| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
bigvman, I think you misunderstood my post. My main point was that you could have posted a comment with the word "warning" in the title and explained the slow speed situation and at least a close description as to where you are located. This way, potential members would see the warning clearly labeled in the comments in case they were in the area you are in or close to it. See what I mean? Since we don't title our reviews, yours just blends right in with the other reviews, but warning as the title of a comment would have been clear to everyone.
Though one of their webmasters is now posting on this entry, I would like to say that I've not known many sites that offer refunds. Similar to your comparison, unless the store you hypothetically mentioned has a return policy, then I wouldn't see why the customer would be upset that they didn't get a refund. You also mentioned that the hypothetical product was defective, but in this case, if the rest of us are using the DDF sites and you're saying you know when in America that you wouldn't have these problems, I think you can see that the defective part isn't their site.
I'm on your side though, I hope they do something to fix it for you.
|
09-03-09 02:14pm
|
Reply
2
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from turboshaft:
This sucks! ISPs can really ruin one's experience with a site, especially if far faster speeds are possible.
I also joined under the August 10th Anniversary deal but only for one month (I guess I have some sympathy for my hard drives), and my download speeds have been very decent, but I'm in the U.S., not Europe (which definitely beats Iraq in Internet access!). I have been get some pretty slow page loads, but that was expected with the warnings other members had given in last month's comments.
I am not sure if the "bonus" sites are completely non-exclusive. House of Taboo is definitely separate from 1BD, but aim of its content sort of demands that. Other sites it is hard to tell what is what, though the badandy-amount of content on 1BD can make it pretty difficult to tell, not to mention that models work across many of the sites doing similar acts. For example, the sizzling Zuzana Z. does fisting on three or four of the sites, but I haven't found all of it on 1BD.
Good luck on getting a better connection!
|
09-03-09 02:11pm
|
Reply
3
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Ace DDF:
Hi,
First of all, I apologize.
We are looking into this. It is not permanent, nor a global thing. Our office is in Europe too, and we get maximum download speeds, and I also get the same from my home.
It is more like custom routing issues between specific ISPs. I hope that it gets solved soon.
Thank you for your patience,
Endre
|
09-03-09 05:20am
|
Reply
4
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from exotics4me:
My first thought when reading this review is that it probably should have been a comment/warning instead of a review. The reason I say that, you have 6 pros/4 cons, and two of the cons only are cons in the area you are in.
On the flipside, I'm also in on the special right now at 1byday/DDF and have received 95% of my max download speed for two straight weeks. The only problem I've had is that a few thumbs don't open, but that has always been a problem with the DDF sites. Believe Spencer's new TBP 1byday review even mentions the problem.
There also have been a few other comments here about the sites running a little slow during this promotion, but each says their DL speed is fine. If you will look back at your bottom-line, it isn't so much a review of the site or content as it is an explanation of the problems you are having with the site. Not trying to bust your balls or anything like that, I'm just not for sure how a site with 6 pros and only 2 global cons rates a 69 and think it would have been much better served as a comment/warning for those that will be in the area you are in.
|
09-02-09 02:09pm
|
Reply
5
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from dracken:
Thank you for sharing your difficulties with this site. As a person who travels between the states and Europe this info is very, very valuable. I understand why you gave the site a low score and I really appreciate your input.
|
09-02-09 01:27pm
|
Reply
6
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from TheRizzo:
Good review, this is one of my favorite sites as well. I agree that it would be nice if they remastered some of their older videos.
|
11-06-08 11:37am
|
Reply
7
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from MargulisAZ:
I'm not really a fan of this site any more but I will say they do have a lot of content, that's for sure.
|
06-04-09 10:27pm
|
Reply
8
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Not a problem. Half the time I write reviews the site yells at me because I forget to set that and have to go back and do it so the review goes through.
|
10-30-08 01:31pm
|
Reply
9
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Your review states you are a current member! You cant say you are a current member if in fact you have not been for several months, that is very misleading (that is your cue to fix that in your review).
It is a site i will rejoin in the future, they have a lot of good videos and great looking girls. The navigation is the only real issue I had.
I posted a full review of this site, so you can read that and get my take on the site as it was as i was a member. Keep in mind that the site was changing while I was a member.
|
10-30-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
10
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from badandy400:
You can download everything in one month! :)
As you are a current member, can you tell me more about the site layout? I was a member several months ago and it sucked, but I know they were working on it.
|
10-30-08 01:00pm
|
Reply
11
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from PinkPanther:
Actually, this site updates every single day - one day it updates with pics, the next day it updates with the related vid.
|
10-31-08 11:18am
|
Reply
12
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from TrashMan:
One issue that I have with Karups (and similar site AMKingdom) is the naming. The girls have incorrect names from time to time (incorrect in that its not their most common stage name) and quite often they will have like 6 girls with the same name. One thing the porn world has not utilized very well is a SURNAME!!!
Overall a good site though.
|
12-30-08 02:37pm
|
Reply
13
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Monahan:
If you use the PU/TBP link to the site, you will also get the $19.95 rate for the first month...recurs at b$29.95.
|
05-31-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
14
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Nubiles Captain:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Yes contacting the model is legit. I can't promise all of them are going to respond but some do. Its funny that our initial review from the best porn was penalized for having bonus sites so we stopped adding them. Its just the other sites we had in our network and by now they are pretty old, and we noticed the more time we spent on shooting new exclusive content,people where happier. I understand your point though. We are working on more girls who squirt, glad you said that.
Thanks for the feedback!
|
07-19-09 09:04am
|
Reply
15
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Nubiles Captain:
Thanks for the review. I wanted to point out a few things.
