Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Hi there I was a member a few years ago and why the review is Independent from the past review. 80 is a good score by the way.
It does give me perspective on improvement.
I rated the site higher years ago, because it was cutting edge, fresh and new.
Now not so much.
However the site is not consistent in format, I found many that were not the same format or even available. I never said they did not work on mac I said some formats may not and this is true. More like 75% from my use.
I did notice that you did not address the DL managers the site is designed to make it difficult, I can see your points but stand by my experience.
Surfing using thumbnails that are not stationary, means I can not come back in two days and see the same pic in the same place. Because of votes. So the thumbnail is old school been around along time.
The site is really good but not great in my opinion, and I based my experience on current access. Sorry I just call em as I see them.
|
04-30-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
2
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Cybertoad:
(zachvenice's Reply)
I'm about to try the site again, look nice.
|
03-04-10 10:39am
|
Reply
3
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Thanks for your reply.
Overall; your site just needs to be packaged and presented better.
I think a chronological style for your updates would be better than having so many different categories.
I Don't really want to go to the model index to search for sets; or by the top rated- just different tastes. I know everyone else does it chronologically; but I think it has to be simplified.
The other thing is to have consistency with the photo sizes. 1600 minimum size would be ok. The sets whose biggest size is smaller than that- I think sets back your site. But then again I can't speak for other members.
|
08-22-09 04:16pm
|
Reply
4
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jr2375:
(zachvenice's Reply)
As a previous member, I had no problems whatsoever with the zip links. They worked quite nicely with a download manager.
I do agree with some of the comments here about file names. The picture set zip files are named a little cryptically, but they do make sense when you get used to them. The video files, however, are another matter.
Have you ever considered revising your naming scheme? I realize that doing so with all the content currently available would be a rather monumental task and would not be feasible. However, I find that a filename that reflects the date of release (or shoot) and model name, and perhaps even a hint as to the content, is rather useful.
If you want all the current content renamed, I would volunteer to do it for a nominal fee. Aside from a small fee, all that I'd ask is that I be given a laptop in the corner of a room when the photo shoots are made so I can make the name changes. I promise, I won't bother anyone! ;-)
|
01-11-09 01:01am
|
Reply
5
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Not it is not! It requires that i be at my computer the whole time. I usually use the point click method of adding things to my download manager anyway. I find this to be a better was because I only get one copy of everything and do not end up skipping stuff.
Really need to work on the files names, they absolutely suck! I can deal with it though. The bad part is that I notice that the links us a sort of time stamp that makes them expire after an hour or so. So no queuing a handful of videos up in my manager. Having to do extra work to rename everything is bad enough, but to have to do it more than once because the links expire is absolutely frustrating.
When I was at MC-Nudes a while back I had the same problem, as well as FTV and several other sites. So it is not only this this that is making life harder for paying customer, but a good handful of them.
Brazzers, Reality Kings, Aziani, InFocuGirls all expire a little while later. VideoBox gives you about a week. BangBros was nice since theirs did not seem to expire, Hungarian Honeys does not seem to either.
|
09-29-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
6
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Well that sucks! I was very tempted to join your site but a 2 GB per day is very harsh. I am glad, once again, that I check the reviews first. I would have been plenty pissed off if I had joined only the be kicked out an hour later! Besides I dont care so much about being able to download 50% faster when there are limits anyway. That would mean I could reach the limit in 20 minutes instead of 30. Not a lot being said here.
On the tour pages the content looks like it would be great, but I do not want to have to take 6 months to download it all. A decent number of other sites have been removing or upping the limit lately, perhaps you should consider doing the same. At least go to 10 or 15 GB, or some other compromise point as to not offend the potential customers such as myself.
|
05-07-08 11:10am
|
Reply
7
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Appreciate the info Zach, I think I will stop by and join for a month.
|
05-05-08 10:51pm
|
Reply
8
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(zachvenice's Reply)
I posted this comment last September, when I was a member, and as I recall the speed was about 100kb/s.
I did just download one of your sample videos at 950kb/s.
|
04-24-08 03:49am
|
Reply
9
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(zachvenice's Reply)
Well, I'm glad to hear of this because that is what I found so frustrating when i was a member. Maybe I'll look into it.
|
04-24-08 03:44am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
