Pure Taboo (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Pure Taboo is included in the Adult Time network. I believe the Adult Time network, which has over 50,000 hardcore videos, is one of the best porn bargains on the internet. Especially if you can find a discounted membership price during one of the holiday specials.
-Excellent, high grade visuals. An artistic use of darkness and a gritty feel to the videos that emphasizes the darkness of the plot.
-No download or streaming limits.
-Photoset accompanies each video.
-You can stream the videos in the following definitions: 288p, 432p, 576p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p (UHD).
-You can download the videos in definitions from 360p through 2160p.
-The video runtime can be 36 to 60 minutes: this gives the video a chance to be plot-driven, which is unusual for a hardcore porn video: The impact of the sex is heightened by the plot, making it more than two bodies slapping against each other.
-Number of vids is 156. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Normally, 156 vids does not seem like a large number, but these vids are a cinematic experience that is different from watching most hardcore videos: you can let your mind engage in the action like a sensual dream with dark overtones. The impact is greater than your average hardcore porn, because it's not just sex, but perverted sex.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. Especially if you join Adult Time on a discounted membership price and get access to the Pure Taboo site.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites.
-Many of the videos are dark. This is an artistic choice that is supposed to highlight the taboo nature of the sex. Like film noir. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Pure Taboo site features videos that are the porn equivalent of hardcore movies. The videos are visual fantasies of twisted desires: what is really impressive is the care and craft that goes into the storytelling of hidden desires, and how people can enjoy their darker sides.
The videos have a darkness that is deliberate (the lighting is dark, as well as well as the plot).
Bottom line: The Best Porn (a related site to PU) scores the Pure Taboo site with a score of 76.
The TBP grades for the site are:
Downloads: B+
Streaming: B+
Interface: A-
Vid Count: C+
Vid Quality: A-
Content: A
The TBP site lists a lot of criteria that go into how a site is graded for a score. But the TBP site also states "The new score now gives each reviewer the complete freedom to decide how the site should rank overall and within it's niche."
TBP gives the Pure Taboo site A- or B+ grades for the site factors and then gives the site a score of 76. Which makes no sense.
I personally think the Pure Taboo site deserves a score in the 90s.
The site is one of the best, most artistic hardcore sites on the internet. Featuring strong plots, twisted elements of desire, and the dark side of human fantasies.
The professional reviewers give Pure Taboo a score in the 70s.
While the amateur reviewers at PU gave the site the following scores:
mbaya 01-25-18 90
lk2fireone 02-09-18 95
exotics4me 12-03-18 90
I think the Pure Taboo site is an impressive piece of artistic hardcore porn that features an almost cinematic approach to twisted desires.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
As far as I can tell, the professional reviewers who scored this site in the 70s, are either blind or have a hole in their head. Or maybe it's just a lack of appreciation for story-driven porn.
The TBP review, dated 2019-03-29, states, under cons:
"Minor Negatives:
It looks like all the photo sets are just vid caps, even if it doesn't state that anywhere. You can still download them in a Zip file if you're interested."
This is another example where I think the reviewer is either blind or senseless: Yes, the photosets might be vid caps, but the quality of the vid caps is good to excellent: Whatever software program made the photos was excellent. The photo are focused, the model is shown clearly, almost no photos show the model with her head cut out of the photo, the photos have good lighting (taking into account the artistic darkness of the film that is done deliberately to create a gritty amosphere). The photosets are worth collecting.
This is not the MetArt style of brilliant lighting, but more in the style of Natasha Shon, who uses darkness and natural lighting to create an artistic effect.
My best guess is the the TBP reviewer is simply too blind to understand what the site is trying to create, and that's why he gives the site a score in the 70s, when it deserves a score in the 90s.
If you watch some of the videos at this site: I suggest watching the following, as a sample of the excellent craftsmanship and twisted desires the site specializes in:
Brother's Wrath, starring Gia Derza
My Daughter, the Whore, starring Athena Raye
Impregnating the Sitter, starring Alina Lopez
Call Waiting, starring Jane Wilde
Daughter Slut-Shaming, starring Emily Willis
Over Her Head, starring Lily Rader
What My Cousin Did, starring Ivy Wolfe
A Father Unleashed, starring Chloe Foster
Uncle Fucker, starring Giselle Palmer
Massage Bait, starring Chloe Cherry
Doctor's Origins, starring Arya Fae
Blind Surprise, starring Chloe Cherry
If you watch those videos, I believe you will think the site is worth far more than the membership price.
Watching these videos is almost like going to a theater and watching a hardcore porn movie, except you are watching in the comfort and privacy of your own home. These videos have artistic and professional craftsmanship, the plot and acting, of a commercial movie. Pure Taboo, along with the competing sites like Porn Fidelity, are among the best in class for artistic, hardcore porn with edge: far better than hardcore sites like Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, which feature hardcore porn, but the stories, camera-work, quality of the videos at the Pure Taboo and Porn Fidelity sites are outstanding. If you are a fan of adult hardcore porn with a twisted edge, you owe it to yourself to sample these sites, which are best in class: truly outstanding, compared to the trash that other sites are putting out.
In defense of the TBP site reviewer, I can understand that not everyone who views a Picasso painting immediately becomes a fan of his art.
But to score Pure Taboo in the 70s, while giving the site B+ to A- for its component factors, is senseless and sloppy. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