-We are working now on a few group sex hardcore scenes. GGB, BGBG. We are doing that to improve the variety, it is in the works now. Also we are working to improve the variety in the solo scenes as well.
-The average person on an extremely fast cable connection would not even come close to downloading the entire site in one month with no download limits.
Thanks
Captain
|
07-18-09 09:07am
|
Reply
16
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
A fellow member here, Denner, has a thread in the forum about how to handle the different currencies being charged by some sites. I believe that he said he would send the website an email and most would give him the US Dollar rate. You could try that. Nubiles has really good customer support and a pretty nice webmaster to boot.
|
05-04-09 11:05pm
|
Reply
17
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Goldfish:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
You're probably getting charged the Euro value-added tax. They tax online services over in Europe.
|
05-04-09 08:12pm
|
Reply
18
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
ahhh maybe they have that damn regional billing where they charge you in euros or something. I hate that crap.
|
05-03-09 12:55pm
|
Reply
19
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from TheRizzo:
One of the best sites online. Not sure where you got the high price from but I joined for $24.95 through Paysite Discounts a couple months ago. I would have a hard time paying $37 thats for sure. No site should be more than $30 a month in my mind.
Good review :)
|
05-03-09 12:48pm
|
Reply
20
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Wittyguy:
Hey Xbigvmanx. Just wanted to say welcome to PU. As a heads up, people (including myself, not trying to hide behind this one) are going to want to see more content in your reviews. What you have now is pretty thin. Once you qualify for the weekly drawing you'll also find out that more in depth reviews will earn you more raffle tickets. Hope to see more from ya.
|
10-30-08 08:29pm
|
Reply
21
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Dude. LOL
You said "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
That is you inviting a response, I gave one, I really do not care what others place as review. So nope your reviews means little to those of us whom think highly of a site that you do not, that is correct. What I was asking is details on why you posted it, and you chose to not give one thats your choice yet again, but as a member ppl will ask questions, says so in the review protocols. Something along the lines of individual opinions etc. And nope know one wants to make you change your score.
They want to know why its what it is, the review did d not say enough.
Thats the point, and in closing you asked "Its hard for me to understand how people think these websites are in the high 90s"
Loaded lines like that will get a response usually lol.
Enjoy.
Cybertoad.
|
11-13-08 12:05am
|
Reply
22
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
from Cybertoad:
There are 5 main reason I rated this site as a 90's since you asked why it was rated.
1. Staying power this site and the network have been producing often and regularly along time.
2. Wow awesome models, not just good but consistently knock outs.
3. Good consistent download speeds.
4. Good selection and surfing.
5. Often updates.
I am not sure why you would rate a site that low is my question, wow a 60's for a site that has been consistently pouring out good adult material for years.
I read yours cons, and well they do not say anything in regards of why its lousy?
What speed video are you seeing ?
Site doesn't guarantee exclusive so why is that a con?
And what about navigation do you see difficult.
My take is your review was very short and is why I think others are asking um mm Why a 60's when there is not much you are saying to support that statement. You are entitled to your opinion in the review, but you are gonna see opposition in rating a site this good in the 60's . That means the site is barely usable in your view including the network wow....
But I respect your right to say what you feel about a site I responded because you asked why others rated it high.
So I answered since I gave a 93.
Still stand by it being a 93.
Cybertoad
|
11-12-08 09:45am
|
Reply
23
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
I understand what you are saying, but your review lists a con as, "Lousy video quality". It isn't specific to the "other sites" as a matter of fact, in your bottom line you are specific to say, "I concentrated on those two sites". All sites that have been around for a long period of time have some bad quality clips. You mention ATK, where most of their videos are in parts and can't even be downloaded in full clips and are not any better in resolution on the videos. ATK also does not have full zip downloads and doesn't have half the resolution of the picture sets found on babelicious or sexy babes.
And most of all, I cannot understand why when you join a site that you would take off for "bonus" sites. That isn't the least bit logical. There is the old saying that you don't have to go to those sites. I would even question most of the logic in the review. Like saying it is hard to get the content on your hard drive, only to then say the zips are good and something other sites don't offer. I'm not trying to be negative towards you, quite the opposite in fact. I am saying though, that your review borders on looking like a review posted by someone trying to lower the overall score of this site. Especially since you mentioned that you read the other positive reviews. I've said it on here before, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but there still is a point where we have to consider that society today is known to have some members that dislike the "popular" whether it is sites, people, etc.. And that is what this review sounds like.
|
11-12-08 06:10am
|
Reply
24
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
And I question your addition
Babelicious = 75 (according to you) plus SexyBabes.tv, which you say is a decent site plus other sites in the network = 69?
It's a strange method of scoring a site IMHO
|
11-11-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
25
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(xbigvmanx's Reply)
Every member of this forum is, of course, entitled to their own method of scoring a site, but it's hard for me to understand how this network of sites gets a 69 from this user when Babelicious as a stand-alone site would earn a 75, and the user says that SexyBabes.tv is also a worthwhile site - and you get the whole of both sites, not a teaser of one or the other - so I would think that you would then have a base of 75 plus whatever should be given for the addition of SexyBabes.tv - and then you've got some bonus sites as well. It's hard to see that not getting you to 80 at least.
I agree with Exotics that, while you can find stuff in this network that has been posted elsewhere, sometimes in the same week, the higher quality posting of the set is in this network of sites as compared to, say, Twisty's.
The worst thing about this network of sites in my opinion - the navigation between the various sites - the whole thing would be SO much better if they connected it up in a more cohesive way, which they have mentioned as a possibility.
|
11-11-08 08:52pm
|
