| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
zachvenice (Suspended)
|
Download speed has since be raised 50% of what it was before and the daily download limit is 2GB.
|
04-23-08 02:16pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
badandy400 (0)
|
Toadmix
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
|
07-23-08 04:01pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - badandy400 :
badandy400, I would point out that the review in question was done back on Jan 1st of this year ... the same day Toadmix opened his PU account.
I don't say this to undermine what you've said here, only to point out that it's probable Toadmix is a little more conscientious with his scoring now.
|
07-23-08 06:43pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Khan :
Khan
Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.
Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)
I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.
|
07-23-08 07:22pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #4 - badandy400 :
But what you seem to be forgetting is that (currently) there is a time limit on when a Review can be edited. That review is over seven months old.
While YOU might WANT the Review revisited, that still doesn't make it something he can currently do.
|
07-24-08 04:54am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - badandy400 :
I did look at when I did the review, I have already asked Admin to remove but nope they said it stays as it is. was alearnbing experiance. I have changed how I do reviews and I am much more accurate check em out ok?
Toadmix
|
07-24-08 09:26am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Cybertoad :
If it's a consolation ...
We're currently working on a policy change that will allow you to go back even late after the fact to update your earlier reviews. Can't say more just yet.
|
07-24-08 09:46am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Cybertoad :
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
|
07-24-08 04:58pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Khan :
Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.
Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.
|
07-24-08 07:20pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Cybertoad :
Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.
|
07-24-08 07:25pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - badandy400 :
I think the admin is looking for away for us to do it ,but perhaps after some other users show concerns he will let me review it again.
Possibly.
No not a member anymore but would rejoin to give a better review if they removed the old one.
Thank you for the support I appreciate it.
Toadmix
|
07-24-08 10:57pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #9 - badandy400 :
badandy400 remarks: "I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that?"
Sorry but yes, you're mistaken on this one.
This is actually addressed in the FAQ. Specifically see:
How do I edit my review or comment?
https://www.pornusers.com/faqs.html#faq_31
Originally the window for edits was 7 days. We stretched that to 30 days. A review was intended to expire after 1 year and at that point, a User could submit another.
But as I said, we're working on some stuff that will make all this moot. Just not ready to talk about the changes before they're ready for prime-time.
Hope that helps
|
07-25-08 08:39am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #12 - Khan :
To fix a flawed review I did a followup that atleast allowed to to explain my insanity LOL
It also allows you to edit the score which was my main reason to want and edit. Anyways anyone whom saw this please note the follow up I did. Guess you can for 12 months, it doesnt change the originl review but adds to it.
Toadmix
|
07-25-08 09:35am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #12 - Khan :
Gotcha! It has been a while since I read through all the rules, they are getting a bit rust to me again. Thanks for link, everything makes sense. I can see how it would be hard to allow everything to be changed all the time and removed and still represent the whole picture.
Thank you Khan for pointing these things out to me!
|
07-25-08 01:16pm
Reply To Message
|
