Unfortunately as MindGeek grow bigger they get greedier. They recently acquired Transsensual, a site I plan on reviewing but they got hold of it after I had left. I'm almost sure they've changed the download model there to be consistent with their other acquisitions - behind upgrades after having signed up with no disclosure.
I'm not really sure how to modify my review to reflect these changes.
I find facing doggy style to be one of the most underrated positions in terms of viewing pleasure. Particularly the angles where you don't actually see any visible penetration - your imagination and the female's facial expressions make it more enjoyable I find.
As long as they disclose beforehand, I'm fine. I take issue when there isn't disclosure, when they don't mention streaming nor downloading. Not even in the terms and conditions. That system is deliberately designed to mislead customers as far as I'm concerned.
I was subscribed with one of the sites earlier this year. From my experience, it is not a minefield but vigilance is still an absolute necessity. Rearadmiral has covered many of the bases already.
I wouldn't even say they're a shady site at this point. They are fully aware as is many people of their blatant exploits and will continue to engage in them all for the pursuit of profit.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Access to the Adult Time network
+4K is available for videos dating back to October 2018 last year, 1080p is available for all down to 160p
+196 videos at time of this review, 40-100 mins length each (50 mins average)
+Excellent schedule: two updates per week (5 days, 2 days cycle)
+Sensational production values shot in cinematic, reduced saturation
+Best and most creative porn stories out there that pertain to the taboo theme – stepfamily, cheating, coercion etc
+Revered talent young and MILF who act generally well
+Images are all in 1920x1080
+Download speeds are splendid, you can also download videos from thumbnails (handy)
+Favourite videos, models and channels on the network
+Like or dislike videos, image sets and models
+Comment on videos, image sets, model profiles and even channel profiles
+Adult Time’s black user interface is impressive, simple and easy to filtrate – can blacklist performers and content you don’t enjoy
+Deals page has discounts for other sites
Cons:
-No real images, just vidcaps (a fixed rate of 35 per shoot) which is disappointing
-Stories can drag for over 20 minutes, not everyone is patient enough for this no matter how good they are
-Questionable cinematography decisions with their close-ups, inclusions or exclusions, sometimes out of focus
-Believe it or not, some scenes have better stories than sex - trailers can overhype
-Depending on context, the instigator tends to be the better actor - reluctance is a skill talent often overlook
-Not sure about the “twists” lumped at the end of many videos, they distort how I feel about the scene
-Creampies are lacking, there needs to be more variation in finishes
-Thumbnails can be confusing in relation to how many talents are involved/will perform
-No info on model profiles
-No downloadable trailer previews, would be useful with these video lengths
Bottom Line:
Extra information:
No condoms (my preference)
Pure Taboo is the centrepiece at the prodigious Adult Time network and a site I’ve been eager to join thanks to their highly dramatic and robust trailers. They operate through a dark, creative, brooding slant on modern pornography that seeks to challenge the audience and push the envelope on society’s customs - no doubt answering many fantasies down the line. These guys have gained quite the following, the volume of engagement through comments and whatnot are telling of how successful their campaign has been. Every shoot warns viewers from the gate with a message advising viewer discretion. A feat followed from Pretty Dirty, its predecessor?
Bree Mills is Chief Creative Officer for Gamma Entertainment, a major player in today’s porn but this site right here is her prize. If I recall, she has dubbed Adult Time as the “Netflix of Porn” so this is the mainstage Netflix series’ equivalent in terms of pulling power. Bree explores a cluster of various taboo themes comprised of: stepfamily, cheating, coercion, pregnancy and futuristic – and she ropes all these ideas down with chunky stories before any explicit action unfolds.
Delving deeper, it’s a two-way street. Bree’s direction and vision only goes as far as the performers allow it, since they can quite literally make or break scenes. There’s an important ingredient that I like to call referential dialogue, often I find it pivotal on whether shoots blow you away or descend into bland, dreary slogfests. If the talent refers to the storyline throughout, even a bit, you’ll enjoy emphatic displays of exceptional pornography. But if it’s all just moaning and “yes”, it feels disenfranchised; story is evidently high on the pecking order at Pure Taboo, so it’s a let-down to see some talent lose track of the plotline during action. There are exceptions however, depending on context. Anyhow, commitment to the storyline should be a top priority here so I’m glad to say the majority fall on the right side of the coin. Bree has set a bar to mitigate these problems, because the stories are the best I’ve seen on any porn site.
