Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sugarcookie

Sugarcookie (0)

Newbie
52*
exotics4me (0) 04-20-19  09:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons: - Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line: Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.

I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.

What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.

Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.

There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos

That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.

Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.

This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.

All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.

The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.

I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.

You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.

It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.

It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.

The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.

Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.

They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.

My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.

Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) WTF?
1GB connection?
I live in LA county (CA), and the fastest speed from Spectrum is 100 Mbps. (I think).
I need to call around to see what's available.

Am I jealous? You bet your ass I'm jealous.

LOL.

04-21-19  12:08am

Reply To Message

2

exotics4me (0) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

It's real, in this area the lowest speed is 200M, we also have 400M and 1GB (it's more like 940M when using). I got it in their Spectrumtacular deal. I did have to switch my mobile service to their mobile service but it is through Verizon and that's who I already had. You can check here to see if it's available out there.

https://www.spectrum.net/support/internet/gig-speed-support/

04-21-19  02:29am

Reply To Message

3

Wraith0711 (0) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

I have a 1 gb connection through xfinity/comcast, be advised there is a 1tb monthly limit though. You have to pay an extra $50 a month for unlimited data
04-21-19  07:24am

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :

Thanks for the info.
I will drop by my local Spectrum office to see what the plans and pricing are.
On the internet, Spectrum says 100 Mbps is what they offer.
But will check at the local office, for better information.

But great that you mentioned what is available in your area.
I've read that Spectrum is rolling out faster internet connections, but I don't know specifically if they are offering it in my area, and what the charges would be.

The basic offering is 100 Mbps, no data cap. For $45/month.
Which is not bad.
But 1GB seems like Zoom-Zoom to me.

04-21-19  07:56am

Reply To Message

5

lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #3 - Wraith0711 :

Thanks for the information.
I haven't been keeping up with what is being offered lately.

But Comcast is not available in my area.
(I live in Los Angeles County, norther part of the county.)

Spectrum and AT&T are the basic choices for internet service in my area.
I used to be with Spectrum, but currently with AT&T.
But I'm probably going to switch back to Spectrum.
Because, for me, my ATT contract is for 75 Mbps.
But I use the Wi-Fi for my laptop.
And the Wi-Fi speed often drops to less than 1 Mbps, which is lousy.
With a 100 Mbps connection at Spectrum, my Wi-Fi speeds ranged from 8Mbps to about 22 Mbps, so that's why I switched to ATT.
Which I thought would be faster.
But there is some wiring problem with my house, which the installation tech mentioned.
And that's why my Wi-Fi speeds average less than 1 Mbps to maybe 5+ Mbps, which is lousy. Since I'm paying for a 75 Mbps connection speed.

04-21-19  08:06am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.