| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jaypegged (0)
|
After reading all the reviews I decided to join despite the less-than-enthusistic reviews. I have seen this site advertised more for more than 10 years and finally decided to check it out for the original content with no high expectations.
No, not worth it. Only a small percentage of the photosets have decent size and resolution. Everything else is small and grainy. I could not get any download managers to work so the pictures have to be saved one by one. The sets also have a small number of pictures, not that I would take the trouble to save them anyway.
Too bad. There are some very nice girls on the site, but the overall quality is outdated, and downloding pictures is a real chore.
|
11-13-09 05:32pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
In spite of a number of attractive models, because of the high membership price and other negative factors of this site, it's not worth joining. So what is a reasonable score for a site that's not worth joining? Individual preferences vary wildly, but I think any score of 70 or above is too high for this site. That's just my opinion, of course, but I think that more emphasis should be put on making the score reflect the attractiveness/value of a site, as to whether the site is worth joining or not.
|
12-27-09 06:34am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
I think a score in the 70s is an acceptable score for this site. like has been said there are a lot of attractive women to be found here in original content. while some content is outdated, it isn't a terrible site. i have certainly seen worse... like i said in the review, if you have time to dig through it, there is some good content to be found.
|
01-08-10 10:21pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - slutty :
I agree there are plenty of worse sites out there. Like you say, if you take the time to dig through the site you will find some nice pictures of attractive models. But as I get older, I'm less willing to spend a lot of time digging through the trash; I want quality photos (or videos) put on display where I can easily find them.
My suggestion of a score less than 70 for this site is really more of a quibble than a serious disagreement. I basically agree with the points you made in your review. I personally find it difficult to come up with a score for sites, because I believe a site score is very subjective. That's my belief, but I recognize that some people appear to believe their scores are written in stone and are based on immutable factors that should be obvious to all (I am not including you as part of that camp).
Cheers.
|
01-09-10 03:50am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :
True, I also have a hard time giving sites scores, especially sites that have some good content that is hard to get at. I certainly am not one that believes my scores are written in stone.
|
01-09-10 10:07am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
Not one of your volumnous worded reviews, but well written and informative. You said enough, however, to discourage me from ever joining the site. An thats what reviews are all about.
|
08-04-10 08:21pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - graymane :
Yeah, my earlier reviews are perhaps not quite so wordy, and perhaps a little less informative - been trying to improve. I will say based on the most recent review for this site, that it might be worth looking into whether or not they have made any reasonable improvements. I think the content was good, just difficult to get at.
|
08-04-10 11:27pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - slutty :
Thanks for the tip. There seems to be a lot of interest in this site, And from a respectable number of savvy people, I might add.
It sure looks tempting, but for $40 it's gonna have to diliver what I want. I wish you better luck on your next attempt. I'm anxious to see what you will think of it, and will be looking out for your review.
|
08-05-10 01:18am
Reply To Message
|