On filmography. Stylistically speaking, Pure Taboo are unlike its contemporaries. Despite being a follow-up from Pretty Dirty, their execution has heavier undertones. The visuals here are often grey and bitter, laced with tremendous production value and cinematography. Dialling back on the saturation is effective considering the material. Sound plays a huge role in its faint, tense build-ups in the background. It makes for a more compelling watch, the sex becomes that more gratifying as a result.
Adult Time has adopted this Netflix format well as all the channels are labelled clearly with logos. You can filter through various tags and models across all channels or selected channels, you can even blacklist! It makes navigation a simple task.
Now, a few bones to pick. I’m not overly fond of what is captured onscreen - particularly during points of interest. For instance, sometimes they’d rather zoom in on the male facial expressions over an impressive deepthroat by the female. Or when there’s some dirty talk and they cut to a close-up of genitalia. Impact is lost in spots, close-ups are overdone for me and I’m left unsure of what’s being conveyed. Whole body shots where you see both talents going at it need more screen time, both facial expressions and dirty bits simultaneously - these cuts are way too short for my liking. There are also intermittent focusing issues.
While I praised the stories earlier, there is a downside. Their length: it can take a while before things kick into gear so sometimes it can get to you no matter how well done it is. We can’t all be in for the long haul, but ironically some of them are even better than the sex. Make of that what you will.
Moreover, there’s no dedicated photos - just vidcaps. While fellow folks at PU don’t mind, it’s a bit weak on their part for my liking. Despite their careful selection, vidcaps can’t match the depth and quality in actual photography. The photos could be edited up with the saturation the videos have and provide flavour other sites won’t. Even 30 images of dedicated photography would be much better than their current fixed 35 vidcap image rate.
Trailers are sometimes better than the scene, they’re highly dramatic so the hype can get to you. Plot twists at the end are also a thing here and are hit and miss, usually miss but I can ignore them.
That’s all there is to cover. Pure Taboo commands a lot of respect from me for their dazzling stories. But I’m not overly keen on the cinematography choices - I’m probably in the minority at that though. Regardless, I am a little disappointed. It comes down to taste at the end of the day. If you like porn with story behind it, this place is an automatic by any account.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+4K is available for every video right down to 270p, this is rare
+Fabulous production values captured in a manner entirely separate from its companions, cinema-like standards makes you feel agog
+Light BDSM, male domination focus no extreme kinks/apparatus here straight and lesbian
+100 videos from when I left last month, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average)
+Update schedule at every five days
+Images (avg. 100 per shoot) available in 3000x2000 vice versa, some of them look wonderful
+Much like the others, Deeper is packed with the most esteemed and celebrated performers
+Scenes are shot in various environments
+Favourite and customise your own collection of talent and content
+Rate videos and models
+Comment on videos
+Similar black interface to Blacked Raw, simple navigation
+Deals page has discounts for other sites
+Very friendly and responsive director, Kayden Kross in the comments
Cons:
-No additional access to other sites
-Some scenes have intrusive spotlights, others have tragic lighting which create tedious experiences – generally the videos have dark lighting which I dislike
-Content is bland considering the moniker, stories are paper thin and compared to what I was expecting
-Model aesthetic differs from other Lansky sites
-Some shoots feature music that is too loud or lasts too long, should fade out much earlier
-Sizeable files, 4K range from 4GB to 11GB and 1080p from 2GB to 6GB etc
-Tragic search engine remains, no advanced searching available
-Can’t rerate scenes or models even if you’ve made a mistake
-Site can time out after some inactivity
-Notification bell cannot be disabled
-Little info on model profiles, only a brief bio
-Thumbnail previews only work on the main page (latest six updates)
-Oldest videos have no accompanying image sets
-No TBP Discount
-No downloadable trailer previews, could be handy with these file sizes
Bottom Line:
Extra information:
No condoms (my preference)
A preface if you will. One weakness I’ve identified among Lansky’s sites are repetitive stories. While I praise his glam oriented vision, occasionally I felt that his production values would provide leverage. Good, creative stories freshen content up and can help combat the monotony folks at PU identified so I’m unsure why it’s low on the priority list. For me his sites are in the supreme bracket across the entire porn tree, but indeed this is a blemish overlooked.
