| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
slutty (0)
|
Nice review rearadmiral, sounds like a place to keep an eye on. I just wish these guys gave a more in depth preview, as I am curious how much overlap there is - not that I don't trust deiselman, I'd just like to see for myself.
It is sort of troublesome that they show on the scenes preview page 317 pages of scenes (which one could extrapalote to over 7000 scenes given the number shown). Perhaps just an error.
|
05-21-12 04:48pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - slutty :
I haven't had a membership at the Diesel sites in a while but I didn't notice much overlap. Dieselman seems like a webmaster who takes an interest in his customers and I trust him when he explained the overlap.
The 317 pages of scenes is definitely an error. When you log in there are 25 pages of updates. I hope Dieselman pops in and sees your comment because that little error could make some people a bit mad.
And I agree with you 100% that the site should offer a more thorough preview. There is no reason not to - the models are amazing and the site is great. They should show it off to prospective mmebers.
|
05-21-12 05:13pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
Another top-quality review, thank you!
|
05-21-12 11:28pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Claypaws (Suspended)
|
Excellent review which makes it clear from what standpoint it is written too. Very balanced and comprehensive and a great job done.
I wonder if the 317 pages of updates in the preview are in fact the preview for Diesel Network + WOW Girls combined. That would clearly be a mistake. I agree they should include some more samples in the preview as it gives not a lot of indication as to what is in the site.
On the matter of exclusivity, I regard content as exclusive if those particular photos or videos are unique to the site. It does not matter that the models are not exclusive. Many models appear on multiple sites but any site can have exclusive content of a non-exclusive model. I could easily go through their model directory and identify the models I have seen on other sites and probably list their alias names too. But it would still be true that this site's content is exclusive provided the photos and videos on this site do not appear elsewhere.
You mention the big thumbnails. When I was a member of the Diesel Network, there was a slider on the thumbnail page. You could use it to reduce the thumbnail size to a more manageable one that loaded much faster. Perhaps WOW Girls could have a similar feature.
If you are still with me, I have a question. If you were to remove from this site all the videos, all the gg, bg, peeing, toys, masturbation, behind-the-scenes, photos shot as part of a video shoot, and any content duplicated from sites in the Diesel Network, how much would remain?
I ask because I do like their girls but I am not interested in any of the type of content I mention in that list. My question does not in any way detract from your great review or from your score.
|
05-22-12 04:54am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - gaypornolover :
Thanks for the compliment!
|
05-22-12 03:07pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Claypaws :
I think that this is the first time that someone has reviewed one of my reviews so thoroughly. Thanks for doing that and I hope that you did find it useful.
For the 317 pages, my guess is that you're right that the error comes from including all of the diesel sites too. I didn't notice that until slutty mentioned it but I would have felt cheated if I made my decision to buy a membership thinking that it was a large site. The current site has nothing to apologize for given the great quality, so I hope they fix this mistake soon.
The Wow Girls site does have the ability to shrink the size of the thumbnials and I did use that but I found that the picture pages still loaded slowly. That might be a factor of the way I select the pages though. Because they have to be downloaded through the browser I'd go to a model's page and open the sets I wanted in a new tab and work my way through the tabs. Opening two or three tabs didn't seem to be an issue, but opening more than five was a problem. The problem might be the way I'm using the site.
I don't want to get anyone's back up in answering your question, but the answer is that not much is left if you remove the material you listed. This is a guess (after browsing through the site to get a sense of what the count is) but I'd say there are fewer than 50 photo sets that don't have what you prefer to avoid. I have to add one huge caveat to this answer though - I'm no fan of screencaps or photos which simply mirror a video but with this site, like the Diesel sites, the photo shoot doesn't detract from the video and the videos don't detract from the photos. I'm not sure how the site does it, but the two can really stand apart.
I hope that answered your question. If not, let me know and I'll try to get the information you're looking for.
|
05-22-12 03:26pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Claypaws (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - rearadmiral :
Thank you for replying so thoroughly to my comment and question. A careful review deserves careful reading :-) The review was very useful to me. And it is interesting how a well written and very favourable review can give me the information I need to conclude that a site is not to my taste.
I think your answer to my question should not get anyone's back up. It helps to make clear who might enjoy the site and who might not. It would seem that the site is not for me but the review and your supplementary answer make it clear that it does very well indeed in its own niche and that those who enjoy that niche would be very satisfied. I had hoped this could be another site with Gloria material that pleases me but I feared this was unlikely. Your answer confirms my fears.
I am also a multiple tab man. On some sites, java that executes on pages can slow things down a lot in multiple tabs and if the site will work with java (not javascript) turned off, this can sometimes speed things up. I usually turn off both java and flash unless there is some significant feature that needs either of those.
|
05-22-12 03:55pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Claypaws :
It's nice to meet another Gloria fan here. She's my favourite Diesel model, but there are several others who aren't far off. I know people who wouldn't find her attractive, but she damn near perfection in my book.
Is it easy to turn java and flash off?
|
05-23-12 05:32pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Claypaws (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #8 - rearadmiral :
Gloria (as Kylie) has been a favourite of mine since I first saw her on MET about two and a half years ago. I still think her best photo sets are on what used to be MET Models, now called Erotic Beauty but I also love her photos on Averotica. Diesel seems to be the only source of extensive video of her. I think she is just about perfect too. I love that body type, but, above all, I adore her face and expressions.
The easiest way to turn off java and flash is to use Firefox and download a very useful addon from the addons.mozilla.org site. The addon is called PrefBar. It is simpler and easier to use than the much more comprehensive NoScript addon. When you have installed PrefBar, you get a PB icon in the toolbar (next to home and refresh etc). PB has check toggles for java, javascript, flash, animation and a few other things. Turning on and off is as easy as clicking them. I haven't checked if you already use Firefox but no porn user should be using IE!
|
05-26-12 01:47am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
elephant (0)
|
Yes very informative review and great to see someones review of this exciting new site. I'm a total fan of their other site so think I'm gonna enjoy this one, would love to of seen it as part of the network, maybe for $34.99 and included all sites. Still its very up my street with the models included so I'm going to like it I think.
Another huge Gloria fan too, she is something else, very catwalk model like which I love, the kind of stunner you see and go oh wow she is unique and beautiful, often the really cute models have a very unique look and Gloria is one of them and her bod is perfection to say the least, has to have one of the hottest pussies too that she seem to love to be playing with, love to see her in more girl/girl material.
Only other 2 models that are in her league that I brand ultra models (they have to of had their own solo site) are Nata (who was around a while back now but had this real endearing quality to her and stood out as a nude model) and the other one Kat from lay the Kat, she was so myseterious and I just loved her, she had a real beauty sparkle about her. There is not many that are ultra models around but its great when I find a new one. Gloria ticks all the boxes for me.
|
05-27-12 03:32am
Reply To Message
|
