| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
It's been a long standing curiosity to me why no one has realized that computers and broadband connections are now fast enough to stream higher resolutions. If they did, maybe they'd come up with web cams that would be worth looking at. As it is, I think they suck.
|
02-15-08 12:43am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
ace of aces (0)
|
i love them time to time but i would realy never pay extra money for that. also it `s mostly no possibility to dl a session.
|
02-15-08 04:07am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Monahan (0)
|
Danni's Hot Box had very well produced FREE live shows with chat room interaction using multiple high res cameras. Because they had to deal with the traditionally unpunctual porn whores, they frequently had late starts and unhappy participation by paying menbers. (I quit the site for other reasons, so I don't know if those sessions are still there.)
|
02-15-08 07:08am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Toadsith (0)
|
While yes, there can be debates raging on indefinitely about the video / audio quality present and future for live cam sites - but I think the question is more aimed toward preference of the style of content these sites offer. I have dabbled in the genre of live cams with mixed results. One of my first porn expenses was on a live cam site, I dropped 20 bucks or so for 5 minutes or whatever it was - and it was just really stressful. A number of the girls on the site just seemed really depressed and rather desperate to get paying viewers. I felt really bad about "directing" the girl to do whatever - so I ended up just telling her to do whatever she felt like, sort of donating the money to her. The pay-per-minute scene is sort of like hanging out with a group of car salesmen each trying to sell you their body. And because they are mostly a bunch of pretty girls, I found the whole experience depressing.
On the other hand, I enjoyed the sites that offered free live cam services. Since the girls were getting paid no matter what, they were more relaxed and friendly. I was a member of MET-Art when the started BETA testing their live cam service - it was a bunch of fun - the girls liked chatting, would always be in something skimpy and would occasionally show off quite a bit if they felt like. They'd simply ignore the asses that would shout "show us your tits!" and spent time chatting with anyone interested in actually talking. I spent probably half an hour chatting with one girl in Prague about Woodchucks - apparently she had never heard of them and was quite fascinated by the little creatures. That got some strange responses from the other users but the atmosphere was relaxed enough that people just went along with it. When I join up with MET-Art again, I'm sure I'll be back chatting with the models, but I'll never do pay-per-view again.
Cheers.
|
02-15-08 09:51am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Davit (0)
|
I have tried a few, and been ripped off. Once I wasted several minutes (and British Pounds) on a girl that just ignored my every request. I complained to their customer support, and was just told "You can't order the girls to do stuff, they're not robots!" But I was being perfectly polite, but she just ignored me! So, fair enough, i just never went back again. Their loss. (Unfortunately I can't remember which one it was).
On the other hand the best one IMO is Streamate (and there are probably other websites that are clones of this and take the same cam 'feeds').
You will find girls on here that genuinely CUM - I mean proper thick creamy white girl-cum that pours from their pussies; not piss from the urethra that so-called 'squirt' sites have.
See my review for it. I like Cams.com also, but I find Streamate the best value, because for a cheap monthly fee you have access to ALL the recorded shows on the site! It is also full of gorgeous filthy girls that are also responsive to your requests. And for as little as $2 a minute.
If anyone can recommend another as good as this (and the same value) I would love to hear about it.
|
02-15-08 01:01pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I've had a couple of nice experiences with actual strippers in clubs, and of course there's nothing like being there with a hot, fun girl who's naked as a jay bird and is very friendly and pretty close to you.
That spoiled me, even though most strippers are just making money and some of them can get really bitchy and cold. Why my charms don't work on them is beyond me. ;)
But it still spoiled me enough that the live cam route isn't appealing UNLESS it's with a girl I know is sweet, friendly, and very hot, which can be a total crap shoot.
I never tried at Mindy Vega's site, and I don't know if she's still doing it, but she might be. She's a sweetheart. Of course then you have to compete with all of the other guys and put up with their stupid shit, so I guess that's why I've never bothered.
Trying to muscle one's way up to "alpha male" on a live cam show just doesn't seem worth the bother unless your ego is big enough.
|
02-15-08 05:04pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
pat362 (0)
|
I have seen a recording of one, but never seen an actual webcam live. I must not be voyeuristic enough to find any appeal in webcams. Give me porn that is prepared, choreographed, and well filmed thank you.
|
02-15-08 06:28pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
I like sites that have live cam shows as part of the site, such as Danni.com, Karen Dreams, Adriana Sage, Jana Cova, Nautica Thorne's site or Jenna Haze's site, but I wouldn't pay for a web cam site where that was the whole thing, nor could I see paying $20 or more for a private cam show. The thing that I find amazing is that, despite the development of broadband and the high quality of the streaming that some sites have, few sites have cam shows that look good or work well. Misha's cam shows, for example, almost always look like crap. Phil Flash's used to look good, now they are also postage stamp sized crap.
The site with the best quality web cam shows I've seen lately are at Met Art - in Siberia! What the hell is up with that?
|
02-15-08 08:31pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Does anyone else think you might step over an unwritten line if you go from published porn to 'one on one contact' via cams? I know that my wife tolerates my inclination to look and accepts it as a "man" thing but I don't think she'd take it lightly if I had personal contact with a model.
|
02-16-08 02:08pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
nygiants03 (0)
|
Im not into the whole webcam porn. The video quality is way to poor on pretty much all sites to enjoy live webcam feeds. It would be kind of enjoyable if there was no skipping, and high quality streaming( however im yet to see anything of this nature) Also webcam porn moves way to slow for my interests.
|
02-17-08 06:10pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
badandy400 (0)
|
I find many of them to be scams. But there are a few out there. I just see no need to pay extra to be able to talk to a chick while she is stripping. I usually watch porn on mute anyway, so it would be pretty pointless. Besides, who cares what she is saying, it is all about what she is doing. It is not as if I will get a date with he or something if I talk nice to her!
|
03-18-08 11:19pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
I like the idea but hate the price.
|
05-27-20 11:48am
Reply To Message
|