By bringing Deeper into the fold, my interest was instantaneous as the name alone is possibilities galore, they could fill voids that have long been overdue: content with story behind it. Kayden Kross of TrenchcoatX was identified as an important figure to embark on this new project. She packed her bags to shift here from her old site, replacing the latter site and is thus at the helms of Deeper. I’m unsure of the semantics, but that’s the gist of it. You can search for TrenchcoatX but the link will redirect you here instead.
Deeper is the newest addition to Lansky’s ever-growing glam matrix. As mentioned before, this one is very much unlike its companions. Presentation wise. I would class their videography as a lush, premium blend of cinematic porn, with elements of gonzo through certain cuts and captures. Naturally you’ll think of Sex Art, but not so fast. They shoot material that could be stripped from shows and movies in my opinion. Not that it’s a bad thing by any means. Anyhow, it appears they’re trying the inquisitive and curious approach. All videos are available up to 4K, they aren’t messing around here. The talent pool is also unsurprisingly chock full of the most fabled adult stars kicking.
Let’s crack on. Needless to say, the moniker alone should depict a greater focus on story but I found that the emphasis I’ve been chasing hasn’t really been met. Instead, Kayden is churning out more BDSM material compared to her earlier work which I’m not keen on. It has its appeal, males dominating women through light BDSM but I think Deeper could and should be more. I don’t mind the odd shoot on it but recently it’s become so lopsided on that niche. Yawn, it’s just not my cup of tea - they should mix things up like they did before like with Lesbian content and amp up the dialogue.
Despite the intimate shots, the light-handed stories blot and hollow my curiosity, wasted potential. The natural model presentation Lansky is known for isn’t the same here either. Bright nail polish and lipstick are copiously used on newer material. I can appreciate a new site carving a distinguishable position among its siblings but thematically it’s not very cohesive. Over the years, Lansky’s beauty aesthetic played a major role on cannoning his body of work and name to the pinnacle. It’s off-kilter for this value to not follow suit in these parts.
More issues surface. While videos are exceptionally crisp, I don’t enjoy all aspects of it. The lens flare doesn’t add much and is at times obnoxious, but the lighting is another story altogether. It can get very bad. Some scenes contain a distracting spotlight, others would be disastrously unlit to the extent you see little to nothing of interest. It’s not very provocative if that’s the goal - they verge on unwatchable for me. Generally the videos have dark lighting which I’m not on board with. I also find it bizarre that some supplementary image sets are in settings that do not match with the video. This concerns the action, not solo imagery.
The more videos I watch, the more I’m unsure whether it belongs under the Lansky umbrella. Not because the quality isn’t there (it certainly is) but because it differs so much aesthetically. It hasn’t fit in snugly as I’d hoped. It’s an awkward one because it’s arguable that the Raw sites differ in that aspect as well. Either way, the name “Deeper” is ingenious. In theory it should yield a virtually bottomless pit of ways to get creative. At the moment though, they are not maximising their possibilities and potential to boot. Their content is quite inconsistent, varying from stylishly elegant to basic run of the mill couple porn or light BDSM with little bite to it. The model aesthetic bothers me as well. I don’t mind Deeper switching things up, but for me that’s a Lansky core that should be adhered to. Their older updates were better.
Expectation got the better of me. I have no aspirations of returning in the near future because for all intents and purposes, I found them underwhelming and bland even with regular updates. They need more creativity and dialogue to ascend to something greater. Something “Deeper”. Inside the Lansky fortress, this is the first site I’ve found pretty mediocre honestly. It didn't give me that wow factor. Give it a shot if you’re into these kinks. Perhaps it’s for you.
