-17-12 02:15pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
