| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
PerfectGonzo (Suspended)
|
There is a 1080p HD sample on the tour:
http://trailers.primecups.com/primecups.com_trailer_1920.wmv
Make sure you save to your disk instead of left clicking to stream. Note because of the high motion in the sample, there's more pixelation than usual.
|
04-02-08 05:29am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - PerfectGonzo :
Very nice! I want to add though that this video is at 8 MBit/s, so dont try to have bunch of other stuff running when you watch it. I will have to watch it in my other computer, mine has trouble with 8 MBit videos when it is downloading at the same time.
The HD looks promising, I will have to rejoin in the near future to check it out. Nothing like crystal clear big natural boobs! :)
|
04-02-08 01:07pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
The webmaster of Prime Cups seems concerned if we download or stream - I think PU's can figure that one out...
But that's NOT it.
A 2 Gb size for a movie/video-file for around 20-25 minuttes is just plain crazy...compared to the quality of some sites and their 2-400 Mb of just great quality
The only other site goes for that exagerated size of movie-files is the Sexy Goa.
I remember when I joined Sexy Goa and downloaded those giant files. Two problems: it takes way to much hd-space and navigating/watching (fast forward) through a wmv-file that size is slow and hopeless.
Don't go for it, folks...
|
04-02-08 01:30pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
It didn't sound like they cared about downloading so much as getting people's complaints about the stream being jittery. What the webmaster said makes perfect sense to me.
But, Denner, I do have to agree that 1980x1080 is not absolutely necessary. Many people have great looking videos at a fraction of the file size. InFocusGirls and ALS for example, they both have great looking videos at 400-800 MB depending on length, granted they are usually shorter. Good a 2 MBit video with great filtering can look better than a n average 6 MBit video, and be that much smaller in size saving us and the webmasters both space and bandwidth.
Consider, 2.5 GB at 8 MBit/s would be just shy of 42 minutes long. At 4 MBit/s the same video would be 1.25 GB, obviously. InFocusGirls uses that bitrate, although the resolution is 1280x720, they still look great. Plus those videos play easier. Not everyone can use a high end computer for porn watching. I would say for them to keep that in mind when posting new videos. Perhaps posting both sizes would be the thing to do. I am not a member currently, so I can not say if they do that or not.
|
04-02-08 02:03pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - badandy400 :
Wow, buddy...
You seem to have a splendid knowledge of those video-files - I'm certainly not much into that technical stuff - so, it's really good to get some guidance.
From what I have experienced after downloading a 1,5-2 Gb - (typical WMV) video-file it is trouble/uneasy play. Whereas a rather great looking play (whole-screen) of a 200-500 Mb (approx. 15-20 minuttes) can be crisp and - as you put it - easy played.
But seriously, I don't get those folks at Prime Cups (and their big Co.):
Video-files that last about 20 minutes in 2 Gb. Who needs it?
|
04-02-08 02:17pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Denner :
I would say that a 20 minute scene should be around 500 MB, 200 can be getting pixelly when they movie fast. Of course this only counts if the original and the compression method are good.
There is a certain appeal to the 8 MBit video though. It does look great, but unless you are going to spend good money on a system to store and play it loses its appeal. Brooke Sky has some 8 MBit video that looks wonderful as well.
Personally I do not worry about file size too much, but I can see many people fretting over 2 GB per scene. Unless you want to start dropping $100 for 500 GB drives you are not going to be able to keep very many of these 2 GB'ers on hand. But on the bright side, at least it is not at Blu-Ray Bit rate!
|
04-02-08 08:43pm
Reply To Message
|