Porn is particularly rampant with it though, it's hard enough to dodge all their bullets. The industry is suffering as it is thanks to tube sites and piracy but these methods will deter people even more from joining up - how ironic.
Their greed won't stop us from voicing our concerns though when it goes too far. This site has been growing very quickly since its conception years ago so anything to help others from getting unwanted charges is good enough for me.
Multi-Monthly/Yearly plans no longer come with downloads
To say I'm disappointed would be an understatement.
TBP: "A monthly membership to TransAngels only includes streaming videos. You'll need to pay an extra $14.99/month to get downloads. Signing up to for 90-day or yearly plan, or switching to one of these multi-month options, will also provide access to downloads."
RR: "Downloads are only included with a 90 or 365-day membership or a $14.99/month upgrade."
No longer are downloads included with a 90 or 365-day membership, at least not the 365-day deal I went with so I'm assuming it's the same story for its smaller sibling.
Granted these reviews were published in May 2019, I was let down after subscribing to TransAngels with a yearly plan only to be greeted with requiring a "download add-on" package. A "yearly download add-on" price is more or less the same sum as the yearly subscription plan, thereby doubling the initial sum. This makes a huge difference.
They already do not disclose whether its stream-only or whether it comes with downloads on their tour pages or anywhere before joining, I am well aware of malpractices like this so I look to TBP and RR for these eventualities and user reviews but this blunder feels like a kick in the teeth.
Took it to their support team as I was frustrated, but I was told it's "just the way it is now".
For the first time, I was planning on cancelling the deal altogether in the space of an hour within signing up. I'd never done that before. But we managed to negotiate a deal on their "yearly downloads add-on" knocking 30 bucks off it.
It beggars belief how sites think they can get away with this unscathed like nothing has happened. Once I roll my review out in the coming months I will dock a good amount of points for this despite the negotiation softening the blow. It's one thing asking for an additional charge on standard monthly plans, but to charge on top of multi-monthly and yearly? That's a whole new story altogether and in my opinion, greed.
On TBP: "A monthly membership to TransAngels only includes streaming videos. You'll need to pay an extra $14.99/month to get downloads. Signing up to for 90-day or yearly plan, or switching to one of these multi-month options, will also provide access to downloads."
On RR: "Downloads are only included with a 90 or 365-day membership or a $14.99/month upgrade."
I purchased a "365-day membership" deal yesterday but didn't get downloads. Granted, the two reviews were published in May 2019. Either they got it wrong, or TransAngels have changed it since to make it even worse! I'm betting on the latter.
This is really unfortunate, as I relied on those two reviews but was - unintentionally - misguided by them. I use their reviews to avoid this annoying no downloads enclosed malpractice in the first place. I feel let down.
TransAngels or whoever run their multitude of sites have gotten greedier, for a "yearly download add-on" they like to label it they have the audacity to charge a sum similar to the initial price on top just for downloads! I was unusually angry and took this to support and asked why but to no avail, just "the way it is".
I managed to knock off 30 bucks off their "yearly downloads package" to agree a deal, though reluctantly.
I will make this apparent in my review once I've used the site enough, in any case I am still not happy about this at all as I was really looking forward to joining up. Still will be with them for a year, let's see how that goes.
Though getting 30 bucks off the downloads package has softened the blow, this blunder will certainly knock a good amount of points once I roll it out.
If it wasn't for the censor, I would be far more invested in Japanese porn than I am. It has its advantages as you said, but I find it difficult to get around it.
This is a hugely positive review, thanks for writing it! Guess this must be your favourite site with a score of 99 right? Haha, I'm glad you found this site as enjoyable as it is.
The only thing between me and getting a 6-month subscription to the Dogfart Network is the 4K charge per video. I'm a sucker for that format so it might add up too much otherwise. If they could incorporate a price upgrade instead, that would be marvellous.
