Rachel Aziani (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Very HOT woman!
Good download speed
Exclusive content
166 Videos
New videos look great 5 MBit/s, a few even higher
Old videos look good considering
Price decent, $25
Access to other sites, 7 total
Many extra features, blog, scrapbook and so on
Updates weekly
400 picture sets
Pictures look great, up to 1200x1800 |
Cons: |
No zips for picture sets :(
Must log in too often
Only one download format, other than streaming
I was unable to resume downloads
Videos could use better names |
Bottom Line: |
If you like extremely hot, mature women then do not bother reading this because you are wasting good time. Just join this one now! It really is that damn good!
Rachel Aziani is drop dead beautiful. She has wonderfully large breasts, a great face, and awesome body, and a certain grace in movement.
There is some variety here, but it is mostly solo. You will find some G/B, but no real G/G. A lot of videos have dildos being used.
The newer videos look wonderful, at over 5 MBit/s and 960X540 they look great even full screen. There is about 21 hours worth at this point making 13.3 GB. The older ones do not look as good, obviously, but they are still worth downloading. They are 320x240 @ 398 KBit/s and increase with time. Also, there are small screen caps next to the video showing a little of what to expect in each video.
There are 166 even though the video names go up to 179. There was a few numbers skipped along the way. Not an issue, just wanted to clarify.
The photos increase with time as well. The start out small at 384x576 but end up a nice crisp 1200x1800. There is now 400 galleries, but no zips! GRRR!
Like the other sites here, you have to log in a lot and then go back through the whole site to find where you left off at, very annoying. This costs a few points along with the no Zips and G/G.
All around it is a great site with a few things that could be worked on, but nothing major. It is definitely worth trying out, I am happy it was recommended to me. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|