| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Celine:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Hi, please email me at celine@virtuagirlhd.com
|
02-09-09 08:22am
|
Reply
27
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Celine:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Hi! happy new year and thanks for the nice words!
Yes, we've been in this direction with a few models and we will think of this direction in 2009, nothing is decided yet )
We'll keep you posted )
Cheers
Celine
|
01-02-09 12:37am
|
Reply
28
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from TrashMan:
One issue that I have with Karups (and similar site AMKingdom) is the naming. The girls have incorrect names from time to time (incorrect in that its not their most common stage name) and quite often they will have like 6 girls with the same name. One thing the porn world has not utilized very well is a SURNAME!!!
Overall a good site though.
|
12-30-08 02:37pm
|
Reply
29
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Dude. LOL
You said "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
That is you inviting a response, I gave one, I really do not care what others place as review. So nope your reviews means little to those of us whom think highly of a site that you do not, that is correct. What I was asking is details on why you posted it, and you chose to not give one thats your choice yet again, but as a member ppl will ask questions, says so in the review protocols. Something along the lines of individual opinions etc. And nope know one wants to make you change your score.
They want to know why its what it is, the review did d not say enough.
Thats the point, and in closing you asked "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
Loaded lines like that will get a response usually lol.
Enjoy.
Cybertoad.
|
11-13-08 12:05am
|
Reply
30
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Cybertoad:
There are 5 main reason I rated this site as a 90's since you asked why it was rated.
1. Staying power this site and the network have been producing often and regularly along time.
2. Wow awesome models, not just good but consistently knock outs.
3. Good consistent download speeds.
4. Good selection and surfing.
5. Often updates.
I am not sure why you would rate a site that low is my question, wow a 60's for a site that has been consistently pouring out good adult material for years.
I read yours cons, and well they do not say anything in regards of why its lousy?
What speed video are you seeing ?
Site doesn't guarantee exclusive so why is that a con?
And what about navigation do you see difficult.
My take is your review was very short and is why I think others are asking um mm Why a 60's when there is not much you are saying to support that statement. You are entitled to your opinion in the review, but you are gonna see opposition in rating a site this good in the 60's . That means the site is barely usable in your view including the network wow....
But I respect your right to say what you feel about a site I responded because you asked why others rated it high.
So I answered since I gave a 93.
Still stand by it being a 93.
Cybertoad
|
11-12-08 09:45am
|
Reply
31
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
|
11-12-08 06:10am
|
Reply
32
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
And I question your addition
Babelicious = 75 (according to you) plus SexyBabes.tv, which you say is a decent site plus other sites in the network = 69?
It's a strange method of scoring a site IMHO
|
11-11-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
33
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Every member of this forum is, of course, entitled to their own method of scoring a site, but it's hard for me to understand how this network of sites gets a 69 from this user when Babelicious as a stand-alone site would earn a 75, and the user says that SexyBabes.tv is also a worthwhile site - and you get the whole of both sites, not a teaser of one or the other - so I would think that you would then have a base of 75 plus whatever should be given for the addition of SexyBabes.tv - and then you've got some bonus sites as well. It's hard to see that not getting you to 80 at least.
I agree with Exotics that, while you can find stuff in this network that has been posted elsewhere, sometimes in the same week, the higher quality posting of the set is in this network of sites as compared to, say, Twisty's.
The worst thing about this network of sites in my opinion - the navigation between the various sites - the whole thing would be SO much better if they connected it up in a more cohesive way, which they have mentioned as a possibility.
|
11-11-08 08:52pm
|
Reply
34
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from exotics4me:
Just wanted to add here that while some of the content is available on other sites, it isn't available in the quality that it is on Babelicious and to a lesser extent Sexy Babes. If Babelicious has a set that I already have, I replace the set I have with the Babelicious set since it is usually close to double the resolution. Also not for sure what the reviewer considers "lousy" video quality. Looking at my hard drive and the Babelicious network videos, I see what looks to be a standard of 640 high end on those with what looks to be a minimum of 2000 bitrate.
If you consider that lousy, you haven't been to many sites, it is well above the average.
|
11-11-08 08:10am
|
Reply
35
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from TheRizzo:
Good review, this is one of my favorite sites as well. I agree that it would be nice if they remastered some of their older videos.
|
11-06-08 11:37am
|
Reply
36
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Celine:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
yes of course those elements are part of our thoughts, all is question of time and choice of development because developping these A.I. functions must represent a real added value to the product )
But I can guarantee that your ideas and comments are listened to :)
Celine
|
11-04-08 03:28am
|
Reply
37
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Celine:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
your message has been submitted to the techies and boss here )
Thx a lot !
Celine
|
11-03-08 11:38pm
|
Reply
38
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Celine:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Hi ! thx for your reply and yes, I remember this message to the customer service )
Adding interactivity is beeing discussed at the moment here - I agree, this would accentuate our difference on the market and improve a lot our offer :)
Will keep you posted here )
cheers
celine
|
11-03-08 08:42am
|
Reply
39
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Celine:
Hi xbigvmanx!
Celine here from VirtuaGirlHD )
Thx for your review and comments! I would love to know a bit more of your expectations with a product like Virtuagirl... More stripteases ? more erotic actions on your toolbar ? etc...
PLMK!
Cheers
Celine
|
11-03-08 03:16am
|
Reply
40
|
Suze Video
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Cybertoad:
One of my favorite sites. The quality was pretty darn good there.
Good Review
|
10-31-08 12:01pm
|
Reply
41
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from PinkPanther:
Actually, this site updates every single day - one day it updates with pics, the next day it updates with the related vid.
|
10-31-08 11:18am
|
Reply
42
|
Virtual Fem
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from ace of aces:
nice review, thanks for the warning
|
10-31-08 02:52am
|
Reply
43
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Wittyguy:
Hey Xbigvmanx. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. As a heads up, people (including myself, not trying to hide behind this one) are going to want to see more content in your reviews. What you have now is pretty thin. Once you qualify for the weekly drawing you'll also find out that more in depth reviews will earn you more raffle tickets. Hope to see more from ya.
|
10-30-08 08:29pm
|
Reply
44
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Not a problem. Half the time I write reviews the site yells at me because I forget to set that and have to go back and do it so the review goes through.
|
10-30-08 01:31pm
|
Reply
45
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Your review states you are a current member! You cant say you are a current member if in fact you have not been for several months, that is very misleading (that is your cue to fix that in your review).
It is a site i will rejoin in the future, they have a lot of good videos and great looking girls. The navigation is the only real issue I had.
I posted a full review of this site, so you can read that and get my take on the site as it was as i was a member. Keep in mind that the site was changing while I was a member.
|
10-30-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
46
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from badandy400:
You can download everything in one month! :)
As you are a current member, can you tell me more about the site layout? I was a member several months ago and it sucked, but I know they were working on it.
|
10-30-08 01:00pm
|