The final issue is a sore one, revolving around what I fear most: cancellation. Sigh, this is what happened. On the left side of the main page scrolling down, there’s a link for billing. Got to a page asking to fill out details. Fine but there’s a box to enter your card number. What relevance does a card number have on cancelling? I thought that this was off, perhaps there’s something I’m unaware of. After that, I got the following message: “no account based on submitted information”. I check everything before I put it through, so I tried again – same result. I knew this was an issue on their end and not mine. I wasn’t getting anywhere, so I went to their forums and PM’d a support member, asking for both 4K and my overall membership to be cancelled before the rebill. I read a PU comment somewhere that you have to cancel both, cancelling your membership won’t cancel 4K as well. I can vouch for this because the billing page displayed those options. This is daft, they’re doing this on purpose. I put the PM through sometime before the rebill date, then I received a reply giving me my cancellation date a month from the day I sent the message. To put it simply, I was going to be rebilled and they ignored my request. I thought about contesting this, but I couldn’t be bothered and wanted this done and over with - my 4K upgrade on the other hand was cancelled immediately. A quick gander at their forums and you can see hundreds of posts asking for cancellations dating back to early last year. At this stage their intentions are clear and it’s not a good look.
It’s dirt like this which make me question the integrity of these sites. You are an established entity in the adult sphere, you bust out excellent material and you choose to indulge in this. What a shame. This site and the others cannot and will not realise their full potentials under these lousy measures. To conclude, Monsters Of Cock hold a fabulous interracial (most of it at least) hub and there are a myriad different positives to rave about, other elements could use a reboot of course but most importantly there’s quality in their main product. Much to my annoyance however, their ideals and values are in another dimension altogether. Unfortunately you’ll have to bargain with yourself here. I will join again, after a lengthy break of course.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+Access to the enormous BangBros network that boasts around 8,000 videos in total
+4K available for videos dating back to September 2016 down to 480p, much older videos (pre-2009) 720p to 360p
+Sizeable collection of 725 videos, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average)
+Very lively interracial, wonderful production value shot gonzo style that’s cheesy but still very sexy
+Hundreds of brilliant photos to go around (200-700 per shoot not counting thumbnails), screenshots rich in quantity as well
+A huge wealth of different talents, from the popular to the relatively unknown, mostly aged 20-26 at time of shooting
+Favourite videos and models and create your own library, you can also like or dislike both
+Plenty of tags to choose from under videos or you can use the search engine
+Good to very good download speeds
Cons:
-Updates every two weeks
-Content isn’t entirely interracial, lends to name more than I thought and lacks clear identity
-After logging in, takes you to obnoxious page brimmed with site package deals
-Videos play automatically upon loading
-Extra $5 per month required for 4K access
-Irritating malpractices, more details below
-Rolling watermarks randomly throughout videos across centre
-You can’t comment, they have a feedback utility though I guess
-Search engine misses videos with points of interest due to poor tagging, sometimes they forget to include the model names which is strange
-Site interface in my opinion looks outdated
-Navigation between various sites on the BangBros network is a mess
-Many shoots have huge image file sizes, 500MB is quite common here with some as big as 2.5GB
-4K video file sizes can be as much as 9GB
-Cancelling is cretinous, I had to use their forums to cancel properly
-No downloadable trailer previews
Bottom Line:
Disclaimer: please note that by "interracial" I am referring to black men and not black women, these are industry standard terms not my own.
Buckle up because this is going to be a long one. Had to cover a lot of bases here so for the first time I’m going beyond the limit. This is down to the controversy surrounding them.
BangBros have been in the porn “biz” for a long time and are pretty much a household name these days. If you like porn, you will have at some point almost certainly heard of these guys. I joined in pursuit of Monsters Of Cock as most of the content there is interracial and I’m a sucker for the niche. I have to be honest, I was anxious joining. Reason being these guys have bundled up quite the notoriety over the years, even being dubbed a minefield by people at PU due to their various advertising ploys. However I bit the bullet and tried it out, aware of the potential calamities that lay ahead. I ran into problems alright, but we’ll get on to that soon. Let’s be positive for now.
Monsters Of Cock excel in punching out jovial, ditzy and ultimately sexy eye candy that would satiate many. There’s fantastic interracial. Under the BangBros umbrella, their videography is why they propelled to stardom in the first place. Their capture in my opinion is one of their defining features, similar to a fish eye lens? This style is shared across the board from what I’ve seen. Edges are rounded off in the corners, so the footage bends into the outer reaches. It supplements the action neatly, especially the POV segments which are a sight to behold because well, they’re phenomenal. Not sure if these guys are the only ones who utilise this capture but I know it’s uncommon. The crop of talent here is rich with variety, all the women are from different walks popular or not. Nowadays, the popular talent are more of a commonality.
Quality wise you’ll be in safe hands, the production value keeps ascending. Today the scenes are shot in deliciously crisp, sharp definition. They are diligent here because damn does it come through. On the other hand, sound is an area where they can improve. Some shoots sound very muffled, especially during sex. Unprofessional in my books, usually I am more lenient but it shouldn’t be happening at all considering BangBros’ stature and budgets.
Photos look brilliant, there are hundreds per shoot and they also supply screencaps with similar quantities. I wish more sites did this as having both options are great, makes comparing actual footage with photos much easier. Likewise with their videos, they’re very corny yet undeniably sexy. It can be to their detriment though, whilst browsing videos the photos used as thumbnails on site might not be in the video at all. Clickbait-esque, screencaps would be better. Solo imagery doesn’t appear to be a focus either.
Time we hone in on negatives. Their upload schedule is every two weeks, pretty slow but the network makes up for it. 4K access requires a $5 upgrade per month. A reasonable charge years ago but not now. The site interface here isn’t impressive either, it looks aesthetically deprived. It looks outdated, grey and lifeless to me. If you took a screenshot and told me it was from 2012, I would believe you. Navigation is clunky too especially when browsing sites, no clear designations such as logos or home pages for any of them. Clicking the site links below videos is the easiest way I think. Amateurish qualities if you ask me, this system is crying for an overhaul.
There’s also a lack of identity, is it really an interracial site, has it become one over the years? I see plenty of interracial content for other sites on the network and wonder why they weren’t released here, seeing as their premise isn’t all that different. The name Monsters Of Cock does lend other possibilities, but clarity would be appreciated. There isn’t anything particularly distinct about the way they shoot either, they use the same BangBros formula as everyone else. Story while not a focus can do with some elbow grease on creativity. You’re launched into the action very quickly most times and on occasions it feels like they’re jumping the gun.
Now more familiar problems ensue. Ads, ads, ads. Getting offers after logging in, seeing a long column at either flank on the page while browsing videos saying “unlock” above each site thumbnail. It isn’t as bad as “one wrong click” as I’ve read from some at PU but vigilance is a must. Not what you want at a porn site. They also use a cheap, animated watermark that rolls across the face of videos at times which is obnoxious and serves no purpose. Get rid. Furthermore, there’s a loyalty scheme where every three months of joining lands you a free site. Once I reached the threshold, I expected to choose a site at my own accord, but they chose one at random. Wouldn’t have minded so much if the site didn’t have 10 videos. Tacky moves, amigo.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+Access to the StaXXX network
+1080p to 480p range of resolutions available for every video
+Somewhat okay interracial pornography
+Cool abundance of images, looking surprisingly sharp (avg. 300 per shoot)
+Favourite videos and access your own library
+Tags are consistent with the content on display
+Sometimes there’s two separate scenes with the same performers, a nice touch
+Site interface is nice to navigate around
+Find out about upcoming scenes
Cons:
-Content is not exclusive
-Suspected content rotation with no dates available and there’s only 42 videos
-Scenes have amateur production value, they look like older videos that have been upscaled
-Some scenes have poor audio balancing
-Upon loading videos, it is unclear which sites videos are from, not marked as “Black Please” etc so had to use another way
-Pagination is poor, sometimes the page selector doesn’t respond and requires refreshing – have to start from page 1 every time
-Rubbish downloading speeds, it caps at a third of my full maximum speed
-Can’t use more than one tag concurrently
-Cancelling is awkward, requires you to visit the biller’s site to send an email ticket
-No TBP Discount
Bottom Line:
Disclaimer: please note that by "interracial" I am referring to black men and not black women, these are industry standard terms not my own.
Black Please is among the StaXXX network and due to its focus on the interracial niche I had to give it a peek.
I am confused. I do not think the content is exclusive. I think they re-release material from several years ago in higher definition (site launched in 2016). Perhaps some new clips thrown in the mix every now and then. It certainly shows when watching the videos, there is an amateurish quality to them that is not reflective of the standards we had in 2016. By no means are they unbearable, but they certainly aren’t good either and it tars the experience. The majority of the content appears to be poor upscaling to 1080p to me but I could be wrong.
The videography is a basic gonzo presentation that favour excitement. Storylines are nigh-on non-existent which is to be expected. There are good scenes here but nothing really to write home about as many are run of the mill. Sound has unprofessional qualities to it or at the very least outdated. Some clips feature audio that hasn’t been compressed correctly so some moans and screams pierce the ears. This isn’t done in an intentional manner as I would be able to tell if it was. Production value is not up to scratch either then.
Site interface is poor. Clicking on scenes do not have any labels or tags entailing it to be from Black Please amid the other sites on the network; the only way to find out is by clicking on the video and reading “Related Videos” below and seeing the site names there. Gets real confusing when I use the “interracial tag” to be returned results from other sites. None of the clips are dated on the site either, so there’s no way to identify their update schedule. Now unlike the sound issue this is clearly intentional as they do not want us to be aware. Carpeting over such information is an alarming indicator of a site that is sketchy. The site also times out surprisingly fast and because they use a pagination system that’s on a single URL, you will be slammed right back on the first page after refreshing. Annoying when you’re browsing but with a bite-sized collection of just 42 videos there aren’t many pages to sift through anyway. Navigation is nice and simple aside from that. Model profiles aren’t here either, no information about them at all.
A few negatives so far, anything to rave about? Well the images look nice and sharp. Even if they have been touched up perhaps too much, most of the videos have hundreds of images with good helpings of solo and action - this is always a good thing in my books. The talent pool here is also obscure with many models I’ve never seen or heard of before, this is also good considering the nature of the site. I don’t think it’s trying to be big budget. The other good thing is that there are a few double clips featuring the same pair of models (male and female). They are not merely one scene split into two because they finish with different cumshots despite wearing the same clothing. This is something I wish more sites did, featuring the same pair across more than one scene definitely adds to the fantasy. However I understand this isn’t very convenient nor viable in terms of demand and more of a matter of personal taste. Alas, credit is where credit’s due and it’s nice. Tagging system aside from the non-existent site labelling is mostly good as well, but using multiple tags isn’t possible. That’s it when it comes to positives.
Images aren’t released alongside videos at the same time vice versa. I couldn’t access the supplementary image set on a recently released video, only to see the photo set labelled with an upcoming date marked on the thumbnail. I also accessed a photo set but couldn’t access the video, you get the picture. My suspicion is that most of the content here was produced years ago and are being cleaned up, upscaled, shelled out and then advertised as new product and/or rotated. On their tour page it says nothing about remastering old content so this is disappointing. They also advertise content on there to only after having joined see that their upcoming releases. What’s the point? Download speeds are also consistently well below normal – they’re capped. Cancelling also required messaging the biller via an external site through tickets.
Unless you want what I believe to be a half-baked attempt at remastering old interracial clips that aren’t even exclusive and rotates content as if they’re new, I would give this site a hard miss. Not many redeemable qualities here, especially if they’re not going to divulge their release dates. I have no intention of returning. Not because I hate it but because I don’t care for it. Black Please is a forgettable, mere blip. Getting access to the rest of the StaXXX network made this subscription barely worth it.
Could you try viewing it in a private internet window (or log out but that is much more cumbersome so no need) and see if Transsensual is listed on Mile High Media? Let me know if it is there or not.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
